Britain pulling embassy families out of Iran
posted at 3:10 pm on June 22, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
In times of overseas crisis, nations will issue travel advisories and remove non-essential staff if the situation deteriorates. The UK has decided to evacuate the families of its embassy staff and warn its citizens against travel to Iran as the regime cracks down on protesters:
The Foreign Office said today it was evacuating the families of embassy staff in Iran and advised against all non-essential travel to the country after the violent crackdown on street protests following the disputed presidential election.
The decision comes after the Iranian supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, on Friday described Britain as the “most treacherous” of Iran’s enemies and blamed foreign interference for the unrest in the country.
In response, Iran’s ambassador to London was summoned to the Foreign Office and told that Khamenei’s remarks were unacceptable. Gordon Brown later condemned the “repression” and “brutality” used against the protesters.
The Foreign Office said today: “The ongoing violence has … had a significant impact on the families of our staff, who have been unable to carry on their lives as normal. As a result, we are withdrawing dependants of embassy staff until the situation improves.
“We do not believe that it is necessary to reduce the number of staff at this time; however, we are monitoring the situation with the utmost vigilance. The security of our staff is of paramount importance.”
The UK took this step for more than just security issues, although certainly that is part of it. The move slaps the Khamenei regime for its rhetoric against Britain, and it emphasizes the danger it sees in the regime’s security forces. It’s a diplomatic as well as a security step, an escalation of Great Britain’s already bold statements against the regime, especially considering its trade relations with Iran.
That apparently didn’t sink in at Fox News, which reported the development as Britain “bailing” on Iran, as reported by Telegraph journalist Toby Harnden. In the first place, the embassy staff will remain in place, which means Britain isn’t “bailing” at all. Removal of non-essential personnel during large-scale unrest is standard operating procedure for diplomatic services, and assigning that even a hint of cowardice — which “bailing seems to imply — is grossly unfair.
The UK has taken the lead in keeping pressure on the Iranian regime, and we should be a little more supportive of its actions.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
Have they pulled American diplomats out?
Of course I don’t remember many being there. Just a question though.
upinak on June 22, 2009 at 3:12 PM
“threatens to crackdown on protestors” ?
lorien1973 on June 22, 2009 at 3:13 PM
In the word’s of the British band “Flock of Seagulls”
“and I-ran, I-ran so far away..”
RobCon on June 22, 2009 at 3:16 PM
Why would they pull out? President Obama wants to be the first leader/country to be able to congratulate the winner.
HarryStar on June 22, 2009 at 3:16 PM
Actually the BBC has taken the lead. The UK government itself has a policy of not interfering in what it considers an Iranian domestic issue and with good reason. They blowback from the last time the UK involved itself in Iranian elections helped set the stage for the Iranian revolution in the first place… unintended consequences. The US and UK governments know that that they need only stand by for now while the schism within the ruling structures of Iran unfolds. Right now staying out of this is the best way to help the demonstrators maintain momentum.
More interesting are the stories that various EU governments are preparing to use their embassies to provide shelter to Iranian dissidents… now this will be interesting to see.
lexhamfox on June 22, 2009 at 3:18 PM
AHMADINEJAD BREAKS HIS SILENCE – 6 22 09 video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3puJa2EfcM
lobosan5 on June 22, 2009 at 3:18 PM
As some of us are not able to see youtube at this moment in time. Can you tell us what it says or what happens?
upinak on June 22, 2009 at 3:19 PM
Ah the Brave Sir Robin maneuver!
LincolntheHun on June 22, 2009 at 3:19 PM
The Swiss represent the US in Iran.
lexhamfox on June 22, 2009 at 3:19 PM
Something new I learned and need to research.. TY!
upinak on June 22, 2009 at 3:21 PM
Care to summarize for those who can’t youtube?
Esthier on June 22, 2009 at 3:21 PM
Yeah, that was bad. Fixed.
Ed Morrissey on June 22, 2009 at 3:22 PM
The EU has been impressive in Iran and has been willing to speak up against the Iranian gov’t unlike Barry. We should really commend our friends in Old and New Europe for their efforts. If Dinner Jacket and Khamenei win, which sadly seems likely, the EU should take tough steps against Iran including pulling all staff out of their embassies, refusing to accept the current gov’t as legitimate, and placing tough sanctions on Iran (including travel sanctions against President Crazy and upper ranking Iranian officials). As a punishment for stealing elections and brutual crackdowns on protestors, President Crazy shouldn’t be allowed to travel to
Holocaust denial conferencesanti-racism conferences in Switzerland. We can also demand that our institutions (i.e. Columbia university) not invite President Crazy to give any more crazy fanatic talks when he comes to the UN next year.Illinidiva on June 22, 2009 at 3:24 PM
I think ipods for everyone would be in order.
Caper29 on June 22, 2009 at 3:27 PM
What are some DVD’s that Mr. Utopia can give to the Supreme Leader?
OhEssYouCowboys on June 22, 2009 at 3:31 PM
The Brits have sure had the Guts to speak up about what’s going on in Iran….unlike our “wouldn’t say shit if he had a mouthful”….. “president”.
Foxfire on June 22, 2009 at 3:32 PM
lobosan5 on June 22, 2009 at 3:18 PM
That was funny!
Little Boomer on June 22, 2009 at 3:34 PM
On the contrary, Dear Leader is sending ACORN over there to learn more about holding Iranian-style “elections”.
rbj on June 22, 2009 at 3:34 PM
FIFY
Daggett on June 22, 2009 at 3:40 PM
Brits pulling out of Iran?
Haven’t they received the Obama message of love, understanding and negotiations?
Ah, well. Just another reason for Barry to hate the UK.
tsj017 on June 22, 2009 at 3:43 PM
LOL… That should offend Dinner Jacket.
Illinidiva on June 22, 2009 at 3:44 PM
This is why I like you guys so much, Ed. You’re willing to take either side of the aisle to task when it’s necessary. Your post on Sotamayor’s supposed link to the sub-prime crisis is another example of that.
Keep it up.
nukemhill on June 22, 2009 at 3:45 PM
Barry’s just angry because he didn’t get to enjoy the decade of Hendrix, flower power, tie-dyed shirts and bell-bottoms. So he’s acting all 60s to try to bring those back.
Daggett on June 22, 2009 at 3:46 PM
Restrictions on imports of refined gasoline would be nice.
a capella on June 22, 2009 at 3:56 PM
Does this mean the State Departments plan to open a diplomatic mission in Iran is on hold until the situation stabilizes? What ever happened to that idea anyway? Did they go through with it?
Skandia Recluse on June 22, 2009 at 4:27 PM
it is a very snarky subtitled spoof from AndyCobbonUTube
“You have to wonder if Ahmadinejad has checked out Twitter, and if he went through the whole “what the hell do I need with a site that lets me tell the world what I had for lunch” sorta thing we all went through. …Ha-ha. What a dick.”
dougpowers.com just posted it….
http://dougpowers.com/2009/06/22/ahmadinejad-doesnt-want-to-be-guy-who-got-his-ass-kicked-by-twitter/
lobosan5 on June 22, 2009 at 4:40 PM
Barry should have known better than to send ACORN to supervise the election. He can get away with voter fraud here because of the illiteracy of out electorate, but trying it in Iran is a different story.
volsense on June 22, 2009 at 4:43 PM
here it is in a nutshell…..”It turns out, in Farsi “Twitter” means “ex-dictator.” “
lobosan5 on June 22, 2009 at 4:43 PM
& this:
http://twitter.com/madyar#/madyar
“Gov. threatening anyone who doesn’t show up to work tomorrow that they will be fired.” #Iranelectionabout 3 hours ago from web
“they are tortured prisoners to say that they supported from forigners” #iranelectionabout 4 hours ago from web
& from here: http://twitter.com/lotfan
“UNCONFIRMED: Mousavi and Karroubi to attend largest protests yet on Thursday , location to be announced later” #iranelection #gr88about 2 hours ago from TweetDeck
lobosan5 on June 22, 2009 at 4:51 PM
Comment pages: