<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unemployment creeps up to 9.5%</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/unemployment-creeps-up-to-95/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/unemployment-creeps-up-to-95/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:11:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Unemployment Is Now At 9.5% &#124; Support Your Local Gunfighter</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/unemployment-creeps-up-to-95/comment-page-4/#comment-2393403</link>
		<dc:creator>Unemployment Is Now At 9.5% &#124; Support Your Local Gunfighter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 15:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57933#comment-2393403</guid>
		<description>[...] Three months ago, Obama bragged that his stimulus had begun to create a “rush” to hire construction workers. Since then, the construction industry has lost over 120,000 jobs, and this month’s report shows that trend accelerating at a season when construction should normally be hiring. (H/T &#8211; Hot Air) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Three months ago, Obama bragged that his stimulus had begun to create a “rush” to hire construction workers. Since then, the construction industry has lost over 120,000 jobs, and this month’s report shows that trend accelerating at a season when construction should normally be hiring. (H/T &#8211; Hot Air) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The average job loss per month is 4000 per Obama? &#124; Fire Andrea Mitchell!</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/unemployment-creeps-up-to-95/comment-page-4/#comment-2391560</link>
		<dc:creator>The average job loss per month is 4000 per Obama? &#124; Fire Andrea Mitchell!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 00:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57933#comment-2391560</guid>
		<description>[...] didn&#8217;t write this. He SAID this during his propoganda speech on TV. Problems with math? We lost 467,000 jobs in June, which is far above 4,000 per month this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] didn&#8217;t write this. He SAID this during his propoganda speech on TV. Problems with math? We lost 467,000 jobs in June, which is far above 4,000 per month this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mmcnamer1</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/unemployment-creeps-up-to-95/comment-page-4/#comment-2389551</link>
		<dc:creator>mmcnamer1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 15:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57933#comment-2389551</guid>
		<description>Wait just 1 minute; didn&#039;t this clown say it wouldn&#039;t go above 8.8% if his pork bill was passed?
Neither Dumbo or his advisor&#039;s have ANY economic sense!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait just 1 minute; didn&#8217;t this clown say it wouldn&#8217;t go above 8.8% if his pork bill was passed?<br />
Neither Dumbo or his advisor&#8217;s have ANY economic sense!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ama</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/unemployment-creeps-up-to-95/comment-page-4/#comment-2382931</link>
		<dc:creator>ama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57933#comment-2382931</guid>
		<description>9.5% is the official number.

The real number is likely double the government number.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>9.5% is the official number.</p>
<p>The real number is likely double the government number.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sweet_Thang</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/unemployment-creeps-up-to-95/comment-page-4/#comment-2382859</link>
		<dc:creator>Sweet_Thang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57933#comment-2382859</guid>
		<description>So THAT&#039;s what a &lt;strong&gt;funemployment line &lt;/strong&gt;looks like!

No thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So THAT&#8217;s what a <strong>funemployment line </strong>looks like!</p>
<p>No thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirty Democrats &#187; President Obama’s Trifecta Of Doom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/unemployment-creeps-up-to-95/comment-page-4/#comment-2382648</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirty Democrats &#187; President Obama’s Trifecta Of Doom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 15:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57933#comment-2382648</guid>
		<description>[...] Ed Morrissey says that Obama’s ‘porkulus policies’ have ‘utterly failed:’ Three months ago, Obama bragged that his stimulus had begun to create a ‘rush’ to hire construction workers. Since then, the construction industry has lost over 120,000 jobs, and this month’s report shows that trend accelerating at a season when construction should normally be hiring. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ed Morrissey says that Obama’s ‘porkulus policies’ have ‘utterly failed:’ Three months ago, Obama bragged that his stimulus had begun to create a ‘rush’ to hire construction workers. Since then, the construction industry has lost over 120,000 jobs, and this month’s report shows that trend accelerating at a season when construction should normally be hiring. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mmcnamer1</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/unemployment-creeps-up-to-95/comment-page-4/#comment-2382378</link>
		<dc:creator>mmcnamer1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57933#comment-2382378</guid>
		<description>This was the kind of Change I was afraid of.
I think it&#039;s time to grass root a tea party for DC 7/4/10. Make it so big, NO ONE will be able to ignore it, especially the Bamster and his loony friends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was the kind of Change I was afraid of.<br />
I think it&#8217;s time to grass root a tea party for DC 7/4/10. Make it so big, NO ONE will be able to ignore it, especially the Bamster and his loony friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How much more time will Obama get? &#124; Radio Vice Online</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/unemployment-creeps-up-to-95/comment-page-4/#comment-2382241</link>
		<dc:creator>How much more time will Obama get? &#124; Radio Vice Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57933#comment-2382241</guid>
		<description>[...] on the unemployment numbers (9.5%) and the fact that the only sector that is creating jobs is the government sector. As I outlined yesterday on the air &#8230; that&#8217;s a dead end recovery. Only the private [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on the unemployment numbers (9.5%) and the fact that the only sector that is creating jobs is the government sector. As I outlined yesterday on the air &#8230; that&#8217;s a dead end recovery. Only the private [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluegrass</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/unemployment-creeps-up-to-95/comment-page-4/#comment-2382143</link>
		<dc:creator>bluegrass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57933#comment-2382143</guid>
		<description>CHANGE &amp; HOPE


MY A$$</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CHANGE &amp; HOPE</p>
<p>MY A$$</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balloon Juice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Another Edition of Krugman is Probably Right But He Still Frustrates Me</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/unemployment-creeps-up-to-95/comment-page-4/#comment-2382130</link>
		<dc:creator>Balloon Juice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Another Edition of Krugman is Probably Right But He Still Frustrates Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57933#comment-2382130</guid>
		<description>[...] the opposition, which stood by and did nothing when Bush exploded the deficit in peactetime, and then write things like this (and this really is a wingnut tour de force- almost every sentence contains multiple falsehoods, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the opposition, which stood by and did nothing when Bush exploded the deficit in peactetime, and then write things like this (and this really is a wingnut tour de force- almost every sentence contains multiple falsehoods, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff from WI</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/unemployment-creeps-up-to-95/comment-page-4/#comment-2382013</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff from WI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 10:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57933#comment-2382013</guid>
		<description>I can confirm all your suspicions about this lying Troll AnninCA.

I know she voted for Obama. She claims she voted for Palin and now she even “likes” Palin (even though AnninCA is rabid over abortion).

&lt;blockquote&gt;AnninCA was all over the PUMA site “No Quarter” posting very frequently during the primary and election cycle. If she was truly a PUMA, and voted McCain, then why would they try to chase her off the site. She drove the PUMAS crazy trolling on No Quarter.

So trust your instincts, she is a fraud. A concern troll. I know.

Geochelone on July 3, 2009 at 2:57 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It&#039;s best if you believe no one on a blog. Take each post at face value.
What really gets me is the fact that many people haven&#039;t figured out that:

A: You need not read anything from a particular person.
B: You need not comment about anything written by a particular person.
C: You need not respond to anything written TO YOU by a particular person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can confirm all your suspicions about this lying Troll AnninCA.</p>
<p>I know she voted for Obama. She claims she voted for Palin and now she even “likes” Palin (even though AnninCA is rabid over abortion).</p>
<blockquote><p>AnninCA was all over the PUMA site “No Quarter” posting very frequently during the primary and election cycle. If she was truly a PUMA, and voted McCain, then why would they try to chase her off the site. She drove the PUMAS crazy trolling on No Quarter.</p>
<p>So trust your instincts, she is a fraud. A concern troll. I know.</p>
<p>Geochelone on July 3, 2009 at 2:57 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s best if you believe no one on a blog. Take each post at face value.<br />
What really gets me is the fact that many people haven&#8217;t figured out that:</p>
<p>A: You need not read anything from a particular person.<br />
B: You need not comment about anything written by a particular person.<br />
C: You need not respond to anything written TO YOU by a particular person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Strident Conservative</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/unemployment-creeps-up-to-95/comment-page-4/#comment-2381928</link>
		<dc:creator>The Strident Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 07:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57933#comment-2381928</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Where Are The Jobs Barry?...&lt;/strong&gt;


