SarahPAC raises $733,000 in first six months of 2009; Update: Rush wonders about third-party run
posted at 3:30 pm on July 13, 2009 by Allahpundit
Actually, that’s only a five-month total since the PAC wasn’t up and running until the end of January. By comparison, Romney’s PAC raised $1.4 million through the end of May, but then fundraising is pretty much Mitt’s full-time gig these days and he already has a polished team around him left over from the primaries. Let’s see what happens in the second half when he and Palin go toe-to-toe.
The most intriguing detail from Politico’s report:
The majority of the money raised by SarahPAC so far has come in the form of “unitemized contributions,” meaning donations of less than $200 each. PACS are not required to name those small donors in their filings with the FEC. The remaining money came through more than 700 different $200-plus contributions made by donors from all around the United States.
According to its FEC records, SarahPAC’s biggest expenditure during the reporting period was the more than $103,000 it spent on EDonation.com, a Virginia-based firm that specializes in online fundraising.
Not surprisingly, it sounds like she’s going to follow The One’s lead and turn her support among the base into a cash machine via small donations. In fact, one of the co-founders of Team Sarah has an op-ed in the Examiner today urging her to do exactly that. The only problem: Obama didn’t raise most of his money that way. In fact, percentage-wise, he raised less from contributions under $200 than Bush and Kerry did in 2004. What made him a fundraising juggernaut capable of taking down the Clinton machine was the small money he raised combined with his ability to peel off big donors and big party names from Billary. If Palin runs a true outsider campaign in 2012 and tries to win on the strength of the base alone, she risks being overwhelmed by Romney vacuuming up the big money from party chieftains. Which is to say, even an outsider needs “insiders.” Help her, Fred Malek, you’re her only hope!
Exit question: I’m told Glenn Beck was yelling about a third-party on the radio this morning, a subject that’s been on my mind lately. So choose, bearing in mind that a split conservative vote greatly benefits The One. See, e.g., Clinton’s two victories.
Update: He knows third parties are sure losers but the thought of a “true conservative” faction clearly has him intrigued.
When I watched her speech, when she announced that she was leaving the governorship of Alaska, I didn’t hear the word Republican mentioned once. If I’m Sarah Palin and I’m conservative — Republican Party’s been just as mean-spirited to her as the Democrats have. A lot of them have, a lot of Republican media, a lot of the so-called conservative media have been. I don’t know if she’s going to campaign for conservative Democrats but if she believes that conservatism is the way to go. The one thing that does slightly worry me about this is this whole third party business. Yeah, it’s remote but it’s still a possibility out there and there are a lot of people pushing a third party and that’s — Third parties, they lose, they just lose. Third parties never end up with a congressional or Senate candidates. It’s just not the way to go. We’ll save that for later if that actually begins to transpire, we see it beginning to transpire.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 … 10 Next »
In reference to Thomas Paine? Paine supported an earlier form of Social Security, publicly-funded education, progressive taxation, and guaranteed minimum income. Obama’s supposedly a great admirer.
People get too caught-up in the one essay and ignore the rest of him.
amerpundit on July 13, 2009 at 3:51 PM
The point of the poll is to see how she’d fair as a third party candidate.
Esthier on July 13, 2009 at 3:51 PM
Can anyone name at least six regular trolls?
VibrioCocci on July 13, 2009 at 3:51 PM
Had to be some Longhorns and Sooners.
:OP
OhEssYouCowboys on July 13, 2009 at 3:51 PM
LOL!
txag92 on July 13, 2009 at 3:51 PM
As opposed to what…2008? LOL!
Fletch54 on July 13, 2009 at 3:51 PM
Romney’s Pac raised $404,000 in the last 6 months, $1.4 million since it’s start.
“Palin’s PAC totals put her on par with fellow potential 2012 candidates. Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney’s PAC, Free and Strong America PAC, reported $404,000 raised in the first six months of this year for a total of $1.4 million raised.“
portlandon on July 13, 2009 at 3:52 PM
Michele Bachmann
guntotinglibertarian on July 13, 2009 at 3:52 PM
Along the lines of what CK wrote, I think the events that have transpired and no doubt will transpire, will make old categories such as “two parties” “third parties” insignificant. “Party” talk is the business of a body politic that has the luxury of leisure and time not to mention money. I think in the next two to three years, world events will force themselves upon all nation’s governments that will make “party” talk useless.
Weight of Glory on July 13, 2009 at 3:52 PM
Palin would never run as a 3rd party candidate. She’ll seek the GOP nomination and get it. The reason she’s not out there pushing the Republican party right now is for 2 reasons: 1) The GOP insiders hate her just as much as the Dems, so why bother tying herself to that bunch? and 2) She’s gonna campaign for conservative candidates, whether they be Republican, Democrat, or independent.
She’s gonna build a massive coalition of conservative Americans with the goal of taking this country back from the Beltway criminals who are spending us into bankruptcy. In the end, she’ll run as a Republican since she actually wants to win the damn election. But make no mistake. She’ll never sell herself out to the establishment the way Obama did.
Doughboy on July 13, 2009 at 3:52 PM
amerpundit on July 13, 2009 at 3:41 PM
Plus the don’t blame me, I voted for the other guy, aspect.
But really, for me it’s about voting my conscience, not a popularity contest to go with the one who you think will win.
aceinstall on July 13, 2009 at 3:52 PM
Romney isn’t going to win me. He’s just another insider to me.
I’m done with that.
AnninCA on July 13, 2009 at 3:52 PM
I’m not voting in this because I reject the premise of the poll.
Sarah Palin has not so much as hinted that she has an interest in mounting a third-party candidacy.
She’s been a Republican her entire life, despite not always having the best relationship with the institutional leadership.
The notion of Palin mounting a third-party candidacy has no basis in reality.
Robert_Paulson on July 13, 2009 at 3:52 PM
Common Sense referring to Glenn Beck’s book.
VibrioCocci on July 13, 2009 at 3:53 PM
What about the folks who want Palin as GOP, not third party? They might refrain from voting or vote Obama out of jest or protest to AP’s poll.
Thunderstorm129 on July 13, 2009 at 3:53 PM
Actually, if Sarah were to get the majority of the 40% who claim to be conservative and then could convince others to vote who have given up on politics and no longer do so, she could have a chance. I would prefer her to run as a Republican but if she runs third party I would vote for her unless the Republican candidate was as conservative as she is.
Rose on July 13, 2009 at 3:53 PM
I’d rather see Palin go totally NON-partisan–she never was the doctrinaire conservative that lefties imagined anyway. Let her find a conservative Democrat who can work with her to campaign across the country and marginalize the extremes on both sides. If it leads to a run in the future in any form, so be it.
DaveS on July 13, 2009 at 3:53 PM
People have been telling me that for years, yet each year the Republican party get’s more inept.
MarkTheGreat on July 13, 2009 at 3:53 PM
The it should have included Palin as GOP nominee as well.
Thunderstorm129 on July 13, 2009 at 3:54 PM
the poll votes so far support my call for Romney/Palin ’12
but I do really like Cheney/Cheney ’12 “We find your lack of faith distrubing’ (stolen from Ace HQ comments :0))
and I am the mod Dem, if you run a REAL conservative the mod Dems such as myself will follow
the GOP leadership needs to stop trying to be everything but what it is
with Sarah on the ticket she will bring the conservatives as she did last time
but hopefully the 5 mill GOP who stayed home and the mod Dems who bought the TOTUS Im a moderate media hype will ALL come out and vote as they did when Reagan ran…
ginaswo on July 13, 2009 at 3:54 PM
I have a question… Does anyone know what Palin’s stance on illegal immigration is? Knowing that she doesn’t share McCain’s squishiness would put me far more in her corner if she runs as a republican.
I oppose any conservative third party runs in 2012 because I do not want the dems to win due to a divided vote on our part. We can take the White House back in 2012, and we must do that… Our country cannot take four more years of Obama. He has already done so much harm both domestically and in the foreign policy realm.
I am open to any conservative on the republican side. I don’t care who it is… I just want someone who is steadfast and who believes in federalism.
squeek71 on July 13, 2009 at 3:54 PM
Let’s say this is true. Why does a third party automatically have to have a different nominee from the other 2? What if Republicans are allowed to run for the Conservative nomination? At the very least it will break out the numbers and force the candidates, at all levels, to pay attention instead of pish poshing the base.
Rocks on July 13, 2009 at 3:54 PM
I also must add, I think this post indicates a true fear from traditional GOP about her.
*boo*
She really does raise money.
AnninCA on July 13, 2009 at 3:54 PM
Which was a reference to Thomas Paine’s essay, as conceded by Beck himself.
amerpundit on July 13, 2009 at 3:54 PM
Spoken like a true Whig.
The meme that a Third party is always destructive is a narrative pushed by those who are partisan Republicans.
Problem is that the Republican brand is broken. It does not stand for anything EXCEPT being Anti Democrat. It is NOT Fical Con… It is NOT Libertarian… It is NOT Federalist… It is NOT for smaller Government… heck, when in power it did not even roll back Gun control legislation…
So, the question is, Is it Easier to GAIN trust, or regain trust once there has been betrayal.
Romeo13 on July 13, 2009 at 3:54 PM
No.
Abby Adams on July 13, 2009 at 3:54 PM
No, that’s a mistake by CQ. See, e.g., this report in WaPo in March noting that Romney had already raised $870,000 this year. I think the $404,000 figure is supposed to be his June total.
Allahpundit on July 13, 2009 at 3:55 PM
Your poll options are laughable. You forgot one.
“Palin as GOP Nominee”
portlandon on July 13, 2009 at 3:55 PM
Saw on the Democratic Underwear site where someone posted that Palin was going to start some kind of Christian Conservative Party or the like.
They were quite elated and several posters were in phantasmal ecstasy about how the Democratic Party would become the only party…forever and ever and ever and… Kind of like a Libtard Thousand Year Reich I guess.
Until I hear it officially I’m not buying it, though the idea is attractive it would be better to just have a Republican Party headed by those who actually are Republicans. They certainly don’t need to be ultra-Conservatives. Just plain old Conservative would do nicely. :-)
Dr. ZhivBlago on July 13, 2009 at 3:55 PM
Perhaps she joins the Alaska Independance party?
MarkTheGreat on July 13, 2009 at 3:55 PM
I’m not voting until I see the deeds. Pretty words got me from Truman to Obama, so I’m done with pretty words. If that means my vote goes the way of the Dodo I don’t care.
Any who run, dance, don’t sing.
Limerick on July 13, 2009 at 3:55 PM
Uppy,
Are there any pikas up in Alaska?
“Pikas for Palin!” “She’s warmblooded like us.”
:)
Sapwolf on July 13, 2009 at 3:55 PM
Nothing like a 733K in 5 months number to get the trolls out. You people are just going to have to wise up, get over it, and realize, running in 2012 or not she is a major player in the conservative movement.
And I’m getting sick of all you idiots who keep saying “she lost your vote” when she made that resignation speech. I have yet to see any of you explain to me what exactly in that speech was so bad and incoherent. It made perfect sense to me and I understood every word of it. And BTW, it was from the heart and she hardly had any notes, unlike your dear Messiah, who can barely speak off prompter.
davek70 on July 13, 2009 at 3:55 PM
Exactly. Voting third party is a wasted vote, usually, and so 60% is quite a lot. But then, HA has a high percentage of Palin fans.
Phoenician on July 13, 2009 at 3:56 PM
I don’t think any of the issues, whether abortion, immigration, etc., really require some huge nuanced position.
Just come on out and really state what you really think. It’s OK.
AnninCA on July 13, 2009 at 3:56 PM
I would vote for a third party candidate. I would not vote Palin though unless she really impressed me on a continuous basis.
Dash on July 13, 2009 at 3:56 PM
Hey morons, a third-party run by Palin (and you voting for her) means Obama gets reelected in 2012.
Unbelievable. I thought there were more intelligent people on this blog. 448 of you are proving me wrong.
nickj116 on July 13, 2009 at 3:56 PM
portlandon on July 13, 2009 at 3:55 PM
Yep. Would’ve been my vote, but since that wasn’t an option went with Palin 3rd party.
I suspect your poll would have looked very different if you included this option (Palin GOP), AP.
cs89 on July 13, 2009 at 3:56 PM
I completely disagree.
SouthernGent on July 13, 2009 at 3:57 PM
Not aiming or thinking high enough, if Sarah starts a real Conservative party and it ignites, the GOP could be done.
Speakup on July 13, 2009 at 3:57 PM
No you didn’t.
If you knew her, you’d understand.
Study up and come back.
Sapwolf on July 13, 2009 at 3:58 PM
I agree–at the national level, Perot proved that 3rd party candidates present a lose-lose opportunity. It won’t be until a viable third party takes several seats in the house and a few in the Senate that it makes sense to run at the presidential level. Until that day comes, let’s support Sarah doing serious damage to statist liberal agendas then nominate her as the (R) candidate.
ted c on July 13, 2009 at 3:58 PM
Michelle Malkin
Laura Ingraham
Tammy Bruce
Virginia Fox (R, NC)
Michelle Bachman (already mentioned)
SouthernGent on July 13, 2009 at 3:58 PM
I personally think her remark about supporting even Dems or Independents and sharing that her son is Independent was a clear net thrown out to a bigger base.
We ARE all terribly sick of partisanship.
She is so not the typical GOP candidate.
Thank god.
They are toast.
AnninCA on July 13, 2009 at 3:58 PM
I still think Clinton is going to run against Obama in 2012 for the Dem nomination. When his poll numbers tank…she will take full advantage and could win the nomination.
RR
ramrants on July 13, 2009 at 3:58 PM
As much as I would like Palin to run under a “conservative” “common sense” banner, I’m afraid all a 3rd party will do is pull conservative votes from the moderate Republican candidate and allow another 4 years of BO. I don’t think I can take another 4 years of the “divider” president.
jbh45 on July 13, 2009 at 3:58 PM
Fred had probably the support of 90% of the commenters on here and couldn’t even get past the first few Republican primaries.
amerpundit on July 13, 2009 at 3:58 PM
Yes.. but they aren’t called Pikas.
upinak on July 13, 2009 at 3:59 PM
So what I’m supposed to do is wait for the GOP to pick some “moderate” RINO who will knife me just a bit slower than a demorat would, all the while whispering in my ear that the blade will miss my vital organs, honest.
Yeah, great. Every election year I get presented with worse offerings than the last, and I’m told that once the GOP gets full control everything will be put right again.
Bishop on July 13, 2009 at 3:59 PM
Maybe, just maybe if AP had put up an option like..say…Palin as the GOP nominee, there wouldn’t be 448 votes for third party.
Thunderstorm129 on July 13, 2009 at 3:59 PM
A third party is a wonderful idea in the mind.
Politically, however, it would create a battleground twixt it and the GOP, resulting in even a low-trusted Democrat windfall. We might as well eat a bullet right now if we try to do that, unless you have some concrete evidence that not only would we drain the GOP of its supporters, but we’ll also siphon off the Blue Dogs.
MadisonConservative on July 13, 2009 at 3:59 PM
hat tip to you dude–I failed to mention these fine ladies. I have no idea who Bruce and Fox are.
ted c on July 13, 2009 at 3:59 PM
She is gonna win the GOP nomination if she runs. She is smart and will not split the GOP. She will strengthen the conservative movement within the GOP.
Sapwolf on July 13, 2009 at 3:59 PM
He also left out “Allahpundit as GOP nominee”, but not because he forgot.
Hollowpoint on July 13, 2009 at 3:59 PM
If that was a option; Romney’s vote totals would be in single digits territory.
Norwegian on July 13, 2009 at 4:00 PM
Go Sarah!
Green Muse on July 13, 2009 at 4:00 PM
Meanwhile, back in the real world, McCain supported Palin on Meet the Press.
I note this is not a thread here. *haha
AnninCA on July 13, 2009 at 4:00 PM
Do you dispute the two parties have ruined this country?
artist on July 13, 2009 at 3:47 PM
Yes, I dispute that. But I also dispute the premise that this country is ruined.
anuts on July 13, 2009 at 3:50 PM
Ok.
Soldier on.
artist on July 13, 2009 at 4:00 PM
dude-when voting, we’re always voting for the lesser of two evils.
Government is at the very least, a necessary evil, and at it’s worst, an intolerable one.
ted c on July 13, 2009 at 4:00 PM
Basically what that poll shows is that many of you would rather lose in 2012 than vote for Mitt Romney.
The utter idiocy, as well as arrogance, of that is astounding.
nickj116 on July 13, 2009 at 4:00 PM
So…. Scenario…
Palin runs as a third party candidate, and is running in the 30% range…
GOP candidate running in the 20% range…
Would all of you die hard GOP folks advocate the GOP’r throwing his support to Palin, to keep obama out of office… as you have TIME AND TIME Again forced us Fiscal Con types to do?
Romeo13 on July 13, 2009 at 4:01 PM
But then, that wouldn’t tell us how she’d fair if she were running third party. See?
The point is, if Palin runs third party, would you abandon the GOP and go for her, or would you still stick with the GOP? If he included her as a possible GOP candidate, we wouldn’t be able to tell how many would abandon the GOP just to vote for her instead.
That would be a good poll, but it should be a separate one.
Esthier on July 13, 2009 at 4:01 PM
Which 9 trolls voted for Teh Won on that poll lol?
bwahahaha!
bluelightbrigade on July 13, 2009 at 4:01 PM
I’m voting for Obama in this poll because it is BS.
Take that!
Joe Caps on July 13, 2009 at 4:01 PM
What are they called?
Mini-Marmots?
Alaskan Grays?
Sapwolf on July 13, 2009 at 4:01 PM
New AP Headline:
Poll shows overwhelming support of HA readers for Palin to as 3rd party candidate.
Thunderstorm129 on July 13, 2009 at 4:01 PM
Mitt Romney- as a dedicated RINO- is a vote wasted every bit as much as a third party vote.
Sarah’s best use would be to build up the Tea Party effort to impact the 2010 elections. If she does that and voter disgust actually rolls out enough Dems and RINOs, the clout that would give her would trump the Romney money machine.
michaelo on July 13, 2009 at 4:01 PM
I don’t think she would run as a third party candidate unless something like this happens:
She loses the Republican primaries due to crossover Democrats voting for a candidate they think will lose the general election. Sarah finishes out of the money in the primaries but polls a majority of Republican support. So Democrats cross over, vote for someone like Ron Paul or Tancredo or Huckabee who wouldn’t stand a chance in the general election in order to sabotage the Republican nomination … Sarah Palin polls higher among Republicans and Independents than the Republican candidate … then she makes an “independent” run for the White House and stands a chance of winning.
If the Republican parties of the various states go closed primary and she loses, then I believe she is looking at a VP slot on a ticket.
crosspatch on July 13, 2009 at 4:01 PM
Yeah because if there’s something we learned from last primary, it’s that McCain’s fundraising machine is what put him over the edge.
LevStrauss on July 13, 2009 at 4:02 PM
Perot proved that 3rd party candidates present a lose-lose opportunity. It won’t be until a viable third party takes several seats in the house and a few in the Senate that it makes sense to run at the presidential level. Until that day comes, let’s support Sarah doing serious damage to statist liberal agendas then nominate her as the (R) candidate.
ted c on July 13, 2009 at 4:02 PM
I can only assume that he got lots of Palin material from Meagan Mac during break time from other activities during their weel long romantic get away.
Joe Bloggs on July 13, 2009 at 4:02 PM
And if that happens, we lose in 2012 because Independents make or break elections, and they loathe Palin.
But go ahead, vote for her. Let Obama have four more years.
Makes total sense.
nickj116 on July 13, 2009 at 4:02 PM
Excellent point.
Sapwolf on July 13, 2009 at 4:02 PM
America has a third-party in office right now…Marxists! It is going to take some very strong people to clean this mess up. What about a Palin/Romney – Romney/Palin third-party ticket? We’ll need 16 years to repair our country so we need ALL the votes we can get!
redwhiteblue on July 13, 2009 at 4:02 PM
I was curious to see how she’d fare as a third-party candidate. There’ll be umpteen nomination polls before 2012. Relax.
Allahpundit on July 13, 2009 at 4:02 PM
Has to be voting machine malfunction.
betsyz on July 13, 2009 at 4:02 PM
Bad poll – many people wouldn’t support a third party – even if Palin was the candidate.
katiejane on July 13, 2009 at 4:03 PM
The republicans are still wussies. One, drop the announcement that you are going to vote for her no matter what. Two, there is nothing wrong (in the view of sane people) respectfully asking questions even if they hurt her nomination. In fact, that is exactly what they should be doing and challenging the hypocrisy of the donks and their behavior at these hearings.
Blake on July 13, 2009 at 4:03 PM
Inspired by Thomas Paine’s wake-up call to Americans.
None of which Beck supports. Again, Beck’s book was inspired by Thomas Paine’s work. He (Beck) is telling people to wake up and realize what’s going on with Democrats AND Republicans.
VibrioCocci on July 13, 2009 at 4:03 PM
If primary voters consisted only Hot Air readers, then yes- she’d win.
But that’s not the case.
Hollowpoint on July 13, 2009 at 4:03 PM
Is Sara Quitter a real conservative?
We know that she’s pro-life and pro-gun but what about fiscal conservatism, she was for the bridge to nowhere before she was against it. On foreign policy, she doesn’t know anything about the middle east, she knows nothing about Latin America or Europe or Africa or even Mexico and Honduras.
Falz on July 13, 2009 at 4:03 PM
Are the New Black Panthers in here?
ted c on July 13, 2009 at 4:03 PM
Most people call them highland ground squirrels. I would trap for them, but I don’t want to trudge up a mountain to set my snares… as storms blow in fast and I can lose my snares.
upinak on July 13, 2009 at 4:03 PM
Does anyone know what Huck’s PAC has raised? That would me a more interesting comparison, since he is also raising money at the grassroots level. Mitt’s numbers are impressive, but considering his are mostly big donors, I would have expected a larger total for his PAC.
Now, compare Sarah and Mike and we’d be able to get a better feel as to whom the grassroots are supporting.
yogi41 on July 13, 2009 at 4:04 PM
Rush Limbaugh has a tin ear (pun barely intended) for politics. He pretty much always thinks that candidates who agree with him will win (anyone remember him predicting a Bush victory in ’92?), all polling evidence to the contrary.
A third-party Palin run would be awesome for the Democrats. I mean, really, really awesome.
YYZ on July 13, 2009 at 4:04 PM
I like Mitt, but he does have a perception problem. Mitt has a brilliant mind when it comes to the economy and foreign policy, but he will be painted by the Obama campaign as an old rich white man (younger version of McCain). He lacks that quality of being able to interact with the Joe Sixpacks of this country. For the MITTens here, what is his plan to reach out to women and minorities? Although Sarah does have her faults (and trust me, we all know she has them), those are things that can be overcome. How can Mitt, an ivory tower-ish corporate wizard, beat the community organizer in chief? What would be his approach?
Dr.Cwac.Cwac on July 13, 2009 at 4:04 PM
I think it’s time for a revolution.
I think that’s what the tea-parties, in spite of the GOP, in fact, sometimes, in rebellion of the GOP, has been about.
This is about insiders.
I’m a huge pro-public option on healthcare. Even with both bhe house and the senate and the presidency, am I able to win?
Nope.
I don’t think etiher party now represents real people.
It’s so distorted, it is beyond whatever.
AnninCA on July 13, 2009 at 4:04 PM
You can’t tell that any way. It’s a bogus poll.
The question (if you’re right about his intentions) should be:
Would you abandon the GOP to support Palin as a 3rd party candidate?
Yes/No.
There you go. Drop the Mitt crap. Drop the Obama crap.
Thunderstorm129 on July 13, 2009 at 4:04 PM
nickj116 on July 13, 2009 at 4:00 PM
As myself and others have noted, the most likely route to voting for Palin (as GOP nominee) wasn’t in the poll, so I at least voted with that likelihood in mind.
