SarahPAC raises $733,000 in first six months of 2009; Update: Rush wonders about third-party run
posted at 3:30 pm on July 13, 2009 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Actually, that’s only a five-month total since the PAC wasn’t up and running until the end of January. By comparison, Romney’s PAC raised $1.4 million through the end of May, but then fundraising is pretty much Mitt’s full-time gig these days and he already has a polished team around him left over from the primaries. Let’s see what happens in the second half when he and Palin go toe-to-toe.
The most intriguing detail from Politico’s report:
The majority of the money raised by SarahPAC so far has come in the form of “unitemized contributions,” meaning donations of less than $200 each. PACS are not required to name those small donors in their filings with the FEC. The remaining money came through more than 700 different $200-plus contributions made by donors from all around the United States.
According to its FEC records, SarahPAC’s biggest expenditure during the reporting period was the more than $103,000 it spent on EDonation.com, a Virginia-based firm that specializes in online fundraising.
Not surprisingly, it sounds like she’s going to follow The One’s lead and turn her support among the base into a cash machine via small donations. In fact, one of the co-founders of Team Sarah has an op-ed in the Examiner today urging her to do exactly that. The only problem: Obama didn’t raise most of his money that way. In fact, percentage-wise, he raised less from contributions under $200 than Bush and Kerry did in 2004. What made him a fundraising juggernaut capable of taking down the Clinton machine was the small money he raised combined with his ability to peel off big donors and big party names from Billary. If Palin runs a true outsider campaign in 2012 and tries to win on the strength of the base alone, she risks being overwhelmed by Romney vacuuming up the big money from party chieftains. Which is to say, even an outsider needs “insiders.” Help her, Fred Malek, you’re her only hope!
Exit question: I’m told Glenn Beck was yelling about a third-party on the radio this morning, a subject that’s been on my mind lately. So choose, bearing in mind that a split conservative vote greatly benefits The One. See, e.g., Clinton’s two victories.
Update: He knows third parties are sure losers but the thought of a “true conservative” faction clearly has him intrigued.
When I watched her speech, when she announced that she was leaving the governorship of Alaska, I didn’t hear the word Republican mentioned once. If I’m Sarah Palin and I’m conservative — Republican Party’s been just as mean-spirited to her as the Democrats have. A lot of them have, a lot of Republican media, a lot of the so-called conservative media have been. I don’t know if she’s going to campaign for conservative Democrats but if she believes that conservatism is the way to go. The one thing that does slightly worry me about this is this whole third party business. Yeah, it’s remote but it’s still a possibility out there and there are a lot of people pushing a third party and that’s — Third parties, they lose, they just lose. Third parties never end up with a congressional or Senate candidates. It’s just not the way to go. We’ll save that for later if that actually begins to transpire, we see it beginning to transpire.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 3 ... 10 Next »
From a strictly long term perspective, I would like to see Palin start a third party.
Guardian on July 13, 2009 at 3:34 PM
the Bull Moose party
ChunkyLover on July 13, 2009 at 3:34 PM
Bwahaha! I remember all of the claims around here that she’d blow us away with the many millions her PAC probably raised, with the average American simply clamoring to send money her way. If only I could dig up those comments.
amerpundit on July 13, 2009 at 3:34 PM
Romney=Socialized medicine.
artist on July 13, 2009 at 3:34 PM
Palin with 20 of 27 votes so far.
Anti-Palin cultists, take note.
tsj017 on July 13, 2009 at 3:34 PM
That doesn’t seem like a lot of money.
Ted Torgerson on July 13, 2009 at 3:36 PM
amerpundit on July 13, 2009 at 3:34 PM
“Let’s see what happens in the second half when he and Palin go toe-to-toe.”
Your laugh is premature.
artist on July 13, 2009 at 3:36 PM
Haven’t you heard? The average Joe and Jane Citizen is tired of the “elites” in Washington and would love to make her president. Unfortunately, that RINO McCain got in the way in 2008, otherwise she’d be president now!!!1!
amerpundit on July 13, 2009 at 3:36 PM
Thank you AP…
El_Terrible on July 13, 2009 at 3:36 PM
It’s not a bad amount, she hasn’t been trying to push it.
Firebird on July 13, 2009 at 3:36 PM
GOOO CUDA!!!!
wth kind of poll is that….
alexraye on July 13, 2009 at 3:37 PM
3rd parties are always a bust. She needs to win the Republican nomination or we hand America over for a total of 8 years to the looters.
Mojave Mark on July 13, 2009 at 3:37 PM
There’s zero chance Palin’s running a third-party candidacy.
AP, I’m somewhat glad you’re back, but stop causing trouble.
Robert_Paulson on July 13, 2009 at 3:37 PM
Palin raising the money from solely grassroots contributions and without making fundraisers is amazing.
Now that she is free from Alaska, she’ll raise so much money!
jencab on July 13, 2009 at 3:37 PM
No, really it isn’t. I was told countless times that we’d be blown away when the report for her fundraising numbers came out. You don’t insist people are going to be blown away by the first report and then insist people are being premature when they look towards the first report when it comes out.
amerpundit on July 13, 2009 at 3:37 PM
I am of the opinion that somebody who abandons her elected post, in the middle of her term, has forfeited any further confidence in the minds of the voters.
It reminds me of an adulterer. Once it happens, how in the world can his/her spouse expect it not to happen again? There will always be the uncertainty.
And I liked the Cuda.
OhEssYouCowboys on July 13, 2009 at 3:38 PM
I don’t believe 3rd parties work. Palin to retake the GOP.
El_Terrible on July 13, 2009 at 3:38 PM
a conservative third party in ‘12 seems like it would guarantee 4 more year of obamanation.
is that really what we want?
homesickamerican on July 13, 2009 at 3:38 PM
I refuse to succumb to the third-Party temptation. However, I would rather have Palin over Romney. Guess I can’t vote in this poll.
anuts on July 13, 2009 at 3:38 PM
Expect the DOJ to assign a full-time team to investigate every single donation for legality.
Bishop on July 13, 2009 at 3:38 PM
the Bull Moose party
ChunkyLover on July 13, 2009 at 3:34 PM
Sounds good.She won’t be beholding to the GOP that way.
Gongress would not want to go against her either. She would eat them alive!!!
Rick007 on July 13, 2009 at 3:38 PM
Why the hell would we want a third party? We’ve got enough trouble fighting the Democrats (and their criminal affiliates) with the one party. Splitting the votes would guarantee a big loss in 2012. After that weird resignation, I’m through with Palin. She was all right, but I can’t imagine her being able to win now. Romney gets my vote, easily.
Sign of the Dollar on July 13, 2009 at 3:38 PM
AP:
GB was implying the formation of a third party by roundly suggesting the current two party system “isn’t working” or is “broken.”
Sarah Palin would be wise to a) remain unresponsive to media attacks and b) maneuver and fire like armored cavalry at statist liberal positions on DEBT and ENERGY.
I am eager to see the leaders who emerge in the wake of the destruction she can wreak upon these agendas. There was a piece at American Thinker today suggesting an ambitious attack agenda. I disagree, her efforts should be extraordinarily focused (ie, the center of gravity concept via USMIL operations) upon targets most likely to be both vulnerable and lead to tactical, operational and strategic damage.
ted c on July 13, 2009 at 3:38 PM
No option for Palin as GOP nominee?
Thunderstorm129 on July 13, 2009 at 3:38 PM
Romney has Compassionate Conservative written all over him, emphasis on compassionate. I’ll keep my money and handle the compassion myself, thanks.
Rocks on July 13, 2009 at 3:38 PM
I’m all for Palin. I have never been so angry at the state of the economy and at the total apathy of Republicans. Honestly, Palin not only gets my vote and my cash, if she sets these g d elites on their collective ass I could not be more thrilled.
This country is being destroyed and there are not many people with the balls to talk about it. Right now the only two seem to be Palin and Liz Cheney.
ORconservative on July 13, 2009 at 3:39 PM
Third party for me, Palin at the top of the ticket just makes it sweeter. I’m with Guardian on this, even if it’s not instant success, it’s time.
aceinstall on July 13, 2009 at 3:39 PM
I think all 3rd party attempts will fail ultimately, barring a revolution and our system being setup all over again.
the Left sycophants are much less likely to leave the Tribe than those that would otherwise vote GOP but like to think of them selves as Indpendent/individualist.
The Left are collectivist and know how to play a Team Sport much better
jp on July 13, 2009 at 3:39 PM
Is this your first post after returning from vacation?
d1carter on July 13, 2009 at 3:39 PM
Am I naive for wondering about a Palin/Romney third-party ticket?
redwhiteblue on July 13, 2009 at 3:39 PM
AP, pleaase check those Mitt figures, I believe the 1.4M is SINCE he started his PAC last year. This year, he has only raised 400k or so.
davek70 on July 13, 2009 at 3:40 PM
You don’t insist people are going to be blown away by the first report and then insist people are being premature when they look towards the first report when it comes out.
amerpundit on July 13, 2009 at 3:37 PM
You must be confusing me with someone else.
