<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The GOP would have more credibility &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/16/the-gop-would-have-more-credibility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/16/the-gop-would-have-more-credibility/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 21:28:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: race42008.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Race-Baiting A Negative For American Politics &#38; Culture</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/16/the-gop-would-have-more-credibility/comment-page-9/#comment-2708418</link>
		<dc:creator>race42008.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Race-Baiting A Negative For American Politics &#38; Culture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56297#comment-2708418</guid>
		<description>[...] gorilla editorial was horribly offensive, and the now-infamous Tennessee state senator staffer who sent out a racist picture of American presidents doesn&#8217;t help [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] gorilla editorial was horribly offensive, and the now-infamous Tennessee state senator staffer who sent out a racist picture of American presidents doesn&#8217;t help [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peacenprosperity</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/16/the-gop-would-have-more-credibility/comment-page-9/#comment-2323401</link>
		<dc:creator>peacenprosperity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56297#comment-2323401</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have a degree in communications and have never worked in the public relations field but I think this would have been long gone if the politician this dope worked for released this statement,

“Today I relieved “whatever her name is” from her duties in my office. An offensive, and frankly stupid, cartoon was forwarded to her and instead of deleting the cartoon immediately “whatever her name is” passed it on to others. I have no doubt that “whatever her name is” is in no way racist and my guess is that the person who sent her the cartoon is in no way racist. This cartoon is an example of the kind of simple minded and personal attacks that those of the opposing political philosophy have developed since they are unable to defend their own ideas or constructively refute opposing ideas. These tactics were glaringly apparent in the recent attacks on Gov. Palin and her family and the good citizens of this country who expressed their concern of the government policies through their participation in the recent Tea Party demonstrations. We are proud and confident of our philosophy and ability to communicate and implement them and do not need to resort to the tactics of the left. We will continue to openly and honestly communicate our ideas while always following the Golden Rule.”

But no, this idiot politician never realized the obvious or acted in a manner that would indicate she had any idea of how this stuff works. She fell right into the leftist trap and made things worse for herself and anyone connected to her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have a degree in communications and have never worked in the public relations field but I think this would have been long gone if the politician this dope worked for released this statement,</p>
<p>“Today I relieved “whatever her name is” from her duties in my office. An offensive, and frankly stupid, cartoon was forwarded to her and instead of deleting the cartoon immediately “whatever her name is” passed it on to others. I have no doubt that “whatever her name is” is in no way racist and my guess is that the person who sent her the cartoon is in no way racist. This cartoon is an example of the kind of simple minded and personal attacks that those of the opposing political philosophy have developed since they are unable to defend their own ideas or constructively refute opposing ideas. These tactics were glaringly apparent in the recent attacks on Gov. Palin and her family and the good citizens of this country who expressed their concern of the government policies through their participation in the recent Tea Party demonstrations. We are proud and confident of our philosophy and ability to communicate and implement them and do not need to resort to the tactics of the left. We will continue to openly and honestly communicate our ideas while always following the Golden Rule.”</p>
<p>But no, this idiot politician never realized the obvious or acted in a manner that would indicate she had any idea of how this stuff works. She fell right into the leftist trap and made things worse for herself and anyone connected to her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robertnyc212</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/16/the-gop-would-have-more-credibility/comment-page-9/#comment-2323264</link>
		<dc:creator>robertnyc212</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56297#comment-2323264</guid>
		<description>right4life on June 18, 2009 at 7:54 AM
&quot;talk about not knowing history….Nixon had a huge landslide all over the country…did the northeast vote for him because he was a racist??? 

