China suppresses Uighur protests, 140 dead
posted at 12:50 pm on July 6, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Normally, the Chinese have the most trouble with Tibet and their efforts to wrest themselves from Beijing’s control. Today, though, the focus in China falls on the Xinjiang province, where protests by ethnic Uighurs got violently suppressed by Chinese authorities. At least 140 are reportedly dead, although hardly a peep has been heard from most American media:
The official death toll in riots in China’s northwestern Xinjiang region rose sharply Monday, with the government saying that 140 had been killed in what appears to be one of the deadliest episodes of unrest in China in decades.
Police said at least 828 other people were injured in violence that began Sunday in Urumqi, Xinjiang’s capital. Witnesses said the conflicts pitted security forces against demonstrators, and members of the region’s Turkic-speaking Uighur ethnic group against members of the country’s Han Chinese majority. Many among the predominantly Muslim Uighurs have chafed at Chinese government rule. …
Xinhua quoted Liu Yaohua, a senior police official in Xinjiang, as saying that rioters had burned 261 vehicles, including 190 buses and two police cars, several of which were still ablaze as of Monday morning. Mr. Liu said the death toll of 140 “would still be climbing.”
As evening fell in Urumqi Monday, witnesses said that paramilitary troops of the People’s Armed Police, backed by armored personnel carriers, were patrolling largely calm city streets. Many businesses remained shuttered and gates of the city’s central bazaar, which was the scene of unrest Sunday night, were closed.
Police said they were still searching for dozens of people suspected of fanning the violence. Several hundred people have already been arrested in connection with the riot, police said, and the government said it was bringing “ethnic officials” from nearby areas to help with interrogations.
As with military coups, not all protests are created equal. Chinese officials have begun to blame foreign agitators for fomenting the violence in Urumqi and throughout the Xinjiang region, as did Iran with their unrest over the rigged presidential election. Unlike Iran, however, China has some factual basis for this claim. Al-Qaeda has recruited and trained Uighur radical Islamists, who want independence for Xinjiang in order to establish a Turkic theocratic state, just as the Taliban created in Afghanistan.
That doesn’t mean that other Uighurs don’t have legitimate claims on democratic reform and independence for better reasons, of course. The AQ-Taliban connection to the Uighurs makes it difficult to determine which forces are in play in Xinjiang at the moment, though. Broad assumptions in either direction would be a mistake, especially since the “freedom fighters” causing most of the trouble in that region don’t support freedom at all — just a change of tyrants.
Several e-mailers suggested that the Obama administration needs to get more vocal about this uprising in Xinjiang. In this case, “meddling” would be a mistake, and the silence of the White House is probably the best policy for the moment until the protest leaders — and their goals — become more clear.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
I credit Obama’s Cairo speech.
And I blame Bush.
lorien1973 on July 6, 2009 at 12:51 PM
Terrorists versus Communists.
Remember what happened last time we backed one of those sides.
MadisonConservative on July 6, 2009 at 12:52 PM
I bet Obama says “we’re just gonna have to wait and let it work itself out” when asked what stance he is going to take on it.
the Coondawg on July 6, 2009 at 12:53 PM
A pox on both their houses. In a dust-up between Islamo wack jobs and a commmie government, I’m with Kissinger: it’s a shame they both can’t lose.
guntotinglibertarian on July 6, 2009 at 12:53 PM
we’re so progressive. China kills them and we give them a Bahamas vacation.
cpr on July 6, 2009 at 12:54 PM
At least one city had more deaths than Chicago this weekend.
WashJeff on July 6, 2009 at 12:55 PM
If those damn jewish settlements would just stop, there would be no Muslim unrest in China. Israel must be stopped.
