Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Obama’s economy?

posted at 12:14 pm on June 22, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

Barack Obama has managed to ride out his first five months in office by blaming his predecessor for the economic tribulations he “inherited”, but new polling shows that excuse running out of steam.  Although a majority still give George Bush more blame than Obama, those numbers have fallen quickly as Obama’s stimulus spending fails to stop runaway unemployment, according to Rasmussen:

While most U.S. voters still blame the Bush Administration for the nation’s economic problems, a growing number are inclined to blame President Barack Obama.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 39% of voters now say the country’s economic problems are caused more by the policies Obama has put in place. That’s a 12-point jump from a month ago.

Fifty-four percent (54%) still say the country’s economic woes are due to the recession Obama inherited from President Bush. That figure is down eight points from 62% from early June.

That’s a 20-point shift, a significant movement in just two weeks.  The biggest factor may be the unemployment report in early June that showed joblessness rising much faster than Obama’s team had predicted, even without a $787 billion stimulus bill.  If so, then we can expect a major shift when unemployment crosses the double-digit threshold, as even Obama predicts it will this year.  We can call that the expiration date for blaming Bush, and the moment when the economy becomes Obama’s fault, as his expensive and expansive policies fail to arrest the economic decline.

The crosstabs, as always, show some interesting motion.  Majorities of both whites and blacks blame Bush, but a majority of “Others” (primarily Asians and Hispanics) blame Obama, 54%-43%.  Independents split on the question, 48%-46%, leaning towards blaming Obama, a big problem if that moves towards a majority. Democrats and Republicans have predictable splits, as do conservatives and liberals, but the most interesting split comes in the Political Class demographics.  Without leaners, a plurality of self-described “mainstream” people blame Obama, while 100% of the self-professed political class blame Bush.

Nor does it look good for the future of Obama’s economic policy.  This question had less to do with the current crisis and more to do with Obama’s policies for reversing it.  A large majority believes they know better than Obama about economic issues, 60%-30%.  That holds true in almost every demographic category, with a few notable exceptions.  Blacks trust Obama more than themselves, 72%-21%, and liberals by 54%-30%, but Democrats can’t even get a majority for that position, 48%-37%.  Independents trust themselves more than Obama by a whopping 76%-19%, almost identical to Republicans.  A majority of higher-income workers (between $60-100K) blame Obama; the under-$20K demographic, which one could expect to be loyal to Obama, trust themselves more than Obama’s economic leadership, 49%-39%.

Obama only has a few weeks at most to keep using the “inherited from my predecessor” defense, if that.  The next joblessness report comes out in early July, and it will probably spell an end to that defense, as well as support for Obamanomics in general.

Update (AP): If it’s not Obama’s economy yet, it will be soon.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

I remember when he was being criticized a couple weeks after the election and people said to at least wait 6 months. Well time is up Mr. President.

sammypants on June 22, 2009 at 12:16 PM

Wait, wait…

So governments DONT create jobs?

Spending by a bureaucracy DOESNT improve the economy?

Offering out of work computer programmers jobs sodding the national mall ISNT a key to economic recovery?

So Socialism DOESNT work?????

Why didn’t anyone tell us? If only there were dozens of historical examples of command/centrally planned economies failing, and zero examples of socialist economic success, then and only then we could have avoided this disaster!!!

battleoflepanto1571 on June 22, 2009 at 12:17 PM

I told you back in January this “blame bush” thing had a window of 6 months. People hate passing the buck.

lorien1973 on June 22, 2009 at 12:18 PM

Might be looking pretty weak in 2012, I think…

cs89 on June 22, 2009 at 12:18 PM

Sooner or later, you’re going to own it.

moc23 on June 22, 2009 at 12:19 PM

Love the golf cart pic. It looks like they are driving sideways off a cliff.

bitsy on June 22, 2009 at 12:19 PM

This is 0bama’s recession/depression, just like it was FDR’s. I don’t care under whose administration it started, it is up to you (the current administration) to fix it.

cjs1943 on June 22, 2009 at 12:19 PM

Recessions come and go but the Obama/Democrat policies have ensured that the economy cannot recover.

myrenovations on June 22, 2009 at 12:20 PM

The republican absence during all this has not been forgotten. They really have been pathetic. Steele only sends out emails when they want money. And the R’s aren’t doing anything to win fiscal cons. So what good does it do them; that’s the real question.

lorien1973 on June 22, 2009 at 12:20 PM

but a majority of “Others” (primarily Asians and Hispanics) blame Obama, 54%-43%.

Those racists. /s

Independents split on the question, 48%-46%, leaning towards blaming Obama, a big problem if that moves towards a majority.

THIS is very interesting. If indies is where elections are won and lost, 2010 should be a gain for the Repubs.

portlandon on June 22, 2009 at 12:21 PM

From the AP link:

Despite signs that the recession gripping the nation’s economy may be easing, the unemployment rate is projected to continue rising for another year before topping out in double digits

Double digits could be a bunch. 10%, 20%, 99%?

I’m waiting for Obama to give a speech claiming he will continue to ’save or create’ jobs and promising unemployment will never exceed double digits on his watch!

cntrlfrk on June 22, 2009 at 12:21 PM

If Barry stimulates the economy in the woods, and there’s no job growth, will the MSM make a sound?

Loxodonta on June 22, 2009 at 12:21 PM

Yes, that’s true. And it’s mainly due to the massive earthquake known as T.E.A. parties.

T = Taxed
E = Enough
A = Already

Do not be deceived by ANYTHING you read in the state-run media on this subject – a new political movement has been birthed and it’s a healthy little thing growing like a weed.

Lying dinosaur politicians fear us, as well they should.

platypus on June 22, 2009 at 12:24 PM

Actually, this is where the MSM’s campaign in 2008 is still paying some dividends.

If you recall, in 2008 they had convinced a good deal of the voters that the Republicans controlled congress from 2006-8 and the voters decided to teach those bums a lesson.

The economy is Obama’s – but only slightly because of his policies as President – mostly due to his, and the Democrats, policies in Congress.

However, people are turning around faster then I thought. And this is before Obama pushes through tax and hide (aka cap and trade).

18-1 on June 22, 2009 at 12:25 PM

Loxodonta on June 22, 2009 at 12:21 PM

:D Thanks..needed that with the day I’m having.

HoustonRight on June 22, 2009 at 12:26 PM

I wish more people read this back in September when it was published. Maybe we wouldn’t have Obama as president. Then again, few would have believed it. And now it’s becoming reality.

Barack Obama and the Strategy of Manufactured Crisis

By the way, the article has a great chart that connects the dots between all the far left radicals, radical organizations, etc., and Obama.

Daggett on June 22, 2009 at 12:26 PM

Those jack@ass “uhdults” in the 0 administration don’t even hide the fact that they want to blame Bush.

Guess Who Wishes Bush Was Back

By David S. Broder
Sunday, June 21, 2009

In a conversation the other day with a White House official, I heard something I’d never expected from an employee of Barack Obama’s. “I wish,” he said, “George Bush would speak up a little more.”

In the five months since he left the presidency, Bush has immersed himself in his memoir. He has stayed home in Texas and rarely spoken publicly. The result has been that he has largely disappeared from the news and — the point the Obama aide was making — pretty much has been forgotten.

Bush’s silence has made it harder for Obama to keep the public focused on Bush as being responsible for our present difficulties — the weak economy, the unsettled wars, the scandals of Guantanamo and the detainee program.

It is not for lack of trying. Obama regularly reminds the public in his speeches and news conferences of all the problems he inherited from his predecessor. But to reporters covering the White House, those reminders have become familiar boilerplate. And since Bush won’t fight back, they rarely get much coverage.

Five months into his tenure, Obama has become the only president the American people think about. And a series of polls last week showed that when Americans think about Obama, they are becoming increasingly critical.

Brat on June 22, 2009 at 12:26 PM

If Barry stimulates the economy in the woods, and there’s no job growth, will the MSM make a sound?

Loxodonta on June 22, 2009 at 12:21 PM

Everything your comment brings to my mind is NSFW. I need some brain cleanser for the mental pictures.

platypus on June 22, 2009 at 12:26 PM

MSM: “Obama’s poll numbers are tanking. Let’s go back in time and find a story about Bush or Cheney killing puppies or stealing candy from babies.”

portlandon on June 22, 2009 at 12:26 PM

Just keep showing the unemployment graph with Obama’s predictions with and without the stimulus. Not many statements about the economy are needed beyond that graph to change people’s opinions that have not been altered yet.