Maybe you can dig up some quotes.
artist on July 13, 2009 at 3:40 PM
Having give the maximum to
McCain/Palin, I am sad to say that I just don’t see myself investing in her again.guntotinglibertarian on July 13, 2009 at 3:40 PM
HEY AWESOME! Welcome back AP!
ThackerAgency on July 13, 2009 at 3:41 PM
Ross PerotRalph NaderSarah Palin 2012!amerpundit on July 13, 2009 at 3:41 PM
Not really.
reaganaut on July 13, 2009 at 3:41 PM
I don’t believe 3rd parties work. Palin to retake the GOP.
El_Terrible on July 13, 2009 at 3:38 PM
The other 2 parties don’t work either.
artist on July 13, 2009 at 3:41 PM
The last thing we need is a third party to divide conservative votes when we would finally have a chance to boot the Obamessiah out. This communistic trainwreck of a presidency has to be stopped. A third party will not win, but it sure could hand the presidency to Obama again. We need to make sure a good conservative republican candidate gets the nomination and support him/her full force. I can’t take four more years of The One. Oh my. This is bad news IMO.
squeek71 on July 13, 2009 at 3:41 PM
According to another site:
Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney’s PAC, Free and Strong America PAC, reported $404,000 raised in the first six months of this year for a total of $1.4 million raised.
So Palin’s 700K plus looks pretty good for someone who has done no active fundraising.
katiejane on July 13, 2009 at 3:41 PM
I sense no hate for Palin in this posting. Therefore it must be everywhere and nowhere; such is the mighty power of the evil, malicious, subversive Allahpundit. Let all the AP haters rush in to condemn him for his ceaseless trashing of our only hope.
JimRich on July 13, 2009 at 3:41 PM
ultimately, Palin may be taking this angle to send a loud and clear message to the Peggy Noonan and David Frum’s of the world. Which basically says: “Hey, I’m the Alpha here, get in line or get destroyed….you idiots”
jp on July 13, 2009 at 3:41 PM
Remember that she also raised around $250Kk for her legal defense fund; add that to the total, and she’s closer to $1 million raised for her in a 5-month time frame.
yogi41 on July 13, 2009 at 3:42 PM
I was laughing at the people who insisted that we’d be blown away by the first numbers. You then responded to that post. If you didn’t insist we’d be blown away by the original numbers, then I wasn’t referring to you.
amerpundit on July 13, 2009 at 3:42 PM
Not really.
reaganaut on July 13, 2009 at 3:41 PM
Ok…
artist on July 13, 2009 at 3:42 PM
McCain was the insider of insiders.
Weight of Glory on July 13, 2009 at 3:43 PM
I’m one of ‘em. :-D
SouthernGent on July 13, 2009 at 3:43 PM
The Beaver Party. And for those with dirty minds, I mean the aquatic rodent.
Daggett on July 13, 2009 at 3:43 PM
At least they haven’t been working for the people that hired them.
thomasaur on July 13, 2009 at 3:43 PM
I’d love to see the reaction to a 3rd party run by “Sarah!” It’d be defended as the greatest move ever, conservative blogs would crash from the comment wars, and then she’d get clobbered worse than Perot and guarantee an Obama landslide.
brak on July 13, 2009 at 3:43 PM
I didn’t vote for Perot but I can’t help but get the feeling that if he wasn’t such a wierdo things would have been much closer. You can knock Palin all you want but it’s hard to say she’s a wierdo. She didn’t resign claiming agents were after her kids.
Rocks on July 13, 2009 at 3:43 PM
muskrat… the official Alaskan rodent.
upinak on July 13, 2009 at 3:44 PM
They just are the only ones with a greater than zero chance of winning national elections.
anuts on July 13, 2009 at 3:44 PM
It’s looking more and more like 2012 is going to be a really weird election.
exception on July 13, 2009 at 3:44 PM
Got to wonder what Cheney’s thoughts were on this, given she talked to him before she resigned and all
jp on July 13, 2009 at 3:44 PM
Correct. And it is often promoted by those who wish to do harm – not help.
Blake on July 13, 2009 at 3:44 PM
Can Sarah legally place her book advance funds into her pac?
Ris4victory on July 13, 2009 at 3:44 PM
Palin is the first politician I’ve encountered who would tempt me to vote third party.
Y-not on July 13, 2009 at 3:45 PM
Yeah, great idea. Let’s make a female candidate as the nominee of The Beaver Party. How could that possibly backfire? :-)
amerpundit on July 13, 2009 at 3:45 PM
P.S. Throw in Liz Cheney too
aceinstall on July 13, 2009 at 3:45 PM
After the way she has been treated by the Republican insiders, I couldn’t blame her.
I would vote for Sarah third party before I would vote for anyone pushed by the current Republican leadership.
Did that once with McCain, I’m still trying to get the stink off of my hands.
MarkTheGreat on July 13, 2009 at 3:45 PM
A third party? This would be Obama’s dream come true.
patrick neid on July 13, 2009 at 3:45 PM
Third party doesn’t stand a chance. We need to stand our ground and shout our beliefs and their benefits vs Dem’s.
marklmail on July 13, 2009 at 3:45 PM
OMG…she’s at 60% at the time of this posting!
SouthernGent on July 13, 2009 at 3:45 PM
On the 3rd Party thing, you’ve got to get away from thinking in static categories – that goes for Rush as well as everyone else.
Presuming that Obama and especially the Pelosi Dems are on the way down in 2010 and 2012, or at least very highly vulnerable- as I keep on saying, the only scenarios under which near-term election discussion means very much – then a situation in which an outsider Palinist movement forces individual Reps or Dems, or both parties, to commit to or ty to co-opt a Palinist platform, with said Palnist movement always threatening to discipline and punish divergence, then Palin may make a tremendous contribution to our political life, regardless of whether its through a conventional candidacy, a threatened 3rd party, an actual 3rd party, or a 3rd party brought back into the 2-party fold.
And that just scratches the surface.
CK MacLeod on July 13, 2009 at 3:45 PM
one thing I’ll say, if it was
Romney
Palin
Obama
Romney definitely comes in 3rd place, the Christian Vote would defintely go to Palin. Now of the GOP nominated Huckabee instead in this scenario then the outcome would be a wash at best.
jp on July 13, 2009 at 3:46 PM
I don’t know if some sort of 3rd party is viable, but I am damm sick and tired of holding my nose when I vote.
Bishop on July 13, 2009 at 3:46 PM
A strong third party on the right only serves to guarantee a Dem win. The Republican party isn’t unsalvageable, it just needs some strong and effective leadership- not the scared, capitulating style we have now.
Hollowpoint on July 13, 2009 at 3:46 PM
It ain’t over till it’s over and it depends on one’s time horizon.
Joe Bloggs on July 13, 2009 at 3:46 PM
They just are the only ones with a greater than zero chance of winning national elections.
anuts on July 13, 2009 at 3:44 PM
I don’t dispute that.
Do you dispute the two parties have ruined this country?
artist on July 13, 2009 at 3:47 PM
Sarah won her governship with virtually no money.
Turn out that at the end of the day its the VOTE that counts.
Amadeus on July 13, 2009 at 3:47 PM
Where is the none of the above option?
txag92 on July 13, 2009 at 3:47 PM
I wonder if the Conservative wing of the GOP is serious about starting a new party, since the GOP is under attack from RINO’s all stripes.
jp on July 13, 2009 at 3:47 PM
In the Hot Air poll? I’m not surprised. It’s the same crowd that overwhelmingly supported Fred Thompson. Not that there’s anything particularly wrong with Fred, just that it’s far from representative of even a sizable portion of the electorate.
amerpundit on July 13, 2009 at 3:47 PM
What third party? There’s only one republicrat party now.
Fletch54 on July 13, 2009 at 3:47 PM
Glenn Beck’s fill-in last week kicked around a third-party name: the Common Sense Party
VibrioCocci on July 13, 2009 at 3:47 PM
Very true. Good insight.
Weight of Glory on July 13, 2009 at 3:47 PM
We’d need a 3rd party Nader style to run against Obama for continuing Bush’s National Security stuff and lying to them to peel off atleast 10% of his voters too I think
jp on July 13, 2009 at 3:48 PM
My vote would go to Palin. From everything I saw during the election, she was the only one who seemed to talk any sense. I mean yeah, she fumbled a little, but compared to the other three idiots she was pretty much always spot on.
roopster217 on July 13, 2009 at 3:48 PM
Seems like Sarah is doing just fine without the “polished” fundraising team of Mittens.
Once Sarah is free to fundraise to her own; think a $1,000/plate fundraising dinner anywhere in a red state will not be sold out? She will outraise Mittens and the Huckster by a magnitude of 100:1.
Norwegian on July 13, 2009 at 3:48 PM
Compared to the fake voters of Acorn?
Hmmm
upinak on July 13, 2009 at 3:48 PM
Now we know why the Beltway Boys have been knifing Palin in the back, daily. She’s taking “their” money and “their” voters. Too dam* bad for them. She will get my dough and votes; and nothing for the Whigs.
james23 on July 13, 2009 at 3:48 PM
Actually this post isn’t totally honest in its comparison between Mitt and Sarah. It gives the impression that Mitt’s 1.4 million is over the same time period. As Katiejane points out Sarah’s total is greater for the six months.
Rose on July 13, 2009 at 3:48 PM
She didn’t advertise or do fundraisers except for one e-mail letter on June 28th.
She will not split the conservative vote because Romney is not a conservative. She will get 90% of the conservative vote.
If you add in her Alaska Fund Trust, she actually did better than Hillary and Obama in 2005.
She has arrived.
Also, Romney only raised $404k during the first six months so Sarah spanked him silly without even tryin.
People,
The train is starting to pull out of the station. The only question is whether AP and his moderate Frummies will get on board or support Obama in the event Sarah meets Mitt in the 2012 primary. No idea if she’ll run but she is national to stay.
Sapwolf on July 13, 2009 at 3:49 PM
Also- why so much focus on Romney as if he’s the only game in town? It’s too early to even know who’ll be running.
I’d like to see some candidates that aren’t retreads from the last election.
Hollowpoint on July 13, 2009 at 3:49 PM
If she can only get 60% on a HA poll, she is dead in the water.
guntotinglibertarian on July 13, 2009 at 3:49 PM
Third party runs brought us Woodrow Wilson and BJ Clinton. I’d rather SP work inside the GOP.
Lou Budvis on July 13, 2009 at 3:49 PM
God would not have given you a nose if he didn’t want you to be able to smell smelly politicians. When in doubt, go with your nose. The nose, knows.
Joe Bloggs on July 13, 2009 at 3:49 PM
Sounds like someone’s trying to primp up Romney by pushing out that 1.4 million figure.
If he only raised 400k in six months–actively fundraising and doing the speaking circuit, and she’s raised 700k doing nothing… he has a problem.
Enoxo on July 13, 2009 at 3:50 PM
I’ve felt like a Conservative without a Party, ever since H.W. Bush.
I would join it, should it become available. And if I felt like it had the potential to endure.
OhEssYouCowboys on July 13, 2009 at 3:50 PM
There were 6 votes cast for Bozo. Anyone want to own up to that?
txag92 on July 13, 2009 at 3:50 PM
Sarah Palin….
Liz Cheney….
the future of the conservative movement lies in the heart and hands of a conservative woman. A woman who is raising her children, who has a husband who loves her.
I see the future, and she’s wearing toe peepers….
ted c on July 13, 2009 at 3:50 PM
The only party that has any chance in the near future is the one untroubled by any pretensions towards honesty or truth. Pure, unadulterated pragmatism is our future. The Democrats are there already, and the Republicans are not far behind.
A third party would be an interesting diversion but little more than that.
spmat on July 13, 2009 at 3:50 PM
Those are very good numbers for someone who hasn’t been a full time fundraiser.
Laugh all you want, it makes you look sillier.
MarkTheGreat on July 13, 2009 at 3:50 PM
i don’t think Romney is electable, evangelicals will have a hard time voting for him.
jp on July 13, 2009 at 3:50 PM
Yes, I dispute that. But I also dispute the premise that this country is ruined.
anuts on July 13, 2009 at 3:50 PM
Had to be some Longhorns and Sooners.
:OP
OhEssYouCowboys on July 13, 2009 at 3:51 PM
So glad you’re back Allah, we didn’t have nearly enough Palin posts while you were gone.
kg598301 on July 13, 2009 at 3:51 PM
We have to remember Sarah does not follow the scripted, conventional, and calculated norms we are used to. I don’t think she ever said she was going third party, but if she did I think she would surprise all of us. Now a question. How come a small donation to a Pac. generates so much e-mail, phone calls and unsoliceted spam mail? That is enough to think twice about donating to anybody.
fourdeucer on July 13, 2009 at 3:51 PM
Maybe Palin could form a 3rd party of potential voters, a sort of interest group that could be mustered to vote overwhelmingly for a particular candidate.
The GOP forwards some RINO for nominee consideration and the SarahPAC members could give them the finger, remind the GOP that if they want to get power back, they need to find a real conservative. I’d put my name on that list.
Bishop on July 13, 2009 at 3:51 PM
Third party? I don’t see that… but I could see it if she went for a Fiscal Conservative bent (allowing bigger issues like abortion and gay marriage to the states… I’m all for that although personally I oppose both).
Kind of a Goldwater approach perhaps, but who said he was a total failure? The same kind that wrote off Reagan for good.
Chaz706 on July 13, 2009 at 3:51 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 3 ... 10 Next »