Video: Anti-abortion protester disrupts Sotomayor hearing
posted at 1:50 pm on July 13, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
It didn’t take long for the first disruption of the Sonia Sotomayor confirmation hearing to occur. An anti-abortion protester shouted about “unborn Latinos,” bringing Senator Dianne Feinstein’s questioning to a momentary halt:
The second disruption occured a couple of hours later; I’ll add the video to this post as soon as I get it.
I oppose abortion, but is this the correct strategy to fight it? We regularly roll our eyes at the Code Pink protests at Congressional hearings when they disrupt proceedings. They even got on Barney Frank’s nerves in March. These disruptions marginalize the legitimate efforts by pro-life activists to end the millions of abortions in the US.
As Life News attests, we need to emphasize the mainstream credibility of pro-life views in this administration:
During a Senate committee meeting on Friday, a leading pro-abortion senator was forced to admit that one of the health care bills pending in the Senate will include abortion coverage. After the admission, the Senate panel voted to include abortions in that version of a national health care plan.
Three pro-life senators used Thursday’s Senate HELP Committee meeting to force the leadership’s hand on its agenda of including abortion in a public health care plan.
Sen. Barbara Mikulski, a Maryland Democrat, stammered her way through an explanation of an amendment to the health care bill that would cover abortion.
When pressed by Sen. Orrin Hatch, a Utah Republican, she admitted that her language would force health insurance companies to contract with abortion groups like Planned Parenthood.
We need to keep pressing Congress to keep from expanding abortion in the US, especially by providing taxpayer funding for it, as Obamacare will do in a public plan if it follows the rules set forth for private-sector insurance.
Related Posts:
Breaking on Hot Air

Video: Ft. Hood shooter still drawing salary – $278,000 and counting

Chinese breach of Google in 2010 exposed counter-espionage data







Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 … 8 Next »
Somehow, I don’t see that happening.
GarandFan on April 26, 2013 at 2:53 PM
I’m fine with women having the choice. Why the hell would I want to watch an abortion or any operating procedure?!! I’m also fine with open heart surgery, doesn’t mean I have to subject myself to watching it.
lester on April 26, 2013 at 2:54 PM
So what exactly did Gosnell do wrong in your opinion that other abortionists don’t do?
Bitter Clinger on April 26, 2013 at 2:55 PM
+ 100..Excellent question..Unfortunately here is your answer..:):)
Dire Straits on April 26, 2013 at 2:55 PM
Progressivism is so progressive it mimics ancient paganism.
tom daschle concerned on April 26, 2013 at 2:55 PM
Your unadulterated idiocy never fails to disappoint.
A+
If in fact Dear Leader had “backbone”, why was he so afraid to address Planned Parenthood during his first term in office?
F-
Del Dolemonte on April 26, 2013 at 2:57 PM
Thank you for simplifying…
…YOURSELF.
Gosnell killed babies ‘the wrong way’.
Got it!
Thank you for the true liberal perspective!
Now, baby-killer, how about YOU tell us all the ‘right’ way to murder a baby?
Inquiring minds want to know!
Liam on April 26, 2013 at 2:57 PM
Losester claimed he could “simplify”?
Laughs, points.
viking01 on April 26, 2013 at 2:58 PM
Remember. According to liberal logic, “choice” doesn’t begin until the woman is pregnant. That’s why even though pro-lifers believe that people have a choice wether to have sex (protected or not), libs call them “anti-choice”. So by the lib logic, the decision wether ot have sex or not is not a choice. Therefor, they are pro-rape.
DethMetalCookieMonst on April 26, 2013 at 2:58 PM
Edited for accuracy.
Del Dolemonte on April 26, 2013 at 3:00 PM
If the “pro-choice” people truely wanted PP to continue to recieve federal funding simply for “women’s health”, then those same people would just start an organization “just like” PP except not perform abortions. Interesting how that has yet to happen……on the “pro-choice” side.
DethMetalCookieMonst on April 26, 2013 at 3:00 PM
Thank you, lester, for confirming that you’re as ghoulish as Armin, “nonpartisan”, and thuja.
Oh yeah, and Gosnell as well.
Might as well add Obama too.
22044 on April 26, 2013 at 3:00 PM
Wow. Really?
To the Nazis, Jews weren’t ‘actual humans’ either.
