<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WaPo a WaPimp?; Update: WaPo&#8217;s Spitzer moment? Update: WaPo confirms; Update: Hard out here for a pimp</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/wapo-a-wapimp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/wapo-a-wapimp/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 06:48:42 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Buy soma.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/wapo-a-wapimp/comment-page-2/#comment-2502723</link>
		<dc:creator>Buy soma.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57925#comment-2502723</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Buy soma....&lt;/strong&gt;

Buy soma....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Buy soma&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Buy soma&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Anchoress — A First Things Blog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/wapo-a-wapimp/comment-page-2/#comment-2384672</link>
		<dc:creator>The Anchoress — A First Things Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 20:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57925#comment-2384672</guid>
		<description>[...] Miffed that Palin is taking the WaPo pimping scandal off the front page: Don&#8217;t worry, it was never going to be there for long! 4:38 PM She&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Miffed that Palin is taking the WaPo pimping scandal off the front page: Don&#8217;t worry, it was never going to be there for long! 4:38 PM She&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Who were the WaPo&#8217;s dancing girls?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/wapo-a-wapimp/comment-page-2/#comment-2382289</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Who were the WaPo&#8217;s dancing girls?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57925#comment-2382289</guid>
		<description>[...] Times, no doubt licking its chops over the Washington Post&#8217;s stumble, followed up on the WaPimp story from yesterday to find out who actually agreed to attend Katherine Weymouth&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Times, no doubt licking its chops over the Washington Post&#8217;s stumble, followed up on the WaPimp story from yesterday to find out who actually agreed to attend Katherine Weymouth&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: itsspideyman</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/wapo-a-wapimp/comment-page-2/#comment-2382282</link>
		<dc:creator>itsspideyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57925#comment-2382282</guid>
		<description>They should do it the modern way, in a theatre.

Just bring your raincoat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should do it the modern way, in a theatre.</p>
<p>Just bring your raincoat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WaPo Tries Its Hand At Pimping, Fails &#171; Beltway Snark</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/wapo-a-wapimp/comment-page-2/#comment-2382183</link>
		<dc:creator>WaPo Tries Its Hand At Pimping, Fails &#171; Beltway Snark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57925#comment-2382183</guid>
		<description>[...] Tries Its Hand At Pimping,&#160;Fails  Jump to Comments  Step #1 in successful pimping; don&#8217;t print fliers detailing your services. A square might get ahold of one of those fliers and show it to The Man. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tries Its Hand At Pimping,&nbsp;Fails  Jump to Comments  Step #1 in successful pimping; don&#8217;t print fliers detailing your services. A square might get ahold of one of those fliers and show it to The Man. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Washington Compost Offers Access for Quarter Mil - Southern Maryland Community Forums</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/wapo-a-wapimp/comment-page-2/#comment-2382061</link>
		<dc:creator>Washington Compost Offers Access for Quarter Mil - Southern Maryland Community Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57925#comment-2382061</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the good name of The Washington Post. It certainly suggested that, and much more.     Hot Air  Blog Archive  WaPo a WaPimp?; Update: WaPos Spitzer moment? Update: WaPo confirms; Updat&#8230;  They really thought they wouldn&#8217;t get caught?   __________________ I don&#8217;t accept the false [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff from WI</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/wapo-a-wapimp/comment-page-2/#comment-2382041</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff from WI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57925#comment-2382041</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;For fifty bucks I can get them into a peep booth with Bawney Frank

guntotinglibertarian on July 2, 2009 at 10:55 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

