Saudis giving Israel a green light on Iran?
posted at 11:00 am on July 5, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
According to the Times of London, the Saudis have agreed to tacitly allow Israelis to transit their airspace to attack Iran and end its nuclear program. The Mossad has worked with the Saudis for several years as the Iranian threat in the region grew, and the Saudis — and other Arab states — would be privately relieved to have Tehran’s nuclear ambitions curtailed. But is now the right time, while the mullahs teeter in Iran?
The head of Mossad, Israel’s overseas intelligence service, has assured Benjamin Netanyahu, its prime minister, that Saudi Arabia would turn a blind eye to Israeli jets flying over the kingdom during any future raid on Iran’s nuclear sites.
Earlier this year Meir Dagan, Mossad’s director since 2002, held secret talks with Saudi officials to discuss the possibility.
The Israeli press has already carried unconfirmed reports that high-ranking officials, including Ehud Olmert, the former prime minister, held meetings with Saudi colleagues. The reports were denied by Saudi officials.
“The Saudis have tacitly agreed to the Israeli air force flying through their airspace on a mission which is supposed to be in the common interests of both Israel and Saudi Arabia,” a diplomatic source said last week.
Although the countries have no formal diplomatic relations, an Israeli defence source confirmed that Mossad maintained “working relations” with the Saudis.
The model for this attack is Syria, where the Israelis destroyed a nascent nuclear facility built by North Koreans. Unfortunately, that model may not be a good predictor of success in Iran. The terrain in Iran is much different than in Syria, where the facility stood out like a sore thumb on satellite recon images. The Iranians have reportedly dispersed their nuclear work so that an attack on one or two sites won’t cripple their work. The Israelis would have to have excellent intel in order to succeed — but then again, the Israelis usually have excellent intel, and if they’re working with the Saudis, that makes the odds better.
However, the Iranian regime looks on shaky ground at the moment. An Israeli attack now would almost certainly stop the momentum of the opposition, boosted today by the mullahs in Qum declaring the rigged presidential election illegitimate, and by extension also the regime that rigged it. A military strike would unite Iranians against the world and could set back the effort at real reform by 30 years, unless the Israelis attempted to decapitate the Guardian Council and Ali Khamenei.
If the Times has this right, the Israelis may want to bide their time to see what transpires next in Iran. They can’t wait forever, but the overthrow of the mullahs would be more likely to accomplish what Israel wants than an air strike.
Update: I wonder if Joe Biden checked in with the boss before saying this:
Vice President Joe Biden says the U.S. will not stand in Israel’s way if Israel believes military action is needed to eliminate Iran’s nuclear threat.
Biden says the U.S. “cannot dictate to another sovereign nation what they can and cannot do.”
Green light? Or just Biden being green at diplomacy, Obama-style?
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
Who would want Iran as a neighbor, assuming they had any sanity.
Apparently the Saudi don’t feel threatened by Israel as they do Iran.
Starlink on July 5, 2009 at 11:03 AM
Holy cow!!! As to Mr. Biden, it doesn’t matter what he says, they will stick their finger in the wind, see how the public is reacting and respond accordingly. They don’t have to worry about reelection for 3 and 1/2 years.
Cindy Munford on July 5, 2009 at 11:04 AM
Obama/Biden, not ready for prime time.
Zorro on July 5, 2009 at 11:06 AM
If Israel is a sovereign nation, can they also decide where to build houses? Or is a nuclear strike OK and houses no?
Phoenician on July 5, 2009 at 11:06 AM
The US is now getting Israel to do its dirty work ? Does this mean when Israel attack the US will veto any UN resolution condeming it ?
I wouldnt trust the Obama administration not to stab them in the back.
William Amos on July 5, 2009 at 11:07 AM
I think Biden is insane, seriously.
faraway on July 5, 2009 at 11:08 AM
So…Barry and Hillary aren’t seeing eye to eye. Now Joe says this. Is there a schism in Smart Power?
