Obamateurism of the Day
posted at 8:05 am on July 20, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Barack Obama claims that his ObamaCare nationalization of the health-care industry will result in lower costs and healthier Americans. The CBO has already shot down the first claim, and Obama himself appeared to contradict the second late last week. When asked how private companies can contribute to the effort, Obama suggested that they implement programs … to prevent good health?
Obama: Well, let me — let me talk about what I think the American people are going to have to do. First of all, the American people have to recognize that there’s no such thing as a free lunch. Right? So, we can’t just provide care to everybody that has no cost whatsoever, you don’t end up having to make any decisions.
So, obviously, we’ve got to have a system that controls costs, gives people choices, but makes sure that we’re getting a good bang for the buck. And we’ve got to have the American people doing something about their own care.
Snyderman: So, self-responsibility.
Obama: So, self-responsibility is going to be critical. This is probably not going to be something that’s legislated. But I tell you what, every business out there is going to be looking at their health care bottom line. And increasingly what you’re going to see is that businesses are going to incentivize their employees to stop smoking, lose weight, get exercise, get regular checkups.
What we can do is we can encourage those companies that have those sorts of wellness-prevention programs. We can make sure that it’s easier to find a primary care physician to get a regular checkup, that everybody has basic insurance. But the American people are going to have to participate in their own health.
So we’re preventing wellness now? I’ve heard of wellness programs, and prevention programs, but never wellness-prevention programs. Unless that’s the new name for “comparative effectiveness,” which would be a good description for that rationing methodology.
Addendum: Normally I’d put a link to Chris Muir’s Day by Day site here, but today I want to do more than that. Chris has a fundraising drive to keep his excellent cartoon alive. Be sure to drop a few dollars in his collection to keep one of the Rightosphere’s most talented warriors in the fight!











Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
……
Jerk.
BigD on July 20, 2009 at 8:09 AM
sounds like a half azz hmo from kaysier…
SHARPTOOTH on July 20, 2009 at 8:09 AM
This is NOT my president. He doesn’t represent me. He doesn’t represent the hard-working, self-responsible, tax-paying, job-producing, freedom-loving citizen. He is the president for the complete opposite.
jbh45 on July 20, 2009 at 8:12 AM
Yeah…preventing wellness…
…like blatantblue said this weekend…obarfing badministration…I am so stealing that…
ladyingray on July 20, 2009 at 8:12 AM
but Obama is an excellent speaker. he never sounds stupid. we must analyse what he said and understand why it is we’re too stupid to understand him.
Phoenician on July 20, 2009 at 8:13 AM
this will come with an expiration date….
cmsinaz on July 20, 2009 at 8:14 AM
So many buzz words to keep straight – I can see how he’d fumble that one.
The BS is coming so fast and furious, it’s getting tough to keep up with the translations too.
forest on July 20, 2009 at 8:14 AM
But, but…Bush!
bridgetown on July 20, 2009 at 8:15 AM
.
I translate this as “yes it will, but I’m just not comfortable saying it outright until I read a poll or two”
sherry on July 20, 2009 at 8:16 AM
Yep, a jerk, and an authoritarian socialist. His wife warned us that “Barack wouldn’t let us” have personal freedoms anymore, but 52% of the people voted for him anyway.
forest on July 20, 2009 at 8:18 AM
The misspeak (preventing wellness) is less revealing than the repeated “have to” language. You “have to” do this we’ve “got to have” that. No free will. No self-determination. Mandates. Command, control and compulsion.
clorensen on July 20, 2009 at 8:19 AM
i’d like to know how he is going to get more GPs in the rural areas. when he reduces their salaries, & their health care benefits, why will those GPs come to the rural areas unless:
he mandates that GPs are paid the same wherever they live. that sounds like the Soviet Union.
kelley in virginia on July 20, 2009 at 8:23 AM
What do you mean there’s no free lunch! I thought that’s what dems were all about. Everyone gets free food, free health care, free money…etc. Is Obama finally admitting that people have to take responsibility for themselves and not count on the government for everything in their lives?
flytier on July 20, 2009 at 8:24 AM
My thoughts exactly.
ProfessorMiao on July 20, 2009 at 8:24 AM
I predict that federally funded midnight basketball leagues will be a major part of the “wellness prevention” programs.
mr1216 on July 20, 2009 at 8:24 AM
What are the American People “Going To Have To Do” next?
[Shudder]
TimBuk3 on July 20, 2009 at 8:24 AM
This article from powerlineblog.com puts the proper spin on the entire “elitist” debate…
Obama is a true Liberal Elisist, banking on the belief that Americans are so Dumbed-Down at this point,they will believe anything he and his bed partners in the SRM throw out there. Thank God for bloggers and talk radio!
Keemo on July 20, 2009 at 8:25 AM
I don’t see any flying pigs…
ProfessorMiao on July 20, 2009 at 8:26 AM
I’m guessing he meant ‘wellness/prevention’, not ‘wellness-prevention.’
BTW, is he going to quit smoking before or after the next reminder to inflate our tires properly?
jazz_piano on July 20, 2009 at 8:27 AM
Probably not going to be legislated? That’s an outright lie if the filthy liar in the White House has anything to do with it. Cap & Trade already includes that clause about lightbulbs since Americans are apparently too weak on self-responsibilty to pick the hazmat one so the polar bears are happy. When it comes to healthcare, they’ll start small by outlawing soda in school or some other mundane thing “for the children” Next thing you know, employers are going to be mandated to give free gym memberships to all employees and smoking will be considered a misdemeanor crime.
In short, I’m all for self-responsibility but not when it is being urged by a criminal who says that government “probably” won’t legislate you into doing what Big Brother thinks you should be doing.
highhopes on July 20, 2009 at 8:27 AM
I wonder, once a president has lost credibility with folks,just how does he go about getting it back? He lost me with the stimulus package full of pork.
scalleywag on July 20, 2009 at 8:27 AM
These kinds of rules and edicts don’t apply to people like Obama. They are mandates sent down from Congress to rule the little people, not titans like the filthy liar in the White House. Likewise Teddy Kennedy is out there advocating a healthcare plan that would have aready killed him off were he ever forced to get the kind of coverage he is insisting all Americans accept.
highhopes on July 20, 2009 at 8:29 AM
Personal responsibility? Not so much.
He’s just saying that the rich will be paying for all the free lunches.
jazz_piano on July 20, 2009 at 8:30 AM
“Americans have to…”
How about you lead the way on what Americans “HAVE” to do and provide an example by not chain-smoking five packs of Menthol Light 100′s every day of the week, POS Ogabe?
Pantload.
Bishop on July 20, 2009 at 8:30 AM
What do you suppose Keith Olbermann’s reaction to a Wellness-Prevention Program would be if it were uttered by Sarah Palin?
jimmy2shoes on July 20, 2009 at 8:32 AM
In my eyes, he never had credibility. Credibility is something earned, not bestowed by the MSM. And he’s done nothing since taking office to change my view of him for the better; if anything, he’s even worse than I feared he would be.
ProfessorMiao on July 20, 2009 at 8:32 AM
Neither do those pesky rules about honesty, integrity, and keeping one’s promises, obviously.
jazz_piano on July 20, 2009 at 8:32 AM
He never had me.
jimmy2shoes on July 20, 2009 at 8:32 AM
Step one: Be honest with the people. Instead of rushing to get this healthcare proposal pushed through before anybody reads it, announce that the bills currently being discussed are to expensive and unworkable and will be scrapped and he’ll work with Congress including the GOP on a bill that is more realistic and effective. Instead the filthy liar is still out there making claims that healthcare will not be rationed, it will not cost the taxpayer a single penny more, and that they can keep their coverage with a private insurer. Such baldface lies, easily refuted, will continue to eat away at whatever credibility the rat bastard traitor retains.
Step 2: Actually follow through with step one.
highhopes on July 20, 2009 at 8:34 AM
Probably not = I haven’t yet figured out how to make it mandatory. But I’m working on it.
rbj on July 20, 2009 at 8:35 AM
I normally engage in wellness prevention by brushing my teeth with sod.
blatantblue on July 20, 2009 at 8:35 AM
LOL
jazz_piano on July 20, 2009 at 8:35 AM
He says while he tells us to unhand our lunch money.
bluelightbrigade on July 20, 2009 at 8:37 AM
You should really try Scott’s Turf Builder. Absolutely fabulous results.
jimmy2shoes on July 20, 2009 at 8:38 AM
Yea, his policies overall are far worse than I ever imagined. It’s not just the health care, which, if passed, will go down as an even bigger boondoggle than the stimulus, (not to mention bankrupt the country and incite people to revolt)… but his foreign policies, if you could call them that, are pretty scary, too.
scalleywag on July 20, 2009 at 8:38 AM
84 % of Americans say that they are fine with the health Care they have. This is a Obama-manufactured crisis. And, by the way, using the term “self-responsibility” when taling about government-run health care, or for that matter, any government program, is a contradiction in terms.
kingsjester on July 20, 2009 at 8:40 AM
Right, so tell us exactly what this “not so free lunch” is going to cost the American taxpayer…
You fool, you hide the facts then tell us we have to face the facts.
right2bright on July 20, 2009 at 8:41 AM
Who is going to break the news to Tameka?
