<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video: GOP had a plan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/11/video-gop-had-a-plan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/11/video-gop-had-a-plan/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 06:21:31 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Soma online sales.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/11/video-gop-had-a-plan/comment-page-2/#comment-2508828</link>
		<dc:creator>Soma online sales.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 22:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=58598#comment-2508828</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Soma online soma buy soma online....&lt;/strong&gt;

Buy soma online....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Soma online soma buy soma online&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Buy soma online&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#124; todaystopnewsnow.com &#124; VIDEO: GOP HAD A PLAN &#124;</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/11/video-gop-had-a-plan/comment-page-2/#comment-2420612</link>
		<dc:creator>&#124; todaystopnewsnow.com &#124; VIDEO: GOP HAD A PLAN &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 06:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=58598#comment-2420612</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve had this for a couple of days, but perhaps today is better for rolling out the pushback from the House Republicans on the economy. [...] Read the rest &#187; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve had this for a couple of days, but perhaps today is better for rolling out the pushback from the House Republicans on the economy. [...] Read the rest &raquo; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiah Films</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/11/video-gop-had-a-plan/comment-page-2/#comment-2420562</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah Films</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 04:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=58598#comment-2420562</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;US Congress...&lt;/strong&gt;

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>US Congress&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guntotinglibertarian</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/11/video-gop-had-a-plan/comment-page-2/#comment-2420522</link>
		<dc:creator>guntotinglibertarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 02:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=58598#comment-2420522</guid>
		<description>It just occurred to me that another amateurish note to this GOP ad is the &quot;1.96 million jobs lost&quot; headline.

Retailers since the dawn of the Republic have understood that prices domininated as $1.95 or $1.99 - or $1.96 - seem, to the consumer - to be substantially less than $2.00.

I realize that the GOP tries to be the &quot;honest party&quot;, but what the hell... that headline should have read, &quot;2 million jjobs lost&quot;&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It just occurred to me that another amateurish note to this GOP ad is the &#8220;1.96 million jobs lost&#8221; headline.</p>
<p>Retailers since the dawn of the Republic have understood that prices domininated as $1.95 or $1.99 &#8211; or $1.96 &#8211; seem, to the consumer &#8211; to be substantially less than $2.00.</p>
<p>I realize that the GOP tries to be the &#8220;honest party&#8221;, but what the hell&#8230; that headline should have read, &#8220;2 million jjobs lost&#8221;&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guntotinglibertarian</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/11/video-gop-had-a-plan/comment-page-2/#comment-2420449</link>
		<dc:creator>guntotinglibertarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 01:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=58598#comment-2420449</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; any tax break could be considered a subsidy of sorts.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;


Please, please, please do not go down that road.  That is the reasoning of the Dems: government, by right, commands 100% of your income and any level less than 100% constitutes a &quot;tax break&quot;.


Domestic ethanol, by the way, benefits from more than just a &quot;tax break&quot; - it benefits from prohibitive tariffs which exclude Brazil&#039;s more efficient sugar-based ethanol.  (Not that I am for ethanol, period.)


Our tax system is a nightmare of smoke, mirrors and special-interest looting.  The Republicans play that game along with the Dems.  


What we need is a flat tax, a &quot;fair tax&quot; or - preferably - repeal of the 16th Amendment. 
 

We also need to assure that the 60% of families who are essentially paying zero income tax contribute a reasonable amount to pay for the the cost of government. If they are not required to pay for those costs, they will demand infinite expansion of the size of government.


What we &lt;em&gt;do not need&lt;/em&gt; is for the Republicans to come up with more cockamamie subsidies for alternative energy. 
 

Govgirl isn&#039;t a bad sort, but her assertion that those of us who choose to hold Republican politicians&#039; feet to the fire are DISHONEST is irritating, to say the least.


