Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Letterman to apologize to Palin tonight

posted at 8:17 pm on June 15, 2009 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

The Times says he’s apologizing “again” but that implies that he apologized the first time, which he didn’t. He does tonight, but it’s still not clear that he understands what he’s apologizing for. Note to Dave: Yes, the “perception” that you were talking about Palin’s 14-year-old daughter getting knocked up made it a bad joke. The reality that you were talking about her 18-year-old daughter getting knocked up makes it a bad — albeit less bad — joke too. How about eschewing sex jokes about teens altogether in the future, champ? Full transcript via TV Week:

All right, here – I’ve been thinking about this situation with Governor Palin and her family now for about a week – it was a week ago tonight, and maybe you know about it, maybe you don’t know about it. But there was a joke that I told, and I thought I was telling it about the older daughter being at Yankee Stadium. And it was kind of a coarse joke. There’s no getting around it, but I never thought it was anybody other than the older daughter, and before the show, I checked to make sure in fact that she is of legal age, 18. Yeah. But the joke really, in and of itself, can’t be defended. The next day, people are outraged. They’re angry at me because they said, ‘How could you make a lousy joke like that about the 14-year-old girl who was at the ball game?’ And I had, honestly, no idea that the 14-year-old girl, I had no idea that anybody was at the ball game except the Governor and I was told at the time she was there with Rudy Giuliani…And I really should have made the joke about Rudy…” (audience applauds) “But I didn’t, and now people are getting angry and they’re saying, ‘Well, how can you say something like that about a 14-year-old girl, and does that make you feel good to make those horrible jokes about a kid who’s completely innocent, minding her own business,’ and, turns out, she was at the ball game. I had no idea she was there. So she’s now at the ball game and people think that I made the joke about her. And, but still, I’m wondering, ‘Well, what can I do to help people understand that I would never make a joke like this?’ I’ve never made jokes like this as long as we’ve been on the air, 30 long years, and you can’t really be doing jokes like that. And I understand, of course, why people are upset. I would be upset myself.

“And then I was watching the Jim Lehrer ‘Newshour’ – this commentator, the columnist Mark Shields, was talking about how I had made this indefensible joke about the 14-year-old girl, and I thought, ‘Oh, boy, now I’m beginning to understand what the problem is here. It’s the perception rather than the intent.’ It doesn’t make any difference what my intent was, it’s the perception. And, as they say about jokes, if you have to explain the joke, it’s not a very good joke. And I’m certainly – ” (audience applause) “- thank you. Well, my responsibility – I take full blame for that. I told a bad joke. I told a joke that was beyond flawed, and my intent is completely meaningless compared to the perception. And since it was a joke I told, I feel that I need to do the right thing here and apologize for having told that joke. It’s not your fault that it was misunderstood, it’s my fault. That it was misunderstood.” (audience applauds) “Thank you. So I would like to apologize, especially to the two daughters involved, Bristol and Willow, and also to the Governor and her family and everybody else who was outraged by the joke. I’m sorry about it and I’ll try to do better in the future. Thank you very much.” (audience applause)

Does this mean the “Fire Letterman” protest tomorrow is canceled? Aw. While you ponder, here’s a related clip from today’s Cavuto reminding us once again that Fred Thompson is the luckiest man in the world. Exit question: What really motivated Letterman to do this? Sincere remorse? A cynical play for more ratings? Or the simple fact that he was starting to lose sponsors over it?


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4 5

So, that’s Letterman’s apology. He wasn’t making a crude sexual joke about Sarah Palin’s 14 year old daughter. He was making a crude sexual joke about Sarah Palin’s 18 year old daughter. That’s so much better. And, it’s not really his fault. It was the perception of his intentions that was bad. So he’s going to apologize, not for what he siad, but for our misperception.

kozmocostello on June 15, 2009 at 11:47 PM

Here’s my problem, and it’s what I teach my children. When you apologise you put the pressure on the offended to make everything all right.

If you ask for forgiveness the pressure is on the offending party to make everything better.

Forgiveness is what he’ll get from the public at-large and maybe even the Palins, but he didn’t ask for it.

rihar on June 15, 2009 at 11:50 PM

If Bristol Palin really wants to escape national ridicule, why become a spokeswoman for abstinence?

Speedwagon82 on June 15, 2009 at 11:41 PM

I had a similar thought about George Tiller.

Ronnie on June 15, 2009 at 11:50 PM

I use my wife as a barometer of what’s a happenin’ in the world of politics. She’s a-political. Votes Republican but that’s mainly to shut me up. Anyway, when she heard about this “joke” she was pissed, like really pissed in a “mmm hmmm you go girlfriend” kind of way. Which tells me Davey isn’t going to get a pass on this with some bull$hit 1/2 assed apology.

angryed on June 15, 2009 at 11:52 PM

With so many rats, though, you don’t want to waste all your energy on only one.

ddrintn on June 15, 2009 at 10:29 PM

John McCain is that you?

Leatherface is toast. Let him pound sand and tommorrow’s rats will be dealt with in their own good time.

papertiger on June 15, 2009 at 11:54 PM

If Bristol Palin really wants to escape national ridicule, why become a spokeswoman for abstinence? Is that really necessary? Everything before that was intruding on her privacy but when she joins the media circus, it makes it hard to keep her out of public ridicule.
Speedwagon82

Bristol Palin wasn’t there. Try and keep up K!

Let me see if I understand your point.

A teenager unwed gets “knocked up” and that makes it’s okay to joke about rapping a 14 year-old?

Is that your point Speedwagon82?

If yes, then you are saying cuz Obama’s mother, an unwed teenage got “knocked up” its okay to joke about rapping a 14 year-old?

Is that it Speedo?

DSchoen on June 15, 2009 at 11:57 PM

BTW Did you hear that Carrie Prejean on Gretta Van Sustrein?
She said that there were three other gays on the judge’s panel at the Miss America pagent.

On what planet do you pick four fudge packers to judge a beauty pagent?

That should be a scandle in itself.

papertiger on June 16, 2009 at 12:03 AM

Is that perv really 62? So that means he was 42 the last time he was funny.

angryed on June 16, 2009 at 12:09 AM

As with Jeri Ryan, another “celebrity” changes the course of American politics.

ezye on June 16, 2009 at 12:19 AM

Tom_Shipley

“They’re more about making “funny” connections — A-Rod is a cad, Palin’s daughter (and Palin herself) are prone to pregnancy”

Seriously Tom, are you an idiot?

Tom, YOUR mother and grandmother (ALL of them Tom) were and are along with yours or anyone else daughters “prone to pregnancy”

Seriously Tom, are you an idiot?

“As he said, the joke was flawed and in poor taste. But I think the he had any personal malice in the joke”

Seriously Tom, are you an idiot?

He is telling a joke about a 14 year-old girl, daughter of Gov. Palin being raped. Obviously it was not “funny”, and if not for “malice” what was the point?

Please explain only using the KNOWN facts. Facts like Letterman was fully aware that it was 14 year-old Willow at the game AND that Bristol was not at the game.

“He’s just working with existing public perceptions, but he missed badly with this one”.

And what drives this “public perceptions” jokes? Lies?

Seriously Tom, you are an idiot?

DSchoen on June 16, 2009 at 12:34 AM

I’ll be more impressed if he were to also call the Palins personally and apologize. Even invite her on the show for an unheard-of situation for the Palins; a friendly interview on national TV

michaelo on June 16, 2009 at 12:38 AM

DSchoen on June 15, 2009 at 11:45 PM

Excellent post! I hope those calling for his head have this info because this just proves they should have known, and his claims are indeed lies. Thanks for putting this up!

freeus on June 16, 2009 at 12:43 AM

I’m not much for words but from what I saw tonight on LNw/DL was pathetic.

The first part of the show was dedicated to an apology to S.P.

Next was Jack Black making fun of The Bible.

Then there was the Doctor and his take on Global Warming.

Anybody see a history in this 90 minutes?

CBFLATLINE on June 16, 2009 at 12:45 AM

DSchoen on June 15, 2009 at 11:57 PM

Put aside this particular joke. What happens the next time someone makes a joke about BRISTOL’S sexual practices when she is specifically named. Are conservatives now permanently obligated to complain about them? We would be in a much better position to if she wasn’t going on abstinence speaking tours.

Speedwagon82 on June 16, 2009 at 12:46 AM

Just another demonstration of how utterly clueless Liberals are.The Libs are calling that an apology.”I told a bad joke”-yes Dave your apologies are bad jokes.”Knock,knock……”is a bad joke
“Governor Slut,your daughter is a whore” is NOT a BAD JOKE.”Governor Slut,your daughter got raped”is NOT a BAD JOKE.These are viscious unwarranted attacks on an undeserving LADY and her family,and on women in general.Yet not only can Letterman not see the truth about his statements,unfortunately neither can female liberal (so called) journalists.it doesn’t matter if the target of such garbage is 14,18,32,46,or any age ,the insult isn’t about Sarah’s daughter,it is about all of our daughters.
Perhaps those female liberals don’t consider being called whore or slut insulting.So to them I say,”If the shoe fits,wear it”,while you angage in hate f***ing.
Instead of denigrating Mrs.Palen,the liberal womaen should learn from her example how to be a truly strrong,independent woman—and how to do it with class.Just because these women lack the courage to”take on a comedian”,doesn’t mean that all women are so lacking in principles or intelligence.As far as the one who wrote that Sarah isn’t smart enough to beat Letterman, I would say that Sarah took took him to the woodshed,like his daddy should have done a long time ago.
It really is to bad that Liberals are so blind,that they can never see the truth when it is right in front of them.

DDT on June 16, 2009 at 12:47 AM

Here’s Letterman’s apology if you’re interested.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVAgAJ9MD4o

Ronnie on June 16, 2009 at 12:47 AM

I think this case is closed, and it should be. I blame Letterman for being an idiot, and a liberal idiot at that. But this thing has gone on too long now. Yeah, it’s his fault. He should have apologized the day after his stupid joke, but he didn’t and he kept it going since he probably thought his ratings would go up and Conan would suffer as a result. Problem is, it blew up in his face.

I don’t buy the explanation that he was watching PBS and that’s when he finally “got it”. I think the suits at CBS had enough, and someone gave Dave the memo that he needed to fix this thing.

I predict this will usher in Dave’s retirement. He’s tired, his show is tired, and we’re all tired of him.

‘Night Dave.

PunditGuy on June 16, 2009 at 12:53 AM

Moesart on June 15, 2009 at 10:54 PM

Tell it to embassy suites.

Fighton03 on June 16, 2009 at 12:57 AM

Seriously Tom, you are an idiot?

DSchoen on June 16, 2009 at 12:34 AM

that’s a stronger hypothesis than AGW.

Fighton03 on June 16, 2009 at 12:59 AM

Letterman did not ask for forgiveness. He simply does not get the impact of his words. He is incapable of understanding.Time for him to go away and retire. His words are not contrite–they are an explanation.

He is just a bitter old liberal with an axe to grind. And he just happens to have knocked up his girlfriend Regina Lasko who bore his bastard son Harry. Now Harry is the child of a celebrity–shall we joke about his sexuality on National TV impugning it and ridiculing it? Perhaps it would be funny if we called his now wife a person trying to achieve “a slutty flight attendant look”? Would that be “funny”. NO IT WOULD NOT.

Now will he make amends and visit the subjects of his vulgar and degrading statements-like Imus did? Hell no–he has no class. And that might actually humanize them! Can’t have that!

Buckeye Babe on June 16, 2009 at 1:00 AM

We would be in a much better position to if she wasn’t going on abstinence speaking tours.

Speedwagon82 on June 16, 2009 at 12:46 AM

No we wouldn’t, because unlike the donkeys, we learn from out mistakes. not to say the GOP does, but most conservatives learn. We get knocked down, dirty, then pick ourselves back up, dust ourselves off, and get back in the fray.

Fighton03 on June 16, 2009 at 1:05 AM

Here’s Letterman’s apology if you’re interested.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVAgAJ9MD4o

Ronnie on June 16, 2009 at 12:47 AM

not interested. I read the transcript. Maybe I PERCEIVED it wrong, but Dave is sad, bitter, irrelevant little pedophilic parasite living in the sewer that is network tv.

Fighton03 on June 16, 2009 at 1:09 AM

I would never say it of course but widdle day-day jr. in the back alley of the daycare……..

DCJeff on June 16, 2009 at 1:15 AM

I thought Letterman’s apology was thoughtful and not perfunctory at all. I hope it is accepted. Time will tell on the motives– of everyone.

dullhammer on June 16, 2009 at 1:22 AM

When people show you what they are – BELIEVE THEM! Dave has made it clear that he is an assclown. His audiences have proven that they are low life lemmings. And Governor Palin and her family have shown us that they have grace, strength, and a principled attitude that rises above nasty comments made by narrow-minded liberals.

redwhiteblue on June 16, 2009 at 1:26 AM

I thought Letterman’s apology was thoughtful and not perfunctory at all. I hope it is accepted. Time will tell on the motives– of everyone.

dullhammer on June 16, 2009 at 1:22 AM

He’s still running with the excuse that he slandered an 18-year-old instead of a 14-year-old. What’s so thoughtful about that?

Ronnie on June 16, 2009 at 1:36 AM

Jeri Thompson = WOWZA (esp as a brunette!)

Further proof of teh Fred!’s alpha-male status.

Harpazo on June 16, 2009 at 1:41 AM

Why does anyone think it is OK to be crude about an 18 year old girl, but not a 14 year old?

Seabecker on June 16, 2009 at 1:46 AM

Next was Jack Black making fun of The Bible.