Good morning my Brother.  You&#039;re missing the point rcl was making. In the 60&#039;s the repubs engaged in a southern strategy to win over the &quot;cracker vote&quot; and the WH.  That is historical fact. And I believe you are referring to the Nixon win over McGovern which was indeed a landslide.  rcl was referring to the Nixon win over HH which was by less than half a million votes.  So without the cracker vote Nixon would have lost to HH.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>right4life on June 18, 2009 at 7:54 AM<br />
&#8220;talk about not knowing history….Nixon had a huge landslide all over the country…did the northeast vote for him because he was a racist??? </p>
<p>Good morning my Brother.  You&#8217;re missing the point rcl was making. In the 60&#8217;s the repubs engaged in a southern strategy to win over the &#8220;cracker vote&#8221; and the WH.  That is historical fact. And I believe you are referring to the Nixon win over McGovern which was indeed a landslide.  rcl was referring to the Nixon win over HH which was by less than half a million votes.  So without the cracker vote Nixon would have lost to HH.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peacenprosperity</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/16/the-gop-would-have-more-credibility/comment-page-9/#comment-2323257</link>
		<dc:creator>peacenprosperity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56297#comment-2323257</guid>
		<description>Most of these posts is indicative of what&#039;s wrong with this country and the republican party. Someone sent this cartoon to this woman and she didn&#039;t have the sense to delete it. When this women&#039;s boss didn&#039;t see the position she put the republican party in by not deleting the cartoon is the only controversey. This was a bad joke. There have been bad jokes since the development of irony in the human brain. It doesn&#039;t change the world, affect the country, influence the electorate or hurt anyone who isn&#039;t looking for a reason to be upset. The left looks for and creates these controversies to keep continuous smoke screens up to blind the American people. If anyone thinks that there is not an organized, active office somewhere in this country with leftist operatives looking for opportunities like this then you shouldn&#039;t be allowed to vote because you are out of touch with reality. And employees of that office send these manufactured scandals and controversies to the &quot;useful idiots&quot; among the psuedo-conservative punditry who aid them by fueling these controversies while trying to convince everyone that they are so enlightened and offended. The policies of the leftist democrat party have destroyed the black family and enslaved past black generations and generations to come in illiteracy, poverty and conflict. And the useful idiots of the republican party get their panties in a wad over stupidity like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of these posts is indicative of what&#8217;s wrong with this country and the republican party. Someone sent this cartoon to this woman and she didn&#8217;t have the sense to delete it. When this women&#8217;s boss didn&#8217;t see the position she put the republican party in by not deleting the cartoon is the only controversey. This was a bad joke. There have been bad jokes since the development of irony in the human brain. It doesn&#8217;t change the world, affect the country, influence the electorate or hurt anyone who isn&#8217;t looking for a reason to be upset. The left looks for and creates these controversies to keep continuous smoke screens up to blind the American people. If anyone thinks that there is not an organized, active office somewhere in this country with leftist operatives looking for opportunities like this then you shouldn&#8217;t be allowed to vote because you are out of touch with reality. And employees of that office send these manufactured scandals and controversies to the &#8220;useful idiots&#8221; among the psuedo-conservative punditry who aid them by fueling these controversies while trying to convince everyone that they are so enlightened and offended. The policies of the leftist democrat party have destroyed the black family and enslaved past black generations and generations to come in illiteracy, poverty and conflict. And the useful idiots of the republican party get their panties in a wad over stupidity like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right4life</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/16/the-gop-would-have-more-credibility/comment-page-9/#comment-2322608</link>
		<dc:creator>right4life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56297#comment-2322608</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Redneck Woman says Robert and I don’t know history. Well Redneck, segregationist Geo. Wallace took Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, Arkansas, Louisianna and North Carolina in 1968. Richard Nixon won them all in 1972. Do you think the populace of the South had a mass change of heart on Republican economic policy?

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

talk about not knowing history....Nixon had a huge landslide all over the country...did the northeast vote for him because he was a racist???  

laughable

and nixon instituted affirmative action...before 1972 I believe...sigh...