Increase in Overweight and Obesity Prevalence
Among U.S. Adults* by Racial / Ethnic Group
Overweight
(BMI > 25)
Prevalence (%) Obesity
(BMI > 30)
Prevalence (%)
Racial / Ethnic Group 1988 to 1994 1999 to 2000 1988 to 1994 1999 to 2000
Black
(non-Hispanic) 62.5 69.6 30.2 39.9
Mexican American 67.4 73.4 28.4 34.4
White
(non-Hispanic) 52.6 62.3 21.2 28.7
Source: CDC, National Center for Health Statistics, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Flegal et. al. JAMA. 2002; 288:1723-7 and IJO. 1998;22:39-47. *Ages 20 and older for 1999 to 2000 and ages 20 to 74 for 1988 to 1994.
bloggless on July 20, 2009 at 8:43 AM
I’ll bet he hasn’t even read the bill either. What a travesty our government has become. It’s a slap in the face to our forefathers.
scalleywag on July 20, 2009 at 8:43 AM
“Wellness prevent????” A Freudian slip, perhaps, as this Obamacare will no doubt cause wellness prevention.
bloggless on July 20, 2009 at 8:44 AM
My thoughts exactly.
When Obama speaks of “the American people”, I feel like I’m being addressed by a foreigner. I’ve never felt so alienated from my government.
David2.0 on July 20, 2009 at 8:45 AM
That statement alone by Bambi would be hilarious if it weren’t so pathetic.
TeeDee on July 20, 2009 at 8:46 AM
Stunning, isn’t it? I wonder if he has any idea that people consider anything run by the government a joke. Obviously he’s never been to the DMV.
scalleywag on July 20, 2009 at 8:46 AM
They exactly as bad as I imagined. The only suprise is the way the filthy liar and his henchmen in Congress don’t even put up a pretense of bipartisanship or mask what their real intent has been. The UAW has been handed the auto industry, ACORN has had untold millions flow into its coffers, he’s trying to make the tree-huggers happy by crippling the American economy with cap/trade and now he’s going out after healthcare to rub Hillary Clinton’s nose in the fact that he did what she failed to do.
Next on the agenda IMO are the social issues beginning with legitimizing the gay lifestyle within society, repeal of DADT, federal funding of abortions, return of the fairness doctrine to help his propaganda efforts, and a raft of other things that will further put the government into our everyday lives.
My only question is if Americans will wake up in time to thwart the filthy liar’s efforts. Because, once something like Obamacare passes, there is no going back.
highhopes on July 20, 2009 at 8:47 AM
added my two cents!
scalleywag on July 20, 2009 at 8:48 AM
At this point, I think Barry’s trying to out-Biden Biden. They must be having a competition.
Loxodonta on July 20, 2009 at 8:49 AM
This guy can’t control himself. He lets his hell-bent ideology creep into every speech. Talking about good health is not a bad thing but he subtly has to present it as mandatory calistenhtics before your shift at the factory.
sherry on July 20, 2009 at 8:49 AM
Well said! That’s got to be one of the top posts of the day.
highhopes on July 20, 2009 at 8:50 AM
and 1
and 2
and 3
and 4
now stretch
blatantblue on July 20, 2009 at 8:52 AM
From the Wall Street Journal:
It will be very interesting to see how Obama and the Networks spin this reality even during Obama’s scheduled primetime speech later this week. One has to wonder if this health care coverage includes “cliff jumping”.
Rovin on July 20, 2009 at 8:54 AM
Doofus.
myrenovations on July 20, 2009 at 8:54 AM
If this garbage is defeated, will we be treated to the very first Presidential Temper Tantrum(TM)? He seemed very close to it during this statement.
