Brits loudly object to Khamenei calling them “evil” — Obama shrugs
posted at 2:24 pm on June 19, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
The British government has demanded an appearance of the Iranian ambassador in London after Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei referred to them as “evil”. The British, who have diplomatic and trade relations with Iran, took offense to the speech, and demanded an apology. Instead, they chewed out a junior-level staffer:
Britain’s Foreign Office said Friday it had told an Iranian diplomat it was concerned by supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s criticism of Britain, which he called evil.
During Friday prayers at Tehran University, Khamenei accused the United States, Britain and what he called Iran’s other enemies of fomenting unrest. He singled out Britain for specific criticism.
“I will tell you the outstanding diplomats of some Western countries who talk to us with diplomatic courtesy up to now during the past few days have taken their masquerade away from their faces and they are showing their true image,” he said according to a translation provided by the BBC. “They are displaying their enmity against the Islamic state, and the most evil of them is the British government.” …
The Foreign Office summoned the Iranian ambassador for talks, but said that, in the end, a more junior diplomat — the charge d’affaires, Safar Ali Eslamian Koupaei — attended a meeting with political director Mark Lyall Grant.
The Foreign Office said it was told the charge d’affaires was attending in the absence of the ambassador.
“We made clear to the Iranian charge that the supreme leader’s comments were unacceptable and had no basis in fact,” a Foreign Office spokesman said on condition of anonymity in line with policy.
Perhaps buoyed by Khamenei’s statement that the British were more evil than the Great Satan, Obama insisted that he would not react to Khamenei’s speech or express any support for the demonstrators in Iran:
Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s Friday warning to protestors to stop their demonstrations in the streets — a speech where he warned opposition leaders they would be “responsible for bloodshed and chaos” — will not change President Obama’s policy of avoiding expressing strong partisan support for the demonstrators, senior administration officials said Friday.
The president is pursuing a “foreign policy that advances our interests rather than a foreign policy that makes us feel good about what we’re saying,” a senior official said, just hours after the House of Representatives passed a resolution by overwhelming margins expressing support for “all Iranian citizens who embrace the values of freedom, human rights, civil liberties and rule of law,” affirming “the importance of democratic and fair elections,” and condemning “ongoing violence” by demonstrators.
Er, right. The big problem in Iran, according to the White House, is the “ongoing violence” by the demonstrators. Update: Jake Tapper apologizes for the typo in this paragraph — it should have been “against demonstrators,” not “by demonstrators.” It was also describing the Congressional resolution, as noted in the paragraph, which was my mistake.
Mike Pence took a big shot at Obama’s lack of response:
“When Ronald Reagan went before the Brandenburg Gate, he did not say ‘Mr. Gorbachev, that wall is none of our business,’” said Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind.
France, Germany, and now Britain — all trading partners with Iran — have managed to stand on the side of demonstrators attempting to peacefully end their oppression. Where is America, the beacon of liberty, at this moment? Attempting to build credibility with the oppressors. Shameful.
Update: See typo note above, with apologies from Jake Tapper over the confusion. Still, this is nothing more than a shrug.








Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
Is anyone else reminded that Obama was deeply offended by Bush declaring Iran, Iraq and North Korea “evil”, but that he doesn’t seem the least bit put out that the Iranian mulluhs view Britain as evil.
I think he basically agrees with them.
Jaibones on June 19, 2009 at 3:15 PM
After you receive the crude missile, you can blow your oil profits out your arse all the way to paradise
CMonster on June 19, 2009 at 3:15 PM
Obama thinks Evil is the guy who kills an abortion doctor
jp on June 19, 2009 at 3:18 PM
This is shameful.
If this makes sense to anyone, Obama’s failure to speak for freedom fills me with untainted digust. No partisan leanings here, this is just wrong.
Left, Right — what diaglogue are we left with if basic freedom is not the central value for both wings? At least it got lip service up to now.
Even if the Iranian people have not figured out that their system is flawed, they are demanding the things that will bring them peace and prosperity.