I realize that there has been much buzz about Eric Cantor as some dreamy rising star in the GOP, but his statement on the House floor about the &quot;noble&quot; effort to reduce greenhouse gases just tells me - as it tells you - that he&#039;d be perfectly happy to bend over for anyone who will give him some Sunday air time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> any tax break could be considered a subsidy of sorts.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Please, please, please do not go down that road.  That is the reasoning of the Dems: government, by right, commands 100% of your income and any level less than 100% constitutes a &#8220;tax break&#8221;.</p>
<p>Domestic ethanol, by the way, benefits from more than just a &#8220;tax break&#8221; &#8211; it benefits from prohibitive tariffs which exclude Brazil&#8217;s more efficient sugar-based ethanol.  (Not that I am for ethanol, period.)</p>
<p>Our tax system is a nightmare of smoke, mirrors and special-interest looting.  The Republicans play that game along with the Dems.  </p>
<p>What we need is a flat tax, a &#8220;fair tax&#8221; or &#8211; preferably &#8211; repeal of the 16th Amendment. </p>
<p>We also need to assure that the 60% of families who are essentially paying zero income tax contribute a reasonable amount to pay for the the cost of government. If they are not required to pay for those costs, they will demand infinite expansion of the size of government.</p>
<p>What we <em>do not need</em> is for the Republicans to come up with more cockamamie subsidies for alternative energy. </p>
<p>Govgirl isn&#8217;t a bad sort, but her assertion that those of us who choose to hold Republican politicians&#8217; feet to the fire are DISHONEST is irritating, to say the least.</p>
<p>I realize that there has been much buzz about Eric Cantor as some dreamy rising star in the GOP, but his statement on the House floor about the &#8220;noble&#8221; effort to reduce greenhouse gases just tells me &#8211; as it tells you &#8211; that he&#8217;d be perfectly happy to bend over for anyone who will give him some Sunday air time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Z</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/11/video-gop-had-a-plan/comment-page-2/#comment-2419883</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 16:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=58598#comment-2419883</guid>
		<description>The ad is too long. They spent too much time talking about the fact that the Obama stimulus HASN&#039;T done its job. They could have cut 30 seconds out of that part, kept the part about the GOP plan, and been much more effective in less time (which is expensive for ads).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ad is too long. They spent too much time talking about the fact that the Obama stimulus HASN&#8217;T done its job. They could have cut 30 seconds out of that part, kept the part about the GOP plan, and been much more effective in less time (which is expensive for ads).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Laskie</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/11/video-gop-had-a-plan/comment-page-2/#comment-2419647</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Laskie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 14:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=58598#comment-2419647</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; Libertarian Joseph on July 12, 2009 at 9:35 AM &lt;/blockquote&gt; Exactly we need to eliminate the following federal department and agencies- USDA, DOC, ED, HHS, HUD, DOL, DOI, DOT, DEA,and ATF we then could cut way back on DOJ and Federal courts. I would also limit DHS. Give rights back to states and let federal government handle foreign affairs and limited domestics issues like DOE and assisting states with interstate issues. States already have laws for crimes that are now federal also. FBI should be used as resource for states only for inter state serial killers and such. Federal Marshals have become tax police letting federal government steal your belongings. We also need to help support freedom of other people around the world in our own interest. If we don&#039;t step up to task no one will and it will come back to us in some negative way. I think that abortion is a states rights issue but don&#039;t think it is right. A woman has right to say no, right to say do not enter, right to say use condom or other birth control, but once she has given right to an act that most likely will result in pregnancy, then the developing child has rights to life.  Treasury needs to be limited to task of keeping long term inflation at zero and nothing else like ensuring full employment. LET THE MARKET FREE!!! CATO has good stuff on this. SS and Medicare has people already invested their money but should be privatized. Health care should be portable state to state and job to job, with some kind of unemployment insurance bridge over component. NO SINGLE PAYER DOCTOR Kevorkian run system. Obama regime is as far from the above as we have gotten so far in our history. We need to take our country back or God help US!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> Libertarian Joseph on July 12, 2009 at 9:35 AM </p></blockquote>
<p> Exactly we need to eliminate the following federal department and agencies- USDA, DOC, ED, HHS, HUD, DOL, DOI, DOT, DEA,and ATF we then could cut way back on DOJ and Federal courts. I would also limit DHS. Give rights back to states and let federal government handle foreign affairs and limited domestics issues like DOE and assisting states with interstate issues. States already have laws for crimes that are now federal also. FBI should be used as resource for states only for inter state serial killers and such. Federal Marshals have become tax police letting federal government steal your belongings. We also need to help support freedom of other people around the world in our own interest. If we don&#8217;t step up to task no one will and it will come back to us in some negative way. I think that abortion is a states rights issue but don&#8217;t think it is right. A woman has right to say no, right to say do not enter, right to say use condom or other birth control, but once she has given right to an act that most likely will result in pregnancy, then the developing child has rights to life.  Treasury needs to be limited to task of keeping long term inflation at zero and nothing else like ensuring full employment. LET THE MARKET FREE!!! CATO has good stuff on this. SS and Medicare has people already invested their money but should be privatized. Health care should be portable state to state and job to job, with some kind of unemployment insurance bridge over component. NO SINGLE PAYER DOCTOR Kevorkian run system. Obama regime is as far from the above as we have gotten so far in our history. We need to take our country back or God help US!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Laskie</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/11/video-gop-had-a-plan/comment-page-2/#comment-2419599</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Laskie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 14:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=58598#comment-2419599</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; Precisely! Global warming/climate change is the single biggest hoax perpetrated on mankind ever. It’s astonishing that they’ve managed to pull this off and, you are so right, anyone who lends it any credence whatsoever is suspect.