Obama said the $787 billion stimulus plan would keep unemployment under 8%. He said that it would create 3.7 million jobs by the end of 2010.
Today&#8217;s unemployment number is at a decades high 9.5%. The economy has lost nearly 2 million jobs since...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Where Are The Jobs Barry?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Obama said the $787 billion stimulus plan would keep unemployment under 8%. He said that it would create 3.7 million jobs by the end of 2010.<br />
Today&#8217;s unemployment number is at a decades high 9.5%. The economy has lost nearly 2 million jobs since&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geochelone</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/unemployment-creeps-up-to-95/comment-page-4/#comment-2381918</link>
		<dc:creator>Geochelone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 06:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57933#comment-2381918</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;And I didn’t vote for Obama.

AnninCA on July 2, 2009 at 1:24 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;Well Im not buying the “I didnt vote for Obama” crap lol…sorry. Its obvious you did, but thats beside the point. Everyone here knows you did. Its very evident.

Ann…dont you think this economy is just clicking along great? Its just awesome Obamanomics baby!

Jackson1227 on July 2, 2009 at 1:32 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I can confirm all your suspicions about this lying Troll AnninCA.

I know she voted for Obama. She claims she voted for Palin and now she even &quot;likes&quot; Palin (even though AnninCA is rabid over abortion). 

AnninCA was all over the PUMA site &quot;No Quarter&quot; posting very frequently during the primary and election cycle. If she was truly a PUMA, and voted McCain, then why would they try to chase her off the site. She drove the PUMAS crazy trolling on No Quarter.

So trust your instincts, she is a fraud. A concern troll. I know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And I didn’t vote for Obama.</p>
<p>AnninCA on July 2, 2009 at 1:24 PM</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Well Im not buying the “I didnt vote for Obama” crap lol…sorry. Its obvious you did, but thats beside the point. Everyone here knows you did. Its very evident.</p>
<p>Ann…dont you think this economy is just clicking along great? Its just awesome Obamanomics baby!</p>
<p>Jackson1227 on July 2, 2009 at 1:32 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I can confirm all your suspicions about this lying Troll AnninCA.</p>
<p>I know she voted for Obama. She claims she voted for Palin and now she even &#8220;likes&#8221; Palin (even though AnninCA is rabid over abortion). </p>
<p>AnninCA was all over the PUMA site &#8220;No Quarter&#8221; posting very frequently during the primary and election cycle. If she was truly a PUMA, and voted McCain, then why would they try to chase her off the site. She drove the PUMAS crazy trolling on No Quarter.</p>
<p>So trust your instincts, she is a fraud. A concern troll. I know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dollayo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/unemployment-creeps-up-to-95/comment-page-4/#comment-2381442</link>
		<dc:creator>Dollayo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 03:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57933#comment-2381442</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I most definitely enjoyed attending my teaparty, and that has nothing to do with my stance on public option healthcare.
AnninCA on July 2, 2009 at 4:21 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;



First off, let&#039;s not use leftist speech here. The &quot;public option&quot; is government run health insurance, private insurance is the real public option. What you support is the government becoming an insurance company. The only difference is that the government can write off their net losses to the taxpayers while private companies can&#039;t. This gives the government an unfair advantage to competitors in the private market and will drive the private health insurance companies out of the market. As the government option becomes the only option it soon becomes economically unsustainable and drives our government into massive debt. Don&#039;t you think that a better solution is to expand medicare to help those who cannot get approved for health care in the private market instead of forcing everyone into a public system?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I most definitely enjoyed attending my teaparty, and that has nothing to do with my stance on public option healthcare.<br />
AnninCA on July 2, 2009 at 4:21 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>First off, let&#8217;s not use leftist speech here. The &#8220;public option&#8221; is government run health insurance, private insurance is the real public option. What you support is the government becoming an insurance company. The only difference is that the government can write off their net losses to the taxpayers while private companies can&#8217;t. This gives the government an unfair advantage to competitors in the private market and will drive the private health insurance companies out of the market. As the government option becomes the only option it soon becomes economically unsustainable and drives our government into massive debt. Don&#8217;t you think that a better solution is to expand medicare to help those who cannot get approved for health care in the private market instead of forcing everyone into a public system?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guntotinglibertarian</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/unemployment-creeps-up-to-95/comment-page-4/#comment-2381419</link>
		<dc:creator>guntotinglibertarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 03:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57933#comment-2381419</guid>
		<description>So unemployment &quot;crept up&quot; from 9.4 to 9.5 percent, hmm?

Thank heaven we have an honest, politically-independent Labor Department to provide us with the good news.  

Looks like that stimulus is creating and saving, huh?  Otherwise, gosh, this month&#039;s number was looking like it was gonna be over the dreaded 10% mark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So unemployment &#8220;crept up&#8221; from 9.4 to 9.5 percent, hmm?</p>
<p>Thank heaven we have an honest, politically-independent Labor Department to provide us with the good news.  </p>
<p>Looks like that stimulus is creating and saving, huh?  Otherwise, gosh, this month&#8217;s number was looking like it was gonna be over the dreaded 10% mark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: winteryknight</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/unemployment-creeps-up-to-95/comment-page-4/#comment-2381202</link>
		<dc:creator>winteryknight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 03:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57933#comment-2381202</guid>
		<description>Not sure if you guys saw this, but males are being particularly victimized by the current recession - manufacturing and construction are being hit hard. 

But female-dominated industries like health care and education are fine - they&#039;ve added jobs!

It turns out that women&#039;s groups LOBBIED Obama to avoid helping men, as well:
http://www.openmarket.org/2009/06/25/obamas-job-killing-stimulus-package-replaced-investments-with-welfare-out-of-political-correctness/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure if you guys saw this, but males are being particularly victimized by the current recession &#8211; manufacturing and construction are being hit hard. </p>
<p>But female-dominated industries like health care and education are fine &#8211; they&#8217;ve added jobs!</p>
<p>It turns out that women&#8217;s groups LOBBIED Obama to avoid helping men, as well:<br />
<a href="http://www.openmarket.org/2009/06/25/obamas-job-killing-stimulus-package-replaced-investments-with-welfare-out-of-political-correctness/" rel="nofollow">http://www.openmarket.org/2009/06/25/obamas-job-killing-stimulus-package-replaced-investments-with-welfare-out-of-political-correctness/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Families Cut Way Back on Travel, but Not Congress: All-Time Highs in Spending Taxpayers&#8217; Money on Travel in Democrat Congress &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/unemployment-creeps-up-to-95/comment-page-4/#comment-2381051</link>
		<dc:creator>American Families Cut Way Back on Travel, but Not Congress: All-Time Highs in Spending Taxpayers&#8217; Money on Travel in Democrat Congress &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 02:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57933#comment-2381051</guid>
		<description>[...] Some of the blog pieces posted today&#8230; read with caution: a few may make your blood boil: Michelle Malkin: New unemployment numbers: Quick, blame Bush! Gateway Pundit: As Nation Suffers&#8211; Pelosi-Reid Congress Increase Travel Costs By 50% During Recession Hot Air: Dem control of Congress spikes junket travel 50% and Poll: Obama slipping further on economy and Unemployment creeps up to 9.5% [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some of the blog pieces posted today&#8230; read with caution: a few may make your blood boil: Michelle Malkin: New unemployment numbers: Quick, blame Bush! Gateway Pundit: As Nation Suffers&#8211; Pelosi-Reid Congress Increase Travel Costs By 50% During Recession Hot Air: Dem control of Congress spikes junket travel 50% and Poll: Obama slipping further on economy and Unemployment creeps up to 9.5% [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HellCat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/unemployment-creeps-up-to-95/comment-page-4/#comment-2380925</link>
		<dc:creator>HellCat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 02:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57933#comment-2380925</guid>
		<description>I tried to warn people about Obiteme during the campaign. 