H
Hochmeister on June 19, 2009 at 3:19 PM
Obama on Iran: PRESENT
Bicyea on June 19, 2009 at 3:19 PM
Fixed.
BPD on June 19, 2009 at 3:21 PM
Britain kisses Muslim tush every opportunity it can on the homefront, and this is the thanks they get! Guess they gotta kiss it with more alacrity.
XOXOXO!
Akzed on June 19, 2009 at 3:22 PM
“Gird your Loins”
Joe Biden is Nostradamus.
portlandon on June 19, 2009 at 3:22 PM
Well, uhhh, I think, uh that, uh…evil is…a…rrrrrelative, uh, concept…and if we’re to…uh…
MadisonConservative on June 19, 2009 at 3:22 PM
There’s a new Sheriff in Town Iran, and he’s the Wimpiest Gun In The West.” Starring Barrack “Don Knots” Obama.
Jeff from WI on June 19, 2009 at 3:24 PM
Akzed on June 19, 2009 at 3:25 PM
meanwhile, in Chicago a group of Muslims are holding a conference on “The Fall of Capitalism and Rise of Islam”
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2009/06/islam-in-america-fall-of-capitalism-and-rise-of-islam.html
jp on June 19, 2009 at 3:25 PM
I think Obama admires how the ayatollah said he was “investigating” the situation so he could wait a few days, have some protestors killed, and then say the election was fine. I think Obama’s taking notes for 2012.
cheesebiz on June 19, 2009 at 3:25 PM
btw, to the postmodern mind, this is why we can’t call Iran Evil…”How would we feel if they call us evil?”
jp on June 19, 2009 at 3:26 PM
What, the Iranians can’t pronounce perfidious? David Cameron made noises about supporting the demonstrators today. It’s just that our current government has so little legitimacy that no-one even can be bothered about the leader of the Opposition contradicting our oily zit Foreign Secretary and making up his own foreign policy. Actually, even I don’t care what the Brits think about anything….
Fortunata on June 19, 2009 at 3:27 PM
I thought they was part of the “Axis of Eeeevviiiilll.” Oh that was Bush, the testator of Obooba’s oft-lamented inheritance.
Akzed on June 19, 2009 at 3:29 PM
What in the…? Someone test the water in Chicago…there is wayyy too much crazy in that place. Weird.
Mommypundit on June 19, 2009 at 3:29 PM
I’m not at all surprised. Obama (The Lord of the Flies) is connected to Frances Fox Piven, who helped define a strategy of orchestrating a crisis to kill capitalism and bring about “change” by bankrupting the country.
Daggett on June 19, 2009 at 3:31 PM
muslims never speak out against other muslims to the west. obama is just being a good muslim.
Locrian on June 19, 2009 at 3:33 PM
Obama’s evil plan is working already.
Mr_Magoo on June 19, 2009 at 3:33 PM
the groups website
http://www.islamicinvitationcentre.com/FAQ/Economic/FAQ_Economic.html
later on…
They too, want to “Spread the Wealth Around”
jp on June 19, 2009 at 3:34 PM
Again, He Who Must Be Obeyed will not offend the Muslim leaders in Tehran by siding with the opposition. It’s not a matter of weakness or simple incompetence, it’s a figurative “bow” to them.
n0doz on June 19, 2009 at 3:35 PM
Very soon after we waltz into the WH, cries for freedom will ring out all over the world, even in Iran, and the President of the greatest country on God’s green earth will…
shrug
Now it will seem like he’s doing the wrong thing, and that’s when he will need your support…
Mr_Magoo on June 19, 2009 at 3:36 PM
Friday night in Tehran….Reuters is reporting that rooftops are again the scene of crowds shouting ‘Death to the Dictator’. It seems the Supreme Leader has a decision to make as the protests are continuing.
Elsewhere in the world, some people are preparing for date night.
Limerick on June 19, 2009 at 3:36 PM
Hope on June 19, 2009 at 3:38 PM
This isn’t/should’t be a real shocker to us…but it doesn’t make it less frightening to know that we have…wow (it hit me again)…we have someone who fancies himself another Castro or Chaves…or worse. It’s pretty astounding what has happened. I keep saying, THIS IS WHY HE ISN’T SAYING ANYTHING. HE DOES. NOT. CARE.
Mommypundit on June 19, 2009 at 3:40 PM
look at the way that statement is worded.
The official policy of the Obama administration is ‘we will not express support’ for the demonstrators.
Obama will not take decisive action in any situation. It is not his style. He will hide until someone else takes a stand. Then Obama will try to take credit for setting it all up.
Skandia Recluse on June 19, 2009 at 3:41 PM
Let me ask you this, what would a statement of support for the protesters look like? What would you like him to say?
Tom_Shipley on June 19, 2009 at 3:43 PM
Ok, off to the salt mines for me.
See all you worrywarts at the witching hour +1.
Limerick on June 19, 2009 at 3:44 PM
I immediately thought the same thing myself. Even though your post is witty, it does sound like a sickening, yet
truthful prediction.
betsyz on June 19, 2009 at 3:46 PM
Above our pay grade. Refer to POTUS.
JiangxiDad on June 19, 2009 at 3:47 PM
Stick finger in wind. Real leadership!
JiangxiDad on June 19, 2009 at 3:48 PM
JiangxiDad on June 19, 2009 at 3:47 PM
I’m serious. You guys are harshly criticizing him for what he’s not saying. What exactly should be be saying in your view?
Tom_Shipley on June 19, 2009 at 3:48 PM
The Socialist Revolutionaries are focusing inward at this point in time not outward.
They don’t feel they’ll be effective until they get the American people in line first. International politics will be easy later on, because we’ll be harmless Socialists and most everybody out there will love us.
Oh, and by Socialist Revolutionaries I mean the White House and the bulk of Congress.
Dr. ZhivBlago on June 19, 2009 at 3:49 PM
I’m serious too. If he doesn’t get it right, he deserves the failure. And it looks like an epic one :)
JiangxiDad on June 19, 2009 at 3:56 PM
Clearly you have not been paying attention. At the very least your Dear Leader should have said something like this many days ago now:
“I am not sure myself whether or not the elections in Iran were rigged, but it seems clear that a majority of the Iranian people, who are in a much better position to know, think that it was, and in the extreme. It saddens me deeply that the regime there is, in effect, making war on the Iranian people. I had hoped that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was at core a decent man who could be reasoned with, but sadly it appears that I was mistaken”.
Of course, Obama is not exactly a big friend of liberty and individual rights for Americans, so why should he be for Iranians.
MB4 on June 19, 2009 at 3:58 PM
You don’t know? You have no fundamental principle on which to base a statement?
It should be easy.
The United States has always stood for and celebrated individual freedom; freedom of expression, freedom to live your life without interference from your government, or your neighbors. In the United States, good government has always meant limited government. Limited to that amount of government that maintains a peaceful society where all men and women are treated equally before the law.
Obama can not say any of that, and does not believe any of it, and apparently, Mr Shipley, neither do you.
Skandia Recluse on June 19, 2009 at 3:59 PM
I suspect Tom will now try to make your statements the object of scrutiny, instead of Obama’s. We’ll see.
JiangxiDad on June 19, 2009 at 4:02 PM
All sorts of people, here and elsewhere, have made all sorts of suggestions, and for many days now, so just keep your eyes open.
MB4 on June 19, 2009 at 4:02 PM
I think that he should condemn the sham election in no uncertain terms, and make clear his support for the Iranian people who are protesting that sham election.
Tonus on June 19, 2009 at 4:04 PM
He has said this.
Really? These protesters represent a majority of the Iranian people?
He has said that the violence carried about by the government on the protesters is deeply troubling, and that their voice should be heard without the threat of violence.
This is basically the only sentiment he has not expressed. I’m not exactly sure what practical, tangible good a direct criticism of Ahmadinejad would do right now.
If you can’t come up with a better alternative — or at least ANY alternative — what reason would people have to take your criticism seriously?