califcon on July 11, 2009 at 5:16 PM &lt;/blockquote&gt;
I agree and disagree- The evidence that C02 is rising has good evidence. The connection that it is causing global warming is not by far proven. Humans causing rise in CO2 maybe but the solutions by the liberals are insane, dangerous and dose nothing to improve the environment. The Human CO2 connection is the weight of Carbon that was sequestered in form of coal and oil that was removed and burned into Atmosphere. Cap and Trade and other international carbon laws are not environment fixes, they are wealth distribution schemes. Giving exemptions to China is the biggest environmental hypocrisy of them all, as anyone who has visited China interior will tell you. Smoke from coal heating and cooking has filled the air. I awoke in my 5 star hotel and thought the place was on fire, until I realized it was the pollution. A smart conservative way is called &lt;a href=&quot;http://terrapreta.bioenergylists.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Bio-Char.&lt;/a&gt; Many start up companies have already the solution to sequestering carbon and other economic benefits. Bio-Char (charcoal ) is a method of making charcoal from agricultural waste and then using it as fertilizer mix to improve crop yields by 20%.   The by products is Bio-Oil and the gas (Methane) which is used it self for making  Bio-Char and extra left over for sale or local generation of electricity. As conservative we must not let liberals to paint us as anti-environment.  They are the ones to take a real issue like race and environment and subvert it into some insane scheme which doses nothing to protect or correct and gives them continuing issues to make careers out of.  Race should be colour blind issue and environment should be based on sound science that first doses no harm. We must show a smarter way.  Liberals think humans are not part of environment and would let their children be eaten by mountain lions for the greater good of the environment.  Nature adapts to changes. The earth seeks balance. Some species need to be extinct as they are not fit for future. Liberals would like to bring back dinosaurs so they could eat their kids also. Not to say I want mountain lions to go extinct.  Conservatives love the environment we are just not into tree sex. No one wants pollution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> Precisely! Global warming/climate change is the single biggest hoax perpetrated on mankind ever. It’s astonishing that they’ve managed to pull this off and, you are so right, anyone who lends it any credence whatsoever is suspect.<br />
califcon on July 11, 2009 at 5:16 PM </p></blockquote>
<p>I agree and disagree- The evidence that C02 is rising has good evidence. The connection that it is causing global warming is not by far proven. Humans causing rise in CO2 maybe but the solutions by the liberals are insane, dangerous and dose nothing to improve the environment. The Human CO2 connection is the weight of Carbon that was sequestered in form of coal and oil that was removed and burned into Atmosphere. Cap and Trade and other international carbon laws are not environment fixes, they are wealth distribution schemes. Giving exemptions to China is the biggest environmental hypocrisy of them all, as anyone who has visited China interior will tell you. Smoke from coal heating and cooking has filled the air. I awoke in my 5 star hotel and thought the place was on fire, until I realized it was the pollution. A smart conservative way is called <a href="http://terrapreta.bioenergylists.org/" rel="nofollow"> Bio-Char.</a> Many start up companies have already the solution to sequestering carbon and other economic benefits. Bio-Char (charcoal ) is a method of making charcoal from agricultural waste and then using it as fertilizer mix to improve crop yields by 20%.   The by products is Bio-Oil and the gas (Methane) which is used it self for making  Bio-Char and extra left over for sale or local generation of electricity. As conservative we must not let liberals to paint us as anti-environment.  They are the ones to take a real issue like race and environment and subvert it into some insane scheme which doses nothing to protect or correct and gives them continuing issues to make careers out of.  Race should be colour blind issue and environment should be based on sound science that first doses no harm. We must show a smarter way.  Liberals think humans are not part of environment and would let their children be eaten by mountain lions for the greater good of the environment.  Nature adapts to changes. The earth seeks balance. Some species need to be extinct as they are not fit for future. Liberals would like to bring back dinosaurs so they could eat their kids also. Not to say I want mountain lions to go extinct.  Conservatives love the environment we are just not into tree sex. No one wants pollution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Libertarian Joseph</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/11/video-gop-had-a-plan/comment-page-2/#comment-2419573</link>
		<dc:creator>Libertarian Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 13:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=58598#comment-2419573</guid>
		<description>facilitate*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>facilitate*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Libertarian Joseph</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/11/video-gop-had-a-plan/comment-page-2/#comment-2419569</link>
		<dc:creator>Libertarian Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 13:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=58598#comment-2419569</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;ynot4tony2 on July 12, 2009 at 9:14 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Government should always be on the look out on ways to cut jobs from government IMO. The way to help facliliate economic growth (job creation) is by cutting taxes and deregulating industries. You can also increase the level of &lt;em&gt;good&lt;/em&gt; jobs by privatizing things and using those funds to fill budget gaps. The free market runs roads a lot better than government. John Stossel had a special on it on 20/20</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>ynot4tony2 on July 12, 2009 at 9:14 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Government should always be on the look out on ways to cut jobs from government IMO. The way to help facliliate economic growth (job creation) is by cutting taxes and deregulating industries. You can also increase the level of <em>good</em> jobs by privatizing things and using those funds to fill budget gaps. The free market runs roads a lot better than government. John Stossel had a special on it on 20/20</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ynot4tony2</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/11/video-gop-had-a-plan/comment-page-2/#comment-2419542</link>
		<dc:creator>ynot4tony2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 13:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=58598#comment-2419542</guid>
		<description>The problem with this ad is that it tries to both criticize the stimulus package &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;tout their own plan.  

This is a lot to cover in a single political ad...especially if the writers of the ad feel compelled to drill the main point multiple times and include slow-printing text on the screen (as so many ads are oft want to do).

The part about their own plan was especially weak.  Create jobs how, I would ask (if I were the opposition).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with this ad is that it tries to both criticize the stimulus package <strong><em>and</em></strong>tout their own plan.  </p>
<p>This is a lot to cover in a single political ad&#8230;especially if the writers of the ad feel compelled to drill the main point multiple times and include slow-printing text on the screen (as so many ads are oft want to do).</p>
<p>The part about their own plan was especially weak.  Create jobs how, I would ask (if I were the opposition).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SKYFOX</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/11/video-gop-had-a-plan/comment-page-2/#comment-2419530</link>
		<dc:creator>SKYFOX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 12:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=58598#comment-2419530</guid>
		<description>guntotinglibertarian

Yes, less of a whore is still a whore and we should turn our backs on any Republican who exhibits gutless whorishness as they will turn from high-dollar call-girl to two-bit crack whore at the drop of a campaign contribution.
But I think you are assuming too much to think Govgirl supports ethanol subsidies as &quot;incentives&quot;.  Remember, any tax break could be considered a subsidy of sorts.  
I think you two are aiming for the same end result.  You, my libertarian friend, are less willing to compromise along the way while Govgirl may see herself as the more pragmatic.  Every time the Republicans have &quot;compromised&quot; with the Dems, they paste another &quot;kick me&quot; sign on their own backs.  But at least they get invited to Sunday chat shows for it.  What more should they expect?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>guntotinglibertarian</p>
<p>Yes, less of a whore is still a whore and we should turn our backs on any Republican who exhibits gutless whorishness as they will turn from high-dollar call-girl to two-bit crack whore at the drop of a campaign contribution.<br />
But I think you are assuming too much to think Govgirl supports ethanol subsidies as &#8220;incentives&#8221;.  Remember, any tax break could be considered a subsidy of sorts.<br />
I think you two are aiming for the same end result.  You, my libertarian friend, are less willing to compromise along the way while Govgirl may see herself as the more pragmatic.  Every time the Republicans have &#8220;compromised&#8221; with the Dems, they paste another &#8220;kick me&#8221; sign on their own backs.  But at least they get invited to Sunday chat shows for it.  What more should they expect?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Charles G. Waugh</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/11/video-gop-had-a-plan/comment-page-2/#comment-2419461</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Charles G. Waugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 08:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=58598#comment-2419461</guid>
		<description>What I keep hearing from the Democrats is that they inherited a worse mess than they thought.

What I haven&#039;t heard from the Republicans is that the Democratic policies have made this mess, and are continuing to make it even worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I keep hearing from the Democrats is that they inherited a worse mess than they thought.</p>
<p>What I haven&#8217;t heard from the Republicans is that the Democratic policies have made this mess, and are continuing to make it even worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On Watch</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/11/video-gop-had-a-plan/comment-page-2/#comment-2419383</link>
		<dc:creator>On Watch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 04:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=58598#comment-2419383</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I personally think that accepting the opponents foundational assumption and STILL showing their logic to be faulty is good debate strategy... GovGirl&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hmmm, yeah, just about as &quot;good a strategy&quot; as shooting your foot off in the middle of a foot race!  What the Cantor said was that &lt;em&gt;&quot;removing C02 from the atmosphere was a &lt;strong&gt;Nobel endeavor&lt;/strong&gt;&quot;&lt;/em&gt; Nobel endeavor my arse, and polls show that most US voters feel the same way about this CO2/Global Warming hoax!

This abject surrender of intellectual and political principle is just another example of the GOP moderate wing bending over and kissing the opposition&#039;s warts lovingly! No damn wonder the Republican party evokes &quot;0&quot; respect from the conservative wing.

There was absolutely NO need for Cantor to punch the Democrat&#039;s Carbon Tax ticket. Pssst Just STFU if you think this justification for a taxpayer rip-off is such a Peach! How long will it take the Left to throw Cantor&#039;s &quot;CO2 Nobel Endevor&quot; description back in his face? The GOP continues as a party that is unequipped to fight this statist enemy and win -- just more of the same Juan McCain  ass-up strategery that left US sucking hind tit during the last campaign.

&lt;em&gt;&quot;Let&#039;s Roll&quot;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I personally think that accepting the opponents foundational assumption and STILL showing their logic to be faulty is good debate strategy&#8230; GovGirl</p></blockquote>
<p>Hmmm, yeah, just about as &#8220;good a strategy&#8221; as shooting your foot off in the middle of a foot race!  What the Cantor said was that <em>&#8220;removing C02 from the atmosphere was a <strong>Nobel endeavor</strong>&#8220;</em> Nobel endeavor my arse, and polls show that most US voters feel the same way about this CO2/Global Warming hoax!</p>
<p>This abject surrender of intellectual and political principle is just another example of the GOP moderate wing bending over and kissing the opposition&#8217;s warts lovingly! No damn wonder the Republican party evokes &#8220;0&#8243; respect from the conservative wing.</p>
<p>There was absolutely NO need for Cantor to punch the Democrat&#8217;s Carbon Tax ticket. Pssst Just STFU if you think this justification for a taxpayer rip-off is such a Peach! How long will it take the Left to throw Cantor&#8217;s &#8220;CO2 Nobel Endevor&#8221; description back in his face? The GOP continues as a party that is unequipped to fight this statist enemy and win &#8212; just more of the same Juan McCain  ass-up strategery that left US sucking hind tit during the last campaign.</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Let&#8217;s Roll&#8221;</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Libertarian Joseph</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/11/video-gop-had-a-plan/comment-page-2/#comment-2419368</link>
		<dc:creator>Libertarian Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 04:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=58598#comment-2419368</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Video: GOP had a plan&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Me too!

1. 1 year tax holiday
2. gut federal spending on social programs, eliminate most of the abc departments
3. try to extend the tax holiday, if unable to, then switch to a flat tax and set a low rate. It has worked out well for eastern european countries. I think it&#039;s the best statist tax system on the market. I&#039;d prefer to have nothing, but I know that&#039;s not even popular in the anti-tax GOP.

4. privatize roads to pay fund what&#039;s left of the budget.

5. modernize/upgrade military

6. start using strategic foreign. why are we sending billions to Iran in aid? I heard about this. Makes no sense. I&#039;m not a big fan of foreign aid, but if done, it should at least be in national interest

7. &quot;energy independence&quot; which means deregulate the energy industry so we can get some damn power plants built

just for starters. yeah, preaching to the choir ... blah</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Video: GOP had a plan</p></blockquote>
<p>Me too!</p>
<p>1. 1 year tax holiday<br />
2. gut federal spending on social programs, eliminate most of the abc departments<br />
3. try to extend the tax holiday, if unable to, then switch to a flat tax and set a low rate. It has worked out well for eastern european countries. I think it&#8217;s the best statist tax system on the market. I&#8217;d prefer to have nothing, but I know that&#8217;s not even popular in the anti-tax GOP.</p>
<p>4. privatize roads to pay fund what&#8217;s left of the budget.</p>
<p>5. modernize/upgrade military</p>
<p>6. start using strategic foreign. why are we sending billions to Iran in aid? I heard about this. Makes no sense. I&#8217;m not a big fan of foreign aid, but if done, it should at least be in national interest</p>
<p>7. &#8220;energy independence&#8221; which means deregulate the energy industry so we can get some damn power plants built</p>
<p>just for starters. yeah, preaching to the choir &#8230; blah</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Libertarian Joseph</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/11/video-gop-had-a-plan/comment-page-2/#comment-2419346</link>
		<dc:creator>Libertarian Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 04:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=58598#comment-2419346</guid>
		<description>I mean that they know that the people won&#039;t tolerate their tax hikes once they get a taste of &lt;em&gt;real&lt;/em&gt; tax cuts. They fear that. They don&#039;t care if it increases revenues, they don&#039;t want to gut their worthless vote buying programs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean that they know that the people won&#8217;t tolerate their tax hikes once they get a taste of <em>real</em> tax cuts. They fear that. They don&#8217;t care if it increases revenues, they don&#8217;t want to gut their worthless vote buying programs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Libertarian Joseph</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/11/video-gop-had-a-plan/comment-page-2/#comment-2419343</link>
		<dc:creator>Libertarian Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 03:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=58598#comment-2419343</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; During the Stimulus debate, I almost fell out of my chair when I saw a clip of Senator Kerry saying (approximately) that ‘ we can’t trust that the citizens will spend the money correctly if we just give it back to them’….I don’t remember the exact quote, but it was in effect what I’ve written.

