Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Whom do you trust?

posted at 12:41 pm on July 10, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

If Barack Obama has reason to worry about sliding poll numbers, the Democrats as a party might shortly enter panic mode.  In the space of a few months, they have tossed aside their credibility on most of the issues, according to a Rasmussen poll, including their onetime strong suit, the economy.  Now Republicans have overtaken them on eight of ten issues, and threaten to eclipse them on health care and education as well:

Voters now trust Republicans more than Democrats on eight out of 10 key electoral issues, including, for the second straight month, the top issue of the economy. They’ve also narrowed the gap on the remaining two issues, the traditionally Democratic strong suits of health care and education.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that voters trust the GOP more on economic issues 46% to 41%, showing little change from the six-point lead the party held last month. This is just the second time in over two years of polling the GOP has held the advantage on economic issues. The parties were close on the issue in May, with the Democrats holding a one-point lead.

Voters not affiliated with either party trust Republicans more to handle the economy by a 46% to 32% margin.

That last point is the big takeaway.  For decades, the Democrats have led on the economy, mostly by being on the outside of power in DC.  They promise boatloads of benefits without explaining the costs, and demonize Republicans for exercising fiscal responsibility (occasions that had admittedly become rare) through anecdotal stories of people ignored by the government.  Now that they hold all the strings, the costs for their expansive and overwhelming agenda can no longer remain hidden, and people — most critically independents — are reeling away from the Democrats.

The data on health care and education show how poorly the Democrats have performed.  On both questions, their overall edge falls in the margin of error in the polling; education, Democrats lead by three points (41%-38%) and on health care, four points (46%-42%).  On Social Security, the gap goes to 42%-37% GOP, with independents evenly split.  In Ethics in Government, the results have gone back to a statistical tie, with the GOP up by a point (34%-33%).  A majority of independents are not sure, which gives an indication of how far both parties have fallen on that measure.

But the economy is the bellwether of Democratic woes in 2010.  Men trust the GOP more by a 14-point margin (52%-38%) while women provide a statistical dead heat (43%-42% Democrat).  That suggests that so-called soccer moms may provide a big backlash to Democrats simply by erasing the gender gap at the polls in the midterms.  Among age demographics, only the youngest voters trust Democrats more than Republicans, and only by a 45%-36% margin.  Voters under $40K per year trust Democrats more, but the voters in all other income demographics trust Republicans, with a 63%-26% split among those earning $75K-$100K.

The political class question is most revealing.  Those who consider themselves apart from the political class trust Republicans more on the economy by a wide margin (58%-28%), while those inside the political class support Democrats … 99%-1%.  No, that is not a typo.  It’s a demonstration of the slavish devotion to Democrats within the political class, and the breakout indicates that the Democrats have more trouble than even this poll shows on voter trust.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

But the adults are in charge.

lorien1973 on July 10, 2009 at 12:42 PM

I trust no party with either my rights or my freedom. To trust the State is to invite tyranny.

OhEssYouCowboys on July 10, 2009 at 12:44 PM

Nice to see the rest of the country catching up with us!

mike in NV on July 10, 2009 at 12:44 PM

But can this be translated into votes??? How could all these people be so utterly stupid in 2006 and 2008 yet all the sudden “get it”?

What’s got the mo shifting back?

Thunderstorm129 on July 10, 2009 at 12:44 PM

Trust is earned. Not given.

But not many people think about that.

upinak on July 10, 2009 at 12:45 PM

Funny how losing your job while seeing your taxes raised through the roof, and all this AFTER being told that spending a trillion dollars will keep such things from happening, will alter your opinion.

Bishop on July 10, 2009 at 12:45 PM

What’s got the mo shifting back?

Thunderstorm129 on July 10, 2009 at 12:44 PM

You have to ask, really?

Too bad the RNC is virtually silent on what’s going on. I -still- think they like this big government stuff and are biding their time till they get to hold all the new powers.

lorien1973 on July 10, 2009 at 12:45 PM

If the Repubs would take a “NO PORK” pledge and act Conservatively, we could have a blowout in 2010 and
hopefully turn back all of this BS socialism / marxism

ReaganConservative3 on July 10, 2009 at 12:45 PM

So, giving trillions of dollar to your friends and allies upsets people? How could Baracky have known? The serfs said they wanted change right?

18-1 on July 10, 2009 at 12:46 PM

The bubble is bursting and the air is exploding out the tires of the Obama Regime.

This is the moment of truth… Will these people acquiesce to the will of the people, accept accountability in 2010 and 2012 if they don’t change course?

Or are the tanks about to start rolling over civilians?

Don’t laugh. There is nothing Obama has done yet that suggests that he isn’t an enemy of democracy and a lover of totalitarianism, from his National Socialist economic policies to his love for foreign thugs and disdain when a country gets rid of one.

wildcat84 on July 10, 2009 at 12:46 PM

Hmmmm, let me see, what are the choices?

d1carter on July 10, 2009 at 12:48 PM

This is the exact reason Obozo is trying to shove everything down our throats now. 2010 will not be kind to the dims and I can’t wait!!!

txag92 on July 10, 2009 at 12:48 PM

Ed, how does Rasmussen define the “political class” in their poll? I’m curious as to how it’s 99-1 for the Dems. I’m assuming it includes the media?

Special K on July 10, 2009 at 12:48 PM

What’s got the mo shifting back?

Thunderstorm129 on July 10, 2009 at 12:44 PM

You have to ask, really?

Too bad the RNC is virtually silent on what’s going on. I -still- think they like this big government stuff and are biding their time till they get to hold all the new powers.

lorien1973 on July 10, 2009 at 12:45 PM

I understand the obvious reason, being Obama’s wrecking of the economy, but my question is more on the lines of democrats are for big government and big spending so if all these people voted for them in ‘06 and ‘08, why now the shock and surprise and the swing back in the other direction?

Maybe it’s just me saying “we told you so” but I still wonder how people could rapidly abandon a ship now that they willingly set foot on not so long ago knowing it was taking on water.

Thunderstorm129 on July 10, 2009 at 12:49 PM

only the youngest voters trust Democrats more than Republicans, and only by a 45%-36% margin. Voters under $40K per year trust Democrats more,

they are still expecting their free gas, free mortgage and all the other freebies from Uncle Sam

cmsinaz on July 10, 2009 at 12:49 PM

In God we trust, all others pay cash.

Daggett on July 10, 2009 at 12:50 PM

Voters under $40K per year trust Democrats more

Aka the gimme-gimme-gimme demographic.

BuckeyeSam on July 10, 2009 at 12:50 PM

Unless there’s a significant shift, and the Republicans actually propose ideas, I don’t see the shift affecting the election. Unhappiness doesn’t mean change, it just means opportunity for it.

jdfister on July 10, 2009 at 12:50 PM

If the Repubs would take a “NO PORK” pledge and act Conservatively, we could have a blowout in 2010

ReaganConservative3 on July 10, 2009 at 12:45 PM

They need to drop a new Contract With America two months before midterm elections.

John the Libertarian on July 10, 2009 at 12:51 PM

Voters under $40K per year trust Democrats more,

That is why Obama has to destroy the economy. Once you depend on government handouts you become a slave to the government.

fourdeucer on July 10, 2009 at 12:51 PM

Polls like this one or Obamas popularity mean little because with the MSM in their pockets, all they need is a week or two of good press, even it’s it all lies, and the idiots in this country will once again embrace Obama and Pelosi.

Jeff from WI on July 10, 2009 at 12:52 PM

But can this be translated into votes??? How could all these people be so utterly stupid in 2006 and 2008 yet all the sudden “get it”?

What’s got the mo shifting back?

Thunderstorm129 on July 10, 2009 at 12:44 PM

A fellow named Hussein helped shift the country one way, and now a fellow named Hussein is putting it back. I believe that’s called “symmetry”.

LibTired on July 10, 2009 at 12:52 PM

In 2006 the Dems sold a bill of goods listing the price as ‘Free’…we saw the bill in 2008 when the economy crashed but the dems spun the party line to ratchet up the promises…more free stuff for all, no tax increases except for the evil rich, and a workers paradise for all. Today we see double digit unemployment in a host of democrat strongholds, deficits beyond imagining, and zero, as in no ‘free’ anything. It is also clear to anyone paying any attention at all that the dem leadership are liars of the first water.