&lt;blockquote&gt;The Lord says the sins of the fathers will be visited upon his children for three or four generations. We’ve got one or two more to go before America’s paid her debt on race.

rcl on June 18, 2009 at 2:19 AM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

the Lord ain&#039;t a big fan of twisting His words for your own political ends....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Redneck Woman says Robert and I don’t know history. Well Redneck, segregationist Geo. Wallace took Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, Arkansas, Louisianna and North Carolina in 1968. Richard Nixon won them all in 1972. Do you think the populace of the South had a mass change of heart on Republican economic policy?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>talk about not knowing history&#8230;.Nixon had a huge landslide all over the country&#8230;did the northeast vote for him because he was a racist???  </p>
<p>laughable</p>
<p>and nixon instituted affirmative action&#8230;before 1972 I believe&#8230;sigh&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>The Lord says the sins of the fathers will be visited upon his children for three or four generations. We’ve got one or two more to go before America’s paid her debt on race.</p>
<p>rcl on June 18, 2009 at 2:19 AM
</p></blockquote>
<p>the Lord ain&#8217;t a big fan of twisting His words for your own political ends&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris_Balsz</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/16/the-gop-would-have-more-credibility/comment-page-9/#comment-2322501</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris_Balsz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 06:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56297#comment-2322501</guid>
		<description>&quot;Whaddya mean &quot;we&quot;, white man?&quot; 

You&#039;re running on fumes when you&#039;re trying to extort me based on my supposed guilt for my grandparents. 

Funny how the political movement based &quot;only&quot; on opposition to civil rights not only failed to assault civil rights, it also failed to condemn its own failure. That&#039;s unlike any Republicans I ever met. 

McGovern lost because his party is chock full of looney tunes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Whaddya mean &#8220;we&#8221;, white man?&#8221; </p>
<p>You&#8217;re running on fumes when you&#8217;re trying to extort me based on my supposed guilt for my grandparents. </p>
<p>Funny how the political movement based &#8220;only&#8221; on opposition to civil rights not only failed to assault civil rights, it also failed to condemn its own failure. That&#8217;s unlike any Republicans I ever met. </p>
<p>McGovern lost because his party is chock full of looney tunes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rcl</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/16/the-gop-would-have-more-credibility/comment-page-9/#comment-2322486</link>
		<dc:creator>rcl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 06:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56297#comment-2322486</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Your party (assuming you are a rep) consciously sought out these dixiecrats.

robertnyc212 on June 16, 2009 at 6:15 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hey smartie pants, name all those Dixiecrats who became Republican. You can’t because that is a meme that has been perpetuated for years and is completely untrue...

And why was Dr. King a Republican? Why was he not a Democrat?

Redneck Woman on June 17, 2009 at 9:52 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I see Robert may be in the house so I&#039;m bringing this back up from page 7. I brought up the Dixiecrat thing though I didn&#039;t use the word.  Redneck Woman is pulling a Sean Hannity selected history trick; she&#039;s technically right but thoroughly wrong.  When I brought the issue up I knew someone might slap back.  The change was regional not individual.  I can&#039;t recall any &quot;Dixiecrats&quot; that jumped ship like Sen. Shelby or Arlen Specter but the &quot;Solid South&quot; became solid GOP territory for one reason only, opposition to the Democrat &quot;Civil Rights&quot; legislative agenda including Affirmative Action and minority targeted welfare and social programs.  

Redneck Woman says Robert and I don&#039;t know history.  Well Redneck, segregationist Geo. Wallace took Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, Arkansas, Louisianna and North Carolina in 1968. Richard Nixon won them all in 1972.  Do you think the populace of the South had a mass change of heart on Republican economic policy?

It was race that tipped the balance and everyone paying attention knew it.  I bet I&#039;m with you Redneck Woman on policy issues most of the time, but I&#039;m not going to lie about the past to justify the present.

The Lord says the sins of the fathers will be visited upon his children for three or four generations.  We&#039;ve got one or two more to go before America&#039;s paid her debt on race.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Your party (assuming you are a rep) consciously sought out these dixiecrats.</p>
<p>robertnyc212 on June 16, 2009 at 6:15 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Hey smartie pants, name all those Dixiecrats who became Republican. You can’t because that is a meme that has been perpetuated for years and is completely untrue&#8230;</p>
<p>And why was Dr. King a Republican? Why was he not a Democrat?</p>
<p>Redneck Woman on June 17, 2009 at 9:52 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>I see Robert may be in the house so I&#8217;m bringing this back up from page 7. I brought up the Dixiecrat thing though I didn&#8217;t use the word.  Redneck Woman is pulling a Sean Hannity selected history trick; she&#8217;s technically right but thoroughly wrong.  When I brought the issue up I knew someone might slap back.  The change was regional not individual.  I can&#8217;t recall any &#8220;Dixiecrats&#8221; that jumped ship like Sen. Shelby or Arlen Specter but the &#8220;Solid South&#8221; became solid GOP territory for one reason only, opposition to the Democrat &#8220;Civil Rights&#8221; legislative agenda including Affirmative Action and minority targeted welfare and social programs.  </p>
<p>Redneck Woman says Robert and I don&#8217;t know history.  Well Redneck, segregationist Geo. Wallace took Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, Arkansas, Louisianna and North Carolina in 1968. Richard Nixon won them all in 1972.  Do you think the populace of the South had a mass change of heart on Republican economic policy?</p>
<p>It was race that tipped the balance and everyone paying attention knew it.  I bet I&#8217;m with you Redneck Woman on policy issues most of the time, but I&#8217;m not going to lie about the past to justify the present.</p>
<p>The Lord says the sins of the fathers will be visited upon his children for three or four generations.  We&#8217;ve got one or two more to go before America&#8217;s paid her debt on race.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robertnyc212</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/16/the-gop-would-have-more-credibility/comment-page-9/#comment-2322088</link>
		<dc:creator>robertnyc212</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 03:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56297#comment-2322088</guid>
		<description>I guess the spell check police are no longer on the prowl. I&#039;m out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the spell check police are no longer on the prowl. I&#8217;m out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robertnyc212</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/16/the-gop-would-have-more-credibility/comment-page-9/#comment-2322067</link>
		<dc:creator>robertnyc212</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 03:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56297#comment-2322067</guid>
		<description>&quot;kinda&quot; numb in fact.
Itchee Dryback on June 17, 2009 at 10:07 PM

Be careful Itchee, the spell check/punctuation police is on the prowl.  I&#039;d consider changing Itchee to Itchy as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;kinda&#8221; numb in fact.<br />
Itchee Dryback on June 17, 2009 at 10:07 PM</p>
<p>Be careful Itchee, the spell check/punctuation police is on the prowl.  I&#8217;d consider changing Itchee to Itchy as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robertnyc212</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/16/the-gop-would-have-more-credibility/comment-page-9/#comment-2322014</link>
		<dc:creator>robertnyc212</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 02:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56297#comment-2322014</guid>
		<description>Esthier on June 17, 2009 at 9:26 PM
What, past your bedtime? Even in New York it’s still early.

I was still at work revising a contract for a client.  I derive what little pleasure from my miserably boring work by thrashing you repubs on HA.  It&#039;s a guilty pleasure I know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Esthier on June 17, 2009 at 9:26 PM<br />
What, past your bedtime? Even in New York it’s still early.</p>
<p>I was still at work revising a contract for a client.  I derive what little pleasure from my miserably boring work by thrashing you repubs on HA.  It&#8217;s a guilty pleasure I know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robertnyc212</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/16/the-gop-would-have-more-credibility/comment-page-9/#comment-2321980</link>
		<dc:creator>robertnyc212</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 02:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56297#comment-2321980</guid>
		<description>Esthier on June 17, 2009 at 9:26 PM

You&#039;re hired if you can correct this fine example of sentence construction:

&quot;Which has been your argument the entire time, the more sophisticated “I know you are but what am I?” from racism to reading comprehension.&quot;
Esthier on June 17, 2009 at 7:40 PM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Esthier on June 17, 2009 at 9:26 PM</p>
<p>You&#8217;re hired if you can correct this fine example of sentence construction:</p>
<p>&#8220;Which has been your argument the entire time, the more sophisticated “I know you are but what am I?” from racism to reading comprehension.&#8221;<br />
Esthier on June 17, 2009 at 7:40 PM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Itchee Dryback</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/16/the-gop-would-have-more-credibility/comment-page-9/#comment-2321827</link>
		<dc:creator>Itchee Dryback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 02:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56297#comment-2321827</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Thank you. Your finally catching up.

