Gallup poll of Republicans: Romney 26, Palin 21, Huckabee 19

posted at 4:30 pm on July 16, 2009 by Allahpundit

Within the margin of error, as these early polls of Republican frontrunners always are. Interestingly, while Sarahcuda’s favorable rating among Republicans remains dramatically higher than either Mitt’s or Huck’s (partly due to the fact that she’s much better known), she can’t put any daylight between herself and them as a choice for the nomination. And then there’s this:

On the plus side, she hasn’t really lost — or gained — any ground with Americans since last fall. On the minus side, you can imagine the Huckabee attack ad already: She’s unelectable.

Question: If both Romney and Palin announce that they’re running, does Huck drop out and play kingmaker instead? He’d have an outside shot to win a head-to-head race with Romney on the strength of the “anyone but Mitt” vote from evangelicals and “true conservatives.” He’d have an outside shot to win a head-to-head race with Palin on the strength of the “anyone but Sarah” vote from centrists. But what shot does he have to win a three-way race when the “anyone but Mitts” will probably break for Palin and the “anyone but Sarahs” will probably break for Romney? The smart move, I’d think, would be to stay out and sell his endorsement to one of the other two candidates, possibly in exchange for the VP slot. He can do more for Mitt than he can for Palin by giving him the Christian seal of approval, but maybe that prospect is reason enough for the ‘Cuda to recruit him and keep him on her side. Could he suppress his disdain for Romney even in return for a spot on the ticket, though? And could Mitt tolerate the idea of working with him for four years in return for winning the nomination? Magic eightball says: Unlikely.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4

Rush is Right.

OneVision on July 16, 2009 at 5:30 PM

ddrintn on July 16, 2009 at 5:22 PM

Romney started early on that. http://www.radioiowa.com/gestalt/go.cfm?objectid=DE7F01D9-AFCD-0FF1-A5681A3CD489087C

thecountofincognito on July 16, 2009 at 5:28 PM

I can’t click on the link right now, but I notice it says “radioiowa”. Now, I’m not in Iowa.

Pretty soon, Romney might start to get the appearance of someone who wants it just a little too much. It’s off-putting.

ddrintn on July 16, 2009 at 5:31 PM

I wonder how many detractors of Palin in Alaska said the same thing about her when she was running for governor.

“Oh … it’s a different game in the Capitol. The Statehouse is different … it not a small town. Being mayor is completely different than governor. She’ll never be able to hack it there.”

Yada, yada, yada.

darwin on July 16, 2009 at 5:32 PM

missing the point yet again allah

jonnyshocko on July 16, 2009 at 5:34 PM

ROFL…unlike the eminently imminently electable Huckabee?

ddrintn on July 16, 2009 at 5:29 PM

Sonia Sotomayor asked me to fix it for you. ;)

yogi41 on July 16, 2009 at 5:35 PM

E L Frederick (Sniper One) on July 16, 2009 at 5:14 PM

The fact that Obama has expanded the WoT and the Democrats recently funded a “premanent standing nation-building office” should be a clue that Bush turned out to be as liberal in his foreign policy as he was in his domestic policy.

Does foreign policy blowback still not exist in the Bush “conservatives’” world? Really?

Rae on July 16, 2009 at 5:37 PM

Romney/Pence!!!

lavell12 on July 16, 2009 at 5:37 PM

If Rush can like Romney, I can like Romney.

iamse7en on July 16, 2009 at 5:38 PM

He’d have an outside shot to win a head-to-head race with Romney on the strength of the “anyone but Mitt” vote from evangelicals and “true conservatives.”

Hey, I’M an Evangelical and true Conservative, and I’m for Romney!

nickj116 on July 16, 2009 at 5:44 PM

Romney/Pence!!!

lavell12 on July 16, 2009 at 5:37 PM

Or Romney/Thune!

http://nicholasjacob.wordpress.com/2009/07/05/romneythune-2012/

nickj116 on July 16, 2009 at 5:45 PM

nickj116 on July 16, 2009 at 5:44 PM

No, You worship the devil.

TimeTraveler on July 16, 2009 at 5:47 PM

Hey, I’M an Evangelical and true Conservative, and I’m for Romney!

nickj116 on July 16, 2009 at 5:44 PM

Hey! Don’t you know Romney is Mormon? /sarc

darwin on July 16, 2009 at 5:47 PM

If Rush can like Romney, I can like Romney.

iamse7en on July 16, 2009 at 5:38 PM

Funny how the Mittards are refering to Rush’s last minute attempt to stop McCain from getting the nomination as an “endorsement” of Romney for 2012.

Anyone who listens to Rush nowadays know that he is far more supportive of Palin than anyone else in the GOP.

