Dems appoint big donors to financial investigation committee
posted at 1:36 pm on July 16, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
When Congress puts together bipartisan blue-ribbon committees, the intent is to remove the taint of electoral politics from their deliberations — or at least to leave that impression with voters. More often than not, though, the appointees themselves are political hacks, and the best result is that the two parties equal each other out in hackery. Keep that in mind as the Democrats announce their appointments to the panel tasked with investigating the financial-sector meltdown last year:
Speaker [Nancy Pelosi] … appointed:
- Phil Angelides as chairman of the Commission. … Mr. Angelides, one of Speaker Pelosi’s three appointments to the commission, served with distinction as the elected California State Treasurer from 1999 to 2007. He has earned national recognition as an effective public and private sector leader with broad expertise and accomplishments in the fields of investor protection, housing, finance, and corporate and financial market reform.
- Brooksley Born, who was appointed by President Clinton as Chair of the Commodities Futures Trading Commission from 1996-1999. As the top Federal overseer of commodities and futures markets, she presciently warned about the need to reduce unwarranted risk in our financial system by strengthening regulatory oversight of over-the-counter financial derivatives products, such as credit default swaps. Born is a 2009 recipient of the “Profile in Courage Award” from the John F. Kennedy Library Foundation.
- John W. Thompson, who is Chairman of the Board of Directors of Symantec Corporation, a leading security software provider. Prior to his retirement in April 2009, Mr. Thompson led Symantec as Chief Executive Officer for 10 years. As Symantec CEO, he championed corporate responsibility, effective corporate governance, and strong business ethics policies and procedures.
Majority Leader [Harry] Reid appointed:
- Senator Bob Graham, the former U.S. Senator and former Governor of Florida. Senator Graham brings a wealth of experience and understanding of finance to this appointment from his years of service as a senior member of the Senate Finance Committee. He also served as the Chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee and, in that role, co-sponsored a bill that lead to the creation of the Director of National Intelligence position. Currently, Senator Graham is leading the Bob Graham Center for Public Service at the University of Florida, his alma mater.
- Heather Murren, a retired Managing Director for Global Securities Research and Economics at Merrill Lynch. At Merrill Lynch, Ms. Murren was the group head for Global Consumer Products Equity Research. In 2004, she was recognized by Las Vegas magazine of the Las Vegas Review-Journal as one of the Influential Businesswomen of the year. Ms. Murren is the Co-Founder and Chairman of the Board for Nevada Cancer Institute. Ms. Murren is a graduate of Johns Hopkins University and a chartered financial analyst.
- Byron Georgiou, who is a Las Vegas-based businessman and attorney. Mr. Georgiou serves on the advisory board of the Harvard Law School Program on Corporate Governance which hosts the leading blog on corporate governance and financial regulation. Mr. Georgiou is the President of Georgiou Enterprises, a company with a wide range of business interests from international carbon emission reductions projects to residential and commercial real estate and golf course management and development.
Let’s take a look at each of these appointments in regards to their political contributions to Barack Obama and others in the 2008 cycle:
- Phil Angelides: $4600 to Barack Obama, $34,500 to the DCCC, $5400 to the DSCC, $23,900 to the DNC
- Brooksley Born: $4600 to Barack Obama
- John Thompson: $4600 to Barack Obama, $9800 to various state Democratic committees in odd amounts, $26,700 to the DCCC
- Heather Murren: $4600 to Harry Reid, $28,500 each to the DSCC and the NRSC, $10,000 to the Nevada Democratic Party
- Byron Georgiou: $57,000 to the DSCC, $4600 to Barack Obama, $3000 to Nancy Pelosi
Money can’t buy you love, but it can buy you a seat on government commissions, can’t it? (h/t HA reader Eric H)










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
What did Bob donate, if any?
upinak on July 16, 2009 at 1:39 PM
Hope and Change *facepalm*
Murren is an especially egregious choice. Did I read that right…MERRILL LYNCH!
Laura in Maryland on July 16, 2009 at 1:42 PM
so much for draining that swamp of corruption…
SHARPTOOTH on July 16, 2009 at 1:43 PM
Business as usual.
SouthernGent on July 16, 2009 at 1:44 PM
Watch the other five just in case the get some crazy idea to point a finger at congress?
WashJeff on July 16, 2009 at 1:45 PM
Who’s in your wallet?
Akzed on July 16, 2009 at 1:47 PM
Gangsters.
forest on July 16, 2009 at 1:48 PM
Most ethical congress EVAH!!!!!!!!
TrickyDick on July 16, 2009 at 1:48 PM
I guess they ran out of Ambassadorships
JIMV on July 16, 2009 at 1:48 PM
Keith Hennessey was appointed by Republicans. He plans to write about it over the next 17 months on his blog.
msmveritas on July 16, 2009 at 1:50 PM
Time to partition Iraq?
WashJeff on July 16, 2009 at 1:50 PM
Do you know what shuck and jive is?
tarpon on July 16, 2009 at 1:50 PM
I thought Pelosi said she was going to end the “culture of corruption” that had her underpants in such a tight knot three years ago.
So far, it looks as though corruption in Washington is growing in exponential lockstep with the ballooning deficit. And that’s just what we can see. Who knows what lurks behind the opaque transparency of the Obama regime.
PoodleSkirt on July 16, 2009 at 1:51 PM
Term. Limits. To be enforced by public hangings.
Flyover Country on July 16, 2009 at 1:54 PM
Why bother?
It’s Greenspan’s fault (he kept interest rates too low for too long), and Bernanke is making everything worse.
Without the Fed, “there would likely be be no inflation, we’d have steady economic growth, no bubbles/bursts, no malinvestment, we’d have a relatively tranquil financial world, there would be a greater amount of wealth, and the Welfare-Warfare state would be harder to finance.”
Rae on July 16, 2009 at 1:54 PM
I will not renew my Norton security. I’ll find a better one that doesn’t donate to people who want to ruin this Country.
hmfearny on July 16, 2009 at 1:54 PM
Here is idea for to protect against fraud, less regulation…maybe even no regulation. I for one think that government regulation provides cover for institutions such has stock markets, comoodity training, etc. People are lead to think this institutions are safe for us to use since the government is watching over them.
If no one was watching over them, fraud in these institutions would cause them to be less successful. They would have to fix themselves. Under the current regulatory environment, they can shift some blame to the government and ask for more regulation.
Let the NYSE, for example, police the companies on its exchange.
WashJeff on July 16, 2009 at 1:56 PM
The ONLY effective ethics reform is smaller government!
WashJeff on July 16, 2009 at 1:57 PM
In other news, the Pope is Catholic, water is wet, bears defecate in the woods, and Keith Olbermann is a douche.
Vic on July 16, 2009 at 1:59 PM
Ive noticed that a lot of liberal donors and high profile supporters have been receiving government appointments lately from the administration and congress. This makes me think that these donors and supporters are cashing in their chips now because they see the political writing on the wall and realize that it will be a hell of a lot harder to get on the Government gravy train after 2010.
Dreadnought223 on July 16, 2009 at 2:00 PM
This will amount to an official cover-up and rewriting of how Obama got elected.
Connie on July 16, 2009 at 2:02 PM
Almost as bad as putting Jaime Gorelick on the commission investigating the intelligence failures that led to 9/11. Leftists are corrupt pigs.
elduende on July 16, 2009 at 2:04 PM
I swear to God, I’d love to see the menu that these people ordered from. Wonder if you could get a combo platter that consists of ambassadorship, membership on a commission directly effecting your business interests, and a night in the Lincoln Bedroom.
highhopes on July 16, 2009 at 2:06 PM
I’m currently researching a problem, and attempting to get technical help from Symantec tech support.
The support I’m getting is appalling. Email returned because reply-to address not correct. Online contact email address not correct. Tech advice from help desk not appropriate. Degree of competence of tech support abysmal.
Online help desk requires that I enable remote assistance, and permit tech support total access to my system. Verification of credentials/identity of tech support impossible.
I don’t think I’ll be renewing my subscription to this product either.
Skandia Recluse on July 16, 2009 at 2:08 PM
They’re not even bothering to mask their corruption, are they?
This is where you end up when you have one side of the political aisle that has been thoroughly spoiled by being allowed to get away with anything without serious reprisals. I’m starting to think that nothing will change unless citizens turn vigilante and march on DC en masse and physically arrest and try these bottom-feeders themselves.
Aitch748 on July 16, 2009 at 2:08 PM
And she did. What you see in DC today isn’t your grandpa’s culture of corruption. Today’s CoC is bigger, more blantant, and more immune to prosecution than the old one ever was.
highhopes on July 16, 2009 at 2:09 PM
elduende on July 16, 2009 at 2:04 PM
Sarc/
Jaime Gorelick?
A great democrat if ever there was one!
She had no experience in finance and was made vice chair of FNMA (by Clinton?) and assured the regulators of how well the whole place was run, in the midst of a $9 Billion scandal. She did manage a three quarter of a million dollar bonus during the creative Raines scandal.
She understands theft. Or she should…
IlikedAUH2O on July 16, 2009 at 2:13 PM
What did HA reader Eric H donate?
Attila (Pillage Idiot) on July 16, 2009 at 2:15 PM
Is any of this really surprising? I mean, these are the same people who think of the UN as the perfect model for all governments.
logis on July 16, 2009 at 2:16 PM
Hell, I pirated my Norton/Symantec Anti-virus and broke the expiration code 10 years ago.
Screw ‘em…
Fuzzlenutter on July 16, 2009 at 2:20 PM
Pay to Play….
jeffn21 on July 16, 2009 at 2:21 PM
Angelides “served with distinction as the elected California State Treasurer from 1999 to 2007.” They’re shameless with this one but yeah, he is distinct per the current news from over there.
DanMan on July 16, 2009 at 2:35 PM
AVG is free.
Vic on July 16, 2009 at 2:43 PM
Phil Angelides proudest moment, of course, was in giving Sen. Jon Carry the opportunity to exhort students to work hard and study, so they didn’t end up like those poor, lazy, stupid people who end up joining the Army.
malclave on July 16, 2009 at 2:44 PM
None of the Republicans challenged the placement of Gorelick on the 9/11 “Commission”. Obviously those 900 purloined FBI files did their trick.
What was so pathetic about that entire farce was when John Ashcroft came before the panel as a witness. When he correctly noted that Gorelick should have been testifying under oath like him, instead of being a “Commissioner”, he was roundly booed by the Clinton kneepads in the gallery.
Del Dolemonte on July 16, 2009 at 3:07 PM
Obama got elected?
I thought I saw a hand come down from the heavens in Denver…saying “This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased,” and then a time warp carried us all to 20 January 2009, on the steps of the Capital.
coldwarrior on July 16, 2009 at 3:19 PM
Would somebody please give Nancy a tube of Dentu-Creme?
argos on July 16, 2009 at 4:22 PM
Not a thing, I assure you.
flipflop on July 16, 2009 at 8:38 PM