Awful: Sanford’s wife learned of affair by discovering letter from mistress; Update: I won’t resign, says Sanford
posted at 4:40 pm on June 26, 2009 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | regular view
He seemed so raw and tormented at Wednesday’s presser and so authentic about the grief he felt that I simply assumed he’d gone to his wife after he first realized he was in love and tearfully confessed the whole thing. Nope. File this away with the lies he told his staff about where he was going and the fact that he was prepared to spend fully 10 days incommunicado in Buenos Aires had the media not started making noise about his absence. Oh, and did I mention that Mrs. S now claims she told him to end the affair — before he upped and left for Argentina?
If 50 percent said he should quit yesterday, figure it’ll be upwards of 65 once this report, replete with details about a weeping Jenny, starts making the rounds.
South Carolina first lady Jenny Sanford says she discovered her husband’s affair in January when she found a letter to the governor from his mistress.
Jenny Sanford told The Associated Press on Friday she told him to end the affair and was shocked this week when she found out he’d gone to Argentina to see his mistress. She says she believed Gov. Mark Sanford had gone somewhere to work on writing a book…
She wept as she displayed her boys’ stellar report cards and said she most worries about how they’re being affected by the scandal. Jenny Sanford says she plans to take them out of the state for the weekend.
Byron York has six hard questions for Sanford, including whether his supposedly tortured soul ever planned to come clean had he not been caught at the airport by a reporter. Let me add a seventh: Whom does Sanford suspect of leaking the e-mails to his mistress? The State newspaper claimed they got copies of the messages from an anonymous tipster in December; Jenny Sanford now claims she stumbled upon some sort of letter from Maria in January. Hmmm. If she’s not the tipster herself, did the tipster also forward Maria’s letters to her?
Here’s the clip of his cabinet meeting this morning; the first four minutes are more than enough. Evidently he’s been thinking hard about King David and Psalms. Shouldn’t he have been thinking about the Ten Commandments, say, a year ago? Click the image to watch.
Update: Come on, Mark. Hit the road.
“I remain committed to rebuilding the trust that has been committed to me over the next 18 months, and it is my hope that I am able to follow the example set by David in the Bible – who after his fall from grace humbly refocused on the work at hand,” Sanford said in a statement following a meeting with his Cabinet. “By doing so, I will ultimately better serve in every area of my life, and I am committed to doing so.”
Asked by POLITICO if the statement indicated that Sanford would not resign, his spokesman, Joel Sawyer, emailed: “Correct.”
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
Wow……
There are a lot of people in this world who would be overjoyed with one over-achieving son, let alone four…
Pretty, educated wife
Four strapping boys
Governor of South Carolina
Rising GOP star
Father’s Day Weekend
NOT GOOD ENOUGH!
What a creepshow this guy is.
Cornhusker on June 26, 2009 at 6:13 PM
Has he explained WHY he didn’t even take his cell phone? Who was the staff member that finally told him to stop acting like a 9 year old who ran away from home?
Speedwagon82 on June 26, 2009 at 6:16 PM
D
No, he didn’t break a law. He broke trust. Through breaching his marriage vows, deceiving his family, ditching (or deceiving) his security detail, going incommunicado for a full week, Sanford cannot now be trusted to make either rational judgements or keep his word.
It’s all about relationships. Governors are essentially CEOs, high-end managers. Everything they do revolves around their relationships with their staff, the legislature, and other office holders. Without trust he has very little political capital.
A governor with strong relationships can accomplish much even as a “lame duck”. In Sanford’s case, he knee-capped himself with the affair. He and the South Carolina will essentially be in a holding pattern until the next election.
Finally, there may have been a legal violation. How did the newspaper get the emails? Its been suggested that the Lt Gov. has reasons to undermine Sanford. If so, how did the Lt Gov get personal emails unless Sanford was using a STATE computer to correspond with his mistress? Also, there’s been suggestion that postal communications between the two were made from the Governor’s office. They could have a misappropriation case to work with….
Ace ODale on June 26, 2009 at 6:19 PM
Resign Governor. You need to get your personal life in order, and then your professional life.
sDs61678 on June 26, 2009 at 6:20 PM
Honestly, I don’t think he should resign either. He didn’t do anything illegal. If he can continue to do his duties effectively, I see no reason for him to leave.
Granted, he is no longer in good standing. It seems proper for him to resign whatever other GOP boards he was on.
AbaddonsReign on June 26, 2009 at 6:20 PM
If you are King David why don’t you take your Bathseeba and ride into the sunset.
technopeasant on June 26, 2009 at 6:25 PM
Problem is … he was AWOL for four days and intent on staying away for ten until he got caught. He’s the Chief Executive of the State of South Carolina – the people vote in executives who will be at the helm of the ship. Not only did he step away from the helm – but he did so without proper relief – he didn’t tell the Lt. Governor he was going to be in charge if the ship headed for the rocks.
I put this in Navy terms because I was in the Navy – and in the Navy – a man who steps away from his watchstation without relief is disqualified from that watchstation and usually punished.
If Sanford has any dignity – he will resign. He is not going to be effective in that position. The people want him to go.
He should take the hint.
HondaV65 on June 26, 2009 at 6:29 PM
Many women think of the other woman as a backstabbing home wrecker…that’s why they don’t like ‘em so much.
Is the word “whore” more acceptable to you?
marybel on June 26, 2009 at 6:34 PM
Fair enough. You’re right, the AWOL was pretty egregious. I just remember liking the way he stood up to Obama on the stimulus.
AbaddonsReign on June 26, 2009 at 6:37 PM
+ 100
The best part of the Vitter scandal was the folk ballad. It makes some salient points for Sanford, as well. Dereliction of duty and breaking trust.
Vitter, however, did not go on a manic spree to another country and have state troopers looking for him. That is the cuckoo part of the story. Taxpayer dollars and that wondering whether he’s dead or alive part. He’s toast.
Not to mention, he now has a lot of enemies. His wife is loaded, came from a good, well-connected family, and she made his career. Sanford is a scumbag.
alliebobbitt on June 26, 2009 at 6:38 PM
The only way I see him getting out of this mess is to switch parties. The Dem’s will circle the wagons around him, the MSM will become suddenly silent. He can then move to Arkansas, marry a dykie looking woman, and run for President.
M-14 2go on June 26, 2009 at 6:39 PM
Regarding Vitter, people were pretty upset that he had some whore changing his diapers five times while Congress was in session. I can’t believe he still has his job, but that was Marion Berry juicy and fairly innocuous.
“Wearing diapers ain’t a sin, except for full-grown men.”
alliebobbitt on June 26, 2009 at 6:41 PM
Listen to York and Krauthammer!
alliebobbitt on June 26, 2009 at 6:44 PM
He should start governing his state, deal with his personal life prviately, remain accountable for his whereabouts at all times, and move on. He should not resign.
exceller on June 26, 2009 at 6:45 PM
This wife is cracking me up more and more. She’s just leaking the facts one by one. :)
I bet he prefers someone who is a bit less challenging. *haha
AnninCA on June 26, 2009 at 6:55 PM
If a regular person failed to show up for work for 3 or 4 days, did not call in and was not on vacation, he’d be terminated for job abandonment.
Sanford works for the people of SC. They should decide whether he stays or goes. Tawdry affair and publicly humilating and disgracing his family aside, anyone who thinks he can blithely trot off to another country for ten days, and thinks no one will notice, is too damned stupid to work at a Jack-in-the-Box.
NTXLass on June 26, 2009 at 7:00 PM
That sounds many orders of magnitude beyond “don’t like ‘em so much.” It sounds personal, like someone is reliving their own circumstance. I think that Sigmund above had it about right with his “Rorschach test” comment.
MB4 on June 26, 2009 at 7:09 PM
Not many women, a few women maybe who can’t see that blaming the woman is excusing the man.
The word “whore” should never be used lightly.
lili on June 26, 2009 at 7:22 PM
Sanford’s next job …I think he should take it.
Laura in Maryland on June 26, 2009 at 7:23 PM
I accept infidelity. It’s just a fact of life, but I’m not into placing blame. It’s the consequences of actions on the part of the people participating.
The mistress definitely has no respect for marriage. Well, that’s indicative of someone then who has no respect for long-term commitments. So why would the adulterer really think he’s landed in heaven, other than deep-down, he knows, this isn’t a “keeper.”
Heck, I even enjoyed those more relaxed *ahem* arrangments in my youth. No big responsibilities. That can make anyone look better in my eyes.