CBFLATLINE on June 16, 2009 at 12:45 AM

That segment was titled “Slovenly, Intellectually-Challenged Jew hates on own ethnic heritage, culture; also on books containing words less delicious than ‘beer’”

Harpazo on June 16, 2009 at 1:49 AM

Liberals will never understand because they think of everything as a gray area. They can’t draw any lines because it would mean they are wrong about something.

Ok..ok.. unless its good and right and moral, they have definitely shown that they want nothing to do with those areas.

GoodBoy on June 16, 2009 at 2:16 AM

I don’t think he was trying to weasel out of it. Yes, he did say the perception didn’t match the intent, but he also said it didn’t matter and it was his fault. He also apologized to the Palins, and Willow and Bristol in particular. It would’ve been better if he’d just said this in the first place, but it sounds like a genuine apology to me. If the Palins say it’s over, it’s over.

Jim Treacher on June 16, 2009 at 2:37 AM

I would like for Letterman to be fired.. just to send a message to Hollyweird that enough is enough.

GoodBoy on June 16, 2009 at 3:02 AM

If the Palins say it’s over, it’s over.

Jim Treacher on June 16, 2009 at 2:37 AM
.
Works for me.

Americannodash on June 16, 2009 at 3:11 AM

If the Palins say it’s over, it’s over.

Jim Treacher on June 16, 2009 at 2:37 AM
.
Works for me.

Americannodash on June 16, 2009 at 3:11 AM

Me too. I hope they do. They have gotten way more apology then I ever gave Dave credit for, and in all honesty, they will not get any more out of him.

Regardless, the apology even if it was overly prefaced, was clear. At the end, he apologized directly by name to the girls and to the family.

Karl on June 16, 2009 at 3:33 AM

I would like for Letterman to be fired.. just to send a message to Hollyweird that enough is enough.

GoodBoy on June 16, 2009 at 3:02 AM

And to prove that offensiveness isn’t in the eye of the beholder, you’ll support Al Sharpton on his next crusade to get some media figure fired, right?

YYZ on June 16, 2009 at 3:39 AM

Palin/Jeri Thompson 2012

Hawtest ticket evah!

GrayLoess on June 16, 2009 at 3:39 AM

And to prove that offensiveness isn’t in the eye of the beholder, you’ll support Al Sharpton on his next crusade to get some media figure fired, right?

YYZ on June 16, 2009 at 3:39 AM

If people agree with Al Sharpton, they should support him. If they don’t, they shouldn’t. Is this really a difficult concept to grasp?

Ronnie on June 16, 2009 at 3:48 AM

And to prove that offensiveness isn’t in the eye of the beholder, you’ll support Al Sharpton on his next crusade to get some media figure fired, right?

I believe it’s the double standard that has so many of us ticked off about this. People who offend the Liberals get raked over the coals big time…those who offend Conservatives are excused.

I don’t think Letterman should be fired nor do I think Imus should have been. Don’t like them? Don’t listen to/watch them. However, that doesn’t mean that neither Letterman nor Imus shouldn’t have been called by the public on what they said. That, I believe, is reasonable.

Dr. ZhivBlago on June 16, 2009 at 3:59 AM

I am willing to put this to pasture. I always believed that Bristol was the intended target and that his writers simply screwed the pooch. I don’t think that Letterman knew that Bristol wasn’t the daughter in question until after the fact.

Simply stated: He wasn’t making a crude sexual joke about Sarah Palin’s 14 year old daughter. He was making a crude sexual joke about Sarah Palin’s 18 year old daughter. The difference being that the latter has reached the age of consent; the former has not.

Making a joke about Bristol getting “knocked up” by A-Rod is indefensible, but no more so than Letterman’s crack about Gov. Palin’s “slutty flight attendant look.” But because it was Willow — and not Bristol — that was there, it became a joke about child rape.

eaglescout1998 on June 16, 2009 at 4:02 AM

If people agree with Al Sharpton, they should support him. If they don’t, they shouldn’t. Is this really a difficult concept to grasp?

Ronnie on June 16, 2009 at 3:48 AM

Well, you didn’t call for David Letterman to be fired.

YYZ on June 16, 2009 at 4:14 AM

Well, you didn’t call for David Letterman to be fired.

YYZ on June 16, 2009 at 4:14 AM

What difference does that make? If Al Sharpton calls for a Duke coach to be fired, no one’s allowed to call for Dave to be fired unless they support Al Sharpton? That’s silly. Use a little judgement.

Ronnie on June 16, 2009 at 4:30 AM

Speedwagon82
We would be in a much better position to if she wasn’t going on abstinence speaking tours.

Palin is on this “tour” of NY doing charity fund raisers for children with disabilities.

At one of these charity she drew a crowd of 20K in NY!
Can you draw a crowed of 20K?

Can YOU make up donations lost if she were not doing these tours?

And why EXACTLY are you against children with disabilities?

Another question, what is it about doing charity fund raisers for children with disabilities that warrants an attack on her 14 year-old daughter Willow?

Why would doing fund raisers for children with disabilities cause someone like your self to start making jokes?

Personally, if someone I don’t like, is doing charity work, I give them a free pass that day or that “tour”, other wise you are attacking the “cause” of the charity, and that’s kinda stupid.

Like when that SC from comedy central was doing the USO show, I’m not going to attack him cuz I would really like to see MORE Celbs doing USO shows.

DSchoen on June 16, 2009 at 4:42 AM

At least it wasn’t one of those “if I offended anybody” non-apologies. There was way too much beating around the bush, but in the end he did take responsibility, apologize to both daughters, the family, and everybody who WAS offended by what he admitted was an inappropriate joke.

Not the most sincere apology I ever heard, to be sure, but better than I’ve come to expect in that sort of situation.

Letterman didn’t even attempt to apologize for the “slutty flight attendant” joke — but I’ll bet he doesn’t tell another one like it, either.

The Palins won.

Tres Angelas on June 16, 2009 at 6:43 AM

apology…….not accepted

marktarheel on June 16, 2009 at 6:44 AM

Just look at the video of him telling the jokes. He relished it. Reveled in it. He set up the joke, hesitated for a second, waited for the audience to quiet, shifted his feet and with a delirious look in his eye delivers the punchline/s.

HE KNEW what kind of jokes they were. He couldn’t wait to tell them. It’s not like he was just reading a teleprompter and got sandbagged with a distasteful joke. HE LAUGHED. HE THOUGHT IT WAS FUNNY.

IT wasn’t funny, it was disgusting and perverted just like most of the discourse coming from the Left.

Urban Infidel on June 16, 2009 at 6:59 AM

The fact of the matter STILL is; he’s a 62 year old man joking about the rape of a 14 or 18 year old. It’s not should he still be fired. It’s how fast he can leave the building. Apology or not.

By the way, has the FCC been disbanded? What does one have to do to get the FCC fining CBS? Jokes regarding the rape of a 14 year old is not enough??!!

Jeff from WI on June 16, 2009 at 7:17 AM

It’s not that she’s a woman. She’s a white woman. A GOP white woman.

With Liz Cheney, Jeri T. and ‘Cuda…we got the market cornered.

LtE126 on June 16, 2009 at 7:20 AM

Simply stated: He wasn’t making a crude sexual joke about Sarah Palin’s 14 year old daughter. He was making a crude sexual joke about Sarah Palin’s 18 year old daughter. The difference being that the latter has reached the age of consent; the former has not.

eaglescout1998 on June 16, 2009 at 4:02 AM

Hey eaglescout,

Here’s a “groundbreaking” idea. Making jokes about the kids of politicians getting knocked isn’t appropriate- no matter the age of the child. Using your logic, Mary Cheney is open for all the Lesbian jokes Letterman wants to hurl at her because she is over 21.

Sarah Palin is the public figure, not her kids. While not funny, the slutty flight attendant “joke” was fair game since Palin is the one out there in elective office and making speeches. I firmly believe that the children of public figures deserve privacy. I also am certain that Palins kids were not afforded the same hands-off coverage that we saw for Chelsea Clinton or the Obama brats. It’s a double standard that is unforgivable.

highhopes on June 16, 2009 at 7:28 AM

apology…….not accepted

marktarheel on June 16, 2009 at 6:44 AM

Actually the only one who can accept/reject the apology is the Palin family. The rest of us can move on or keep up the protests about the initial “joke.” Personally, I think the point has been clearly made and it is time to move on.

highhopes on June 16, 2009 at 7:30 AM

At least it wasn’t one of those “if I offended anybody” non-apologies. There was way too much beating around the bush, but in the end he did take responsibility, apologize to both daughters, the family, and everybody who WAS offended by what he admitted was an inappropriate joke.

Not the most sincere apology I ever heard, to be sure, but better than I’ve come to expect in that sort of situation.

Letterman didn’t even attempt to apologize for the “slutty flight attendant” joke — but I’ll bet he doesn’t tell another one like it, either.

The Palins won.

Tres Angelas on June 16, 2009 at 6:43 AM

Read the entire thread and there were lots of great comments but this is perhaps the best summary of the situation.

The Palins did win (good on everyone for speaking up and standing up; Letterman wouldn’t have apologized otherwise)and most liberals are going to think hard three or four times before they treat them with such disgusting disrespect again.

Now for the lowlife exception that proves the rule…anyone have Bill Maher’s email address? Been toolin around and can’t find contact info for him anywhere.

inviolet on June 16, 2009 at 7:31 AM

But there was a joke that I told, and I thought I was telling it about the older daughter being at Yankee Stadium. … but I never thought it was anybody other than the older daughter, and before the show, I checked to make sure in fact that she is of legal age, 18.

…was followed by this:

And I had, honestly, no idea that the 14-year-old girl, I had no idea that anybody was at the ball game.

OK, so which is it? He checked that the 18-year-old would be at the game, or he didn’t know she would be at the game? If he “had no idea that anybody was at the ball game”, then how in the world could he have hatched a joke about, of all possible things, a teenage girl being at the ball game? I mean, really?

crushliberalism on June 16, 2009 at 7:32 AM

Another question, what is it about doing charity fund raisers for children with disabilities that warrants an attack on her 14 year-old daughter Willow?

DSchoen on June 16, 2009 at 4:42 AM

I honestly don’t think that Letterman or his writers gave it that much thought. They saw a chance to attack Palin with an A-Rod joke and took it without thinking twice. It is utter BS when Letterman claims he vetted the joke and thought he was talking about an 18-year-old. They simply didn’t look that deeply or care. All they saw was the “comedy gold” of Palin’s daughter at a baseball game and worked it into a reference to A-Rod.

highhopes on June 16, 2009 at 7:36 AM

I am willing to put this to pasture. I always believed that Bristol was the intended target and that his writers simply screwed the pooch. I don’t think that Letterman knew that Bristol wasn’t the daughter in question until after the fact.

eaglescout1998 on June 16, 2009 at 4:02 AM

I would buy that except for one fact. On the following night’s show, after it was well known that it was Willow at the game, he makes another joke about them and Elliot Spitzer. He only apologized when he was forced to IMHO.

Countrysquire on June 16, 2009 at 7:52 AM

“Mary Cheney is open for all the Lesbian jokes Letterman wants to hurl at her”

Never happen. 99.9% of lez’s are dems.

That was no apology…it was another “I’m sorry if YOU misunderstood me” apologys.

LtE126 on June 16, 2009 at 8:01 AM

It’s the perception rather than the intent.

BS, Dave. That’s just BS. You intended it just the way it sounded and just the way it was perceived.

petefrt on June 16, 2009 at 8:02 AM

If the Palins say it’s over, it’s over.

Jim Treacher on June 16, 2009 at 2:37 AM

And what if they don’t, Jim? What if the Palins do nothing but maintain an icy silence?

You know why weasels get a bad rap, Jim? Weasels love eggs; eggs are like candy to them. They will find an unattended nest of eggs, and then use their sharp front teeth to poke a hole in the egg just large enough to suck the insides out. Thing is, they leave the rest of the shell untouched. Without looking rather closely and finding that tiny hole, a person may be none the wiser that the eggs were damaged, and the mother bird will come right back and sit on them like nothing happened — until, because of the absence of the cushioning white inside, the shells collapse under the mama bird’s weight.

That being said, David Letterman is nothing but a weasel. To think that his apology was sincere is naive, and I think you know better Jim. I hope so.

CBS was set to bleed advertisers cause of this thing. Just the fact that Dave had to “apologize” twice is suspect in my eyes…

gryphon202 on June 16, 2009 at 8:10 AM

Seriously Tom, are you an idiot?

8 ball says……..ABSOLUTELY

angryed on June 16, 2009 at 8:14 AM

Just another one of his stupid pet tricks

bluegrass on June 16, 2009 at 8:27 AM

The Palins did win (good on everyone for speaking up and standing up; Letterman wouldn’t have apologized otherwise)and most liberals are going to think hard three or four times before they treat them with such disgusting disrespect again.

inviolet on June 16, 2009 at 7:31 AM

That was more of a “business” apology rather than a sincere apology. We’re talking about liberals here, the attacks are going to continue. Most of the “men” will back off (if you can call them that) for now. The women will now be attacking her (Babawa, Whoopi,etc).

RedRobin145 on June 16, 2009 at 8:29 AM

NY daily News Poll: Fire Him?

yes 71%
no 27%

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/tv/2009/06/15/2009-06-15_fire_david_letterman_campaign_takes_root_protest_planned_over_comment_on_sarah_p.html

Go Vote.

Geochelone on June 16, 2009

The “yes” is now at 72%.
If Letterman had two functioning brain cells to rub together he would never have made that stupid, insulting joke. He is classless, tasteless, clueless and remorseless. His “apology” is meaningless in light of it’s being coerced by higher-ups. It has all the weight of a Clinton statement (”you should put some ice on that”).
I will continue to remind his advertisers that their support of him is costing them money.

SKYFOX on June 16, 2009 at 8:35 AM

Dave stressed so much that the problem was the perception and not the intent.

My question is: What was his INTENT?

Darksean on June 16, 2009 at 8:47 AM

And what if they don’t, Jim? What if the Palins do nothing but maintain an icy silence?

Then they don’t and they maintain an icy silence.

To think that his apology was sincere is naive, and I think you know better Jim. I hope so.

gryphon202 on June 16, 2009 at 8:10 AM

He directly apologized to Bristol and Willow, which was the main thing he needed to do. He took responsiblity for what happened, admitted there was no excuse for it, and said he wouldn’t do it again. I refuse to behave like Al Sharpton, demanding an apology and then refusing to accept it.

Yeah, it would’ve been better if this had happened last week, but it happened this week. I’m not saying I suddenly like Letterman again. But he did what we asked. I’m not going to hound him for it.

Jim Treacher on June 16, 2009 at 8:49 AM

I see absolutely NO difference whether he was joking about a 14 year old, an 18 year old, or about Sarah Palin herself.
There is no difference.

bridgetown on June 16, 2009 at 8:56 AM

He directly apologized to Bristol and Willow, which was the main thing he needed to do. He took responsiblity for what happened, admitted there was no excuse for it, and said he wouldn’t do it again. I refuse to behave like Al Sharpton, demanding an apology and then refusing to accept it.

Yeah, it would’ve been better if this had happened last week, but it happened this week. I’m not saying I suddenly like Letterman again. But he did what we asked. I’m not going to hound him for it.

Jim Treacher on June 16, 2009 at 8:49 AM

I agree. I also say don’t fire him just so he can keep showin’ his true colors to the world.

bridgetown on June 16, 2009 at 8:58 AM

I don’t think he was trying to weasel out of it. Yes, he did say the perception didn’t match the intent, but he also said it didn’t matter and it was his fault. He also apologized to the Palins, and Willow and Bristol in particular. It would’ve been better if he’d just said this in the first place, but it sounds like a genuine apology to me. If the Palins say it’s over, it’s over.

Jim Treacher on June 16, 2009 at 2:37 AM

My thoughts exactly. Watch the video…it looks pretty sincere. Time to let it go.

changer1701 on June 16, 2009 at 9:04 AM

Jim Treacher on June 16, 2009

Obviously some are assuaged by insincere, forced apologies. I never suggested he apologize because I knew it wouldn’t be sincere. Egotistical asshat celebrities see ratings points, not people. If they still have a sense of shame, they don’t recognize it or mistake it for indigestion.

SKYFOX on June 16, 2009 at 9:07 AM

Losing sponsers??

Think again, she doesn’t have that much power in main-stream America.

Fighting for Sarah? Has the world gone mad?

AprilOrit on June 16, 2009 at 9:15 AM

What about when she appeared on SNL and Amy Poeler did that rap song about her family then?

What’s the difference?

AprilOrit on June 16, 2009 at 9:20 AM

What about her appearance on SNL with Amy Poehler rapping and making fun of her family?

What’s the difference?

AprilOrit on June 16, 2009 at 9:21 AM

But there was a joke that I told, and I thought I was telling it about the older daughter being at Yankee Stadium. … but I never thought it was anybody other than the older daughter, and before the show, I checked to make sure in fact that she is of legal age, 18.

…was followed by this:

And I had, honestly, no idea that the 14-year-old girl, I had no idea that anybody was at the ball game.

From what he said, all he knew was that Palin and Rudy were at the game. To make the joke that A-Rod got his daughter pregnant, she didn’t have to be at the game. As I said before, it’s about playing off broad stereotypes. What’s Bristol Palin most-known for? Getting pregnant. That’s a fact. A-Rod, the Yankees biggest star, is well-known for sleeping around.

The joke is you put both those people in the same place (in the universe of this joke, it doesn’t matter is Bristol was actually there or not), and pregnancy happens. I completely buy that Letterman had zero intention of making the joke about the younger daughter. And the joke was in poor taste, which he admitted. He apologized to both daughters. It should be over.

Tom_Shipley on June 16, 2009 at 9:28 AM

He was probably forced to apologize because of the attention Sarah Palin was getting, the people that were rallying behind her. The Looney Left told him to do it and do it now..

reshas1 on June 16, 2009 at 9:28 AM

He was probably forced to apologize because of the attention Sarah Palin was getting, the people that were rallying behind her. The Looney Left told him to do it and do it now..

reshas1 on June 16, 2009 at 9:28 AM

Instead of worrying about this non-story I am more concerned about the racist crap soiling the GOP like this.
And there was another similar instance last week.