Red State State of Mind on July 11, 2009 at 11:51 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

ha no surprise. I think dems don&#039;t want &lt;strong&gt;real&lt;/strong&gt; tax cuts because they know they can&#039;t get away with taxing the hell out of everyone in order to help pay for all of their worthless programs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> During the Stimulus debate, I almost fell out of my chair when I saw a clip of Senator Kerry saying (approximately) that ‘ we can’t trust that the citizens will spend the money correctly if we just give it back to them’….I don’t remember the exact quote, but it was in effect what I’ve written.</p>
<p>Red State State of Mind on July 11, 2009 at 11:51 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>ha no surprise. I think dems don&#8217;t want <strong>real</strong> tax cuts because they know they can&#8217;t get away with taxing the hell out of everyone in order to help pay for all of their worthless programs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red State State of Mind</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/11/video-gop-had-a-plan/comment-page-2/#comment-2419332</link>
		<dc:creator>Red State State of Mind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 03:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=58598#comment-2419332</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;My stimulus package:

A one year income tax holiday for ALL US citizens.

Total cost: $800 billion.

hmmmm hey, wait a minute! Isn’t that what porkulus costed? err minus the interest

Libertarian Joseph on July 11, 2009 at 11:47 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt; During the Stimulus debate, I almost fell out of my chair when I saw a clip of Senator Kerry saying (approximately) that &#039; we can&#039;t trust that the citizens will spend the money correctly if we just give it back to them&#039;....I don&#039;t remember the exact quote, but it was in effect what I&#039;ve written.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>My stimulus package:</p>
<p>A one year income tax holiday for ALL US citizens.</p>
<p>Total cost: $800 billion.</p>
<p>hmmmm hey, wait a minute! Isn’t that what porkulus costed? err minus the interest</p>
<p>Libertarian Joseph on July 11, 2009 at 11:47 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p> During the Stimulus debate, I almost fell out of my chair when I saw a clip of Senator Kerry saying (approximately) that &#8216; we can&#8217;t trust that the citizens will spend the money correctly if we just give it back to them&#8217;&#8230;.I don&#8217;t remember the exact quote, but it was in effect what I&#8217;ve written.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red State State of Mind</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/11/video-gop-had-a-plan/comment-page-2/#comment-2419326</link>
		<dc:creator>Red State State of Mind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 03:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=58598#comment-2419326</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;When is the GOP going to stop letting the Commies set the debate? Global warming, Global warming. Global warming is a complete and utter fraud. When is the GOP going to take the pruning shears to the Federal Government. Nixon’s EPA needs a major budget reduction, the socialist re-education department needs to be gutted.

Kjeil on July 11, 2009 at 7:49 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;Kjeil=Sanity</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>When is the GOP going to stop letting the Commies set the debate? Global warming, Global warming. Global warming is a complete and utter fraud. When is the GOP going to take the pruning shears to the Federal Government. Nixon’s EPA needs a major budget reduction, the socialist re-education department needs to be gutted.</p>
<p>Kjeil on July 11, 2009 at 7:49 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Kjeil=Sanity</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Libertarian Joseph</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/11/video-gop-had-a-plan/comment-page-2/#comment-2419322</link>
		<dc:creator>Libertarian Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 03:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=58598#comment-2419322</guid>
		<description>My stimulus package:

A one year income tax holiday for ALL US citizens.

Total cost: $800 billion.

hmmmm hey, wait a minute! Isn&#039;t that what porkulus costed? err minus the interest</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My stimulus package:</p>
<p>A one year income tax holiday for ALL US citizens.</p>
<p>Total cost: $800 billion.</p>
<p>hmmmm hey, wait a minute! Isn&#8217;t that what porkulus costed? err minus the interest</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vntnrse</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/11/video-gop-had-a-plan/comment-page-2/#comment-2419301</link>
		<dc:creator>Vntnrse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 03:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=58598#comment-2419301</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t call it noise!  I love it!  Makes me think back to younger days!!!   hee hee hee!!!

The only spanish I know &lt;em&gt;would&lt;/em&gt; get my face slapped!!!

Leavenorth is not duty!  That&#039;s torture!  NOT for the prisoners, for the staff!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t call it noise!  I love it!  Makes me think back to younger days!!!   hee hee hee!!!</p>
<p>The only spanish I know <em>would</em> get my face slapped!!!</p>
<p>Leavenorth is not duty!  That&#8217;s torture!  NOT for the prisoners, for the staff!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillH</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/11/video-gop-had-a-plan/comment-page-2/#comment-2419220</link>
		<dc:creator>BillH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 02:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=58598#comment-2419220</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Hi Bill! I was stationed at Miramar when I first came here in the first fleet F-14 squadron when Miramar was still an NAS….but you might as well call it Miramar….we’re in Santee….the helos and F-18’s go right over our house in the landing pattern! :)

(by the way I’m so rusty at Deutsch that I had to have my daughter translate the finer points! That was more then 30 years ago! rotfl!!!!! I did get most of it though….. ;)

Vntnrse on July 11, 2009 at 9:53 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Helos and F18&#039;s aren&#039;t noise, they&#039;re the sound of freedom-
you know that :)
I came back to San Diego in &#039;77 after my dad retired from the Corps. I always liked the reaction from people when I tell them his last duty station was Leavenworth (there IS a reason for that). 

Sorgen Sie nicht uber seiner Deutsch- mine is also pretty bad. Just useful enough to order some parts from Germany. I have in the ensuing time learned enough Spanish to order a taco without having my face slapped :O</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Hi Bill! I was stationed at Miramar when I first came here in the first fleet F-14 squadron when Miramar was still an NAS….but you might as well call it Miramar….we’re in Santee….the helos and F-18’s go right over our house in the landing pattern! :)</p>
<p>(by the way I’m so rusty at Deutsch that I had to have my daughter translate the finer points! That was more then 30 years ago! rotfl!!!!! I did get most of it though….. ;)</p>
<p>Vntnrse on July 11, 2009 at 9:53 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Helos and F18&#8217;s aren&#8217;t noise, they&#8217;re the sound of freedom-<br />
you know that :)<br />
I came back to San Diego in &#8216;77 after my dad retired from the Corps. I always liked the reaction from people when I tell them his last duty station was Leavenworth (there IS a reason for that). </p>
<p>Sorgen Sie nicht uber seiner Deutsch- mine is also pretty bad. Just useful enough to order some parts from Germany. I have in the ensuing time learned enough Spanish to order a taco without having my face slapped :O</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: massrighty</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/11/video-gop-had-a-plan/comment-page-2/#comment-2419211</link>
		<dc:creator>massrighty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 02:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=58598#comment-2419211</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Now that we can’t do anything as a political party we finally have a plan? When we had control for 8 years what was our plan for Health Care? What about that disaster of a plan for immigration? Our plan for the economy was non-existant until this crisis began and it was the same, but smaller, than Obama’s. How many republicans backed that plan? ALOT. Now they claim to have offered a different plan? They made their claim to a different plan illegitimate after backing TARP1. Sorry. I’m not convinced.

MichiganMatt on July 11, 2009 at 9:58 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Hello, and welcome to Hot Air;

&lt;blockquote&gt;When we had control for &lt;strike&gt;8&lt;/strike&gt;&lt;strong&gt; 6 &lt;/strong&gt;years what was our plan for Health Care?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Continuing to have the very best health care in the world. 

If you mean, what did we plan to do about how health care is funded, that’s different.

Our plan was to let market forces work.

&lt;blockquote&gt;What about that disaster of a plan for immigration?&lt;/blockquote&gt;


That was a disaster; so-called moderate Republicans worked with Democrats on a plan that the American people didn’t like. Thankfully, President Bush didn’t appoint an immigration czar, or legalize illegal immigration by executive order. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;Our plan for the economy was non-existant until this crisis began&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Before it was a disaster, there were some warning signs; some tried to put controls and limits on the parts of the economy that were spinning out of control (do the research on Fannie and Freddie;) Barney Frank and Chris Dodd, along with the Democratic congressional leadership, stopped them.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Sorry.&lt;/blockquote&gt;


Apology accepted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Now that we can’t do anything as a political party we finally have a plan? When we had control for 8 years what was our plan for Health Care? What about that disaster of a plan for immigration? Our plan for the economy was non-existant until this crisis began and it was the same, but smaller, than Obama’s. How many republicans backed that plan? ALOT. Now they claim to have offered a different plan? They made their claim to a different plan illegitimate after backing TARP1. Sorry. I’m not convinced.</p>
<p>MichiganMatt on July 11, 2009 at 9:58 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Hello, and welcome to Hot Air;</p>
<blockquote><p>When we had control for <strike>8</strike><strong> 6 </strong>years what was our plan for Health Care?</p></blockquote>
<p>Continuing to have the very best health care in the world. </p>
<p>If you mean, what did we plan to do about how health care is funded, that’s different.</p>
<p>Our plan was to let market forces work.</p>
<blockquote><p>What about that disaster of a plan for immigration?</p></blockquote>
<p>That was a disaster; so-called moderate Republicans worked with Democrats on a plan that the American people didn’t like. Thankfully, President Bush didn’t appoint an immigration czar, or legalize illegal immigration by executive order. </p>
<blockquote><p>Our plan for the economy was non-existant until this crisis began</p></blockquote>
<p>Before it was a disaster, there were some warning signs; some tried to put controls and limits on the parts of the economy that were spinning out of control (do the research on Fannie and Freddie;) Barney Frank and Chris Dodd, along with the Democratic congressional leadership, stopped them.</p>
<blockquote><p>Sorry.</p></blockquote>
<p>Apology accepted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: massrighty</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/11/video-gop-had-a-plan/comment-page-2/#comment-2419197</link>
		<dc:creator>massrighty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 02:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=58598#comment-2419197</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Now that we can’t do anything as a political party we finally have a plan? When we had control for 8 years what was our plan for Health Care? What about that disaster of a plan for immigration? Our plan for the economy was non-existant until this crisis began and it was the same, but smaller, than Obama’s. How many republicans backed that plan? ALOT. Now they claim to have offered a different plan? They made their claim to a different plan illegitimate after backing TARP1. Sorry. I’m not convinced.