No-win situation was presented by AP: Vote GOP, and face headlines of “Romney outpolls Palin!!!! Eleventy!!!” in a future post, or give AP his “Third Party” vote.
(Come on, if Romney got 50.0000002%, you know that would be the headline.)
cs89 on July 13, 2009 at 4:04 PM
Gentlemen can agree to disagree. But on a site so heavily weighted to conservatives, if she cannot break over 80%, how is she supposed to attract enough independent voters to put her over the top?
Fact is – like it or not – that she is a hugely divisive figure, who lacks the knowledge, skills and discipline to counter-act her deficit among independents.
Before McCain even knew who she was, I told one of his fund-raisers that I would never vote for him, let alone contribute to him, unless Palin was on his ticket.
My wife and I gave the maximum the day she was added to the ticket, but….
Having now seen how divisive and, yes, uninformed she is, the bloom is off the rose, as far as I am concerned.
guntotinglibertarian on July 13, 2009 at 4:04 PM
I don’t believe in third parties because they just don’t work. However, I voted for Palin third party as a protest voted since the other two choices were unacceptable.
Blake on July 13, 2009 at 4:05 PM
OK, but in an alternate reality where Palin bucks the establishment and goes third party, can she count on your vote or would you rather go GOP?
Esthier on July 13, 2009 at 4:05 PM
Yeah, and Fred really had the fire and charisma Palin has… give me a break.
davek70 on July 13, 2009 at 4:05 PM
Personally I would like to see 3 or more candidates on an initial ballot followed by runoffs. Too often it seems like voters are voting against someone as opposed to voting for someone.
The 2 party system sucks.
Guardian on July 13, 2009 at 4:05 PM
Romeo13 on July 13, 2009 at 3:54 PM
This is what I’m talking about. What is the GOP? In times past there used to be platforms made up of planks. The GOP turned it’s platform into a gallows for it’s dissenters, as did the dems.
aceinstall on July 13, 2009 at 4:05 PM
The lesser evil is converging with the greater evil, the two parties are looking awfully similar these days; why should I waste a vote on either when both are trying to kill me?
The GOP needs to find a real conservative to run, not some RINO jackalope who wants to aisle-jump so the press will massage his ego.
Bishop on July 13, 2009 at 4:06 PM
Here’s some more perspective from Meg Stapleton about Sarah’s PAC:
Meghan Stapleton, a spokeswoman for Palin’s PAC, said, “It was a great first half. Just to put it in perspective, we did it with one event and one e-mail from the governor back in February.”
Stapleton noted that SarahPAC was actually “dark,” meaning it took in no money, from a period in mid-April until early June as Palin focused on raising money for her legal-defense fund instead. Palin has been hit with a series of ethics complaints since last year, allegations which she cited in her July 3 press conference announcing her resignation.
yogi41 on July 13, 2009 at 4:06 PM
Exactly. Voting third party is a wasted vote, usually, and so 60% is quite a lot. But then, HA has a high percentage of Palin fans.
Phoenician on July 13, 2009 at 3:56 PM
DAMN, am I sick of hearing this. That attitude steams me.
Using this logic, voting republican in a blue state is a wasted vote, and voting democrat in a red state is a wasted vote.
I don’t buy it. I vote for whom I support.
Why? Because it DOES matter. My conscience matters. And so does every other person’s out there who votes against the grain.
connertown on July 13, 2009 at 4:06 PM
Don’t forget Marsha Blackburn from TN. She is hardcore conservative. I adore that lady!!!
squeek71 on July 13, 2009 at 4:06 PM
Thanks to portlandon for the link to the article showing that Palin did indeed out raise Romney while doing very little active fundraising the first half of this year. Perhaps the Hot Air post could be corrected to reflect that information for clarification purposes?
I also found the last paragraph from that article interesting.
In my very humble opinion, the first shows loyalty to her former teammate and the second shows that Gov. Palin is not at ALL thinking of running for Senator. Which I feel is a very Good Thing. Sen. Murkowski’s response, on the other hand, does not reflect well on the senator. :P
Kirin on July 13, 2009 at 4:06 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 … 10 Next »