Norwegian on July 16, 2009 at 5:47 PM

Romney/Pence!!!

lavell12 on July 16, 2009 at 5:37 PM

No way. I’d say Romney-Pawlenty. I don’t want to hear any more complaints after the blowout blaming knuckle-draggers in the party.

ddrintn on July 16, 2009 at 5:48 PM

No way. I’d say Romney-Pawlenty. I don’t want to hear any more complaints after the blowout blaming knuckle-draggers in the party.

ddrintn on July 16, 2009 at 5:48 PM

Or what about Romney-Powell? 99.99% of all conservatives would sit home on election day.

Norwegian on July 16, 2009 at 5:50 PM

Hey, I’M an Evangelical and true Conservative, and I’m for Romney!

nickj116 on July 16, 2009 at 5:44 PM

+1

I’m not his biggest fan by any means, but I did vote for him in the primaries.

thevastlane on July 16, 2009 at 5:51 PM

He’d have an outside shot to win a head-to-head race with Palin on the strength of the “anyone but Sarah” vote from centrists.

Any “centrist” who dislikes Palin probably dislikes Huckabee even more. I know I do.

Infidoll on July 16, 2009 at 5:54 PM

Mittards

Ugh. It is gonna be a long three years :(

terryannonline on July 16, 2009 at 5:55 PM

How any conservative could support Mitt “MittCare” Romney is beyond me.

Agree. I voted Romney in the primaries but as time has gone by his health reform in Massachusetts has proven why he got “bipartisan” support; it’s a financial boondoggle similar to Obamacare. It explains why he’s so tepid on criticizing the destruction of American healthcare; he agrees with most of Obama’s platform. The private insurance gimmick is a cheap ploy. Obviously when you’re paying the private carriers 64 cents on a dollar of cost you’re planning to kill them off as sure as Pelosi or Hoyer.

I wouldn’t make the same mistake and vote for Romney again.

rcl on July 16, 2009 at 5:57 PM

Funny how the Mittards are refering to Rush’s last minute attempt to stop McCain from getting the nomination as an “endorsement” of Romney for 2012.

Anyone who listens to Rush nowadays know that he is far more supportive of Palin than anyone else in the GOP.

Norwegian on July 16, 2009 at 5:47 PM

As the linked piece states, Rush was not the only one to endorse Mitt Romney. Levin, Hannity, and Ingraham were also on his side.

I listen to Rush nowadays, read his website, and discern absolutely no comparative analysis by Rush whatsoever of Palin vs. Romney.

You can insult Romney supporters like me as “Mittards” all you want. The more you do so, the more you resemble Bill Maher, who engaged in similar name-calling by labeling Romney himself as a “bimbo.” If you want to be buddies with Maher, be my guest.

OneVision on July 16, 2009 at 5:59 PM

Rush is Right.

OneVision on July 16, 2009 at 5:30 PM

Continue to live in 2008 if you want. I prefer to live in the NOW.

portlandon on July 16, 2009 at 6:00 PM

Told ya, AP is Mittboy.Even though he is a border line socialist but he talks smoothly I suppose. That’s want the chief diva here wants.

But finally glad that Mitt supporters are outing themselves as “centrists” and stop the parade of “conservatism.”

promachus on July 16, 2009 at 6:02 PM

OneVision on July 16, 2009 at 5:59 PM

No one is attacking mitt supporters…. It’s the mitt supporters who are attacking sarah!

TimeTraveler on July 16, 2009 at 6:03 PM

Rush is Right.

OneVision on July 16, 2009 at 5:30 PM

Rush gave us the Bush disaster. Rush is not right.

True_King on July 16, 2009 at 6:04 PM

Continue to live in 2008 if you want. I prefer to live in the NOW.

portlandon on July 16, 2009 at 6:00 PM

Me too. NOW, it’s Romney 26, Palin 21, Huckabee 19.

I like now just fine.

OneVision on July 16, 2009 at 6:05 PM

No one is attacking mitt supporters…. It’s the mitt supporters who are attacking sarah!

TimeTraveler on July 16, 2009 at 6:03 PM

Don’t buy into that. I’ve seen other posts agreeing with my own view that Romney-Palin would be a good team-up.

OneVision on July 16, 2009 at 6:07 PM

Funny how the Mittards are refering to Rush’s last minute attempt to stop McCain from getting the nomination as an “endorsement” of Romney for 2012.

Anyone who listens to Rush nowadays know that he is far more supportive of Palin than anyone else in the GOP.

Totally on target. The “Rush endorsed Romney” take is so out of time and context that I consider a lie. More of the same from worn out GOP hacks who care more for their personal agenda than the good of the country. American principles of free enterprise and liberty are sound bytes but never make an appearance in their Big Government policies.

I can’t buy the Two Party strategy anymore knowing neither has the will to stand up for me and my family’s right to live free.

rcl on July 16, 2009 at 6:07 PM

OneVision on July 16, 2009 at 6:07 PM

I would vote for Mitt If Palin looks weak in the primaries.

TimeTraveler on July 16, 2009 at 6:08 PM

or doesn’t run at all for that matter.

TimeTraveler on July 16, 2009 at 6:08 PM

But crosstabs among her support shows two confounding things: 1)Palin is more popular in NE and West and not in South.
2)Palin is more popular among young, unmarried, secular voters.

It’s only in Mittards fantasy that Palin’s base is evangelical right. It isn’t and they are firmly behind Huckabee. If all three get into the race, Huck will take evangelicals, Palin will take the non-evangelical conservative vote and Mittens will go home.

Huckabee can’t eat into her base but she poach his because evangelicals will love her, so he plenty of time to grow. once people get the sense that she is in, her support will skyrocket through the roof.

Also, Mittens raised 1.4 million something through 700, while Palin raised 700,000 (discounting the ATF) through 11,000 voters. Who’s got more grassroots based support? Palin.

AP can snort as much coke he likes but Palin is invincible.

PS: Can we now stop pretending that Allah is an objective reporter? He’s a Mittguy through n through.

promachus on July 16, 2009 at 6:09 PM

As the linked piece states, Rush was not the only one to endorse Mitt Romney. Levin, Hannity, and Ingraham were also on his side.

OneVision on July 16, 2009 at 5:59 PM

You’re really grasping at straws with some revisionist history. The people you mention endorsed Romney only after the SC Primary when McCain suddenly became the near inevitable front-runner.

Like I have said many times on HotAir, I voted for Romney in the 2008 GOP primary. Why? Because McCain and Huckabee were even worse. Would I vote for Romney again? Hell NO.

Hopefully we’ll have a real conservative on the ballot in 2012.

Norwegian on July 16, 2009 at 6:10 PM

Don’t buy into that. I’ve seen other posts agreeing with my own view that Romney-Palin would be a good team-up.

OneVision on July 16, 2009 at 6:07 PM

Oh, I agree. Mittboys become all nice when you suggest Palin for VP. Its only when you say Palin should run for Prez that them become into bunch of shrieking piranhas.

promachus on July 16, 2009 at 6:12 PM

It’s looking like Romney can’t win without Palin and vice-versa if the republican nomination is between them. Together – they would win. I really feel that way. They wrap up the fiscal and conservative vote in my opinion. This is why I get so angry when it looks like Romney supporters in the beltway are trying to subvert Palin. They need to get a clue and figure out a strategy for the GOP that does NOT leave social conservatives out.

But hey, I’m just some hybrid that has spent 1/2 of my life in Massachusetts and the last 1/2 of my life (so far) in Alabama.

KickandSwimMom on July 16, 2009 at 6:15 PM

I could live with Mitt, I’d happily vote for Sarah, but I’d cut off my finger before I’d vote for Huck.

JEM on July 16, 2009 at 6:16 PM

Rush DID NOT endorse Romney!

Ortzinator on July 16, 2009 at 6:16 PM

What happens to Mitt when Huckabee wins Iowa n Palin wins NH?

promachus on July 16, 2009 at 6:16 PM

Ugh, these are our only choices? I like Palin but don’t think she has a chance in a general election. And the other two…

Romney governed as a liberal. I’m supposed to take on faith that his conversion to conservatism is genuine. Just like Obama was going to govern as a centrist.

evergreen on July 16, 2009 at 6:18 PM

Woooot! Romney 2012.

Glenn Jericho on July 16, 2009 at 4:31 PM

Moderate mania!

Sapwolf on July 16, 2009 at 6:18 PM

But crosstabs among her support shows two confounding things: 1)Palin is more popular in NE and West and not in South.
2)Palin is more popular among young, unmarried, secular voters.

It’s only in Mittards fantasy that Palin’s base is evangelical right. It isn’t and they are firmly behind Huckabee. If all three get into the race, Huck will take evangelicals, Palin will take the non-evangelical conservative vote and Mittens will go home.

Huckabee can’t eat into her base but she poach his because evangelicals will love her, so he plenty of time to grow. once people get the sense that she is in, her support will skyrocket through the roof.

Good Analysis.

Btw, Allah used to support Sanford. He has a tendency to back losers, so it comes as no surprise that he now is pumping Romney.

