Iran blames US despite Obama’s waffling
posted at 2:14 pm on June 17, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Rule 1 of the Iranian regime: no matter the circumstance or the occupant of the White House, blame the American Great Satan for all your woes. The mullahcracy rejected the soft-pedaled response from the White House to the massive unrest it unleashed this week, thanks to blatant election-rigging, and blamed Barack Obama for fomenting the protests. We wish:
Iran accused the United States of meddling in its internal affairs, alleging for the first time that Washington has fueled a bitter post-election dispute.
A state television channel in Iran said the government summoned the Swiss ambassador, who represents U.S. interests in Iran, to complain about American interference. The two countries broke off diplomatic relations after the 1979 Islamic Revolution. An English-language state-run channel quoted the government as calling Western interference “intolerable.”
Earlier in the day, Iranian opposition leader Mir Hossein Mousavi called for a mass rally Thursday to protest election results and violence against his followers. The announcement, posted on Mr. Mousavi’s Web site Wednesday, came shortly after the country’s most powerful military force said Iranian Web sites and bloggers must remove any materials that “create tension” or face legal action.
Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has told Mr. Mousavi to pursue his demands through the electoral system and called for Iranians to unite behind their Islamic government. But Mr. Mousavi appears unwilling to back down. “We want a peaceful rally to protest the unhealthy trend of the election and realize our goal of annulling the results,” Mr. Mousavi said, according to the Associated Press.
Obama has tiptoed on eggshells regarding the sudden onslaught of demonstrations and oppression, apparently believing that his lack of public effort on behalf of the protestors would win him brownie points with the Iranian mullahs. Obviously, Obama got this wrong, and it shows the naiveté of his entire approach on foreign policy, especially in the Middle East. Obama believes that our troubles there spring from American arrogance rather than the brutal, oppressive regimes that rule the area. His apology tour was designed to make America look humble and contrite, and Obama believes that will win the respect of dictators and kleptocrats.
It doesn’t. A weaker, humbled, contrite America emboldens dictators and kleptocrats, making them believe that they will not suffer consequences from their actions. In the meantime, they have no problem continuing to use America as a Great Satan in order to distract the oppressed from their situation. In an extreme like the mullahs face at the moment, it’s the first page in the playbook.
Since the Iranians will accuse us of interference no matter what we do, perhaps the White House will belatedly do what France and Germany have already done — express support for the Iranian people and the notion of true self-determination in Iran.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3
I’ll answer my own question: Hugo Chavez complimented Obama’s swift nationalization of most of the U.S. auto industry, stating that he and Castro needed to watch out or Obama would end up to the left of them. So that’s one world leader who thinks more highly of the United States since Obama took office. But it’s not because of Obama’s skillful reading of teleprompters. It’s because a communist dictator admires Obama’s communist dictator-like actions. So I guess it doesn’t count after all. Oh, well. I’ll keep thinking.
aero on June 17, 2009 at 6:00 PM
Is Iran to blame for the outcome of our last election?
Cybergeezer on June 17, 2009 at 6:11 PM
Obama seems to think that the mullahs really give a rat’s ass what he thinks of them. They don’t. They will hate him because he is the President of the United States and no amount of butt kissing will change that.
Terrye on June 17, 2009 at 6:38 PM
So predictable. Unfortunately Obambi’s waffling was predictable as well.
aikidoka on June 17, 2009 at 7:20 PM
They want any way to blame the USA. Maybe a low key approach is best. If they can make us the bad guy then they can keep Amaneshad or whatever in power.
CWforFreedom on June 17, 2009 at 7:27 PM
LIAR. You voted for Obama.
Geochelone on June 17, 2009 at 7:35 PM
The problem isn’t who is in power whether it’s Amanutjob Dinnerjacket or Mohammad Morkilling Iran remains a Islamic terrorist state. The problem is Islam.
doriangrey on June 17, 2009 at 7:38 PM
Can we hear Jeremiah Wright statement about this?
Yes we can!
Obama’s chickens are coming home to roost!
Loxodonta on June 17, 2009 at 7:42 PM
Heh!
ladyingray on June 17, 2009 at 7:43 PM
You sure their not coming home to roast?????
doriangrey on June 17, 2009 at 7:51 PM
Especially for you, just heat and serve.
Loxodonta on June 17, 2009 at 8:02 PM
Now what am I going to do with the pot of crock I am cooking for dinner???
doriangrey on June 17, 2009 at 8:08 PM
That’s barbaric! Please get help.
And STOP cooking yourself!
HELP! I don’t know what to do! Should I report this self abuse to Allahpundit?!!!
Loxodonta on June 17, 2009 at 8:16 PM
Hey, I forgot about the “I was not born yet” or the “I was only 6 yrs. old” excuse! Good one!
Uh, as to the Iranian response, I blame Evan Thomas, or whoever it was that said he was God. I also blame all that have promoted Obama as the “Messiah”, and that would include his staff, and Obama himself. He did claim he could make the seas recede! Logic would dictate that the mullahs, and high command in Iran would object. So ultimately it is all Obama’s fault.
freeus on June 17, 2009 at 8:26 PM
Oh dear no… I am crocking a roast, and drinking Samuel Adams Boston Lager… But I haven’t crocked enough roast or bought enough SA for him too… ;p
doriangrey on June 17, 2009 at 8:27 PM
Didn’t anyone bother to tell Barry that the large ‘Kick Me’ sign on the backsides of W actually goes with the office, and its not attached to the person permanently? Jeez you think he would have understood that… American Presidents have been getting kicked in the behind trying to do ‘good will’ gestures and sitting in Rose Gardens and not going after Iran when it kills hundreds of our soldiers…
I thought Barry was supposed to be ’smart’?
Guess he never bothered to read a history book not written by a leftist… or by anyone the way things are shaping up.
Nice guys finish last.
And they are the easiest to blame for anything as they are just so earnest and stumbling in trying to be nice that they look like patsies. International affairs is not a game for the faint of heart, the shining of smile and the ill-read. Too much Alinsky, not enough Machiavelli.
He is going to get a lot of people killed, our Neville Obama will…
ajacksonian on June 17, 2009 at 8:30 PM
Then have a good evening, enjoy yourself, and be safe.
And if you’re a good boy, you can have Obama waffles in the morning.
[Made fresh daily!]
Loxodonta on June 17, 2009 at 8:36 PM
This recent popular uprising is much better than if Moussavi had won the election out rightly. This has weakened the mullahs and gives the young people courage and their movement some sense of legitimacy!
With respect to the mullahtocracy… my favorite political pundit had this to say.
Or in this case, with respect to the young and energetic, population of Iran, “the gradual deterioration of” … their spirit, free will and usurpation of their votes, may inspire a revolution?
Who cudda, thunk it?
Geezer on June 17, 2009 at 8:40 PM
Lesson to Obama from more sophisticated Iranians–Never give an incompetant US president an even break.
This lesson was given to Jimmy Carter, even though he was clueless at the time. It seems that Obama is another clueless, utopian-wishful-thinking fool.
BottomLine5 on June 17, 2009 at 8:41 PM
Golly…guess the apologizing and being just short of supportive of these kinds hasn’t really worked out.
Huh. Who woulda thunk?
Dr. ZhivBlago on June 17, 2009 at 8:44 PM
Obama is an ideologue, and ideologues are not smart, they are single-mindedly driven by their ideas in spite of reality.
Yes, a lot of our people are going to die because of President Hope’nChange.
BottomLine5 on June 17, 2009 at 8:45 PM
Good article…
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NTI4OThjNDYwOTllYjBiNDE4OWRlY2Y2NWY5ZDMyODE=
Upstater85 on June 17, 2009 at 9:00 PM
Wow, I can’t believe the Iranian leaders aren’t won over by nuance.
karlant on June 17, 2009 at 9:11 PM
Hm. Obama goes out of his way to not “meddle” and Iran claims we’re meddling anyway.
How….how can that be??!!
A few days ago I thoguth this would be over by now.
But they can’t turn back now. If these protesters fail, and dinner-jacket comes back into power, the bloodshed will be epic.
It’s just too damn bad this couldn’t have happened while Bush was in office. At least then they would have had a strong ally in the WH. Someone who would have given a damn about them.
But…too late now.
Goes without saying of course that if the best thing happens the MSM will give complete credit to Obama.
B Man on June 17, 2009 at 9:14 PM
Geezer says…
Geezer on June 17, 2009 at 9:17 PM
Ahhh…. But isnt the real question…. Will I be able to eat them???
doriangrey on June 17, 2009 at 9:17 PM
So, if they think we did this to them let them go ahead and attack us in some way. We’ll crush their nuts then cave in their skulls and it’ll be done with once and for all.
Spiritk9 on June 17, 2009 at 9:35 PM
I wouldn’t be so proud of you if you could eat Obama waffles. So you can have anything else you want.
Loxodonta on June 17, 2009 at 10:00 PM
The futility of Obama’s actions were evident to anyone with a minimal understanding of Middle Eastern culture. They are a bit like the Klingons: swift and decisive action is pretty much the only thing Iran (and many other nations) will ‘listen to’.
Dark-Star on June 17, 2009 at 10:48 PM
Is anyone else reminded of Ash from the first Alien movie?
As long as we are on the subject of movie tie-ins.
B Man on June 17, 2009 at 11:32 PM
We have failed the free world.
Obama has failed.
We have failed.
Saltysam on June 18, 2009 at 12:30 AM
Don’t blame US….Blame Obama he aplogized to you!
BigMike252 on June 18, 2009 at 2:12 AM
They still control state media and are blocking what they can. If they make this accusation stick and hold another election the hardliners win. Obama should have kept his mouth shut.
Bill Blizzard on June 18, 2009 at 2:39 AM
What would he gain by keeping his mouth shut?
Iran would still say we were messing with them.
Either way we’re meddling.
Obama can’t win with the hardliners.
His great mistake is thinking he can.
B Man on June 18, 2009 at 3:16 AM
The photo of Obama being used on the main page with this post: HE’S GOT CRAZY EYES.
Lourdes on June 18, 2009 at 7:41 AM
Obama voted ‘present’, saying he didn’t want to ‘meddle’. They threw the ‘meddle’ word right back at him. Bwahahaha! Such a pantywaist is he.
petefrt on June 18, 2009 at 8:18 AM
Radical muslims enjoy blowing themselves up, and we enjoy blowing them up. You’d think we’d get along better…
Keemo on June 18, 2009 at 9:05 AM
Which of course proves my point that tough talk is meaningless.
orange on June 18, 2009 at 2:42 PM
I find it interesting that the right suddenly cares what Europe thinks of an American president. He’s still more popular than Bush, you must admit.
The European people.
I’m not the one claiming that speeches can change the world.
Can you provide hard evidence that it was Reagan’s speeches that had the primary effect? Or even a significant effect?
Yeah free from tyranny, but not free from being killed.
More importantly, Saddam wasnt deposed because of Bush’s speeches. It was because of Bush’s war.
orange on June 18, 2009 at 2:49 PM
The reason the President refuses to stand up for protesters in Iran is because he sees the future, and the future involves Americans protesting in the streets of the U.S. against him.
mobydutch on June 18, 2009 at 3:05 PM
Just like with the Somali pirates, I’m sure Obama is “closely monitoring the situation” and “receiving regular updates” while waiting for Nick Sarkozy to take the lead….
rwenger43 on June 18, 2009 at 4:46 PM
BHO is upset because the Iranians used different community organizing techniques than he would have recommended….
rwenger43 on June 18, 2009 at 4:47 PM
Gee, one would think the “current” president of Iraq came into power since Obama was elected … are you privy to timelines?
Monkei on June 18, 2009 at 6:34 PM
can’t we just send Palin over to Iraq to dumb them down a little?
Monkei on June 18, 2009 at 6:35 PM
President “Present” just can’t take a position.
jgapinoy on June 18, 2009 at 9:14 PM
Her intelligence does tend to make others–like Biden & you–look “dumb” by comparison.
jgapinoy on June 18, 2009 at 9:15 PM
If we are then Obama’s more incompetent than I thought
DSchoen on June 18, 2009 at 10:46 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3