Put another way, the folk with their grasping hands out for goodies stolen from others are still standing with their hands out….and are realizing their paws will never be filled with the wealth of others. They are turning on their masters…

JIMV on July 10, 2009 at 12:52 PM

Is there any opportunity for the Democrats to improve things before 2010? 2012?

My fear is that they now employ the “let’s make things utterly horrible, then fix them and act like we didn’t make it horrible in the first place” tactic. I mean, they’d say it with a straight face. They’ve already proven a willingness to do that.

Thunderstorm129 on July 10, 2009 at 12:52 PM

they are still expecting their free gas, free mortgage and all the other freebies from Uncle Sam

cmsinaz on July 10, 2009 at 12:49 PM

And they are being organized and funded by numerous Soros-backed groups….and the media. We aren’t out of the woods yet.

genso on July 10, 2009 at 12:53 PM

Polls like this one or Obamas popularity mean little because with the MSM in their pockets, all they need is a week or two of good press, even it’s it all lies, and the idiots in this country will once again embrace Obama and Pelosi.

Jeff from WI on July 10, 2009 at 12:52 PM

No one has embraced Pelosi for a long time. I mean that figuratively and literally.

LibTired on July 10, 2009 at 12:53 PM

Among age demographics, only the youngest voters trust Democrats more than Republicans, and only by a 45%-36% margin.

Thirty years from now, they’ll view Obama as so many from 45 to 60 now view Carter.

BuckeyeSam on July 10, 2009 at 12:53 PM

Murdoch says Obama could lose the press by the end of the year! I hope it is true, then we can all turn on the press after they turn on him!

JAM on July 10, 2009 at 12:53 PM

Heh.

There’s a couple of wanna-be ACORN members that work with my son. They constantly gripe about “where’s my check Obama was going to send me?”. Even they will eventually “get it”.

What? I said eventually.

Guardian on July 10, 2009 at 12:54 PM

What is exactly is does the “political class” mean?

ProfessorMiao on July 10, 2009 at 12:54 PM

Those who consider themselves apart from the political class trust Republicans more on the economy by a wide margin (58%-28%), while those inside the political class support Democrats … 99%-1%. No, that is not a typo.

Everyone must toe the party line, no matter how insipid it sounds.

Vashta.Nerada on July 10, 2009 at 12:55 PM

I trust ‘em as far as I can throw ‘em.

ornery_independent on July 10, 2009 at 12:56 PM

That suggests that so-called soccer moms may provide a big backlash to Democrats simply by erasing the gender gap at the polls in the midterms.

The “mother bear effect” is going to be brutal.

forest on July 10, 2009 at 12:56 PM

I note people are asking about Republicans…so far the only thing the republicans have done to effect these numbers is NOT support the dems. We have little leadership and our RINO’s, who usually get a lot of media face time, are now redundant in the 60 Seat dem senate so, they are not on TV diluting our message.

If we had real leadership we would destroy the left next year. As it is we rely on them destroying themselves…while we watch.

JIMV on July 10, 2009 at 12:57 PM

There’s a couple of wanna-be ACORN members that work with my son. They constantly gripe about “where’s my check Obama was going to send me?”. Even they will eventually “get it”.

What? I said eventually.

Guardian on July 10, 2009 at 12:54 PM

I don’t think so. These people are Bolsheviks. And, just like so many Bolsheviks who were rounded up and sent to the Lubyanka, the gulag or the grave – they refused to believe that Father Stalin has earmarked them for destruction. They were incapable of discerning reality.

These people are apparatchiks, through and through.

OhEssYouCowboys on July 10, 2009 at 12:57 PM

What is exactly is does the “political class” mean?

ProfessorMiao on July 10, 2009 at 12:54 PM

I think it’s polite way of saying “douchebags”.

forest on July 10, 2009 at 12:57 PM

It’s the ECONOMY, stupid. This is the first time in a generation we’ve gone through a genuinely BAD economic period (as opposed to the mild recessions of 1992 and 2001). Last time this happened, Carter got run out of town on a rail after one term, in one of the worst landslide losses by an incumbent President in history.