robertnyc212 on June 17, 2009 at 8:28 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

 I think you&#039;re punch drunk...kinda numb in fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Thank you. Your finally catching up.</p>
<p>robertnyc212 on June 17, 2009 at 8:28 PM</p></blockquote>
<p> I think you&#8217;re punch drunk&#8230;kinda numb in fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esthier</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/16/the-gop-would-have-more-credibility/comment-page-9/#comment-2321638</link>
		<dc:creator>Esthier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 01:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56297#comment-2321638</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I know, it’s late, my bad. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

What, past your bedtime? Even in New York it&#039;s still early.

&lt;blockquote&gt;But you can compare it to the other examples where I’ve spelled it properly.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And give you the benefit of doubt that you don&#039;t extend to others even when you have ample evidence of their innocence to choose from and yet choose the one instance of their error?

It&#039;s your rules I&#039;m playing by here.

&lt;blockquote&gt;The next time I need to hire a secretary I’ll keep you in mind. Bye.

robertnyc212 on June 17, 2009 at 9:02 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sorry, but I don&#039;t work for racists, and the editing you require is more than one person has time for. I&#039;ve only corrected your spelling, not your punctuation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I know, it’s late, my bad. </p></blockquote>
<p>What, past your bedtime? Even in New York it&#8217;s still early.</p>
<blockquote><p>But you can compare it to the other examples where I’ve spelled it properly.</p></blockquote>
<p>And give you the benefit of doubt that you don&#8217;t extend to others even when you have ample evidence of their innocence to choose from and yet choose the one instance of their error?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s your rules I&#8217;m playing by here.</p>
<blockquote><p>The next time I need to hire a secretary I’ll keep you in mind. Bye.</p>
<p>robertnyc212 on June 17, 2009 at 9:02 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Sorry, but I don&#8217;t work for racists, and the editing you require is more than one person has time for. I&#8217;ve only corrected your spelling, not your punctuation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robertnyc212</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/16/the-gop-would-have-more-credibility/comment-page-9/#comment-2321513</link>
		<dc:creator>robertnyc212</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 01:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56297#comment-2321513</guid>
		<description>Esthier on June 17, 2009 at 8:57 PM

I know, it&#039;s late, my bad.  But you can compare it to the other examples where I&#039;ve spelled it properly.  So thank you as I know that&#039;s your (not you&#039;re) basic function here.  The next time I need to hire a secretary I&#039;ll keep you in mind.  Bye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Esthier on June 17, 2009 at 8:57 PM</p>
<p>I know, it&#8217;s late, my bad.  But you can compare it to the other examples where I&#8217;ve spelled it properly.  So thank you as I know that&#8217;s your (not you&#8217;re) basic function here.  The next time I need to hire a secretary I&#8217;ll keep you in mind.  Bye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esthier</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/16/the-gop-would-have-more-credibility/comment-page-9/#comment-2321469</link>
		<dc:creator>Esthier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56297#comment-2321469</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Thank you. Your finally catching up.

robertnyc212 on June 17, 2009 at 8:28 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You&#039;re. You are using two words, not one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Thank you. Your finally catching up.</p>
<p>robertnyc212 on June 17, 2009 at 8:28 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>You&#8217;re. You are using two words, not one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robertnyc212</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/16/the-gop-would-have-more-credibility/comment-page-9/#comment-2321379</link>
		<dc:creator>robertnyc212</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56297#comment-2321379</guid>
		<description>Chris_Balsz on June 17, 2009 at 8:32 PM

Sorry, I&#039;ve dished out enough beat downs for today.  You&#039;ll have to wait your turn next time...I&#039;m out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris_Balsz on June 17, 2009 at 8:32 PM</p>
<p>Sorry, I&#8217;ve dished out enough beat downs for today.  You&#8217;ll have to wait your turn next time&#8230;I&#8217;m out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robertnyc212</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/16/the-gop-would-have-more-credibility/comment-page-9/#comment-2321356</link>
		<dc:creator>robertnyc212</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56297#comment-2321356</guid>
		<description>Chris_Balsz on June 17, 2009 at 8:32 PM

