<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sotomayor: My women-only club isn&#8217;t discriminatory but I&#8217;m quitting it anyway</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/19/sotomayor-my-women-only-club-isnt-discriminatory-but-im-quitting-it-anyway/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/19/sotomayor-my-women-only-club-isnt-discriminatory-but-im-quitting-it-anyway/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 02:27:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff from WI</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/19/sotomayor-my-women-only-club-isnt-discriminatory-but-im-quitting-it-anyway/comment-page-2/#comment-2335869</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff from WI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56716#comment-2335869</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;So what are the chances of a man who belonged to a “Mens Only” club being appointed to the supreme court? Liberals are such sexist, racist hypocrits!

TrickyDick on June 22, 2009 at 8:47 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

AMEN!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>So what are the chances of a man who belonged to a “Mens Only” club being appointed to the supreme court? Liberals are such sexist, racist hypocrits!</p>
<p>TrickyDick on June 22, 2009 at 8:47 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>AMEN!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrickyDick</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/19/sotomayor-my-women-only-club-isnt-discriminatory-but-im-quitting-it-anyway/comment-page-2/#comment-2335804</link>
		<dc:creator>TrickyDick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56716#comment-2335804</guid>
		<description>So what are the chances of a man who belonged to a &quot;Mens Only&quot; club being appointed to the supreme court?  Liberals are such sexist, racist hypocrits!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what are the chances of a man who belonged to a &#8220;Mens Only&#8221; club being appointed to the supreme court?  Liberals are such sexist, racist hypocrits!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff from WI</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/19/sotomayor-my-women-only-club-isnt-discriminatory-but-im-quitting-it-anyway/comment-page-2/#comment-2335698</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff from WI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56716#comment-2335698</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; Ugly dyke.

    LarryG on June 20, 2009 at 9:55 PM 

    Jeff from WI on June 21, 2009 at 8:24 AM

    Jeff from WI on June 21, 2009 at 8:27 AM

Glad to see you elevating the level of discourse. Going after a woman’s looks and/or sexual orientation- that’s really original.

MNExpatriate on June 21, 2009 at 6:54 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
 Well look over the HA site.For women we have pictured Megyn Kelly, cutie, the Iraqi martyr cutie, and even lefty third place but not terrible really, Capricia Marshall. Then there&#039;s Sotomayer. It&#039;s hard to even think of Soto as the same species.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> Ugly dyke.</p>
<p>    LarryG on June 20, 2009 at 9:55 PM </p>
<p>    Jeff from WI on June 21, 2009 at 8:24 AM</p>
<p>    Jeff from WI on June 21, 2009 at 8:27 AM</p>
<p>Glad to see you elevating the level of discourse. Going after a woman’s looks and/or sexual orientation- that’s really original.</p>
<p>MNExpatriate on June 21, 2009 at 6:54 PM</p></blockquote>
<p> Well look over the HA site.For women we have pictured Megyn Kelly, cutie, the Iraqi martyr cutie, and even lefty third place but not terrible really, Capricia Marshall. Then there&#8217;s Sotomayer. It&#8217;s hard to even think of Soto as the same species.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff from WI</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/19/sotomayor-my-women-only-club-isnt-discriminatory-but-im-quitting-it-anyway/comment-page-2/#comment-2335689</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff from WI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56716#comment-2335689</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Glad to see you elevating the level of discourse. Going after a woman’s looks and/or sexual orientation- that’s really original.

MNExpatriate on June 21, 2009 at 6:54 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well perhaps we should discuss how she brings &quot;diversity&quot; to the Supreme Court. No wait,since her job on the Supreme Court is NOT to write new law, but to follow the Constitution, there&#039;s really not much more to comment about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Glad to see you elevating the level of discourse. Going after a woman’s looks and/or sexual orientation- that’s really original.</p>
<p>MNExpatriate on June 21, 2009 at 6:54 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Well perhaps we should discuss how she brings &#8220;diversity&#8221; to the Supreme Court. No wait,since her job on the Supreme Court is NOT to write new law, but to follow the Constitution, there&#8217;s really not much more to comment about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FeFe</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/19/sotomayor-my-women-only-club-isnt-discriminatory-but-im-quitting-it-anyway/comment-page-2/#comment-2334486</link>
		<dc:creator>FeFe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 23:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56716#comment-2334486</guid>
		<description>It isn&#039;t belonging to a group of like mined people but the purpose behind it. Have a look at those members in the Obama administration -- White House Council on Women and Girls, March 2009. Padding their resumes so they can get a public/private job when they leave the White House. Brilliant maneuvers. Paid to lobby, run govt. funds, or take taxpayer dollars:

http://thenewagenda.net/2009/06/18/shining-a-light-without-illuminating/

Tina Brown covered this in her article for the Daily Beast (14/06/09) — “what real female power looks like.” Networking. And don&#039;t forget that some women in power are more equal than others:

http://www.conservatives4palin.com/2009/06/sweet-tina-brown-has-some-advice-for.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It isn&#8217;t belonging to a group of like mined people but the purpose behind it. Have a look at those members in the Obama administration &#8212; White House Council on Women and Girls, March 2009. Padding their resumes so they can get a public/private job when they leave the White House. Brilliant maneuvers. Paid to lobby, run govt. funds, or take taxpayer dollars:</p>
<p><a href="http://thenewagenda.net/2009/06/18/shining-a-light-without-illuminating/" rel="nofollow">http://thenewagenda.net/2009/06/18/shining-a-light-without-illuminating/</a></p>
<p>Tina Brown covered this in her article for the Daily Beast (14/06/09) — “what real female power looks like.” Networking. And don&#8217;t forget that some women in power are more equal than others:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.conservatives4palin.com/2009/06/sweet-tina-brown-has-some-advice-for.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.conservatives4palin.com/2009/06/sweet-tina-brown-has-some-advice-for.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MNExpatriate</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/19/sotomayor-my-women-only-club-isnt-discriminatory-but-im-quitting-it-anyway/comment-page-2/#comment-2334339</link>
		<dc:creator>MNExpatriate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 22:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56716#comment-2334339</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
Ugly dyke.

LarryG on June 20, 2009 at 9:55 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;Jeff from WI on June 21, 2009 at 8:24 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;Jeff from WI on June 21, 2009 at 8:27 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Glad to see you elevating the level of discourse.  Going after a woman&#039;s looks and/or sexual orientation- that&#039;s really original.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Ugly dyke.</p>
<p>LarryG on June 20, 2009 at 9:55 PM
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Jeff from WI on June 21, 2009 at 8:24 AM</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Jeff from WI on June 21, 2009 at 8:27 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Glad to see you elevating the level of discourse.  Going after a woman&#8217;s looks and/or sexual orientation- that&#8217;s really original.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MidWestFarmer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/19/sotomayor-my-women-only-club-isnt-discriminatory-but-im-quitting-it-anyway/comment-page-2/#comment-2333636</link>
		<dc:creator>MidWestFarmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 16:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56716#comment-2333636</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have a problem with her belonging to a &quot;women only club&quot;.  I think people get too bent out of shape over those things.  However - I think Sotomoyor&#039;s views on gender and race are reflected in her choice of groups to belong to and her statements about how her racial/gender background are superior to &quot;old white men&quot;.  That view point is flies in the face of what I believe a supreme court judge&#039;s views should be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have a problem with her belonging to a &#8220;women only club&#8221;.  I think people get too bent out of shape over those things.  However &#8211; I think Sotomoyor&#8217;s views on gender and race are reflected in her choice of groups to belong to and her statements about how her racial/gender background are superior to &#8220;old white men&#8221;.  That view point is flies in the face of what I believe a supreme court judge&#8217;s views should be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: imperator</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/19/sotomayor-my-women-only-club-isnt-discriminatory-but-im-quitting-it-anyway/comment-page-2/#comment-2333440</link>
		<dc:creator>imperator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 15:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56716#comment-2333440</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Doesn’t anyone question why this is a story when for decades the media has pretended like Bohemian Grove doesn’t exist and that anyone who acknowledges its existence is crazy? Now a few lesbians get together for a private drum circle and it’s some sort of scandal? &lt;/blockquote&gt;

They did? I suggest a re-reading of the Alito confirmation transcripts. The vilification is as usual one sided, here? its ho hum, for Alito, not quite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Doesn’t anyone question why this is a story when for decades the media has pretended like Bohemian Grove doesn’t exist and that anyone who acknowledges its existence is crazy? Now a few lesbians get together for a private drum circle and it’s some sort of scandal? </p></blockquote>
<p>They did? I suggest a re-reading of the Alito confirmation transcripts. The vilification is as usual one sided, here? its ho hum, for Alito, not quite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff from WI</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/19/sotomayor-my-women-only-club-isnt-discriminatory-but-im-quitting-it-anyway/comment-page-2/#comment-2333186</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff from WI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 12:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56716#comment-2333186</guid>
		<description>Supreme Court will now feature it&#039;s two women. The wicked Witch Of The West, and Soto, the Latina Lady Circus Freak.
Proof LIBERAL WOMEN should be required to wear bags over their heads in public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Supreme Court will now feature it&#8217;s two women. The wicked Witch Of The West, and Soto, the Latina Lady Circus Freak.<br />
Proof LIBERAL WOMEN should be required to wear bags over their heads in public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff from WI</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/19/sotomayor-my-women-only-club-isnt-discriminatory-but-im-quitting-it-anyway/comment-page-2/#comment-2333178</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff from WI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 12:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56716#comment-2333178</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s with her face, so many areas that look swollen. Are they face fat? Perhaps face lipo would help. I&#039;d call her a dog but I love dogs and would never insult them like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s with her face, so many areas that look swollen. Are they face fat? Perhaps face lipo would help. I&#8217;d call her a dog but I love dogs and would never insult them like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LarryG</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/19/sotomayor-my-women-only-club-isnt-discriminatory-but-im-quitting-it-anyway/comment-page-2/#comment-2332289</link>
		<dc:creator>LarryG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 01:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56716#comment-2332289</guid>
		<description>Ugly dyke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugly dyke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/19/sotomayor-my-women-only-club-isnt-discriminatory-but-im-quitting-it-anyway/comment-page-2/#comment-2331827</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 00:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56716#comment-2331827</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;And if it isn’t OK then 90% of the Congress and Senate needs to step down.

universalagent on June 20, 2009 at 7:34 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;m OK with that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And if it isn’t OK then 90% of the Congress and Senate needs to step down.</p>
<p>universalagent on June 20, 2009 at 7:34 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m OK with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: universalagent</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/19/sotomayor-my-women-only-club-isnt-discriminatory-but-im-quitting-it-anyway/comment-page-2/#comment-2331658</link>
		<dc:creator>universalagent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 23:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56716#comment-2331658</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t anyone question why this is a story when for decades the media has pretended like Bohemian Grove doesn&#039;t exist and that anyone who acknowledges its existence is crazy? Now a few lesbians get together for a private drum circle and it&#039;s some sort of scandal? If it&#039;s A-OK for male politicians to get together with each other in private meetings and conduct secret rituals and pledge to give preferential treatment to each other and plot to control the reins of government and engineer society then why isn&#039;t it OK for women to do it? And if it isn&#039;t OK then 90% of the Congress and Senate needs to step down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t anyone question why this is a story when for decades the media has pretended like Bohemian Grove doesn&#8217;t exist and that anyone who acknowledges its existence is crazy? Now a few lesbians get together for a private drum circle and it&#8217;s some sort of scandal? If it&#8217;s A-OK for male politicians to get together with each other in private meetings and conduct secret rituals and pledge to give preferential treatment to each other and plot to control the reins of government and engineer society then why isn&#8217;t it OK for women to do it? And if it isn&#8217;t OK then 90% of the Congress and Senate needs to step down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: imperator</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/19/sotomayor-my-women-only-club-isnt-discriminatory-but-im-quitting-it-anyway/comment-page-2/#comment-2330998</link>
		<dc:creator>imperator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 20:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56716#comment-2330998</guid>
		<description>The question is; are we getting the best available? This is a lifetime position to the highest court. One would think that logic would prevail over identity politics and affirmative action candidates [whom] needed grade help, twice,  and actually got the chances she had because of her nationality. She doesn’t appear any worse really but nor does she stand out, at all. She does however hold significant baggage in that she appears totally wrapped up in identity politics and in the end, has the temerity to ascribe bias to institutions that in fact got her where she is, she reminds me of an old sourpuss whom has a free ham under an arm and complains she has no bag to put it in. can we trust her to be fair? Not in my opinion. We need the best and balanced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is; are we getting the best available? This is a lifetime position to the highest court. One would think that logic would prevail over identity politics and affirmative action candidates [whom] needed grade help, twice,  and actually got the chances she had because of her nationality. She doesn’t appear any worse really but nor does she stand out, at all. She does however hold significant baggage in that she appears totally wrapped up in identity politics and in the end, has the temerity to ascribe bias to institutions that in fact got her where she is, she reminds me of an old sourpuss whom has a free ham under an arm and complains she has no bag to put it in. can we trust her to be fair? Not in my opinion. We need the best and balanced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/19/sotomayor-my-women-only-club-isnt-discriminatory-but-im-quitting-it-anyway/comment-page-2/#comment-2330633</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56716#comment-2330633</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;She needs the comfort after all the guys who kept calling her 3 times for dates…bwaaaaaaaaa!

sabbott on June 20, 2009 at 8:25 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You know why they really stopped calling after that? Guys only have pig parties every once in a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>She needs the comfort after all the guys who kept calling her 3 times for dates…bwaaaaaaaaa!</p>
<p>sabbott on June 20, 2009 at 8:25 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>You know why they really stopped calling after that? Guys only have pig parties every once in a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhymes With Right</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/19/sotomayor-my-women-only-club-isnt-discriminatory-but-im-quitting-it-anyway/comment-page-2/#comment-2330311</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhymes With Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 16:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56716#comment-2330311</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Sotomayor Implictly Admits I&#039;m Right...&lt;/strong&gt;

Of course, Obama&#039;s Supreme Court nominee denies it even as she scrambles to back away from her unethical behavior. Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor resigned Friday from an elite all-women&#039;s club after Republicans questioned her participation in ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Sotomayor Implictly Admits I&#8217;m Right&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Of course, Obama&#8217;s Supreme Court nominee denies it even as she scrambles to back away from her unethical behavior. Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor resigned Friday from an elite all-women&#8217;s club after Republicans questioned her participation in &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cicero43</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/19/sotomayor-my-women-only-club-isnt-discriminatory-but-im-quitting-it-anyway/comment-page-1/#comment-2330245</link>
		<dc:creator>Cicero43</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 16:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56716#comment-2330245</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;But she said she didn’t want questions about it to “distract anyone from my qualifications and record.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

With the mediocre quality of her qualifications and work, she should be happy to have the distraction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But she said she didn’t want questions about it to “distract anyone from my qualifications and record.”</p></blockquote>
<p>With the mediocre quality of her qualifications and work, she should be happy to have the distraction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UNREPENTANT CONSERVATIVE CAPITOLIST</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/19/sotomayor-my-women-only-club-isnt-discriminatory-but-im-quitting-it-anyway/comment-page-1/#comment-2330223</link>
		<dc:creator>UNREPENTANT CONSERVATIVE CAPITOLIST</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56716#comment-2330223</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Hillary has a movie?

faol on June 19, 2009 at 9:52 PM

&lt;/blockquote&gt;
you cannot use Hillary and hot in the same paragraph, unless its used as &quot;hot flashes&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Hillary has a movie?</p>
<p>faol on June 19, 2009 at 9:52 PM</p>
</blockquote>
<p>you cannot use Hillary and hot in the same paragraph, unless its used as &#8220;hot flashes&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Belong To The Club, And They&#8217;ll Have Someone Like You As A Member &#171; Around The Sphere</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/19/sotomayor-my-women-only-club-isnt-discriminatory-but-im-quitting-it-anyway/comment-page-1/#comment-2330204</link>
		<dc:creator>Belong To The Club, And They&#8217;ll Have Someone Like You As A Member &#171; Around The Sphere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56716#comment-2330204</guid>
		<description>[...] Allah Pundit: I get that the uproar over this is a reprisal for the left wetting itself over Alito belonging to a men-only club, but isn’t this kind of … stupid? The hallmark of true discrimination is the shared sentiment that those who don’t belong to the empowered group are somehow inferior. Is that really what’s going on with (most) clubs that are restrictive by gender? It’s not a superiority/inferiority thing, it’s a gender-differences-are-relevant-to-comfort-levels thing. And before anyone yells at me, bear in mind that even our Equal Protection jurisprudence observes that distinction: Racially discriminatory laws are analyzed with “strict scrutiny, meaning that they’re (almost) always unconstitutional, whereas laws that discriminate by gender are analyzed with “intermediate scrutiny,” meaning they need to have a good reason to discriminate for a court to uphold them. Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)BEWARE! Sooner OR Later … YOU Will BE Part OF US!HotBuys [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Allah Pundit: I get that the uproar over this is a reprisal for the left wetting itself over Alito belonging to a men-only club, but isn’t this kind of … stupid? The hallmark of true discrimination is the shared sentiment that those who don’t belong to the empowered group are somehow inferior. Is that really what’s going on with (most) clubs that are restrictive by gender? It’s not a superiority/inferiority thing, it’s a gender-differences-are-relevant-to-comfort-levels thing. And before anyone yells at me, bear in mind that even our Equal Protection jurisprudence observes that distinction: Racially discriminatory laws are analyzed with “strict scrutiny, meaning that they’re (almost) always unconstitutional, whereas laws that discriminate by gender are analyzed with “intermediate scrutiny,” meaning they need to have a good reason to discriminate for a court to uphold them. Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)BEWARE! Sooner OR Later … YOU Will BE Part OF US!HotBuys [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ladyingray</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/19/sotomayor-my-women-only-club-isnt-discriminatory-but-im-quitting-it-anyway/comment-page-1/#comment-2330171</link>
		<dc:creator>ladyingray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56716#comment-2330171</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;georgealbert on June 20, 2009 at 11:29 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If I understand the point of the article, she quit so that it wouldn&#039;t be a distraction for her confirmation hearings...the way the Dems were distrated by Alito&#039;s club membership. I do believe the libs &quot;started this&quot; at that time.

Personally, I don&#039;t give a rip who belongs to what club...sometimes men want to talk to other men, sometimes women want to talk to women, without the distraction or interruption of the opposite gender. 

I&#039;m not the most confident person in the world, but I certainly am not threatened by the thought that there is a male-only club out there that I can&#039;t join simply because I&#039;m a female.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>georgealbert on June 20, 2009 at 11:29 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>If I understand the point of the article, she quit so that it wouldn&#8217;t be a distraction for her confirmation hearings&#8230;the way the Dems were distrated by Alito&#8217;s club membership. I do believe the libs &#8220;started this&#8221; at that time.</p>
<p>Personally, I don&#8217;t give a rip who belongs to what club&#8230;sometimes men want to talk to other men, sometimes women want to talk to women, without the distraction or interruption of the opposite gender. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not the most confident person in the world, but I certainly am not threatened by the thought that there is a male-only club out there that I can&#8217;t join simply because I&#8217;m a female.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgealbert</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/19/sotomayor-my-women-only-club-isnt-discriminatory-but-im-quitting-it-anyway/comment-page-1/#comment-2330148</link>
		<dc:creator>georgealbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56716#comment-2330148</guid>
		<description>OK, I think y&#039;all are way off base here.  First, in case you missed it, men and women are different.  It&#039;s a male-female species thing.  Are we really getting to the point that if a man belongs to an all men&#039;s golf club that he should be disqualified for public office?  If women have a social or political club that discusses female issues, should they now be disqualified.  How about someone that goes to a Christian church that only allows Christians to attend and participate?  Should that person now be exculded from public office?   Gheesh...I am not a supporter of Sotomayor for Justice, but, come&#039;on, complaining about this is becoming like the progressives and libs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I think y&#8217;all are way off base here.  First, in case you missed it, men and women are different.  It&#8217;s a male-female species thing.  Are we really getting to the point that if a man belongs to an all men&#8217;s golf club that he should be disqualified for public office?  If women have a social or political club that discusses female issues, should they now be disqualified.  How about someone that goes to a Christian church that only allows Christians to attend and participate?  Should that person now be exculded from public office?   Gheesh&#8230;I am not a supporter of Sotomayor for Justice, but, come&#8217;on, complaining about this is becoming like the progressives and libs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ladyingray</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/19/sotomayor-my-women-only-club-isnt-discriminatory-but-im-quitting-it-anyway/comment-page-1/#comment-2330140</link>
		<dc:creator>ladyingray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56716#comment-2330140</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;dogsoldier on June 20, 2009 at 10:44 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

All true...and we&#039;re stuck with her on SCOTUS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>dogsoldier on June 20, 2009 at 10:44 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>All true&#8230;and we&#8217;re stuck with her on SCOTUS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dogsoldier</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/19/sotomayor-my-women-only-club-isnt-discriminatory-but-im-quitting-it-anyway/comment-page-1/#comment-2330007</link>
		<dc:creator>dogsoldier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 14:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56716#comment-2330007</guid>
		<description>The club abides by the rules of freedom of association, so I don&#039;t have an issue with it. She didn&#039;t need to resign the club. 

She&#039;s extremely unqualified for a host of other reasons.

She&#039;s incompetent.
She&#039;s a socialist.
She&#039;s a bigot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The club abides by the rules of freedom of association, so I don&#8217;t have an issue with it. She didn&#8217;t need to resign the club. </p>
<p>She&#8217;s extremely unqualified for a host of other reasons.</p>
<p>She&#8217;s incompetent.<br />
She&#8217;s a socialist.<br />
She&#8217;s a bigot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Physics Geek</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/19/sotomayor-my-women-only-club-isnt-discriminatory-but-im-quitting-it-anyway/comment-page-1/#comment-2329971</link>
		<dc:creator>Physics Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 14:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56716#comment-2329971</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;does anyone really have a problem with Sotomayor belonging to this dopey elitist group?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I thought it was bovine excrement in Alito&#039;s case and I think the same thing here. I don&#039;t care that they belong to a boy&#039;s/girl&#039;s club. It&#039;s a freaking non-issue except for the hysterical bedwetting demagogues on the left.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>does anyone really have a problem with Sotomayor belonging to this dopey elitist group?</p></blockquote>
<p>I thought it was bovine excrement in Alito&#8217;s case and I think the same thing here. I don&#8217;t care that they belong to a boy&#8217;s/girl&#8217;s club. It&#8217;s a freaking non-issue except for the hysterical bedwetting demagogues on the left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pabarge</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/19/sotomayor-my-women-only-club-isnt-discriminatory-but-im-quitting-it-anyway/comment-page-1/#comment-2329964</link>
		<dc:creator>pabarge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 14:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56716#comment-2329964</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s called a culture war. 

If you&#039;re not up for the fight, please spend your time in a dark room away from a keyboard.


Oh wait. Except for the keyboard, that&#039;s what you&#039;re doing isn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s called a culture war. </p>
<p>If you&#8217;re not up for the fight, please spend your time in a dark room away from a keyboard.</p>
<p>Oh wait. Except for the keyboard, that&#8217;s what you&#8217;re doing isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