WashJeff on June 22, 2009 at 12:26 PM

The first rule of leadership… he owned it as of January 20, 2009.

regal on June 22, 2009 at 12:27 PM

Do not understand how our Legislative Branch gets out of shouldering it’s share of the blame month after month. It was their members who protected Fannie and Freddie(two of the major contributors to the crash)from oversight and reform. They, too, allowed the Fed to get away with not enforcing rules that might have lessened the impact or even prevented it. Not, of course, letting O off the hook–but would surely love to put certain members of the House and Senate onto that hook with him. Does the general public not realize the huge part these played or do they know and don’t care.

jeanie on June 22, 2009 at 12:27 PM

I know I am a ‘right wing extremist’ and all, but I thought the “I inherited this from the previous administration” was a moronic line to begin with. Wasn’t he up on current events when he decided to run for president?

bitsy on June 22, 2009 at 12:27 PM

The 2Q belongs to Obama 100%…once companies report revenues for 2Q, the stock market is going to tank, since it’s been running on pure Obama-hype since March. No green-shoots…and the shenanigans going on with Fed and Treasury are going to really show up as the disasters they are.

I hate that things are getting this bad this quickly, but it’s good that people are getting a good dose of Dem/Socialist economics early…so they can throw Dems out of Congress before much more damage is done.

AUINSC on June 22, 2009 at 12:27 PM

Yal remember Alice Cooper’s song that goes, “School’s out for summer! School’s out forever!”? Cue it up, because President Skateboard seems to think he is on a perpetual vacation.

Can you ever remember in the history of this nation having a President this whiny, petulant, childish, or out to lunch? Me either!

And this is the time where, to all those who wanted to tell Bush he had to make right Iraq because HE broke it, and WE had to fix it, how about owning this mess and fixing it! MORONS!

freeus on June 22, 2009 at 12:28 PM

So When will Michael Moore make his first movie critical of Obama?

ChunkyLover on June 22, 2009 at 12:28 PM

So When will Michael Moore make his first movie critical of Obama?

ChunkyLover on June 22, 2009 at 12:28 PM

When pigs fly out my butt.

Daggett on June 22, 2009 at 12:29 PM

Oh, and one more point. If we do see the numbers really turning against Obama and the Dems leading up to 2010 we have to focus on getting conservatives elected.

As we’ve seen with the likes of McCain and Specter the Republican party runs far too many moderates for office and gives them far too much power to get anything of note done.

18-1 on June 22, 2009 at 12:29 PM

yeah baby, it’s time for oboobi to man up!

SHARPTOOTH on June 22, 2009 at 12:29 PM

Wasn’t he up on current events when he decided to run for president?

bitsy on June 22, 2009 at 12:27 PM

I believe that decision was made for him by Axelrod Marketing, Inc. Obama just fit the suit.

sherry on June 22, 2009 at 12:29 PM

Despite signs that the recession gripping the nation’s economy may be easing

Fasten your seatbelts. This is VERY temporary. We have yet to feel the inflationary effects of the porkulus package. There will be another round of housing forecloseures. Add to it a new round of taxes.

This is going to get worse before it gets better. The stink of it is…if we had done nothing by now we would be well on our way to recovery.

HoustonRight on June 22, 2009 at 12:31 PM

I find it ironic that Bush is being blamed at all. For the first of TARP….yes. I did not, do not, and never will agree that he signed off on that one….but everything else? Democrats, look to thine selves for this mess. It all started with the mortgage crisis, and Bush warned year, after year, it was coming, and asked for regulation. It was Franks, and Schumer, and others, who cried racism over it, and said it was all find, and dandy. If Obama wants to blame anyone, blame the real culprits for this mess.

Add to that, Obama’s insane spending, after being warned it wouldn’t work….well I’m afraid time was up a month ago. This is all Obamas’ mess now.

capejasmine on June 22, 2009 at 12:32 PM

Yup, it’s all about jobs, jobs, jobs. If you don’t have income, you don’t care about anything else.

And the “saved jobs” won’t mean crap for those out of work. I know a few already who were high on Obama and now are out of jobs and grumbling big time. But hey, I warned them when Porkulus passed that it would not craete jobs other than a few minor construction jobs.

Mr_Magoo on June 22, 2009 at 12:34 PM

I thought the “I inherited this from the previous administration” was a moronic line to begin with. Wasn’t he up on current events when he decided to run for president?

bitsy on June 22, 2009 at 12:27 PM

Barry was in the Senate, voting yes on those bloated budgets he likes to complain so much about now — not to mention adding to the bloat with his nearly $1 Billion worth of earmark requests.

AZCoyote on June 22, 2009 at 12:34 PM

HE has till september

tomas on June 22, 2009 at 12:34 PM

HE has till september

tomas on June 22, 2009 at 12:34 PM

what’s september?

