<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obamateurism of the Day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/24/obamateurism-of-the-day-63/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/24/obamateurism-of-the-day-63/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:36:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Will the White House press corps be more adversarial tonight?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/24/obamateurism-of-the-day-63/comment-page-2/#comment-2460167</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Will the White House press corps be more adversarial tonight?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57115#comment-2460167</guid>
		<description>[...] only print reporter who let that show in his work was the Washington Post&#8217;s Dana Milbank, who reamed the White House and the Huffington Post for setting up a question about Iran.  Walsh says that the press conferences have become more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] only print reporter who let that show in his work was the Washington Post&#8217;s Dana Milbank, who reamed the White House and the Huffington Post for setting up a question about Iran.  Walsh says that the press conferences have become more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacking the Deck: Mental Manipulation of the Public &#8212; Leftist Mainstream Media &#38; Politicians&#8217; Use of Non-Stop Bias Tactics &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/24/obamateurism-of-the-day-63/comment-page-2/#comment-2427297</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacking the Deck: Mental Manipulation of the Public &#8212; Leftist Mainstream Media &#38; Politicians&#8217; Use of Non-Stop Bias Tactics &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57115#comment-2427297</guid>
		<description>[...] we are, puppets?” and Blue on blue: Helen Thomas hammers Gibbs on Obama’s phony town hall and Obamateurism of the Day and Video: Wise Latina sends Chris Matthews to leg-thrill heaven and Olby and guest on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we are, puppets?” and Blue on blue: Helen Thomas hammers Gibbs on Obama’s phony town hall and Obamateurism of the Day and Video: Wise Latina sends Chris Matthews to leg-thrill heaven and Olby and guest on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who Would&#8217;ve Thought? WH Reporters Chip Reid and Helen Thomas Criticize Obama&#8217;s Manipulation of Media at Phony Town Hall (video) &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/24/obamateurism-of-the-day-63/comment-page-2/#comment-2375449</link>
		<dc:creator>Who Would&#8217;ve Thought? WH Reporters Chip Reid and Helen Thomas Criticize Obama&#8217;s Manipulation of Media at Phony Town Hall (video) &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57115#comment-2375449</guid>
		<description>[...] reading: Hot Air: Blue on blue: Helen Thomas hammers Gibbs on Obama’s phony town hall and Obamateurism of the Day Washington Post: Emanuel&#8217;s Mastery Of Reading Reporters Dispatches from the Culture Wars: The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reading: Hot Air: Blue on blue: Helen Thomas hammers Gibbs on Obama’s phony town hall and Obamateurism of the Day Washington Post: Emanuel&#8217;s Mastery Of Reading Reporters Dispatches from the Culture Wars: The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tartan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/24/obamateurism-of-the-day-63/comment-page-2/#comment-2360672</link>
		<dc:creator>tartan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 02:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57115#comment-2360672</guid>
		<description>Completely over the top.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Completely over the top.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Ramirez and the Death of Journalism</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/24/obamateurism-of-the-day-63/comment-page-2/#comment-2358815</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ramirez and the Death of Journalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57115#comment-2358815</guid>
		<description>[...] light of the bizarre events regarding the staged Huffington Post question at the Presidential news conference Tuesday, it was serendipitous to be at the breakfast.  Michael [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] light of the bizarre events regarding the staged Huffington Post question at the Presidential news conference Tuesday, it was serendipitous to be at the breakfast.  Michael [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RufusW</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/24/obamateurism-of-the-day-63/comment-page-2/#comment-2348800</link>
		<dc:creator>RufusW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 06:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57115#comment-2348800</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; He did not make it clear it was a planned question....
highhopes on June 24, 2009 at 11:00 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

By saying,&lt;blockquote&gt;I know that there may actually be questions from people in Iran who are communicating through the Internet. &lt;/blockquote&gt; isn&#039;t Obama implicitly stating that this is planned, that he wants HuffPo to relay a question.  The reporter has stated the question itself hadn&#039;t disclosed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> He did not make it clear it was a planned question&#8230;.<br />
highhopes on June 24, 2009 at 11:00 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>By saying,<br />
<blockquote>I know that there may actually be questions from people in Iran who are communicating through the Internet. </p></blockquote>
<p> isn&#8217;t Obama implicitly stating that this is planned, that he wants HuffPo to relay a question.  The reporter has stated the question itself hadn&#8217;t disclosed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Greenroom &#187; Forum Archive &#187; Honest Choices</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/24/obamateurism-of-the-day-63/comment-page-2/#comment-2348798</link>
		<dc:creator>The Greenroom &#187; Forum Archive &#187; Honest Choices</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 06:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57115#comment-2348798</guid>
		<description>[...] democracy by turning supposedly &#8220;impartial&#8221; reporters into political operatives. The planted questioner at Tuesday&#8217;s press conference was the kind of clumsy totalitarian fraud that would have set [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] democracy by turning supposedly &#8220;impartial&#8221; reporters into political operatives. The planted questioner at Tuesday&#8217;s press conference was the kind of clumsy totalitarian fraud that would have set [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Acephalous</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/24/obamateurism-of-the-day-63/comment-page-2/#comment-2346850</link>
		<dc:creator>Acephalous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57115#comment-2346850</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Do [conservatives] dare to eat a peach?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Two groups of people are annoyed that the administration collaborated with the Huffington Post’s Nico Pitney on a question about Iran: seasoned pool reporters invested in the pecking order who believe Pitney jumped the line, and partisan hacks whose ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Do [conservatives] dare to eat a peach?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Two groups of people are annoyed that the administration collaborated with the Huffington Post’s Nico Pitney on a question about Iran: seasoned pool reporters invested in the pecking order who believe Pitney jumped the line, and partisan hacks whose &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Do [conservatives] dare to eat a peach? &#171; The Edge of the American West</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/24/obamateurism-of-the-day-63/comment-page-2/#comment-2346800</link>
		<dc:creator>Do [conservatives] dare to eat a peach? &#171; The Edge of the American West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57115#comment-2346800</guid>
		<description>[...] pool reporters invested in the pecking order who believe Pitney jumped the line, and partisan hacks whose concern for Iran disappears the moment an opportunity to denounce the media [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] pool reporters invested in the pecking order who believe Pitney jumped the line, and partisan hacks whose concern for Iran disappears the moment an opportunity to denounce the media [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schadenfreude</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/24/obamateurism-of-the-day-63/comment-page-2/#comment-2345394</link>
		<dc:creator>Schadenfreude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57115#comment-2345394</guid>
		<description>Media is owned by the Toad in Chief, who can&#039;t decide between bbq for 4th of July in embassy and real thuggary/butchery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Media is owned by the Toad in Chief, who can&#8217;t decide between bbq for 4th of July in embassy and real thuggary/butchery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/24/obamateurism-of-the-day-63/comment-page-2/#comment-2345301</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57115#comment-2345301</guid>
		<description>Obama is just letting his inner totalitarian show.

Why so many TV appearances?  It&#039;s the American equivalent to statues and paintings of the &quot;Dear Leader&quot; everywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is just letting his inner totalitarian show.</p>
<p>Why so many TV appearances?  It&#8217;s the American equivalent to statues and paintings of the &#8220;Dear Leader&#8221; everywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/24/obamateurism-of-the-day-63/comment-page-2/#comment-2345285</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57115#comment-2345285</guid>
		<description>Front runner for Obamateurism of the Week!  Everybody knows, when you plant phony questions, they have to look real...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Front runner for Obamateurism of the Week!  Everybody knows, when you plant phony questions, they have to look real&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: highhopes</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/24/obamateurism-of-the-day-63/comment-page-2/#comment-2345205</link>
		<dc:creator>highhopes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57115#comment-2345205</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;This has got to be the winner for the week. How does it get worse than this?

apollyonbob on June 24, 2009 at 12:19 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Check out the thread on weenie diplomacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>This has got to be the winner for the week. How does it get worse than this?</p>
<p>apollyonbob on June 24, 2009 at 12:19 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Check out the thread on weenie diplomacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: White House Controlling What We Hear and How We Hear It &#8212; And Doing It In Plain Sight &#171; Quick Daily Hits &#8212; Politics and Such</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/24/obamateurism-of-the-day-63/comment-page-2/#comment-2344918</link>
		<dc:creator>White House Controlling What We Hear and How We Hear It &#8212; And Doing It In Plain Sight &#171; Quick Daily Hits &#8212; Politics and Such</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57115#comment-2344918</guid>
		<description>[...] Air:  Obamateurism of the Day Michelle Malkin:  Obama hand-holds Huffington Post blogger, snaps at dissident reporters Red [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Air:  Obamateurism of the Day Michelle Malkin:  Obama hand-holds Huffington Post blogger, snaps at dissident reporters Red [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n0doz</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/24/obamateurism-of-the-day-63/comment-page-2/#comment-2344865</link>
		<dc:creator>n0doz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57115#comment-2344865</guid>
		<description>Definitely the winner for the week... and so soon!
We should look at this pre-planted question (and the equally ridiculous plants at the so-called town halls) as the pattern for the future.  As Messiah continues to use every means possible to shape the image and the message, the use of plants may grow to the point that there won&#039;t be any legitimate questions at &quot;news&quot; conferences.
Maybe he should just do a TV show like his pal Hugo....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely the winner for the week&#8230; and so soon!<br />
We should look at this pre-planted question (and the equally ridiculous plants at the so-called town halls) as the pattern for the future.  As Messiah continues to use every means possible to shape the image and the message, the use of plants may grow to the point that there won&#8217;t be any legitimate questions at &#8220;news&#8221; conferences.<br />
Maybe he should just do a TV show like his pal Hugo&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apollyonbob</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/24/obamateurism-of-the-day-63/comment-page-2/#comment-2344703</link>
		<dc:creator>apollyonbob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57115#comment-2344703</guid>
		<description>This has got to be the winner for the week. How does it get worse than this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has got to be the winner for the week. How does it get worse than this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: highhopes</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/24/obamateurism-of-the-day-63/comment-page-2/#comment-2344666</link>
		<dc:creator>highhopes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57115#comment-2344666</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I’m not sure what, if any, damage his poor handling of foreign policy will do to his political capital and hence undermine his domestic agenda.

ProfessorMiao on June 24, 2009 at 11:00 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If a North Korean missile comes anywhere even remotely near Hawaii and he&#039;s done.  Other than that, I think the biggest threat to his scorched earth domestic agenda is public outrage and the impact that has on politicians, especially during the mid-term elections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I’m not sure what, if any, damage his poor handling of foreign policy will do to his political capital and hence undermine his domestic agenda.</p>
<p>ProfessorMiao on June 24, 2009 at 11:00 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>If a North Korean missile comes anywhere even remotely near Hawaii and he&#8217;s done.  Other than that, I think the biggest threat to his scorched earth domestic agenda is public outrage and the impact that has on politicians, especially during the mid-term elections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PattyJ</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/24/obamateurism-of-the-day-63/comment-page-2/#comment-2344491</link>
		<dc:creator>PattyJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57115#comment-2344491</guid>
		<description>Milbank goes on to say that Bams called on another pre-screened reporter, the one from Chile.  

Hail Dear Leader!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Milbank goes on to say that Bams called on another pre-screened reporter, the one from Chile.  </p>
<p>Hail Dear Leader!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProfessorMiao</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/24/obamateurism-of-the-day-63/comment-page-2/#comment-2344415</link>
		<dc:creator>ProfessorMiao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57115#comment-2344415</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Here’s what scares me.

Obama has had a very easy six months. It is only now that he is dealing with his first unscripted international affairs issue and it is hard to imagine how he could have mis-managed it any more if he tried (despite the MSM propaganda hailing his “cool approach”). What happens if North Korea does launch something in July. Then there is the whole economy thing and Obama’s clear push to get healthcare rammed through before anybody can read the details.

Obama strikes me as a one issue at a time guy and he needs to be dealing on multiple fronts all at the same time. Which of the crucial items listed above gets dropped because of Obama’s gross incompetence? I’m hoping for healthcare but that seems to be the sacred cow in the mix.

highhopes on June 24, 2009 at 10:17 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think he&#039;s far more interested in &quot;remaking&quot; America than he is in foreign policy.  That&#039;s why he&#039;s been trying to ram through so many huge changes so quickly. So he&#039;s likely to coast along on the latter, voting present and waiting for the world to come to its senses (according to his definition) while he continues to destroy America&#039;s economic foundation and guts the military.  I&#039;m not sure what, if any, damage his poor handling of foreign policy will do to his political capital and hence undermine his domestic agenda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Here’s what scares me.</p>
<p>Obama has had a very easy six months. It is only now that he is dealing with his first unscripted international affairs issue and it is hard to imagine how he could have mis-managed it any more if he tried (despite the MSM propaganda hailing his “cool approach”). What happens if North Korea does launch something in July. Then there is the whole economy thing and Obama’s clear push to get healthcare rammed through before anybody can read the details.</p>
<p>Obama strikes me as a one issue at a time guy and he needs to be dealing on multiple fronts all at the same time. Which of the crucial items listed above gets dropped because of Obama’s gross incompetence? I’m hoping for healthcare but that seems to be the sacred cow in the mix.</p>
<p>highhopes on June 24, 2009 at 10:17 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>I think he&#8217;s far more interested in &#8220;remaking&#8221; America than he is in foreign policy.  That&#8217;s why he&#8217;s been trying to ram through so many huge changes so quickly. So he&#8217;s likely to coast along on the latter, voting present and waiting for the world to come to its senses (according to his definition) while he continues to destroy America&#8217;s economic foundation and guts the military.  I&#8217;m not sure what, if any, damage his poor handling of foreign policy will do to his political capital and hence undermine his domestic agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: highhopes</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/24/obamateurism-of-the-day-63/comment-page-2/#comment-2344411</link>
		<dc:creator>highhopes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57115#comment-2344411</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;But didn’t Obama make it clear this was planned? It didn’t seem like there was any intent to hide this fact. Obama wanted a question from an Iranian and got one.

RufusW on June 24, 2009 at 10:34 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;


Then why call on a particular propagandist from the audience to &quot;ask&quot; the question?  He could have incorporated the question into his remarks or into one of the many other questions that dealt with the fact that the filthy liar in the White House has no intention of doing anything but voting &quot;present&quot; concerning this issue.  He did not make it clear it was a planned question and managed to step on the planned delivery.

More to the point, it is pretty damned scary that the filthy liar can&#039;t answer the questions posed to him by the media.  Why bother with pressers at all?  Just put up a flag behind the desk in the oval office, preempt all media programming, and have Obama give presidential addresses to the masses the way all the other dictators of the world do it.  You&#039;d never catch Chavez, Castro, or Kim Jung Il letting the media ask questions?  Why should our thug-in-chief be any different?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But didn’t Obama make it clear this was planned? It didn’t seem like there was any intent to hide this fact. Obama wanted a question from an Iranian and got one.</p>
<p>RufusW on June 24, 2009 at 10:34 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Then why call on a particular propagandist from the audience to &#8220;ask&#8221; the question?  He could have incorporated the question into his remarks or into one of the many other questions that dealt with the fact that the filthy liar in the White House has no intention of doing anything but voting &#8220;present&#8221; concerning this issue.  He did not make it clear it was a planned question and managed to step on the planned delivery.</p>
<p>More to the point, it is pretty damned scary that the filthy liar can&#8217;t answer the questions posed to him by the media.  Why bother with pressers at all?  Just put up a flag behind the desk in the oval office, preempt all media programming, and have Obama give presidential addresses to the masses the way all the other dictators of the world do it.  You&#8217;d never catch Chavez, Castro, or Kim Jung Il letting the media ask questions?  Why should our thug-in-chief be any different?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: highhopes</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/24/obamateurism-of-the-day-63/comment-page-2/#comment-2344395</link>
		<dc:creator>highhopes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57115#comment-2344395</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Nico Pitney issues a denial that question was staged.

stormin1961 on June 24, 2009 at 10:25 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

What else could poor Nico do?  Not that Huffington Post is a legitimate member of the press but it would be professional suicide to admit that you went along with a scheme that involved planted questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Nico Pitney issues a denial that question was staged.</p>
<p>stormin1961 on June 24, 2009 at 10:25 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>What else could poor Nico do?  Not that Huffington Post is a legitimate member of the press but it would be professional suicide to admit that you went along with a scheme that involved planted questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GarandFan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/24/obamateurism-of-the-day-63/comment-page-2/#comment-2344368</link>
		<dc:creator>GarandFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57115#comment-2344368</guid>
		<description>Barry didn&#039;t answer the question.......what else is new?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barry didn&#8217;t answer the question&#8230;&#8230;.what else is new?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lourdes</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/24/obamateurism-of-the-day-63/comment-page-2/#comment-2344361</link>
		<dc:creator>Lourdes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57115#comment-2344361</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
Nico Pitney issues a denial that question was staged.

stormin1961 on June 24, 2009 at 10:25 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

A word from Nico Pitney is not necessarily the word from her handlers.  Bigger players pull those strings.  Obviously, Obama knew what was to be asked because he had a highly prepared setup ready and used it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Nico Pitney issues a denial that question was staged.</p>
<p>stormin1961 on June 24, 2009 at 10:25 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>A word from Nico Pitney is not necessarily the word from her handlers.  Bigger players pull those strings.  Obviously, Obama knew what was to be asked because he had a highly prepared setup ready and used it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RufusW</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/24/obamateurism-of-the-day-63/comment-page-2/#comment-2344332</link>
		<dc:creator>RufusW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57115#comment-2344332</guid>
		<description>But didn&#039;t Obama make it clear this was planned?  It didn&#039;t seem like there was any intent to hide this fact.  Obama wanted a question from an Iranian and got one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But didn&#8217;t Obama make it clear this was planned?  It didn&#8217;t seem like there was any intent to hide this fact.  Obama wanted a question from an Iranian and got one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stormin1961</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/24/obamateurism-of-the-day-63/comment-page-2/#comment-2344308</link>
		<dc:creator>stormin1961</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=57115#comment-2344308</guid>
		<description>Nico Pitney issues &lt;a href=&quot;http://storminsmorningjava.blogspot.com/2009/06/michelle-plants-vegetables-obama-plants.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a denial&lt;/a&gt; that question was staged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nico Pitney issues <a href="http://storminsmorningjava.blogspot.com/2009/06/michelle-plants-vegetables-obama-plants.html" rel="nofollow">a denial</a> that question was staged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