Now that I have lost my job due to Obamonomics, the first thing moonbats say to me (in a hopenchange whiney voice) is, &quot;I bet you&#039;re glad our messiah has increased your unemployment benefits through the stimulus package.&quot; I tell them, &quot;It&#039;s the least our idiot president could do after trashing the economy!&quot; They don&#039;t even let me finish my explanation before they start breathing heavily, their heads start spinning and the subject is changed stat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried to warn people about Obiteme during the campaign. </p>
<p>Now that I have lost my job due to Obamonomics, the first thing moonbats say to me (in a hopenchange whiney voice) is, &#8220;I bet you&#8217;re glad our messiah has increased your unemployment benefits through the stimulus package.&#8221; I tell them, &#8220;It&#8217;s the least our idiot president could do after trashing the economy!&#8221; They don&#8217;t even let me finish my explanation before they start breathing heavily, their heads start spinning and the subject is changed stat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unemployment rises and faith in Obama drops &#171; Wellsy&#8217;s World</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/unemployment-creeps-up-to-95/comment-page-4/#comment-2380793</link>
		<dc:creator>Unemployment rises and faith in Obama drops &#171; Wellsy&#8217;s World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 01:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57933#comment-2380793</guid>
		<description>[...] have given up looking or settled for part-time work, is 16.5%, the highest since 1994. It&#8217;s a bleak picture right now on the economic front, and the many who are still employed ought to feel [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have given up looking or settled for part-time work, is 16.5%, the highest since 1994. It&#8217;s a bleak picture right now on the economic front, and the many who are still employed ought to feel [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right4life</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/unemployment-creeps-up-to-95/comment-page-4/#comment-2380747</link>
		<dc:creator>right4life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 01:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57933#comment-2380747</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;After the Dems pass Cap N Tax, these numbers will skyrocket, and we’ll wish we were living in the Great Depression when times where great.

Friendly21 on July 2, 2009 at 7:00 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

very true, the great depression was a deflationary depression...ours will be an inflationary depression  ala zimbabwe...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>After the Dems pass Cap N Tax, these numbers will skyrocket, and we’ll wish we were living in the Great Depression when times where great.</p>
<p>Friendly21 on July 2, 2009 at 7:00 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>very true, the great depression was a deflationary depression&#8230;ours will be an inflationary depression  ala zimbabwe&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angryed</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/unemployment-creeps-up-to-95/comment-page-4/#comment-2380545</link>
		<dc:creator>angryed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57933#comment-2380545</guid>
		<description>Unemployment rate is not based on who gets benefits or who files for benefits. 

From BLS.gov:

&lt;em&gt;Persons are classified as unemployed if they do not have a job, have actively looked for work in the prior 4 weeks, and are currently available for work &lt;/em&gt;

So someone who has been out of work for a year but decided to stop looking for work 32 days ago is not counted as unemployed. It&#039;s a stupid, subjective measure. And it&#039;s even more useless because it is all done via a poll of a few thousand people every month. Yes that&#039;s right, the govt makes some calls, asks people if they are working or not, and that&#039;s how they get the unemployment rate. And it&#039;s not like a poll can be distorted to get the results you want....NO, that&#039;s crazy talk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unemployment rate is not based on who gets benefits or who files for benefits. </p>
<p>From BLS.gov:</p>
<p><em>Persons are classified as unemployed if they do not have a job, have actively looked for work in the prior 4 weeks, and are currently available for work </em></p>
<p>So someone who has been out of work for a year but decided to stop looking for work 32 days ago is not counted as unemployed. It&#8217;s a stupid, subjective measure. And it&#8217;s even more useless because it is all done via a poll of a few thousand people every month. Yes that&#8217;s right, the govt makes some calls, asks people if they are working or not, and that&#8217;s how they get the unemployment rate. And it&#8217;s not like a poll can be distorted to get the results you want&#8230;.NO, that&#8217;s crazy talk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: highhopes</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/unemployment-creeps-up-to-95/comment-page-4/#comment-2380480</link>
		<dc:creator>highhopes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57933#comment-2380480</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; Forcasts I heard several days ago were for the offical number to approach 15% - so the actual number will be far higher than 20.

Friendly21 on July 2, 2009 at 7:06 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;


Obama will change the reporting criteria before that happens.  Americans, more than most cultures place importance in &quot;what you do.&quot;  He can&#039;t afford to have nearly a quarter (using the unreported numbers) of Americans dissatisfied with their lot in life.  Dissatisfied Americans do not vote for the status quo which is what Obama is seeking to instititionalize.  Dissatisfied Americans do not re-elect untested incompetent Chicago street thugs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> Forcasts I heard several days ago were for the offical number to approach 15% &#8211; so the actual number will be far higher than 20.</p>
<p>Friendly21 on July 2, 2009 at 7:06 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Obama will change the reporting criteria before that happens.  Americans, more than most cultures place importance in &#8220;what you do.&#8221;  He can&#8217;t afford to have nearly a quarter (using the unreported numbers) of Americans dissatisfied with their lot in life.  Dissatisfied Americans do not vote for the status quo which is what Obama is seeking to instititionalize.  Dissatisfied Americans do not re-elect untested incompetent Chicago street thugs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obamanomics: US Unemployment Rate Climbs to a 26 Year High at 9.5% &#124; Scared Monkeys</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/unemployment-creeps-up-to-95/comment-page-4/#comment-2380351</link>
		<dc:creator>Obamanomics: US Unemployment Rate Climbs to a 26 Year High at 9.5% &#124; Scared Monkeys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57933#comment-2380351</guid>
		<description>[...] Hot Air: Unemployment creeps up to 9.5% [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hot Air: Unemployment creeps up to 9.5% [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friendly21</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/unemployment-creeps-up-to-95/comment-page-4/#comment-2380199</link>
		<dc:creator>Friendly21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57933#comment-2380199</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;20% unemployment in general wouldnt be pretty. riots, crime, unrest…. itd be a back to the future II-like hell)
battleoflepanto1571 on July 2, 2009 at 2:21 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

We&#039;ll all wish it would only be 20%. Forcasts I heard several days ago were for the offical number to approach 15% - so the actual number will be far higher than 20.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>20% unemployment in general wouldnt be pretty. riots, crime, unrest…. itd be a back to the future II-like hell)<br />
battleoflepanto1571 on July 2, 2009 at 2:21 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>We&#8217;ll all wish it would only be 20%. Forcasts I heard several days ago were for the offical number to approach 15% &#8211; so the actual number will be far higher than 20.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friendly21</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/02/unemployment-creeps-up-to-95/comment-page-4/#comment-2380176</link>
		<dc:creator>Friendly21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57933#comment-2380176</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Another half a percent and we’re at depression levels.
If we aren’t already and that half a percent is being hidden somewhere.
rollthedice on July 2, 2009 at 10:24 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Today&#039;s numbers are counted differently then during the Depression era. In those days, only those who were working full time were counted as employed. The remained of the workforce were the unemployed.

After going through many revisions on how to count, today we count all non-working people by the number who are collecting some form of unemployment.

If you want to comppare the number announced today with the 30&#039;s, then the official number (as seen on Fox) is 17% v. 23.6%.

Just remember, every day someone&#039;s unemployment benefit runs out. When that occurrs, those people are no longer counted in the oficial number like today&#039;s 9.5%. This tactic and others help keep the number artificially low.

And is how politicains hide the true number of unemployed from the public.

After the Dems pass Cap N Tax, these numbers will skyrocket, and we&#039;ll wish we were living in the Great Depression when times where great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Another half a percent and we’re at depression levels.<br />
If we aren’t already and that half a percent is being hidden somewhere.<br />
rollthedice on July 2, 2009 at 10:24 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Today&#8217;s numbers are counted differently then during the Depression era. In those days, only those who were working full time were counted as employed. The remained of the workforce were the unemployed.</p>
<p>After going through many revisions on how to count, today we count all non-working people by the number who are collecting some form of unemployment.</p>
<p>If you want to comppare the number announced today with the 30&#8217;s, then the official number (as seen on Fox) is 17% v. 23.6%.</p>
<p>Just remember, every day someone&#8217;s unemployment benefit runs out. When that occurrs, those people are no longer counted in the oficial number like today&#8217;s 9.5%. This tactic and others help keep the number artificially low.</p>
<p>And is how politicains hide the true number of unemployed from the public.</p>
<p>After the Dems pass Cap N Tax, these numbers will skyrocket, and we&#8217;ll wish we were living in the Great Depression when times where great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