LOL...you hang out with Barney???  At peep shows??  LOLOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>For fifty bucks I can get them into a peep booth with Bawney Frank</p>
<p>guntotinglibertarian on July 2, 2009 at 10:55 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>LOL&#8230;you hang out with Barney???  At peep shows??  LOLOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Greenroom &#187; Forum Archive &#187; Great Deals At The Washington Post</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/wapo-a-wapimp/comment-page-2/#comment-2381495</link>
		<dc:creator>The Greenroom &#187; Forum Archive &#187; Great Deals At The Washington Post</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 04:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57925#comment-2381495</guid>
		<description>[...] across the political spectrum condemned the idea; the Post&#8217;s ombudsman called the story a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] across the political spectrum condemned the idea; the Post&#8217;s ombudsman called the story a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Outraged WaPo publisher: &#8216;We are sluts, not whores &#8212; there&#8217;s a difference!&#8217; — Cynthia Yockey, A Conservative Lesbian</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/wapo-a-wapimp/comment-page-2/#comment-2381250</link>
		<dc:creator>Outraged WaPo publisher: &#8216;We are sluts, not whores &#8212; there&#8217;s a difference!&#8217; — Cynthia Yockey, A Conservative Lesbian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 03:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57925#comment-2381250</guid>
		<description>[...] Morrissey at Hot Air follows the story through its twists and turns today here. Turns out the Washington Post is losing money and its business/marketing division doesn&#8217;t [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Morrissey at Hot Air follows the story through its twists and turns today here. Turns out the Washington Post is losing money and its business/marketing division doesn&#8217;t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolf Howling</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/wapo-a-wapimp/comment-page-2/#comment-2381130</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolf Howling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 03:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57925#comment-2381130</guid>
		<description>New York has its Grey Lady, now Washington has its painted one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York has its Grey Lady, now Washington has its painted one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guntotinglibertarian</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/wapo-a-wapimp/comment-page-2/#comment-2381107</link>
		<dc:creator>guntotinglibertarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 02:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57925#comment-2381107</guid>
		<description>For fifty bucks I can get them into a peep booth with Bawney Frank</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For fifty bucks I can get them into a peep booth with Bawney Frank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TN Mom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/wapo-a-wapimp/comment-page-2/#comment-2381038</link>
		<dc:creator>TN Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 02:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57925#comment-2381038</guid>
		<description>WaPo subscribers do, of course, realize they are sloppy seconds, no?  First was NBC, then ABC, and steady beau the NYT....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WaPo subscribers do, of course, realize they are sloppy seconds, no?  First was NBC, then ABC, and steady beau the NYT&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TN Mom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/wapo-a-wapimp/comment-page-2/#comment-2380949</link>
		<dc:creator>TN Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 02:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57925#comment-2380949</guid>
		<description>Classified Ads:

For a Good Time, call 1-900WaPo.

Sexy. Hot. Salacious details on Health Care reform from White House insiders! 

Please have your credit card ready. The cost is $25,000.00, per hour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Classified Ads:</p>
<p>For a Good Time, call 1-900WaPo.</p>
<p>Sexy. Hot. Salacious details on Health Care reform from White House insiders! </p>
<p>Please have your credit card ready. The cost is $25,000.00, per hour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/wapo-a-wapimp/comment-page-2/#comment-2380871</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 02:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57925#comment-2380871</guid>
		<description>I take this as a sign of just how incestuous the links between the press and the Administration have gotten.  For them to be so bold shows us just how smitten they are.  Like Governor Sanford and his Argentinian affair, they&#039;ve met their soul mate and they just don&#039;t care what anybody thinks anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take this as a sign of just how incestuous the links between the press and the Administration have gotten.  For them to be so bold shows us just how smitten they are.  Like Governor Sanford and his Argentinian affair, they&#8217;ve met their soul mate and they just don&#8217;t care what anybody thinks anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody's Place</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/wapo-a-wapimp/comment-page-2/#comment-2380862</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody's Place</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 02:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57925#comment-2380862</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Washington Post Pimps Obama Officials To Lobbyists...&lt;/strong&gt;

Via The Politico: For $25,000 to $250,000, The Washington Post is offering lobbyists and association executives off the record, non-confrontational access to “those powerful few” — Obama administration officials, members of Congress, and the pape...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Washington Post Pimps Obama Officials To Lobbyists&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Via The Politico: For $25,000 to $250,000, The Washington Post is offering lobbyists and association executives off the record, non-confrontational access to “those powerful few” — Obama administration officials, members of Congress, and the pape&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drunyan8315</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/wapo-a-wapimp/comment-page-2/#comment-2380720</link>
		<dc:creator>drunyan8315</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 01:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57925#comment-2380720</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Hey, politicians and WH officials were &quot;guaranteed&quot; to be there at the salons!&lt;/strong&gt;

The word &quot;guaranteed&quot; is usually not used lightly by business people when the price of the product is $250K a pop!  A few questions are in order: 

1. How was the guaranteed presence of senior WH officials and elected representatives secured? 

2. Was it perhaps understood that with this lucrative new revenue stream, WaPo executives would certainly be able to make some generous campaign contributions, whether in dollars, or &quot;in kind&quot; i.e., in the form of sympathetic coverage in the WaPo?

3. Will the DoJ direct the FBI to open an investigation into was seems to be prima facie evidence of influence peddling? 

4. Who gave the White House officials the green light to partiicpate in these salons, in as much as the value of such a participation is clearly derived from their position in the administration, and to appear without such permission would obviously be a firing offense in any legitimate business or any other government agency? 

5. Oh, and what were the names of the officals and elected officials whose presence and attention was being sold by the WaPo and purchased by the cusotmers? 

I am just a dilletante at contriving questions to be asked by an investigative reporter, so I hope others will contribute interesting questions.  Of course, the liklihood of the anyone in the media asking them would seem to be laughably short of &quot;slim&quot;! 