It makes the Party and normal Republicans like my parents and family look absolutely insane and why isn’t this real outrage being covered??

I wish Srah’s folks and Fred’s wife would speak out against this kind of trash.

AprilOrit on June 16, 2009 at 9:36 AM

AprilOrit, my husband is a black Republican, and I am sorry, but that pic isn’t ANYTHING LIKE THE THINGS HE IS CALLED BY THE LEFT… Have you EVER gone to the lefts web sites and how they talk about Repbulicans???? About Black Republicans?? About George W Bush? About Condi Rice? About Sarah Palin..
You better persuse those sites if you think that is SO bad..
It is in bad taste, I don’t condon it, but put a little perspective on it..

reshas1 on June 16, 2009 at 9:51 AM

AprilOrit, my husband is a black Republican, and I am sorry, but that pic isn’t ANYTHING LIKE THE THINGS HE IS CALLED BY THE LEFT… Have you EVER gone to the lefts web sites and how they talk about Repbulicans???? About Black Republicans?? About George W Bush? About Condi Rice? About Sarah Palin..
You better persuse those sites if you think that is SO bad..
It is in bad taste, I don’t condon it, but put a little perspective on it..

reshas1 on June 16, 2009 at 9:51 AM

Amen! The kind of garbage that Black Republicans or Black Conservatives have to go through is unreal.
It’s easy to be white and be a Republican or Conservative, since all you have to do is defeat liberals by using logic on them. A Black Republican/Conservative has to not only battle liberal stupidity, but has to be called every name ion the book by their own race. They are the REAL patriots. (Besides the troops of course).

Jeff from WI on June 16, 2009 at 10:06 AM

Obviously some are assuaged by insincere, forced apologies. I never suggested he apologize because I knew it wouldn’t be sincere. Egotistical asshat celebrities see ratings points, not people. If they still have a sense of shame, they don’t recognize it or mistake it for indigestion.

SKYFOX on June 16, 2009 at 9:07 AM

Okay, Reverend Al.

Jim Treacher on June 16, 2009 at 10:21 AM

Letterman apologized again?

Olbermann’s head is going to EXPLODE!!!

Cannot wait for that clip!

SmallGovtGuy on June 16, 2009 at 10:22 AM

Jeff from WI on June 16, 2009 at 10:06 AM

reshas1 on June 16, 2009 at 9:51 AM

Ok I am going to quote Pape bear here – quoting or pointing to other bad beahavior doesn’t make it right.

And furthermore I could care less what The Left does – I avoid their sites because that’s them and this is us.

We are better. We are the party of abolistionists – we never should go there – at all.

AprilOrit on June 16, 2009 at 10:23 AM

Letterman didn’t apologize out of remorse.He apologized because a few sponsors were getting upset and threatened to bolt, and the fact that there were going to be pickets at his show the next day.

Jeff from WI on June 16, 2009 at 10:26 AM

Gee, Wally, look what they did to Don Imus.

LarryG on June 16, 2009 at 10:44 AM

BTW Did you hear that Carrie Prejean on Gretta Van Sustrein?
She said that there were three other gays on the judge’s panel at the Miss America pagent.

On what planet do you pick four fudge packers to judge a beauty pagent?

That should be a scandle in itself.

papertiger on June 16, 2009 at 12:03 AM

Your comments should be deleted, it’s disgusting.

AprilOrit on June 16, 2009 at 10:45 AM

Aprilorit, so our party has to be perfect, even in the face of the crap that keeps being heeped on us from the left???
THAT is the bottom of this whole Letterman/Palin dispute. It’s because her teenage daughter got pregnant. Yes, we have some bad apples, BUT IT’S NOTHING COMPARED TO THE TOTALLITY OF ALL THEIR BAD APPLES… You pointing to one instance doesn’t make sense.
I say again, persuse the lefty sites, I have, and it isn’t pretty.

reshas1 on June 16, 2009 at 11:10 AM

we’re too stupid to understand how smart dave is. nice apology, genius.

DrW on June 16, 2009 at 12:13 PM

By the way I discovered that the Examiner has photo shopped a pic of SP.
http://www.examiner.com/x-7494-LA-Gossip-Examiner~y2009m6d15-Jon-Gosselin-contacted-by-Sarah-Palin
Amadeus

Amadeus, did you make a copy of that pic?
I checked the link at the pic/article has been pulled.

DSchoen on June 16, 2009 at 1:52 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4 5


You must be logged in to post a comment.