“Have to”? A wee bit petulant and dictatorial, aren’t we, Barry?
kingsjester on July 20, 2009 at 8:54 AM
It’s also part of the over-reaching of what the filthy liar is attempting to do in the name of reform. Tinkering with private insurance, payment schedules, and other such issues are reform. When it comes with legislation that lectures on obesity, that’s not reform but an attempt to give the state control over things that are none of the state’s damn business. Yes, fat people probably cost more but you can’t legislate self-responsibility because the minute the state tells you to do it, you’ve lost the self part of the equation.
highhopes on July 20, 2009 at 8:54 AM
He says these things as if they are new ideas. I have excellent health care and there have been any number of wellness programs I can participate in for many years, not only through my insurance but through the local hospital as well. Can you imagine trying to participate in a government run wellness program? It hurts to even think about it.
scalleywag on July 20, 2009 at 8:55 AM
Not sure he truly believes this line, but here is the crux of the issue.
Healthcare cost problems do not (generally) come from people who are responsible, who work for a living, and who take the necessary steps to ensure they are able to land and keep a job with adequate healthcare benefits. While there are tragic exceptions, much of the uncompensated care goes to illegal immigrants, folks who live on govt. programs, the homeless and/or addicted, etc.
Expecting a govt. insurance program, built upon the assumption that the people it serves will follow accepted practices (filling out appropriate forms, using “credits” to offset insurance expenditures and actually buy health insurance, etc.) simply Will. Not. Work.
Boondoggle waiting to happen.
cs89 on July 20, 2009 at 8:55 AM
So, if you get regular checkups, the government will make sure you have an easier time getting regular checkups. But if you don’t get regular checkups, the government will make it harder for you to get a checkup?
Barry really IS setting up a wellness-prevention program!
Loxodonta on July 20, 2009 at 8:59 AM
Someone else mentioned this, but I’d like to affirm: it gives me the creeps that Obama refers to us in the third person as if he were talking about some illegitimate or errant child.
Third person rhetoric indicates distance and superiority. Obama sees us as the abstract subjects of his Senior Thesis.
It’s all theory to him and his ilk.
jeff_from_mpls on July 20, 2009 at 8:59 AM
Do as I say, not as I do
cmsinaz on July 20, 2009 at 9:00 AM
Put aside for the moment the condescension of saying this to a whole nation, and note this: He doesn’t know what this axiom means.
“No free lunch” means that there’s no altruism in business. Everything is a quid pro quo. No one in business just buys you something without expecting something in return, if nothing else listening to his sales pitch during lunch.
What he means to say is, “Nothing’s free.”
So my question is re: OboobaCare, What’s in it for you, Obooba? What do you really want in return for buying us lunch?
Akzed on July 20, 2009 at 9:02 AM
Hooray for the WSJ! Once this program fails, and I truly believe it will, maybe citizens can start demanding that he do something about creating jobs (you know, the 3 million or so he said the stimulus would create) and reducing the deficit instead of jumping off the cliff with money WE DON’T HAVE!
scalleywag on July 20, 2009 at 9:03 AM
Obama needs to have this one in his win column. I suspect if it looks like it will go down in defeat, the filthy liar will attempt to push this thing through on a completely partisan basis. Here’s hoping that all of us are putting so much pressure on Congress that he’ll be unable to muster the votes even after Pelosi starts bribing Democrats again.
In the end, if this isn’t going to be a win, it will be held off and probably disappear without action or some smaller element will be rammed through so that victory can be proclaimed.
highhopes on July 20, 2009 at 9:04 AM
LOL! I swear this guy is going to take over Bally’s and they will become King Obama’s Wellness Centers.
sherry on July 20, 2009 at 9:05 AM
Wellness programs are what got us where we are.
Jaynie59 on July 20, 2009 at 9:05 AM
Other than the whole rationing of medical care thing, he’s spot on.
Here’s an idea for a GOP ad. Two guys sitting in a bar debating about communist-style health care. One guy asks: what’s so bad about free health care for everybody, I mean, isn’t that a good thing?”
And then over the loudspeakers the bartender announces “free beer!”
The crowd wild.
An hour later, the two-guy health care debate is over. Both of them sit there. The idiot says, “I had to wait in line an hour and all I got was a little shot glass of beer, this is crazy.”
Yeah, free health care. It’s a stupid idea.
jeff_from_mpls on July 20, 2009 at 9:05 AM
I normally engage in wellness prevention by brushing my teeth with sod.
blatantblue on July 20, 2009
Some images only work in the mind. That was very funny. Thanks for the LOL.
SKYFOX on July 20, 2009 at 9:06 AM
Living up to your name? I hope you’re right. I have the feeling he’ll get this pushed through one way or another.
Daggett on July 20, 2009 at 9:07 AM
Biden later clarified the President’s remarks:
Yes, I know it may sound strange, but we really have to prevent wellness to make this healthcare plan a reality.
JiangxiDad on July 20, 2009 at 9:07 AM
LOL
cmsinaz on July 20, 2009 at 9:08 AM
Every morning on every TV screen and billboard across America: Big Barry in tights.
Every night, children writing letters to Big Barry: Tonight, daddy smoked 5 cigarettes and mommy had two bowls of ice cream.
Yes we can!
Loxodonta on July 20, 2009 at 9:08 AM
look, if you have not written, called or emailed your Senators & Congressman already this morning, then stop posting & do so NOW.
we have to keep up the pressure. we can do it.
kelley in virginia on July 20, 2009 at 9:09 AM
Outstanding point about Teddy. Since Congress doesn’t abide by their heath decisions, they can afford to do what they want to average Americans.
Jeff from WI on July 20, 2009 at 9:09 AM
ugh!
cmsinaz on July 20, 2009 at 9:10 AM
I’m as opposed to BHO as anyone else, but “wellness-prevention”? Maybe he meant “wellness/prevention”. Ed, don’t be so nitpicky!
jgapinoy on July 20, 2009 at 9:10 AM
Average O’s gym???
ladyingray on July 20, 2009 at 9:10 AM
He will never see it that way. Imagine the control and power he felt in the “organized communities” in Chicago. He would tell them to jump and they would ask how high. He assumes the entire country is like his community, that we need to be told what to do because we are lost without him. And that in and of itself is the gift he has given us. I believe his attitude towards Americans contributes to at least half of the growing resentment and dissatisfaction we are seeing in the poll numbers.
sherry on July 20, 2009 at 9:10 AM
It’s worthwhile remembering what John Edwards (the unfaithful politician, not the psychic) proposed during the primaries because it is eerily similar to the filthy liar’s views on self-responsibilty.
TIPTON, Iowa – — Democratic presidential hopeful John Edwards said on Sunday that his universal health care proposal would require that Americans go to the doctor for preventive care.
“It requires that everybody be covered. It requires that everybody get preventive care,” he told a crowd sitting in lawn chairs in front of the Cedar County Courthouse. “If you are going to be in the system, you can’t choose not to go to the doctor for 20 years. You have to go in and be checked and make sure that you are OK.”
He noted, for example, that women would be required to have regular mammograms in an effort to find and treat “the first trace of problem.”
highhopes on July 20, 2009 at 9:16 AM
Obama still believes that all he has to do is speak and the public will continue to be mesmerized by his presence before them.
He doesn’t seem to realize that the magic is rapidly slipping away and he is ill prepared for the coming backlash. It will be foot-stamping time soon as THE ONE realizes that he isn’t going to get his way.
Yoop on July 20, 2009 at 9:16 AM
Maybe TOTUS II burped.
Seriously though, I really find it scary that he’s talking about maybe “legislating” self-responibility. That’s the real take away from here even if the obamateurism is nothing more than sloppy word choice by the filthy liar.
highhopes on July 20, 2009 at 9:20 AM
If the country can manage to survive 3 1/2 years of this incompetent fool we will be very fortunate . . . but the nation will nevertheless be completely destroyed and dismembered.
rplat on July 20, 2009 at 9:21 AM
+1
cmsinaz on July 20, 2009 at 9:22 AM
It’s possible that he can be shut down by midterms, and kept on a short leash by Rep. controlled legislature. But I suppose things would have to get even worse than now for that to happen. If he loses health care, and loses cap n trade, I think it’s less likely that he’ll lose the Congress.
JiangxiDad on July 20, 2009 at 9:24 AM
Thanks for posting that. In that short snippet, I see four “required’s”, two “have to’s” and one “can’t choose”.
Their true colors are in their language.
sherry on July 20, 2009 at 9:24 AM
For the very first time in his affirmative action charmed professional life. It will be interesting to see just how much political capital he decides to use on this offensive. He is putting himself out there as salesman-in-chief and it doesn’t seem to be working all that well. Opponents are not coming around to his side by his mere statements. He’s been shaking down groups like the AMA individually, promising them things that he can’t deliver, but the biggest roadblock is the pricetag. He can’t cook the books enough to hide the simple reality that this plan is unaffordable without tax increases or some other politically unappealing approach.
highhopes on July 20, 2009 at 9:26 AM
I’d say the litmus test isn’t either of the above bills but rather the mood of the nation and the state of the economy come November 2nd 2010. If there is some tangible turnaround that the filthy liar can lay claim to “the stimulus working” he has a better chance of keeping his corrupt majority on the hill. If, however, the economy merely sputters like a sparkler instead of booms like a full-fledged fireworks display, there may well be a “throw the bums out” backlash that could seriously cut into what the filthy liar can ram through Congress on a strictly partisan basis. I for one would take time off from work to see Nancy Pelosi hand over the gavel to the GOP.
highhopes on July 20, 2009 at 9:33 AM
I think it is obvious he meant wellness/prevention plans and not wellness-prevention plans.
shick on July 20, 2009 at 9:36 AM
I’m quite sure Obama realizes that he made the best argument against his health care plan(see second paragreph).I am just as certain that anyone who voted for him won’t see it.
DDT on July 20, 2009 at 9:40 AM
Isn’t the reason for government health care to provide for a significant portion of people who are not responsible enough to provide themselves health care? If self responsibility is critical and can’t be legislated what’s the point?
Oldnuke on July 20, 2009 at 9:43 AM
Introduce elected government officials to Mr Ruger, Mr Springfield, Mr Smith-Wesson, et. al.
chemman on July 20, 2009 at 10:00 AM
It’s not self-responsibility if it comes down by laws from Congress. What the filthy liar essentially said was that he probably wouldn’t go the way of John Edwards and call for mandatory check-ups as part of the system. He probably wouldn’t impose some federal “snack tax” on foods that his USDA deemed to be too caloric. He probably wouldn’t add further federal taxes on booze and cigarettes. But he never said he wouldn’t do these things.
The filthy liar view himself as the parent with a nation full of infants. He thinks he needs to use a strong hand in implementing this stuff for our own good wether it is the Congressionally-mandated lightbulbs were are going to be forced to buy, the Congressionally-mandated deathtrap we will be forced to drive, or the fact that some bureaucrat is going to make sure you obey the provisions of the new healthcare plan.
In a word, that is tyranny.
highhopes on July 20, 2009 at 10:04 AM
Most School districts already ban selling soda’s at school. They do still sell sports drinks though. Interestingly enough when I point out that sports drinks have more calories per ounce than soda’s administrators and school boards just shrug their shoulders as if I didn’t say anything. BTW I am a runner and running coach and have nothing against sports drinks. I do have something against PC style stupidity.
chemman on July 20, 2009 at 10:05 AM
Wellness Prevention, coupled with counseling of the elderly every five years about assisted death options…makes sense in a terribly fascist sort of way.
As for self-responsibility…this Administration is removing that option from the table in every piece of legislation it is trying to ram through Congress.
coldwarrior on July 20, 2009 at 10:18 AM
Since this piece of carbon pollution was sold to the American people as being the best speaker/communicator that we had ever seen just maybe he should prove it. No pass from me for such a stupid comment. I would like to see him sequestered.
chemman on July 20, 2009 at 10:21 AM
Is Barry going to mandate that everyone participate in group calisthenics each morning? Maybe have ACORN organizers show up each day with a bull horn and call everyone out into the street? Even better, let’s have everyone wear the same clothes, bigger bang when manufacturers only have to make one kind of shoe (boot), one kind of tunic, one kind of uni-sex trousers.
GarandFan on July 20, 2009 at 10:21 AM
Obvious why? He is supposed to be oh so smart and a great speaker. He said what he said. That it makes him look like the piece of carbon pollution that he is isn’t our fault.
chemman on July 20, 2009 at 10:24 AM
Oh the hows of rage and peals of laughter if Bush had said this. But there’s nothing funny about Giggles, is there?
crazy_legs on July 20, 2009 at 10:27 AM
“Stand-up, Chuck! Stand-up and show the folks how good that wellness-prevention program is working for you”.
PatMac on July 20, 2009 at 10:28 AM
We, the taxpayers, are Barack Obama’s employers. When will HE stop smoking for US?
Steve Z on July 20, 2009 at 10:42 AM
This is the 21st Century. They’ll mandate that everybody gather at their televisions or computers each morning to get the daily devotional talking point from the filthy liar, sing the united nations anthem, and perform exercises led by the filthy liar himself or guest hosts that highlight whatever is on the agenda for that day.
highhopes on July 20, 2009 at 10:44 AM
Of course they didn’t say anything. That’s a source of revenue.
Personally, I can see not selling soda in elementary school but sometimes it frightens me at how little self-control we attribute to high schoolers. How do they become functioning adults when they get shielded from the horrors of carbonated beverages until they are 18?
highhopes on July 20, 2009 at 10:50 AM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »