Soma online sales….

But in the end, you’re absolutely right. That’s why we have appellate judges that are more than one judge because each of us, from our life experiences, will more easily see different perspectives argued by parties.
But judges do consider all of the arguments of litigants. I have. Most of my opinions, if not all of them, explain to parties by the law requires what it does.
What does she even mean here? Not very well spoken, is she?
cs89 on July 14, 2009

Well, as a direct reading, she is saying that ALL judges $crew the pooch, so you need to shop for an appellate judge that will look at a case through the prism of personal bias, facts be dammed.

Kinda sorta the exact oppisit of what a judge should do,

A prism takes “light” and separates it into individual frequencies (the colors of the Rainbow).

SOTOMAYOR will choose what frequencies (the colors of the Rainbow) she sees, when the reality of what a judge should do is take ALL those frequencies (the colors of the Rainbow) “combined” them so as to “shine the light of truth” on the problem.

SOTOMAYOR: It’s not a question of choosing to see some facts or another, Senator. I didn’t intend to suggest that.

And suggest she didn’t.

She stated it as FACT, without question that she will choose what FACTS she sees and what FACTS she won’t see.

Not once, but 7 different times!

I “accept the proposition that a difference there will be by the presence of women and people of color on the bench, and that my experiences affect the facts I choose to see as a judge.”

WOW!

Un frigging believable!
Could someone ask her about the original OJ case and if she would have “chosen” to see/accept the DNA evidence?

Elections have consequences? So do revolutions. There are going to be melons in fruitbaskets some day and one of them might be that of a wise latina.

Not disturbing at all.

Anyway, one and a half minutes into it.. What’s up with her hyperspeed-blinking?

hmm..

O’REILLY’S BODYLANGUAGE EXPERT EXPLAINS, TONIGHT!

Monkei on July 14, 2009 at 5:10 PM

Congratulations. Your incompetent and corrupt president just appointed a stupid, inane woman who can’t utter a coherent sentence to the Supreme Court of the United States, you must be proud.

Glad to know that this dingbat can screw up the country even further than than your clown president already has.

Elections have consequences? So do revolutions. There are going to be melons in fruitbaskets some day and one of them might be that of a wise latina.

Compared to the “Smart Latina”Woman, Peg Bundy is Penthouse material. Most Latinas are pretty hot for a while, but the “Smart Latina” is coyote ugly.
Jeff from WI on July 14, 2009 at 6:26 PM

Can’t agree with your “hot for a while” remark. Down here in Texas I could show you some smokin’ hot Latinas in their 40s and 50s. But you are spot on about this “wise” one. Coyote ugly just doesn’t cover it. I think she’d scare the hell out of the thing in Aliens.

Jeff from WI on July 14, 2009 at 6:26 PM

Maybe its because she’s walking around in a cast, and can’t run away from me.

/I keed, I keed

Ugly on July 14, 2009 at 6:29 PM

lol

Anyway, the Comcast headlines crack me up.

This time it’s Sotomayor Pushes Back Hard.

Hahahahaha.

Maybe its because she’s walking around in a cast, and can’t run away from me.

/I keed, I keed

She’s obviously been backpedaling, and is either lying now, or was lying in the past.

That said, am I the only guy here that finds her oddly GMILFy? Probably. I thought Peg Bundy was hot back in the day.

Ugly on July 14, 2009 at 6:04 PM

Compared to the “Smart Latina”Woman, Peg Bundy is Penthouse material. Most Latinas are pretty hot for a while, but the “Smart Latina” is coyote ugly.

when she votes to overturn Roe v Wade?

There is no way she would be the nominee if there were any chance of that happening, unfortunately.

NoDonkey on July 14, 2009 at 4:44 PM

Oh ye of so little faith, Supreme Court nominees have notoriously voted contrary to the Presidents who have nominated them, look at Kennedy.

Sotomayor is a traditional Hispanic Catholic and voting down on Roe v Wade isn’t out of the ballpark.

Wonder if she had anything to do with Clinton’s pardoning of the Puerto Rican terrorists? I’m sure she was delighted about it.

A pox on the house of any Republican senator who votes Aye for her confirmation!

Geez, we’ve stooped to unheard of levels with this nomination. To think this women is going to be elevated to equal stature as John Roberts is just sickening.

I see Holder, Geithner, Clinton and the rest as just useful idiots, but this women gives off some evil vibes.

That said, am I the only guy here that finds her oddly GMILFy? Probably. I thought Peg Bundy was hot back in the day.

Well, Sotormayor was either being dishonest the seven times she pandered to her audience or she is being dishonest today.

Unfit to serve, period.

southsideironworks on July 14, 2009 at 4:34 PM

The beauty of being a liberal is that there is no question of are they lying.

She will sit on the bench longer than the guys and gals on the committee will live.

Monkei on July 14, 2009 at 5:10 PM

Really? She’s about the same age as Al Franken, who’s on that committee.