<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Great news: Amazon remotely deleting books from users&#8217; Kindles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/18/great-news-amazon-remotely-deleting-books-downloaded-to-users-kindles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/18/great-news-amazon-remotely-deleting-books-downloaded-to-users-kindles/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 18:03:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Jeff Bezos on Amazon remotely deleting Kindle books: We&#8217;re idiots</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/18/great-news-amazon-remotely-deleting-books-downloaded-to-users-kindles/comment-page-3/#comment-2473750</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Jeff Bezos on Amazon remotely deleting Kindle books: We&#8217;re idiots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 23:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59275#comment-2473750</guid>
		<description>[...] beat on him last week for the Orwell clusterfark so we owe him a link to his attempt to make amends. I wanted [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] beat on him last week for the Orwell clusterfark so we owe him a link to his attempt to make amends. I wanted [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Amazon Is Watching You! &#171; Around The Sphere</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/18/great-news-amazon-remotely-deleting-books-downloaded-to-users-kindles/comment-page-3/#comment-2450073</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Amazon Is Watching You! &#171; Around The Sphere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 21:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59275#comment-2450073</guid>
		<description>[...] Allah Pundit: The counterargument, per Instapundit’s wife, is that Amazon’s actually protecting property rights by yanking stuff that violates copyright out of people’s hands. Technically true, but commercial law has traditionally let purchasers of stolen goods keep them so long as they made the purchase in “good faith.” Click here and scroll down for a legal explanation of the term or see, e.g., sections 1-201(9) and 2-403 of the Uniform Commercial Code. If the holder of the Orwell copyright wants justice, by all means let him sue Amazon and the unlicensed publisher of the digital books for damages. That’s the surest way to get Bezos and company to more closely police the copyright status of books being sold in their Kindle store. Why they’re not already doing that is frankly unfathomable to me, but doubly unfathomable is them reaching into your virtual bookshelf to forcibly repurchase a book you’ve already bought. Exit question: Is this a dealbreaker for would-be Kindle purchasers? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Allah Pundit: The counterargument, per Instapundit’s wife, is that Amazon’s actually protecting property rights by yanking stuff that violates copyright out of people’s hands. Technically true, but commercial law has traditionally let purchasers of stolen goods keep them so long as they made the purchase in “good faith.” Click here and scroll down for a legal explanation of the term or see, e.g., sections 1-201(9) and 2-403 of the Uniform Commercial Code. If the holder of the Orwell copyright wants justice, by all means let him sue Amazon and the unlicensed publisher of the digital books for damages. That’s the surest way to get Bezos and company to more closely police the copyright status of books being sold in their Kindle store. Why they’re not already doing that is frankly unfathomable to me, but doubly unfathomable is them reaching into your virtual bookshelf to forcibly repurchase a book you’ve already bought. Exit question: Is this a dealbreaker for would-be Kindle purchasers? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kindle Swindle? - The Opinionator Blog - NYTimes.com</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/18/great-news-amazon-remotely-deleting-books-downloaded-to-users-kindles/comment-page-3/#comment-2449176</link>
		<dc:creator>Kindle Swindle? - The Opinionator Blog - NYTimes.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 19:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59275#comment-2449176</guid>
		<description>[...] thick with the words &#8220;irony&#8221; and &#8220;Orwellian.&#8221; Jeff Bezos got called &#8220;Big Brother.&#8221; And blogger James Grimmelmann got to say, I told you [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] thick with the words &#8220;irony&#8221; and &#8220;Orwellian.&#8221; Jeff Bezos got called &#8220;Big Brother.&#8221; And blogger James Grimmelmann got to say, I told you [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2nd Ammendment Mother</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/18/great-news-amazon-remotely-deleting-books-downloaded-to-users-kindles/comment-page-3/#comment-2447881</link>
		<dc:creator>2nd Ammendment Mother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59275#comment-2447881</guid>
		<description>and just as a sidenote:

If it&#039;s a really important book, I&#039;m going to buy a hard copy and preserve anyway.  Otherwise, there is just a lot of stuff I read for fun and will never read again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and just as a sidenote:</p>
<p>If it&#8217;s a really important book, I&#8217;m going to buy a hard copy and preserve anyway.  Otherwise, there is just a lot of stuff I read for fun and will never read again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2nd Ammendment Mother</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/18/great-news-amazon-remotely-deleting-books-downloaded-to-users-kindles/comment-page-3/#comment-2447875</link>
		<dc:creator>2nd Ammendment Mother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59275#comment-2447875</guid>
		<description>I think that the two titles were quite ironic.  I back all my books up onto a separate SD card, especially my notes.  As long as I get a reasonable explanation (and this was one) and a refund, I&#039;d consider this one a &quot;things happen&quot; issue and let it go.  (I would have probably been less nice if I had been the kid working on an assignment... my son uses my Kindle for the same thing.)  If it continues to happen, then we have a problem.  Currently, I have over 600 titles over the last 2 years on my Kindle.  I&#039;ve gotten great customer service and so far I&#039;m pretty happy.  So I guess, we&#039;ll see what happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the two titles were quite ironic.  I back all my books up onto a separate SD card, especially my notes.  As long as I get a reasonable explanation (and this was one) and a refund, I&#8217;d consider this one a &#8220;things happen&#8221; issue and let it go.  (I would have probably been less nice if I had been the kid working on an assignment&#8230; my son uses my Kindle for the same thing.)  If it continues to happen, then we have a problem.  Currently, I have over 600 titles over the last 2 years on my Kindle.  I&#8217;ve gotten great customer service and so far I&#8217;m pretty happy.  So I guess, we&#8217;ll see what happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PappaMac</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/18/great-news-amazon-remotely-deleting-books-downloaded-to-users-kindles/comment-page-3/#comment-2447837</link>
		<dc:creator>PappaMac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59275#comment-2447837</guid>
		<description>Electronic Book Burning. (EBB)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Electronic Book Burning. (EBB)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bludgeon</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/18/great-news-amazon-remotely-deleting-books-downloaded-to-users-kindles/comment-page-3/#comment-2447672</link>
		<dc:creator>Bludgeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59275#comment-2447672</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;entagor on July 20, 2009 at 8:19 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You said it better, but I&#039;ll spout off too.

I&#039;m also concerned about the apparent ability to edit, without your knowledge, books that you&#039;ve bought.  Sure, it would be nice to be able to fix typos, but who&#039;s to say that they wouldn&#039;t remove an &quot;offensive&quot; paragraph or line of dialog from a classic novel?

Printed books provide us with a record of who we were, where we came from, what we&#039;ve gained and what we&#039;ve lost.  We can&#039;t afford to loose that.  This is a bit melodramatic, but I tend to get that way over our society&#039;s lack of appreciation for history.

I happen to have all 10 volumes of the 1927 edition of The Standard History of the World, subtitled &quot;A narrative of political events and a record of civilization from the earliest historical period to the present, embracing a general survey of human progress and achievement, civil government, religion, literature, science and art.&quot; It concludes with formation of the League of Nations.  You have to know that has things in it that some would wish to edit today.

Straying a bit from the topic, what calculators did to math education, search engines have done to history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>entagor on July 20, 2009 at 8:19 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>You said it better, but I&#8217;ll spout off too.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also concerned about the apparent ability to edit, without your knowledge, books that you&#8217;ve bought.  Sure, it would be nice to be able to fix typos, but who&#8217;s to say that they wouldn&#8217;t remove an &#8220;offensive&#8221; paragraph or line of dialog from a classic novel?</p>
<p>Printed books provide us with a record of who we were, where we came from, what we&#8217;ve gained and what we&#8217;ve lost.  We can&#8217;t afford to loose that.  This is a bit melodramatic, but I tend to get that way over our society&#8217;s lack of appreciation for history.</p>
<p>I happen to have all 10 volumes of the 1927 edition of The Standard History of the World, subtitled &#8220;A narrative of political events and a record of civilization from the earliest historical period to the present, embracing a general survey of human progress and achievement, civil government, religion, literature, science and art.&#8221; It concludes with formation of the League of Nations.  You have to know that has things in it that some would wish to edit today.</p>
<p>Straying a bit from the topic, what calculators did to math education, search engines have done to history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trochilus</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/18/great-news-amazon-remotely-deleting-books-downloaded-to-users-kindles/comment-page-3/#comment-2447509</link>
		<dc:creator>Trochilus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59275#comment-2447509</guid>
		<description>Imagine for a moment, if you will, &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Amazon&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; having sent the book police around to round up any hard-back copies that they might have sold in violation of copyright, had this instead involved paper copies!  

It just would not have happened.  

Oh, they might have sent out letters requesting, perhaps even &quot;demanding&quot; their return.  But more likely, they would have worked out some formula for damages to the copyright owner based on copies improperly sold -- depending, of course, on how persistently the copyright owner persued the matter.  

But in this case, &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Amazon&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; over-reacted because . . . well, they could.  

I sense they felt compelled to follow completely through once the focus was on them.  And even though they no doubt had thought it through -- in the sense that they knew it was trouble -- they still acted.  

They had to have been focused so exclusively on avoiding any possibility of a further economic comeback by the copyright owner, that they acted even though they may have only marginally underestimated the public relations disaster it would cause them.  Their choice came down to their own economic protection.  And they felt justified because they convinced themselves they were legally in the right.  And that overrode all else.

Reminded me a little bit of another Orwellian tale, a short story that I hadn&#039;t read in years . . . &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks02/0200141.txt&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Shooting An Elephant&lt;/a&gt;.&quot;  

Thanks for the general link to the &lt;em&gt;Project Gutenberg Australia&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;Dr Evil&lt;/strong&gt; on July 19, 2009 at 9:03 AM.  

Anyone can pick up the link to the short story there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine for a moment, if you will, <em><strong>Amazon</strong></em> having sent the book police around to round up any hard-back copies that they might have sold in violation of copyright, had this instead involved paper copies!  </p>
<p>It just would not have happened.  </p>
<p>Oh, they might have sent out letters requesting, perhaps even &#8220;demanding&#8221; their return.  But more likely, they would have worked out some formula for damages to the copyright owner based on copies improperly sold &#8212; depending, of course, on how persistently the copyright owner persued the matter.  </p>
<p>But in this case, <em><strong>Amazon</strong></em> over-reacted because . . . well, they could.  </p>
<p>I sense they felt compelled to follow completely through once the focus was on them.  And even though they no doubt had thought it through &#8212; in the sense that they knew it was trouble &#8212; they still acted.  </p>
<p>They had to have been focused so exclusively on avoiding any possibility of a further economic comeback by the copyright owner, that they acted even though they may have only marginally underestimated the public relations disaster it would cause them.  Their choice came down to their own economic protection.  And they felt justified because they convinced themselves they were legally in the right.  And that overrode all else.</p>
<p>Reminded me a little bit of another Orwellian tale, a short story that I hadn&#8217;t read in years . . . &#8220;<a href="http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks02/0200141.txt" rel="nofollow">Shooting An Elephant</a>.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Thanks for the general link to the <em>Project Gutenberg Australia</em>, <strong>Dr Evil</strong> on July 19, 2009 at 9:03 AM.  </p>
<p>Anyone can pick up the link to the short story there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SKYFOX</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/18/great-news-amazon-remotely-deleting-books-downloaded-to-users-kindles/comment-page-3/#comment-2447422</link>
		<dc:creator>SKYFOX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59275#comment-2447422</guid>
		<description>This technological dinosaur was unaware of the existence of such a thing.  Seems like a great idea, but not under these conditions.  No thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This technological dinosaur was unaware of the existence of such a thing.  Seems like a great idea, but not under these conditions.  No thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: entagor</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/18/great-news-amazon-remotely-deleting-books-downloaded-to-users-kindles/comment-page-3/#comment-2447383</link>
		<dc:creator>entagor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59275#comment-2447383</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Wherever you come down on this issue, remember this. Amazon revealed something very important. They can promise all they want to never do it again, but they have the power to do it, any time they want to

Feedie on July 19, 2009 at 2:09 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I am not saying they can, but what if - 

they could pull a part of a text anytime?

Who would miss small deletions, subtle changes in nuance, or progressive re writes?

This is happening in Bible translation, and is little publicized, as Bible publishing houses substitute words for more &#039;meaningful&#039; words unbeknownst in some cases to the readers

Seems to me we are approaching a point where the purchase of print may become no guarantee of the content</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Wherever you come down on this issue, remember this. Amazon revealed something very important. They can promise all they want to never do it again, but they have the power to do it, any time they want to</p>
<p>Feedie on July 19, 2009 at 2:09 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>I am not saying they can, but what if &#8211; </p>
<p>they could pull a part of a text anytime?</p>
<p>Who would miss small deletions, subtle changes in nuance, or progressive re writes?</p>
<p>This is happening in Bible translation, and is little publicized, as Bible publishing houses substitute words for more &#8216;meaningful&#8217; words unbeknownst in some cases to the readers</p>
<p>Seems to me we are approaching a point where the purchase of print may become no guarantee of the content</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dcpolwarth</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/18/great-news-amazon-remotely-deleting-books-downloaded-to-users-kindles/comment-page-3/#comment-2447292</link>
		<dc:creator>dcpolwarth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 07:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59275#comment-2447292</guid>
		<description>I bagged myself a Sony 505 ereader in the Play.com sale in the UK, and it is fantastic.

For those of you who are still skeptical about ereaders, they are much better than you might imagine.  For one thing, the screen is not a standard LCD display - they have worked on the technology to make it easy on the eye.  The Sony screen is more like an etch-a-sketch display than a regular monitor screen.

It is also surprisingly easy to get used to the ereader format.  You just don&#039;t notice it after a while, as if you are using a book.

There are some gripes: it can read PDF documents so I&#039;ve uploaded all my music software manuals onto it (Cubase 5, Native Instruments Komplete 5 etc.), but the small display struggles with making them readable.  You can zoom in, but it rearranges the format and you sometimes lose images when you do.  So PDF is not perfect.

Would I buy a Kindle after their deletion strategy?  Of course.  The whole point is that the books you buy are all essentially dependent on DRM, and DRM can be made obselete very quickly.  Its quite possible the books you download today will not be readable in a few years because the DRM format will have changed.  Its a risk you take with anything digital.  

To be fair, books do decay and get grotty too if you don&#039;t look after them.  And if you read them a lot they do get worn.  Digital doesn&#039;t - the format just winks out of existence.

Go and get one if you don&#039;t have one already.  It&#039;s renewed my love for reading.  Dostoevsky&#039;s Crime and Punishment beckons as I write.  Just don&#039;t buy anything important on digital format - keep your essential documents on paper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bagged myself a Sony 505 ereader in the Play.com sale in the UK, and it is fantastic.</p>
<p>For those of you who are still skeptical about ereaders, they are much better than you might imagine.  For one thing, the screen is not a standard LCD display &#8211; they have worked on the technology to make it easy on the eye.  The Sony screen is more like an etch-a-sketch display than a regular monitor screen.</p>
<p>It is also surprisingly easy to get used to the ereader format.  You just don&#8217;t notice it after a while, as if you are using a book.</p>
<p>There are some gripes: it can read PDF documents so I&#8217;ve uploaded all my music software manuals onto it (Cubase 5, Native Instruments Komplete 5 etc.), but the small display struggles with making them readable.  You can zoom in, but it rearranges the format and you sometimes lose images when you do.  So PDF is not perfect.</p>
<p>Would I buy a Kindle after their deletion strategy?  Of course.  The whole point is that the books you buy are all essentially dependent on DRM, and DRM can be made obselete very quickly.  Its quite possible the books you download today will not be readable in a few years because the DRM format will have changed.  Its a risk you take with anything digital.  </p>
<p>To be fair, books do decay and get grotty too if you don&#8217;t look after them.  And if you read them a lot they do get worn.  Digital doesn&#8217;t &#8211; the format just winks out of existence.</p>
<p>Go and get one if you don&#8217;t have one already.  It&#8217;s renewed my love for reading.  Dostoevsky&#8217;s Crime and Punishment beckons as I write.  Just don&#8217;t buy anything important on digital format &#8211; keep your essential documents on paper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: profitsbeard</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/18/great-news-amazon-remotely-deleting-books-downloaded-to-users-kindles/comment-page-3/#comment-2447039</link>
		<dc:creator>profitsbeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 04:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59275#comment-2447039</guid>
		<description>I had a great comment, &lt;em&gt;but Amazon took it&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a great comment, <em>but Amazon took it</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4shoes</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/18/great-news-amazon-remotely-deleting-books-downloaded-to-users-kindles/comment-page-3/#comment-2446734</link>
		<dc:creator>4shoes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 02:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59275#comment-2446734</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;BrideOfRove on July 19, 2009 at 10:47 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Very informative and amusing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>BrideOfRove on July 19, 2009 at 10:47 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Very informative and amusing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skydaddy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/18/great-news-amazon-remotely-deleting-books-downloaded-to-users-kindles/comment-page-3/#comment-2446719</link>
		<dc:creator>skydaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 02:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59275#comment-2446719</guid>
		<description>Deal breaker?  Absolutely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deal breaker?  Absolutely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On Watch</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/18/great-news-amazon-remotely-deleting-books-downloaded-to-users-kindles/comment-page-3/#comment-2446475</link>
		<dc:creator>On Watch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 00:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59275#comment-2446475</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Wherever you come down on this issue, remember this. &lt;em&gt;Amazon revealed something very important&lt;/em&gt;. They can promise all they want to never do it again, but &lt;strong&gt;they have the power to do it, any time they want to.&lt;/strong&gt;... Feedie on July 19, 2009 at 2:09 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Bullseye!

Reminds me of &lt;em&gt;&quot;Prodigy&quot;&lt;/em&gt;&#039;s heavy handed practices back in the day. How did that venture turn out for IBM/Sears?

As for Amazon they&#039;d better do some bowing and scraping to the offended customers - starting with a gift certificate for a years worth of FREE top-shelf book downloads! Also, a public lynching of the exec(bigbrother) that ordered the snatch would be an enjoyable youtube production... Last, an ironclad/boilerplate legal committment to never play that &quot;memory hole&quot; trick again would be in order!

&lt;em&gt;&quot;Let&#039;s Roll&quot;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Wherever you come down on this issue, remember this. <em>Amazon revealed something very important</em>. They can promise all they want to never do it again, but <strong>they have the power to do it, any time they want to.</strong>&#8230; Feedie on July 19, 2009 at 2:09 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Bullseye!</p>
<p>Reminds me of <em>&#8220;Prodigy&#8221;</em>&#8216;s heavy handed practices back in the day. How did that venture turn out for IBM/Sears?</p>
<p>As for Amazon they&#8217;d better do some bowing and scraping to the offended customers &#8211; starting with a gift certificate for a years worth of FREE top-shelf book downloads! Also, a public lynching of the exec(bigbrother) that ordered the snatch would be an enjoyable youtube production&#8230; Last, an ironclad/boilerplate legal committment to never play that &#8220;memory hole&#8221; trick again would be in order!</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Let&#8217;s Roll&#8221;</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservativesailor</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/18/great-news-amazon-remotely-deleting-books-downloaded-to-users-kindles/comment-page-3/#comment-2446412</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservativesailor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 22:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59275#comment-2446412</guid>
		<description>ITS ALL GEORGE BUSH&#039;S FAULT, HIM AND HIS EVIL VICE PRESIDENT!!

WAKE UP PEOPLE, LOOK AT THE TITLES OF THE BOOKS???
HAVE YOU EVER READ 1984???
SOMEONE DOESNT WANT THESE BOOKS SOLD AT ALL, AND CERTAINLY NOT IN A ELECTRNIC MEDIA FORMAT.
GO DOWN TO THE BOOK STORE AND BUY THESE BOOKS AND READ THEM, THEN LOOK AT THE WAY OUR GREAT COUNTRY IS HEADED</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ITS ALL GEORGE BUSH&#8217;S FAULT, HIM AND HIS EVIL VICE PRESIDENT!!</p>
<p>WAKE UP PEOPLE, LOOK AT THE TITLES OF THE BOOKS???<br />
HAVE YOU EVER READ 1984???<br />
SOMEONE DOESNT WANT THESE BOOKS SOLD AT ALL, AND CERTAINLY NOT IN A ELECTRNIC MEDIA FORMAT.<br />
GO DOWN TO THE BOOK STORE AND BUY THESE BOOKS AND READ THEM, THEN LOOK AT THE WAY OUR GREAT COUNTRY IS HEADED</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aronne</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/18/great-news-amazon-remotely-deleting-books-downloaded-to-users-kindles/comment-page-3/#comment-2446370</link>
		<dc:creator>Aronne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59275#comment-2446370</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Exit question: Is this a dealbreaker for would-be Kindle purchasers?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

What would-be Kindle purchasers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Exit question: Is this a dealbreaker for would-be Kindle purchasers?</p></blockquote>
<p>What would-be Kindle purchasers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrideOfRove</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/18/great-news-amazon-remotely-deleting-books-downloaded-to-users-kindles/comment-page-3/#comment-2446336</link>
		<dc:creator>BrideOfRove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59275#comment-2446336</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Geministorm on July 19, 2009 at 3:30 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://my.safaribooksonline.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Safari&lt;/a&gt;

Worth every dime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Geministorm on July 19, 2009 at 3:30 PM</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://my.safaribooksonline.com/" rel="nofollow">Safari</a></p>
<p>Worth every dime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grafted</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/18/great-news-amazon-remotely-deleting-books-downloaded-to-users-kindles/comment-page-3/#comment-2446236</link>
		<dc:creator>Grafted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 19:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59275#comment-2446236</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Is this a dealbreaker for would-be Kindle purchasers?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The deal-breaker for me is an electronic book.  Paper for me, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Is this a dealbreaker for would-be Kindle purchasers?</p></blockquote>
<p>The deal-breaker for me is an electronic book.  Paper for me, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geministorm</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/18/great-news-amazon-remotely-deleting-books-downloaded-to-users-kindles/comment-page-3/#comment-2446215</link>
		<dc:creator>Geministorm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 19:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59275#comment-2446215</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;    Otherwise, who reads more than one book at a time…

    SilverStar830 on July 19, 2009 at 12:12 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Me. I&#039;m currently reading 4 books, 3 for reading enjoyment, one for work/professional. Only the technical book is paper, the others are all on my iPhone, which I&#039;m reading with Stanza. I got rid of my 46&quot; DLP TV a few months ago, since then reading books has become more of an obsession than any time since I graduated. I used to have more books than I could shelf (even after I would go out and buy more 8&#039;x4&#039; book cases), and I would find that I had accumulated box upon box of books that weigh a ton. Moving those books out of the way to reach the Christmas paraphenalia this last year is what convinced me to finally go digital. Right now I&#039;ve got 157 books downloaded and able to be read at my leisure. When I&#039;m sitting in an airport, on the plane, in a hotel room, at a restaurant if I&#039;m alone, late at night when the kids and wife are asleep but I&#039;m not, when I&#039;m in the &quot;library&quot; (a guy&#039;s favorite reading place), etc. Having the book(s) you&#039;re reading handy whenever you want to read...I have to say that eBooks are even more awesome than Pandora/mp3s for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>    Otherwise, who reads more than one book at a time…</p>
<p>    SilverStar830 on July 19, 2009 at 12:12 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Me. I&#8217;m currently reading 4 books, 3 for reading enjoyment, one for work/professional. Only the technical book is paper, the others are all on my iPhone, which I&#8217;m reading with Stanza. I got rid of my 46&#8243; DLP TV a few months ago, since then reading books has become more of an obsession than any time since I graduated. I used to have more books than I could shelf (even after I would go out and buy more 8&#8242;x4&#8242; book cases), and I would find that I had accumulated box upon box of books that weigh a ton. Moving those books out of the way to reach the Christmas paraphenalia this last year is what convinced me to finally go digital. Right now I&#8217;ve got 157 books downloaded and able to be read at my leisure. When I&#8217;m sitting in an airport, on the plane, in a hotel room, at a restaurant if I&#8217;m alone, late at night when the kids and wife are asleep but I&#8217;m not, when I&#8217;m in the &#8220;library&#8221; (a guy&#8217;s favorite reading place), etc. Having the book(s) you&#8217;re reading handy whenever you want to read&#8230;I have to say that eBooks are even more awesome than Pandora/mp3s for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merovign</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/18/great-news-amazon-remotely-deleting-books-downloaded-to-users-kindles/comment-page-3/#comment-2446028</link>
		<dc:creator>Merovign</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 18:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59275#comment-2446028</guid>
		<description>Too many other options to waste my time on Amazon. I do like their grocery website, however - stores around here keep dropping stuff I like.

Anyway, many moons ago I used to use a palm IIIc as an eBook. Not like the modern ones, but not bad either. PDAs, tablets, etc... and none of them single-purpose consumer devices that cost too much for what they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too many other options to waste my time on Amazon. I do like their grocery website, however &#8211; stores around here keep dropping stuff I like.</p>
<p>Anyway, many moons ago I used to use a palm IIIc as an eBook. Not like the modern ones, but not bad either. PDAs, tablets, etc&#8230; and none of them single-purpose consumer devices that cost too much for what they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pythagoras</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/18/great-news-amazon-remotely-deleting-books-downloaded-to-users-kindles/comment-page-3/#comment-2446019</link>
		<dc:creator>Pythagoras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 18:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59275#comment-2446019</guid>
		<description>In &quot;The Tipping Point&quot; Malcolm Gladwell explains how folks who buy new products are often &quot;mavens&quot; (people who, as social leaders, set trends).  Accordingly, this could be a BIG mistake by Amazon.

In the epilogue in the paperback edition he tells of how Lexus went overboard during their first recall to make their customers happy.  What could have been a PR disaster was, instead, a non-event.

Amazon needs to think of a way to emulate that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In &#8220;The Tipping Point&#8221; Malcolm Gladwell explains how folks who buy new products are often &#8220;mavens&#8221; (people who, as social leaders, set trends).  Accordingly, this could be a BIG mistake by Amazon.</p>
<p>In the epilogue in the paperback edition he tells of how Lexus went overboard during their first recall to make their customers happy.  What could have been a PR disaster was, instead, a non-event.</p>
<p>Amazon needs to think of a way to emulate that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: myrenovations</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/18/great-news-amazon-remotely-deleting-books-downloaded-to-users-kindles/comment-page-3/#comment-2446001</link>
		<dc:creator>myrenovations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59275#comment-2446001</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Otherwise, who reads more than one book at a time...

SilverStar830 on July 19, 2009 at 12:12 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Me.  I have a book on the nightstand for my night reading.  A book in the car to read when I am waiting to pick up the spouse.  A book on my desk to read while I am waiting during slow internet times.  A book on the coffee table to read while I am &quot;watching&quot; a show the spouse has chosen.  And a book in my backpack that I carry with me in case I have to wait at a doctor&#039;s office or some such.

But I still don&#039;t want a Kindle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Otherwise, who reads more than one book at a time&#8230;</p>
<p>SilverStar830 on July 19, 2009 at 12:12 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Me.  I have a book on the nightstand for my night reading.  A book in the car to read when I am waiting to pick up the spouse.  A book on my desk to read while I am waiting during slow internet times.  A book on the coffee table to read while I am &#8220;watching&#8221; a show the spouse has chosen.  And a book in my backpack that I carry with me in case I have to wait at a doctor&#8217;s office or some such.</p>
<p>But I still don&#8217;t want a Kindle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geministorm</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/18/great-news-amazon-remotely-deleting-books-downloaded-to-users-kindles/comment-page-3/#comment-2445912</link>
		<dc:creator>Geministorm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59275#comment-2445912</guid>
		<description>Strange, my posts aren&#039;t posting...and then there&#039;s one that pastes two posts together...wth?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strange, my posts aren&#8217;t posting&#8230;and then there&#8217;s one that pastes two posts together&#8230;wth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hicsuget</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/18/great-news-amazon-remotely-deleting-books-downloaded-to-users-kindles/comment-page-3/#comment-2445910</link>
		<dc:creator>hicsuget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=59275#comment-2445910</guid>
		<description>The smarter thing to have done would have been to have paid the company that &lt;em&gt;does&lt;/em&gt; own the rights whatever royalties fees they were going to pay to the company that uploaded the books without permission—&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compulsory_license&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;compulsory licensing&lt;/a&gt; is not unknown in US copyright law. If additional damages were to be sought beyond this royalty payment, the copyright holder could extract them from the infringer, not from Amazon or its users, who acted in good faith.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The smarter thing to have done would have been to have paid the company that <em>does</em> own the rights whatever royalties fees they were going to pay to the company that uploaded the books without permission—<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compulsory_license" rel="nofollow">compulsory licensing</a> is not unknown in US copyright law. If additional damages were to be sought beyond this royalty payment, the copyright holder could extract them from the infringer, not from Amazon or its users, who acted in good faith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