The adulter obviously is the weak character in the play. Rather than just make a decision to be in or out, he tries to have it both ways and avoid decisions. I can testify that being with someone who avoids hard choices is really a bitch. That means….others get to carry the freight.
He’s no prize, in short.
What’s fun about this story? Me? I was a wreck when my marriage ended. This wife is a hero, as far as I’m concerned. She’s what I wanted to be! No, me….I cry and worry that “he’ll” be OK while he’s moving in with the girlfriend and embarassing the heck out of me.
She was Latina, too. Funny coincidence. :)
Anyway, the entire story is amusing fodder, so long as you’re not really involved.
AnninCA on June 26, 2009 at 7:31 PM
The mistress doesn’t respect marriage or long-term commitment. That’s clear. He doesn’t have the backbone to make a real decision about his marriage. That’s clear.
They deserve one another.
What’s the best revenge for the wife? Watching these bozos try to work that baggage out.
AnninCA on June 26, 2009 at 7:36 PM
The Redemption Office? Is that where I go to cash in my stimulus check?
Limerick on June 26, 2009 at 7:51 PM
It’s obvious that Sanford has imploded. There shouldn’t really even be a question of whether or not he resigns… he definitely should.
Even if one ignores the adultery, which btw, is breaking the law in SC…. (Yep, it’s still on the books)… his judgment is clearly IMPAIRED. Governors don’t just walk off the job for ten days without making the appropriate arrangements. And no man who’s thinking straight is going to spend Father’s Day shacked up with some slimy ho-bag rather than spend the day with his young children.
If he can get a battery of psychiatrists to attest to his fitness for the job, then fine. But I doubt he’d pass mental muster in his current state.
All I can say is that if he was bound to fall down and go ‘boom’, I’m glad he did it now rather than a couple of years from now. He’s toast.
Murf76 on June 26, 2009 at 8:10 PM
Throw the bum out. Move to Argentina you scum bag.
Jeff from WI on June 26, 2009 at 8:17 PM
Using the word “whore” to describe a woman who deliberately desecrates a marriage and family isn’t exactly using the word “lightly”. It’s not like Miss Thing didn’t know she was doing a married guy.
Murf76 on June 26, 2009 at 8:18 PM
I disagree, this is not part of my life and yet I find Sanford’s behavior self centered and despicable and Marie’s in that same category. I do not have to be personally involved to detest that behavior and the people who choose to inflict its consequences on four young boys. Maria will probably sell pics of her “banging body” and her evenings with Sanford to the tabloids.
clnurnberg on June 26, 2009 at 8:22 PM
Let’s see – unfaithful to his wife, irresponsible to his constituency, and STUPID! Is there anyone anywhere who doesn’t know by now that you don’t put private stuff in emails????
MochaLite on June 26, 2009 at 8:23 PM
Governor Sanford should seriously think about resigning and allowing a transition period like former Governor Jim McGreevey of New Jersey did.
Sanfords misdeeds go way beyond adultery. People are willing to forgive an affair but Sanford may even have broken some laws here if he used taxpayer funds for his trysts. He has lied to his staffers, his colleagues and his constituents.
There are just too many questions about his lack of judgement, ethics, fiduciary duty and professionalism in addition to the harm he has done to his family.
sarahpalinfan99 on June 26, 2009 at 8:37 PM
Oh please, Sanford is throwing a hail mary.
People skewered Palin for letting her kids fly on trips for legitimate political purposes.
Anyone really think the public, in this economic situation, is going to let some flipping millionaire charge the state for a 10 day tryste with some Latina bimbo?
Please.
Let’s get real.
AnninCA on June 26, 2009 at 8:40 PM
I never knew who he was. I didn’t care who he was. I now read this story, and realize that my “missing this story” was probably on target.
This guy just is another “beta male” tale in life.
Avoid making a decision. Find an easier path.
Ah, she’ll do!
AnninCA on June 26, 2009 at 9:24 PM
Sanford did multiple stupid things, but he isn’t exactly getting away scot-free. He’s lost even the slim chance he had at a POTUS run, resigned as chair of the RGA, and is hanging on to his job by a thread.
IMO, he should fight to stay if he wants to (in a country that allows Blago to fight as long as he did, Clinton to stay in office, Vitter and Ensign to stick around, etc. why not?) It’ll be an uphill battle to regain credibility and trust in the office, and it would be easier to take if he managed to rebuild his family, but adultery is not typically a firing offense in American politics.
cs89 on June 26, 2009 at 10:15 PM
For the good of the party,Sanford needs to resign,yesterday!!
canopfor on June 26, 2009 at 11:04 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ST8z3cuHi5g
slp on June 26, 2009 at 11:18 PM
AnninCA figured out why beta males make lousy executives. Credit where it’s due.
alliebobbitt on June 26, 2009 at 11:27 PM
Yeah, you’re right. I don’t like hos so much.
However, I do know reformed hos, who I am proud to call my friends.
I don’t like the word “mistress” for the same reason I don’t like the word “affair”. I prefer the words ho and adultery b/c they don’t have the “romantic” edge that the first two words do.
There is nothing romantic about adultery.
Marsh on June 26, 2009 at 11:41 PM
I disagree, this is not part of my life and yet I find Sanford’s behavior self centered and despicable and Marie’s in that same category. I do not have to be personally involved to detest that behavior and the people who choose to inflict its consequences on four young boys. Maria will probably sell pics of her “banging body” and her evenings with Sanford to the tabloids.
clnurnberg on June 26, 2009 at 8:22 PM
Indeed.
Morally sound people do not have to experience murder in order to know it is wrong.
Marsh on June 26, 2009 at 11:44 PM
Using the word “whore” to describe a woman who deliberately desecrates a marriage and family isn’t exactly using the word “lightly”. It’s not like Miss Thing didn’t know she was doing a married guy.
Murf76 on June 26, 2009 at 8:18 PM
Isn’t it revealing how some people will get bent over a word that accurately describes what a person has become, but not so much over the act itself?
When a mirror is held up, those who don’t like what they see cry foul.
Happens every time.
Marsh on June 26, 2009 at 11:54 PM
I am glad there are so many righteous persons that grace this blog. Many factors can go into cheating that we know nothing about in their situation. And for those who think sex is not important in a marriage, well I would say the reason I don’t marry my friends is cause I don’t intend on having sex with them unlike the reason I married my wife. Mabe someone can explain to me the value of a marriage were one spouse has chosen to be celibate; thereby, forcing the other spouse to be celibate? In my opinion no less harm is done to a marriage by a spouse that with holds than a spouse that cheats.
mbrans on June 27, 2009 at 12:11 AM
I’m going to repost what I said about this subject on another thread…
I think it is terribly cruel for a wife to w/hold sex from her husband. I often wonder how she would feel if her husband only talked to her once a week. Or once every other week. I dare say most women would not tolerate it from their husbands. And yet, they will w/hold sex from their husbands for long spans of time w/o blinking an eye.
What if your wife is w/holding sex from you AND she cheats?
It happens. All too often.
This culture poo poos men’s needs. Women not only refuse to meet their husband’s most important emotional need, but they will often SHAME him for having it! “Oh, THAT’S ALL YOU’RE interested in?” “Your such a pervert!
OUTRAGEOUS!
I wonder what those wives would say if their husbands quit their jobs and simply said, “I don’t FEEL like working today…or tomorrow….or the next week…”
And when she complained about needing money, what if he said, “Is THAT all you want me for? A pay check?”
Whatever problems a couple has, they ought to try to resolve them INSIDE their marriage, not outside of it.
If they can’t be resolved then D.
Marsh on June 27, 2009 at 12:31 AM
Marsh on June 27, 2009 at 12:31 AM
A thoughtful and accurate response. I agree.
Having a firm belief in the bible and being a person who belives strongly regarding laws and rules I don’t view divorce lightly. I would just say that in a marriage each partner should strive to fulfill the needs of the other, and if it is brought to light that those needs aren’t being fulfilled and one partner continues to not meet those needs then they can’t be too surprised when the other finds someone who will. I don’t think that makes the one that cheats evil or right, they are just people. I don’t feel it diqualifies them from their job. I can tell you that I have never cheated on my spouse or even past girlfriends, but I hate to say there have been times when it might not have taken much pushing, and so mabe I just have a bit more understanding why some would cross the line.
mbrans on June 27, 2009 at 1:11 AM
Absolutely.
If this is the sitch you find yourself in, pick up His Needs, Her Needs You don’t even have to read it, but leave it around your house. Your wife will. And it may help her to understand how important sexual fullfillment is to you.
It’s not surprised how many men have expressed similar thoughts about this on HA. I hope all the wives on here are listening up.
Marsh on June 27, 2009 at 1:28 AM
It may surprise you to know that many people who commit adultery say they were happily married.
Sanford placed the blame for the affair squarely on his shoulders.
Many people have poor boundaries. Seems that was true in Sanford’s case. Which is why I think they may recover their marriage.
Marsh on June 27, 2009 at 1:41 AM
Wow, Sanford just keeps going done a few notches everyday in my book— the husband that is.
Upstater85 on June 27, 2009 at 2:39 AM
Sanford is now the new poster boy in the left’s campaign against conservatives. He’s a hypocrite in the left’s eyes (in mine too, I must confess.) He believes in God, goes to church, speaks family values and then he totally bungs it up. No one is perfect, but if you are going to extol the praises of these things and claim virtuosness, then please live by those things you claim.
It’s not the affair itself that’s troublesome, though. It’s that someone, if he hadn’t been caught, could have used the affair as blackmail leverage against him–and still can. Someone posted earlier about pics possibly appearing in the tabloids. I wonder if the “chica” in Argentina is going to ask for money or political favors to keep said pics out of sight? And then there is the secrecy factor and the apparent total disregard for his responsibilities to those who elected him to office and those with whom he daily works. Were I one of his electorate, I would be pushing for a recall election or something. A man who sneaks, deceives, and lies his way OUT OF THE COUNTRY for a roll in the hay is NOT to be trusted with state secrets.
How about next time we hear someone speak on family values and such, let’s ask them to define what they are talking about–in depth! Just so we know whether or not we’re on the same page.
Driefromseattle on June 27, 2009 at 4:09 AM
Precisely. He’s untrustworthy. If he was unhappy in his marriage, so be it, none of my business, he should have done the grown up thing and separated formally not made up a lie about hiking and soul-searching before jaunting off to Argentina for sex. If he is an honest man with nothing to hide, why be so damn sneaky.
Even if he was going to be an adulterer, why be a childish crybaby about it when you get caught?
I do understand old Maria’s rationale, at 43 the likelihood is that this was her last chance to go for the headlines or snag a husband of note. Needless to say she was out for herself. I wonder, being a former journalist and all, if she did not press for the friendship to turn into more in order to disgrace Sanford and help “the one”? Anybody know anything about her politics?
clnurnberg on June 27, 2009 at 7:26 AM
The worthless scum should just eat a .38
Jeff from WI on June 27, 2009 at 7:35 AM
Ahh..that’s not very nice of me. Forget the .38, just retire, FOREVER from public life, or join the other side where they’ll accept ANY deviant behavior.
Jeff from WI on June 27, 2009 at 8:23 AM
You don’t know this woman. You’ve never met her. You’re assuming things you can’t know, and when you toss words on assumption, in anger at a woman you don’t even know and never will, that’s tossing lightly, tossing without thought.
“Whore”, like “pimp”, has taken on different meanings, been used incorrectly and accepted, but for some of us, it’s not a word to toss without thought.
lili on June 27, 2009 at 8:59 AM
lili on June 27, 2009
Because we “don’t know this woman” we can’t judge her actions? Sorry, but most of us weren’t raised to be so morally neutral. I agree that “whore” is not appropriate unless she was taking cash or drugs for sex. How about “loose”, “homewrecking tramp” or “slut”?
SKYFOX on June 27, 2009 at 9:30 AM
LOL
You assume many things about posters here, while telling them not to assume things about Sanford’s whore.
Marsh on June 27, 2009 at 9:48 AM
And the idea that he asked permission “Jenny can I go to Argentina and screw Maria” makes him simply juvenile and mentally ill! Man up Mark and stop acting like a snivelly 12 year old!
clnurnberg on June 27, 2009 at 10:31 AM
Not to get a conspiracy theory on you but – isn’t this Obama’s preferred method of removing his competition? First – wast it Ensign? Now Sanford. And sure they did it- so did Obama’s other opponents – but the way it gets exposed and the timing is so very convenient – isn’t it? I think Obama has a little Nixon in him. I think he’s got his own G. Gordon Liddy working somewhere in the back ground taking these men down one by one.
And if that’s true, then Palin – who airs her flaws and scandals out on the line for everyone to see – may be the last woman standing that he can’t get to. because one by one, we are going to watch the leaks drip drip drip until the party is completely demoralized and there is no one left with the stature to face down this jerk — except for Palin. Honesty is the best policy.
Just a thought.
Saw Transformers. Awesome movie. I highly recommend – especially the part where they subtly hint that Obama is a complete douchebag.
BrideOfRove on June 27, 2009 at 5:05 PM
I’m not assuming anyone is anything; I wasn’t name calling. I think it’s safe to assume though that no one here knows the woman personally, and if anyone does, a character sketch would be great.
Sure, you can judge anyone by any of their actions, and you can do it in any tantrum style you like, and you’ll be judged on that. How you were raised shows.
I’m not morally neutral, but I don’t jump to yell obscenities at a woman I know little about. I was raised better than that.
lili on June 27, 2009 at 7:37 PM
You ASSUMED that when posters identified this woman as a ho that they were doing so “in anger”. You ASSUMED that posters were “tossing without thought” a word that you find objectionable. And you did so “without knowing any of us personally.”
marybel posted the following on another thread…
I saw this on another site (Palmetto Scoop, I think) and thought you’d like it added to the mix. I’m not being facetious:
INTERESTING POST from the Post and Courier
Posted by AnaLaura on June 26, 2009
“See a picture of the home breaker, she had a habit, she has been sleeping around with a powerful (and mafia) man (alberto Fernandez) from the Argentinean government, I know, I live in the US but I was born in Argentina. Heck, many argentineans, including me, we speak 5 languages, but we do not sleep around and we do not break homes.”
“This woman also slept around with the local “Ted Turner” of Buenos Aires, Daniel Haddad hired her as an informal commentator even if she had no formal training. She broke his marriage too, he had 4 or 5 kids, and when their affair came to light she was sent by his news channel to cover AFGHANISTAN, maybe Haddad’s wife ask him to do that, to get rid of this whore.
“She is a jaded divorcee and a gold-digger, a climber. Sorry mr Sanford, she “loved” you as much as she loved other “strong” men, not afraid to get close to mafia, in Argentina…”
http://www.postandcourier.com/news/2009/jun/26/mystery_woman_vigorous_athletic87333/
*****************************************************************
Video: Maria Belen Chapur
http://www.charlotteobserver.com/747/story/800761.html
*****************************************************************
Marsh on June 27, 2009 at 8:35 PM
LMAO
Translation: “Stop judging her for effing a married man! Or I’ll judge YOU for your posting styles!!!!!”
Translation: “I do too know the difference between right and wrong! I know how EVIL it is to speak plainly about a woman who ONLY comitted adultery!!!”
Translation: I am WAAAAAAY better than you!
Marsh on June 27, 2009 at 8:44 PM
What other slurs do you like to use?
The Race Card on June 27, 2009 at 9:23 PM
Wow, Marsh, if you’re really a male given the name, you’re one hateful guy. You don’t know anything about me and yet you assume so much based on a few words, a thing you say I’m not supposed to do. Why, because I’m a woman? You purposely twist what I say to buff your ego. Why, has it been stepped on that often, a little scuffed, is it? And you all but call me and other women who may agree with me whores further up the thread. I don’t need to ask why on that one, and the other whys don’t require replies considering you’ll twist them to pat yourself on the back.
You’re a waste of time, Marsh, as I “assume” you’ve been told many times before.
Look in a mirror, man, you need help for your misogyny.
lili on June 28, 2009 at 8:25 AM
lili on June 28, 2009 at 8:25 AM
You’ve assumed incorrectly again.
I am not a man.
But, I am someone who knows that you identify yourself w/ Sanford’s ho for a reason.
Lili, there is right and wrong in the world, and whether or not Sanford’s ho baked cookies for the kids in her neighborhood, and gaves all her money to the poor is irrelevent. When she slept w/ someone else’s husband she became a ho.
Now, if she repents and never does it again, then she will be a reformed ho. More better. Get it now?
Marsh on June 28, 2009 at 9:16 AM
One more thing, Lilli, when you try to scold others for assuming and judging, it would be a good idea if you refrained from it too.
Otherwise you lose credibility and will be called on your hypocrisy.
Marsh on June 28, 2009 at 9:23 AM
Sanford has a GREAT platform. That’s all we should be thinking about… do we really want him replaced with a lefty? hm
Libertarian Joseph on June 28, 2009 at 6:40 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2