What Obama is hanging his future on is that by 2012 the recession will either be over or he’s locked down “El Presidente For Life” (which HAS to be a worry given his stand on Honduras). The former isn’t going to happen as long as his current policies remain in place, and the latter won’t happen without revolution and civil war.

But for the congressional Dems the day of reckoning comes much sooner, 2010. They are going to HAVE to start opposing the more destructive policies of the Obama Regime if they are going to have ANY chance of not seeing major, MAJOR midterm losses, because the only way for them to get re-elected is an improved economy. This can only be achieved if Obama’s policies are stopped.

Reid and Pelosi have to choose between throwing Obama under the bus or being thrown under Obama’s bus.

wildcat84 on July 10, 2009 at 12:58 PM

I don’t hear the Hollywood morons commenting latly about their beloved “saviour”. What’s up with that? Are Penn and Sarandon at a loss for words? Love it!!

rook105 on July 10, 2009 at 12:58 PM

The “mother bear effect” is going to be brutal.

forest on July 10, 2009 at 12:56 PM

Especially when mother bear can’t afford new soccer cleats b/c she has to pay the exorbitant heating bill!

JAM on July 10, 2009 at 12:58 PM

I wouldn’t trust the Democrats to tell me the time of day.

Sadly, though, I don’t much trust the Republicans on anything either.

We’re going to have to take our party to one of those trust building ropes courses to strengthen the relationship.

myrenovations on July 10, 2009 at 12:59 PM

***

There’s a couple of wanna-be ACORN members that work with my son. They constantly gripe about “where’s my check Obama was going to send me?”. Even they will eventually “get it”.

What? I said eventually.

Guardian on July 10, 2009 at 12:54 PM

Of course, when they do “get it,” they’ll simply stop showing up at the voting booth. Sure, that’ll help in elections. But they’ll always be looking for the next Obama–some savior to come along and promise them more free stuff.

BuckeyeSam on July 10, 2009 at 12:59 PM

Aka the gimme-gimme-gimme demographic.

BuckeyeSam on July 10, 2009 at 12:50 PM

Clarification…….It’s the “Where’s mines?” demographic.

/sarc

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on July 10, 2009 at 12:59 PM

d, how does Rasmussen define the “political class” in their poll? I’m curious as to how it’s 99-1 for the Dems. I’m assuming it includes the media?

I was polled by Zogby a few days ago and they asked that specific question…’do you consider yourself a member of the political class’….I said no as that label has a certain whiff of corruption right now.

JIMV on July 10, 2009 at 12:59 PM

while those inside the political class support Democrats … 99%-1%.

Woah.
Is that an indication of party affiliation of the “political class”?

Count to 10 on July 10, 2009 at 12:59 PM

If the Repubs would take a “NO PORK” pledge and act Conservatively, we could have a blowout in 2010
ReaganConservative3 on July 10, 2009 at 12:45 PM

If only, sigh. I haven’t seen anybody take a Newt role and put something in writing for 2010 elections.

cozmo on July 10, 2009 at 1:00 PM

Here’s a link to Rasmussen which defines the political class. I think it’s a little vague, but the bottom line is that the political class are those who trust government to be better equipped to solve problems than the “common man” can.

Special K on July 10, 2009 at 1:01 PM

No one has embraced Pelosi for a long time. I mean that figuratively and literally.

LibTired on July 10, 2009 at 12:53 PM

Calling blatantblue!!!

Fortunata on July 10, 2009 at 1:01 PM

Those who consider themselves apart from the political class trust Republicans more on the economy by a wide margin (58%-28%), while those inside the political class support Democrats … 99%-1%.

If this number is correct, its amazing that there is even such thing as a Republican politician. Mostly, by nature they’re freaks (Craig, Sanford, Ensign) or watered-down Democrats (just about everyone else).

Cicero43 on July 10, 2009 at 1:02 PM

Neither party is going to bring us out of this mess. Washington has grown into a money-sucking, influence-peddling beast that corrupts anyone who works there.

The way out is to starve the beast. That town must be dismantled as the source of money and power in this country if we are to ever regain our status as a fiscally responsible, productive powerhouse.