To quote President Reagan:
kingsjester on July 5, 2009 at 11:08 AM
Really? Your worried that destroying Irans nuke toys now will turn the protesters into Iranian patriots? Are you kidding? Who cares as long as their nukes are gone?
They are Muslims, not American wannabes.
BL@KBIRD on July 5, 2009 at 11:10 AM
Hondurans said to be laughing uproariously.
Bishop on July 5, 2009 at 11:10 AM
Biden… Obama’s foreign policy gravitas. Never get tired of thinking about that.
As to the actual matter at hand, I liked the wait and see what happens with the Iranian dissidents approach. But I am starting to wonder if a strike is put off because of positive signs in Iran, perhaps the Mullahs are allowing those positive signs to hit the news just so they can keep working on the nukes.
I trust the Israelis and their intelligence operation and whenever they choose to strike will almost certainly be the right time.
myrenovations on July 5, 2009 at 11:11 AM
Israel has an equal responsibility to oppose Iran. But in any case, containing Iran doesn’t seem to be a policy of the US gov’t any longer.
JiangxiDad on July 5, 2009 at 11:11 AM
This day just keeps getting more weird…
ladyingray on July 5, 2009 at 11:13 AM
Except when it comes to Honduras?
As for the Saudis…they have been dealing with the Israeli military establishment quietly for decades. Iran is a far more dangerous threat to the Saudis than Israel. Enemy of my enemy is my friend?
coldwarrior on July 5, 2009 at 11:13 AM
Well that too, but somehow I get the feeling that Biden has been tasked with Jew-appeasement. Biden’s got an in with E. Coast jews–people identify with his glib wise-guy E.coast shtick. Who else in the admin. could possibly do that–certainly not Emmanuel.
JiangxiDad on July 5, 2009 at 11:13 AM
Unless it’s Honduras trying to keep a dictator from taking over.
jgapinoy on July 5, 2009 at 11:15 AM
Or maybe the Mullahs in Qum are buckling due to all these military strike threats finally being waved around?
Fortunata on July 5, 2009 at 11:15 AM
And to top all this, Dear Leader is off on another apology tour. Only this time he going to negotiate with Putin. Yikes.
kingsjester on July 5, 2009 at 11:15 AM
Unless it’s Israel trying to maintain peace within its borders.
jgapinoy on July 5, 2009 at 11:16 AM
Didnt Joe say that within 6 months Obama would face a crisis ? He knows hes stuff snicker.
William Amos on July 5, 2009 at 11:16 AM
I don’t think this enept administration is sure of what their policy is. There could me remarkable stides made in the ME in the coming years with a competent and experienced predident and state department.
They will make more of a mess in the region. And this cap & trade (should it pass in any form) will increase our dependence on said region. A sobering thought.
HoustonRight on July 5, 2009 at 11:18 AM
Looking at the M.E. map you would think Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia would all be threatened by an Iranian nuclear weapon. Israel should have our whole hearted support, U.N. should take a pass on any condemnation resolutions.
fourdeucer on July 5, 2009 at 11:19 AM
I think you’re exactly right. Netanyahu is very shrewd though, so I expect that he’ll take some time to see how things in Iran progress.
Yossarian on July 5, 2009 at 11:19 AM
That’s possible.
myrenovations on July 5, 2009 at 11:20 AM
YES WE CAN.
If it’s Iran killing or beating or gassing peaceful protesters.
If it’s Russia invading its peaceful neighbor.
If it’s Saddam gassing the Kurds.
If it’s Hitler rounding up Jews.
Biden is a joke.
jgapinoy on July 5, 2009 at 11:20 AM
True. Maybe a reformed sharia would only cut off a finger for a first time theft? I wouldn’t expect a return to the days of the Shah, I think Islamic countries are going to grapple with the idea of an Islamic democracy for some time. Perhaps the best model for them is Jordan, but that seems to depend so much on the monarchy, the only dynastic line of the post-WW1 settlements not overthrown to date, IIRC.