I’m pretty sure if you checked their DNA you’ll find they are not mole-crickets or preble’s meadow mice.
Dexter_Alarius on April 26, 2013 at 3:01 PM
Care to explain exactly how tax dollars “work” ?
The President is asking.
Jabberwock on April 26, 2013 at 3:01 PM
So are you ok with subjecting surgical abortion clinics to the same regulatory requirements as is required of facilities performing any other operating procedure?
weaselyone on April 26, 2013 at 3:01 PM
The 3 deadliest wars in the past 100 years fought by the US were run by Commanders-in-Chief from your Party. Take it up with them,
F-
Del Dolemonte on April 26, 2013 at 3:03 PM
“Small government” does not = “no government”.
DethMetalCookieMonst on April 26, 2013 at 3:05 PM
Illegal late term abortions among two dozen other things. Read the jury report:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kermit_Gosnell#Grand_Jury_report
lester on April 26, 2013 at 3:05 PM
Putting off your brain transplant yet again? For shame!
Del Dolemonte on April 26, 2013 at 3:05 PM
Murdering babies is okay with you, long as you don’t have to see it, even if only in your mind’s eye. Out of sight, out of mind…
I can’t sit though a film of abortion, because I never want to see an innocent baby be murdered.
YOU, on the other hand, can’t sit through such a thing because you’re too terrified of feeling guilty. You baby-killers can’t handle the human need to have guilt when you are so horribly wrong. Better to forget the whole thing instead of feeling guilty and maybe changing your mind.
You murdering liberal baby-killers can’t have THAT, can you?
Liam on April 26, 2013 at 3:06 PM
FIFY.
unclesmrgol on April 26, 2013 at 3:06 PM
lazy lester is too dim to realize that Planned Parenthood was founded by a Racist named Margaret Sanger. She also believed that the responsibility for birth control should remain in the hands of able-minded individual parents rather than the state.
Del Dolemonte on April 26, 2013 at 3:10 PM
Abortion in a nutshell.
Jabberwock on April 26, 2013 at 3:10 PM
I was in the car driving home this afternoon when Rush came on. He led with this particular quote from O.
It’s the exact thing I thought when I heard O’s closing remark.
Talk about the audacity of a dope.
jersey taxpayer on April 26, 2013 at 3:12 PM
Ooh! You called me a baby killer, that’s so cute and conservative of you.
Legally, abortion is not murder. You’re free to disagree and I’m sorry that your religious beliefs counter common sense and the law. Maybe you should try to establish your religion as the law. It was like that just a few centuries ago and as history tells us, it wasn’t pretty.
lester on April 26, 2013 at 3:12 PM
Probably because he doesn’t want to say a good word about the free market system. This puts him in the same boat as many “conservatives” who suddenly think additional federal regulation is just dandy when it comes to things they don’t like.
I suppose, in fairness, I should make a slight distinction though. Obama, as a dedicated progressive, simply does not believe in the free market system, period. Many of the “conservatives” calling for extra federal “oversight” of abortion actually do believe in the free market, which makes it that much more shameful for them to arbitrarily carve out little exceptions here and there when they want to shut down something they don’t like–they intuitively know that more clinics with fewer regulations would mean better services (and prices, for that matter), and that guys like Gosnell would never be able to survive without a de facto monopoly on a particular subset of abortion services, such as Gosnell enjoyed in Philadelphia for decades.
Armin Tamzarian on April 26, 2013 at 3:12 PM
Which they protest, scream, cry, whine, throw paint, etc, etc, etc.
Do you not allow us the same courtesy?
Also, what is this about “actual humans”? What do YOU think comes out of a womb? Not real humans? Aliens? Cats?
Ladies and Gentleman… your typical liberal in all its glory.
kim roy on April 26, 2013 at 3:12 PM
Keep telling yourself this story. Being imaginative is good for calming down some of that anger.
lester on April 26, 2013 at 3:13 PM
Armin Tamzarian on April 26, 2013 at 3:12 PM
“Free Market”? That’s not a commodity groing inside that woman. That’s a human life, you ghoul.
kingsjester on April 26, 2013 at 3:14 PM
He made the news.
Duh.
Rule number #1 of abortion keep all Gosnell centers out of the news.
tetriskid on April 26, 2013 at 3:15 PM
OT a bit, but many thanks for batting clean-up with lester and verbaluce the other day.
I was referring to your posts on the FBI idiocy regarding Islam.
I hit submit and was off to daughter’s softball. No chance to respond.
Great job taking them down.
Especially you, Lester.
Jabberwock on April 26, 2013 at 3:16 PM
Filth exposed.
And that same filth has taken America over, and will utterly destroy her.
Just like in the animal world – the leech, the cockroach, the mosquito, the tick and the flea outnumber the worker bee.
The blood-sucking filth have simply overwhelmed us.
And they breed – geometrically.
OhEssYouCowboys on April 26, 2013 at 3:17 PM
So you do believe there is a magical point where a fetus becomes a baby. And yet:
Aren’t babies “actual humans”? And wouldn’t follow that fetuses are “actual humans” if there is a point where they become babies? Or is all this making your head hurt?
Bitter Clinger on April 26, 2013 at 3:17 PM
To help you, Lester, here’s some iconic pictures of abortion:
a) Trophies:
http://www.trutv.com/library/crime/photogallery/kermit-gosnell-gallery.html?curPhoto=4
b) Snipping:
http://www.lifenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/gosnell38.jpg
Baby Boy B, above, was legally killed by Dr. Gosnell, because the judge in Gosnell’s case threw out the charge of his murder, and also threw out the charge that Dr. Gosnell abused Baby Boy B’s corpse when he stuck his body into a two gallon container and froze it.
My point: All the trophies above illustrate what you are defending. You don’t have to look at them, but you are defending their production.
Mr. Obama likewise did so — he voted against a law in Illinois which would have provided children like Baby Boy B the obstetric/pediatric care they needed.
unclesmrgol on April 26, 2013 at 3:18 PM
s/b “wouldn’t it follow”
Bitter Clinger on April 26, 2013 at 3:18 PM
Don’t worry about it. The amoral and psychopathic dehumanize (see: “actual humans”, “fetus”, “clump of cells”, “commodity”, etc) before they remove them.
It’s good to know what we are dealing with in order to combat it appropriately. Don’t be angry about them revealing themselves.
Now we know.
kim roy on April 26, 2013 at 3:18 PM
You are indeed right. And, at one point, slavery was legal too.
unclesmrgol on April 26, 2013 at 3:19 PM
Same constitution that protects right to privacy also protects right to free speech. I have no right to take away that courtesy even if I wanted to (hint: I don’t).
Single cell -> Collection of cells -> Viable fetus -> Newborn
Not all of that is legally a human being. The law draws that border and crossing it lands people in court.
lester on April 26, 2013 at 3:19 PM
Dear Lester,
RedBull, Nyquil, and a keyboard can be a bad combination on one’s sensibilities.
Just abstain from all three and give the other commentors a break.
M,kay?
drowningpuppies on April 26, 2013 at 3:20 PM
Cool post, J.
It’s good to see these kinds of posts – especially in a war against Communist filth.
Band of Brothers, on HotAir.
OhEssYouCowboys on April 26, 2013 at 3:20 PM
For all the emotion-laden rhetoric from those who oppose abortion, the issue remains the same: Who will control the decision to give birth? The pregnant woman or the state?
The government that can compel a woman to carry a pregnancy to term through denial of access to abortion is the same government that can decide to compel a woman to abort a wanted pregnancy for whatever reason it chooses.
Two sides of the same coin.
The conservative position on reproductive rights is to keep the government OUT of personal family planning decisions. I find it amazing so-called conservatives in this country just don’t get it.
chumpThreads on April 26, 2013 at 3:20 PM
And, legally, Jim Crow laws weren’t racist.
Funny, but religious laws tend to be common sense and have been law for thousand of years. Who’s the dinosaur here, as you seek to imply?
Liberals like you seek a fiefdom and, as you said, it was never pretty.
What is wrong with you, that you feel need to return to the 12th Century?
Liam on April 26, 2013 at 3:20 PM
As postulated by Margaret Sanger ; get a few black preachers on board and they’ll complete the kkk’s work in extermination these undesirables in the name of God.
Better for him that a millstone be tied around that scrawny neck and tossed into the deepest sea to join his brother in arms OBL.
AH_C on April 26, 2013 at 3:20 PM
God bless all the potentially actual humans
longfeet on April 26, 2013 at 3:21 PM
This is why I hold no illusions that we will continue to lose because we cede the language and the ground.
We need to get into the dirt with them and take it back. Until we do that and quit playing by the Marquis de Queensbury rules we will continue to get nowhere.
kim roy on April 26, 2013 at 3:21 PM
The conservative position on reproductive rights is to keep the government OUT of personal family planning decisions. I find it amazing so-called conservatives in this country just don’t get it.
chumpThreads on April 26, 2013 at 3:20 PM
The Conservative position is to value life and act responsibly.
Idiot.
kingsjester on April 26, 2013 at 3:21 PM
You need your denial.
People better than you have reality.
Liam on April 26, 2013 at 3:23 PM
You have missed Conservative with Ultimate Individualist. But do keep trying. You might eventually make a point.
nobar on April 26, 2013 at 3:24 PM
when you think about it, the Tsarnaev brothers just waited a little longer than Gosnell. I guess that explains all the empathy pouring in for Joker from the left. Slaughtering is ok so long as you have the right back story.
crrr6 on April 26, 2013 at 3:24 PM
Babies are, a collection of cells is not. And the point is not magical, it’s legal.
lester on April 26, 2013 at 3:24 PM
I ***WANT*** you to keep talking. I like it. It exposes you.
I’m wondering about your usage of “actual human”. What do you think that single cell becomes? Is there a chance it will be a cat? Alien? An apple?
Just a very revealing choice of words.
Carry on.
kim roy on April 26, 2013 at 3:24 PM
On a good day, I really want to punch him in the face. I’ll just leave it at that.
MustLoveBlogs on April 26, 2013 at 3:24 PM
*mixed
nobar on April 26, 2013 at 3:24 PM
lester, you appear to be a male.
As a female, I believe neither you nor any politician should be “in women’s private parts and private business” INCLUDING
forcing me or my family to pay for abortion, let alone infanticide.
How dare YOU or any politician think they have the RIGHT to force Americans with any religious conviction–not those who simply say “God bless…”, but those who PRACTICE it–to demand we pay for YOUR SINS.
May God have mercy on your souls.
jersey taxpayer on April 26, 2013 at 3:25 PM
Because pre-empting human life is a sure fire way to ensure no human life exists.
Jabberwock on April 26, 2013 at 3:25 PM
Please expand on this logic…
weaselyone on April 26, 2013 at 3:26 PM
That’s because we’re conservatives, not libertarians. Libertarians look at regulations and say “no”. Conservatives look at regulations and say “I don’t think so”. See the difference? We’re more than willing to accept regulations if we see a need for it. And safety is a legitimate place to have regulation – although we may disagree on the amount. In this case, shouldn’t any “women’s health” center be regulated as any other medical health facility? Evidently there are folks on your side who don’t think so; to the point of effectively removing all regulations (by not inspecting) governing abortion clinics in PA.
Jeff Weimer on April 26, 2013 at 3:26 PM
It would be better to have a president who was outraged that live babies had their backbones snipped….rather than one who went to get a tongue bath from the ghouls who enabled Kermit Gosnell.
HumpBot Salvation on April 26, 2013 at 3:26 PM
YOU have no understanding of Conservatism. YOU are a liberal.
When was the last time a liberal got anything right?
Liam on April 26, 2013 at 3:28 PM
And to use the enforcement powers of the government to do so, apparently. Michael Bloomberg is a conservative according to you since he is using the government to compel people to “act responsibily” and “value life” by not consuming unhealthy soft drinks that can lead to obesity, heart disease, and other health problems.
Armin Tamzarian on April 26, 2013 at 3:28 PM
I remember seeing “Natural Born Killers” and “Pulp Fiction” the same week. Liked NBK more. Not sure why because in many ways PF is the superior movie.
Perhaps it was the prophetic feeling to it. Funny that an Oliver Stone movie would be years ahead of itself and eerily predict the liberal/celeb mindset.
kim roy on April 26, 2013 at 3:28 PM
Planned Parenthood:
“Millions served.”
drowningpuppies on April 26, 2013 at 3:29 PM
I like that you brought it up. Slavery and Jim Crow were both abandoned in favor of progress. Bans on abortions were also lifted as we advanced.
The good old “murder was good, theft was good, marriage didn’t exist until Jesus set foot on earth” non-argument.
You seem to be the one trying to turn everything back. I think progressive is a pretty descriptive term.
lester on April 26, 2013 at 3:31 PM
If Jim Crow laws were wrong, why do you claim abortion laws are perfectly ‘right’?
Liam on April 26, 2013 at 3:31 PM
Armin Tamzarian on April 26, 2013 at 3:28 PM
You sound as soulless as one of the guards at Dachau.
Banning soft drinks does not equate to killing babies.
Try something else.
kingsjester on April 26, 2013 at 3:31 PM
Take a look at China with its one-child policy. The result is forced abortions.
Once it becomes accepted in principle that the government can determine when a woman must give birth, there is nothing to deter it from deciding when a woman may not give birth.
It has entered the realm of personal family planning decision making, and those who desire this as a means of stopping abortion, fail to understand that government policies can change. The government that is anti-abortion today may one day promulgate mandatory abortion as one of its accepted powers.
chumpThreads on April 26, 2013 at 3:35 PM
Okay, fine. You win, okay?
I’m going to come over to YOUR side, and just let all you liberals abort your babies. Conservative mothers will not take that option; let them be dregs!
But all you liberals can freely kill your own offspring. As a matter of fact, now being on YOUR side and all, I encourage it!
You won me over, lester.
Abortion to the max for liberals!
Liam on April 26, 2013 at 3:36 PM
You obviously are clueless about what backbone means.
Schadenfreude on April 26, 2013 at 3:36 PM
Oops, sorry.
Should have written…
Planned Parenthood:
“Millions severed.”
drowningpuppies on April 26, 2013 at 3:36 PM
Christians don’t like right to abortion, Scientologists don’t like Psycology. Muslims don’t like… I don’t know what they don’t like about medicine but probably a lot.
Religions should not decide on government policy.
lester on April 26, 2013 at 3:36 PM
Obama is for infanticide, like China and India.
Schadenfreude on April 26, 2013 at 3:37 PM
I’m just using your own standards. You did say that the “conservative” position is to “value life and act responsibly” didn’t you? Of course, that’s hopelessly broad. It invites and justifies virtually any kind of government regulation you can think of. I’d really like for you to present an argument explaining how Michael Bloomberg is not meeting the incredibly, meaninglessly low bar you’ve set for the definition of “conservatism”. Every gun grabber, tree hugger and bible thumper in existence believes they’re acting “responsibly”. Your language is the language of tyrants and control freaks.
Armin Tamzarian on April 26, 2013 at 3:37 PM
I love it when you can’t tell them apart. Good lord, so tedious and pedantic.
somewhatconcerned on April 26, 2013 at 3:38 PM
communism and socialism are ‘religions’.
Schadenfreude on April 26, 2013 at 3:38 PM
Lets try a simple thought experiment: How did Europe get to where it is today?
Answer: If abortion is too common, then people take it too much, to the point that nations start importing people (with no common values with the natives).
nobar on April 26, 2013 at 3:38 PM
Armin Tamzarian on April 26, 2013 at 3:28 PM
Bloomberg is a nazi…which is ironic, for a Jew.
Schadenfreude on April 26, 2013 at 3:39 PM
1. Liberals do not believe in the “right to privacy” as evidenced by the warrant-less wiretaps, snooping on emails, etc. Worse than Bush.
“Right to privacy” for a liberal means I don’t know how basic biology works.
2. The trends are against you. Younger voters are not as stupid. They understand basic science. They are for life. Just like slavery was defeated it will be as well.
tetriskid on April 26, 2013 at 3:39 PM
If 95% of blacks voted GOP, he would be making that claim. To them, human life is measured by their usefulness to liberal orthodoxy.
crrr6 on April 26, 2013 at 3:40 PM
You are so…uninformed.
Religion is a personal matter, as is a vote of personal conscience.
YOU know nothing about people, do you?
Liam on April 26, 2013 at 3:40 PM
Actually a better comparison would be CT vs Gosnall. See CT was bad because Obastard and all the little d-bag libturds can try and milk it for gun control and other bits of agenda but because the Gosnall killings can’t be used to advance his agenda they don’t exist.
You forget that the libturds are so effing stupid that they support the organization of a hateful racist b*tch who advocated Eugenics to try and wipe out blacks. Why else would most clinics been in heavily minority areas? Buth then what does one expect out of the same scum that brought you the KKK.
Frankly libturds are nothing more than cockroaches and it is a total waste of time to reason or even speak to them.
bbinfl on April 26, 2013 at 3:42 PM
Your language is the language of tyrants and control freaks.