Unfortunately at this point it’s only happening in two ways. Governmental collapse, or the torch, pitchfork, and shotgun crowd. The first option won’t be pleasant since it involves taxpayers getting fleeced even more while seeing the returns on it dwindle, the second might be gratifying on a primal level but it will make us no better than the people who engineered the French Revolution.

So either we get to eat shit, or we get to eat chocolate-covered shit.

TheMightyMonarch on July 10, 2009 at 1:02 PM

forest on July 10, 2009 at 12:57 PM

+++++++

LibTired on July 10, 2009 at 1:02 PM

I don’t hear the Hollywood morons commenting latly about their beloved “saviour”. What’s up with that? Are Penn and Sarandon at a loss for words? Love it!!

rook105 on July 10, 2009 at 12:58 PM

And once again, the Hollywood morons champion their cause and chastise those who oppose as racist, homophobic, redneck, fly-over, uneducated, etc, folks. And once again, their champion turns out to be a turd polished to look like a winner. But he’s still a turd.

If you expect to hear any apologies from Hollywood, don’t hold your breath. They’ll sweep his crap Presidency down the memory-hole while looking for the next faux-outrage to champion and come down on the wrong side of.

Thunderstorm129 on July 10, 2009 at 1:02 PM

But of course the Democrats are honest and open, after all they can stand in front of a podium that says “Honest Leadership”, “Open Government”, so it must be true.

kirkill on July 10, 2009 at 1:03 PM

A conversation with a 22yo co-worker:

“Why doesn’t the President just make a law?”

“Because he can’t make law. That is for Congress to do.”

“Then it is law?”

“Not if the President vetoes it.”

“What is that?”

“Not sign the bill.”

“The courts could make him.”

“No, the courts can invalidate a law based on the constitution but they can’t write law.”

“Bullshiit”.

“It is called checks and balances.”

“No wonder our country is so FdUpd.”

——

Yes, no wonder indeed.

Limerick on July 10, 2009 at 1:03 PM

Maybe it’s just me saying “we told you so” but I still wonder how people could rapidly abandon a ship now that they willingly set foot on not so long ago knowing it was taking on water.

Thunderstorm129 on July 10, 2009 at 12:49 PM

That’s my take as well. Several possibilities:

-people are dumb as stumps, and don’t know what they’re doing from one day to the next.

-the media is doing a bad job protecting his mistakes.

-Obama only looked good in comparison to the false vision of Bush and McCain the media created. Both are gone as issues.

The left has no bogeyman at the moment–not even Rush. Obama is alone, and things suck. Watch for the admin/media to go after someone VERY SOON. Palin? Who?

JiangxiDad on July 10, 2009 at 1:03 PM

Whom do you trust?

Neither party.

FloatingRock on July 10, 2009 at 1:04 PM

So either we get to eat shit, or we get to eat chocolate-covered shit.

TheMightyMonarch on July 10, 2009 at 1:02 PM

Well put. Personally, I’m on a strict no-BS diet from now on.

genso on July 10, 2009 at 1:04 PM

Of course, when they do “get it,” they’ll simply stop showing up at the voting booth. Sure, that’ll help in elections. But they’ll always be looking for the next Obama–some savior to come along and promise them more free stuff.

BuckeyeSam on July 10, 2009 at 12:59 PM

They won’t get it. The horse stops moving if he actually gets the carrot.

Thunderstorm129 on July 10, 2009 at 1:04 PM

Without a strawman, Obama is visible to people for first time.

JiangxiDad on July 10, 2009 at 1:05 PM

Sheesh, I had to pay my mortgage AGAIN, this month. When will it ever end?!

kirkill on July 10, 2009 at 1:06 PM

Yes, no wonder indeed.

Limerick on July 10, 2009 at 1:03 PM

I hope you killed him.

JiangxiDad on July 10, 2009 at 1:06 PM

I think people are missing the real reason for Obama and the dems slide in the last couple of weeks. And that is forgien policy. Americians by at least a 70-30% view Castro, chavez, Kadaffi, and Iran as our enemies. Not are friends. To see Obama and the dems siding with our enemies is to give the Americian people pause. and if Obama embraces Castro and Chavez how hard is it to believe that he is a marxist. If you are being painted by your political opponents as a socialist/marxist one would think you have enough brains to not embrace other admited marxists as friends. Obama’s forgein policy is making it easy to paint him as a marxist and once you see Obama in that one of course you are not going to trust him with the economy or any other issue.

unseen on July 10, 2009 at 1:06 PM

‘10 dem re-election talking point:

“President Obama was far more left than we had thought. Re-elect us and we will keep him in check.”

‘10 Rep re-election talking point:

“President Obama was far more left than we thought. Elect us and we will keep him in check.”

portlandon on July 10, 2009 at 1:07 PM

The left has no bogeyman at the moment–not even Rush. Obama is alone, and things suck. Watch for the admin/media to go after someone VERY SOON. Palin? Who?

JiangxiDad on July 10, 2009 at 1:03 PM

Plain is the low-hanging fruit for them. Beck, maybe. I say we have another crisis thrown at us. Maybe international.

genso on July 10, 2009 at 1:07 PM

They need to drop a new Contract With America two months before midterm elections.

John the Libertarian on July 10, 2009 at 12:51 PM

Yes, and pressure the candidates to pledge YEA or NAY on each item, item by item.

petefrt on July 10, 2009 at 1:07 PM

unseen on July 10, 2009 at 1:06 PM

Hasn’t been a good month for Hugo Obama.

JiangxiDad on July 10, 2009 at 1:07 PM

But of course the Democrats are honest and open, after all they can stand in front of a podium that says “Honest Leadership”, “Open Government”, so it must be true.

kirkill on July 10, 2009 at 1:03 PM

LOL, you made me choke on my sandwich!

scalleywag on July 10, 2009 at 1:08 PM

The fact that no Republicans are not out taking advantage of these polls is depressing. As a conservative I just assume that if they were back in the majority the would be “curing” our problems in the same way, spending. Either there are no conservatives left or the Republicans would find their a$$ with both hands.

Cindy Munford on July 10, 2009 at 1:09 PM

Obama only looked good in comparison to the false vision of Bush and McCain the media created. Both are gone as issues.

The left has no bogeyman at the moment–not even Rush. Obama is alone, and things suck.
JiangxiDad on July 10, 2009 at 1:03 PM

I think that might be it. And also a sad, sad commentary on the new “openly partisan” press and the affect they will have on the elections from here on out (unless they all go bankrupt or someone with some integrity decides to go back to reporting without bias).

Thunderstorm129 on July 10, 2009 at 1:09 PM

The numbers have shaken the Democrats up. That’s why the pause in pushing Crap and Tax and ObamaCare. They can’t fudge the numbers, and the numbers are what are scaring the hell out of people.

The economy will be the deciding factor in 2010. Hopefully there will be a Democratic blood bath. And it can all be laid at the feet of Obama, Pelosi and Reid.

GarandFan on July 10, 2009 at 1:09 PM

In the space of a few months, they have tossed aside their credibility on most of the issues

I didn’t know they ever had credibility.

Jay on July 10, 2009 at 1:10 PM

Oh, and if there is a Democratic bloodbath in 2010, look for Hillary! to jump ship.

GarandFan on July 10, 2009 at 1:10 PM

Watch for the admin/media to go after someone VERY SOON.

JiangxiDad on July 10, 2009 at 1:03 PM

I think they realize they’re unlikely to win against Rush and that Beck is next in line.

With their polls tanking, I expect them to step up their attacks on talk radio hate speech.

petefrt on July 10, 2009 at 1:11 PM

Without a strawman, Obama is visible to people for first time.

JiangxiDad on July 10, 2009 at 1:05 PM

It’s also becoming apparent to all but the willfully blind that he’s not the moderate he campaigned as.

ProfessorMiao on July 10, 2009 at 1:11 PM

Tazz 55 on July 10, 2009 at 12:50 PM

Isn’t that the cast of the next Star Wars movie?

Darth Vader, The Emperor, and Chewbacca.

Wolftech on July 10, 2009 at 1:11 PM

The fact that no Republicans are not out taking advantage of these polls is depressing. As a conservative I just assume that if they were back in the majority the would be “curing” our problems in the same way, spending. Either there are no conservatives left or the Republicans would find their a$$ with both hands.

Cindy Munford on July 10, 2009 at 1:09 PM

I guess the silver lining could be the old political adage of not getting in the way of your opponent hanging himself.

It might not be time to have Republicans opening their mouths about anything. Steele might be using the tactic of just letting Americans find out how bad things can get when all three branches of the tree are democrats.

Thunderstorm129 on July 10, 2009 at 1:12 PM

Oh, and if there is a Democratic bloodbath in 2010, look for Hillary! to jump ship.

GarandFan on July 10, 2009 at 1:10 PM

I look for her to gone before then. She will be gracious, but Obama will look bad as a result.

cozmo on July 10, 2009 at 1:12 PM

Voters under $40K per year trust Democrats more

I don’t believe they trust them . . . the Democrats are just their best bet for a handout.

rplat on July 10, 2009 at 1:12 PM

This is just one reason that the Cap and Tax bill has been put on hold. The Dems are on the edge of a very steep slope and they know it. The numbers are going to get worse and they know it. This should at least delay anymore stupid spending for the near future.

Johnnyreb on July 10, 2009 at 1:12 PM

I -still- think they like this big government stuff and are biding their time till they get to hold all the new powers.

lorien1973 on July 10, 2009 at 12:45 PM

Unfortunately, I couldn’t agree more.

Does anyone really believe that the average “Republican” is going to cut government much, if any?

That would be tantamount to shooting yourself or your fellow Republican senators and congressmen in the foot – and no one wants to upset the status quo.

Right, John McCain?

VibrioCocci on July 10, 2009 at 1:13 PM

GarandFan on July 10, 2009 at 1:10 PM

She’ll jump before November twenty-10. Unemployment and inflation will start hitting with full force starting in the spring. She’ll grab up all the PUMAs and head for the hills.

Limerick on July 10, 2009 at 1:13 PM

Limerick on July 10, 2009 at 1:03 PM

Just out of curiosity, Limerick, what law was that innocent referring to?

OldEnglish on July 10, 2009 at 1:13 PM

I TRUST THE DEMOCRATS!! GO DEMS!
STIMULUS 2.0 BRING. IT. ON.

Democrats rowed the boat ashore
Hallelujah
Democrats rowed the boat ashore
Hallaluuuuuujah
RR

ramrants on July 10, 2009 at 1:13 PM

I say we have another crisis thrown at us. Maybe international.

genso on July 10, 2009 at 1:07 PM

I don’t think it will be int’l, because that never helps him. His stock-in-trade is racial and class warfare. He the black avenger. He needs a domestic issue/enemy to use his weapons on effectively. If I was him, I’d raise something like the reparations issue.

JiangxiDad on July 10, 2009 at 1:14 PM

Aka the gimme-gimme-gimme demographic.

BuckeyeSam on July 10, 2009 at 12:50 PM

Which points the way clear for Democrats to consolidate their hold on power: Increase size of the gimme-gimme-gimme demographic.

PackerBronco on July 10, 2009 at 1:15 PM

It’s also becoming apparent to all but the willfully blind that he’s not the moderate he campaigned as.

ProfessorMiao on July 10, 2009 at 1:11 PM

Sure he’s a ‘moderate’–to the Left a ‘moderate’ is a big gov’t, pro-abortion, blame America first, friendly toward Islam and dictators, global warming crusader.

For them, extremism exists only on the Right.

jazz_piano on July 10, 2009 at 1:15 PM

Among age demographics, only the youngest voters trust Democrats more than Republicans, and only by a 45%-36% margin.

To quote Rush, “Ignorance is an expensive commodity.” If we only had an education system that could reduce the ignorance of youth.

WashJeff on July 10, 2009 at 1:16 PM

OldEnglish on July 10, 2009 at 1:13 PM

Health care. It is owed to him.

Limerick on July 10, 2009 at 1:16 PM

It might not be time to have Republicans opening their mouths about anything. Steele might be using the tactic of just letting Americans find out how bad things can get when all three branches of the tree are democrats.

Thunderstorm129 on July 10, 2009 at 1:12 PM

Well at least one Republican is speaking out. I heard on the radio during lunch that Sarah Palin is coming down to Texas in the next few months to campaign for Rick Perry. Perry’s been very vocal against the stimulus, so it’s good to see those two pairing up.

Oh, and I love that she’s sticking it to Kay Bailey.

Doughboy on July 10, 2009 at 1:16 PM

But don’t our Republican intellectuals tells us we need to be more like democrats?

SouthernGent on July 10, 2009 at 1:16 PM

while those inside the political class support Democrats … 99%-1%.

The way Rasmussen defines “Political Class” puts only 7% of those polled in this group. So, I’m not too terribly surprised that 1) they’re skewed to the Democrats and 2) skewed so much. How Rasmussen defines PC:

Do they generally trust the judgment of America’s people or the judgment of its political leaders? Do they view the federal government as its own special interest group? Do they see big government and big business often working together against the interests of consumers and investors?

… Mr. Rasmussen calls the “Political Class,” who expressed confidence in government on all three questions.

LastRick on July 10, 2009 at 1:16 PM

I TRUST THE DEMOCRATS!! GO DEMS!
STIMULUS 2.0 BRING. IT. ON.

ramrants on July 10, 2009 at 1:13 PM

My vision is not what it used to be.
I couldn’t find your /sarc tag in that post.
Did I miss it?

VibrioCocci on July 10, 2009 at 1:17 PM

Raise the reparations issue? I believe that is what most of his agenda is all about already.

spacewife on July 10, 2009 at 1:17 PM

How could all these people be so utterly stupid in 2006 and 2008 yet all the sudden “get it”?

Easy.

1) Willie Whistle is black.
2) Dems were able to skate on the coattails of “Teh most awesomest, wicked coolest, most incredibly popularest, most barrior-breakingest, history makingest, Presitential candidate EVAH” even though he had no record and was only going to win because of the color of his skin, not the content of his character.
3) The MSM was successful in creating the assumption that the GOP was still in charge of things even though they’d been out of power for two years. Add to this whole the “McCain = Bush’s 3d term” thing, and the lack of reporting on Willie Whistle’s background and assosiations.

People simply got caught up in the hype of voting for the first black president, and people who don’t normally pay attention to politics unless it’s during an election year probably had no idea that the GOP wasn’t the majority, with the way the MSM was reporting on it.

The Dems can’t hide behind that anymore, not with solid majorities in both houses and the White House in their possesion. And because they can’t hide anymore, people are finally starting to smarten up.

crazy_legs on July 10, 2009 at 1:18 PM

Dems will be looking for as many Rep. sex scandals as possible. Dumpster diving.

JiangxiDad on July 10, 2009 at 1:18 PM

JiangxiDad on July 10, 2009 at 1:14 PM

Perhaps you are correct. Still, I don’t think he has gotten much traction on conservative icons. Maybe the racial/class warfare will be ramped up. It’s coming up on the hot days of the summer now. I have a friend who was a cop in Durham, NC. He always hated the summers because the heat aggravated racial tensions.

genso on July 10, 2009 at 1:18 PM

Oh, and if there is a Democratic bloodbath in 2010, look for Hillary! to jump ship.

GarandFan on July 10, 2009 at 1:10 PM

Absolutely this is going to happen.

It’s just a matter of WHEN.

I think she’s going to try to stick it out until the 2010 debacle. If things remain this bad, she resigns and starts campaigning for the 2012 nomination, and the Obama Regime effectively becomes as helpless as Carter was during the 444 days.

There are two parts of the Omama Regime right now: the Chicago Machine, and the Clinton Machine. The Chicago side is very brutal gets it’s way by brute force. The Clinton side puts winning above everything and isn’t above “triangulating”. The Clinton people desert him and Obama loses ALL the polish and the Mayor Daley in him shows up.

wildcat84 on July 10, 2009 at 1:18 PM

I’m just glad that after 8 years of hearing about Bush there is going to be a new name followed by the words “failed policies.”

scalleywag on July 10, 2009 at 1:18 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3


You must be logged in to post a comment.