Fortunata on July 5, 2009 at 11:21 AM
Clearly Joe is working for the Clinton’s !
He may save us yet. :~)
patrick neid on July 5, 2009 at 11:25 AM
I think that applies to foreign policy, not domestic. I think they assumed the despots would welcome Obama because he’s one of them, and give him the time and space to destroy America from within. And that’s prob. partially true. On the other hand, our enemies abroad (Barry’s allies) have their own national agendas, and the temptation to implement them while the US is weak may be too great to pass up. I truly believe Barry is trying to convince each one of the bad guys to chill so that Barry can do their dirty work at home for them. After that, they can create a new world in their preferred image.
JiangxiDad on July 5, 2009 at 11:25 AM
They are. Recall that none of them said boo when Israel took out the Syrian reactor last year, either.
ProfessorMiao on July 5, 2009 at 11:28 AM
Biden was briefed, by Israel of the possible mission in a secret meeting held in Joe’s favorite Katy’s diner.
Jeff from WI on July 5, 2009 at 11:29 AM
Knew I should have qualified the remark. thanks :)
HoustonRight on July 5, 2009 at 11:32 AM
Shown aerial maps of the potential bombing sites,Joe remarked, “Oh a Rorschach inkblot test, I’ve taken plenty of these!”
Jeff from WI on July 5, 2009 at 11:32 AM
Better to foment the people of Persia against their internal oppressors in the ayatollah/mullah-ocracy for the moment.
“The 80% Dictatorship”, as the dissidents have called their post-1979 theocratic tyranny, must END!
This may end their nuke ambitions naturally if the Persian people return to sanity and liberty.
Patience may be more effective than cruise missiles right now.
profitsbeard on July 5, 2009 at 11:33 AM
The report was also denied by Israeli officials, for whatever that’s worth.
Phoenician on July 5, 2009 at 11:34 AM
This is the real intent of the Obama Administration. Its called turning a blind eye to world events
William Amos on July 5, 2009 at 11:37 AM
I think that was the Bush admin’s idea.
MikeA on July 5, 2009 at 11:38 AM
As the Lefties Twist and Turn.
Saltysam on July 5, 2009 at 11:40 AM
SEOUL, South Korea (AP) – Vice President Joe Biden says North Korea’s Fourth of July rocket launches are part of “attention-seeking behavior.”
And, he tells ABC, “I don’t want to give the attention.”
William Amos on July 5, 2009 at 11:37 AM
Maybe Biden thinks Kim is suffering ADHD.
fourdeucer on July 5, 2009 at 11:44 AM
Obama and his regime are pathetic. We should be firmly supporting Israel instead of pandering to Obama’s Marxist/communist buddies. As for Biden . . . he needs to get home before he screws up anything else. Good lord this is sad.
rplat on July 5, 2009 at 11:45 AM
Sauds always play both sides
Biden setting up plausible deniability. Not green light unless US releases bunker busters. Obama hopes both sides lose. Islamo-terror nuke soon. Obama too weak, Israel worlds only hope. Obama thinks we won’t be blamed…
Reality Check on July 5, 2009 at 11:48 AM
Is there something in the water that causes people in Delaware to prefer a moron as a Senator?
Jeff from WI on July 5, 2009 at 11:50 AM
I’m sure liberals would be as generous as you are Ed, if this was a quote from Cheney… ;)
“WAR MONGER PUSHES JOOS TO ATTACK!”
Dash on July 5, 2009 at 11:53 AM
I think the larger point of not uniting the Iraqi people, is not uniting them behind their current leaders. Remember us after 9/11? Look at us now. It doesn’t seem like the same population now.
What’s a better solution? Blowing up what they have now and giving the Iran ruling class a “see we are being attacked”, or to give the eroding support for the ruling class more time to implode? If Iranians do have a true revolution and change how their country is ruled, the nuclear problem could possibly resolve it’s self when the majority of Iranians want to rejoin the world.
