Former Iranian president: Regime conducted “coup” against the people
posted at 8:46 am on July 2, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
If the Iranian mullahs expected the opposition movement to die out, in some cases literally, they got a big shock today from within their ruling class. Mohammed Khatami, a former president of Iran, has apparently switched sides and joined Mirhossein Mousavi in demanding new elections for Iran. Khatami went even further, accusing the Supreme Leader and Guardian Council of conducting a “coup”:
Iran’s former president has joined ranks with the country’s embattled reformist presidential candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi, and accused the Iranian government of failing its people in the recent election and condemning the subsequent crackdown on protesters.
In a bold, lengthy statement Wednesday on his Web site, Mousavi said he considered Iran’s cleric-led government illegitimate and demanded political prisoners be released, while saying Iran’s government needs to institute electoral reforms and ensure press freedoms.
Former President Mohammad Khatami, meanwhile, lashed out at what he termed “a poisonous security situation” in the wake of violent street protests.
Khatami accused Iran’s leadership of a “velvet coup against the people and democracy,” and Mousavi said the government’s crackdown on demonstrators was “tantamount to a coup.”
If the regime planned on drawing lines in the sand, they didn’t calculate on having some of their allies standing on the other side of it. Khatami had previously played the same role as Mousavi — the regime-approved reformer who could serve as a safe outlet for dissent and dissatisfaction within Iran. People outside of Iran fawned over Khatami in years past as they have over Mousavi in the past three weeks out of desire for significant political reform, but both Khatami and Mousavi belonged to the same power clique as Ali Khamenei and the Guardian Council.
Not any more. They may still have the taint of Khamenei’s previous approval, but now Khatami has apparently decided to follow Mousavi into a complete break with the ruling mullahs. That will energize the opposition and divide the mullahs even further. His previous status as Iranian president and Khamenei favorite gives him even more standing to call out Khamenei as a tyrant.
The opposition in Iran had already planned to move into a new phase, one that focused on efforts that would make it difficult for the Basij to quash, such as strikes. They risked losing political momentum by using quieter methods of protest. Khatami’s defection will give them renewed energy, and may have the mullahs in the ruling class drawing lines among themselves.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
My husband and I were talking last night. We were perplexed as to how the Honduran law-breaking tyrant overthrow was considered a coup and the rigged sham of Iran’s election wasn’t a coup.
Monica on July 2, 2009 at 8:50 AM
The Obama team landed completely on the wrong side of the Iranian situation, as they have done on the Honduran situation.
Expect a statement from Obama soon that begins, “As we’ve said all along…”
cruadin on July 2, 2009 at 8:52 AM
No no… Obama defines the very meaning of coup. Therefore he can’t be wrong.
Skywise on July 2, 2009 at 8:52 AM
Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness: INALIENABLE RIGHTS for ALL.
DL13 on July 2, 2009 at 8:53 AM
Khatami better stop meddling or Obooba will send in the ACORN.
Akzed on July 2, 2009 at 8:54 AM
I don’t get it.. what’s his motivation?
Phoenician on July 2, 2009 at 8:55 AM
This is good news and I hope it expands. The more “insiders” break away the better the chance that dissent will grow. Very brave people to faced the powers unarmed.
Cindy Munford on July 2, 2009 at 9:00 AM
He never got the cookies he was promised for joining the Dark Side.
pifactorial on July 2, 2009 at 9:00 AM
Obama’s motivation?
Option 1- Iran terrifies him, Honduras not so much.
2- He’s less sympathetic to freedom and self-determination than to tyrannical control.
3- all of the above
Monica on July 2, 2009 at 9:01 AM
My BS detector is ringing off the hook. Smoke and mirrors. They are buying time for the nuke. Keep your eyes on the nuke. Who controls its development? Who benefits once they declare? Who vacillates and dithers while they push along behind the cover of political instability?
elduende on July 2, 2009 at 9:01 AM
Either he senses some weakness among the reigning mullahs, or else he has a death wish (wants to become a martyr?).
AZCoyote on July 2, 2009 at 9:02 AM
Sorry Phoenician, I was reading comments and assumed you meant Obama, not Khatami. My bad.
Monica on July 2, 2009 at 9:03 AM
Good point. How many hear of stories about the messes in Iran or Honduras and think to themselves, what backward people for allowing this type of election to happen.Yet here we have ACORN,the unions and others causing outright voter fraud in our own elections.
Jeff from WI on July 2, 2009 at 9:05 AM
I don’t understand how a clerical regime can also be a democracy. I don’t understand how an Islamic cleric can argue for individual rights. Neither of these stances is “Islamic.” Seriously, is this guy nuts? If he believes what he says, what’s the basis for having a theocracy in the first place? Something’s not adding up for me here. Traditional Shi’ism eschews politics anyway I thought. I think what doesn’t make sense, what’s contradictory, is trying to reconcile Islam with modern values. Muslims are screwy.
JiangxiDad on July 2, 2009 at 9:05 AM
Good point. Maybe they have read Alinsky.
Cindy Munford on July 2, 2009 at 9:06 AM
And the plot thickens…
ernesto on July 2, 2009 at 9:07 AM
This is muslim logic.
JiangxiDad on July 2, 2009 at 9:07 AM
Why does Obama seem to side on the wrong side in both situations? He’s thinking like a Kenyan instead of an American president. Its really that simple.
volsense on July 2, 2009 at 9:07 AM
Actually Alinsky must have learned and read from the real masters of political strategy and the inventors of Chess…the Persians.
elduende on July 2, 2009 at 9:09 AM
Hang together [Iranian rsistence] or you shall hang separately. I hope the resistence can topple the regime so we can avoid a war…a major war.
WashJeff on July 2, 2009 at 9:21 AM
Promising.
the_nile on July 2, 2009 at 9:23 AM
It took Communists working from within to bring down the Soviet regime. Here’s hoping the same dynamic works again. Too bad Benito Obama has other priorities.
RobertE on July 2, 2009 at 9:24 AM
More specifically, he’s thinking like Kenyan dictator Daniel arap Moi, who came to power and immediately installed his cronies to key positions and repressed opposition movements. Is this all that much different from a Chicago street thug coming into power and creating a shadow government of unelected and unconfirmed “czars” to run things while stamping out the very foundations of the Constitution.. A year ago I would have thought such a comparison ridiculous. Now? Not so much.
highhopes on July 2, 2009 at 9:32 AM
Chavez and Castro claim a coup took place in Honduras and Obama breathlessly agrees. The former Iranian president claims a coup took place in Iran, and Obama still endorses the mullahs. It looks like Obama’s foreign policy is to prop up dictators who hate America.
pearson on July 2, 2009 at 9:32 AM
Who knows? Maybe Khatami figured that the mullah muckamucks would eventually move against him so this is his best defense.
RandyChandler on July 2, 2009 at 9:33 AM
In the month of June how much money did the Barry administration forward to Hamas, and how much was did they forward to the Iranian dissidents?
Limerick on July 2, 2009 at 9:33 AM
This is what Hope and Change means.
No thanks to the DipStickInChief
bluelightbrigade on July 2, 2009 at 9:39 AM
Seems logical.
OldEnglish on July 2, 2009 at 9:43 AM
There are going to be a lot of well known people in Iran hanging by ropes in the near future.
Obama’s position only makes sense if he already had an agreement in place prior to the election with Dinnerjacket and the mullahs. Nothing else makes sense.
His position on Honduras is the Rev Wright’s. Twenty years in a pew listening to that ahole will have you sleeping with Castro, Chavez and Ortega–the common theme, they are all racists. All current problems are caused by white people–the blue eyed devils. America has to be brought low. This is why Obama travels the world repenting for America’s sins.
patrick neid on July 2, 2009 at 9:47 AM
I blame Bush.
Itchee Dryback on July 2, 2009 at 9:54 AM
Good point.
Itchee Dryback on July 2, 2009 at 9:56 AM
LOL..we all do..thanks to him we have Obama
Jeff from WI on July 2, 2009 at 9:59 AM
It’s quite simple:
1) getting rid of a Leftist dictator-wannabe is wrong, no matter how lawful the process
2) vote rigging is not wrong to any Democrat coming out of Chicago.
rbj on July 2, 2009 at 10:00 AM
Remember. He was born in Hawaii.
Ampleforth on July 2, 2009 at 10:02 AM
This is the key stage, to wit, whether the opposition can move from mass demonstrations to organized efforts to keep the movement alive until the “fire the next time.”
Betcha’ dollars to t-bills, our intelligence agencies know squat as to what is going on re this matter.
SteveMG on July 2, 2009 at 10:06 AM
In Chicago it’s not called vote rigging, it’s called “Starting Camelot 1960″
Jeff from WI on July 2, 2009 at 10:08 AM
Ah, good! The real Jeff’s back. :)
OldEnglish on July 2, 2009 at 10:12 AM
Same damn thing going on here fellow.
bluegrass on July 2, 2009 at 10:19 AM
Good question. I’ll go further:
How much time, money and effort has Obama devoted to any democratic country or movement ever? How much time, money, appeasement, apology, and complimenting has Obama devoted to repressive and anti-American regimes, whether leftist or Islamic?
Loxodonta on July 2, 2009 at 10:24 AM
LOL..Guess what, I evidently just offended someone AGAIN on a Helen Thomas joke. Now I’m an “ageist”
Jeff from WI on July 2, 2009 at 10:26 AM
Khatami vs Ahmadi is more like Al Zawahiri vs Sadr or Stalin vs Trotski.
We like the FACT they are fighting, but we won’t like the outcome no matter who wins.
Aristotle on July 2, 2009 at 10:32 AM
Barack Obama: Obviously Khatami doesn’t understand the difference between a coup and a robust debate.
Basilsbest on July 2, 2009 at 10:35 AM
Huh? Iran is still wrestling with who’s in charge? Don’t they know that their week in the world spotlight is over?
The Iranian opposition’s PR firm must be out to lunch. Maybe they can go to dinner with WaPo and get some face time with the White House. Now wouldn’t THAT be embarassing– an Obama administration official seen hanging out with someone who supports free and fair elections?
hawksruleva on July 2, 2009 at 10:38 AM
How much time, money, and regulation have they devoted to repressive and anti-American regimes here at home?
What’s the czar count up to? Has the EPA surpassed Congress in it’s authority over commerece? What’s Obama calling the new coupes from GM next year? Of course he supports illegitimate governments.
hawksruleva on July 2, 2009 at 10:41 AM
Who’s WE? Do you have a mouse in your pocket?
Sure seems that way doesn’t it Ed? It’s a difficult thing to understand the shifting sand in Iran. I gotta wonder if Sistani is a player in this lastest defection against Khamanei. He may be the counsel for Khatami and sees an opportunity here that should not be missed.
I still think that the campaign platform of Mousavi is an indicator of the direction that those in the streets risking their lives for fairness and representative government want Iran to go. It’s obvious that one of those issues was more freedom for women.
As far as nuclear weapons are concerned, you know Iranians have been told the same BS story that we’ve been told .. that Iran’s nuclear pursuits are for power generation and not weapons. Seems to me that the best opportunity to stop Iran from weapon development is being missed by the Obama administration because he doesn’t understand the potential of this unrest. I hope some reporter has the guts to ask Obama about Khatami’s defection.
Texas Gal on July 2, 2009 at 11:00 AM
Now that a dictator has called it a “coup” will President Obama be against it?
29Victor on July 2, 2009 at 11:03 AM
Exactly! And add to that that the American people are allowing their “representatives” to vote willy nilly for what THEY want instead of voting as the people they represent want? How about money running DC instead of the people?
katablog.com on July 2, 2009 at 11:06 AM
Exactly, 29Victor.
He wanted to get in on the ground floor with O-Bots. If it’s a “coup” then Washington will quickly and soundly denounce it.
Jaibones on July 2, 2009 at 11:07 AM
Not surprising, you always have written like a dude that hates old people…
I’m glad there is still a glimmer of life in the Iranian dissident movement.
myrenovations on July 2, 2009 at 11:37 AM
I wonder why he did this if he is part of the inner circle. There must be a compelling reason someone would defect under threat of death. Lets hope it is because he has inside information that this could actually be the revolution that changes things for the better.
Miss Molly on July 2, 2009 at 11:49 AM
Velvet dipped in blood.
nukemhill on July 2, 2009 at 12:26 PM
Now I’m an “ageist”
I am old people
Jeff from WI on July 2, 2009 at 12:45 PM
That’s right! And the Basij are really “community activists”!
Socratease on July 2, 2009 at 2:03 PM