After Obama went sensible on Iraq and Afghanistan and somewhat so on indefinite detentions and Gitmo, I thought maybe our foreign policy wouldn’t turn out so bad, or at least for a little while. Now Obama’s got 3 in a row wrong.

I can’t figure out why NO ONE is sticking up for the government in Honduras that is lawfully following its own constitution and has the support of the entire government (except the would-be dicatator president).

But if Obama is really trying to head off sanctions on Iran at the first point in time when we have a chance to make headway with them, I … I … I’m flabbergasted.

Many protesters for freedom still need to be hanged.

Barry only wants to help.

What is the difference between previous US administrations keeping the Shah in power and Obama keeping the mullahs in power both of whom used repressive means to stay in power (the mullahs even more so ruthlessly)? Both the Shah and current regime were/are hated by a significant (majority?) portion of the the population. If one claims that supporting the Shah was morally wrong then why isn’t also morally wrong to support the mullah-cracy?

Now it is more like a car crash you see about to happen — you know it’s dangerous, you are close enough that might actually get hurt and you can’t do anything about it, but you simply can’t take your eyes off of it.

I just hope it ends up being a Car-b-que and not a tanker truck filled with propane!
David

He wouldn’t take one step off the plane, without being shackled, and arrested, as a meddler. Idiot!

And there’s no BETTER country to run to !!
sniff.

pambi on July 3, 2009 at 3:08 PM

“No BETTER country to run to”… yet.

If American citizens don’t wake up and realize that there’s more important things than Saturday afternoon BBQs, American Idol, and playing Wii … you’ll see that changing really quick.

If there’s a Tea Party within 100 miles of where you live and you’re skipping it, you’re part of the problem.

Do you actually believe the “voting block” is going to matter, when ACORN gets finished rigging the system?

Really?

Gregor on July 3, 2009 at 2:27 PM

Yep.

Our next election could very well end up not being any more honest than the one in Iran.

Obama’s coddling of the Mullahcracy on that and his harsh rhetoric towards Honduras, which just ejected a socialist “president” who wanted to illegally grab power for life, in that he’s supporting the wannabe dictator are very telling.

He doesn’t want to be inconsistent when he does the same things himself, ie: rigs his own re-election, and then runs for a 3rd term.

There simply isn’t any other explanation. The law hasn’t stopped him yet from doing dozens of illegal things, such as taking over the auto industry, dispossessing secured bond holders and giving their property to the unions…

Yeah well that number is not going to hold. The economy for one thing is not sitting well with any voting block other than the 40% on the government dole.
… freeus on July 3, 2009 at 1:01 PM

Do you actually believe the “voting block” is going to matter, when ACORN gets finished rigging the system?

Really?

Yeah well that number is not going to hold. The economy for one thing is not sitting well with any voting block other than the 40% on the government dole.
… freeus on July 3, 2009 at 1:01 PM

If 40% will elect the socialists because they are on the dole, the Democrats need only 11% of the other 60% to stay in power. You’ve inadvertently hit on the Democrats’ Master Plan. Make government so big that a critical percentage of businesses depend on government contracts and largesse for their prosperity or even survial. Add these numbers to the numbers on the dole and you have your permanent majority,

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

Is this not giving aid and comfort to the enemy? Do we not have more two (million) witnesses to this overt act?

What am I missing? (I’m not even going into how The Precedent is levying war aginst us, domestically)

It’s now “My president is an a**hole”

I am not weeping for my country yet but I am knashing my teeth together from it.

And the hundreds of thousands or millions of protestors in Iran a couple of weeks ago were what, Martians? Get real.

ProfessorMiao on July 3, 2009 at 1:11 PM

What’s your point? That the Iranian citizens don’t like their government? That they are less radical then the Mullahs? Or, are you suggesting that they love Jews and would gladly be loving neighbors with Christians and Jews if given the chance?

The first two are obviously true, but those points have absolutely nothing to do with my statement. The third point, if you believe it, is lunacy.

The reality is, that true Islam does not allow honest peace with Israel. A Muslim who loves Jews or Christians, is basically making up their own religion.

Obama is a true Muslim. If you want to deny that, then you’re going to find yourself constantly scratching your head and claiming that “nothing makes sense.” As soon as you accept that as being the reality, then you’ll suddenly find everything magically making sense.