Well, it’s not all bla bla bla.
As in this case: Most women are not, in my view, angry bitch psychotic academic victimized mini-monsters. The Retriever’s Grandma, for instance (image on right from that post).
Here at Maggie’s (Maggie is…

This is why Bush did not respond to the calls to rape his wife.

THAT is my opinion and it’s a sad day when simple criticism results in personal attacks. But I’ve noticed that is your MO.

It seems that in your zeal to make your point that you have cast all concern for reading comprehension to the wind.

csdeven on July 3, 2009 at 2:01 PM

If Bush had pushed back a little more, though, we might not have Obama right now.

She has the principles, drive, and strength which I consider is key to any successful leader.

As for 2012, I would happy with either Mitt or Sarah. Although both very different, both very capable.

And I do think I am taking off the week. You guys only seem to want to talk about sarah palin and furthermore you only want to hear the same thing — she’s running, this is a great move, she’s now perfectly poised for the race, etc.

I am really tired of this relentless nonsense and occasional nastiness whenever someone is believed to have departed from the conservativey correct line.

Remember how they trashed Reagan and GW Bush, for that matter, as simpletons? Sarah Palin does need to brush up on world affairs. However, her message does reach the people over the media’s objections.

Deeds, not words or in CrockObama’s own words: “just words, just speeches”. Hopefully, we continue to note Crockbama’s deeds and the destruction laid in his wake.

In fact it might be better to let Frum, Noonan, Parker, Sullivan and even Krauthammer cast our votes for us. Otherwise the government might get too big, bloated and corrupt; and the media stars might entwine themselves with power brokers who pull their strings behind the scenes.

Long live media analysts who are under no pressure to churn out one Objectively written and yet curiously sophistic “opinion” piece after another. It has worked magnificantly up to this point since we hinge on their every word as if they were somehow infallible.

This is why Bush did not respond to the calls to rape his wife.

THAT is my opinion and it’s a sad day when simple criticism results in personal attacks. But I’ve noticed that is your MO.

It seems that in your zeal to make your point that you have cast all concern for reading comprehension to the wind.

csdeven on July 3, 2009 at 2:01 PM

Here is how a guy like Reagan would have responded:

“Well, you know, some guys cannot seem to get around the fact they have no life. My wife, and I, on the other hand have a wonderful life. I am so sorry they don’t. But, one day I will get to meet them face-to-face, then we can discuss this like men. Heh Heh Heh”

Know one should ever be excused for talking about raping someone’s children or wife, no one! That is not free speech, it is pornographic verbal masturbation. There is a difference.

Typical. Once the monkey’s learn to use soap, they think they can speak for the world.

I don’t know.

BINGO! Give the monkey boy a Kewpie doll!

csdeven on July 3, 2009 at 1:44 PM

Look, friend, Jim Treacher certainly doesn’t need me to defend him, he can take you apart piece by piece, but he has given you a very good argument. Why don’t you do us all a favor and admit you have no reply, and leave the Junior High name-calling to the 13 year olds.

Thanks for everything, Sarah.

Jim Treacher on July 3, 2009 at 3:11 PM

I guess when he is right, he’s right. Last night was not my first encounter with him but it still played out the same. With the exception that you were more dogged in your response then most people are. He should try to remember that superiority is hard to pull off even if you have it.

bw222 on July 3, 2009 at 2:35 PM

There is a lot to that because I tend to blame Ivy League insiders for the debacle on Wall St. as well. The years of genuflecting to people who have been consider the intellects of our time are over. Most have them are probably alumni admissions rather than gaining entry by any scholarly pursuits of their own anyway. Hmmm, sounding a bit bitter.

Thanks, but my reading and typing skills are very low today and there were several unfortunate typos in that previous post which I did not catch. Can’t fix them at the moment. When in pain, I should not post. Nap time.

Loxodonta on July 3, 2009 at 3:00 PM

You enjoy that nap.

I enjoyed the thrashing DaveS was taking last night as he belittles in under the guise of being instructive. He brings out my bad qualities so I won’t respond to him the future. But I will truly enjoy the work of those who do.

Cindy Munford on July 3, 2009 at 1:57 PM

He’s not so bad. He just gets a silly idea in his head and won’t let it go, no matter the evidence to the contrary.

Upstater85 on July 3, 2009 at 2:13 PM

Thanks, but my reading and typing skills are very low today and there were several unfortunate typos in that previous post which I did not catch. Can’t fix them at the moment. When in pain, I should not post. Nap time.

I won’t respond to him the future.
Cindy Munford on July 3, 2009 at 1:57 PM

I don’t blame you.