Kim threatens “fire shower of nuclear retaliation” or something
posted at 12:14 pm on June 25, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Yesterday, my friends Jeff & Lee at KKMS Radio asked me what would happen next in North Korea, which had dropped off the radar screen for the most part during the Iranian uprising. I predicted that the attention-seeking dictator Kim Jong-Il would shortly make a wild threat in order to get some media attention. Right on time:
North Korea vowed Thursday to enlarge its atomic arsenal and warned of a “fire shower of nuclear retaliation” in the event of a U.S. attack, as the regime marked the 1950 outbreak of the Korean War.
The anniversary came as the U.S. Navy followed a North Korean ship suspected of carrying weapons in violation of a U.N. resolution punishing Pyongyang’s May 25 nuclear test, and as anticipation mounted that the North might test-fire short- or mid-range missiles in the coming days. …
State-run newspapers in Pyongyang ran lengthy editorials accusing the U.S. of invading the country in 1950 and of looking for an opportunity to attack again. The editorials said those actions justified North Korea’s development of atomic bombs to defend itself.
The North “will never give up its nuclear deterrent … and will further strengthen it” as long as Washington remains hostile, Pyongyang’s main Rodong Sinmun newspaper said.
In a separate commentary, the paper blasted a recent U.S. pledge to defend South Korea with its nuclear weapons, saying that amounted to “asking for the calamitous situation of having a fire shower of nuclear retaliation all over South Korea.”
Has there ever been a dictator with such a need for global attention? Kim acts like a spoiled child, throwing tantrums as a means to get concessions. Parents can teach their children to stop throwing tantrums by ignoring them, but unfortunately that doesn’t work with nuclear-armed dictators.
The US continues to follow the North Korean ship, the Kang Nam, apparently on its way to Burma. The US and other nations believe that the Kang Nam carries missile parts, a violation of UN sanctions. As yet, though, no one has decided to intercept the ship before it gets to its destination. Kim has warned that he would consider such interdictions an act of war, and if the US risks that kind of response, they had better find something of interest when they do. A cargo of minerals would still be a violation of sanctions, but it would embarrass the US and its allies. The ship may have to dock in Hong Kong for refueling, and I suspect that the US will try something a little more covert first.
Meanwhile, Kim still plans his missile tests for the 4th of July. He has declared a “no-sail” zone around the Korean peninsula for “military drills,” but people widely expect that he’s clearing the area to launch short- and medium-range missiles. This would be another UN violation, which will result in a strongly-worded memo from the UN, which will result in another temper tantrum from Kim. He has this down to a science.
Update: Comments somehow got disabled on this post; I’ve re-enabled them. Sorry about that.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
alohapundit on June 25, 2009 at 2:37 PM
LoL
ahh, thanks for that little rant~
bridgetown on June 25, 2009 at 2:40 PM
My palate is cleansed…
:)
alohapundit on June 25, 2009 at 2:44 PM
I wonder if any nightmare scenario analysis have been done?
Like if the missile guidance puts ten meg in down town Beijing or say it really overshoots and hits Mexico City?
I doubt seriously that we have military air space authority anywhere along an inland flight path and we have (apparently) an 18 in 22 chance of shooting it down.
Speakup on June 25, 2009 at 2:44 PM
Go ahead Kim..”Make My Day!”
Jeff from WI on June 25, 2009 at 2:58 PM
Rumor has there’s lots of radio interference in that part of the world – sunspots or something.
All kinds bad things can happen without anybody knowing about it….
That is… not until their rights are read to them… THEN bad things can happen..
Zam88 on June 25, 2009 at 3:01 PM
Before mouthing off, Kim-Ding-Dong had better talk with mayors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
byteshredder on June 25, 2009 at 3:12 PM
A “no sail” zone around the entire peninsula? Wouldn’t that sort of constitute an agressive act against the nation immediately to the south as well as all the others that use those waters for international shipping?
Piss on him. The world should call this little creep’s bluff by anchoring anything they can find that floats right off his coastline, then dare him to do something about it. What’s he going to do, launch a SCUD barrage? You remember SCUDs right? Saddam launched dozens that ended up killing two goats and knocking over a mailbox.
RobertE on June 25, 2009 at 3:26 PM
See, this is exactly why I shouldn’t be President.
Hey, Kim, you keep that up and I’ll turn N. Korea into a parking lot for the new Super Wal-Mart in Seol. You’ve been warned. Knock. It. Off.
I R A Darth Aggie on June 25, 2009 at 5:44 PM
Does North Korea have the capabilites?
Does North Korea have the intention to launch?
And,do you think,North Korea has the will?
—————————————————–
Currently in North Korea,the best description,living inside NK,would be a living hell,
contrast,that against NK target Hawaii,paradise,heaven on
earth,so to speak!!
It might be in some warped way,a symbol that NK hates!!!
I think,their dead serious!
Btw,technically,South Korea,as well as the United States
are still AT WAR WITH NORTH KOREA!!!!
canopfor on June 25, 2009 at 5:48 PM
Maybe. But I figure it’s a mighty fine object lesson for the next dictator in line…
ThereGoesTheNeighborhood on June 25, 2009 at 11:29 PM
Yeah, he’s almost as bad as the United States’ Narcissist In Chief, or should that be NOTUS?
{^_^}
herself on June 26, 2009 at 3:23 AM
Just send a message for everyone that wants to live to move to within 5 miles of the gate at the parallel.
Then modify the rest of the landscape with some of our technology that does work.
workingforpigs on June 26, 2009 at 11:21 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2