Tom_Shipley on June 19, 2009 at 4:05 PM
The fact of the matter is, we don’t KNOW that this was a sham of an election. As Obama said, the U.S. nor the international community did not have monitors in the country.
Tom_Shipley on June 19, 2009 at 4:07 PM
Contradictory. A suggested statement is offered, you reject it then claim that no alternative was offered. Then claim had any alternative been suggested, it would have been worthy of consideration.
Doublethink of the finest quality. You, Mr Shipley probably don’t even recognize it yourself. You are probably unable to recognize it which is another criterion that defines doublethink.
Skandia Recluse on June 19, 2009 at 4:10 PM
Skandia Recluse on June 19, 2009 at 4:10 PM
I was responding to two different people.
Tom_Shipley on June 19, 2009 at 4:12 PM
I did consider MB4′s suggestion and replied with my thoughts on it.
Tom_Shipley on June 19, 2009 at 4:13 PM
Tom_Shipley on June 19, 2009 at 3:43 PM
You don’t know? You have no fundamental principle on which to base a statement?
It should be easy.
The United States has always stood for and celebrated individual freedom; freedom of expression, freedom to live your life without interference from your government, or your neighbors. In the United States, good government has always meant limited government. Limited to that amount of government that maintains a peaceful society where all men and women are treated equally before the law.
Obama can not say any of that, and does not believe any of it, and apparently, Mr Shipley, neither do you.
Skandia Recluse on June 19, 2009 at 3:59 PM
EXCELLENT!!
NJ Red on June 19, 2009 at 4:14 PM
No, basically it is one that he has not expressed even tepidly. The others he has expressed so tepidly as to be basically the equivalent of “Have a nice day”. That’s about it. Just enough to try and cover his sorry arse. Just face it, he wants as much power as he can grab in his own country, so where his sentiments, re government v. people, really are is pretty clear.
MB4 on June 19, 2009 at 4:15 PM
“ALL HANGS IN THE BALANCE”
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2009/06/-all-hangs-in-the-balance.html
izoneguy on June 19, 2009 at 4:19 PM
I warned you about Tom :)
But the important thing to remember is,
BARACK OBAMA IS AN EPIC FAILURE ON THIS, AND EVERYTHING ELSE.
RECORD UNEMPLOYMENT, PENDING DEPRESSION, SKYROCKETING DEFICITS, INTERNATIONAL CHAOS, NUCLEAR THREATS, FAILING SUPREME CT. NOMINATION, CORRUPT CABINET, BAILOUTS, BUY-OUTS, NATIONALIZATIONS, SELLING OF AMBASSADORSHIPS, SELLING-OUT OF GAYS, DESTRUCTION OF PRIVATE BUSINESS AND HEALTHCARE.
HE MUST BE STOPPED. JOIN THE RESISTANCE TODAY. :)
JiangxiDad on June 19, 2009 at 4:20 PM
In Tom Shipley’s world everything is Obama administration syphocant propaganda. Nothing is what it is because everything is what it isn’t. And contrary-wise; what it is, it isn’t, and what it isn’t, it is. You see?
Cheshire Cat on June 19, 2009 at 4:22 PM
Gird your Loins”
Joe Biden is Nostradamus.
portlandon on June 19, 2009 at 3:22 PM
Joe Biden in Nostra Dumbass
hip shot on June 19, 2009 at 4:23 PM
Schadenfreude on June 19, 2009 at 4:26 PM
So if you were to respond to 25 different people, would you have 25 different stories? Must be hard to keep track. I am glad I am just a cat.
Cheshire Cat on June 19, 2009 at 4:27 PM
What reasons do lefties, true liberals, those for the freedom to peacefully demonstrate, without the fear of dying, have to take Obama or the U.S. seriously any more? You, as an intellectual should fight for this, 24 hours a day, 365. Alas…
Schadenfreude on June 19, 2009 at 4:30 PM
“…I’m committed to working with American Muslims to ensure that they can fulfill zakat,” Barack Obama
econavenger on June 19, 2009 at 4:31 PM
And so it happened, because there is no defense of Obama’s appeasement of the Iranian mullahs.
Loxodonta on June 19, 2009 at 4:35 PM
Shipley and his ‘intellectuals’ are all a bunch of eunuchs, who’d stand to learn a few things on courage from the young in Iran. You’re all talk, always. When it comes down to it, you relly support tyranny.
Schadenfreude on June 19, 2009 at 4:38 PM
Obama has demonstrated less backbone than the French. Nicolas Sarkozy said, “These elections are an atrocity!” Obama has said that there is not much difference between Ahmadinejad and Moussavi, and by implication between their supporters.
MB4 on June 19, 2009 at 4:46 PM
Not.Fit.To.Lead.
bluelightbrigade on June 19, 2009 at 4:50 PM
Obama, regarding the Iranian protesters: Let them eat cake.
Loxodonta on June 19, 2009 at 4:51 PM
“Permission to fire……” would be a good start.
BobMbx on June 19, 2009 at 4:59 PM
I’m not going to fault Obama for his failure to rise to the moment here. He doesn’t have the experience or talent to handle it any better than this. He’s completely dependent on his advisors and I imagine the cacophony of disparate voices ringing in his head from all their “advice” is probably making him wish he could find a quiet corner to himself somewhere, knock back a beer, smoke some cigarettes and catch a White Sox game on the tube.
The private residence is out, right? Because…well, you know, Michelle’s there…
Bennett on June 19, 2009 at 5:02 PM
Cowboys are from Texas, this is goatboy following his fathers footsteps
bluegrass on June 19, 2009 at 5:10 PM
1. Of course this was a sham election. What do you call an election in which the candidates are limited to those blessed by permanent and supreme rulers?
2. It doesn’t matter. Try, try, try to understand that concept.
blink on June 19, 2009 at 5:23 PM
“The American people have always stood for freedom. America supports the Iranian people’s inalienable right to freedom, democracy and self determination.
America calls upon the Iranian government to ensure that Iranians’ votes are counted, and that the election is brought to a conclusion in a free and fair manner.”
Simple.
Oh wait Obambi doesn’t like free elections: see his vote stealing in Michigan, Florida, Dem convention, Senator nomination race in Chicago …
Dear Barry has never liked elections …
Hope on June 19, 2009 at 5:29 PM
If Obama had been president in 1939 he would probably have refused to support the Brits, after all..what business is it of ours. In fact a lot of those America Firsters were actually kind of partial to the Nazis. I am not so sure Obama would not have been one of them.
Terrye on June 19, 2009 at 5:37 PM
Tom:
Oh Good God, Obama could tell you the earth was flat and you would buy it.
Of course it is a sham of an election. The lengths people go to make excuses for this disgrace of a president just astounds me.
Terrye on June 19, 2009 at 5:38 PM
Obama wants to be a Supreme Leader himself some day, so he can’t diss them now.
profitsbeard on June 19, 2009 at 6:49 PM
Absolutely, We’ve been making fun of Obama since he started running for all the times he voted, “Present.” We said, “You can’t just vote ‘Present’ when you’re the president.”
Apparently, you can.
And when you’re really stuck, you can blame Bush!
ThereGoesTheNeighborhood on June 19, 2009 at 8:57 PM
B.O.
Master of the Big Lie.
For those of us who have been paying attention, it is obvious the exact opposite is true.
Wingo on June 19, 2009 at 9:35 PM
That’s just pitiful.
Obama and the Brits are truly a bunch of world class pantywaists. How low both the US and Britain have sunk.
sarahpalinfan99 on June 20, 2009 at 3:10 AM
Barack Hussein Obama can not be on the side of the evil colonizers. Especially not when Kenya seeks ways to use their new tanks.
FeFe on June 20, 2009 at 1:40 PM
Has anyone mentioned a two-state solution?
FeFe on June 20, 2009 at 1:42 PM
“Mister Gorbachev, long live this wall.”
RD on June 20, 2009 at 4:17 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2