US moves missile-defense assets to meet NoKo threat on Hawaii
posted at 12:14 pm on June 19, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
The Obama administration has decided that missile defense might come in handy after all. Following reports that Kim Jong-Il might launch a Taepodong-2 missile at Hawaii for a Fourth of July message to the White House, the Pentagon has ordered missile-defense systems bolstered around the 50th state. Those preparations include the deployment of a radar system that Obama strangely left in storage during the previous North Korean missile launch:
The U.S. is moving ground-to-air missile defenses to Hawaii as tensions escalate between Washington and Pyongyang over North Korea’s recent moves to restart its nuclear-weapon program and resume test-firing long-range missiles.
Defense Secretary Robert Gates said on Thursday that the U.S. is concerned that Pyongyang might soon fire a missile toward Hawaii. Some senior U.S. officials expect a North Korean test by midsummer, even though most don’t believe the missile would be capable of crossing the Pacific and reaching Hawaii.
Mr. Gates told reporters that the U.S. is positioning a sophisticated floating radar array in the ocean around Hawaii to track an incoming missile. The U.S. is also deploying missile-defense weapons to Hawaii that would theoretically be capable of shooting down a North Korean missile, should such an order be given, he said.
How odd that Obama suddenly discovered the utility of missile defense systems. Obama demanded a cut in missile-defense funding of $1.2 billion in 2010, which angered Republicans in Congress, who predicted this very scenario:
Lawmakers are demanding to know why the president’s proposed 2010 defense budget cuts missile defense by $1.2 billion and does not provide any funds for the European missile defense shield as Iran and North Korea defy the international community with missile testing. …
At Fort Greeley in Alaska, the missile defense silos can defend the U.S. from both North Korea and Iran, but the Obama budget would cuts the number of interceptor missiles based there from 44 to 30. And that has both Republicans and Democrats asking, why now?
“Is this being budget-driven?” Sen. Evan Bayh, D-Ind., asked.
“The numbers don’t add up to me,” said Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., “I think it’s just a question of somewhere somebody has decided to cut missile defense substantially, and you’re doing the best you can under a difficult circumstance.”
The last time Kim launched a T-2, in April of this year, the US had plenty of notice. However, Obama and the Pentagon neglected to pull its most sophisticated missile-defense radar out of Pearl Harbor in time to at least exercise it under real-world conditions. At that time, the White House didn’t want to “provoke” Kim by using our defense against the weapons with which Kim explicitly threatened us and our allies in April.
How did that strategy pay off? Ask the people of Hawaii when Kim lights the candle on the next T-2, and see if they would have preferred a test run for those missile-defense systems when we had the chance. We certainly now see why the US needs to keep funding those systems.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3
Insane, isn’t it?
The only way we’ll deserve it, is if we do nothing to stop it.
Rogue Traveler on June 19, 2009 at 1:39 PM
The important question is not whether the US missile defenses are able to take out an incoming Taepodong-2 missile, but whether The One (TM) will give the order for them to do so. Does he care enough about Hawai’i to spoil his GGA (Global Grovelling Apology) track record by damaging North Korea’s property? After all, the USA does have 56 other states.
Dowager Duchess on June 19, 2009 at 1:39 PM
Titanic II
csdeven on June 19, 2009 at 1:40 PM
I minored in Liberal… had to or I couldn’t understand any of my professors.
mankai on June 19, 2009 at 1:40 PM
Possibly so, but I wonder if Barry could win Hawaii as a conservative? His politics and his skin color, imo, make him a hometown favorite.
JiangxiDad on June 19, 2009 at 1:41 PM
Obama = chickenchit. And the world knows it.
Griz on June 19, 2009 at 1:42 PM
This is the Cuban Missile Crisis II with NK as Cuba, and China as Russia. I think this is between China and Obama–they don’t give a rat’s a** that Obama is a god and black.
JiangxiDad on June 19, 2009 at 1:43 PM
Saul Alinsky was mostly interested in destroying this country, thus his handbook offered little on foreign policy. Likewise, Frank Marshall Davis and Bill Ayers. Domestic destruction only.
a capella on June 19, 2009 at 1:44 PM
So please don`t paint me stupid but can anyone remember if the US has ever had a direct threat like this from a missile attack? I`m not talking suprise attack like Pearl harbor but any nation waving a missile and threatening us like this before? I can`t think of any quite this blatant.