SHARPTOOTH on June 22, 2009 at 12:36 PM

I do blame Bush for the fact that he’s made it too easy for Democrats to blame him for everything. A second term virtually silent, and GOP in Congress forgetting what fiscally conservative means. Oh, and if I NEVER hear “passionate conservative” again, it’ll be too soon.

Jeff from WI on June 22, 2009 at 12:36 PM

Ben Bernanke, February 09:

“Only if that is the case, in my view there is a reasonable prospect that the current recession will end in 2009 and that 2010 will be a year of recovery,” Bernanke told the Senate Banking Committee.

(emphasis mine)

Mr_Magoo on June 22, 2009 at 12:37 PM

I know I am a ‘right wing extremist’ and all, but I thought the “I inherited this from the previous administration” was a moronic line to begin with. Wasn’t he up on current events when he decided to run for president?

bitsy on June 22, 2009 at 12:27 PM
Obama had to lie, cheat and steal, to get promoted from Senator to President. There is no way anyone inherits the job of President. He uses that line to invoke sympathy as if someone died and he inherited the debt. The only thing that died was our freedom and liberty.

fourdeucer on June 22, 2009 at 12:38 PM

Guess Who Wishes Bush Was Back

Brat on June 22, 2009 at 12:26 PM

Bush: silently giving them enough rope.

CDeb on June 22, 2009 at 12:38 PM

Obama only has a few weeks at most to keep using the “inherited from my predecessor” defense, if that. The next joblessness report comes out in early July, and it will probably spell an end to that defense, as well as support for Obamanomics in general.

This became Obama’s economy the minute he got his first stimulus bill passed without any real GOP support. Objections of overspending and accountability by the GOP were drowned out by partisanship. The excuse of creating and saving jobs has turned out to be as much of a myth as Obama’s fitness for office. He and his party own this economy now and the filthy bastard is going to take some huge political hits as a result.

highhopes on June 22, 2009 at 12:39 PM

Here is your economic analogy for the day;

Your family is in your house, your house is on fire, there is a man throwing gas on the fire, does it really matter who started the fire?

ChrisM on June 22, 2009 at 12:39 PM

If his numbers continue to tank, our Community Organizer in Chief will need to manufacture another crisis. Heaven help us all.

petefrt on June 22, 2009 at 12:39 PM

Mr. Obama look in the mirror.it’s your programs that are killing this economy,you own it,it’s your..

easyone on June 22, 2009 at 12:40 PM

HoustonRight on June 22, 2009 at 12:31 PM

Exactly…that’s why having a potted plant as POTUS would have been better for the economy than having Obama.

AUINSC on June 22, 2009 at 12:41 PM

Unemployment is going to continue to rise for months yet to come. When inflation starts to take a foothold — which is inevitable given this Administration’s economic policies — then the whole mess will belong to Obama. Pointing fingers at past policies and the previous Administration is a very short-lived tactic.

We’ll know the tide has turned when comedians start pointing out the humorous aspects of the Obama show.

cruadin on June 22, 2009 at 12:41 PM

Once the “stimulus” passed it was his. Thanks SSC (Specter, Snowe, Collins)…you inadvertently helped by hurting us. Suckas!

SouthernGent on June 22, 2009 at 12:42 PM

Here is your economic analogy for the day;

Your family is in your house, your house is on fire, there is a man throwing gas on the fire, does it really matter who started the fire?

ChrisM on June 22, 2009 at 12:39 PM

And how many times did we hear a “fire” analogy on the campaign trail by the Man-Child? Good way to turn it back on him! Excellent point.

freeus on June 22, 2009 at 12:42 PM

Obama’s economy = The looting of America

byteshredder on June 22, 2009 at 12:42 PM

And unemployment will continue to rise under Obama – REGARDLESS of what he does. The business community does not TRUST the deceiver in office. The business community will start hiring again when Obama has been rendered ineffective in socializing America. BUT I can guarantee you this. If you want to see a flow blown depression with 20-30% unemployment then go ahead and pass, Cap & Trade, National Health Care and EFCA. If these get passed then in 2010 America will look like Iran today.

izoneguy on June 22, 2009 at 12:42 PM

You guys just don’t understand economics. See, the problem with our economy is healthcare and energy. It’s not the regulations, the bursting of another bubble, or years of irresponsibility biting us in the arse…it’s the future energy sources that do not exist yet, and socialized healthcare that will bring us out of recession!!!

Joking…I always laugh when I hear Obama relate energy and healthcare to our recession.

Shock the Monkey on June 22, 2009 at 12:42 PM

I know I am a ‘right wing extremist’ and all, but I thought the “I inherited this from the previous administration” was a moronic line to begin with. Wasn’t he up on current events when he decided to run for president?

bitsy on June 22, 2009 at 12:27 PM

Bush never blamed Clinton for his inheriting the 9/11 attacks, or his inheriting Clinton’s recession.

You’re absolutely right, of course. Using the word “inherit” is moronic. In reality, O’bama asked to take possession of the problems that happened on his predecessor’s watch. If he didn’t want to “inherit” them, he could have simple ended his candidacy.

Del Dolemonte on June 22, 2009 at 12:43 PM

Bush’s silence has made it harder for Obama to keep the public focused on Bush as being responsible for our present difficulties — the weak economy, the unsettled wars, the scandals of Guantanamo and the detainee program.

Five months into his tenure, Obama has become the only president the American people think about. And a series of polls last week showed that when Americans think about Obama, they are becoming increasingly critical.

Bush 43 has always been smarter than 0bama, smart as a fox, and way underestimated. He’s recovering his legacy while letting the One dig his hole, slowly but itensely.

Schadenfreude on June 22, 2009 at 12:43 PM

Blacks trust obama more than themselves 72% to 21%???? WTF?? How can ANYONE trust another person or persons more than themselves? My mind cannot wrap around that stat.

Ris4victory on June 22, 2009 at 12:43 PM

Obama had to lie, cheat and steal, to get promoted from Senator to President. There is no way anyone inherits the job of President. He uses that line to invoke sympathy as if someone died and he inherited the debt. The only thing that died was our freedom and liberty.

fourdeucer on June 22, 2009 at 12:38 PM

It is instructive here to compare Bush and Obama.

In 2001 the 9/11 plot was underway, after 8 years of the Clinton administration ignoring the rise of Islamism. Did Bush whine about Clinton’s failures? No, he fixed what was wrong as best as he could. It wasn’t perfect, but there wasn’t a single major terror attach in the US after he got in his policy changes.

In 2009 the economy was floundering – but Obama had been a Senator during the downturn and was part of the majority party. After becoming President he refused to do anything about the underlying economic issues, and just blamed his predecessor for the economy incessantly while perusing his own pet projects and paying off his cronies.

18-1 on June 22, 2009 at 12:44 PM

If Barry stimulates the economy in the woods, and there’s no job growth, will the MSM make a sound?

Loxodonta on June 22, 2009 at 12:21 PM

Everything your comment brings to my mind is NSFW. I need some brain cleanser for the mental pictures.

platypus on June 22, 2009 at 12:26 PM

Brain cleanser = Helen Thomas.

60% of the time, it works every time. :]

bluelightbrigade on June 22, 2009 at 12:44 PM

So When will Michael Moore make his first movie critical of Obama?

ChunkyLover on June 22, 2009 at 12:28 PM

When he is forced to push for a more responsible version of healthcare reform.

One of the shining glimmers of hope this past week was the number of individuals who spoke up against the filthy liar’s proposed healthcare bill because of the trillions more it was going to cost. It appears that people are finally realizing that handing your money over to the filthy liar in the White House and his corrupt party is tantamount to handing over your credit card to a teenager and telling him/her it is only for emergencies.

highhopes on June 22, 2009 at 12:44 PM

Ris4victory on June 22, 2009 at 12:43 PM

Fell out of my chair.

Bishop on June 22, 2009 at 12:45 PM

As I said in the headlines, one-term president:

“Unemployment won’t peak until this time next year, and then it will remain very high through next year,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist for Moody’s Economy.com. “It won’t get back to full employment until 2013 or 2014. This really speaks to the severity of the job losses that have been absorbed by the economy. They were massive.”

txag92 on June 22, 2009 at 12:46 PM

Blacks trust obama more than themselves 72% to 21%???? WTF?? How can ANYONE trust another person or persons more than themselves? My mind cannot wrap around that stat.

Ris4victory on June 22, 2009 at 12:43 PM

Just because slavery has ended doesn’t mean you have to leave the plantation.

CDeb on June 22, 2009 at 12:46 PM

“do blame Bush for the fact that he’s made it too easy for Democrats to blame him for everything”
Jeff from WI on June 22, 2009 at 12:36 PM
Agree that Bush and the GOP should have been more forceful when they were warned about the bad signs in the economy , I blame them for this too. But, right now, I would rather that Bush just stay quietly in Texas and let Obama dig his own grave. This is not the time to remind the Bush derangement folks of their aberrations.

jeanie on June 22, 2009 at 12:47 PM

Hey, is that POTUS giving GM’s new line of cars some free publicity (hmmm… kinda hard to tell)?

Surely this will be enough to get the car makers turned around and the economy back on the right track?

red winger on June 22, 2009 at 12:48 PM

A co-worker (single mom, $8 hr, 30hrs/wk), is all excited that Uncle Sugar is going to ‘give’ her $4,500 to buy a new car.

I can’t wait for her to try and get that $4,500 outta Uncle Sugar’s pocket. The sound of the mouse trap springing will be sweet indeed.

Limerick on June 22, 2009 at 12:48 PM

as Obama’s stimulus spending fails to stop causes runaway unemployment

Count to 10 on June 22, 2009 at 12:49 PM

This is 0bama’s recession/depression, just like it was FDR’s. I don’t care under whose administration it started, it is up to you (the current administration) to fix it.

cjs1943 on June 22, 2009 at 12:19 PM

Hmmm seemed to work okay for FDR. Millions of Americans believe that the New Deal got the U.S. out of the Depression. Don’t be surprised if something similar happens with Bambi, regardless of the economic numbers.

PackerBronco on June 22, 2009 at 12:49 PM

OT:

Remember the wide margin Obama won by in Nevada?

They are coming home:

Mason-Dixon
Job performance NV:

Obama:
Excellent/Good: 47
Fair/Poor: 50

Reid:
Excellent/Good: 43
Fair/Poor: 55

artist on June 22, 2009 at 12:49 PM

Blacks trust obama more than themselves 72% to 21%???? WTF?? How can ANYONE trust another person or persons more than themselves? My mind cannot wrap around that stat.

Ris4victory on June 22, 2009 at 12:43 PM

And most of the black commentators rush to Obama’s defense on everything. I am getting tired of all these news shows throwing up a black liberal to counter the conservative viewpoint. It does not help their cause as most of them cannot put a cogent thought together as why Obama is right.

izoneguy on June 22, 2009 at 12:50 PM

All that matters will be the two-year mark and the four-year mark.

A full-out media frenzy might continue to buoy Obama personally for two years. But the mid-term Congressional races are going to be a bloodbath for incumbents.

Four years from now? All the propaganda in the world won’t be enough to keep the blame for a 30% reduction in GDP off Obama and Socialism. (And if it is, there won’t be a country worth saving anyway.)

logis on June 22, 2009 at 12:50 PM

The Henrietta syndrome has gone airbourne. Makes me sick.

Last Friday one of my co-workers told me he “did not care” for Palin and thought obama was a “great man”. I asked him to elaborate on each assertation; all I got was a funny head tilt and crickets.

Ris4victory on June 22, 2009 at 12:50 PM

It became BHO’s economy the day he was sworn in, not before and not after.

tx2654 on June 22, 2009 at 12:50 PM

From the WaPo link:

Still, the flagging job market is likely to stir calls for further stimulus efforts…

That’s been mentioned elsewhere. If the economy doesn’t improve as much as predicted from the stimulus bill the Democrats will suggest another one is needed.

Bilby on June 22, 2009 at 12:52 PM

FDR had nothing to do with ending the Great Depression. That honor goes to Hitler and Hirohito.

Limerick on June 22, 2009 at 12:53 PM

Bilby on June 22, 2009 at 12:52 PM

I guess that is one poll they will ignore as the majority of Americans say NO MORE SPENDING.

txag92 on June 22, 2009 at 12:53 PM

This is 0bama’s recession/depression, just like it was FDR’s. I don’t care under whose administration it started, it is up to you (the current administration) to fix it.

cjs1943 on June 22, 2009 at 12:19 PM

Hmmm seemed to work okay for FDR. Millions of Americans believe that the New Deal got the U.S. out of the Depression. Don’t be surprised if something similar happens with Bambi, regardless of the economic numbers.

PackerBronco on June 22, 2009 at 12:49 PM

2009 is not 1929 – People today tend to view the government in terms of an interference not a force to help. “I am here from the government and I am here to help.” When your government starts hiring the likes of ACORN you know the seeds of rot will produce poison fruit.

izoneguy on June 22, 2009 at 12:53 PM

FDR had nothing to do with ending the Great Depression. That honor goes to Hitler and Hirohito.

Limerick on June 22, 2009 at 12:53 PM

So will Ahmadinejad and the mullahs end our recession?

izoneguy on June 22, 2009 at 12:54 PM

crickets from the state run media until absolutely necessary…….

cmsinaz on June 22, 2009 at 12:54 PM

Hey, is that POTUS giving GM’s new line of cars some free publicity (hmmm… kinda hard to tell)?

Surely this will be enough to get the car makers turned around and the economy back on the right track?

red winger on June 22, 2009 at 12:48 PM

Chrysler wuill revive too using cutting edge FIAT/YUGO drive train technology mated to a nostalgic body style, like the Challenger/Camaro, in the 1972 AMC Gremlin.

Jeff from WI on June 22, 2009 at 12:54 PM

Economists are predicting unemployment is going to be rising until the end of next year, and housing prices are going to continue falling well into next year.

Things are going to get a lot uglier than they are now, and by this time next year, everybody (except possibly Michelle O and a few brain-dead Obamabots) will understand that Obama is to blame.

AZCoyote on June 22, 2009 at 12:55 PM

Blacks trust obama more than themselves 72% to 21%???? WTF?? How can ANYONE trust another person or persons more than themselves? My mind cannot wrap around that stat.

Ris4victory on June 22, 2009 at 12:43 PM

That is something you do every time you bring your car in to a mechanic. We trust experts to do things we don’t trust ourselves with all the time.

That said, Obama is no expert on the economy, and, quite frankly, is not someone I would trust to do anything but read a speech off a teleprompter (and even then, I know he would screw up the cadence).

Count to 10 on June 22, 2009 at 12:55 PM

OT but some good news during these tough times…. Perez Hilton was punched out by the Black-eyed Peas manager in Toronto. KARMA!!!!!!!!!!

txag92 on June 22, 2009 at 12:55 PM

MSM: “Obama’s poll numbers are tanking. Let’s go back in time and find a story about Bush or Cheney killing puppies or stealing candy from babies.”

portlandon on June 22, 2009

Even better if they can twist it into Bush/Cheney killing babies or stealing candy from puppies.

SKYFOX on June 22, 2009 at 12:56 PM

I don’t know…

Recall FDR, recall how long the Great Depression went on.

Recall that FDR is STILL praised for ending the Great Depression DESPITE World War II!

Liberals (Progressives) are not going to change their stripes. Remember the adage that a person CONVINCED against their will is of the same opinion still. I think it is naive to think any significant number of liberals are going to blame Obama EVER. Sure, they will suffer with higher and higher jobless rates. But blame Obama? They NEVER blamed FDR for any of it… anything but!

This is NOT doom and gloom thinking. It happened right here in the USA, just a bit before any of us were around to experience it, but no matter how hard it is to accept, it happened. I think positive as a rule as well, but we can’t ignore history to the point of deluding ourselves that the left is going to have a serious reality check regarding President Obama.

Danzo on June 22, 2009 at 12:56 PM

Here we go. This is from March:

House Democrats are looking at yet another economic stimulus bill beyond the $787 billion one just enacted as investors and consumers continue to show little faith in the economy.

At a special meeting of the Democratic Steering and Policy Committee on Tuesday morning, Democrats heard again from their trusted band of economists and came away reinforced that Congress would need to spend billions of additional taxpayer dollars in the coming months to help pull the economy out its severe recession.

One proposal being considered is an additional economic stimulus bill. Just last month, President Obama signed a $787 billion stimulus measure that Democrats contended was needed to save or create 3.5 million jobs and that Republicans derided as nothing more than debt-spending on wasteful federal projects.

“We are going to need more taxpayer money,” Mark Zandi, the chief economist at Moody’s Economy.com and a key economic adviser to congressional Democrats, said after the meeting. “I think another stimulus package is a reasonable assumption because of the way things are going.”

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), standing with members of her leadership team by Zandi’s side, said she agreed that another stimulus bill is being considered.

“We have to keep the door open,” Pelosi said. “The word of the day is confidence. Confidence in our markets, confidence in lending, confidence in our financial institutions.”

Bilby on June 22, 2009 at 12:56 PM

izoneguy on June 22, 2009 at 12:54 PM

They could, depending on how they decide to stimulate the western economies.

Limerick on June 22, 2009 at 12:56 PM

Obama has owned this economy since the dems took control of congress.

Johan Klaus on June 22, 2009 at 12:56 PM

A co-worker (single mom, $8 hr, 30hrs/wk), is all excited that Uncle Sugar is going to ‘give’ her $4,500 to buy a new car.

I can’t wait for her to try and get that $4,500 outta Uncle Sugar’s pocket. The sound of the mouse trap springing will be sweet indeed.

Limerick on June 22, 2009 at 12:48 PM

False hope as usual. They still have to “pay” for the car. And a car is easier to repo than a house. These folks would be better off buying a cheaper used car instead.

izoneguy on June 22, 2009 at 12:57 PM

Economists are predicting unemployment is going to be rising until the end of next year, and housing prices are going to continue falling well into next year.

Things are going to get a lot uglier than they are now, and by this time next year, everybody (except possibly Michelle O and a few brain-dead Obamabots) will understand that Obama is to blame.

AZCoyote on June 22, 2009 at 12:55 PM

We are watching a repeat of the Great Depression. Like last time, it is being caused by the very remedies the government is applying. It will continue until they turn off the money spigot and stop changing the business rules.

Count to 10 on June 22, 2009 at 12:58 PM

Drawing on the affinity of POTUS for frozen treats, and the level of insanity of the two riders, can we officially christen that sweet ride the ding-dong cart?

red winger on June 22, 2009 at 12:58 PM

izoneguy on June 22, 2009 at 12:57 PM

LOL…yep….I told her that and she said that if she bought a used car she wouldn’t get the $4,500. There is nothing worse then watching people in the Dole Line.

Limerick on June 22, 2009 at 1:00 PM

OT but some good news during these tough times…. Perez Hilton was punched out by the Black-eyed Peas manager in Toronto. KARMA!!!!!!!!!!

txag92 on June 22, 2009 at 12:55 PM

LOL!!!

http://www.kolotv.com/entertainmentnews/headlines/48781182.html

If I was on the jury – Polo Molina – NOT Guility!!

izoneguy on June 22, 2009 at 1:01 PM

So will Ahmadinejad and the mullahs end our recession?

izoneguy on June 22, 2009 at 12:54 PM

Let’s hope not. If they help our economy recover the way Hitler and Hirohito did, that would mean a lot of dead Americans.

AZCoyote on June 22, 2009 at 1:01 PM

Following the current economic path we are on, no amount of artificial stimulous is going to help. We are headed straight down, full speed ahead. Double digit unemployment is just the start, the crime rate is going to mirror the unemployment rate and I am afraid our kids and grandkids for generations will suffer. There are not enough so called rich people to bring us out of this hole.

fourdeucer on June 22, 2009 at 1:01 PM

Blacks trust obama more than themselves 72% to 21%???? WTF?? How can ANYONE trust another person or persons more than themselves? My mind cannot wrap around that stat.

Ris4victory on June 22, 2009

For the past 50+ years blacks have been told my government and media that they can’t make it on their own. They require government programs to even things out. A whole generation has been raised on this bilge. Advertising works. Those who refuse to conform to this notion are labled “oreos” or worse.

SKYFOX on June 22, 2009 at 1:02 PM

OT: This should make the BDS college crowd’s heads explode

The Supreme Court announced Monday it will not give further consideration to a lawsuit brought by a fired CIA agent and her husband against high ranking Bush administration officials, including former Vice President Dick Cheney.

The decision is a victory for Cheney and his former chief of staff, I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, former White House Chief of Staff Karl Rove, and former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage. They and nine unnamed co-defendants were sued by Valerie Plame Wilson and her husband Joseph after her CIA cover was leaked to reporters.

Del Dolemonte on June 22, 2009 at 1:03 PM

He’ll just start blaming the Republicans in congress. There will always be someone to blame in the Obama presidency.

chicagojedi on June 22, 2009 at 1:03 PM

izoneguy on June 22, 2009 at 12:57 PM

LOL…yep….I told her that and she said that if she bought a used car she wouldn’t get the $4,500. There is nothing worse then watching people in the Dole Line.

Limerick on June 22, 2009 at 1:00 PM

Heh, the ZERO liability voter is Obama’s ticket.
So what – they give you a $4,500 credit to buy a new car that costs $24,500?
?? They don’t understand they still would have to pay $20,000 – and on $8 bucks an hour you should be DENIED!!! – $8 bucks an hour will get you a $7000 used car….

izoneguy on June 22, 2009 at 1:04 PM

izoneguy on June 22, 2009 at 1:01 PM

If you don’t have a weak stomach, Perez/Mario has an 11 minute video of himself describing the incident. He’s crying like the little b!tch he is.

Back on topic, I am fed up of receiving emails from Michael Steele asking for money. When is he going to do something? Where is the PR campaign slamming everything that has happened the last 6 months? It’s not like there is a lack of material to cover.

txag92 on June 22, 2009 at 1:06 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3


You must be logged in to post a comment.