I have no illusions that Iranians would embrace the U.S. and become best friends forever. But they seem to be interested enough in themselves and wanting to improve their own situation. Their nuclear program can be attacked at anytime. It seems that there is only one chance for Iranians to take control of their own destiny. For the sake of the lives of our military, I say don’t attack until it’s absolutely necessary, and we aren’t there yet.
Hog Wild on July 5, 2009 at 11:54 AM
He knows hes stuff …..well, you do not want to mess with Joe
t on July 5, 2009 at 11:55 AM
A picture is worth a thousand words.
http://www.dslreports.com/r0/download/1344207~3e222a2902c7804e606b8f7fcaff2aed/Joe-Biden_smirk.jpg
diogenes on July 5, 2009 at 11:55 AM
Joe is giving Hugo a green light in Honduras, North Korea a green light in the Pacific and Israel a green light in the Middle East.
Green light special today !
William Amos on July 5, 2009 at 11:58 AM
The Saudis have just told our eunuch president to shut up and go take a hike. The whole world is laughing at the puppet with the loose strings. We definitely have change.
volsense on July 5, 2009 at 12:01 PM
Apparently, Biden didn’t get Obama’s Honduran memo. It’s OK to interfere if it helps ousted socialists.
kagai on July 5, 2009 at 12:03 PM
You obviously haven’t been to Delaware. What isn’t in the water?
JiangxiDad on July 5, 2009 at 12:07 PM
Me neither. In fact, I would expect it. Obama has no love for Israel, and he’d probably seize the chance to score points in the Muslim world.
petefrt on July 5, 2009 at 12:07 PM
LOL
Jeff from WI on July 5, 2009 at 12:09 PM
Obama will slap Biden back to “reality” for getting out of line.
RandyChandler on July 5, 2009 at 12:24 PM
Biden is a nutty duffer but he’s right on a few things, which is more than can be said for Obama.
I just wish Israel would lay down some serious markers at the UN; something along the line of “mess with us and you’re toast!”, and back it up, too.
SilentWatcher on July 5, 2009 at 12:25 PM
i agree with BL@CKBIRD. the people of Iran have been killing our soldiers in Iraq. i do not like them.
kelley in virginia on July 5, 2009 at 12:40 PM
I do have to hand it to Dear Leader. He actually is getting the Saudis & Israelis to cooperate. Not because He’s actually a Lightworker, but because He’s wussifying the US.
rbj on July 5, 2009 at 12:40 PM
I’m going with the latter.
bluelightbrigade on July 5, 2009 at 12:41 PM
Bolton added: “To this day, the Israelis haven’t admitted the specifics but there’s one less nuclear facility in Syria . . .”
the_nile on July 5, 2009 at 12:41 PM
Biden must have AIDS = Acute Intelligence Deficit Syndrome! Why else would he forget Honduras??? Obama’s foreign policy just lurches from pillar-to-post on a daily basis, and poor ol’ Joe just can’t keep up with the two step.
Bob in VA on July 5, 2009 at 12:44 PM
Uh Oh don’t they know we are burying the King of Pop?
This reminds me of the noise in the media right before 9/11 the fuss was about what Britney Spears was wearing…hint an albino snake.
Life is What happens while you are making plans.
Dr Evil on July 5, 2009 at 12:45 PM
Agreed. If Joe’s remark is a ‘green light’ from the White House and not another of his gaffes (or a misdirect), then the White House is being disingenuous.
ProfessorMiao on July 5, 2009 at 12:45 PM
I have no idea what evidence there is to point to this. All of the “reformers” in Iran have been as gung ho about nukes as anyone.