Uh oh, here comes the pine riders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris_Balsz on June 17, 2009 at 8:32 PM</p>
<p>Uh oh, here comes the pine riders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris_Balsz</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/16/the-gop-would-have-more-credibility/comment-page-9/#comment-2321330</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris_Balsz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56297#comment-2321330</guid>
		<description>Remind me again, Mr. Empirical Evidence, when was the last lynching at a GOP convention?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remind me again, Mr. Empirical Evidence, when was the last lynching at a GOP convention?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robertnyc212</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/16/the-gop-would-have-more-credibility/comment-page-9/#comment-2321298</link>
		<dc:creator>robertnyc212</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56297#comment-2321298</guid>
		<description>Itchee Dryback on June 17, 2009 at 8:19 PM

Thank you.  Your finally catching up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Itchee Dryback on June 17, 2009 at 8:19 PM</p>
<p>Thank you.  Your finally catching up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Itchee Dryback</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/16/the-gop-would-have-more-credibility/comment-page-9/#comment-2321253</link>
		<dc:creator>Itchee Dryback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56297#comment-2321253</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The jig is up&lt;/blockquote&gt;

 Now &lt;em&gt;thats &lt;/em&gt; good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The jig is up</p></blockquote>
<p> Now <em>thats </em> good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Six Meat Buffet &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Compare and Contrast: Liberal Rorschach Edition</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/16/the-gop-would-have-more-credibility/comment-page-9/#comment-2321241</link>
		<dc:creator>Six Meat Buffet &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Compare and Contrast: Liberal Rorschach Edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56297#comment-2321241</guid>
		<description>[...] It seems a staff secretary for a local politician did what most every bored secretary does at some point during the day &#8211; she forwarded an e-mail.  An admittedly tasteless one, but one that nevertheless is missing the intent to make this the national story it became. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It seems a staff secretary for a local politician did what most every bored secretary does at some point during the day &#8211; she forwarded an e-mail.  An admittedly tasteless one, but one that nevertheless is missing the intent to make this the national story it became. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robertnyc212</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/16/the-gop-would-have-more-credibility/comment-page-9/#comment-2321149</link>
		<dc:creator>robertnyc212</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56297#comment-2321149</guid>
		<description>dpierson on June 17, 2009 at 7:50 PM

The jig is up, you got me with one exception:  I&#039;m no liberal but you can call me Rush.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dpierson on June 17, 2009 at 7:50 PM</p>
<p>The jig is up, you got me with one exception:  I&#8217;m no liberal but you can call me Rush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dpierson</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/16/the-gop-would-have-more-credibility/comment-page-9/#comment-2321136</link>
		<dc:creator>dpierson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56297#comment-2321136</guid>
		<description>There is no way robertnyc212 is a black guy. Only a fat, dumb, white liberal would so willingly embrace every single lame black stereotype as their own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no way robertnyc212 is a black guy. Only a fat, dumb, white liberal would so willingly embrace every single lame black stereotype as their own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robertnyc212</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/16/the-gop-would-have-more-credibility/comment-page-9/#comment-2321104</link>
		<dc:creator>robertnyc212</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56297#comment-2321104</guid>
		<description>Esthier on June 17, 2009 at 7:40 PM

That was cogent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Esthier on June 17, 2009 at 7:40 PM</p>
<p>That was cogent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esthier</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/16/the-gop-would-have-more-credibility/comment-page-9/#comment-2321096</link>
		<dc:creator>Esthier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=56297#comment-2321096</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Classic projection.

robertnyc212 on June 17, 2009 at 7:34 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Which has been your argument the entire time, the more sophisticated &quot;I know you are but what am I?&quot; from racism to reading comprehension. Might help to get your own argument next time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Classic projection.</p>
<p>robertnyc212 on June 17, 2009 at 7:34 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Which has been your argument the entire time, the more sophisticated &#8220;I know you are but what am I?&#8221; from racism to reading comprehension. Might help to get your own argument next time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
