Hey morons, I went to the link, but I didn’t see what was being quoted, and I didn’t take the time to dig for it because I shouldn’t have to. A link is not proper attribution, it is pure laziness, and amateurish, and HotAir can do better, and it should.

woodNfish on June 24, 2009 at 3:54 PM

The only laziness on display here is you not reading the article. Your outrage is rooted in your own laziness. The practice of link-attribution is long accepted on the internet. In short, everyone does it. Everywhere. It’s how you back your shit up. With linkage. If you’re to lazy to read what is being linked to — or lazier still to use your browsers “search” function to highlight a particular phrase on the page — don’t get all holier-than-thou pissy with the guy who backed his shit up by providing you with the link, just admit your laziness and move on silently.

Hey morons, I went to the link, but I didn’t see what was being quoted, and I didn’t take the time to dig for it because I shouldn’t have to. A link is not proper attribution, it is pure laziness, and amateurish, and HotAir can do better, and it should.

What could so completely rearrange a man’s entire view of the world – other, of course, than some terrible disease afflicting his mind?
The answer is obvious: The Jews.”

My vote is for “some terrible disease afflicting his mind”. The dude is over-the-top, bat-$hit crazy.

The shaved head (because she’s losing her hair); the stylish “I’m so cool and smart” eyeglasses; the mandatory facial hair (“since my whole being revolves around my genitals, then I should treat my face as an extension of my pubic region”).

I’ve met a millions fags like this clown — they’re annoying, self-absorbed, and they’re cowards. I loathe them. (And I wonder why I’m single… LOL)

What could drive a man from admiration and defense for a governor from Texas who hewed to Sullivan’s then-preferred doctrine of subsidiarity to calling him a war criminal? What could so completely rearrange a man’s entire view of the world – other, of course, than some terrible disease afflicting his mind?

Answer – CULT, he needs deprogrammed. Obama Obama Obama really nobody has figured out this is a Cult you used words like devotee and disciples…what word was missing – CULT.

Do you know who figured out this is a Zombie movement? MT Pundit.

What could so completely rearrange a man’s entire view of the world

Well for some, money will do the trick. Look at Scott Ritter and the whole oil for food fiasco.

I used to make a point to watch Sullivan when he showed up to argue on CSPAN or news forums. Then again, I used to watch CSPAN and news forums.

Sullivan could debate brilliantly

However about the time the gay marriage push hardened the heart of the conservative pharoahs who refused to give it their blessing, Sullivan did a 180 faster than you can say “Pope Benedict does not support the romantic image of the gay priest much less gay marriage either”

IMHO, Sullivan’s brave new world, for which he left his motherland, turned out to be a gay bashing bust. His church of Peter of Toole and Lawrence of Arabia, or was it Becket, has gone back to celibacy and gay suppression and the romance is gone, the bloom is off the rose and it shows, in his prose

entagor on June 24, 2009 at 2:46 AM

Gay marriage was Sullivans last best hope to become a US citizen. With his HIV status preventing him from becoming a citizen on his own, by promoting gay marriage and all the legal rights associated with marriage, the impediment to his citizenship would have been removed.

After trying for years to get himself an exemption to the restrictions on citizenship for those with HIV infection, which he thought he would get by supporting bush, once it became clear that Gay Marriage wasn’t in the immediate future cards he got angry.

And You won’t like Milky Glutes when he gets angry…Just ask Trig.

Poor Andy, his politics and his bitterness is driven by his loose a$$hole. If he would have just used common sense and protection, he would have his citizenship already and still be posing as a conservative.

Instead he is trapped in his bitter life of foreign worker who posts ads on anonymous sex websites for more unprotected sex. “Milky GLutes” as his handle has been for years milked the system and came up with nothing.

Sadley his new hero doesn’t support gay marriage either but like Arriana Huffington, hell hath no fury like a fat overmake-up’d big haired divorced lonely woman with a bad accent and a penchant for talking out of the wrong end of her life support system.

holygoat on June 24, 2009 at 9:21 AM

Thanks,

genius

.

woodNfish on June 24, 2009 at 9:10 AM

Good morning andrew, errr, woodnfish. So, you got a weed up your *ss or what? The end quote mark is, at the end of the quote, after the word Jews. And the attribution is in the form of a link, also there at theend of the quote.

So, just what is it about Hot Air that you people don’t think you need to give attribution when quoting someone? And in the particular case above, just where does the quote end, as you didn’t bother to close the quote anywhere that I can find.

Are you professionals or just hacks? Give attribution or stop posting these quote threads!

woodNfish on June 24, 2009 at 9:10 AM

The attribution is in the link, genius.

Are you professionals or just hacks? Give attribution or stop posting these quote threads!

woodNfish on June 24, 2009 at 9:10 AM

The attribution is in the link, genius.

Are you professionals or just hacks? Give attribution or stop posting these quote threads!

Does anyone but a blog owner care about this mope?

Akzed on June 24, 2009 at 9:03 AM

It seems like the blogosphere is more like high school, with its cliques and petty spats between rival bloggers. Oh! That’s news!/sarc

I THINK the general opinion is that they are mishapen over time (adversely affected) by their behaviors, after first starting out as normal in size with other males.
Lourdes on June 24, 2009 at 8:44 AM

Gayishness plays hell with the anal suspensor in much the same way.

THE DISTINCTION THERE IS that the it is suggested that their behavior has modified their brains over time.

That, at some point, the differences didn’t exist, but over time, throughout the behaviors of male homosexuality, their brains actually are changed/modified by the physical affects.

Their brains are smaller than heterosexual males, specifically, with other changes noted that they’re generally the size of female brains though in the bodies of adult males of a larger size…

It’s grim and gruesome, but brains aren’t dissected while people are still alive, so, thus, they’re only examined in such details after death (d’oh), so there’s a limitation there as to being able to map the changes as they occur and since many gay males aren’t early-in-life getting frequent, ongoing MRIs and CATscans to capture the appearance of their brains over the lifetimes later, the questions remain: are they mishapen at origin or over time.

I THINK the general opinion is that they are mishapen over time (adversely affected) by their behaviors, after first starting out as normal in size with other males.