Ahmadinejad snubbed by Iranian parliament

posted at 10:11 am on June 25, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

What if a ranting lunatic threw a victory party and no one came?  Mahmoud Ahmadinejad got snubbed by at least 180 members of the Iranian parliament when they no-showed the newly re(s)elected President’s fab-oo celebration.  The insult sent a message to Ahmadinejad and the mullahs that love him:

More than 180 Iranian MPs appear to have snubbed an invitation to celebrate President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s election win, local press reports say.

All 290 MPs were invited to the victory party on Wednesday night, but only 105 turned up, the reports say.

A BBC correspondent says the move is a sign of the deep split at the top of Iran after disputed presidential polls.

That certainly implies that Ahmadinejad — and the mullahs — have lost the majority of the mullah-approved ruling class.  Remember that the Guardian Council approves candidates not just for president but also for Parliament.  Every MP owes his position in part to the same mullahcracy that rigged the election for Ahmadinejad.  Defying the mullahs and mocking Ahmadinejad puts their own positions at risk — unless they figure that the momentum has already swung away from Ahmadinejad and the Guardian Council.  It’s certainly a vote of no-confidence.

So what does a ranting lunatic figurehead do when his legitimacy is threatened?  Call someone else “Bush” (via Allahpundit’s Twitter feed):

[Ahmadinejad] advised Mr Obama to take a different approach from his predecessor President George W Bush.

“I hope you (Obama) will avoid interfering in Iran’s affairs and express regret in a way that the Iranian people are informed of it,” Mr Ahmadinejad said.

“Will you use this language with Iran (in any future dialogue)? If this is your stance, there will be nothing left to talk about. Do you think this behaviour will solve the problem for you? This will not have any result except that the people will consider you somebody similar to Bush.”

The Guardian has done a good job each day keeping up with the latest developments in Iran.  Today’s omnibus post reports that Mirhossein Mousavi has become even more defiant:

“I am ready to show how the electoral wrong-doers, standing beside the main agitators that have caused the present disturbances, have spilled people’s blood. I would not, for the sake of personal expediency and fear in the face of threats, withdraw for one moment my demands for the return of the rights of the Iranian people, whose blood is being unjustly spilled today.”

He added: “(The people’s) problem is with millions of votes whose fate is unknown.”

Calling for people to keep calm while resisting, he goes on: “It is a must for us to neutralise this evil conspiracy through our behaviour and expressions.”

Mehdi Karroubi has called off a rally he planned for today, but the Guardian reports that others will take place today.

Update: Via Instapundit, the LA Times reports that the regime has begun rounding up academics:

Iran’s leading opposition figure, Mir-Hossein Mousavi, launched a lengthy broadside against the Iranian leadership and state-owned media in comments published today on his website as authorities arrested 70 university professors who had just held a meeting with Mousavi. …

Hundreds have been arrested for allegedly taking part or inciting disturbances, including 70 members of the Islamic Society of University Professors, who were arrested after they met with Mousavi on Wednesday afternoon. Their whereabouts are unknown, according to Kalameh.ir, Mousavi’s website.

For a regime that prefaces itself on an academic reading of Islam, that’s not a good sign.  If they’ve lost the academics, and perhaps even the mullahs, then force is the only legitimacy they have left — and that won’t last long.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

What if a ranting lunatic threw a victory party and no one came?

I instantly thought of Obama’s 4th of July party.

WashJeff on June 25, 2009 at 10:12 AM

This on top of getting univited to the Obama Crush Independence bash?

myrenovations on June 25, 2009 at 10:13 AM

WashJeff on June 25, 2009 at 10:12 AM

+1

cmsinaz on June 25, 2009 at 10:14 AM

karma

cmsinaz on June 25, 2009 at 10:15 AM

What if a ranting lunatic threw a victory party and no one came?

I instantly thought of Obama’s 4th of July party.

WashJeff on June 25, 2009 at 10:12 AM

hahahahaa

alexraye on June 25, 2009 at 10:16 AM

“Will you use this language with Iran (in any future dialogue)? If this is your stance, there will be nothing left to talk about. Do you think this behaviour will solve the problem for you? This will not have any result except that the people will consider you somebody similar to Bush.”