As to Biden’s words, (not that anything he says really matters) he’s trying to suck Israel into taking care of Iran so that the US can set about placing an embargo on Israel and trying to kill the state. That is obvious. The junta in Washington wants Israel dead.
progressoverpeace on July 5, 2009 at 12:53 PM
Tomorrow, Biden will be discussing the US stand on Israel’s planned attack date, launch time, flight plan, and targeting strategy.
Loxodonta on July 5, 2009 at 12:55 PM
Because, Biden continued, “we are way too busy, right now, telling our own citizens what they can and cannot do. We’ll get back to you as soon as we have that all wrapped up”.
Yoop on July 5, 2009 at 12:55 PM
Umm, why would anyone ever quote Joe Biden? It’s clear that he’s totally divorced from Obama’s decision-making process. Most irrelevant VP in the most irrevelevant office ever.
hawksruleva on July 5, 2009 at 1:08 PM
Not the average people. Quds force and the Revolutionary Guards are hardcore supporters of Ahmadinijad and Khamenei. There’s reason to believe that a reform movement would lead to Iran exporting less terror to it’s neighbors, if for no other reason than their desire to concentrate on their internal economy. Funny – nuclear programs are REALLY expensive. Maybe they shoudl put that on hold for a couple years…
hawksruleva on July 5, 2009 at 1:11 PM
I don’t think a change of government would have that much impact on Iran’s nuclear ambitions or its stance towards Israel.
zoyclem on July 5, 2009 at 1:14 PM
Israel has the testosterone and intelligence to do what our leadership can’t, or won’t do.
Thank You, Aaron!
Star20 on July 5, 2009 at 1:21 PM
Ed,
How do you know that? A military strike be the catalyst for Iranians to overthrow the regime, seeing it as weak in the face of Israeli attacks.
aengus on July 5, 2009 at 1:22 PM
To paraphrase George Bush, “the Israeli’s, doing jobs American’s won’t do”.
GarandFan on July 5, 2009 at 1:23 PM
Now is the time to strike.
A wounded animal is the most dangerous animal. A wounded animal needs to be put down.
Crushing the Iranian nuke program now with a massive strike will do more to open the eyes of reformist citizens to the self destructive policies of their own govt than standing in the street and eventually qoing home.
While Obama & Friends are playing grabass with Putin and whoever else, centrifuges are spinning in Iran to create nuclear weapons to dish out to whatever operatives and proxies that they choose.
It’s as easy as putting a nuke on a boat and sailing it into NY harbor and some jihadi detonating it.
Can we really afford to sit around and hope Iran magically reforms? Legal reforms take years. Revolutions are bloody and violent and unpredictable.
Strike now with crushing, demoralizing force.
Personally I would black out the entire country’s power grid before/during a strike. People understand devestation. When your country gets utterly defeated and thoroughly destroyed, you tend to change your thinking.
Just ask the citizens of Iraq.
We should have struck yesterday.
dip it in cider on July 5, 2009 at 1:34 PM
This means the Saudis won’t try to shoot down the Israeli planes until they’re on their way back to Israel.
daryl_herbert on July 5, 2009 at 1:39 PM
Ummm… No. The appropriate maxim here is, when your enemy finds himself imploding, the best thing to do is get out of the way.
And Joe Biden should be known as ‘there you go again, Joe’. The president gets to try anything he wants–even threaten force by Israeli proxy–and then claim plausibly that uncle Joe is off his rocker. If this was Cheney, the libtards would ve frothing at the mouth.
BryanS on July 5, 2009 at 1:42 PM
NO. It’s in the education system.
chemman on July 5, 2009 at 1:43 PM
It would be so tempting for the Saudis…kinda like the scorpion and the crocodile story.
BryanS on July 5, 2009 at 1:44 PM
Yeah, that’s what Biden said. Here’s what he meant to say…
Daggett on July 5, 2009 at 1:54 PM
Sorry BryanS, but Iran is not going to “implode”.
Somalia is an example of a country that has “imploded”.
Iran is enriching weapons grade uranium as we speak.
