Wild horses couldn’t keep Democrats from spending money

posted at 10:11 am on July 17, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

With deficits rising out of sight and more Americans out of work than any time in the last several decades, one might think that Congress would take a sober and skeptical look at any unnecessary spending.  Okay, okay, you got me — I didn’t write that with a straight face.  But even I was surprised to find Democrats pushing to spend almost a billion dollars on a program to provide a new welfare program to …. horses?

Yup (via Power Line):

[Today], House Democrats plan to hold a vote on the “Restore Our American Mustangs Act” (H.R.1018), which would create a new $700 million welfare program for wild horses.  This floor action comes at a time when unemployment has soared to 9.5 percent, a 26-year high, and the federal deficit has grown to a historic $1 trillion.

“There are serious issues facing our country right now and it’s absurd that Democrat leaders believe that spending $700 million to pamper wild horses is the best use of our time and Americans’ tax dollars,” said Ranking Member Hastings. “Instead of restoring American mustangs, let’s restore American jobs and put the horsepower back into our economy.”

Here’s what HR1018 proposes to do with the $700 million:

  • Conducts a horse census every two years
  • Provides “enhanced contraception” and birth control for horses
  • Establishes an additional 19 million acres of public and private land  for wild horses
  • Covers $5 million tab to repair horse damage to land
  • Mandates that government bureaucrats perform home inspections before Americans can adopt horses

Birth control … for horses.  How exactly does that restore the mustang population?  If it needs “restoring”, doesn’t that suggest that we need to encourage reproduction rather than launching a mustang safe-sex program?  Of course, mustang rubbers would make each successive “horse census” easier, assuming mustangs can figure out how to wear them.

And what exactly does a government inspection of a home for “adopting” a mustang mean?  It sounds like a back-door way for the federal government to interfere with horse sales, or at best a wildly stupid idea about the role of the federal government in relation to American homes and pet adoption.  Note that the federal government does not do home inspections for human adoption; those get handled by state governments.

Of course, it’s the third point that really means anything at all.  It’s a land grab.  Congress wants to condemn another 19 million acres of land for their own control, and they’re using the mustangs as an excuse.  It’s transparent, and transparently stupid in the middle of this economic crisis.  Democrats need to quit laying money on the horses — and while they’re at it, quit betting with House money on socialist schemes.

Update: For those who think that the government has become a joke … well, you may be right.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

I’m going to start saving money for when we do go broke and the government has to start selling off federal land at bargain prices.

BadgerHawk on July 17, 2009 at 10:14 AM

Appropriate picture – we are looking directly at Pelosi’s face.

Vashta.Nerada on July 17, 2009 at 10:14 AM

Wild horses couldn’t keep Democrats from spending money

Shouldn’t this read: Even Wild Horses Can Keep Democrats Spending Money.

ChrisB on July 17, 2009 at 10:14 AM

Sounds like something California’s legislature would do. Which means bankruptcy is right around the corner.

Doughboy on July 17, 2009 at 10:14 AM

Love Mustangs (horses and cars) but this is just effin stupid.

Democrats – never miss an opportunity to spend money.

Thunderstorm129 on July 17, 2009 at 10:14 AM

Wild horses couldn’t keep Democrats from spending money

Shouldn’t this read: Even Wild Horses Can Keep Democrats Spending Money.

ChrisB on July 17, 2009 at 10:14 AM

I think the title is in spirit of the Rolling Stones’ song, Wild Horses.

Thunderstorm129 on July 17, 2009 at 10:15 AM

These idiots are drunk with power and delusion.

They (representatives and senators) will be the first against the wall when the revolution comes.

wildcat84 on July 17, 2009 at 10:15 AM

mustang rubbers

At least it’ll create jobs for the out of work college frat boy grads who get to put the rubbers on.

BadgerHawk on July 17, 2009 at 10:16 AM

Appropriate picture – we are looking directly at Pelosi’s face.

Vashta.Nerada on July 17, 2009 at 10:14 AM

really? i saw barabra boxer.

Ghoul aid on July 17, 2009 at 10:18 AM

Appropriate picture – we are looking directly at Pelosi’s face.

Vashta.Nerada on July 17, 2009 at 10:14 AM

Actually, there are any number of people in this administration who could fit that image, including Mr. President!

scalleywag on July 17, 2009 at 10:18 AM

Horse census and birth control. Another sop to Acorn and Planned Parenthood. Congress doesn’t have the horse-sense God gave a jacka$$.

ICBM on July 17, 2009 at 10:18 AM

At least it’ll create jobs for the out of work college frat boy grads who get to put the rubbers on.

BadgerHawk on July 17, 2009 at 10:16 AM

Yes but as we know about other “rubber” programs that Obama and Congress put in place, the mustang “rubbers” will be made in China.

MobileVideoEngineer on July 17, 2009 at 10:19 AM

ICBM on July 17, 2009 at 10:18 AM

Actually, I would pay big money to watch a ACORN member with a clipboard approach a wild mustang.

We’re gonna need another volunteer.

HoustonRight on July 17, 2009 at 10:19 AM

Crazy jackasses spending on behalf of wild mustangs. Universal veterinary care is here. Rich racehorse breeders to foot the bill for hapless nags.

Fletch54 on July 17, 2009 at 10:20 AM

I love horses but in reality these mustangs are feral animals, no different than feral dogs and cats. They aren’t native to the American west, they are the offspring of imported stock. What next? Feral Mutt Forest? Feral Cat Federal Scratching Posts? If folks want to save the horses then start a foundation and leave the taxpayers out of it.

Limerick on July 17, 2009 at 10:20 AM

I think the title is in spirit of the Rolling Stones’ song, Wild Horses.

Thunderstorm129 on July 17, 2009 at 10:15 AM

Before my time, alas. Maybe also something like the U2 song Who’s Gonna Ride Your Wild Horses

ChrisB on July 17, 2009 at 10:20 AM

As my grandfather noted in my younger days as yet another pro-union Democrat took the reins of power in our state capital,

“Why are there so many more horses asses than there are horses?”

50 years after I first heard him say this, I can say, easily, it is as appropriate today as it ever was.

coldwarrior on July 17, 2009 at 10:20 AM

Loan me $2 million of that and I’ll start a business, employ 50 people and replay the loan in 2-4 years.

oddjob1138 on July 17, 2009 at 10:22 AM

Of course, it’s the third point that really means anything at all. It’s a land grab. Congress wants to condemn another 19 million acres of land for their own control, and they’re using the mustangs as an excuse

Doing is the under the guise of horse birth-control would make this bill a Trojan Horse.

ICBM on July 17, 2009 at 10:22 AM

At least it’ll create jobs for the out of work college frat boy grads who get to put the rubbers on.

BadgerHawk on July 17, 2009 at 10:16 AM
Yes but as we know about other “rubber” programs that Obama and Congress put in place, the mustang “rubbers” will be made in China.

MobileVideoEngineer on July 17, 2009 at 10:19 AM

Heh.

ladyingray on July 17, 2009 at 10:23 AM

Are unicorns included?

Jeff from WI on July 17, 2009 at 10:24 AM

“Why are there so many more horses asses than there are horses?”

50 years after I first heard him say this, I can say, easily, it is as appropriate today as it ever was.

coldwarrior on July 17, 2009 at 10:20 AM

In honor of your grandfather, I am sooo gonna borrow that…

ladyingray on July 17, 2009 at 10:24 AM

This is just a land grab. Horses are not as native American species and liberals could care less if they survive, which is why there is birth control as part of the program. Using the horses as the excuse is just a way to get western pols on board with the land grab. The money for land repair is there for the same purpose.

Rocks on July 17, 2009 at 10:24 AM

So they want to take cattle off federal land and let mustangs run free? Liberals are really screwed up. They are really funny, don’t they think people out west know how to take care of horses? Now you have federal government telling people how to raise horses. Maybe they think people in New York City will adopt these mustangs and they have to see if a proper home is provided. This is too much, is there nothing the government thinks it cannot control?

Ed Laskie on July 17, 2009 at 10:25 AM

How does “enhanced contraception” differ from “regular-old-fashioned” contraception? Just wondering.

vcferlita on July 17, 2009 at 10:26 AM

when is the uprising going to occur? at the rate we are going, by summers end, we will have Amnesty, Nationalized Heath Care and Cap and Tax for a phony Global Warming….

That should just about kill our country just in time fro the brain dead American idol MTV generation to wake up going “whaaaat?”

SDarchitect on July 17, 2009 at 10:26 AM

This poor sick Republic is drowning and the moronic fools that run it have tied rocks to our waists. Never would one have believed that this could have happened . . . but it did and it is.

rplat on July 17, 2009 at 10:27 AM

How does “enhanced contraception” differ from “regular-old-fashioned” contraception? Just wondering.

vcferlita on July 17, 2009 at 10:26 AM

“Enhanced” features women in Tijuana

ChrisB on July 17, 2009 at 10:28 AM

Unreal

blatantblue on July 17, 2009 at 10:28 AM

rplat on July 17, 2009 at 10:27 AM

Franklin did. The purse is open and everyone has GPS directions to it.

Limerick on July 17, 2009 at 10:28 AM

vcferlita on July 17, 2009 at 10:26 AM

Because just say “neigh” didn’t work out so well? :-)

coldwarrior on July 17, 2009 at 10:28 AM

Doing is the under the guise of horse birth-control would make this bill a Trojan Horse.

ICBM on July 17, 2009 at 10:22 AM

Well done.

myrenovations on July 17, 2009 at 10:28 AM

La la la la la ah-harrrrrrmed re-heeeeevolution da dee dee da da da….

MadisonConservative on July 17, 2009 at 10:29 AM

Are unicorns included?

Jeff from WI on July 17, 2009 at 10:24 AM

Exactly, how else are they going to get their unicorn quota? They need horses to glue the horns on!

Enoxo on July 17, 2009 at 10:29 AM

Why don’t critics of these POS pieces of legislation highlight the sponsors?

Why make it so hard to identify who to ridicule?

Isn’t there a more specific description than “House Democrats”? I thought someone had to be identified as a primary sponsor. Maybe I’m wrong.

Maybe it won’t make a difference, but I think it would help if these members of Congress and Senators were required to be identified with specific legislation–and then let the ridicule commence.

BuckeyeSam on July 17, 2009 at 10:29 AM

What next? Feral Mutt Forest? Feral Cat Federal Scratching Posts? If folks want to save the horses then start a foundation and leave the taxpayers out of it.

Limerick on July 17, 2009 at 10:20 AM

Quiet, Limerick. Don’t give them any ideas.

The real drawback to this program is that wild stallions almost always refuse to wear condoms. IF they knock up a mare, they just move on to the next one. Not even paying colt support.

rbj on July 17, 2009 at 10:30 AM

Doing is the under the guise of horse birth-control would make this bill a Trojan Horse.

ICBM on July 17, 2009 at 10:22 AM

LOL!
+5

Laura in Maryland on July 17, 2009 at 10:30 AM

Regarding the “Humor Contractor” – there is an archive of the original request that you have to read to believe, but it is now updated to say that this contractor request is no longer required…would have liked to have heard that conversation :-)

Cliveclone17 on July 17, 2009 at 10:30 AM

This is just a land grab. Horses are not as native American species and liberals could care less if they survive, which is why there is birth control as part of the program. Using the horses as the excuse is just a way to get western pols on board with the land grab. The money for land repair is there for the same purpose.

Rocks on July 17, 2009 at 10:24 AM

I agree any time the government gives money it is for control and take over purposes. This is a land grab like you say.

Ed Laskie on July 17, 2009 at 10:30 AM

Well, part of the issue with the mustangs is if they overbreed/overpopulate their range, they damage the area more and they become less healthy. Hence the capturing and “adoption” of mustangs pretty cheaply. I can see the value of a contraception program.

But, the land grab? And expanding this budget item during the worst recession “since the Great Depression?” Not a wise policy by any means.

cs89 on July 17, 2009 at 10:30 AM

Liberals could have their hands cuf off and still find a way to reach into “their” pockets to give to someone else. I lose faith in this government every day, I don’t know how much more of this I can take.

roopster217 on July 17, 2009 at 10:31 AM

Restore our American Mustangs Act

What’s all this I’ve been hearing about restoring Mustangs. Hasn’t the government poke its nose into the car companies enough already!

normschaef on July 17, 2009 at 10:31 AM

Which leftist enviro-wacko campaign donors are they paying off with this absurd bill?

PattyJ on July 17, 2009 at 10:32 AM

Sponsor
Rep. Nick Rahall [D, WV-3]
and 7 Co-Sponsors
Rep. Madeleine Bordallo [D, GU-0]
Rep. Sam Farr [D, CA-17]
Rep. Raul Grijalva [D, AZ-7]
Rep. Dennis Kucinich [D, OH-10]
Rep. Carolyn Maloney [D, NY-14]
Rep. George Miller [D, CA-7]
Rep. Henry Waxman [D, CA-30]
close
Committees
House Natural Resources
1 more
House Natural Resources
close
Amendments
This bill has no amendments.
Amendments to H.R.1018Number Status Purpose

Key West Reader on July 17, 2009 at 10:32 AM

It is Lebensraum for Nelly.

Limerick on July 17, 2009 at 10:32 AM

passing out condoms to horses as a means to ‘restore wild mustangs’? Yeah – most definately will add to their wild side for sure.

gatorboy on July 17, 2009 at 10:33 AM

Dems spending our money…one-trick pony Congress.

coldwarrior on July 17, 2009 at 10:33 AM

Sponsor of Bill HR1018: Rep. Nick Rahall [D-WV3]

Organizations supporting Bill1018:

Manes and Tails Organization
The Cloud Foundation
Humane Society of the United States
American Horse Defense Fund

Yoop on July 17, 2009 at 10:33 AM

Regardless of his debacles, Obama will remain somewhat popular, but the folks in Congress will get crucified back home. Barry doesn’t give a sh*t, as long as he can get his big cornerstone Healthcare passed. He couldn’t care less about the bloodbath that his useful idiots in the House and Senate will endure.

marklmail on July 17, 2009 at 10:34 AM

What’s all this I’ve been hearing about restoring Mustangs. Hasn’t the government poke its nose into the car companies enough already!

normschaef on July 17, 2009 at 10:31 AM

Let us hope for the sake of the poor mustangs that they fare better under government control than many GM and Chrysler dealerships.

ChrisB on July 17, 2009 at 10:34 AM

Rep. Madeleine Bordallo [D, GU-0]

Bordallo? Bordello? Mustangs? Mustang Ranch?

No wonder they got co-sponsors.

coldwarrior on July 17, 2009 at 10:35 AM

It is Lebensraum for Nelly.

Limerick on July 17, 2009 at 10:32 AM

heh….. rimshot

tru2tx on July 17, 2009 at 10:36 AM


Sponsor
Rep. Nick Rahall [D, WV-3]
and 7 Co-Sponsors
Rep. Madeleine Bordallo [D, GU-0]
Rep. Sam Farr [D, CA-17]
Rep. Raul Grijalva [D, AZ-7]
Rep. Dennis Kucinich [D, OH-10]
Rep. Carolyn Maloney [D, NY-14]
Rep. George Miller [D, CA-7]
Rep. Henry Waxman [D, CA-30]
close
Committees
House Natural Resources
1 more
House Natural Resources
close
Amendments
This bill has no amendments.
Amendments to H.R.1018Number Status Purpose

Curious thing here. The bulk of the wild mustang population is up in North and South Dakota. Yet not one representative from either state is listed as a sponsor here.

Why is that?

pilamaye on July 17, 2009 at 10:36 AM

Manes and Tails Organization
The Cloud Foundation
Humane Society of the United States
American Horse Defense Fund

Yoop on July 17, 2009 at 10:33 AM

Private outfits, relying on the public dime….seems they could be a lot better job of getting private concerned citizens to help out if they hadn’t decided to become adjuncts to the Dem party.

coldwarrior on July 17, 2009 at 10:36 AM

Once again, the government wants to throw money at another government agency that has failed in doing what it’s suppose to do, protect the wild horses of America. The Bureau of Land Management is already tasked with this job and it is they who have yearly “adopt a mustang” programs and ALREADY do census counts on how many horses populate our country. Their website talks about the problem of population control and how they have to remove horses and relocate them. Because activists stand in their way in the name of letting the wild horses be “wild”, the one sure way to control population growth is not used…gelding the stallions (same as neutering your dog). It’s a simple procedure (I’ve owned horses) that could be done during yearly round-ups. They have no natural predators (hmm, wonder why) so gelding the males is a sure way to control population growth and in no way would cost $700 mil to carry out.

Wileygrl3 on July 17, 2009 at 10:38 AM

Whoa Nelly!

this is about as asinine as it gets…you think you’ve seen it all….

cmsinaz on July 17, 2009 at 10:38 AM

As Andrew Sullivan would say, mustangs like to go bareback.

I like wild horses, but rather than just shooting them when they get too populated in a range, we will now managed them with contraception drugs? I am sorry, I do not want to pay for this.

I is rather seedy to round up wild horses and make them into dog food, but compared to what? Overgrazing actually kills more of them in the long run. If the dog food or Japanese/French horse meat trade does not tickle your fancy, then what would be cheap and humane is to occasionally shoot some of them (don’t coyotes and buzzards have to eat too?).

Mr. Joe on July 17, 2009 at 10:38 AM

This is just a land grab. Horses are not as native American species and liberals could care less if they survive, which is why there is birth control as part of the program. Using the horses as the excuse is just a way to get western pols on board with the land grab. The money for land repair is there for the same purpose.

Rocks on July 17, 2009 at 10:24 AM

Partly, but I suspect it is also intended to prevent them going to slaughter houses in large numbers. That’s the purpose of the home inspection for owner qualification,..to see if adoption is a strawman for slaughter purposes.

a capella on July 17, 2009 at 10:39 AM

More issues from the bill:

Revokes provisions that allow the Secretaries to destroy: (1) old, sick, or lame animals; (2) excess horses and burros for which an adoption demand does not exist.

Requires adopters of such horses and burros to affirm that adopted animals and their remains will not be used for commercial purposes. Prohibits containing such horses and burros in corrals or short-term holding facilities for more than six months while awaiting disposition. Prohibits the destruction of such horses or burros unless the Secretaries: (1) determine that the horses or burros are terminally ill or fatally injured; and (2) ensure that the terminally ill or fatally injured horse or burro will be destroyed in the most humane manner.

So, no destroying a merely suffuring old, sick horse unless it’s “terminally ill or fatally injured,” and then only in “the most humane manner” (regardless of cost, apparently).

(Sec. 6) Requires owners of private land to return such horses or burros that have wandered onto their land to public lands.

So, if you own land near wild horses/burros, and they wander onto your property, it’s your responsibility and cost to get them back onto public property.

Looks like land grab + sop to environmentalist groups + expanding govt. authority/$.

Great.

cs89 on July 17, 2009 at 10:40 AM

(don’t coyotes and buzzards have to eat too?).

Mr. Joe on July 17, 2009 at 10:38 AM

Josey Wales said they did…

ladyingray on July 17, 2009 at 10:41 AM

House Democrats plan to hold a vote on the “Restore Our American Mustangs Act”

Count me in. I always had a passion for the ’67 Shelby GT.

fogw on July 17, 2009 at 10:42 AM

The trolls are so quiet on such threads

Disgusting

CWforFreedom on July 17, 2009 at 10:44 AM

This will provide lots of good paying u union jobs to tighten the nuts on Mustangs.

It’s part of the stimulus program, and an effective contraception program. And Ed makes it sound like the Democrats are being wasteful when it’s really a two-fer!

/s

Right_of_Attila on July 17, 2009 at 10:44 AM

If I were unstable, a commie pig, hated my country, godless, a firm disciple of uptopian ideology and had a overwhleming desire to cause pain, destruction and death to the majority of humanity, I would run for political office as a Democrat, cheat, lie and steal to get my party into a position of absolute power and could spend billions of dollars with no discipline… I would do this…

katy on July 17, 2009 at 10:45 AM

Look at the price tag again: $700,000,000.00

Key West Reader on July 17, 2009 at 10:46 AM

Count me in. I always had a passion for the ‘67 Shelby GT.

fogw on July 17, 2009 at 10:42 AM

Can I get a California Special?

thomasaur on July 17, 2009 at 10:47 AM

Key West Reader on July 17, 2009 at 10:32 AM

Yoop on July 17, 2009 at 10:33 AM

pilamaye on July 17, 2009 at 10:36 AM

Thanks. That’s helpful.

My point is that more needs to be done by critics to specifically identify sponsors and then determine WTF they are proposing this kind of sh*t. Ridicule isn’t as strong a weapon as it used to be, but it’s still pretty effective.

BuckeyeSam on July 17, 2009 at 10:47 AM

People in the west adopt these horses and burros all the time. You are required to have adequate space, fencing, income to provide for the animals and no convictions for animal neglect or cruelty. But apparently, that’s not enough. Now you have to have a social worker, too.

mchristian on July 17, 2009 at 10:47 AM

The trolls are so quiet on such threads

Disgusting

CWforFreedom on July 17, 2009 at 10:44 AM

They’re busy surfing the Web to find stories about the horrors of non-operational hit squads that were contemplated for AQ leaders.

Priorities.

BuckeyeSam on July 17, 2009 at 10:49 AM

Here’s your funny Friday video…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UrwdZ2bX-oc&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fgatewaypundit.blogspot.com%2F&feature=player_embedded

Hopefully it’s a peek into our ‘fictional’ future.

CPT. Charles on July 17, 2009 at 10:49 AM

O.k… I know that this is off topic, but this seems to be the active thread.

I just heard the stand-in host on the Neil Bortz (sp?) show say that his inside source in D.C. said that three different committees spent most of the night passing the Health Care Takeover bill (and that it’s now up to 1040 pages). Do y’all have any confirmation on this?

Theophile on July 17, 2009 at 10:51 AM

Isn’t this T Boone Pickens’ wife’s big charity? Maybe its a “Hey–sorry about the wind thing, but here’s a billion for the horses.”

http://www.parade.com/news/intelligence-report/archive/090719-protecting-wild-mustangs.html

KDB on July 17, 2009 at 10:51 AM

Somehow, the characters in “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest” seem pretty normal, to me!

Star20 on July 17, 2009 at 10:51 AM

Well, I’ve seen money spent on worse projects. It’s never going to stop, so I’m resigned to it unless blue states are split off from reds and we regain some semblance of fiscal sanity.

a capella on July 17, 2009 at 10:51 AM

Look at the price tag again: $700,000,000.00

Key West Reader on July 17, 2009 at 10:46 AM

Yes, keep in mind, that is almost 10% of the stimulus… I mean stabilization bill. What exactly kept them from just putting this in the stim… oops stabilization bill? I mean there was already so much stupid crap in the sti… stabilization bill that this little thing wouldn’t have killed it. Then again, at the time of it’s passing, it was the stimulus and this bill is meant to stabilize not stimulate the wild horses (they are stimulated enough and that’s why they need rubbers).

MobileVideoEngineer on July 17, 2009 at 10:51 AM

Can I get a California Special?

thomasaur on July 17, 2009 at 10:47 AM

That’s primo dude. Comes with Pelosi embedded in the grill.

fogw on July 17, 2009 at 10:52 AM

Ha, maybe they should just include horses in the Health Care bill.

What buffoons.

ORconservative on July 17, 2009 at 10:52 AM

I find it interesting that the environmentalist are not demanding that the Horses be eliminated. They are actually a foreign, invasive and destructive species not native to the land they inhabit.

Brian The Adequate on July 17, 2009 at 10:53 AM

Wild Horses – a new voting block for democrats? No doubt they’ll “buck up” for Obama and vote “Nay” to any fiscal responsibility. Hay, sorry for the puns.

jbtripp on July 17, 2009 at 10:53 AM

Our founding fathers were horribly wrong when they counted blacks as three-fifths of a man.

Instead, the Constitution should read that if you are a Democrat, your vote counts for only three-fifths of a vote. How do these nitwits get into office?

BuckeyeSam on July 17, 2009 at 10:54 AM

Oh, to make an on-topic comment, we are having a horse adoption this weekend here in Lubbock, Texas where I live. It’s going on all weekend. If you adopt an older horse you get $500 in order to help pay for it’s initial feeding.

Theophile on July 17, 2009 at 10:54 AM

pilamaye on July 17, 2009 at 10:36 AM

This idea sounded bad to me at first, but if Dennis Kucinich is on board, so am I. He’s full of good sense.

/sarc

jazz_piano on July 17, 2009 at 10:55 AM

That’s primo dude. Comes with Pelosi embedded in the grill.

fogw on July 17, 2009 at 10:52 AM

Maybe just some of her skin flaps on the under-carriage.

thomasaur on July 17, 2009 at 10:55 AM

You know, considering all of the larger amounts of money that Congress is spending in far more stupid fashion, I could just about support this one. If you’re going to blow our money, spend it on horses. I like horses, at least.

Jazz Shaw on July 17, 2009 at 10:55 AM

Horses are beautiful animals. That being said I wonder how much the government would make if they had open season for wild ones?

Hunting licenses, tags, equipment, etc…

Just a thought.

And do the do-gooders who got all the horse slaughter houses closed down in the US realize that they opened up the market in Mexico? That’s right. Horses that would have been humanely slaughtered here get sent to horse hell in Mexico. They think a bolt through the head and instant death is awful. Well guess what? They don’t off horses like that in Mexico. Think more along the lines of vivisection or some Islamic beheading video.

BowHuntingTexas on July 17, 2009 at 10:55 AM

Ed, here is the link for what they Adopting means:

http://www.blm.gov/wo/st/en/prog/wild_horse_and_burro/adoption_of_wild_horses/how_to_adopt.html

Basically, qualified horse people can adopt a wild horse, take it back with them, break it and ride it.

clover_dave on July 17, 2009 at 10:55 AM

What’s with the $5 million repair of the land caused by the horses? Are they going to re-sod? What is with these people and “lawns”?

Cindy Munford on July 17, 2009 at 10:55 AM

Do y’all have any confirmation on this?
Theophile on July 17, 2009 at 10:51 AM

Yes. The sticking point was demorat insistence that “free” care for sick or injured horses, burros, iguanas, parakeets and earthworms would be included in the healthcare bill, and that a new $20 billion dollar hospital facility for the treatment of affectation teacup poodles be built in Hollywood.

It all passed, finally. Welcome to the Motherland, comrade.

Bishop on July 17, 2009 at 10:57 AM

Ugh. I’m a horse lover, but this is stupid. We don’t have the money for the programs already in place. We can’t be committing more money to new programs, regardless of how worthy, until we get out budget in the black. And this isn’t worthy of our tax dollars. Wildlife management doesn’t have to cost millions of dollars, people will pay to do it, if you just do what we do for most wildlife species in MO, and many other states, provide the opportunity to hunt them, depending upon populations. With horses it’s easier. There are people that will pay for a permit to round up wild horses to raise, train, and or sell. What is wrong with that?

aelhues on July 17, 2009 at 10:57 AM

pilamaye on July 17, 2009 at 10:36 AM

Ya bet me to it. I spotted the same anomaly. There are wild horses through the west, yet there is only one co-sponsor from a truly western state (AZ)
No folks, California is not a western state.It’s just the most eastern of the north eastern of our states.

oldernwiser on July 17, 2009 at 10:57 AM

What’s with the $5 million repair of the land caused by the horses? Are they going to re-sod? What is with these people and “lawns”?

Cindy Munford on July 17, 2009 at 10:55 AM

They like grass, if you know what I mean.

jazz_piano on July 17, 2009 at 10:58 AM

If I loose my job I can always play a Pantomime horse.

shick on July 17, 2009 at 11:01 AM

I don’t think gay people should be able to adopt horses.

MadisonConservative on July 17, 2009 at 11:01 AM

I find it interesting that the environmentalist are not demanding that the Horses be eliminated. They are actually a foreign, invasive and destructive species not native to the land they inhabit.

Brian The Adequate on July 17, 2009 at 10:53 AM

But they are at least consistent. In Arizona you need to get a permit to clear mesquite from your pasture land. Mesquite is not native to the area. it’s all over the damn place,but it’s not native.

oldernwiser on July 17, 2009 at 11:02 AM

Sounds like typical liberal insanity to me, but I’m not surprised.

GFW on July 17, 2009 at 11:06 AM

This is just a land grab. Horses are not as native American species and liberals could care less if they survive, which is why there is birth control as part of the program. Using the horses as the excuse is just a way to get western pols on board with the land grab. The money for land repair is there for the same purpose.

Rocks on July 17, 2009 at 10:24 AM
I agree any time the government gives money it is for control and take over purposes. This is a land grab like you say.

Ed Laskie on July 17, 2009

Teddy Roosevelt must be laughing in hell.

SKYFOX on July 17, 2009 at 11:07 AM

Horse Trojans to prevent wild stallions from horsing around on 19 million acres (about 300,000 square miles!), and if that doesn’t take away our Colts, the gun-grabbers will.

They want horse contraception to promote wild horses, and want to set aside land for horses, then spend money to repair horse damage? Why do they insist on funding both sides of issues in conflict with each other?

You’ve got to give them credit for one thing. By mandating inspections for Americans wanting to adopt horses, they’re giving bureaucrats “stable” employment.

Steve Z on July 17, 2009 at 11:07 AM

The only thing might even considered is the “horse cencus” every two years, contracepcion??? Hello, I thought the wild horses on the range were too many, that no matter how many people adopted, we were going to have to sell them to a french fast-food chain.

Inspections???? Yeah, right that would get more potential owners.

Ed, no, it does not mean that they will look into DOMESTIC animals being adopted, it all has to be concerned with this:

http://www.blm.gov/wo/st/en/prog/wild_horse_and_burro/adoption_of_wild_horses/how_to_adopt.html

clover_dave on July 17, 2009 at 11:07 AM

The trolls are so quiet on such threads

Disgusting

CWforFreedom on July 17, 2009 at 10:44 AM

They have been stunned into silence by the contemplation of stallion-sized prophylactics.

Yoop on July 17, 2009 at 11:07 AM

Comment pages: 1 2