LSUMama on June 19, 2009 at 1:44 PM
No chapters on incoming missiles.
faraway on June 19, 2009 at 1:45 PM
\
I’m trying to find the downside of North Korean Missiles landing in California and damned if I don’t see one.
highhopes on June 19, 2009 at 1:47 PM
For our California readers that did not see this on the other page:
Taepodong-2 range is 6200 miles (not 4500 miles as reported by the media).
faraway on June 19, 2009 at 1:48 PM
Obama will not order a shoot down.
A. He is weak
B. The U.S. doesn’t want to risk a miss and lose face
C. N. Korea wouldn’t gain anything from hitting Hawaii
D. Obama wants to keep the U.S. vulnerable to missile attack
scotash on June 19, 2009 at 1:49 PM
The Cuban Missile Crisis. It would have been this blatant if the Soviets had been able to get all the pieces into place before announcing to the world that they had nukes just of the Eastern seaboard of America.
highhopes on June 19, 2009 at 1:49 PM
If Kimmy launches and it misses without being shot down, which I assume it will, what then? Do they continue to go unpunished? If a bank robber is unsuccessful, do we conclude his failure is punishment enough? I don’t understand the failure to create a pain vs gain meter for these jerks, regardless of damage they inflict but for the effort itself.
a capella on June 19, 2009 at 1:50 PM
The Cuban missle crises was about as real as it gets. Those were scary…and I do mean scary….times.
Other then that there are the rumors about Soviet submarine K-129. Still an ‘Eyes Only’ topic.
Limerick on June 19, 2009 at 1:51 PM
Please. Hellllo? That “somebody, somewhere” was none other than candidate Barry Obama. He stated emphatically during the campaign that he wanted to reduce our nuclear capability, including reducing our missile defense. Didn’t Sessions see the video?
I voted no to Bam for this very reason. Like we need to be defenseless when every tinpot dictator is arming up to their eyeballs.
marybel on June 19, 2009 at 1:53 PM
This is one of those 3am moments and I am highly doubtful that the response from this White House will be timely. They will dither around and come up with words when something with intercontinental ballistic capability is actually required.
I remember a comment made in the aftermath of the 9/11/01 atrocities. The joke went along the lines that Gore’s first action on 9/11 would have been to call up the EPA and have them fine NYC for excessive pollution over Manhattan. That, of course, is slightly unfair but I was much happier with GWB calling the shots as we responded to the worst terrorist attack on US soil. Now we’ve got Obama in office and he will either be a pacifist unwilling to engage the enemy or he will try to overcompensate and get us embroiled in WWIII with the Chinese.
highhopes on June 19, 2009 at 1:56 PM
They can’t reach us. Hawaii is too far away.
We are not at war. They would never attack.
They would be crazy to attack us. Their little country will be annihilated.
Our defenses are too strong anyway. They could never hit us.
/ Pearl Harbor 12/6/1941
faraway on June 19, 2009 at 1:57 PM
Fund it? Naw, we have the Fly Swatter…
Wade on June 19, 2009 at 2:00 PM
Obviously, in a tribute to The One for remaking the country by his hand, the USS Constitution will be recommissioned as the HMS Progressive.
Affixed to the prow will be a glorious figurehead of The One’s First Lady, with strong, outstretched arms to part the even the roughest of seas.
The hull will be coated with a highly advanced material. In part, this will guard the vessel’s somewhat frail/aging construction from harsh conditions. More importantly, being an environmentally friendly ship of sail, it will allow the Progressive to easily tack with the changing winds and slip effortlessly through any resistance.
Possessing no weaponry, the vessel will be used largely for diplomatic missions, and will be outfitted with a special weatherized crow’s nest to allow for The One and his First Mate (TOTUS) to rise above and provide his eloquent voice to the enthralled masses.
Tragically, however, after much fanfare, the first voyage will be cut short as the ship will succumb to the weight of the vast confiscated treasure in it’s hold, bound for redistribution to those more deserving in far off lands, and slip beneath the warm embrace of the waves in the Persian Gulf.
little italy on June 19, 2009 at 2:00 PM
That’s the big question. What do you suppose American public reaction would be if such a launch occurs and the filthy liar in the White House decides the right course of action is to march into the UN Headquarters and demand a resolution condemning North Korea?
Conversely what does the filthy liar’s supporters do if he has the audacity to actually fire a shot at one of our enemies? This will be Obama’s war and it is one that he is mentally and ideologically unprepared to fight.
highhopes on June 19, 2009 at 2:00 PM
Wade on June 19, 2009 at 2:01 PM
The Cuban missle crises was about as real as it gets. Those were scary…and I do mean scary….times.
Other then that there are the rumors about Soviet submarine K-129. Still an ‘Eyes Only’ topic.
Limerick on June 19, 2009 at 1:51 PM
Thank you.I remember reading about the Bay of Pigs . Do you think it was more or less a threat than now? No I don`t honestly think Kim Jong would strike Hawaii . If your nation is turned to dust then who would you dictate to? But to me the scary thing is we seem to be getting it from all sides. Not to mention the biggest threat from our own Govt.
LSUMama on June 19, 2009 at 2:03 PM
USS House Fly
Wade on June 19, 2009 at 2:03 PM
Henceforth all ships named USS xxx will be considered an arrogant display of power. They will all be renamed UN xxx with xxx as names of heroes of the progressive movement.
faraway on June 19, 2009 at 2:05 PM
Please continue to mention it. The Enemy Within
Wade on June 19, 2009 at 2:07 PM
Taep’o-dong 2
Country: North Korea
Associated Country: People’s Republic of China
Alternate Name: Moksong 2, Pekdosan 2
Class: ICBM
Basing: Surface based
Length: 35.00 m
Diameter: 2.10 m
Launch Weight: 64000 kg
Payload: Single warhead
Warhead: 750 kg; Nuclear, biological, chemical, HE
Propulsion: 2-stage liquid, possible third
Range: 6000-9000 km (3728 – 5592miles)
Status: Development
In Service: Exp. 2007
http://www.missilethreat.com/missilesoftheworld/id.166/missile_detail.asp
Friendly21 on June 19, 2009 at 2:21 PM
Also see for ranges of various versions of the Taep’o-dong (scroll 1/2 way down):
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/dprk/td-2.htm
Friendly21 on June 19, 2009 at 2:25 PM
GlobalSecurity update
Gird Your Loins California
faraway on June 19, 2009 at 2:30 PM
In Hawaii it should be time to get nervous because Obama has said our interceptor missle doesn’t work and that’s why he’s cutting funding.
Herb on June 19, 2009 at 2:41 PM
Swift Boat?
Del Dolemonte on June 19, 2009 at 2:43 PM
My Dad was XO (for you Democrats, that’s “Executive Officer”, aka second in command) on a vessel in 1962. Their ship came that close to being sent to Cuba as part of the blockade. It was that scary, especially for a kid.
BTW my Dad’s CO would, some 42 years later, help to kneecap Jeanne-Claude Kerri, as one of the leading members of the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth.
Del Dolemonte on June 19, 2009 at 2:48 PM
I was about 30 years old and anyone with a lick of sense was scared to death. The US stood eye ball to eyeball with USSR to see who would back down before starting a nuclear war. Russia blinked first when their ships didn’t try to run the blockade of US Navy around Cuba. In all honesty I and all my co-workers really did fear becoming toast. It would have been Armageddon.
Herb on June 19, 2009 at 2:50 PM
Herb, what thoughts were going on in your head when the Russians were facing us off on the Georgian coast?
justincase on June 19, 2009 at 2:56 PM
Failboat.
RedMindBlueState on June 19, 2009 at 3:03 PM
I think it was in the news a week ago that one of our ship’s towed array was run over by a Chinese ship and put out of commission. I don’t know how easily those are replaced but is China running interference for NKorea? Will that missile defense platform have a USS Cole moment just as it is necessary to use it?
journeyintothewhirlwind on June 19, 2009 at 3:04 PM
Wonderful. Hawaii will get nuked (not this time, but sometime in the future) and we can all watch the re-runs on recorded radar TV. The CIA and NSA will be able to tell us how it happened, but not why it wasn’t prevented.
Our current anti-missile technology is great stuff, but it needs vast improvements. It’s just not all that reliable, which is why the military wants funds to improve the technology.
Anybody else notice the ‘theoretically’ weasel-word in there? That is a big ‘if’ if you are trying to guarantee safety from a missile strike.
We need to position a couple of missile frigates about 18 miles off the NK coast and shoot down anything flying faster than M2.
ElRonaldo on June 19, 2009 at 3:11 PM
As I said in another thread, test the missile defense system, but wether it succeeds or not the launch site should cease to exist. I know we can do that.
taznar on June 19, 2009 at 3:13 PM
journeyintothewhirlwind, I think the article about the USS McCain waiting to intercept the NK ship said that the two ships facing off now are the same ones that collided a week ago. Did I catch that right?
justincase on June 19, 2009 at 3:14 PM
Why does Kim hate us?!?!?!?!
Akzed on June 19, 2009 at 3:16 PM
It could be- I will have to see if I saved the article to one of my folders.
journeyintothewhirlwind on June 19, 2009 at 3:18 PM
http://www.ohio.com/news/world/48076267.
This article seemed to give the most detail about this encounter and other encounters with Chinese ships. And yes, it was the USS McCain.
Our ship was 144 miles off of the Phillipines when the encounter happened.
journeyintothewhirlwind on June 19, 2009 at 3:32 PM
Yes, we “heard” you the first time.
baldilocks on June 19, 2009 at 3:47 PM
I may steal that one.
mikeyboss on June 19, 2009 at 4:06 PM
(putting on tinfoil hat)
I think Obama wouldn’t be terribly bothered by a missile hitting Hawaii.
He wouldn’t have to worry about that darn birth certificate issue anymore if the only vault copy was vaporized.
/tinfoil hat
VibrioCocci on June 19, 2009 at 4:07 PM
All I can say is “H-3″. When I left Kailua in 1966 it was in the planning stages. Thanks to them, it took 30+ years to build.
Same thing happened here in New Hampshire. The tree-huggers here delayed the completion of Interstate 93 thru Franconia Notch because they were afraid it would make the State symbol, the Old Man of the Mountain, fall off Cannon Mountain.
But the Old Man fell down anyway, due to natural causes, namely the freeze-thaw cycle.
Ironically, I was visiting Hawaii when I got the news of the Old Man’s demise. Was riding on H-3 as a matter of fact.
Del Dolemonte on June 19, 2009 at 4:28 PM
This missle may take out the original birth certificate?
seven on June 19, 2009 at 4:30 PM
wiki sand-blasted and flushed down the memory hole a portion of its O’bama page last year-namely the part about how the elite prep school he attended, Punahou. enaged in the ancient Hawaiian practice known as “Kill Haole Day”, where on the last day of school, white kids had the getalife beaten out of them for the crime of being Caucasians.
I lived in the Islands about the same time Barry allegedly was born there, and went thru Kill Haole Day every year. Racial tolerance at its finest!
Del Dolemonte on June 19, 2009 at 4:35 PM
I’m not putting on the tinfoil hat again!
VibrioCocci on June 19, 2009 at 4:37 PM
Thank you President Reagan for not listening to the skeptics that talked about “star wars” and for relentlessly pursuing SDI and other anti-missle technology. Thank you Pres. Bush for continuing the development of anti-missle technology. Too bad that we now have a president that wants to kill this technology.
georgealbert on June 19, 2009 at 5:18 PM
Obama strikes me as tactically competent as a keystone cop.
Watch Obama pile everything in front of the Hawaiian islands (an area he has a personal stake in), and watch ol’ ill Kim fire the missile right at Alaska (a state Obama has no one in that he likes, chances are).
Virus-X on June 19, 2009 at 5:26 PM
This is outrageous! Where’s the apology?
Cybergeezer on June 19, 2009 at 5:46 PM
Actually, the news story is wrong (surprise).
The SBX in the picture (Sea-Based X-band Radar) was at Pearl Harbor during the last DPRK launch. It was undergoing refit at the time, and was not used. Pearl Harbor is also the home port for all the SM-3 antiballistic missile testing, they shoot targets from Kwajalein in the western Pacific and intercept them west of Kauai. It’s not so much deploying the ABM SWAT team as it is bringing them back from wherever they have been.
The SBX is apparently ready to roll this time, which means we’ll probably know why the DPRK’s missile failed before they do. It can reportedly identify a soccer ball on the west coast of the US…when parked on the east coast. Should anything approach, the Navy can take it out.
Also, and believe me I’m not defending the DPRK, the launch path for the most efficient use of energy heading to orbit from the latitude the NorKs are launching from passes southeast, toward the equator and therefore over Hawaii. The DPRK did not say they were lauching a missile at Hawaii, the news story is from a Japanese intelligence estimate. The Norks have not stated a launch date, or a target.
Tempest in a teapot, really. BHO will still probably screw it up.
DarkAdapted on June 19, 2009 at 6:59 PM
would the US military fail to act or take action if Barry wouldn’t give the a-ok to shoot down an incoming missle? If they knew we were actually at risk?
mimi1220 on June 19, 2009 at 8:40 PM
What’s the big deal? We would still have 56 states left.
Geochelone on June 19, 2009 at 9:29 PM
The Good Ship Lollypop.
Geochelone on June 19, 2009 at 9:31 PM
And it’s staffed by the MSM’s all day suckers.
Loxodonta on June 19, 2009 at 9:36 PM
I dont think they told Bambi they were doing it.
The less he knows the safer we are.
faol on June 19, 2009 at 9:42 PM
Odd indeed! Odder still, Hillary will be in surgery/recovery during this crisis. Oddest yet: People actually voted for a half-term senator with zero experience.
Betcha Bush, Cheney & Condi would have sent 4 ships to intercept NK’s missles.
TN Mom on June 19, 2009 at 9:49 PM
Ed, I find it odd none of our allies are stepping up to help us defend Hawaii. Are we alone in this fight? What is the usual protocol for our allies?
TN Mom on June 19, 2009 at 9:54 PM
The exact location of the radar, security codes and frequency the radar uses will be released at Bidens next Public event.
GunRunner on June 20, 2009 at 1:02 AM
FYI
During the Cuban Missile Crisis, the Soviets in Cuba were planning to take out Guantanamo Naval Base with an early version of a nuclear cruise missile, the FKR or frontovaya krylataya raketa. There were two regiments of these in Cuba at the time, each with forty nuclear warheads and eight cruise missile launchers. We were very lucky we did not invade. Raul Castro knows all about this because he was the guy that coordinated with the Soviets about the plan to destroy GITMO. What most people know about the Cuban Missile Crisis is wrong. Things got very close indeed, much closer that this North Korea missile thing.
gordo on June 20, 2009 at 1:15 AM
Gee thanks Mom. Since you are so sanctimonious, perhaps you should start your own blog, that way you can ban people who don’t conform to your speech. Or better yet, go into a profession where you can tell other people what to do, like a bureaucrat or even better, a lawyer! Oh wait…
GunRunner on June 20, 2009 at 1:16 AM
I saw this article earlier today. It amazes me how flowered-up it was, giving us all the impression that we moved massive amounts of missile defense systems to Hawaii. Nothing was “moved” to Hawaii to counter this threat. The SBX-T has been there for the last couple of months undergoing routine maintenance. It’s normal deployed location is near Adak, AK. If anything, they moved it a couple hundred miles out to sea in preparation for the launch. The “missile defense weapons” that Gates referred to is the THAAD (Terminal High Altitude Air Defense) missile system, which has aalways been at PMRF (Pacific Missile Range Facility), on the Southeastern shore of Kauai. Since all missile tests at PMRF are launched towards the East, they most likely rotated the THAAD radar 180 degrees to get coverage of anything launched out of the Far East.
RMCS_USN on June 20, 2009 at 1:19 AM
U.S.S. Obama will be a Target Drone.
Love how this “little country” just keeps upgrading his fireworks.
An interesting scenario would be if he or his mini-me shoots off a nuke, we intercept and it detonates. Any President with balls would take out every military complex Nk has and invade. Obama will never do that. His Presidency would last 30 days, if that. Once people realize that the god O-hole is incapable of Command America would look like Iran times 100.Americans may be fat and happy, but they react badly to a gun in the face.
GunRunner on June 20, 2009 at 1:40 AM
The three words in this that really seem to gnaw at my senses and make me take notice as to what could have been are:
Alaska
Budget
Why?
If only common sense played a roll in electing Obama to the presidence of the USA.
Miss Molly on June 20, 2009 at 2:15 AM
I would say prepare to shoot it down, but dont unless it is projected to breach a certain airspace. If you want to piss ‘em off though, shoot it down on ascent once it clears Japan. When they say ‘missle test’, they are testing US not the missle. Screw ‘em what are they gonna do about it. Jong Jong is nothing but a big fat crybaby with little toys anyway.
johnnyU on June 20, 2009 at 8:31 AM
They may want to be on alert elsewhere too. Suppose he doesn’t shoot it that way?
I’d really laugh if he screws up and lands it in China.LOL
johnnyU on June 20, 2009 at 8:38 AM
hmmm maybe we’ll test our gear too. Thanks Jong Jong for the target!!
johnnyU on June 20, 2009 at 8:40 AM
The legal trick is to determine where to shoot it down? If shot down over any country could be considered war.
Because, a counties sovereignty extends from the below the ground and up to heaven.
Therefore, we must shot it down over international waters. However, the further into the flight path the harder it gets to shot it down.
MSGTAS on June 20, 2009 at 9:50 AM
The photo of the equipment being towed across the ocean, showing the big white (radar?) ball, reminds me of the thing on “The Prisoner” that would come up from the ocean floor and swallow Patrick McGoohan whenever he tried to escape from The Village. That particular white ball was, I’ve read, based on the bubble in which the Good Witch floats into Oz.
While I’m reminscing, is anyone else here old enough to have had a fallout shelter during the Cuban Missle Crisis? We made one in our basement. We put some supplies, such as a few big cans of water, in an interior room down there. I’m sure it wouldn’t have helped us, but we felt very safe and patriotic for having worked on it. My dad, an army lt. colonel, was called up to Fort Chaffee, Arkansas, and I remember my mother showing me a map, because we were considering moving there with him. In the end, we stayed put, although he was gone for several months.
Just recallin’. Sorry it was a bit OT. Today, a basement shelter would have so much more stuff. I hope we won’t need one.
KyMouse on June 20, 2009 at 10:26 AM
“We certainly now see why the US needs to keep funding those systems.”
I see nothing of the kind. Hawaii only has 4 electoral votes. And the tourism industry is always the first hit in bad economic times so their lobby power is feasibly unsustainable.
Love, Your Congress for Defense Earmarks Sustainability Chairpersons
Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-MD)
Rep. John Murtha (D-PA)
FeFe on June 20, 2009 at 11:19 AM
Wouldn’t it be a beautiful and wonderful irony if Japan knocked down a North Korean missile flying through its airspace–all in defense of Hawaii some 68 years after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor?
Life is beautiful.
Pilgrimsarbour on June 20, 2009 at 11:49 PM
so they’re gonna fire a ping pong ball from an oil rig?
uptight on June 21, 2009 at 6:25 AM
25 years in the military, 9 years in Korea, and 12 in the Pacific and Middle East Theaters, all I have to offer is that I know the threats are real, the damage that can inflict is deadly, and they will use them without a second thought.
So beware and be prepared to defend our way of life, instead of trying to make nice and apologizing.
MSGTAS on June 21, 2009 at 10:16 AM
Perhaps the missile will fail. Perhaps the defense system will intercept it.
The epic failure here is that the US is cowering in the face of overt aggression from a bankrupt communist outpost (talking about N Korea).
In any normal situation the administration would be answering tough questions about their conduct, because citizens are now personally at risk at a result of their nuanced and weak foreign policy.
virgo on June 21, 2009 at 6:10 PM
Carter was the biggest idiot for a President, but Carter looks like Reagan compared to Obama. If Carter had his way we would have a United DPRK Korea. Carter wanted to remove all troops from South Korea. During a visit to South Korea in 1979 after a difficult meeting with President Park the US ambassador Bill Gleysteen and Secretary of State Cyrus R. Vance argued with Carter to change his mind. Holbrook said as the limo pulled up to the ambassadors residence no one got out. Holbrook could see inside the limo from his car behind that a heated argument was taking place. The up side is that Carter relented and slowed down the withdrawal. Reagan Stopped the withdrawal all together.
Obama election office had a US flag with Che Guevara on it. Che was 2nd in charge for Cuban revolution under Castro.
no one should be surprised that Obama is a communist.
Ed Laskie on June 22, 2009 at 6:35 AM
Kim Jon-Il has uttered an act of WAR if we America interfere with his nuke deliverys to terroristic dictatorships,how ironic.Why hasnt americas supreme leader-(obama) uttered we will annihilate you if you fire a missle at Americas HomeLand!America went from Strength Through Military Power To Weakness through Weakness over night!
Are there any real men left in our GOVT!How will America protect itself from the crazys in the world with a bunch of scissys running DOD?
Roadking85 on June 22, 2009 at 10:34 AM
Mankai et al…
There are a lot of us from Hawaii who did not vote for BHO. Your argument that we in Hawaii deserve the possibility of being bombed because a majority voted for him is absurd…A majority of our Country did the same. Do a people who vote a certain way deserve the consequence? Last I knew…it just takes 50% +1 to win an election…does that mean that the 50% – 1 deserve what they get? No, it just motivates them to vote differently the next time.
I served my Country and will do so again in a heartbeat! I am raising my kids to be respectful and patriotic citizens. I am a product of an immigrant mother and also a descendant of the Mayflower on my father’s side….
I pray you change your warped thinking…
jnrz on June 22, 2009 at 7:42 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3