MichiganMatt on July 11, 2009 at 9:58 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hello, and welcome to Hot Air;

&lt;blockquote&gt;When we had control for &lt;strike&gt;8&lt;/strike&gt; &lt;strong&gt;6 &lt;/strong&gt;years what was our plan for Health Care?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Continuing to have the very best health care in the world. 

If you mean, what did we plan to do about how health care is funded, that&#039;s different.

Our plan was to let market forces work.

What about that disaster of a plan for immigration?&lt;blockquote&gt;

That was a disaster; so-called moderate Republicans worked with Democrats on a plan that the American people didn&#039;t like. Thankfully, President Bush didn&#039;t appoint an immigration czar, or legalize illegal immigration by executive order. 

&lt;/blockquote&gt;Our plan for the economy was non-existant until this crisis began &lt;blockquote&gt;

Before it was a disaster, there were some warning signs; some tried to put controls and limits on the parts of the economy that were spinning out of control (do the research on Fannie and Freddie;) Barney Frank and Chris Dodd, along with the Democratic congressional leadership, stopped them.

&lt;/blockquote&gt;Sorry.&lt;blockquote&gt;

Apology accepted.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Now that we can’t do anything as a political party we finally have a plan? When we had control for 8 years what was our plan for Health Care? What about that disaster of a plan for immigration? Our plan for the economy was non-existant until this crisis began and it was the same, but smaller, than Obama’s. How many republicans backed that plan? ALOT. Now they claim to have offered a different plan? They made their claim to a different plan illegitimate after backing TARP1. Sorry. I’m not convinced.</p>
<p>MichiganMatt on July 11, 2009 at 9:58 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Hello, and welcome to Hot Air;</p>
<blockquote><p>When we had control for <strike>8</strike> <strong>6 </strong>years what was our plan for Health Care?</p></blockquote>
<p>Continuing to have the very best health care in the world. </p>
<p>If you mean, what did we plan to do about how health care is funded, that&#8217;s different.</p>
<p>Our plan was to let market forces work.</p>
<p>What about that disaster of a plan for immigration?<br />
<blockquote>
<p>That was a disaster; so-called moderate Republicans worked with Democrats on a plan that the American people didn&#8217;t like. Thankfully, President Bush didn&#8217;t appoint an immigration czar, or legalize illegal immigration by executive order. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Our plan for the economy was non-existant until this crisis began<br />
<blockquote>
<p>Before it was a disaster, there were some warning signs; some tried to put controls and limits on the parts of the economy that were spinning out of control (do the research on Fannie and Freddie;) Barney Frank and Chris Dodd, along with the Democratic congressional leadership, stopped them.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Sorry.<br />
<blockquote>
<p>Apology accepted.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichiganMatt</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/11/video-gop-had-a-plan/comment-page-2/#comment-2419185</link>
		<dc:creator>MichiganMatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 01:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=58598#comment-2419185</guid>
		<description>Now that we can&#039;t do anything as a political party we finally have a plan? When we had control for 8 years what was our plan for Health Care? What about that disaster of a plan for immigration? Our plan for the economy was non-existant until this crisis began and it was the same, but smaller, than Obama&#039;s. How many republicans backed that plan? ALOT. Now they claim to have offered a different plan? They made their claim to a different plan illegitimate after backing TARP1. Sorry. I&#039;m not convinced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that we can&#8217;t do anything as a political party we finally have a plan? When we had control for 8 years what was our plan for Health Care? What about that disaster of a plan for immigration? Our plan for the economy was non-existant until this crisis began and it was the same, but smaller, than Obama&#8217;s. How many republicans backed that plan? ALOT. Now they claim to have offered a different plan? They made their claim to a different plan illegitimate after backing TARP1. Sorry. I&#8217;m not convinced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