Our watchdogs have taken jobs as lapdogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Hey, politicians and WH officials were &#8220;guaranteed&#8221; to be there at the salons!</strong></p>
<p>The word &#8220;guaranteed&#8221; is usually not used lightly by business people when the price of the product is $250K a pop!  A few questions are in order: </p>
<p>1. How was the guaranteed presence of senior WH officials and elected representatives secured? </p>
<p>2. Was it perhaps understood that with this lucrative new revenue stream, WaPo executives would certainly be able to make some generous campaign contributions, whether in dollars, or &#8220;in kind&#8221; i.e., in the form of sympathetic coverage in the WaPo?</p>
<p>3. Will the DoJ direct the FBI to open an investigation into was seems to be prima facie evidence of influence peddling? </p>
<p>4. Who gave the White House officials the green light to partiicpate in these salons, in as much as the value of such a participation is clearly derived from their position in the administration, and to appear without such permission would obviously be a firing offense in any legitimate business or any other government agency? </p>
<p>5. Oh, and what were the names of the officals and elected officials whose presence and attention was being sold by the WaPo and purchased by the cusotmers? </p>
<p>I am just a dilletante at contriving questions to be asked by an investigative reporter, so I hope others will contribute interesting questions.  Of course, the liklihood of the anyone in the media asking them would seem to be laughably short of &#8220;slim&#8221;! </p>
<p>Our watchdogs have taken jobs as lapdogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4shoes</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/wapo-a-wapimp/comment-page-2/#comment-2380431</link>
		<dc:creator>4shoes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57925#comment-2380431</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The two oldest professions are now joined.

theCork on July 2, 2009 at 12:17 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ya mean prostitution and gossip?   But wait, was gossip a profession?  I&#039;m confused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The two oldest professions are now joined.</p>
<p>theCork on July 2, 2009 at 12:17 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Ya mean prostitution and gossip?   But wait, was gossip a profession?  I&#8217;m confused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Independence Day T-minus 2 &#171; Obi&#8217;s Sister</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/wapo-a-wapimp/comment-page-2/#comment-2380347</link>
		<dc:creator>Independence Day T-minus 2 &#171; Obi&#8217;s Sister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57925#comment-2380347</guid>
		<description>[...] out pimps and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] out pimps and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unclesmrgol</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/wapo-a-wapimp/comment-page-2/#comment-2380327</link>
		<dc:creator>unclesmrgol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57925#comment-2380327</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;OK, OK, perhaps it isn’t fair to call the Washington Post a pimp for the White House. Maybe it would be better to call this what it is — prostitution of the press in order to gain cash and sell itself out for access, both for itself and for its clients.&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

Wrong, Ed. There is this little gem of a paragraph in the Politico article — quoted from the Post advertisment:&lt;blockquote&gt;“Underwriting Opportunity: An evening with the right people can alter the debate,” says the one-page flier. “Underwrite and participate in this intimate and exclusive Washington Post Salon, an off-the-record dinner and discussion at the home of CEO and Publisher Katharine Weymouth. … Bring your organization’s CEO or executive director literally to the table. &lt;b&gt;Interact with key Obama administration and congressional leaders.&lt;/b&gt;“&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So it’s not just the Democrats in the White House — it’s the ones in Congress too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>OK, OK, perhaps it isn’t fair to call the Washington Post a pimp for the White House. Maybe it would be better to call this what it is — prostitution of the press in order to gain cash and sell itself out for access, both for itself and for its clients.</p></blockquote>
<p>Wrong, Ed. There is this little gem of a paragraph in the Politico article — quoted from the Post advertisment:<br />
<blockquote>“Underwriting Opportunity: An evening with the right people can alter the debate,” says the one-page flier. “Underwrite and participate in this intimate and exclusive Washington Post Salon, an off-the-record dinner and discussion at the home of CEO and Publisher Katharine Weymouth. … Bring your organization’s CEO or executive director literally to the table. <b>Interact with key Obama administration and congressional leaders.</b>“</p></blockquote>
<p>So it’s not just the Democrats in the White House — it’s the ones in Congress too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guardian</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/wapo-a-wapimp/comment-page-2/#comment-2380165</link>
		<dc:creator>Guardian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57925#comment-2380165</guid>
		<description>We are terribly sorry..........that we got caught.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are terribly sorry&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.that we got caught.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SilverStar830</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/wapo-a-wapimp/comment-page-2/#comment-2380123</link>
		<dc:creator>SilverStar830</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57925#comment-2380123</guid>
		<description>Wow. Our country&#039;s &#039;Press&#039; has been reduced to this? And they only &#039;cancelled&#039; the program once they got outed?

Okay. My shock and dismay has passed. That took about 2 seconds. That&#039;s how long it took to dawn on me that this should come as no surprise. It is, after all, the &lt;em&gt;era of Obama&lt;/em&gt; and the first filibuster proof liberal Congress since Jimmy &#039;I-HATE-AMERICA&#039; Carter was POTUS. I&#039;m still getting used to this. But at the same time, it&#039;s like deja vous all over again.

Our 1st Amendment U.S. Constitutional Right to &quot;Freedom of the Press&quot; needs some serious reexamination. Similar to &#039;non-profit&#039; entities that get tax exemptions if they stay within certain guidelines, the &#039;Press&#039; should not enjoy the rights and privileges of our 1st Amendment if they&#039;re pimping &#039;Freedom&#039; to off the record, non-confrontational access to “those powerful few” — Obama administration officials, members of Congress, and the paper’s own reporters and editors for a huge profit.

MY United States of America, it&#039;s reprobate &#039;elected&#039; leaders, and our now newly nationalized press under Barackus Casear is becoming as disgusting and reprehensible as any 3rd world dictatorship run country.

Instead of opposing socialism, oppression, and fascism, my &#039;elected&#039; government not only now condones it, they slather themselves with it, they roll around in it, and no doubt they are busy little bee&#039;s filling their pockets and off-shore accounts with it.

Happy 4th of July folks. Enjoy it and celebrate it while you can before it becomes a nationalized taboo to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Our country&#8217;s &#8216;Press&#8217; has been reduced to this? And they only &#8216;cancelled&#8217; the program once they got outed?</p>
<p>Okay. My shock and dismay has passed. That took about 2 seconds. That&#8217;s how long it took to dawn on me that this should come as no surprise. It is, after all, the <em>era of Obama</em> and the first filibuster proof liberal Congress since Jimmy &#8216;I-HATE-AMERICA&#8217; Carter was POTUS. I&#8217;m still getting used to this. But at the same time, it&#8217;s like deja vous all over again.</p>
<p>Our 1st Amendment U.S. Constitutional Right to &#8220;Freedom of the Press&#8221; needs some serious reexamination. Similar to &#8216;non-profit&#8217; entities that get tax exemptions if they stay within certain guidelines, the &#8216;Press&#8217; should not enjoy the rights and privileges of our 1st Amendment if they&#8217;re pimping &#8216;Freedom&#8217; to off the record, non-confrontational access to “those powerful few” — Obama administration officials, members of Congress, and the paper’s own reporters and editors for a huge profit.</p>
<p>MY United States of America, it&#8217;s reprobate &#8216;elected&#8217; leaders, and our now newly nationalized press under Barackus Casear is becoming as disgusting and reprehensible as any 3rd world dictatorship run country.</p>
<p>Instead of opposing socialism, oppression, and fascism, my &#8216;elected&#8217; government not only now condones it, they slather themselves with it, they roll around in it, and no doubt they are busy little bee&#8217;s filling their pockets and off-shore accounts with it.</p>
<p>Happy 4th of July folks. Enjoy it and celebrate it while you can before it becomes a nationalized taboo to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FireBlogger</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/wapo-a-wapimp/comment-page-2/#comment-2379948</link>
		<dc:creator>FireBlogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57925#comment-2379948</guid>
		<description>The pimps will just go to the side streets instead of putting out fliers on main street.
It is a win-win for Obama and the Washington Post. As such it will not stop. It will just go underground.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The pimps will just go to the side streets instead of putting out fliers on main street.<br />
It is a win-win for Obama and the Washington Post. As such it will not stop. It will just go underground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Video: Michelle smacks WaPo for big pimpin&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/wapo-a-wapimp/comment-page-2/#comment-2379945</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Video: Michelle smacks WaPo for big pimpin&#8217;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57925#comment-2379945</guid>
		<description>[...] Stuart Varney says, the most amazing thing about this is that they actually put out a flier advertising the salons. No whispering about pay-for-play over brandy in smoke-filled rooms for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stuart Varney says, the most amazing thing about this is that they actually put out a flier advertising the salons. No whispering about pay-for-play over brandy in smoke-filled rooms for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Washington Post whores itself out to lobbyists at &#8220;salons.&#8221;&#160;&#124;&#160;Conservative Political Report</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/wapo-a-wapimp/comment-page-2/#comment-2379816</link>
		<dc:creator>Washington Post whores itself out to lobbyists at &#8220;salons.&#8221;&#160;&#124;&#160;Conservative Political Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57925#comment-2379816</guid>
		<description>[...] Hot Air &#124; WaPo a WaPimp?; Update: WaPo’s Spitzer moment? Update: WaPo confirms; Update: Hard out here for a ... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hot Air | WaPo a WaPimp?; Update: WaPo’s Spitzer moment? Update: WaPo confirms; Update: Hard out here for a &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al in St. Lou</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/wapo-a-wapimp/comment-page-2/#comment-2379741</link>
		<dc:creator>Al in St. Lou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57925#comment-2379741</guid>
		<description>OMG! LOL! What clowns!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG! LOL! What clowns!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