Armin Tamzarian on April 26, 2013 at 3:37 PM
John Adams “tyrant and control freak”?
Mother Teresa “tyrant and control freak”?
What else you got?
kingsjester on April 26, 2013 at 3:42 PM
And chumpy too? We have a troll hole on this thread!
somewhatconcerned on April 26, 2013 at 3:42 PM
He’s a typical liberal: heartless.
Just to be simplistic, every baby deserves a kiss even from a stranger.
Liam on April 26, 2013 at 3:43 PM
Logic fail. The pro-life movement is all about granting individual rights to the unborn. The debate is about whether or not the unborn should have the right to life, not whether the mother should have the right to choose.
weaselyone on April 26, 2013 at 3:43 PM
What are you even getting at here? Are you suggesting that Europe has had incredibly high rates of abortion, to the extent that it’s decimated its native populations? That’s quite a claim and I’d love to see some statistics to back it up. I’d also like to know why the US and Canada, with even more lax abortion laws than most European countries, haven’t experienced the same result.
If Bloomberg is a Nazi for trying to ban soda, what does that make someone who wants to ban abortion?
Armin Tamzarian on April 26, 2013 at 3:43 PM
And being Dumb as Hell is good for….being Dumb as Hell.
ToddPA on April 26, 2013 at 3:44 PM
Question: Is it at all possible for you to understand simple meanings and phrases or are you so indoctrinated with progressive word-twisting that everything must be spelled out in ultra-plain language?
nobar on April 26, 2013 at 3:45 PM
I like how you didn’t even try to respond to my argument, or present a real one of your own. Why do you even bother?
Armin Tamzarian on April 26, 2013 at 3:45 PM
A person who hates the idea of killing an innocent.
In short, the exact opposite of a liberal.
Liam on April 26, 2013 at 3:45 PM
Progressivism just is Christianity grown so pure that it understands itself (correctly) to be more Christian than the Jesus. Same point of view. Same evangelicalist furor. Same infinite demands. Same magical thinking as wish fulfillment. If you mean by “paganism” Greek philosophy, then you have both ends exactly backwards.
Shouldn’t you be ministering to the inmates and sick and poor right now instead of complaining? So long as one person anywhere on the planet is suffering, it is your love commandment to serve them.
kunegetikos on April 26, 2013 at 3:45 PM
At what point is the soda alive? How do the two items even equal each other?
bbinfl on April 26, 2013 at 3:46 PM
Why stop there? If we force people to reproduce then we will have babies. The potential
babiesactual human beings that never existed because we didn’t force people to reproduce were all murdered.Think of the potential of those potential and their potential… OH MY GAAAWD! There are literally eleventy trillions of babies being murdered every day. Such a horror!
Carry on with that “logic”.
lester on April 26, 2013 at 3:46 PM
Ah, legal distinctions. Remember, an AR-15 is a “legal” firearm next time you want to whine about gun control.
And is that “collection of cells” alive or not?
Bitter Clinger on April 26, 2013 at 3:48 PM
Oh, I do understand them. I understand them better than the people using them, apparently. But maybe you can help me here by defining what exactly the phrase “value life and act responsibly” means?
Armin Tamzarian on April 26, 2013 at 3:48 PM
At what point are these people having these oh so necessary abortions getting forced to f**k each other?
bbinfl on April 26, 2013 at 3:49 PM
That makes no sense whatsoever. What are you babbling about? It’s incoherent.
What a terrible attempt at distraction and deflection.
I’m still wondering about your word choice of “actual human”. You want to discuss that?
kim roy on April 26, 2013 at 3:50 PM
Bloomberg says the constitution is dead, after Boston.
Gosnell is about infanticide, not abortion.
PP knew about it and did nothing.
Obama knows and says nothing.
Schadenfreude on April 26, 2013 at 3:51 PM
You know, these threads would be a lot more enlightening and enjoyable for everyone if people even bothered to present actual arguments rather than stupid attempts at zingers like this.
Armin Tamzarian on April 26, 2013 at 3:51 PM
Seems you’ve now run out of ammo. Actually, you were already firing blanks. Now the chamber is completely empty.
Bitter Clinger on April 26, 2013 at 3:51 PM
Do you realize how stupid you sound? Murder is prohibited by law too. Oh, in what a police state we live!
crrr6 on April 26, 2013 at 3:52 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 … 8 Next »