A Seemingly Very Nice Middle-Class Girl
posted at 11:00 am on July 11, 2009 by Doctor Zero
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Peggy Noonan used her Friday column in the Wall Street Journal to throw some dirt on Sarah Palin’s grave. It’s vintage Noonan: airheaded, dripping with condescension, and completely missing the point. No serious conservative needs to hear anything from Noonan except her groveling apology for being so horribly wrong about Barack Obama, who she energetically supported for president. However, it’s worth picking through the flotsam and jetsam of this embarrassing column, to appreciate the kind of intellectual fat that conservatives need to trim from the Republican Party.
Let’s begin by setting the stage: Sarah Palin resigned her governorship last week, and has no stated plans to run for elective office as of this writing. She has made it clear that she intends to remain on the public stage, and has a bright and useful future of public speaking, writing, and helping her party raise funds for 2010 and beyond. I personally disagree with the assessment that her resignation killed her political future, if she wants one. It will be an obstacle for her to work around, but I think she could overcome it – especially if Alaskans are clearly pleased with her successor, and think well of her as the 2012 elections get under way.
After referencing the way “The left and the media immediately overplayed their hand, with attacks on her children,” Noonan says of Palin:
She went on the trail a sensation but demonstrated in the ensuing months that she was not ready to go national and in fact never would be. She was hungry, loved politics, had charm and energy, loved walking onto the stage, waving and doing the stump speech. All good. But she was not thoughtful. She was a gifted retail politician who displayed the disadvantages of being born into a point of view (in her case a form of conservatism; elsewhere and in other circumstances, it could have been a form of liberalism) and swallowing it whole: She never learned how the other sides think, or why.
I always thought the Wall Street Journal had editors that would review columns to make sure they don’t have annoying run-on sentences that don’t use commas but maybe they don’t and never will. Poor sentence construction aside, Noonan couldn’t be more wrong to say Palin’s point of view “could have been a form of liberalism.” No, Peggy. A charismatic woman espousing a form of liberalism would never have to suffer attacks on her children in the media. People who swallow forms of liberalism are never required to understand the first thing about conservative points of view. They aren’t really expected to know anything about the intellectual history of liberalism, either. Barack Obama couldn’t articulate the principles of conservatism if Thomas Sowell hacked into his teleprompter and fed him the words.
Later, Noonan zeroes in on the moment Palin decisively lost the “moderate Republican” snob vote:
She couldn’t say what she read because she didn’t read anything. She was utterly unconcerned by all this and seemed in fact rather proud of it: It was evidence of her authenticity. She experienced criticism as both partisan and cruel because she could see no truth in any of it. She wasn’t thoughtful enough to know she wasn’t thoughtful enough. Her presentation up to the end has been scattered, illogical, manipulative and self-referential to the point of self-reverence. “I’m not wired that way,” “I’m not a quitter,” “I’m standing up for our values.” I’m, I’m, I’m.
Palin doesn’t “read anything,” you see. She’s probably not even literate. The moment Noonan is fretting over came when Katie Couric asked Palin which newspapers and magazines she reads regularly, and she couldn’t name one. Given the cratering circulation of print media, Palin is clearly in good company. I suspect the sin that truly damns her in Noonan’s eyes is her failure to read Peggy Noonan columns. At least America was spared the horror of a Vice President who doesn’t spend much time reading newspapers. Instead, we got a Vice President who should have left his debate with Palin in a straitjacket, and shows no sign of coherent thought at all.
Of course, it’s risible for a breathless supporter of the Lightworker, Barack Obama, to criticize anyone else for self-referential speech. Obama couldn’t deliver a movie review of “Transformers 2” without referring to himself thirty-five times. Maybe Peggy could publish some guidelines on how often female Republican candidates are allowed to refer to themselves, per minute of speech, without being guilty of arrogance. Would she feel better if Palin talked about herself in the third person, like Bob Dole?
Dismissing the affection conservatives supposedly feel for Palin because of her “working-class roots,” Noonan sneers:
She is not working class, never was, and even she, avid claimer of advantage that she is, never claimed to be and just lets others say it. Her father was a teacher and school track coach, her mother the school secretary. They were middle-class figures of respect, stability and local status. I think intellectuals call her working-class because they see the makeup, the hair, the heels and the sleds and think they’re working class “tropes.” Because, you know, that’s what they teach in “Ways of the Working Class” at Yale and Dartmouth.
… and you’ve got that “Ways of the Working Class” textbook on your desk, don’t you, Peggy? I’ll bet it’s heavily indexed with Post-Its, sticking out from the thick pages in a pastel rainbow. Does anyone else find it surreal that she tries to dismiss Palin’s alleged pretensions to middle-class origins by explaining that her father was a school track coach, and her mother was the school secretary? Whoa, you got her there, Peg. She might pose as a moose-hunting soccer mom, but she was to the manor born. What fools we middle-class conservatives were, to accept this scion of soccer-coaching royalty as one of us, just because she hid her imperial velvet beneath a plaid shirt.
Of the idea that Palin made the Republican Party look inclusive, Noonan snarls, “She makes the party look stupid, a party of the easy manipulated.” Well, that’s what they say at the high-toned Washington cocktail parties, where the elite liberals keep Peggy Noonan as a pet, so it must be true. The vast number of Palin admirers will be thrilled to know that Peggy Noonan thinks they’re stupid. I’m sure that will make them rush right into the waiting arms of Noonan and her weak-tea wing of the GOP.
Speaking of phony appeals to middle-class roots, here’s what Noonan had to say about her Prince Charming, Barack Obama, back in 2008:
He climbed steep stairs, born off the continent with no father to guide, a dreamy, abandoning mother, mixed race, no connections. He rose with guts and gifts. He is steady, calm, and, in terms of the execution of his political ascent, still the primary and almost only area in which his executive abilities can be discerned, he shows good judgment in terms of whom to hire and consult, what steps to take and moves to make.
No attempts to manipulate voters with sob stories about humble upbringings in Barack Obama’s biography, no sir!
Noonan responds to the charge that “the media did her in” by saying “her lack of any appropriate modesty did her in.” Remember, an Obama supporter wrote this. For Peggy’s dreamboat, a replicated Greek temple shows appropriate modesty when giving a convention speech. She probably swooned when Obama modestly spent fifty million bucks on his inauguration, prompting outgoing President Bush to declare a state of emergency, to release federal funds for the event.
Granted that the older column I quoted above was written a couple trillion wasted tax dollars ago, before the advent of Turbo Tax Tim and the rest of Obama’s Epic Fail Cabinet, but you still have to love the way Noonan celebrated Obama’s “good judgement in terms of who to hire and consult.” He sure knew how to pick a spiritual advisor, that’s for sure! If only Sarah Palin could have the good judgement to consult with aging hippie radical terrorists, Peggy might finally admire her for something more than being “a very nice middle-class girl with ambition, appetite and no sense of personal limits.” By the way, Noonan delivers this backhanded compliment immediately after the paragraph where she declares Palin’s middle-classness to be a fraud.
Noonan could have used this column to praise Obama’s good judgement in hiring a deranged eugenicist who favors forced abortions and mass sterilization as his “science czar.” Why did she waste it pouring salt into Zombie Sarah Palin’s mouth and sewing her lips closed, so she could never rise from her political grave to threaten Republican voters again? Here’s why Peggy made the effort to snap you out of your stupid, illiterate, soccer-coach-daughter-loving trance:
Here’s why all this matters. The world is a dangerous place. It has never been more so, or more complicated, more straining of the reasoning powers of those with actual genius and true judgment. This is a time for conservative leaders who know how to think.
Here are a few examples of what we may face in the next 10 years: a profound and prolonged American crash, with the admission of bankruptcy and the spread of deep social unrest; one or more American cities getting hit with weapons of mass destruction from an unknown source; faint glimmers of actual secessionist movements as Americans for various reasons and in various areas decide the burdens and assumptions of the federal government are no longer attractive or legitimate.
It never occurs to Noonan that those “glimmers of actual secessionist movements” might be caused by freedom-loving people fleeing the “actual genius and true judgment” of the shady, unqualified junior senator she couldn’t wait to sweep into the White House. Hey, Peg, that “admission of bankruptcy” you’re quivering about? That’s coming because your boy Obama crashed the economy, looted the treasury of the future to serve the ultimate pork dinner to his faithful allies, and appointed fools and frauds to supervise his programs. He’s trying to pass a ludicrous energy plan that will cost each American family thousands of dollars, and guarantee a recession for decades to come. If America doesn’t rally to stop him in 2010, he’ll bury what’s left of the moribund economy under the bloodless husk of a nationalized health-care industry. If McCain had won in 2008, then immediately resigned for health reasons and left Palin in the White House, would she have cost us less than a trillion dollars? If so, she’d be a bargain compared to the nightmare Peggy Noonan helped to unleash.
Noonan is symptomatic of a defeated, collaborative wing of the GOP that wants nothing more than to be thought well of by the Left, which they believe has decisively won the political and cultural battles of the twentieth century. Their idea of a “conservative” is someone who can eke out a small discount on the price tag of mammoth liberal programs. Their goal in 2012 is to find a bland, pleasant, “moderate” Republican, who can win the approval of the media mullahs as a “serious candidate,” then lose gracefully and give America’s First Black President his second term. The idea of serious conservative reform terrifies them: radical overhaul of the tax system, dramatic reduction in the size of government, a system that compels Congress to live like humble servants of the people instead of Renaissance royalty… Who will throw those wonderful cocktail parties in Washington, if the conservatives burn half the city down? Who will tell Peggy bedtime stories of dashing social engineers with titanic government schemes? Where will she find hip, exciting statists she can celebrate with schoolgirl treacle, like this nonsense from her 2008 endorsement of Obama: “Something new is happening in America. It is the imminent arrival of a new liberal moment. History happens, it makes its turns, you hold on for dear life. Life moves.” She was on to something with that last bit. Obama has made a lot of American businesses think about moving.
In her conclusion, Noonan writes, “And so the Republican Party should get serious, as serious as the age, because that is what a grown-up, responsible party—a party that deserves to lead—would do.” This is frothy, delusional milk, sprayed on top of a long, boring latte of condescension. Nothing could be less serious than fawning over a hollow President, who wastes his citizens’ time with absurd fantasies about multi-trillion-dollar health care takeovers, piled on top of an already astronomical national debt. The latest polls suggest the public is becoming impatient with the infantile antics of the party Noonan thought should control both houses of Congress, and the presidency. If Peggy wants to see what an unserious, immature party looks like, she should watch video of Nancy Pelosi stammering about how the CIA lied to her, or leaf through the avalanche of scandals engulfing nearly every major Democrat. She could complete her education by dropping by to watch Al Franken squatting in his brand-new Senate seat.
I have a suggestion for the Wall Street Journal: make this Peggy Noonan’s farewell column, and hire Sarah Palin to take her place. Peggy could head over to the Huffington Post, where she’d be received as a martyred hero. The Journal’s circulation would skyrocket. This economy needs a success story.
Okay, okay, here’s the actual link to the Noonan piece. Trust me, you’re better off clicking the one at the top of the page.
This post was promoted from GreenRoom to HotAir.com.
To see the comments on the original post, look here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
“Read my lips, no new taxes” –Noonan sank the Bush I.
maverick muse on July 11, 2009 at 12:36 PM
I think Doctor Zero has a very good read on Peggy.
Loxodonta on July 11, 2009 at 12:37 PM
“read my lips”, etc
runner on July 11, 2009 at 12:37 PM
In what way, (exactly, with examples) does that comment invoke Marxism.
Or, did your random response generator mis-fire?
massrighty on July 11, 2009 at 12:38 PM
I’ve wondered about this since the ‘wardrobe leaks’ started even before the election, and then were followed by all the other garbage that keeps getting recycled.
It kinda worries me a bit that she (apparently) still communicates with McCain for advice. I especially hope that she takes any advice from him with a ton of salt, especially given that he hasn’t lifted his pinky to defend her against the pond scum he hired to ’support’ her part of the ticket.
ProfessorMiao on July 11, 2009 at 12:39 PM
Excellent post Doctor Zero.
I think you’ve hit the nail on the head- the worst thing that could happen to America is for the GOP elites to manoeuvre a moderate candidate into the race for 2012. After the damage that Pelosi, Reid and Obama have wrought already, Republicans- and the nation- need a steel-willed conservative to take on Washington and slash the fat from the Federal government.
Jay Mac on July 11, 2009 at 12:39 PM
KickandSwimMom on July 11, 2009 at 12:00 PM
Solid observation.
maverick muse on July 11, 2009 at 12:40 PM
I sense the idiot Noonan wrote that piece when she was drunk….again. She must depressed given her inability to give BO a daily tongue bath since he was overseas.
I have been struggling with the amount of liberalism that spread throughout the WSJ, on Monday I will let them know my subscription is terminated.
David in ATL on July 11, 2009 at 12:40 PM
The moonbats are ever so slowly passing the razor over their own throats, but they’re too stupid to realize it.
ddrintn on July 11, 2009 at 12:40 PM
non-sequitor. he wonders why only Palin’s “class” is “petty.” How about yours? Or Noonan’s? Or privileged Obama’s?
JiangxiDad on July 11, 2009 at 12:41 PM
I think they are putting her through the wringer, for sure. If someone like me, markedly liberal on social issues, is curious about her; then that spells trouble for their type of GOP representation.
I’m not even curious about Pawlenty or Romney. (Well, I do like Romney on economic matters.)
She’s engaging, in a gut-level way.
AnninCA on July 11, 2009 at 12:42 PM
yeah, I reluctantly canceled too. Had a subscription for nearly 30 years. Only the ed. page is ok, usually, but certainly not always. The front page is all MSM for sure. And the bus. news I can get online. So goodbye.
JiangxiDad on July 11, 2009 at 12:43 PM
Even if McCain had picked one of those “experienced” women from Texas or Maine, its very easy to see that the libs and Noonan would just have whined that McCain’s VP pick generated no excitement and clung to stale old ideas and why couldn’t he have picked that nice maverick lady from Alaska…..
Speedwagon82 on July 11, 2009 at 12:43 PM
I presume she’s burning no bridges.
That truly would be quitting.
But I agree with your other point. The business about the wardrobe was completely unnecessary. One short explanatory statement from him could have killed it.
I’m afraid John McCain reveal he is the true narcissist in this story. He couldn’t stand to take responsibility for losing. His grandstanding blew his lead. He couldn’t step up and take it.
He let her take the heat. I lost respect for him in the worst way over this.
AnninCA on July 11, 2009 at 12:45 PM
The real difference between Obama’s beginnings and Palin’s? Obama’s been given help his entire life, from the mysterious benefactor who paid for Columbia to Bill Ayers helping launch his political campaign. Even his position as president of the Harvard Law Review was due to them looking for a person with a lot of diversity, which he had by virtue of being bi-racial, and from being the child of a foreigner who lived in Indonesia in childhood.
It’s somewhat demeaning to say that someone is a “diversity hire.” But that’s basically what Obama has been his whole life. (It’s okay. Obama is probably due for a little demeaning, anyway.)
Palin, on the other hand, was never given anything. She had to work her own way through college, she had to work her way to the Governor’s office from the bottom up, starting with city council, then mayor, then an executive position in the Alaska government, and finally running for governor. Along the way, she faced considerable opposition from her own party.
I wonder if that’s why so many people identify with her.
ThereGoesTheNeighborhood on July 11, 2009 at 12:45 PM
Didn’t you already vote for Palin for VP?? And you weren’t even curious about the people McCAin was running against, like Romney. Are you sure you’re not fibbing Ann?
JiangxiDad on July 11, 2009 at 12:45 PM
What’s WSJ?
AnninCA on July 11, 2009 at 12:46 PM
Noonan can only see her own limitations in others. She is a charter member of the club of clueless windbags that pass for journalists today.
littleguy on July 11, 2009 at 12:48 PM
Not really. Sorry, but I’ve never voted Republican in a single election in my lifetime before this past year.
I really was one who moved after the Democratic primary. He did attract some of us. LOL*
I know zip about the GOP inner workings. Zip.
Romney just is a slick looking white guy to me.
This was a HUGE transitional year for me, politically speaking.
I’m now Independent. I’ll listen to any and all. But I’m not getting involved in partisan politics again.
AnninCA on July 11, 2009 at 12:48 PM
This column by Noonan proves my point. It mirrors the column by Sally Quinn. THIS IS ALL ABOUT THE CLASS ISSUE. Quinn, supposedly liberal, and Noonan supposedly conservative both hate Sarah and they both hate Hill btw.
They hate anyone who isnt like them or trying to be like them. They hate anyone who comes from real America and does not try to be something else.
TOTUS is okay with them because he tries so hard to be like them. Unlike the hillbillys TOTUS has the right kind of cocktail parties and invites the right kind of people according to Quinn who bashed Hill for oh so many years before turning her poison pen to Sarah…
sickening, boot all the bums out and I cannot wait for Noonan, Quinn and Dowd’s jobs to be as extinct as their intellectual honesty.
ginaswo on July 11, 2009 at 12:49 PM
I haven’t followed the Sotomayor nomination too closely, but I don’t know what you mean by “pull that junk on Sotomayor.” She may be fine for district court and court of appeals, but I don’t think she has the temperament for SCOTUS. I think (and I may be wrong) that two or three GOPers said something stupid, but one of them was Gingrich, who’s not in office. You need to make sure that you’re not confusing commentators on the right with GOP senators. I think Jeff Sessions and Hatch are doing very well in interviews I’ve seen. Clearly, she probably has the votes–though I question your poll figure of 62% confirmed because I thought she’s been tanking ever since Ricci was decided.
Whatever the case, she’s got some ’splainin’ to do about all those whacky “wise Latina” comments. It’s also come to light that she doesn’t think that the Second Amendment applies to states, which would mean that states and local governments could take a harder line on gun control than the feds. That’s a big deal. More important to me, however, is her position in Ricci and–even more important than the facts of that case–the deceitful manner in which she tried to deprive Ricci of his day in court. Americans can accept the decision of a judicial tribunal, but they can’t accept an arbitrary dismissal of a person’s claim. If one of her liberal collegues hadn’t read about her handling of the case in his local paper, the case would never have been heard by SCOTUS. Read about her conduct here because it’s not getting much publicity.
http://ninthjustice.nationaljournal.com/2009/07/how-ricci-almost.php
I urge everyone to read it (two pages printed out). For her conduct in Ricci, I think she’s scum, and no GOP senator should feel bad about voting against her–and no conservative Dem should feel bad about doing so either. SCOTUS shouldn’t have such deceitful members.
BuckeyeSam on July 11, 2009 at 12:50 PM
AnninCA on July 11, 2009 at 12:04 PM
Stating the evidence proving Sotomayor a racist is not reason to reaffirm the one with proof against Sotomayor a racist prop.
It is rational for the membership of a party to discuss their own leadership’s strengths and weaknesses.
maverick muse on July 11, 2009 at 12:50 PM
wall st journal ann
ginaswo on July 11, 2009 at 12:50 PM
I am still more then a little annoyed that publications pick the total antithesis of a conservatism to represent the non-liberal view point.
Cindy Munford on July 11, 2009 at 12:51 PM
Thanks for saving me from all that typing!
kongzilla on July 11, 2009 at 12:51 PM
a perfect sentence…….
Janos Hunyadi on July 11, 2009 at 12:52 PM
and as a recovered liberal Dem I say Sototmayor is totally a racist. She thinks people are different in their brains (think Return of the Living Dead here..BRAAAAINS) because of the amount of melatonin in their skin
she didnt even give Ricci a trial, go look at her work for PRLEGDEF…
RAAAAAAACIST!
ginaswo on July 11, 2009 at 12:52 PM
The media will put Noonan and Powell all day long. How often do we hear from conservative dems?
KBird on July 11, 2009 at 12:53 PM
and it would be racist to suggest GOP is treating Steele any certain way cause of his melatonin levels Ann.
I had enough of Ann at NoQuarter, sheesh!
Steele is incompetent!! he could be a rainbow of skittles and he is still incompetent!
ginaswo on July 11, 2009 at 12:53 PM
WSJ
Wall Street Journal
maverick muse on July 11, 2009 at 12:54 PM
right on buckeyesam!!! thanks for clarifying how the case went down since AnninCA just shoots with her mouth….
ginaswo on July 11, 2009 at 12:54 PM
I remember her ‘explaining’ to Katie Couric that she hadn’t travelled around Europe because she had to work to earn a living.
Novel concept, that. But then Couric, Noonan and all the rest of the snobs were probably sent to Europe for a year by mummy and daddy before or after college, all at the parents’ expense. And as if a year slumming around Europe when you’re 18 or 22 makes for a better national-level politician. The Noonans and Courics are so completely out of touch with normal people’s lives… they kinda remind me of Marie Antoinette, and it wouldn’t sadden me to see them go the same way.
ProfessorMiao on July 11, 2009 at 12:55 PM
Confirmation hearings should not be based on casual comments made at various professional organization meetings.
Period.
Focus on her record. The ONLY time personal stuff should be brought up is in the case of Thomas type scandals. Frankly, sexist *ssholes need not be appointed, regardless of race.
The attacks on Sotomayor are frivolous. I may annoy you by saying that, but at least I’m within the majority the public who agrees.
Let it go. We are sick and tired of seeing taxpayer dollars spent on this kind of junk. He’s the president. Like it or not, he gets to appoint Supreme Court nominees. Like it or not, he’s liberal. Like it or not, his appointee WILL be liberal.
And the right cannot complain. The stunt they pulled in the GORE/BUSH election over Florida clearly kicked the “politics don’t matter. they should be objective.” football RIGHT out of the park.
AnninCA on July 11, 2009 at 12:56 PM
All these Palin bashing idiots are doing is crying out for attention. Every time one of them writes something vicious they gain massive amounts of attention. They appear on talk shows, get massive traffic to their sites, and become part of the *cool bashing Palin club*. Dowd, Noonan, Purdum, etc.
I think we just need to ignore them moving forward. Not even respond to their moronic dribble. In fact, I say we boycott web site, paper or tv interview/show that features these assholes.
My first instinct is to want to attack back, like this article, but seriously, all I think it does is make them happy. Although, I do like the way Alec Baldwin went after Cafferty in this interview: (an example, not defending Baldwin on anything…. especially how the left ripped Palin’s education) but i like how he went after Cafferty personally, giving it back to him. That’s what these hacks deserve.
I ignore ALL things Olbermann, and my life is so much better. It’s like he doesn’t even exist, because I ignore him all the time. And so do a lot of other people, which is why his show is tanking.
sarainitaly on July 11, 2009 at 12:56 PM
last word for Ann, go look at your poll numbers again ’sweetie’ heh TOTUS what a buffoon he is, anywho Sototmayor is pulling Harriet Meyers numbers now, your polling data is OLD NEWS
Since Ricci and people learning about Ricci trhe tide ahs turned
she will be confirmed anyway cause she is the token hispanic cuz they wont count Cardozo he was too white looking I guess..
unreal
ginaswo on July 11, 2009 at 12:56 PM
Frank Ricci = Joe the Plumber.
BuckeyeSam on July 11, 2009 at 12:56 PM
Thanks! A classic! Made me laugh!
Loxodonta on July 11, 2009 at 12:56 PM
sorry dyslexia of the keyboard strikes!
ginaswo on July 11, 2009 at 12:56 PM
As often as we see unicorns, and for the same reason.
massrighty on July 11, 2009 at 12:57 PM
Yes . . . poor, poor Barry. He just never caught a break, did he? Born “off continent” — in that bleak, backwater, ghetto known as Oahu, Hawaii. Yes, mommy was a flake (who later went on to earn a Ph.D. in anthropology), but little Barry was guided by his sensible, no-nonsense grandma, a bank vice president (solid, working-class creds). Barry grew up in a condo in Hawaii, rubbing elbows with the local Liberal/Commie glitterati (Frank Marshall Davis), while attending the most expensive private school on Oahu (poor little guy!).
Barry graduated his expensive private H.S. and then attended Occidental College on the mainland, where he apparently did nothing to distinguish himself, other than smoking weed and snorting blow “when he could afford it” (oh, the deprivation!). After a couple of years, Barry transfers to Columbia University, yet another pricey private school. How did Barry qualify for this Ivy League school, with his less-than-stellar performance at Occidental? Did he use one of his natural “gifts” (such as his skin color)?
Barry apparently did better at Columbia (we can’t say for sure since he won’t release his school records), and then applied to Harvard Law. But . . . but . . . how will this poor, “unconnected” black kid get in? Perhaps as a legacy admission, since his Kenyan father was a Harvard alumnus? (Oops, we’re not supposed to mention stuff like that, right Peggy, because it spoils the Lib meme that Barry never had any help on the way up — stuff like that only happens to white guys named Bush). Or perhaps Barry used his natural “gift” again (being black in the U.S. — the gift that keeps on giving!).
Yes, it’s easy to see how Palin is the working-class poseur here. Just think of how many doors must have been opened to this white girl by her schoolteacher/soccer coach father and her secretary mother. People like that always have major connections! It’s just so unfair. How could poor little Barry, growing up in his Hawaiian condo and attending his elite, expensive private school, ever hope to compete with a girl with all of Palin’s advantages? And what kind of role models could little Barry’s bank-VP-granny and his Ph.D.-mommy and his Harvard-grad-student daddy have been??? Why it’s a miracle that little Barry even learned how to tie his own shoes! Think of all the hardships he had to overcome. Thank God he had all those guts and natural gifts to see him through, right Peggy?
AZCoyote on July 11, 2009 at 12:58 PM
oh Ann your liberal ignorance is showing again :0)
HER RECORD IS THE QUESTION
HER RACIST RECORD
and what they did to Alito IS A DISGRACE, HIS WIFE WAS IN TEARS
get your facts straight
ginaswo on July 11, 2009 at 12:58 PM
WSJ has begun to embrace the comment culture of blogworld, and the comments there ran about 95% negative on Peggy’s column. There were startlingly harsh and dismissive of Noonan.
I sort of figured that she would have some support in that environment, and that comments would be sophisticated and … sort of liberal, I guess. They most decidedly were not.
Jaibones on July 11, 2009 at 12:58 PM
Noonan clearly cannot fathom the appeal of Palin. While Obama’s ship is sinking, Palin’s continues to gain speed. Why not some thoughtful analysis into these opposing dynamics, rather than pointless ranting and hissy fits. All this irrational bitterness just puts me off.
littleguy on July 11, 2009 at 12:58 PM
Well, answer me. If it’s something obvious, I’ll laugh with you!
AnninCA on July 11, 2009 at 12:58 PM
Oh wait….Wall St. Journal?
AnninCA on July 11, 2009 at 12:59 PM
Peggy Noonan is a washed up old hag. She needs to write romance novels, but with her bitterness, she could ruin a romance novel. Please go to her website and take a look at the ancient glamour shot. What a fake!!!! Then, while at her website, give her an encouraging word. Ha!!!
mobydutch on July 11, 2009 at 1:00 PM
No argument from me. I agree. It’s destructive politics, and other than the Hill/Thomas hearings, which I did think were truly relevant, I agree.
And I don’t give a pass to the Dems. In fact, I read a very good article that Biden is really responsible for this type of smear politics.
I hate it. Don’t you?
AnninCA on July 11, 2009 at 1:00 PM
It was just what I call, “I’m headed out to my kid’s soccer game, but I have to deliver a column” type deal.
AnninCA on July 11, 2009 at 1:02 PM
Ann instead of using code like ‘moderate on social issues’ just say pro-abortion. Abortion is your pet issue as you and I know you have made a cottage industry out of justifying your past.
CWforFreedom on July 11, 2009 at 1:03 PM
I don’t see his appeal at all. He spits when he talks.
I do like Jon Stewart, until he tries to get serious. But his lampoons are usually funny. As a real pundit, Nah*….he’s a comedienne.
I like Ann Coulter, too. I think she’s wickedly funny, and she lampoons even better than Stewart does, on the reverse side.
AnninCA on July 11, 2009 at 1:04 PM
Hmmmm*….well, I don’t blame anyone for not “getting” me on that issue.
My position is that I’m done with it. I’m interested in many other issues, and I’m simply unwilling to vote based on a single issue.
AnninCA on July 11, 2009 at 1:06 PM
crr6 on July 11, 2009 at 12:36 PM
I don’t follow your line.
Danke
massrighty on July 11, 2009 at 12:38 PM
JiangxiDad on July 11, 2009 at 12:41 PM
schön
maverick muse on July 11, 2009 at 1:07 PM
The world is upside down. The Anns of the world just play along. Look at the life issue where life is not life and look at the race issue where Sotomayer’s racism is obvious but we cannot say so. Heck even look at the heat Rep. King took over stating the obvious in regards to Michael Jackson.
Truth, even the obvious , is not a friend of the left …or of Ann’s.
CWforFreedom on July 11, 2009 at 1:07 PM
When she gives talks and publishes articles about her judicial philosophy, it is part of her record as a jurist. She used the “wise latina” statement in several talks and at least one publication.
BTW, the numbers who think her appointment to the SCA is appropriate dropped enormously after the Ricci decision. Just as people don’t want to see someone denied a job just because they are black, Hispanic, Asian or whatever, nor do they want to see people denied a job only because they are NOT. Imagine that.
ProfessorMiao on July 11, 2009 at 1:08 PM
So many errors….
She’s made the “wise latina” comment, with variations, several times. It’s clearly part of her basic value system, and needs to be explored. Character and values certainly influence judicial temperment, and affect decisions. If she’d only said it once, it would have been OK to dismiss it as an off-the-cuff comment. Since it’s part of how she defines herself, it’s critical.
In the town you live in, there’s a big building full of books. Know the one I mean? It’s a library.
Go to it. Enter. Read at least two books about the Thomas confirmation hearings. Try to find one that condemns him, and one that supports him. When finished, you will find that there is a significant body of evidence that suggests that Thomas was not as he was portrayed.
Yeah, that whole winning, then winning the automatic recount, then winning every manual recount, then using the rule of law to prevent outrageous re-interpretations of the law thing. What were we thinking? How dastardly! Why, we should have just conceeded, right after Florida was called for Gore even while the polls were still open in western FL.
massrighty on July 11, 2009 at 1:09 PM
LOL you are far from done with it and in fact you have an infatuation.
CWforFreedom on July 11, 2009 at 1:10 PM
AZC – your comments nail Noonan’s idiotic mindset, but much more. You also expose the exact mindset of liberal America with that analysis.
I still remember my older daughter getting in a nasty argument with a black friend about affirmation action and being lectured by her white liberal teacher that the black guy “has already experienced more discrimination than you will in your entire life”.
The kid was a self-important, not too bright, and generally talentless musician from a more affluent family than ours, two parents at home, and he was accepted into Columbia. It’s not clear what the teacher was talking about, other than the bias and prejudice of his own worldview.
Like Obama, he will receive astonishing opportunities way outside of his own talent and effort. Affirmative action has created a world that mimics the world of trust-fund pansies.
Jaibones on July 11, 2009 at 1:10 PM
Confirmation hearings should not be based on casual comments made at various professional organization meetings.
Period.
Focus on her record. The ONLY time personal stuff should be brought up is in the case of Thomas type scandals. Frankly, sexist *ssholes need not be appointed, regardless of race.
The attacks on Sotomayor are frivolous. I may annoy you by saying that, but at least I’m within the majority the public who agrees.
Let it go. We are sick and tired of seeing taxpayer dollars spent on this kind of junk. He’s the president. Like it or not, he gets to appoint Supreme Court nominees. Like it or not, he’s liberal. Like it or not, his appointee WILL be liberal.
And the right cannot complain. The stunt they pulled in the GORE/BUSH election over Florida clearly kicked the “politics don’t matter. they should be objective.” football RIGHT out of the park.
AnninCA on July 11, 2009 at 12:56 PM
Feel free to echo the talking-points-memo explanation that she’s guilty of off-the-cuff misspeaking. No sale. In the 2001 speaking engagement, she memorialized it in a contemporaneous article. From what I understand, she’s repeated the theme several times. So, I’m not persuaded by your rationale.
As for the rest of the post, I’m speechless because I cannot even fathom what’s going on in your head. She’ll get confirmed, but she’ll go in with Harriet Miers popularity. You deal with that.
And please don’t forget that Dems are the ones who completely politicized judicial appointments dating back to Bork, Thomas, Roberts, and Alito. When Clinton offered eminently qualified liberal appointees–Ginsburg and Breyer, GOP senators were extraordinarily deferential. Look at votes. In contrast, Roberts and Alito and much better justices, and Dems voted against them in considerable numbers.
Forgive me, but the facts aren’t with you on anything you’ve written in your comments about judicial appointments. Have a good weekend. And stop whining about GOP scrutiny of Sotomayor. You’re watching MSNBC too much because your criticism is way overblown and simply unwarranted. And, as I said, Sotomayor’s favorability is tanking now that Americans are hearing about her role in Ricci.
BuckeyeSam on July 11, 2009 at 1:14 PM
You could be right. However, I’ve met so many incompetent white people from exactly the same circumstances, that I’d have to say, So?
It’s a case of personal observation, anyway, I think. I grew up in the Jim Crow South. I absolutely understand and can attest that racism was embedded in the society. It was NOT even close to being a fair deck of cards.
So I think one generation of tilting the other way makes sense.
I trust this will work out, probably after I’m long gone. But I really do trust that equality won that argument, that people are over the entire idea that being black means you’re inferior, and that we’re working through our own past.
And we will prevail. Our country was based on equality. Race and slavery is a defining issue. We fought a war over it.
And the right side of this country won.
AnninCA on July 11, 2009 at 1:15 PM
This might be one of the reason many here think you are a troll. Only about a month ago abortion was the only issue that mattered to you.
But you might just be a flake.
ProfessorMiao on July 11, 2009 at 1:15 PM
And, God willing, we on the right will win again.
Heh.
massrighty on July 11, 2009 at 1:17 PM
Peggy’s trolley is off the tracks, “our” own Maureen Dowd.
Maquis on July 11, 2009 at 1:17 PM
Thanks. Nice post. I left mention of Thomas and Bush v. Gore out because anyone spouting that is unserious. I thought to myself, “Yikes.”
BuckeyeSam on July 11, 2009 at 1:18 PM
I don’t know who Doctor Zero is but this is one of the wittiest, best written, right on the money columns I have read in the blogosphere or anywhere else this year. Great job and let’s hear more!
DaMav on July 11, 2009 at 1:18 PM
I think Peggy needs to go to hell.
Clearly she is part of the problem.
gdonovan on July 11, 2009 at 1:18 PM
Hello! Anybody home? Resent people that look down on the middle class because they wear jeans and didn’t attend Ivy League schools? Guilty!
kongzilla on July 11, 2009 at 1:20 PM
You’re entitled to your opinion. I find blogging to be a bit of a personal challenge.
If I answer every blog with a complete discourse on my thinking, it’s just too darn heavy!
Going with the flow…..too superficial!
I will say this. I’m very much a “student of politics” type.
Not a pundit.
And I change my mind. So take what you like, leave the rest.
AnninCA on July 11, 2009 at 1:22 PM
Thanks Buckeye, and back at you! – I love using reason and logic (the sharpest of knives) to puncture weak argument.
massrighty on July 11, 2009 at 1:23 PM
Palin just wasn’t having anything to do with the stupid Couric question about what do you read. Anyway she answered, there would have been mocking. Would Couric have expected ONE™ to have sounded off with a laundry list of papers and periodicals?
Palin is a Governor. I am sure she has staff who provide daily clippings from many different publications. To actually think she doesn’t read, is just so damn moronic.
PC14 on July 11, 2009 at 1:24 PM
I have nothing but Contempt for Noonan, Parker, and the host of other obama groveling so called conservative journalist.
Kini on July 11, 2009 at 1:25 PM
There seems to be 100% agreement on this blog.
More Doctor Zero.
And Doctor, if you are willing – tell us a little about yourself!
massrighty on July 11, 2009 at 1:25 PM
Peggy Noonan is more worried about being accepted by the “right” kind of people than adhering to any coherent politicial philosophy. She’s the execrable social climber that we all knew in high school, fifty years forward.
Why anyone gives a rat’s ass about what she scribbles is beyond me.
Cicero43 on July 11, 2009 at 1:25 PM
I’m still confused Ann. You voted for McCain, but not for Palin? You said earlier you’re now curious about Palin, and want to know more about her, as if you might vote for her someday. It would seem to me you already did.
JiangxiDad on July 11, 2009 at 1:30 PM
Noonan reminds me of Karen Armstrong, slobbering, groveling, felatrix or apologist for Islam…I refuse to take her seriously, since, for all her glowing back patting of the House of Saud, she still hasn’t converted. Why? Noonan is the same. Convert already, and shut up. I no longer read her crap. Thanks for doing it for us Zero.
Jewel on July 11, 2009 at 1:30 PM
Noonan once described herself in a column as coming from Irish-Catholic Democrat roots. Her political sympathies never really left what was once that party’s philosophy.
I stopped reading Noonan very early into Bush’s second term because her catty criticisms appeared to be inspired by the fact that she was not invited to the WH table at that time. Like Murtha, whose opinion was not sought, she sought her revenge at the snub with the tools that each had.
Doctor Zero, you nailed Noonan quite well for the shallowness of her criticisms and snottiness…although I will tell you that Noonan did not commit the sin of a run-on sentence.
It’s obvious that Noonan never familiarized herself with the demonstrably solid achievements that Gov. Palin effected in her short time as governor nor in the political offices that she held before that point.
Noonan bought into the tabloid version and media “elites” version of Palin early on and continues to trumpet it through her position at the WSJ. Noonan demonstrates irresponsible journalism, offering up boilerplate. She would have been wiser to visit Alaska or done some beyond-the-surface research or attended a Palin political rally to ahear actually the conservative ideas that Palin was championing.
Noonan’s blind support of Obama has all of the qualities of a swooning teenager. She celebrates a personality not a leader worthy of the American people.
onlineanalyst on July 11, 2009 at 1:31 PM
Reading Dr.Z criticise Noonans’punctuation, while defending SP is downright hilarious (have you heard SP speak, as such?)
And suggesting SP write a column for the journal is sidesplitting.What has she actually written, ever?
The Journal doesn’t allow ghostwriters for their columnists.
Perhaps a comic strip? you betcha!
greataunty on July 11, 2009 at 1:33 PM
My position is that Noonan and others who are labeling Sarah as lightweight could be right.
My position is that the media hasn’t really explored this fairly or given her a chance to grow.
I have stated before, I was a huge Clinton fan. I think he was a brilliant politician and statesman. He worked well with a Republican congress, in spite of the right-wing attacks, and he passed and vetoed with aplomb.
Would she do the same?
Her quitting raises one question in my mind. Is she capable of really fending off attacks?
That is absolutely necessary to accomply anything, whether you are trying to pass a more liberal agenda or a more conservative one.
The country is toast on drama.
The media is still chasing it, but the real people keep turning off the TV rather than even invite that into their living rooms.
Ratings are plunging.
So, the next real interest will be someone who is NOT all about drama, Jon and Kate stuff, etc. I’m convinced, the public is toast on that stuff.
AnninCA on July 11, 2009 at 1:34 PM
Only MORRON like Peggy Noonan saw the ” HOPE & CHANGE”in Obama’s presidency. If she had any intelligence, she would have read the writing on the wall about Obama!!! Conservative were screaming, banging the walls to wake up the sleeping, mesmerised and Brain washed nation about coming OBAMA CALMITY!!!They were trying their best to expose TRUE OBAMA”. But Peggy was to busy ” Slurrping up the HONEY off of Obama’s Bumpers”. Now she has an Audacity to lecture Conservative Republicans??!! “TRUE MORRON”
deeshant48 on July 11, 2009 at 1:35 PM
I think it’s great when people take the time to learn more about an issue and to think things through. If someone changes his mind as a result of that, good.
But you haven’t done that. A month or so ago, you said that abortion was the bottom line issue for you. You’ve never said you had a change of heart (or would it be opinion), or explained why you now think differently. You just announce now that it doesn’t matter to you anymore and expect everybody to take you at your word. In another month, maybe it will be your most important issue again.
You shouldn’t be surprised that nobody takes you seriously.
ProfessorMiao on July 11, 2009 at 1:36 PM
AnninCA is hijacking the this thread again. The topic is Noonan and or Palin. Everything else is informal fallacies of which are Ann’s statements that appear unrelated to the topic at hand.
Americannodash on July 11, 2009 at 1:36 PM
Who did you vote for VP in ‘08?
JiangxiDad on July 11, 2009 at 1:39 PM
My vote was for McCain. I didn’t have any problem with her as VP. So my vote was for her as VP. I still think she was as qualified as Biden.
I never bought into the comparison between her and Obama.
That was ageism.
Everyone talking that way didn’t admit, they thought McCain was too old.
I did honestly think that was an issue, and I thought he had a chance to really address it…but he refused to do so.
He could have said, I’ll only stay for 4 years.
He chose not to do that, for his own reasons. That put the age issue back into play.
And I do not excuse Sarah, btw, for not anticipating that meant she would be the target.
John was too old. He was the “give-away” candidate in a year when the GOP was so unpopular, the Pope would have lost.
She agreed to run. She can complain about the tactics, but up to a point. At that point, I think she’s just not making sense.
I support her about attacks on her kids. I support her on the attacks on Alaska.
But she also needs to move on.
AnninCA on July 11, 2009 at 1:40 PM
Thanks, havent seen these old stale talking points for almost a whole day.
Peggy has positioned herself as a writer, by profession. Therefore, criticism based on form is OK.
What has she written? Seems she’s been busy doing other things.
You are dis-allowing ghostwritten work? Excellent. This clears the shelves of any work by a Clinton. Or a Kennedy.
Is your post boring, and unoriginal? You betcha!
massrighty on July 11, 2009 at 1:40 PM
Sorry, sorry.
I never intend to do this.
I’ll bow out.
AnninCA on July 11, 2009 at 1:41 PM
Another point that discredits Noonan is that she never went beyond the media narrative of Obama that his campaign spun about him. Noonan displays an incredible incuriosity about Obama’s lackluster political career prior to his presidential run and his questionable political alliances and influences all along. She never raised any questions about all of the secrecy and lack of a paper trail about the phenomenon who arose out of nowhere to become a celebrity president.
onlineanalyst on July 11, 2009 at 1:41 PM
Let’s meet again, on a different thread.
My explanation? If I explain too much, it’s too heavy?
It’s proving true.
I’m now “hijacking” the thead.
I really am not wanting to do that.
We’ll have plenty of other opportunities.
Ciao.
AnninCA on July 11, 2009 at 1:44 PM
Thank you.
Loxodonta on July 11, 2009 at 1:46 PM
We don’t need a smarter policy wonk, Noonan.
This is like the big mouth accountant in his cube saying how his Harvard MBA qualifies him to run the company better than that stupid CEO.
Miss it Noonan…. miss it.
jeff_from_mpls on July 11, 2009 at 1:50 PM
Yeah, sorry guys. I should know better…
ProfessorMiao on July 11, 2009 at 1:51 PM
.
Your welcome Lox.
Americannodash on July 11, 2009 at 1:53 PM
Great post – you have a golden tongue. I agree that Sarah writing for the WSJ would be a major improvement over Pegs.
Oh, yeah – this line:
“Obama couldn’t articulate the principles of conservatism if Thomas Sowell hacked into his teleprompter and fed him the words.”
Gold!!!
KS Rex on July 11, 2009 at 1:53 PM
Peggy, Peggy, Peggy…Go do something really important, do lunch with AnninCA, who lives in Rio Linda…so much to discuss together.
“Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.” – Abraham Lincoln
luvstotango on July 11, 2009 at 1:55 PM
Peggy does not engage in debate, or use critical thinking, or provide relevant evidence, or even stay on topic. She merely attempts to use her provocative and beguiling smooth talk to hijack the Republican Party from it’s base.
Noonan has come to betray Reagan, not to praise him.
Loxodonta on July 11, 2009 at 1:58 PM
As usual, a great piece. Summed it up perfectly, thank you for your hard work.
True_King on July 11, 2009 at 1:58 PM
Peggy long ago sold her soul and credibility by actually accepting money from MSNBC for her musings. How dare she question anyone’s intelligence when she engages in “intellectual” debate with Chris Matthews
and Keith Olberman and still comes up lacking? She repelled me long ago with her phony persona and “I gotta tell yas” while she removes her glasses and tosses her hair. If the requirement for initiation into the cool fraternity where Barry and “Champ” are the leaders, then no thanks, Peg. I don’t need “ya” to tell me anything and I sure don’t take “ya”
seriously.
Spunky06 on July 11, 2009 at 1:59 PM
Why do we bother with “noonan”? Why don’t we throw her opinion in the trash heap of DPM (dem propoganda media) types? That is clearly where she belongs and where she resides.
lwssdd on July 11, 2009 at 2:00 PM
Are you mad? The reason GOP establishment is attacking her so viciously is because she is a lock in the primaries. IF she runs, she wins the nom. Others don’t even have to submit their papers. That’s why the beltway gang is attacking her so viciously 3/12 years before the election.
New Gingrcih, David Frum etc all conceded that she’ll be the nominee for 2012.
promachus on July 11, 2009 at 2:12 PM
Peggy Noonan is a class A hypocrite, she begs readers to understand that keeping the story on Palin is the MSM goal while she does the same herself. She lauds the thinking of Biden? and Obama while she disses Palin. Finally, she made me want to scream when she threw fuel on the fire with Palin during the election, she has lost her credibility as a messenger to conservatives she directs her message to in this article.
That said, Palin is perfectly entitled to find a new role as speaker, author etc to promote conservative ideals. She has lost credibility with me as a candidate for 2012, though, by resigning her office because of media and legal attacks. The media will be relentless on anyone opposing Obama and those attacks would not cease if Palin were to win. By her own standards she would need to resign as this will surely continue as President. She would have showed her A game if she found a way to complete her stay in office and beat the media at their game. In all honesty there were times she played into their hands rather than outsmart them.
Whoever takes over after Obama will have an enormous mess to clean up. They will need to do that while withstanding withering attacks from the media. I will not underestimate Palin’s ability to carve a role for herself on the national scene including higher office. As for 2012 though, she should be wise enough to know that she needs to pass the ball and let someone else take on Obama.
msmveritas on July 11, 2009 at 2:18 PM
It amazes me to no end that Noonan has such a command of our english language. Peggy Noonan with all her gifts still won’t or can’t write in terminologies of Reaganism that once propelled her into the conservatism spotlight so long ago. Noonan no longer persuades me with her writings. Sad really because she was a real comer at one time. Oh well, thank goodness we have Doctor Zero.
Americannodash on July 11, 2009 at 2:21 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »