Obama patronage worse than thought
posted at 11:58 am on July 8, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Presidents routinely reward big contributors with political-patronage jobs, especially in the diplomatic corps. The only reason this makes news in the Obama administration was because of Barack Obama’s oft-repeated conceit that he would bring a new kind of politics to Washington that would reject the kind of nepotism and patronage of the past. Yesterday, the Washington Times took a look at Obama’s start and sees a lot of Same Old, Same Old where Obama promised Hope and Change:
President Obama’s campaign to bring change to the nation’s capital hasn’t kept him from continuing the Washington tradition of handing out ambassadorships to political friends and fundraisers.
An old college roommate, the head of an entertainment production company and a lawyer whose family made its money selling vacuum cleaners are among more than a dozen people who have won ambassadorships after raising a total of at least $4 million for Mr. Obama’s presidential campaign, according to public records.
The practice has been common for both political parties.
Since the Kennedy administration, presidents have given political appointees about 30 percent of the roughly 170 ambassadorships globally. While analysts say it’s too early to say how Mr. Obama’s administration will compare, government watchdog groups contend that the practice seems at odds with the president’s populist rhetoric against “special interests.”
Jim McElhatton gives a good rundown of the Obama bundlers who bought themselves positions within the Obama foreign service, but as Morgen at Verum Serum notes, that only tells part of the story. In fact, Obama has extended patronage across the entire administration. Half of the top bundlers already have jobs in the federal government:
Add these up and that’s 12 appointments (12!) to key diplomatic positions that were awarded directly to top Obama fundraisers. And that’s within only the first 6 months of the Administration. I expect there will be more to come, which is why I had initially held off on posting this.
But that’s not all. The tables above represent only the ambassadorship appointments. Take a look at some of the other Administration positions awarded within the ranks of the campaign bundlers …
Yes, the Chairman of the FCC. Three positions within the Attorney General’s office. A key legal advisory role within the White House itself. And the Corporation for National & Community Service has made headlines over the past month for the firing of Inspector General Gerald Walpin.
By my calculation, nearly half of the top level of Obama campaign bundlers have been rewarded with some sort of role within the government.
None of this should come as a surprise to anyone who knows about Chicago politics and its own patronage system. Obama grew up, politically speaking, in a system that routinely handed out cushy sinecures to contributors. He never once lifted a finger to reform the Daley Machine or even oppose it; instead, Obama embraced Daley and the political power Daley lent Obama.
Morgen wonders when the national media will start taking a closer look at Chicago-on-the-Potomac. I’d be pleasantly surprised if they did, but that won’t stop us from highlighting it for as long as it takes.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Not possible.
…is what I would like to say.
Count to 10 on July 8, 2009 at 12:01 PM
How come nobody uses the word bribe anymore?
Vashta.Nerada on July 8, 2009 at 12:02 PM
Yawn.
Just like another Ayers or socialism/communism post. Old rehash.
Ed, looks like it’s a slow newsday, huh?
ckoeber on July 8, 2009 at 12:03 PM
But he promised to be different…
myrenovations on July 8, 2009 at 12:03 PM
The scary thing is that he is essentially building a government around his cult followers. His dirty fingerprints will be all over government policy for years to come even after the fitlhy liar is out of power and his contributors are back in Chicago.
highhopes on July 8, 2009 at 12:04 PM
Don’t bother investing in American companies under the Obama Administration. Invest in the Obama Administration instead. The returns are better.
Cicero43 on July 8, 2009 at 12:04 PM
is anybody really surprised by this?……didn’t think so.
SHARPTOOTH on July 8, 2009 at 12:05 PM
Well it’s new because we haven’t had Chicago style politics in the White House in a long time. Not merely corrupt, but massively corrupt.
rbj on July 8, 2009 at 12:05 PM
He is. I’ve never been more appalled and ashamed of government than I have been this last six months as a street thug from Chicago is running around acting like a third-world tyrant.
highhopes on July 8, 2009 at 12:05 PM
And now you know why things are bad now and will be immensly worse in the future. Obama isn’t hiring the best people for the job. He’s giving jobs to the best donors.
Thunderstorm129 on July 8, 2009 at 12:06 PM
Oh goody, the vacuum cleaner salesman are in charge.
fogw on July 8, 2009 at 12:06 PM
“conceit” – Perfect word choice to describe Obama’s BS promises.
forest on July 8, 2009 at 12:06 PM
It just goes to show, it not what you know, it’s who you know. He has gone back on almost all his “hopey and changey” rhetoric. I hope all those dumba@# college students that are reduced to minimum wage jobs because of Obama’s destruction of the free market economy get a clue.
TXMomof3 on July 8, 2009 at 12:08 PM
Perhaps, but aren’t loyalty oaths required to receive any real returns?
BuckeyeSam on July 8, 2009 at 12:08 PM
He’s “clean and articulate”. That makes all the difference.
SouthernGent on July 8, 2009 at 12:08 PM
My gut is telling me that voters in Chicago are going to change that real soon. I see crash and burn Daley’s future.
Knucklehead on July 8, 2009 at 12:09 PM
Even if every news program did an hour-long special on this corruption and hypocrisy, it still wouldn’t register with the “who cares, where’s my check?” crowd. Wish I knew what would make them roll over and pay attention.
sherry on July 8, 2009 at 12:11 PM
VP Biden was pleased to hear there were other bunglers in the Administration.
Patrick S on July 8, 2009 at 12:11 PM
Claude Rains could not be reached for comment-still dead.
Del Dolemonte on July 8, 2009 at 12:12 PM
Really? That would be worthy of an epic Chaucer-esque poem.
myrenovations on July 8, 2009 at 12:13 PM
Just because he puts the taxpayers of Chicago on the hook for the 2016 Olympics without consulting the aldermen? As long as Will County does not get roped in, I will sit back and laugh.
WashJeff on July 8, 2009 at 12:13 PM
Why, when a republican fails to live up to republican ideals that the world screams, even though we tend to punish our own, while something like this is passed around only amongst us. No one else hears about it. It frustrates me immensely.
aelhues on July 8, 2009 at 12:14 PM
CHANGE!
ornery_independent on July 8, 2009 at 12:15 PM
All the ‘stuff’ you read in high school history and civic textbooks comes to life right before your eyes.
I believe the leftist activists have also read George Orwell and Aynn Rand, not a cautionary tales of pitfalls to avoid, but as handbooks on how it could be done.
Skandia Recluse on July 8, 2009 at 12:15 PM
I won….
when pigs fly
cmsinaz on July 8, 2009 at 12:15 PM
The Olympic’s thing is just chump change.
My final answer is…….
Parking Meters
Knucklehead on July 8, 2009 at 12:16 PM
When will Ogabe apologize to the rest of us for his OWN arrogance?
/holds breath
ornery_independent on July 8, 2009 at 12:17 PM
Huh, I suspect you are right, and that is the answer to my question. I know it at least in part, is due to the general liberal bent in the media, but it wouldn’t be so complete, if there were more of a market for it.
aelhues on July 8, 2009 at 12:18 PM
The fight for liberty draws out more passion in people. When liberty is taken away, people get pissed. When your quest is power, as it is for statist, screw ups must be ignored or the quest for power will be slowed or subverted.
WashJeff on July 8, 2009 at 12:19 PM
“Change You Can Believe In” = more of the same old corrupt, pay-to-play crap, only worse.
AZCoyote on July 8, 2009 at 12:19 PM
Too bad that is just a local story. The nation should also get to enjoy the hilarity of that screw up.
WashJeff on July 8, 2009 at 12:21 PM
That crowd does not value nor want liberty. As long as they are getting what’s due them, all this other stuff is distraction.
Jvette on July 8, 2009 at 12:22 PM
I won! Whoo-hoo!
Wyznowski on July 8, 2009 at 12:25 PM
Obama
patronageworse than thought.bayview on July 8, 2009 at 12:25 PM
Obama could easily be the biggest nightmare this nation has had to endure. His lies and deceptions are so obviously transparent that even the most leftwing nutjobs are getting embarrassed. When the lemmings have united, its only a matter of time until we have to deal with the cliff.
volsense on July 8, 2009 at 12:25 PM
One more signpost on the road to serfdom.
spmat on July 8, 2009 at 12:26 PM
Wash the kings feet? Thats an ambassadorship to Samoa.
Next.
portlandon on July 8, 2009 at 12:30 PM
I can’t wait to see his list of pardons. Ole slick Willie does not stand a chance.
percysunshine on July 8, 2009 at 12:37 PM
That answer is easy, I am just waiting for enough of you to come to terms with it before I feel it is safe enough to discuss.
ClassicCon on July 8, 2009 at 12:38 PM
Then you had better work to defeat Chicago’s bid for the Olympics.
If private funding dries up the City will be on the hook for the difference. Then the City will complain like hell to Springfield and Washington that it is their fault the City had to spend so much money on the makeup costs.
Don’t snooze. Organize to defeat the Chicago Olympic bid. Defeating the Mayor’s pet project is critical to dismantling the machine. If the City gets the Olympics the machine retools for another 20 years.
What do you want?
gabriel sutherland on July 8, 2009 at 12:38 PM
Please tell me that Michael Steele and others with the RNC are keeping a handy reference list of this, the # of Czars, the Biden gaffes, the TOTUS gaffes, the bowing, the apologies, etc…and preparing an onslaught of videos to spread across this great Nation to inform the uninformed as 2012 approaches.
redwhiteblue on July 8, 2009 at 12:39 PM
Given the current trend toward nationalization, that will soon be a distinction without a difference.
zmdavid on July 8, 2009 at 12:40 PM
Why is it that you’re always trashing Obama? He can’t help it if the most qualified people for the job happen to be his biggest contributors. /sarc
GrayDog on July 8, 2009 at 12:40 PM
MikeA on July 8, 2009 at 12:40 PM
Did Obama say hope, and change?
That was a typo. He meant to say…
Hope for more of the same!
capejasmine on July 8, 2009 at 12:41 PM
To be fair to the filthy liar, part of the inattention is due to the fact that people just don’t trust government to do anything but take the low road. They’ve forgotten that it is THEIR government. The primping and preening political class work for them, not the other way around.
It is time we take control of government and throw the whole lot of professional politicians out and replace them with people who are working in the national interest, not the next reelection campaign. First step is term limits with a grandfather clause that time already served in Congress counts!!!
highhopes on July 8, 2009 at 12:41 PM
Why, when a republican fails to live up to republican ideals that the world screams, even though we tend to punish our own, while something like this is passed around only amongst us. No one else hears about it. It frustrates me immensely.
aelhues on July 8, 2009 at 12:14 PM
Actually this is an interesting question that I have nailed a few lefties on.
The general argument the lefties make is that when a Republican has an affair or some such it is the hypocrisy that makes it an issue, so when a Democrat has an affair, well who cares. Note, this even covers Democrats who talk up family values and such because everyone knows they don’t mean it.
Ok, so what about when lefties violate their environmental/good government/etc pieties? Isn’t that hypocrisy also? Oh, no! Because the Left has no values they push onto other people…oh no! Regulations, laws, etc don’t count because of…because that’s why!
Now, this is how the discussion will go, but this all gets easier when you break it down to what lefties really think. Charges of hypocrisy are easy to make – after all everyone violates their own moral code here and there – and making a movement take a hit every time some individual does something bad is effective. This is straight out of Alinsky mind you.
But doesn’t Al Gore’s extravagant use of fossil fuels, for example, bother lefties at some level? No. Liberalism is about acquiring power and enjoying the perks it brings. Forcing powerful liberals to pay a price for this sort of hypocrisy doesn’t help the left acquire power, and certainly would hurt the whole perk aspect, so why would they want to?
18-1 on July 8, 2009 at 12:41 PM
one would hope so…
cmsinaz on July 8, 2009 at 12:42 PM
The abolishing of all public schools, but that’s off topic.
WashJeff on July 8, 2009 at 12:43 PM
I thought we couldn’t find any people who knew Obama back in college.
Greg Toombs on July 8, 2009 at 12:44 PM
Where’s MB4?
This thread is just begging for a good Mark Twain quote.
hillbillyjim on July 8, 2009 at 12:44 PM
Figures often beguile me, particularly when I have the arranging of them myself; in which case the remark attributed to Disraeli would often apply with justice and force: “There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics.”
- Mark Twain
MikeA on July 8, 2009 at 12:46 PM
This is OT but, Rasmussen has The Obamatolla’s approval rating at Minus 5! Lowest ever.
kayo on July 8, 2009 at 12:46 PM
Maybe this one fits better.
The most outrageous lies that can be invented will find believers if a man only tells them with all his might. -Mark Twain
MikeA on July 8, 2009 at 12:48 PM
And now he won’t talk, will he?
WashJeff on July 8, 2009 at 12:49 PM
Washington DC has become New Chicago.
darwin on July 8, 2009 at 12:52 PM
!!
Made me laugh; hard to do these days!
mr.blacksheep on July 8, 2009 at 12:53 PM
So the only way a leftist could truly be a hypocrite is to do something that diminishes his own power and wealth?
zmdavid on July 8, 2009 at 12:59 PM
The ghost of Al Capone haunts the White House.
Steve Z on July 8, 2009 at 1:02 PM
Those who vote against Daley will be mysteriously found at the bottom of Lake Michigan, identifiable by heavy chains around their necks. They will then vote Democrat in the next election.
Steve Z on July 8, 2009 at 1:08 PM
Saw this quote somewhere on the internet..
Keemo on July 8, 2009 at 1:19 PM
I really hate this administration–with all my might!
jeanie on July 8, 2009 at 1:23 PM
Obama rewarding with jobs those who raised the most $$$ for him just makes sense. To Obama, fundraising is the only metric of success. It’s all he knows. It’s all he’s ever done. In fact, the media told us that was Obama’s biggest qualification for the presidency – he ran his campaign so well and raised so much money…
ROCnPhilly on July 8, 2009 at 1:29 PM
Not possible!
DanaSmiles on July 8, 2009 at 1:36 PM
Maybe this will tide you over:
stimulas
Now here is a zinger, from the 1920′s
And for the one you requested: (notice the date)
right2bright on July 8, 2009 at 1:43 PM
Ambassadors do very little
so who cares if the guy who was Obama’s favorite professor or a guy who raised a couple of mil is made an ambassador
karasoth on July 8, 2009 at 1:58 PM
Didn’t CNN have a video of that a few days ago?
bluelightbrigade on July 8, 2009 at 2:22 PM
Mayor Daley will be Mayor for life. He will die in office as did his father before him. There is 0% chance that he would be defeated in an election. No one will even run against him. He is very well liked by Chicagoans and would pull 80% of the vote if he had a legitimate challenger, which he does not. There is always the possibility of a federal indictment, but so far he has not been touched by all the scandals in his administration.
Ted Torgerson on July 8, 2009 at 2:26 PM
I told you…there goes the neighborhood
Jeff from WI on July 8, 2009 at 2:38 PM
It matters, because Obama made such a freaking show in the campaign about how U.S. foreign policy was going to be different and better if he was elected. There were going to be all these wonderful career diplomats running the embassies, not the President’s pals and moneymen.
rockmom on July 8, 2009 at 2:54 PM
Fixed
NoFanofLibs on July 8, 2009 at 2:56 PM
Don’t speak so soon WashJeff.
If Cap-and-Tax passes, you can replace ‘Parking Meters’ with ‘Electric Meters’, ‘Gas Meters’, ‘Water Meters’, ‘Food Prices’, et al.
Chaz706 on July 8, 2009 at 2:58 PM
Channeling former HA troll: No you’re wrong, he wasn’t a vacuum cleaner salesman he’s was the CEO of a large manufacturing company with many responsibilities that helped hone his executive and leadership abilities in order to bring about the GLORIOUS HOPE AND CHANGE WE NEED!
THE ADULTS ARE IN CHARGE NOW FOGW SO LEAVE HIM AND MY SAVIOR OBAMA ALONE!
Ok, now I need some migraine medicine and a shower, channeling idiocy makes my head hurt and makes me feel dirty!
Liberty or Death on July 8, 2009 at 3:19 PM
I support Obama on this one. We have for years, decades, complained about the low quality of career civil servants at Foggy Bottom. The idea that talent and merit are passed over when a Richard Armitage or Joe Plame is snubbed for a private citizen millionaire who will responsibly represent the President’s views is a joke. True, Obama isn’t looking out for Number One, but granting more autonomy to the State Department bureaucracy would not help.
Chris_Balsz on July 8, 2009 at 3:19 PM
Keep your Change!
BigMike252 on July 8, 2009 at 4:28 PM
The fact of his patronage operation and his lies about “special interests” and “transparency” speak to issues that were easily predictable before the election:
He is a Chicago Democrat with no exerience and has lied so many times already that his public statements are now meaningless.
Jaibones on July 8, 2009 at 4:58 PM
“Patronage” is the new “Corruption“!!
landlines on July 8, 2009 at 6:22 PM
No shit!
LarryG on July 8, 2009 at 7:16 PM