JiangxiDad on July 6, 2009 at 12:56 PM
(I’m presuming you mean Afghanistan) That’s not quite what happened last time. Don’t be silly.
lorien1973 on July 6, 2009 at 12:57 PM
Move all of the Uighurs to Bermuda.
txag92 on July 6, 2009 at 12:57 PM
Bermuda, actually. I’ve vacationed in Bermuda 11 times. I sent a letter to their Tourist Agency telling them that my wife and I will henceforth vacation in a Uigher-free destination.
guntotinglibertarian on July 6, 2009 at 12:57 PM
I can’t keep it straight…is this Bush or Reagan’s fault??
gregbert on July 6, 2009 at 12:57 PM
Never miss an opportunity. Here goes:
Obama’s mishandling of our foreign policy with China leads to adventurism on the part of the Chinese gov’t.
JiangxiDad on July 6, 2009 at 12:57 PM
I hate to be an insensitive troll, but you’re so dumb. It’s the fault of the JOOOOOOOSSS, silly.
guntotinglibertarian on July 6, 2009 at 1:00 PM
You will earn that 200 million Palau.
Mr. Joe on July 6, 2009 at 1:04 PM
Our first reactions this week are to:
- turn on a conservative leader
- side with AlQaeda aligned Uighurs
Wow.
faraway on July 6, 2009 at 1:04 PM
Ya think one or two or more of those Bermuda-bound or Palau-bound recently released Uighurs is behind some of this?
All that training otherwise going to waste. :-)
coldwarrior on July 6, 2009 at 1:05 PM
Move all of the Uighurs to
BermudaChicago.txag92 on July 6, 2009 at 12:57 PM
Commie on Muslim violence….Hmmmm, I wonder what Zero thinks about that?
Maybe Russia will come help the Chinese and Iran will come help the Uighurs.
What could go wrong?
izoneguy on July 6, 2009 at 1:06 PM
Let me guess. The Uighurs protested that they want China to send them to Bermuda. Then China officials put “To Bermuda” stickers on a bunch of body bags.
Daggett on July 6, 2009 at 1:07 PM
Obooba will be on the wrong side of this one faster’n a bat outa Helen Thomas’s sock drawer.
Akzed on July 6, 2009 at 1:08 PM
I anxiously await Obambi’s nuanced response to this.
jukin on July 6, 2009 at 1:08 PM
140 dead. As long as the Chinese used cluster munitions, napalm, FAE bombs or Sarin gas but NOT drones then I’m ok with it. Drones are just mean and inhumane.
Bishop on July 6, 2009 at 1:08 PM
We have some reinforcements at GITMO, just say the word and they are there.
Cindy Munford on July 6, 2009 at 1:09 PM
Hmmm.. On the one hand, the Uighurs are Muslims. On the other hand, the Chinese government is oppressive tyranny. That’s a tough choice. Obama’s head is going to explode.
Daggett on July 6, 2009 at 1:11 PM
Which was true of Iran as well, despite all the pundit posturing.
okonkolo on July 6, 2009 at 1:13 PM
Admittedly, I don’t know much about the history of China and the Uighur’s, but I find myself unconcerned about the treatment of Al Qaeda linked Muslim separatists rioting in the streets.
FloatingRock on July 6, 2009 at 1:15 PM
US: Let’s discuss the Uighur protests.
China: Sure, right after we discuss the status of the dollar and your debt situation.
US: What were we going to discuss, it has completely slipped my mind?
China: That’s what I thought.
LevStrauss on July 6, 2009 at 1:16 PM
It’s telling that the dateline is Shanghai. That’s like reporting from Miami for events occurring in Seattle. Is there anything in this report that hasn’t been obtained from Chinese media, excepting remote interviews? If not, you’re seeing what the PRC wants you to see. It’s in the government’s interest to portray any domestically organized group outside the Communist party with labels like “dangerous,” “terrorist,” “cult,” “counter-revolutionary,” “instigated and directed from abroad,” etc., whether it be Uighers wanting autonomy (or just not to be murdered due to Han rumors of sexual harassment), Tibetan monks protesting brutality, Falun Gong attempting to peacefully assemble, or students in Tienanmen Square. I think the fact that this “looks like France” likely has more to do with how the Chinese government’s news agency is spinning this than some common thread among Muslims worldwide.
calbear on July 6, 2009 at 1:17 PM
How long will it take the MSM to do an on-the-scene sobfest, featuring a doll lying in the rubble?
guntotinglibertarian on July 6, 2009 at 1:17 PM
Winner
faraway on July 6, 2009 at 1:19 PM
These are not anti-goverment protests, these are anti-Han protests.
Uighurs have been receiving benefits Han Chinese do not, they have no reason to protest the goverment.
Aristotle on July 6, 2009 at 1:19 PM
You might want to check the backstory on the Urumqi Uighur riots… there’s a lot of Han-Uighur tension that should be pointed out… a little instability in China at the moment. I’m here for the summer, and Twitter was blocked today. Interesting times in China! Check out this website for up-to-date info: http://www.thenewdominion.net.
I was in Xinjiang just three weeks ago… it’s a beautiful place, and the Uighurs there – mostly moderate, fun-loving people who enjoy music, drinking, festivities and great food – deserve to partake in China’s economic development without being persecuted by the Han for the actions of the separatist groups. I’m not taking away from the fact that the folks found in Afghanistan were bad guys, just pointing out that the many people rioting in Urumqi have valid complaints.
chinotex on July 6, 2009 at 1:19 PM
Ed, here’s an alternate headline suggestion: “Muslims riot in China”
DarkCurrent on July 6, 2009 at 1:20 PM
The “common thread” among Mooslims world-wide is:
1. Slaughtering their infidel neighbors since 674 AD
2. Marrying their cousins for 20 generations, which leads to that weird hopping-up-and-down, crazy-eyes thing.
3. Buggering little catamites while simultaneously throwing homosexuals out of tall buildings
4. Honor killing
5. Moving to advanced civilizations, collecting welfare benefits and then whining about oppression
guntotinglibertarian on July 6, 2009 at 1:21 PM
Nice. Nice.
guntotinglibertarian on July 6, 2009 at 1:23 PM
Do you really think that the guy who claimed Obama’s Cairo speech was “Surprisingly good” can possibly think of a truthful headline?
Aristotle on July 6, 2009 at 1:23 PM
Yep
DarkCurrent on July 6, 2009 at 1:23 PM
This is an example of exactly why the Chinese and Russians aren’t afraid of a Mullah Bomb. They will crush them like a bug should one to directed at them. We sit all wrapped up in our manufactured guilt and pretend to find ways for cro-magnons to love us.
Limerick on July 6, 2009 at 1:24 PM
Really? Geez, I missed that.
Zero cred.
guntotinglibertarian on July 6, 2009 at 1:25 PM
Every one of China’s 56 minorities receives benefits Han Chinese do not… they receive these benefits because the Han have benefits too… such as the state language being Han Chinese (Uighur is a Turkic language, that uses Arabic script, not Chinese characters). There’s also the whole “you look like a foreigner, so most Han don’t like you” aspect to it. For more on this side of the story, read about the outbreak of violence down in a Guangdong factory (the impetus for the riots in Urumqi), where a Han Chinese “got revenge” for losing his job by claiming some Uighur employees had sexually assaulted a Han… resulting in two deaths:
In China it’s hard to get the whole story, but it’s always worth digging around a little bit.
chinotex on July 6, 2009 at 1:25 PM
Gosh, that sounds almost as violent as a Saturday night in Chicago.
guntotinglibertarian on July 6, 2009 at 1:27 PM
So W. Was right when he announced a GWOT?
Who knew?
bluelightbrigade on July 6, 2009 at 1:28 PM
Is this a good idea? Obama most probably envies the control the Chinese government has over its people.
It’s probably better that we hear nothing from Obama and Biden.
landlines on July 6, 2009 at 1:28 PM
The Religion of Peace in The Workers’ Paradise. Perfect.
Kenosha Kid on July 6, 2009 at 1:29 PM
Sounds like they’re having a health debate there in China.
But hey, we have a singing pervert here to memoralize, so why’s this story in the news?