I would be happy for Iran to reform. But they are also spinning centrifuges.
The nukes and reform are two separate issues.
Taking out nukes in a massive strike can become the catalyst to reform much quicker than throwing rocks at the IRG.
There is no time to wait for some reformer or new govt that may or may not decide to “end” the program. And what is to stop these materials from filtering out to the black market or proxies for cash to Iranian officials that know they are on the way out. How many nukes did Russia “lose” during the transition from the USSR?
War happens in real time, BryanS.
Nuclear weapons grade uranium is “in play” in the volitile middle east. Right now.
It should have been destroyed yesterday.
What do you not understand about this?
dip it in cider on July 5, 2009 at 2:11 PM
Why it hasn’t been done yet.
doriangrey on July 5, 2009 at 2:17 PM
He is bringing with him a “Discharge” button to offset the first one. Then he and Putin can live happily ever after, together with Hugo, Ahmadinejad, Kim and Bo the wonder dog.
Michelle Dubois on July 5, 2009 at 2:18 PM
guntotinglibertarian on July 5, 2009 at 2:21 PM
Still waiting for Shrillary to leak negative inside info on how both domestic and foreign policy matters are being handled by the Obambi administration.
If she’s locked out of a chance to run for the Democratic ticket in 2012 because they go with Carter II again, then her goose is cooked as she’ll be around 70 I think in 2016.
Also, she must be ticked off that Barry got the nomination in the first place.
Unfortunately, when and if the Dems start attacking the current administration that will mean that things must really be bad for the country as a whole…bittersweet if you will.
Dr. ZhivBlago on July 5, 2009 at 2:23 PM
Khameini is going down. It won’t happen overnight, but soon. An Israeli strike right now will be the the only thing that would save Khameini and Dinnerjacket. If they had succeeded in crushing the opposition quickly, I think then there’d be a case for immediate strike.
BryanS on July 5, 2009 at 2:23 PM
I can’t wait to see Putin own our dumb Messiah. Here’s what Pravda is saying: http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/106914-0/
guntotinglibertarian on July 5, 2009 at 2:24 PM
They probably won’t be coming back – at least not the same way.
Vashta.Nerada on July 5, 2009 at 2:30 PM
Israel has to do this. One EMP strike and they are dead.
Pity is that Bush wouldn’t actively support them on it, long ago.
Now Obammy will use it as an excuse to ostracize Israel, which is what his anti-semitic wackjob base is slavering for.
guntotinglibertarian on July 5, 2009 at 2:33 PM
Why it hasn’t been done yet.
doriangrey on July 5, 2009 at 2:17 PM
I hope it is because the Israeli’s are being meticulous, as usual in their planning.
fourdeucer on July 5, 2009 at 2:34 PM
Hitlary could still run when she’s 70–don’t count her out yet. While her socialist tendencies would rule out my ever voting for her, at least she wouldn’t run a reincarnation of the Carter foreign policy like Obama is.
BryanS on July 5, 2009 at 2:35 PM
When a younger man, Biden became the third stooge between Shemp & Joe. They got rid of him because he was too stupid to remember his lines.
Jeff from WI on July 5, 2009 at 2:40 PM
“Saudis give green light”
Ain’t that BIG of them, not they they would ever get off their lazy azzes and DO or SAY anything against the mad mullahs!
Who would the Saudis call if Iran shut down the Gulf of Aden?
Bicyea on July 5, 2009 at 2:41 PM
AINT THAT THE TRUTH!! The Saudis would be the victim and the victor. Have their cake and eat it too!
Bicyea on July 5, 2009 at 2:45 PM
-
Joe after the fact… ‘That’s not what I meant when I talked about the use of force against Iran…’
-
RalphyBoy on July 5, 2009 at 2:50 PM
Even when Biden’s right he still sounds like an idiot.
Johnson on July 5, 2009 at 2:52 PM
I wonder if Huffpo will apologize to John Bolton for calling him a warmonger when he said Israel should attack Iran ?