This Mahmoud sure does know Obama. I do not doubt for second that this statement makes Obama think twice about the actions he has taken the past couple days. I am not implying Obama will change because of this statement, but merely Obama considers it in his thought process (as opposed to dismissing it outright).

WashJeff on June 25, 2009 at 10:17 AM

You can’t put the Genie back in the bottle. The revolution will continue in Iran until the current power structure is overthrown.

Obama will take credit for it, but he owes a debt of gratitude to George W. Bush, who set up the dynamics of democracy in the middle east. Barry INHERITED this potentially game changing blessing.

Star20 on June 25, 2009 at 10:17 AM

Mirhossein Mousavi has become even more defiant:

?

Yahoo headlined this morning Mousavi removing himself from candidacy, under pressure.

maverick muse on June 25, 2009 at 10:17 AM

What if a ranting lunatic threw a victory party and no one came?
I instantly thought of Obama’s 4th of July party.

WashJeff on June 25, 2009 at 10:12 AM
hahahahaa

alexraye on June 25, 2009 at 10:16 AM

+1000

You see, there once was a king. This kind decided that he would proclaim that all his subject were insane, that HE was the only ONE who was sane. OK, who’s the lunatic?

HomeoftheBrave on June 25, 2009 at 10:20 AM

Sorry…. kind = king

HomeoftheBrave on June 25, 2009 at 10:21 AM

Mousavi still got his message wrong.

At this late date, it is NOT about the missing votes.

Sir Napsalot on June 25, 2009 at 10:21 AM

That’s OK.. Obama will still kiss his ass.

And then put more pressure on Israel….

TexasJew on June 25, 2009 at 10:22 AM

when all else fails insert Bush into the dialogue

sigh

History will treat Bush alot better then today’s morons….

cmsinaz on June 25, 2009 at 10:22 AM

The stars are aligned, the Iranian people are fed up, the members of the Iranian Parliament are snubbing their noses, millions are protesting, blood has been shed in the streets …. while our child president contemplates his navel.

An opportunity missed is an opportunity lost.

A golden opportunity missed is unforgiveable.

fogw on June 25, 2009 at 10:23 AM

So what does a ranting lunatic figurehead do when his legitimacy is threatened? Call someone else “Bush”

so him and oboobi really do have a lot in common….

SHARPTOOTH on June 25, 2009 at 10:23 AM

Yahoo removed this morning’s article claiming Mousavi quitting and replaced it with another.

in a statement posted in his official Web site, Kalemeh.

He said authorities were increasingly isolating and vilifying him to try to get him to withdraw his election challenge, but Mousavi added he would not back down.

“I am not ready to withdraw from demanding the rights of the Iranian people,” he said, adding that he was determined to prove electoral fraud and that those behind it were “the main factor for the recent violence and unrest and have spilled the blood of the people.”

He also was quoted by his Web site as saying that the Iranian people have the right to express “their opposition to what happened in the election and after that.”

Mousavi also defended himself and his movement, identified by the color green, against the barrage of claims on state media about foreign hands behind the unrest. “The green movement is not dependent on foreigners,” he said.

On Wednesday, Mousavi met with 70 university professors, the Web site said. The professors, among a group pushing for a more liberal form of government, were detained after the meeting, but it was not clear where the professors were taken, the site said.

70 missing university professors! Class dismissed.

maverick muse on June 25, 2009 at 10:23 AM

Maybe all the intellectuals will imigrate to the U.S. and we can share our fancy new healthcare system with them.

It’s only a matter of time before Barry extends the invitation to all the world.

anniekc on June 25, 2009 at 10:25 AM

If his own parliment wont talk to him, WHY SHOULD OBAMA?

happy2behere on June 25, 2009 at 10:26 AM

I hope you (Obama) will avoid interfering in Iran’s affairs and express regret in a way that the Iranian people are informed of it,” Mr Ahmadinejad said.

The only thing Obama is good at.

fourdeucer on June 25, 2009 at 10:27 AM

You can’t put the Genie back in the bottle. The revolution will continue in Iran until the current power structure is overthrown.

Obama will take credit for it, but he owes a debt of gratitude to George W. Bush, who set up the dynamics of democracy in the middle east. Barry INHERITED this potentially game changing blessing.

Star20 on June 25, 2009 at 10:17 AM

If Iran plays out like we hope, W will probably not get much credit in the present. in 20 years, though, he will be a leading person in the narrative akin to Reagan and Pope John Paul II is to Communism.

Future SAT question:

President Ronald Reagan and Pope John Paul II are to Communism as President George W Bush is to:

A) Growth of the Federal Government
B) Islamism
C) Entitlements
D) All the above

unfortunately, only B.

WashJeff on June 25, 2009 at 10:27 AM

The fuse has been sputtering fitfully, but the flame can be encouraged still.

Maquis on June 25, 2009 at 10:27 AM

Mr. Lonely should get together with Mr. Ronery.

Daggett on June 25, 2009 at 10:27 AM

I’m sure he’ll be welcome to stay overnight at the Olbermann house if he comes to NYC again.

gsherin on June 25, 2009 at 10:29 AM

Here is what I wonder: If Iran sees something of a revolution, would they install Mousavi as President (or whatever position their structure would have), based on his prominence in this situation? What is the likelihood they would hold new elections, with new candidates? I haven’t seen anyone with insight on Iran discussing this.

DrMagnolias on June 25, 2009 at 10:30 AM

Sir Napsalot on June 25, 2009 at 10:21 AM

He’s just a figurehead, trying to ride a current taking him in an unknown diection. By now, he should realize all his chips are in the center of the table and the pap about missing votes just keeps him from having to state the obvious. What started out to be routine political power plays has turned into something much more dangerous for the system.

a capella on June 25, 2009 at 10:31 AM

I just wonder if Obama sits contemplating the world and is watching the Iranians thinking it could happen to him.

BetseyRoss on June 25, 2009 at 10:32 AM

Here is what I wonder: If Iran sees something of a revolution, would they install Mousavi as President (or whatever position their structure would have), based on his prominence in this situation? What is the likelihood they would hold new elections, with new candidates? I haven’t seen anyone with insight on Iran discussing this.

DrMagnolias on June 25, 2009 at 10:30 AM

Have no clue what the Iranians would do, but I hope they can create a new constitution that rids the nation of any mullahocracy.

WashJeff on June 25, 2009 at 10:32 AM

Iran’s leading opposition figure, Mir-Hossein Mousavi, launched a lengthy broadside against the Iranian leadership and state-owned media in comments published today on his website as authorities arrested 70 university professors who had just held a meeting with Mousavi. …

And the socialists/leftists response is…

“We mustn’t intimidate Iran.”

Skywise on June 25, 2009 at 10:33 AM

SHARPTOOTH on June 25, 2009 at 10:23 AM

Out of his league, Obama wants to swim with the sharks to be one, too.

maverick muse on June 25, 2009 at 10:34 AM

What is the likelihood they would hold new elections, with new candidates? I haven’t seen anyone with insight on Iran discussing this.

DrMagnolias on June 25, 2009 at 10:30 AM

They would have to do so under the old system with the ruling mullah class vetting the candidates. I think(hope) it may have gone past that. If they don’t have an acceptable method for redoing it, the system is well and truly broken.

a capella on June 25, 2009 at 10:35 AM

MY question is once these protests are over and they have somehow overturned the election and the majority of the public gets what they want..freedom what is next? Who is going to lead them into a “western style of democracy”? This Mousavi guy IMHO is questionable, and I just wonder if he isn’t like Obama saying what people want to hear and not what they need to know. Will they draft their own constitution of some sort or bill of rights? MAybe this is too early in the game to mention but it needs to be mentioned. More importantly who in our government will stand up and help the people of Iran find the direction they need to go in order to find true freedom and prosperity?

milwife88 on June 25, 2009 at 10:37 AM

I just wonder if Obama sits contemplating the world and is watching the Iranians thinking it could happen to him.

BetseyRoss on June 25, 2009 at 10:32 AM

Well, we know the tea parties made him uneasy.

a capella on June 25, 2009 at 10:37 AM

I don’t know how this sounds with a Persian accent, but it’s fitting:

There’s no one
Just me onry
Sitting on my rittle throne
I work rearry hard and make up great prans
But nobody ristens, no one understands
Seems like no one takes me serirousry

And so I’m ronery
A rittle ronery
Poor rittle me

There’s nobody
I can rerate to
Feel rike a bird in a cage
It’s kinda sihry
But not rearry
Because it’s fihring my body with rage

I’m the smartest most crever most physicarry fit
But nobody else seems to rearize it
When I change the world maybe they’ll notice me
But until then I’rr just be ronery
Rittle ronery, poor rittle me

I’m so ronery…

DRPrice on June 25, 2009 at 10:37 AM

authorities arrested 70 university professors who had just held a meeting with Mousavi. …

And the socialists/leftists response is…

“We mustn’t intimidate Iran.”

Skywise on June 25, 2009 at 10:33 AM

The Leftists purged Western academia of any opposition, denegrating any conservatives as relics no longer relevant.

maverick muse on June 25, 2009 at 10:38 AM

What is the possibility that the mullahs would be replaced with a military junta? Would that be better, worse or more of the same? Those in power seek to stay in power, usually by any means at their disposal. This is why our republic, with free and open elections has worked until now by overriding the natural inclinations of the power-mad. It can work in Iran, but they have the same problem we have; no leadership.

SKYFOX on June 25, 2009 at 10:40 AM

This will not have any result except that the people will consider you somebody similar to Bush

The people of Iran wish Obama was their Bush.

obladioblada on June 25, 2009 at 10:41 AM

The Iranian people will still prevail, too many youngsters want the mullahs to get out of their lives.

About a year and a half from now, free Iranians of the nation of “Iran” will log on to YouTube to watch vids of American citizens battling the Federal Domestic Security Force and the Acornsiji after the ‘rats steal the 2010 election.

Iraqi’s will be debating whether to invade the U.S. and topple the American dictator.

The Kurds will establish a no-fly protection zone over most of the southern states.

For no apparent reason, France will surrender to the Marshall Islands.

You heard it here first.

Bishop on June 25, 2009 at 10:43 AM

The only party Mahmoud deserves is a Necktie Party.

profitsbeard on June 25, 2009 at 10:45 AM

anyone else hear kim jong il ronley song when they read the “lonely” tag

alexraye on June 25, 2009 at 10:46 AM

Mousavi still got his message wrong.

At this late date, it is NOT about the missing votes.

Sir Napsalot on June 25, 2009 at 10:21 AM

Isn’t there an appropriate saying about riding a tiger?

Count to 10 on June 25, 2009 at 10:46 AM

milwife88 on June 25, 2009 at 10:37 AM

Baby steps, the Iranians have had 30 years of the mullahs, that is a lot to kick over in just a week.

The public is flexing its collective muscle and when they succeed, the new government will have a ready reminder that unless they tackle real reform, then the same can happen to them.

The age of Iranian dominance through smothering religion and military force is about to end, defeated by brave, freedom seeking Iranian citizens and the power of the internet.

Bishop on June 25, 2009 at 10:47 AM

I wonder if that’s what the Penguin meant when he referred to the university being ready, in his letter to his boss?

OldEnglish on June 25, 2009 at 10:51 AM

There are no jobs so people extend their education. Now, they are purging the universities.

Blake on June 25, 2009 at 10:52 AM

Guest lists
MSM
American professors
Hollywood

Those three groups could pack his party. He should invite his western friends

seven on June 25, 2009 at 10:54 AM

The Audacity of Hope has come to Iran, and Barack Obama had nothing to do with it.

What happens next is anybody’s guess, but we need to keep praying for the people of Iran in this critical moment in their history.

Steve Z on June 25, 2009 at 10:54 AM

my first thought as to why those mullahs didn’t attend Ahmedinejad’s victory party was this:

are they afraid to come out of their house due to the protesters? maybe they are already “missing” because of Khamenhi?

does anyone know what is going on?

kelley in virginia on June 25, 2009 at 10:55 AM

Bishop on June 25, 2009 at 10:43 AM

I hope the Iranians are supportive of our efforts and send us weapons and ammo,..or at least reloading supplies. Note to any Iranians reading this,.. I need .45 ACP and .38Sp brass, large and small pistol primers, and 20 lbs Tite-Group powder. Thanks in advance.

a capella on June 25, 2009 at 10:57 AM

“This will not have any result except that the people will consider you somebody similar to Bush.”

Ahmadinejad’s pretty shrewd, really. He knows that little statement must be tearing at Obama like acid reflux.

KS Rex on June 25, 2009 at 11:01 AM

I instantly thought of Obama’s 4th of July party.

WashJeff on June 25, 2009 at 10:12 AM

Zing!

scalleywag on June 25, 2009 at 11:03 AM

The Audacity of Hope has come to Iran, and Barack Obama had nothing to do with it.

Steve Z on June 25, 2009 at 10:54 AM

True. Also true:

The Audacity of Hope has come to Iran, and Barack Obama will have nothing to do with it.

Maquis on June 25, 2009 at 11:06 AM

Note to any Iranians reading this,.. I need .45 ACP and .38Sp brass, large and small pistol primers, and 20 lbs Tite-Group powder. Thanks in advance.
a capella on June 25, 2009 at 10:57 AM

Tell you what, we need to form a trading/barter alliance on this site for all of us gun owners and reloaders. I have primers and brass but I need cheaper bullets.

Bishop on June 25, 2009 at 11:08 AM

He knows that little statement must be tearing at Obama like acid reflux.

KS Rex on June 25, 2009 at 11:01 AM

Yea, that one had to leave a mark. It should dawn on Obama now that it doesn’t matter who is in office, or what kind of speech they give, or even what kind of “gift” they have they say or how much they try to appease them… in their eyes we’re still the meddler, the instigator, and the great satan. but it won’t.

scalleywag on June 25, 2009 at 11:11 AM

I don’t know. I’m fearful that today’s protests by the Iranian people will not produce the desired outcome much like the efforts of the young chinese students in Tiananmen square.

I hope and pray for them the best despite human history.

shick on June 25, 2009 at 11:11 AM

shick on June 25, 2009 at 11:11 AM

Me too. It’s pretty much an iron grip of power over there.

scalleywag on June 25, 2009 at 11:12 AM

Hundreds have been arrested for allegedly taking part or inciting disturbances, including 70 members of the Islamic Society of University Professors, who were arrested after they met with Mousavi on Wednesday afternoon. Their whereabouts are unknown, according to Kalameh.ir, Mousavi’s website.

Ed,

This is imitating what China did after Tiananmen square.

shick on June 25, 2009 at 11:15 AM

We fixed the last election
Just like we always do
How were we to know
That the people would see through?

Now I’m hiding here in Tehran
I’m a desperate man
Send lawyers, guns, and money
The sh!t has hit the fan

Once president of Iran
A real stud duck
But if Obama doesn’t save me
I’m sh!t outta luck
I’m sh!t outta luck

Now I’m hiding here in Tehran
I’m a desperate man
Send lawyers, guns, and underage women
The sh!t has hit the fan

–Mahmound Ahmadinejad (with apologies to Warren Zevon)

Percy_Peabody on June 25, 2009 at 11:18 AM

The age of Iranian dominance through smothering religion and military force is about to end, defeated by brave, freedom seeking Iranian citizens and the power of the internet.

Bishop on June 25, 2009 at 10:47 AM

If the people succeed, but I’m pesimistic. But even if they do succeed I don’t think the smothering religion is going away. The very nature of Islam is dominance.

shick on June 25, 2009 at 11:19 AM

Does this mean I won’t have to endure another “Iran is such a fasinating place and really not that bad at all” smarmfest from NPR?

TheUnrepentantGeek on June 25, 2009 at 11:21 AM

Ahmadinejad has his own Sanford McGreevey moment.

Mr. Joe on June 25, 2009 at 11:27 AM

This Mahmoud sure does know Obama. I do not doubt for second that this statement makes Obama think twice about the actions he has taken the past couple days. I am not implying Obama will change because of this statement, but merely Obama considers it in his thought process (as opposed to dismissing it outright).

WashJeff on June 25, 2009 at 10:17 AM

Very insightful observation. Meanwhile, Obama dismisses outright all the facts of the field of economics. He is certainly capable of not taking other people’s ideas seriously.

thuja on June 25, 2009 at 11:31 AM

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad got snubbed by at least 180 members of the Iranian parliament when they no-showed the newly re(s)elected President’s fab-oo celebration. The insult sent a message to Ahmadinejad and the mullahs that love him

If recent events are any indication 180 people are about to get tortured and it won’t be water-boarding, led on a leash by a woman or wearing dirty panties on your head. Basically it will be real torture—the removal of body parts.

patrick neid on June 25, 2009 at 11:43 AM

Hey, nice dinner jacket in the main page photo.

andycanuck on June 25, 2009 at 12:02 PM

“I hope you (Obama) will avoid interfering in Iran’s affairs and express regret in a way that the Iranian people are informed of it,” Mr Ahmadinejad said.
.
This deceitful Mr Ahmadinejad is not an honorable man yet, Ahmadinejad influenced and or sustained the posture of Obama’s no pre-conditions and no meddling stance concerning Iran to not interfere. Our current foreign policy is not based pro tem of the realities of past and current events occurring in Iran. Accepting the projected hypothesis of not meddling will result in a more progressive outcome in Iran’s tyrannic regime is a mistake for American interest.
.
Our domestically challenged president Obama has proven to have no respect to the internal affairs of a pro-capitalism environment American government and now has demonstrated a poor grasp of American history accomplishments standing up for liberty for all in regards to foreign diplomacy. We must face the facts that if a tyrant regime can predicate to the proposition that some people are free and some people will not have freedom, then the American legacy is beyond the pale now of our Founding Fathers original design.

Outside Independence Hall when
the Constitutional Convention of 1787 ended,
Mrs. Powel of Philadelphia asked Benjamin Franklin,

“Well, Doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?”
.
With no hesitation whatsoever, Franklin responded,
“A republic, if you can keep it.”
.
The readers at HA are well aware that Obama could not pass an American history test even if was an open book.
He has consistently interwoven false premises with the histoical facts to reinforce his soft tyranny objectives.
.
Now here we are with this Iran situation making all the wrong moves. What should be a no brainer to foreign policy has been convoluted into a false desire to aquiesse to tyrannic regimes. We are indeed living in a very dangerous time for America. We must recoil from this presidents road to our destruction. We must reset to re-establish the United Staes preposition to of life, liberty and the pursuit of property.

Americannodash on June 25, 2009 at 12:19 PM

Hey, nice dinner jacket in the main page photo.

andycanuck on June 25, 2009 at 12:02 PM

Hey, nothing but the best from GoodWill for the leader of Iraq.

Jeff from WI on June 25, 2009 at 12:36 PM

History will treat Bush alot better then today’s morons….

cmsinaz on June 25, 2009 at 10:22 AM

Not necessarily. Some of today’s morons write tomorrow’s history books.

Michelle Dubois on June 25, 2009 at 12:37 PM

The age of Iranian dominance through smothering religion and military force is about to end, defeated by brave, freedom seeking Iranian citizens and the power of the internet.

Bishop on June 25, 2009 at 10:47 AM
If the people succeed, but I’m pesimistic. But even if they do succeed I don’t think the smothering religion is going away. The very nature of Islam is dominance.

shick on June 25, 2009 at 11:19 AM

This reminds me of the Spanish civil war… that ended with Franco and 50 years of totalitarianism. I don’t know why but hearing about the professor’s disappearance just reminded me of Stalin and Franco the most. If you kill the leaders of the opposition–which has been done before… people get too afraid to keep going.

I’m not sure this ends well at all.

One big difference is that WE know about it in real time. And the “Arab Street” knows about it too.

No one can legitimately claim that foreigners did this. They can say it is Western ideas and influence, no arguments, but that is a closed society, those reformers are native.

petunia on June 25, 2009 at 12:50 PM

The Audacity of Hope has come to Iran, and Barack Obama will have nothing to do with it.

Maquis on June 25, 2009 at 11:06 AM

No reciprocation for the weenie invitation.
Sour Grapes.

maverick muse on June 25, 2009 at 1:47 PM

Some of today’s morons write tomorrow’s history books.
Michelle Dubois on June 25, 2009 at 12:37 PM

Touché!

maverick muse on June 25, 2009 at 2:15 PM

How in the hell does Obama think he can deal with Ahmedinejad now? Even brain dead liberals and media will not allow it. He should at lease stand up for what is right. Oh wait sorry I forgot who I was talking about. Never mind….

Ed Laskie on June 26, 2009 at 1:34 AM