Norwegian on July 16, 2009 at 6:18 PM

+1 for McCotter (but not necessarily 2012)

He’s totally an “unknown” though – needs to become more visible and make a name for himself nationally.
Red Eye can only get one so far.

I’m a big Aaron Schock fan and hope will stick with politics until he’s old enough to be eligible for the position.

racecar05 on July 16, 2009 at 6:19 PM

Romney governed as a liberal. I’m supposed to take on faith that his conversion to conservatism is genuine. Just like Obama was going to govern as a centrist.

evergreen on July 16, 2009 at 6:18 PM

No. But it would be comforting to you to have a conservative like Palin on the ticket would it not?

KickandSwimMom on July 16, 2009 at 6:19 PM

I wouldn’t be so sure that Huck’s Jesus Freaks will automatically love Palin. A not insignificant minority of them think a woman shouldn’t be in a political office, especially if she has young children.

Speedwagon82 on July 16, 2009 at 6:22 PM

Norwegian on July 16, 2009 at 6:18 PM

If you read Allah’s twitter, he pretty much LOATHES Romney. I think it dates back to that “Faith in America” speech where Romney didn’t give a shout out to atheists in a speech about religion, but who knows.

thecountofincognito on July 16, 2009 at 6:25 PM

Romney strikes me as an elitist,whereas Palin hits home with more of middle America. Obama and the dems are going to over reach or already have and Palin is not afraid to call him on all this crap he is spewing.

ohiobabe on July 16, 2009 at 6:26 PM

If I were Petraeus, I would come down from the clouds, win in a landslide, and then announce a new Constitutional Convention to fix our founding document.

I’d of course sieze DC, announce martial law, and arrest all federal employees, take their property, put up gallows on the mall and have show trials with Pelosi first in line.

Then, I’d force Todd to get a divorce from Sarah and announce that I was Emperor and Sarah was the Empress.

OK, I’ve been watching DVD’s of the Roman Empire the last two weeks.

:)

Sapwolf on July 16, 2009 at 6:29 PM

You’re really grasping at straws with some revisionist history. The people you mention endorsed Romney only after the SC Primary when McCain suddenly became the near inevitable front-runner.

Like I have said many times on HotAir, I voted for Romney in the 2008 GOP primary. Why? Because McCain and Huckabee were even worse. Would I vote for Romney again? Hell NO.

Hopefully we’ll have a real conservative on the ballot in 2012.

Norwegian on July 16, 2009 at 6:10 PM

No “revisionist history” is implicit in my statement. The fact remains that Levin, Hannity, and Ingraham endorsed Romney, and no spin changes that.

Furthermore, by relegating this to “history,” as opposed to the present, you imply that none of these people will continue to endorse Mitt for 2012. Neither you nor anyone alse knows that for a fact. We’ll see whether it is “history,” but my own hunch is that they will line up behind Mitt from the get-go this time, if he decides to run in 2012.

Mitt Romney was “conservative” enough for these talk radio hosts, and he is “conservative” enough for me and for many others. He is truly conservative on the issues that really count, as Rush pointed out. Right now Mitt is one of the very few taking the fight to Obambi and his minions. He’s got what it takes, in terms of resources and intelligence, to win. Mitt could mop the floor with Obambi in any debate, and I hope Mitt runs if for no other reason than I could live to see that happen.

OneVision on July 16, 2009 at 6:29 PM

What happens to Mitt when Huckabee wins Iowa n Palin wins NH?

promachus on July 16, 2009 at 6:16 PM

Depends on how they propose to address the Flying Pig Menace.

Hollowpoint on July 16, 2009 at 6:29 PM

Seriously, if Obama continues to destroy America, Sarah will have no choice but to run as a public servant. Her supporters will really push hard to convince her that it is for the country.

Sapwolf on July 16, 2009 at 6:31 PM

Mitt is probably the best choice. Palin is an awesome activist but I believe that this point in time, Mitt is a better choice for President. I do love Palin’s enthusiasm and ability to get the word out, though.

crosspatch on July 16, 2009 at 6:32 PM

If you read Allah’s twitter, he pretty much LOATHES Romney. I think it dates back to that “Faith in America” speech where Romney didn’t give a shout out to atheists in a speech about religion, but who knows.

thecountofincognito on July 16, 2009 at 6:25 PM

OK. I stand corrected then, I don’t subscribe to his Twitter. I forgot that Allah’s atheism trumps all else.

Norwegian on July 16, 2009 at 6:36 PM

Oh, I agree. Mittboys become all nice when you suggest Palin for VP. Its only when you say Palin should run for Prez that them become into bunch of shrieking piranhas.

promachus on July 16, 2009 at 6:12 PM

I, and I am sure many others, have an open mind when it comes to Palin, Jindal, or maybe even someone else for Prez in 2012. But Mitt looks like the best contender now, IMHO.

BTW – I didn’t know that piranhas shrieked. Learn something new every day. :)

OneVision on July 16, 2009 at 6:38 PM

As you folks know there is a decided gap between Sarah Palin’s favorability numbers among her own party and/or Republicans and Republican Independents and who would vote for her as POTUS as multiple polls have suggested over the past month. Here is my take on why this is so:

1)There is a certain segment of Republicans or conservatives who firmly believe that Sarah will be politically too damaged by the MSM to be a viable candidate in 2012 even though many of them like Sarah or her policies. This is a legitimate viewpoint that I hope does not play out this way but it must be acknowledged as a concern by party members. Sarah must prove to the party over the course of the next 16 months that she can withstand or bear up to the scrutiny of a 24/7 MSM full court press. Consider the next 12 monts as the regular season and the leadup to the 2010 midterms as the playoffs. In professional sports you are measured mostly on how well you perform and execute in the playoffs. The MSM take on Sarah Palin will not matter if Sarah performs well in the 2010 midterms.

2)There are many party members who profess skepticism over Sarah’s leadership abilities or skills, especially with her being able to orchestrate huge gains for the GOP in the House and/or Senate in the 2010 midterms or perhaps take back a house, although they like Sarah personally and fully acknowledge she has potential

3)Then there are those who see Palin as a disaster for the party, who cannot envision Sarah uniting the party after she prevails in the primaries, forgetting that Reagan was as despised just as much as she is and that Reagan not only managed to unite the GOP in 1980 but also used the unity as a springboard to a landslide victory

4)Sarah is not prepared to be POTUS right now. I will concede that Sarah Palin is not ready to be POTUS right now because she has been rightly preoccupied with state matters and has not focused her attention exclusively to national issues. However, I believe this perception will gradually change over the next 2-3 years and the gap will close as Sarah uses her time in the wilderness (without a job)to get her ducks in a row and built up her national resume and credibility by writing op-ed columns, giving speeches, raising a boatload of money for the GOP, and appearing frequently on TV and radio to espouse her conservative viewpoints

5)Right or wrong Sarah is not perceived by many Republicans to be ‘an economic genius’ that Romney is presented to be. The gap reflects these folks recognize Sarah for her likeability or charisma but don’t think she has ‘the right stuff’ and is not the right person in 2012 to get the country back on track after Obama gets through destroying the American economy. Over the next 2 years Sarah has to build up her economic creds (speeches, interviews, academics and economists who back her positions)if she wants to assuage these folks of her economic competence and to convince them she is worthy

6)Some Republicans are concerned that the ‘quitting meme’ will be used by the Democrats to tear down Sarah’s credibility in the general election to create doubt in Sarah’s psychological makeup, her temperament to lead, and imply to older voters she is stereotypcially a flighty, whimsical female who doesn’t know her own mind and suggest that met with the first great challenge to her Presidency would bail out on the American people because she could not mentally stand the stress or pressure of live-and-death decisions

7)Some primary voters are concerned about Levi Johnston and wonder what future revelations about Sarah and the Palin family he may unveil down the road to damage Sarah’s personal and political reputation. The gap reflects the doubt some people have that Sarah can overcome Levi, the Bristol pregnancy and the tabloidization of the Palin family politically speaking

8)Sarah is 45 and if nominated by the GOP as its standardbearer in 2012 will be 48. Some folks who personally like Sarah (John Ziegler, Ann Coulter)simply feel that Sarah should wait till 2016, 2020 or 2024. She has plenty of time to gain the necessary gravitas to be taken as a serious candidate. Simply put they don’t feel she is ready yet

9)In the evangelical community there is something that is not spoken about openly but nevertheless is real, that there is a misogynistic streak among some members. Some evangelicals may openly like Sarah or favor her brand of conservatism but cannot bring themselves to cast a vote for Sarah because she is a WOMAN; enter Mike Huckabee to the rescue

10)And there are members of the GOP who subscribe to the notion that Romney is next in line in 2012 (eg Charles Krauthammer). Sarah will have to wait her turn regardless of her qualifications

technopeasant on July 16, 2009 at 6:41 PM

Two words that Mitt not going to win POTUS.

Gun Owners.

He supports the assault ban and maintain it in his state. He is a five star gun grabber. I will not vote for him.

jdun on July 16, 2009 at 6:43 PM

No “revisionist history” is implicit in my statement. The fact remains that Levin, Hannity, and Ingraham endorsed Romney, and no spin changes that.

That’s like saying “Andrew Sullivan endorsed Bush, and no spin changes that”.

Sorry, but things tends to change with time. Conservatives fell behind Romney as a last minute attempt to stop McCain. So did I, but that doesn’t mean we will support Romney in 2012. I listen to Levin & Rush on a daily basis, and neither of them has said a positive thing about Romney for ages.

Norwegian on July 16, 2009 at 6:44 PM

Seriously, the presidential campaign is far from starting and some are already calling potential Mitt supporters “Mittards.” How about we save the name calling and fighting for when the candidates actually announce?

terryannonline on July 16, 2009 at 6:52 PM

I voted Romney in the primaries and he better run again. America needs him and his integrity, intelligence, his communication skills (sans teleprompter) and his super successful leadership. He knows more about the challenges of interstate health insurance than the current congress who wrongly thinks one size fits all. What is possible in Massachusetts might be impossible in California. Romney can do his best data-crunching and figure out what is best for cost controls and improving availability. Plus I trust him on foreign policy more than the other two. He is ready to lead, Palin, Huckabee, not so much and they are not so far talking about policy and the direction we ought to go. They all stand for conservative values, but Romney outshines them in leadership on the issues.

Lori on July 16, 2009 at 6:53 PM

Let me assure you, the “anyone but Palin” crowd is not going to flock to Huckabee. Almost everything that’s wrong with Palin is wrong with Huck, only Huck has zero fiscal/libertarian conservative bona fides. Huck is like Palin without the Jacksonianism or the “Grassroots Martyr” narrative to drive him.

Lehosh on July 16, 2009 at 6:58 PM

Hey, when was the last negative story or TV commentary on Huck or Mitt? Palin has taken a terrible beating from just about everyone and she’s a strong second place. That’s impressive. Could Huck and Mitt take this kind of beating and stay viable?
The answer to that question may well give you the clues to who will be the nominee.

Shotgun Messiah on July 16, 2009 at 7:03 PM

@racecar05 (about McCotter) “He’s totally an “unknown” though – needs to become more visible and make a name for himself nationally … I’m a big Aaron Schock fan …”

My more general point is that the Republican Party should look beyond Palin/Romney/Paul/Huckabee etc. to a new generation of Republicans, including guys like Aaron Schock. I hope the 2010 can replace the old boy network, bring in some young Iraq veterans and entrepreneurial, pro-capitalist types who do not come off as culturally stuck in the 1950s.

modifiedcontent on July 16, 2009 at 7:05 PM

Two words that Mitt not going to win POTUS.

Gun Owners.

He supports the assault ban and maintain it in his state. He is a five star gun grabber. I will not vote for him.

jdun on July 16, 2009 at 6:43 PM

You are talking about a position from which Romney has since distanced himself. The linked article reports that Mitt joined the NRA in August 2006.

However, the fact that he once was a proponent of gun control laws will admittedly be a strike against him, and of that there can be no dispute. The question is whether his positives would, in the primary voters’ minds, outweigh that negative. I personally hope they would, but only time will tell.

OneVision on July 16, 2009 at 7:06 PM

Eric Cantor & Paul Ryan could have great possibilities in the not so distant future me thinks.

omnipotent on July 16, 2009 at 7:10 PM

Lehosh on July 16, 2009 at 6:58 PM

Mormon?

TimeTraveler on July 16, 2009 at 7:10 PM

How about doing 8 mth. of Romney bashing like what has been done to Gov. Palin then take a poll.Romney or Huckabee would not get 2% PS Rush is right live with it.

thmcbb on July 16, 2009 at 7:14 PM

The linked article reports that Mitt joined the NRA in August 2006.

OneVision on July 16, 2009 at 7:06 PM

In other words, Romney decided to make a run for the GOP nomination in the summer of 2006, and he thought being a NRA member would be beneficial. Unlike Palin, who joined as a life-time member years before she even considered runnning for office.

That’s the problem with Romney. The man has no political core. You almost get the impression that he tossed a coin on whether or not he was going to run as a moderate or conservative. Look up old footage of Romney on YouTube debating Ted Kennedy in 1994, and you get the sense that he is a Charlie Crist RINO.

Norwegian on July 16, 2009 at 7:16 PM

Eric Cantor & Paul Ryan could have great possibilities in the not so distant future me thinks.

omnipotent on July 16, 2009 at 7:10 PM

I used to think so, and then they voted for the socialist AIG tax. That made me write them off for any office higher than House of Representatives.

Norwegian on July 16, 2009 at 7:18 PM

Mormon?

TimeTraveler on July 16, 2009 at 7:10 PM

Hardly. I just can’t stand snake-oil salesmen like Huckabee.

Or anyone who taxes nursing home beds, or calls opponents of illegal immigration “anti-Christian and anti-Life”, or clemencies a thousand dangerous criminals because they claim to “find Jesus” in prison. What kind of idiot believes someone when they say they found Christ in prison? Criminals go to prison and “find” two people before their parole hearing: Christ and Allah.

Lehosh on July 16, 2009 at 7:20 PM

@omnipotent, Paul Ryan is great. Not so sure about Eric Cantor anymore. I’ve seen recent tv appearances where he came across way too slick and weaselly.

modifiedcontent on July 16, 2009 at 7:21 PM

Romney is a good man, but he does seem to modify his positions depending on what office he runs for. Most pols do this to a point, but his record is shaky here. Plus, how does he run against Nobama on healthcare and guns?

Shotgun Messiah on July 16, 2009 at 7:21 PM

“… I used to think so, and then they voted for the socialist AIG tax …”

Right, I think that’s what I saw. Did Paul Ryan go along with that as well?

modifiedcontent on July 16, 2009 at 7:22 PM

If Romney and Palin both intend to run for president either in 2012 or 2016 they need to sit down and have some long talks. Things are getting very nasty in America and it is not the time for the republican frontrunners to start tearing each other down. The economy is not getting better and it will not with the things barry is doing. When 2012 rolls around, if we are allowed to have elections, the republicans need to be united and working like a swiss watch. Romney will be the guy because of the economy, Palin will be able to spearhead a sane and aggressive energy policy and be able to get out in the country and be Romney’s standard bearer. Palin will still be a young woman in 2020. If these two get in the white house and do what they are capable of doing then Palin can follow Romney 8 years later. But things are too precarious right now, if they do get the chance in 2012 (and I’m not convinced there will be a presidential election)they need to make sure they take the white house. huckabee style nasty politics will sink the republicans and the country with them.

peacenprosperity on July 16, 2009 at 7:24 PM

Or what about Romney-Powell? 99.99% of all conservatives would sit home on election day.

Norwegian on July 16, 2009 at 5:50 PM

No we wouldn’t.

Mao Jacket and heading to ACORN to volunteer.

Sapwolf on July 16, 2009 at 7:25 PM

Paul Ryan is great. Not so sure about Eric Cantor

They are both boehner toadies. Get over them.

peacenprosperity on July 16, 2009 at 7:25 PM

No “revisionist history” is implicit in my statement. The fact remains that Levin, Hannity, and Ingraham endorsed Romney, and no spin changes that.

You go ahead and keep partying like its 2008. The rest of us go on to the future.

portlandon on July 16, 2009 at 7:25 PM

Right, I think that’s what I saw. Did Paul Ryan go along with that as well?

modifiedcontent on July 16, 2009 at 7:22 PM

I am afraid so…

Here’s the list of House GOP members I have lost confidence in. Both Cantor and Ryan are on it.

Norwegian on July 16, 2009 at 7:26 PM

peacenprosperity on July 16, 2009 at 7:24 PM

Screw you!

Romney is the veep, and the Cuda is the top.

Get used to it.

Sapwolf on July 16, 2009 at 7:26 PM

I would vote for Mitt If Palin looks weak in the primaries.

TimeTraveler on July 16, 2009 at 6:08 PM

For you it would have to be an open primary.

Sapwolf on July 16, 2009 at 7:29 PM

Can a truce be made here folks? No more Mittard or Palinista crap? It’s like a circular firing squad in here. Both Palin & Mitt are 1000% better than Obahmbo on their WORST day. This struggle for the mantle will be the death of any hope of getting Obama to the 1 term President column.

portlandon on July 16, 2009 at 7:29 PM

That’s the problem with Romney. The man has no political core.

The man ran for governor of massachusetts for gods sake. They weren’t witches they burned at the stake way back when, they were conservatives. A Reagan conservative would never be elected governor of that state. Yes he moderated his views while campaigning but he governed conservative. And don’t say “what about health care”! The program he implemented was sound and as soon as he was out of office the democrats started screwing with it and made it a mess. Romney knows how money and the economy works. He is a CEO and that’s what this country needs.

peacenprosperity on July 16, 2009 at 7:29 PM

I am a strong Christan and i believe Huckabee is nothing more than a phoney snake oil salesman who hoodwinks a lot of well meaning Christan Consev.You can see this guy coming a mile away.I am a big Palin supporter but as a last resort i could support Romney but never never the Hucksteer.

thmcbb on July 16, 2009 at 7:30 PM

“They are both boehner toadies. Get over them.”

Thanks. Live and learn…

modifiedcontent on July 16, 2009 at 7:31 PM

Wait until Palin, Huckabee and any other Republican primary candidates start playing Romney sound bites from his Massachusetts campaigns and discussing RomnetCare.

Right now, Romney is the choice of the media and RINOs, which earns him a place in Allah’s heart (right next to Heffer McCain).

bw222 on July 16, 2009 at 7:31 PM

I voted Romney in the primaries and he better run again. America needs him and his integrity, intelligence, his communication skills (sans teleprompter) and his super successful leadership. He knows more about the challenges of interstate health insurance than the current congress who wrongly thinks one size fits all. What is possible in Massachusetts might be impossible in California. Romney can do his best data-crunching and figure out what is best for cost controls and improving availability. Plus I trust him on foreign policy more than the other two. He is ready to lead, Palin, Huckabee, not so much and they are not so far talking about policy and the direction we ought to go. They all stand for conservative values, but Romney outshines them in leadership on the issues.

Lori on July 16, 2009 at 6:53 PM

I could have dropped him with one punch at CPAC. And I weigh 136 lbs.

He’s a wuss.

Sapwolf on July 16, 2009 at 7:33 PM

Romney is a RINO who belongs to a cult. Not gonna happen.

bill30097 on July 16, 2009 at 7:33 PM

And don’t say “what about health care”! The program he implemented was sound and as soon as he was out of office the democrats started screwing with it and made it a mess. Romney knows how money and the economy works. He is a CEO and that’s what this country needs.

peacenprosperity on July 16, 2009 at 7:29 PM

Have not read much about RomneyCare lately, have you?

bw222 on July 16, 2009 at 7:34 PM

Eric Cantor & Paul Ryan could have great possibilities in the not so distant future me thinks.

omnipotent on July 16, 2009 at 7:10 PM

Cantor ended any possibility of my support when he voted for the GIVE/SLAVE Act.

Don’t know who Paul Ryan is. Pawlenty? Seems like a nice guy. I like Huckabee too. I trust him and respect him. But we don’t need a nice guy, we need warchiefs now.

I like Mitt on economy, he might have the ability to help fix the mess, but on everything else he seems like an effete liberal. Maybe Palin could appoint him Treasury czar.

poplicola on July 16, 2009 at 7:35 PM

People,

We need courage and guts, and a CONSERVATIVE FCOL.

Sapwolf on July 16, 2009 at 7:40 PM

Romney – no chance, Mormon
Palin – no chance, already hated by the media and many Americans
Huckabee – slim and none, at best

Hey, that’s just the way it is. Repubs sure as hell better not be counting on this group.

Moesart on July 16, 2009 at 7:40 PM

Paul Ryan would be a dynamite Budget Director. Perfect for that role.

He can talk numbers and fiscally stuff real good.

Sapwolf on July 16, 2009 at 7:41 PM

portlandon on July 16, 2009 at 7:29 PM

peacenprosperity on July 16, 2009 at 7:24 PM

Amen to both of you good people. We need unity to defeat Obambi. Infighting will result in yet another 4 more years of the nightmare we are already enduring.

OneVision on July 16, 2009 at 7:46 PM

Too late now, ya’ll should have jumped on the Romney bandwagon last year.

Romney, a Republican, won the governorship in liberal Massachusetts. What do Huckabee and Palin have to show for that? Nothin’.

Seixon on July 16, 2009 at 7:47 PM

WRONG

SHE WILL GET IT

TimeTraveler on July 16, 2009 at 5:26 PM

Because she is a quitter? How so?

csdeven on July 16, 2009 at 7:48 PM

All of you Romney-haters talk a big game, but when it comes down to it, if Romney’s the GOP nominee, you’ll vote for him in a heartbeat to oust Obama.

So go ahead, act all defiant now…we all know you’ll show up on election day.

And if you don’t, you should be banned from saying one negative word about Obama when he’s reelected in 2012 because of your stubbornness.

nickj116 on July 16, 2009 at 7:49 PM

Any of the three would be vastly preferable to the current administration.

acasilaco on July 16, 2009 at 7:50 PM

Romney, a Republican, won the governorship in liberal Massachusetts.
Seixon on July 16, 2009 at 7:47 PM

And they act shocked that Mitt had to govern from the center-right. That’s what Repubs have to do in Liberal states, sorry…

nickj116 on July 16, 2009 at 7:51 PM

C’mon, Captain Ed. Where are my Pawlenty numbers?

toetotoetotoe on July 16, 2009 at 7:57 PM

Sarah knows she has no shot in 2012. She will accept this and realize that with her help, Mitt will be the nominee in 2012. Real conservatives would never vote for a bigot like Huckabee. But they would hold their nose and vote for Mitt if needed.

Then in 2020, she’ll have the organization in place to run an effective campaign.

csdeven on July 16, 2009 at 7:57 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4