William Amos on July 5, 2009 at 3:04 PM
Just because you say what Ed says, Bryan, doesn’t mean it is right.
A more realistic strategist knows that the Iranians aren’t the Palestenians. You can’t apply Palestenian logic to Iranians. A rational population (which the citizens of Iran have proven themselves to be) would see military strikes against themselves as a direct result of their own rogue government.
Sure, the Palestenians always blame and rally against Israel after strikes. But the average Palestenian also lives in poverty and is educated by Hamas. No access to the outside world or internet. Blaming Israel is a part of their national fiber.
Iran on the other hand is a modern country with citizens fully aware of the self destructive policies of their dictators. They can read about it everyday online, see freedom in Iraq thanks to the U.S., so what’s to say a massive strike that completely neutralizes the nukes and also kills the president and other leaders wouldn’t be the best thing for a new Iran to emerge?
New leadership steps in. Obviously the old leadership did something wrong. I would say that making statements about wiping Israel off the map while simultaneously building nukes constitutes an act of war. The Iranian people are smart enough to realize this and not just blame Israel/America/the West when they get bombed for getting out of line.
Iranians are literally begging for our support, and they don’t want strongly worded memos. *hint* Bombs. They know exactly what we did in Iraq. They are neighbors. Look at the Kosovo conflict as an example of what bombing alone can accomplish with no boots on the ground.
The Iranians are helpless as an unarmed population.
Obama was right about one thing. Mousavi was really no different. He bombed our marines. 200+ American kills on his hands, and half of the internet is rooting for the guy.
Unfortunately, the success of a strike this late in the game is doubtful. The Iranian sites are so well defended that any attacker would suffer severe losses. I have heard estimates of up to 60% of the aircraft could be lost during a strike, and that the strike would require at least 100 fighter/bombers.
Iran has an air force, advanced radar, advanced SAM capabilities. It only gets stronger each day that passes. Pilots would have to accept it as a suicide mission.
Should have been hit in ‘07 to coincide with the surge in Iraq.
dip it in cider on July 5, 2009 at 3:09 PM
Mind you. I am sure that they and all the other Muslim nations in the area would not shirk at shooting down a few on the way back from doing their dirty work. The US can always be relied upon to keep the Israelis from going on the offensive against the shooters.
davod on July 5, 2009 at 3:13 PM
-
EMP hardening of major weapon systems is big now-a-days. Not to say that Israel won’t get hurt by such an attack, but I suspect that they would still have the ability to strike a few blows of biblical proportion even after such an event. Let’s hope it doesn’t come to that.
-
http://www.blogcatalog.com/blog/refuge/1d8efc87ba1aa7652d8ef70a2af68f64
-
RalphyBoy on July 5, 2009 at 3:17 PM
And Iran is also a fiercely nationalistic country–one of the differences between Palestine and Iran you failed to mention.
Agreed with you here–Bush had the opportunity to hit back when Iran was more active in stirring the pot in Iraq. Unfortunately, by that time he spent all his political capital just keeping Iraq going.
BryanS on July 5, 2009 at 3:20 PM
The cost of such a strike to Israel will be enormous; they will take heavy losses, and depending on how heavy they are, they may find themselves less able to defend themselves in Syria, for example, were to take advantage of the opportunity to attack them.
I vaguely recall that Israel wanted to strike in 2007 but Bush didn’t want to stir the pot in Iran while Iraq was smouldering. And then there was that completely bogus intelligence report that took Bush off the hook for the remainder of his term.
ProfessorMiao on July 5, 2009 at 3:43 PM
It isn’t just weapons systems that are threatened by an EMP attack. Transportation, communications, electrical and water supply.
ProfessorMiao on July 5, 2009 at 3:46 PM
Israelis: doing the jobs Americans won’t do.
Dark-Star on July 5, 2009 at 4:47 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »