Comments on: WH: Sotomayor reversal proves what a great judge she is

By: Supreme Court Overturns Ricci Case « Verus Politics: Truth and Reason

Supreme Court Overturns Ricci Case « Verus Politics: Truth and Reason — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:52:37 +0000

[...] Lyle Denniston’s analysis of the decision at SCOTUSblog is here, and George Will’s commentary is here. Both are worth reading. The White House is trying to say that the ruling shows that Sotomayor is an originalist, while Stuart Taylor explains that all the judges rejected Sotomayor’s position on the case (H/T Ed Morrissey). [...]

By: Sotomayor Decision Overturned Because She’s An Awesome Judge « Beltway Snark

Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:40:25 +0000

[...] Decision Overturned Because She’s An Awesome Judge Jump to Comments That’s the WH spin and they’re sticking to it. The White House came to the defense of President Obama’s pick [...]

By: Supreme Court Overturns Sotomayor Judgment — Where’s a Wise Latina Woman on the Court When You Need One? « Quick Daily Hits — Politics and Such

Wed, 01 Jul 2009 05:03:31 +0000

[...] Breitbart: Court rules for white firefighters over promotions Powerline: What Will She Do For an Encore? What Will She Do For an Encore, Part 2 Did the Supreme Court Pull the Trigger? Michelle Malkin: Questions for Sonia Sotomayor Racism rejected: SCOTUS reverses Sotomayor in firefighters case Red State: The NRA is MIA on Sonia Sotomayor Obama’s Racist Judge Hot Air: WH: Sotomayor reversal proves what a great judge she is [...]

By: mr.blacksheep

mr.blacksheep — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:24:43 +0000

Speaking of my belle. I have a pic of her looking at Carla Bruni
lilium on June 30, 2009 at 6:11 PM

She probably thought she was looking at breakfast.

By: lilium

lilium — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:11:32 +0000

Speaking of my belle. I have a pic of her looking at Carla Bruni that agrees with what you say. Pure anger/jealous look. It was on Drudge but I don’t know how to get it on this post.

By: rjoco1

rjoco1 — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:46:23 +0000

you think obama is a racist–how about his wife. i went to school with people just like her and she is an angry woman

By: lilium

lilium — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:25:57 +0000

I don’t know about anyone else, but I have no doubt that Obama is also a racist.

By: Monkei

Monkei — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:59:31 +0000

She definitely is not the “activist” judge people claim she is …

By: Geronimo

Geronimo — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:41:35 +0000

Obama is really successful at confusing every single issue with misinformation. You would think he was at war with the American people.

petunia on June 30, 2009 at 11:45 AM

He is. The funny thing is that the libs are cheering him on, which shows how much their brains have deteriorated.

By: rocketman

rocketman — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:16:41 +0000

***
Gibbs must be SMOKING UP (the funky Cheech and Chong sized hand-rolled joints) just before he goes on camera. This is the only rational explanation for the transparent lies he keeps telling.
***
The Left Wing Media (not MSM) just keeps nodding their heads and ignoring the C**P. Kindof like watching and listening to “Bagdad Bob” at a Saddam Hussein attended presser as the whine of stealth fighters, the whistle of falling bombs, and the flashes and blasts punctuated the news conferences just before the U.S. Military took down the regime.
***
Unbelievable! Get Gibbs Bagdad Bob’s beret–it will fit perfectly.
***
John Bibb
***

By: pilamaye

pilamaye — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:02:16 +0000

Did Robert Gibbs need medical attention after the briefing to see if he may have possibly incurred any brain damage. After all, if you are an Obamaist addicted to “Hopium”, it takes a lot of mind power and exertion to come up with a phrase like “judicial originalist” without doing some serious injury to yourself.

By: TechieNotTrekkie

TechieNotTrekkie — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:56:34 +0000

Gibbs is a tool. I am reminded of Baghdad Bob every time he speaks. Baghdad Bob

By: redfoxbluestate

redfoxbluestate — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:55:52 +0000

Once again, the Barry White House finds one of the least impressive candidates for a post of critical importance:

- tax-dodger for the Fed
- someone who didn’t file taxes for Dept of State protocol
- a complete nincompoop for head of DHS who doesn’t want to uphold immigration law
- a liberal, pro-abortion Catholic for Vatican ambassador
- a transportation secretary that wishes people would just stop driving their cars, already!
- a heavily pro-union labor secretary
- a SCOTUS candidate for whom the Constitution is a mere inconvenience

Lost track of the numerous other offensive, ridiculous, incompetent, hypocritical appointments – some confirmed, others not.

By: capejasmine

capejasmine — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:51:41 +0000

Last night, I saw a clip on tv of Jamie Foxx on the BET awards. He said Michael was theirs. I assume being black, he belonged to the Black community, and that they were only letting us borrow him. As if they owned him. I found that comment kind of offensive, and telling.

How will we ever overcome racism, and predjudice, with this kind of thinking? Why don’t we see ourselves, all of us as, Americans? The divisiveness is sad. I really felt sadness listening to that comment.

Sotomayor is no different. She views the world in parts. Black, white, Hispanic, etc… and each has their own laws to abide by. Again I ask… why are whites to be excluded from having civil rights? All laws should apply to all people in this nation. Every fireman involved in this, had the same test, the same amount of time to study, the same opportunity. It boils down to one thing. We know who worked hard, and studied for this test, and we know who didn’t. So bottom line is….they dissed the guys who passed, to make it racially fair. If that’s not judicial activism, I don’t know what is.

By: marklmail

marklmail — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:37:51 +0000

This buffoon can’t cover for the landslide of truths that are going to bury the lies they’ve been telling. They need four whipping boys for all of the coming bullsh*t they have to answer for.

By: Mcguyver

Mcguyver — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:37:45 +0000

That’s impressively Orwellian.

Yes, and?

Oooooh, but the speech in Cairo was pretty good!

By: PaddyJ

PaddyJ — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:36:37 +0000

The clock runs out.
The quarterback scrambles and scores – 5 seconds after the game is over.
Head referee Giblet declares that the touchdown will count.
His explanation:
“I’m a referee originalist.”

By: MirCat

MirCat — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:27:40 +0000

He’s like the salesman you ask a question about a product that you were defiantly going to buy only for him to answer you and convince you to not buy it.

- The Cat

By: Jeff from WI

Jeff from WI — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:14:51 +0000

Gibbs is as ethical and honorable as David Letterman or Michael Jackson

By: Seven Percent Solution

Seven Percent Solution — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:14:22 +0000

Sotofinger……..

By: Loxodonta

Loxodonta — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:13:43 +0000

This is the same reasoning I’ve read from leftist scientists to deal with evidence that doesn’t fit into Global Warming theory. Global cooling is evidence of Global Warming. Indeed, everything is evidence of Global Warming. So, I expect that if Sonia Sotomayor was arrested for some criminal offense, that too would be evidence to the Obamanation of her great qualifications for the Supreme Court.

By: bluegrass

bluegrass — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:13:39 +0000

It isn’t so just because boy king and his jasper say so. Where’s the proof wiseguys.

By: James

James — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:07:32 +0000

Isn’t that the definition of “judicial activism”?

We have always been at war with judicial activism.

By: NoFanofLibs

NoFanofLibs — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:07:18 +0000

Up is down, wet is dry…..Ok I get it now

By: bloviator

bloviator — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:02:37 +0000

Running into the street traffic ‘cuz the boss told you to do so doesn’t take chutzpah, just stupidity.