NoDonkey on July 6, 2009 at 1:30 PM
There you go again, throwing around th “T” word. You sound like one of those right-wing extremists Napolitano was warning us about.
If you would just stop using scary-words, everything would be fine.
guntotinglibertarian on July 6, 2009 at 1:31 PM
In this case, voting “Present” would be the right thing…
Ace ODale on July 6, 2009 at 1:32 PM
My wife and her family and most people around here speak Wu as their mother tongue, but have ‘Ethnicity: Han’ on their government IDs. ‘Han Chinese’ is not a language.
I look a lot more like a foreigner than most Uighers, yet Han and I seem to get along ok.
To me, this story seems to simply be about Muslims doing what Muslims seem to like to do: Burn, riot and destroy.
DarkCurrent on July 6, 2009 at 1:33 PM
My apologies – I meant the written language… A number of the minorities (Uighur, Tibetan, Mongol, Kyrgyz, etc.) don’t use Chinese characters in their primary language.
That’s because (I’m assuming) you’re what they consider the “good” kind of foreigner, aka white. Ask a Nigerian or a Uighur working in Guangdong if they get treated the same as a white American. (If my assumption of your ethnicity is incorrect, I apologize.
There are Uighurs who are all about this. Judging from what I’ve seen on the internet and on TV, this is more similar to what we saw in Tibet, and is more based on the ethnic issues than the religious issues.
chinotex on July 6, 2009 at 1:41 PM
Contrary to what the Uighers say and this article implies, the Uighers have no valid territorial claims on the Tarim River Basin (Xingiang province). The Han Chinese were running the place as early as the fourth century. The Uighers are a turkic people who lived in the Altai mountains until they conquered the Tarim basin sometime after the tenth century. China needs to resettle these usurpers back where they came from.
lonesomecharlie on July 6, 2009 at 1:43 PM
Seems to me what the Chinese Government likes to do is to burn and destroy.
How the criminals who run China now are portrayed as mainstream moderates is astounding.
The Chinese government is run by criminal thugs. Of course they kill people who oppose them, you don’t get to be a dictator by taking it easy on people who challenge your rule.
NoDonkey on July 6, 2009 at 1:45 PM
I completely disagree.
The Chinese Government is a criminal enterprise and is not the legitimate representative of the Chinese people. They have no moral or legal right to enforce their will.
Any challenge to the Communist Party in China is completely legitimate and should be encouraged by all freedom loving people.
NoDonkey on July 6, 2009 at 1:48 PM
Well, that leaves Obama out.
Daggett on July 6, 2009 at 1:50 PM
Glad to see that China is opening up to vigorous debating, just like the mullahs.
rbj on July 6, 2009 at 1:51 PM
I blame the Joooos. And Bush.
spmat on July 6, 2009 at 1:54 PM
Good guess. I’m about as white and hairy as the last Neanderthal (which I may in fact be). I don’t know any Nigerians or Uighurs working in Guangdong, but I have known dark-skinned Africans working in China. They seem to get along ok. While Han Chinese do have prejudices, in my experience they seem to get over them quickly when foreigners of whatever color are seen to behave in a civilized way.
DarkCurrent on July 6, 2009 at 1:54 PM
NoDonkey, I always agree strongly with your comments and won’t disagree on this. I’ll simply note these are Muslims rioting as usual, whether in China or elsewhere.
DarkCurrent on July 6, 2009 at 1:57 PM
I think it’s high time we start changing our relationship with China. That country is not our friend.
WisCon on July 6, 2009 at 2:00 PM
I was being overtly glib.
MadisonConservative on July 6, 2009 at 2:01 PM
Good for China. At least someone knows how to deal with radical Muslims.
Gregor on July 6, 2009 at 2:02 PM
Your loan shark isn’t your friend, either. But once you’re in that relationship, it gets…complicated.
guntotinglibertarian on July 6, 2009 at 2:03 PM
We should definitely encourage Al Qaeda allies all over the world. They love their freedom.
faraway on July 6, 2009 at 2:07 PM
I agee that it’s not unusual for them to riot, but for once, they seem to have pretty good cause for doing so.
NoDonkey on July 6, 2009 at 2:11 PM
Just above I said I always agree with you. I spoke too soon.
Encourage generally peaceful Tibetan Buddhists, ok. But these are just more Muslims ultimately wanting to join the New Caliphate. Sometimes the enemy of your enemy is not your friend.
DarkCurrent on July 6, 2009 at 2:11 PM
China is now our owner.
Mojave Mark on July 6, 2009 at 2:11 PM
The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
The more problems they cause for the Chinese Communist Party, the better.
NoDonkey on July 6, 2009 at 2:12 PM
Meanwhile, North Korea is testing new and improved Scud missiles (now with 15% less cud). Where’s Hillary on that?
Daggett on July 6, 2009 at 2:13 PM
They only collect if we prosper.
DarkCurrent on July 6, 2009 at 2:15 PM
Sometimes the enemy of your enemy wants you both dead.
DarkCurrent on July 6, 2009 at 2:17 PM
Since there is zero chance of the USA intervening on either side, can’t I just enjoy the Chinese Communist Party taking one in the shins for once?
Don’t be a killjoy.
NoDonkey on July 6, 2009 at 2:21 PM
I agree with the enemy of my enemy comment. If they’re both fundamentalist Muslims then eventually they will kill, enslave, or convert me; or try to as soon as it’s opportune.
Iran is a good example of this. Who cares who “wins” when either way you end up with crazy islamofascists.
Mojave Mark on July 6, 2009 at 2:24 PM
Brilliant. And if China were to eventually be Islamic, who would you turn to for help then? If I had to choose between a communist China and radical Islam … I’m fighting side-by-side with my new Chinese friend.
Gregor on July 6, 2009 at 2:24 PM
I am not allowed further comment
DarkCurrent on July 6, 2009 at 2:26 PM
Please don’t tell me that you really believe these people have a chance in hell against the Chinese Government.
China Islamic? Not in 10 lifetimes.
NoDonkey on July 6, 2009 at 2:27 PM
If it takes ten lifetimes, or 700 years, that is an acceptable timetable, as far as the Islamists are concerned. They are in this for the long haul, and our President is fighting the war on the basis of a daily poll.
gridlock2 on July 6, 2009 at 2:41 PM
The Chinese are becoming more capitalistic than us. They can call themselves what they want, but they’re not communist.
Libertarian Joseph on July 6, 2009 at 2:48 PM
Damn Pro-Lifers causing problems again.
mankai on July 6, 2009 at 2:49 PM
Sure they are.
In practice, communism has never been about the crap Marx put on paper. It was always an unworkable, unreadable, unrealistic meanderings of a worthless, maid raping drug addict.
All that’s really needed are the central ideas of atheism, class warfare and the perpetual revolution that must be preserved by any means necessary.
Murdering everyone who opposes the Communist Party is the result. When someone fights back (for once), I can’t help cheer for them. Even if they happen to be Muslims.
NoDonkey on July 6, 2009 at 2:59 PM
Internet and cell phones have been cut off in Xinjiang. It’s Iran all over again!
Dr B on July 6, 2009 at 3:00 PM
I would not call the Uighers friends, but I would happily allow any country or transnational organization that wants to take a swipe at China to do so. China poses a bigger threat to the U.S. than revivalist Islam in the long term. I know someone will make a snide comment about Islam being a religion of hatred, death, destruction etc. but the Uighers that we are referring to are not all Salafist,Wahabi, Ibn Tamiyya spewing drones of al-Qaeda, GIA, Muslim Brotherhood, EIJ, the Haqqani network, Hezbollah, Hamas, or Lashkar-e-taiba. While it’s for the best that the U.S. keeps its mouths shut, I won’t complain about internal violence in China.
Shock the Monkey on July 6, 2009 at 3:03 PM
The title of this article is incredibly misleading. The death figure is reported by the Chinese state media. I think it’s safe to say that most of them are killed by the rioters. The death toll would get reduced to like two or four or simply “unspecified” if the violence is other way around.
year_of_the_dingo on July 6, 2009 at 3:04 PM
Agree. The Islamists are unorganized, foolish, grabastic buffoons who at best will lob a nuke our way before they implode.
The Chinese are much more formidable.
NoDonkey on July 6, 2009 at 3:05 PM
Sources?
DarkCurrent on July 6, 2009 at 3:14 PM
“Fair is foul, and foul is fair:
Hover through the fog and filthy air.”
Who knew that Shakespeare was commenting on current events in China?
Seriously, though — at the distance we are, there’s no telling the black hats from the brown ones.
cthulhu on July 6, 2009 at 3:18 PM
I am astounded at how many here have such hatred for the practitioners of Islam (which is a religion I must say I absolutely despise)that they essentially see there to be no inalienable right to freedom for them. For them an oppressive communistic regime is what they should enjoy and say thank you sir may I have another to.
People, Islam is a nasty religion. It’s people, however, aren’t all nasty people. Yes Islam is responsible for a great deal of death and violence. (and of course the lefties will say Christianity is as well)
But were you to take ALL the deaths at the hands of Islam since it’s brutal inception it STILL wouldn’t rival the absolute slaughter and devastation on human rights COMMUNISM has had in just over 100 years of it’s reign of terror on the peoples of the world.
I am SICK TO DEATH of the way we cozy up to a brutal regime like China. Communism IS STILL the greatest threat to OUR FREEDOM and OUR SECURITY. The fact that so many moderates seem SO WILLING to play footsie with such nations as China makes the threat all the more impending, though the means may not be so overt when they over-run us as the means they might use that we worried about 20 years ago.
flyfishingdad on July 6, 2009 at 3:34 PM
Personally, I long for the day when China gets named the “Great Satan.” Where are the fatwahs? Hell, most Chinese aren’t even “people of the book” and eligible for dhimmitude. Grow some stones, Islamists.
Blacklake on July 6, 2009 at 3:40 PM
Not at all. Not unless people such as you have their way and organize world-wide condemnation of the Chinese for defending themselves against Muslim animals. That’s the point.
Right now, China is the ONLY country in the world with the right idea on how to handle Islam. They don’t need people such as yourself, or any other world groups telling them they need to be more tolerant.
Gregor on July 6, 2009 at 3:47 PM
You’re out of your friggin mind. That statement is so far out of touch with reality it’s scary.
Gregor on July 6, 2009 at 3:49 PM
Do you really believe the Chinese Communists give a Year of the Rat’s ass about worldwide protests?
As if that’s even likely.
Most worldwide protestors are lefty layabouts, I don’t have time to march in the streets holding signs.
NoDonkey on July 6, 2009 at 3:51 PM
I don’t know, Syria under Hafez Assad handled them pretty well, as does Murbarak with the Muslim Brotherhood.
NoDonkey on July 6, 2009 at 3:55 PM
Oh where to start?
Your comment is like saying …
Murder is really nasty, but the people who practice it are not.
ISLAM by nature, instructs it’s followers to murder anyone who does not submit. If a person claims to be a follower of Islam, they are either a person who wants to murder non-Muslims, or a person who is not a practicing Muslim. If they don’t believe in their own religion, they should simply leave it. If someone claims to be a follower of Islam, you best take their word for it and not simply assume they are lying to you.
Gregor on July 6, 2009 at 3:57 PM
Well said. Wait another 20 years when have more areas, which areas with muslin and non-Muslin popluation with riots. Islam doesn’t play well with others.
I cite: Lebanon, India, Thailand, Africa (many parts), Russia (the stans), China, Philippins, East Timor, and even parts of Argentina having current problems.
Over the next 20 you can add: Great Britain, France, Germany, Spain, Holland, Denmark, Sweden, Russia proper, Detroit, Virginia, Orange County(???).
Oil Can on July 6, 2009 at 3:59 PM
I’d give you +1000, but I’m out of HA credits. IOU?
DarkCurrent on July 6, 2009 at 4:11 PM
I disagree.
Muslims in western nations, for the most part, will eventually pay the same sort of lip service to their religion as our Christians pay to theirs.
Efforts by Islamist extremists to export their fanatacism are failing miserably. We still do need to prepare for attacks, but Islamic fundementalism has peaked.
The Chinese, however, aren’t going anywhere.
NoDonkey on July 6, 2009 at 4:19 PM
Granted. Now let’s remember where we are in history and examine the last 10 years…
DarkCurrent on July 6, 2009 at 4:20 PM
I’m out of touch with reality? HA! If you seriously believe that Islam is the biggest danger to U.S. National Security you seriously need to consider going back to school and taking a few classes in U.S. foreign policy. Al-Qaeda, its affiliates and its wanna-be’s could only dream to become a power as dominant as China will be. China threatens (or will threaten) the U.S. on every front. Economically the Chinese pose a major threat as its economy manages to grow and grow at a considerable rate (even though it has slowed recently). In regard to China’s military, it has the weapons necessary to pose a serious threat to our convential forces. While al-Qaeda may be able to send a boat full of exploses at the USS Cole, the Chinese military has an arsenal that could sink or severly damage our aircraft carriers. By the way, the Chinese are building those as well. By the way, China actually has access to weapons of mass destruction. Also, if the Chinese are not a threat to us or our allies, why are countries such as Japan and Australia who typically look towards the U.S. for protection bolstering their own armed forces? Moreover, China has influence over rogue regimes such as North Korea who serve as a major threat as well. While radical Islam is seriously a threat, a country such as China has far greater potential to hurt the U.S.
Shock the Monkey on July 6, 2009 at 4:24 PM
http://blogs.wsj.com/chinajournal/2009/07/06/a-dual-strategy-on-xinjiang-and-the-media/
Witnesses say police shot into the protesting crowd causing most of the deaths.
http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/content/view/19166/
Dr B on July 6, 2009 at 4:30 PM
I was in Albania in 2007. The country is 70% Muslim and I
only saw a half dozen women wearing burkas. Most were in
slacks or short dresses. I talked to a young male college
student who when I asked if he prayed four times a day
answered, “I don’t have time for that.”
We are assuming that all Muslims are radical and follow the
Koran to the letter. This is nonsense. It just may be
that the stereotype we have for all Muslims doesn’t apply
in the case of the Uighurs. From what I am reading there
are a few in the population that foment violence, but perhaps many who just want independence from China.
Lew_Lew on July 6, 2009 at 4:31 PM
Not only could they sink or severely damage our aircraft carriers, they could nuke our major cities. As we could theirs, to much more dramatic effect.
Yes, China is a threat. A relatively conventional threat. USSR is replaced with PRC? We can handle that.
We share a common enemy in radical Islam. An important point we should not ignore.
DarkCurrent on July 6, 2009 at 4:34 PM
The Republic of Uiheiristan won’t be a threat. How could it?
DarkCurrent on July 6, 2009 at 4:38 PM
This entire post only makes you look like you’ve been living in your grandma’s basement for the last ten years.
“ISLAM” is not a foreign military. It’s an ideology/cult which is spreading faster than any other virus in history. It has nothing to do with governments. Nothing to do with militaries. Nothing to do with borders. Nothing to do with economies. “ISLAM” is already your next door neighbor.
To make it quite clear …
Next time you’re at a gas station, liquor store, or even a Denny’s restaurant owned by a Middle Eastern person who may be Muslim, think about it as your children put the food into their mouths. This is food prepared and served to them by a follower of a cult which wants you and your children DEAD. If you think the all powerful US military is going to protect you, you’re a doofus.
To make matters worse, we now have Muslims working their way into local and federal government leadership positions. We have some of those leaders who publicly admit that they have no problem installing Sharia law if the majority of voters in their district should vote for it.
Wake the f*&k up! Islam is not going to be some great army marching through the streets. It will be your neighbor, cutting your throat in a back alley.
Gregor on July 6, 2009 at 5:00 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »