<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: David Keene responds to ACU controversy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/20/david-keene-responds-to-acu-controversy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/20/david-keene-responds-to-acu-controversy/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 13:22:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frum Owes Hannity an Apology &#124; FrumForum</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/20/david-keene-responds-to-acu-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-3382825</link>
		<dc:creator>Frum Owes Hannity an Apology &#124; FrumForum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59412#comment-3382825</guid>
		<description>[...] But as I pointed out to David in my Twitter feed earlier today, the charges against Keene really weren’t “ignored&#8221; by conservatives. They were, in fact, seriously analyzed and discussed by a bevy of conservative journalists and bloggers at the American Spectator, RedState, the Washington Times, Right-Wing News, and elsewhere. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But as I pointed out to David in my Twitter feed earlier today, the charges against Keene really weren’t “ignored&#8221; by conservatives. They were, in fact, seriously analyzed and discussed by a bevy of conservative journalists and bloggers at the American Spectator, RedState, the Washington Times, Right-Wing News, and elsewhere. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Video: UPS vs FedEx</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/20/david-keene-responds-to-acu-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-2933337</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Video: UPS vs FedEx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59412#comment-2933337</guid>
		<description>[...] business from FedEx, in part by offering for sale opinion columns by the ACU&#8217;s board members (see here for the ACU response). Reason TV&#8217;s Nick Gillespie takes us inside the real issues of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] business from FedEx, in part by offering for sale opinion columns by the ACU&#8217;s board members (see here for the ACU response). Reason TV&#8217;s Nick Gillespie takes us inside the real issues of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A few final thoughts on Ziegler, Keene, ACU</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/20/david-keene-responds-to-acu-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-2852124</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A few final thoughts on Ziegler, Keene, ACU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59412#comment-2852124</guid>
		<description>[...] FedEx, for a payment of over $2 million dollars.  Dennis Whitfield, the ACU VP, didn&#8217;t even make the point particularly subtle in the letter: Producing op-eds and articles written by ACU’s Chairman David Keene and / or other [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] FedEx, for a payment of over $2 million dollars.  Dennis Whitfield, the ACU VP, didn&#8217;t even make the point particularly subtle in the letter: Producing op-eds and articles written by ACU’s Chairman David Keene and / or other [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Rogers</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/20/david-keene-responds-to-acu-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-2848673</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59412#comment-2848673</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
Good point Ed. I wonder what companies and organizations Keene’s columns have been sold to and how many others than Fedex have rejected the offer?

edshepp on July 20, 2009 at 8:04 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And GENUINE conservatives wonder how people like Olympia Snowe and Arlen Specter get elected as Republicans???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Good point Ed. I wonder what companies and organizations Keene’s columns have been sold to and how many others than Fedex have rejected the offer?</p>
<p>edshepp on July 20, 2009 at 8:04 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>And GENUINE conservatives wonder how people like Olympia Snowe and Arlen Specter get elected as Republicans???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drama at Western CPAC 2009 Part 1 &#8211; John Ziegler vs David Keene (head of ACU)</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/20/david-keene-responds-to-acu-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-2847166</link>
		<dc:creator>Drama at Western CPAC 2009 Part 1 &#8211; John Ziegler vs David Keene (head of ACU)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59412#comment-2847166</guid>
		<description>[...] and has video footage of the actual incident in which he confronts David Keene over the pay for play allegations, his inaccurate statements about Sarah Palin and his support for the the former Republican senator [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and has video footage of the actual incident in which he confronts David Keene over the pay for play allegations, his inaccurate statements about Sarah Palin and his support for the the former Republican senator [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Be John Galt</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/20/david-keene-responds-to-acu-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-2844627</link>
		<dc:creator>Be John Galt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 01:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59412#comment-2844627</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Police Escort John Ziegler From Western CPAC...&lt;/strong&gt;

John Ziegler, the executive producer of the documentary, Media Malpractice…How Obama Got Elected and Palin Was Targeted, was kicked out of Western CPAC today.   Before Ziegler had to leave, Jim Hoft, the Gateway Pundit, talked with him about his inte...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Police Escort John Ziegler From Western CPAC&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>John Ziegler, the executive producer of the documentary, Media Malpractice…How Obama Got Elected and Palin Was Targeted, was kicked out of Western CPAC today.   Before Ziegler had to leave, Jim Hoft, the Gateway Pundit, talked with him about his inte&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Police Escort John Zeigler From Western CPAC &#124; Be John Galt</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/20/david-keene-responds-to-acu-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-2844612</link>
		<dc:creator>Police Escort John Zeigler From Western CPAC &#124; Be John Galt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 01:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59412#comment-2844612</guid>
		<description>[...] You may remember that David Keene had some problems in July with a controversy involving Fed Ex and UPS. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You may remember that David Keene had some problems in July with a controversy involving Fed Ex and UPS. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cackcon</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/20/david-keene-responds-to-acu-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-2451397</link>
		<dc:creator>cackcon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 01:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59412#comment-2451397</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Even your small fire is explainable on the basis that the reference to The Hill column could’ve been more biographical (how else to sell the effectiveness of a writer?) than an offer to post something in that publication.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Am I allowed to quote myself?  Forgive me, though, if I seem to be holding water for someone I don&#039;t know from Adam.  I just think there was a rush to judgment here.  This is what makes conservative blogging so treacherous: staying on top of a 24-hour &quot;chicken little&quot; news cycle while keeping one&#039;s cool and allowing the truth to sort itself out.  I know you have to keep a web count up, Ed, but it&#039;s important to be careful or to at least be humble if you overreach on a story.

(I&#039;ve done it too--though 20% has been a full time job &quot;on the side&quot; and 20% following Hot Air&#039;s lead--so maybe you&#039;re rubber and I&#039;m glue here.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Even your small fire is explainable on the basis that the reference to The Hill column could’ve been more biographical (how else to sell the effectiveness of a writer?) than an offer to post something in that publication.</p></blockquote>
<p>Am I allowed to quote myself?  Forgive me, though, if I seem to be holding water for someone I don&#8217;t know from Adam.  I just think there was a rush to judgment here.  This is what makes conservative blogging so treacherous: staying on top of a 24-hour &#8220;chicken little&#8221; news cycle while keeping one&#8217;s cool and allowing the truth to sort itself out.  I know you have to keep a web count up, Ed, but it&#8217;s important to be careful or to at least be humble if you overreach on a story.</p>
<p>(I&#8217;ve done it too&#8211;though 20% has been a full time job &#8220;on the side&#8221; and 20% following Hot Air&#8217;s lead&#8211;so maybe you&#8217;re rubber and I&#8217;m glue here.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cackcon</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/20/david-keene-responds-to-acu-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-2451349</link>
		<dc:creator>cackcon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 01:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59412#comment-2451349</guid>
		<description>Ed, this is how you &lt;em&gt;began&lt;/em&gt; your previous post:
&lt;blockquote&gt;According to Politico, the American Conservative Union attempted to get Federal Express to pay millions of dollars to engage the ACU on their behalf over a political fight with UPS on legislation under consideration on Capitol Hill.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Only on your first update did you ask, &lt;em&gt;in passing&lt;/em&gt;, &quot;and why was Whitfield offering Keene’s column for sale in the first place?&quot;

You then proceeded to cite an NRO column which itself indulged in a fair amount of speculation, but speculation regarding ACU&#039;s &lt;em&gt;adherence to political influence over conservative principles&lt;/em&gt;.  But that&#039;s no different than the usual conservative complaint about &lt;em&gt;the Republican Party&lt;/em&gt;.

Face it, you were happy to lead with smoke, which then yielded &lt;em&gt;at most&lt;/em&gt; a small fire.  (It was very Fox News of you--not that I don&#039;t like FN, I just know they&#039;re over the top.)

Even your small fire is explainable on the basis that the reference to &lt;em&gt;The Hill&lt;/em&gt; column could&#039;ve been more biographical (how else to sell the effectiveness of a writer?) than an offer to post something &lt;em&gt;in that publication&lt;/em&gt;.

You complain that no explanation was offered regarding this particular detail, yet that&#039;s how leftists score points on conservatives all the time.  It&#039;s hard to correct the record with facts when the accusations are all over the place.

Every other main point was addressed by Mr. Keene.  Maybe &lt;em&gt;you&lt;/em&gt; need to go &lt;em&gt;his&lt;/em&gt; way a bit and indulge rather than indict.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed, this is how you <em>began</em> your previous post:</p>
<blockquote><p>According to Politico, the American Conservative Union attempted to get Federal Express to pay millions of dollars to engage the ACU on their behalf over a political fight with UPS on legislation under consideration on Capitol Hill.</p></blockquote>
<p>Only on your first update did you ask, <em>in passing</em>, &#8220;and why was Whitfield offering Keene’s column for sale in the first place?&#8221;</p>
<p>You then proceeded to cite an NRO column which itself indulged in a fair amount of speculation, but speculation regarding ACU&#8217;s <em>adherence to political influence over conservative principles</em>.  But that&#8217;s no different than the usual conservative complaint about <em>the Republican Party</em>.</p>
<p>Face it, you were happy to lead with smoke, which then yielded <em>at most</em> a small fire.  (It was very Fox News of you&#8211;not that I don&#8217;t like FN, I just know they&#8217;re over the top.)</p>
<p>Even your small fire is explainable on the basis that the reference to <em>The Hill</em> column could&#8217;ve been more biographical (how else to sell the effectiveness of a writer?) than an offer to post something <em>in that publication</em>.</p>
<p>You complain that no explanation was offered regarding this particular detail, yet that&#8217;s how leftists score points on conservatives all the time.  It&#8217;s hard to correct the record with facts when the accusations are all over the place.</p>
<p>Every other main point was addressed by Mr. Keene.  Maybe <em>you</em> need to go <em>his</em> way a bit and indulge rather than indict.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InTheBellyoftheBeast</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/20/david-keene-responds-to-acu-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-2451061</link>
		<dc:creator>InTheBellyoftheBeast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59412#comment-2451061</guid>
		<description>Just following the timeline on this makes it fairly clear that Keene has his facts straight. Politico needs to generate ink - thus, obscuring and inferring lead to impuning Keene&#039;s character. Keene is a good man, smart and politically savvy. This just isn&#039;t passing the smell test. When the laundry is done on this I&#039;ll bet we will see that Keene is right, and was wronged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just following the timeline on this makes it fairly clear that Keene has his facts straight. Politico needs to generate ink &#8211; thus, obscuring and inferring lead to impuning Keene&#8217;s character. Keene is a good man, smart and politically savvy. This just isn&#8217;t passing the smell test. When the laundry is done on this I&#8217;ll bet we will see that Keene is right, and was wronged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidk</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/20/david-keene-responds-to-acu-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-2450936</link>
		<dc:creator>davidk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59412#comment-2450936</guid>
		<description>Huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edshepp</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/20/david-keene-responds-to-acu-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-2450886</link>
		<dc:creator>edshepp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59412#comment-2450886</guid>
		<description>Good point Ed. I wonder what companies and organizations Keene&#039;s columns have been sold to and how many others than Fedex have rejected the offer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Ed. I wonder what companies and organizations Keene&#8217;s columns have been sold to and how many others than Fedex have rejected the offer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Minardi</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/20/david-keene-responds-to-acu-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-2450698</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Minardi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 23:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59412#comment-2450698</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s saying that people rushed to judgment on calling him a flip-flopper.  He&#039;s right about that.  And it also sort of looks like the ACU was trying to distance themselves from him, because they didn&#039;t seem to have read the letter and defend him from the charge that he was taking a position directly opposite theirs.

Maintaining your position and asking for funding isn&#039;t that big a deal, and when you tailor your priorities to support constituents who support you I still don&#039;t think it&#039;s that big of a deal as long as you aren&#039;t shifting your position based on whose support you can get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s saying that people rushed to judgment on calling him a flip-flopper.  He&#8217;s right about that.  And it also sort of looks like the ACU was trying to distance themselves from him, because they didn&#8217;t seem to have read the letter and defend him from the charge that he was taking a position directly opposite theirs.</p>
<p>Maintaining your position and asking for funding isn&#8217;t that big a deal, and when you tailor your priorities to support constituents who support you I still don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s that big of a deal as long as you aren&#8217;t shifting your position based on whose support you can get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SouthernGent</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/20/david-keene-responds-to-acu-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-2450518</link>
		<dc:creator>SouthernGent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 23:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59412#comment-2450518</guid>
		<description>I prefer to believe Keene over Politico.  Sue me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer to believe Keene over Politico.  Sue me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrye</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/20/david-keene-responds-to-acu-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-2450492</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 23:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59412#comment-2450492</guid>
		<description>I think some folks on the right are all too willing to believe bad press of their own. That does not mean they need to whitewash people, but every now and then they could think about giving the benefit of the doubt. Politico is not exactly above creating a scandal where none exists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think some folks on the right are all too willing to believe bad press of their own. That does not mean they need to whitewash people, but every now and then they could think about giving the benefit of the doubt. Politico is not exactly above creating a scandal where none exists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Morrissey</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/20/david-keene-responds-to-acu-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-2450374</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 22:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59412#comment-2450374</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Ed, if you done the same investigation yourself and focused in on the more nuanced (and far less egregious) “hint” of impropriety regarding Mr. Keene’s column, you would have spared a considerable amount of misinformation being spread among conservatives.

cackcon on July 20, 2009 at 6:34 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sorry, I don&#039;t buy it.  The ACU was selling their program with an explicit sweetener of having Keene promote their cause through &quot;op-eds and articles&quot;.  That&#039;s pay-for-play, unless a disclaimer of their relationship would be included -- and I doubt The Hill would have allowed Keene to have something like that published.  And I note that this is the one point Keene &lt;em&gt;doesn&#039;t&lt;/em&gt; address in this lengthy response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Ed, if you done the same investigation yourself and focused in on the more nuanced (and far less egregious) “hint” of impropriety regarding Mr. Keene’s column, you would have spared a considerable amount of misinformation being spread among conservatives.</p>
<p>cackcon on July 20, 2009 at 6:34 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Sorry, I don&#8217;t buy it.  The ACU was selling their program with an explicit sweetener of having Keene promote their cause through &#8220;op-eds and articles&#8221;.  That&#8217;s pay-for-play, unless a disclaimer of their relationship would be included &#8212; and I doubt The Hill would have allowed Keene to have something like that published.  And I note that this is the one point Keene <em>doesn&#8217;t</em> address in this lengthy response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry_Dyne</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/20/david-keene-responds-to-acu-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-2450350</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry_Dyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 22:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59412#comment-2450350</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
David Keene
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Now offering a &quot;real girlfriend experience&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
David Keene
</p></blockquote>
<p>Now offering a &#8220;real girlfriend experience&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apologetic California</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/20/david-keene-responds-to-acu-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-2450335</link>
		<dc:creator>Apologetic California</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 22:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59412#comment-2450335</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Whore&lt;/strong&gt;.

That&#039;s all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Whore</strong>.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cackcon</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/20/david-keene-responds-to-acu-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-2450328</link>
		<dc:creator>cackcon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 22:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59412#comment-2450328</guid>
		<description>&quot;Strongly implied&quot; is a far cry from what Politico was reporting in its attempt to smear a conservative organization.  I took five minutes on my blog Friday (?) to debunk the bulk of Politico&#039;s reported &quot;scandal,&quot; pretty much covering &lt;em&gt;exactly&lt;/em&gt; what appears in Mr. Keene&#039;s response above.

Ed, if you done the same investigation yourself and focused in on the more nuanced (and far less egregious) &quot;hint&quot; of impropriety regarding Mr. Keene&#039;s column, you would have spared a considerable amount of misinformation being spread among conservatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Strongly implied&#8221; is a far cry from what Politico was reporting in its attempt to smear a conservative organization.  I took five minutes on my blog Friday (?) to debunk the bulk of Politico&#8217;s reported &#8220;scandal,&#8221; pretty much covering <em>exactly</em> what appears in Mr. Keene&#8217;s response above.</p>
<p>Ed, if you done the same investigation yourself and focused in on the more nuanced (and far less egregious) &#8220;hint&#8221; of impropriety regarding Mr. Keene&#8217;s column, you would have spared a considerable amount of misinformation being spread among conservatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris_Balsz</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/20/david-keene-responds-to-acu-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-2450326</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris_Balsz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 22:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59412#comment-2450326</guid>
		<description>From everything HotAir has posted and linked to, Mr. Keene seems to have difficulty distinguishing between an ACU action taken by its chairman, and Mr. David Keene, who you may remember is chairman of the ACU.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From everything HotAir has posted and linked to, Mr. Keene seems to have difficulty distinguishing between an ACU action taken by its chairman, and Mr. David Keene, who you may remember is chairman of the ACU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;The whole thing is noxious.&#8221; &#8230;updated &#171; Gunservatively!</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/20/david-keene-responds-to-acu-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-2450320</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;The whole thing is noxious.&#8221; &#8230;updated &#171; Gunservatively!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 22:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59412#comment-2450320</guid>
		<description>[...] David Keene responds. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] David Keene responds. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pabarge</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/20/david-keene-responds-to-acu-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-2450308</link>
		<dc:creator>pabarge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 22:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59412#comment-2450308</guid>
		<description>David Keene is done, toast, finished.

Get out, Keene. Hit the road and don&#039;t come back.

We have enough lack or morality in American leftism. There is no room for it in American Conservatism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Keene is done, toast, finished.</p>
<p>Get out, Keene. Hit the road and don&#8217;t come back.</p>
<p>We have enough lack or morality in American leftism. There is no room for it in American Conservatism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abby Adams</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/20/david-keene-responds-to-acu-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-2450292</link>
		<dc:creator>Abby Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 22:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59412#comment-2450292</guid>
		<description>Like clockwork. 

The clues, I have them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like clockwork. </p>
<p>The clues, I have them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
