Video: Iranian thugs beat protester to death in broad daylight

posted at 8:10 pm on June 14, 2009 by Allahpundit

There’s no official confirmation that he died but that’s the word on the street. Best-case scenario is that they “merely” beat him into unconsciousness. Rather than give you just the video of the beating, though, I’m embedding a kaleidoscope of 14 clips put together by Breitbart.com to show you how widespread and violent the protests already are. If you can’t spare a few minutes to watch them all, at least watch the first three plus the seventh, where you’ll find the Basij — essentially Iran’s answer to the Nazi SA — riding by on motorcycles with batons and taking swings at anyone wearing green to indicate support for Mousavi. I’ve read multiple tweets from Iranians today claiming that some of these goons have been heard speaking Arabic, not Farsi, suggesting that they’re actually Hezbollah troops shipped in from Lebanon to help with the crackdown. Whether that’s true or just a rationalization by Iranian students who don’t want to believe their own countrymen would side with the regime against the people, I don’t know.

Mousavi hasn’t been seen since the election, by the way. Is he dead? In prison? Or, as another hot rumor has it, is he meeting with Khatami and Rafsanjani to form a united “reformist” front? Khatami was president for eight years before Ahmadinejad; Rafsanjani is currently head of the Assembly of Experts, Iran’s equivalent of the College of Cardinals. If they align with Mousavi and recruit some of the country’s other leading ayatollahs to their cause, government officials will be forced to take sides and the regime will crack wide open. No wonder they’re in such a hurry to arrest opposition leaders. Meanwhile, after devoting a few hard hours of thought to it since my last post, I’m more puzzled than ever as to why Khamenei would side with Ahmadinejad by endorsing such patently fraudulent results. How does the benefit to him outweigh the cost? Even if he’s worried about Mousavi using the presidency to liberalize Iran, he’d be in a much better position to stop him down the road by leveraging his legitimacy as supreme leader. That’s gone now. And not only is it gone, he chose to throw it away by antagonizing Iran’s youth at a moment when their political consciousness is higher than it’s ever been — after an historic campaign, replete with the country’s first televised presidential debate, and in the midst of a standoff with the whole world over Iran’s nuclear program. It’s insane — especially if, as Time claims, Khamenei is “addicted to the perception of legitimacy for himself and the system.” Either he’s lost his marbles or somebody forced his hand. But who?


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

Wonder if that’s part of the ‘healthy debate’ Obama was talking about?

GarandFan on June 14, 2009 at 8:15 PM

In the Sunday edition of the Buffalo News Iran was not mentioned unitl A8 with an 11 paragraph article from AP… I’m puzzled.

mjbrooks3 on June 14, 2009 at 8:16 PM

I think they’ll have a hard time to lock down and control this.

the_nile on June 14, 2009 at 8:16 PM

Healthy Debate…

RalphyBoy on June 14, 2009 at 8:17 PM

What a horrific regime.

Dr. Manhattan on June 14, 2009 at 8:17 PM

This is the norm… do not act shocked.

mjbrooks3 on June 14, 2009 at 8:18 PM

Smart power!

Wethal on June 14, 2009 at 8:20 PM

Are there chapters of ACORN or the Black Panthers in Iran?

Star20 on June 14, 2009 at 8:21 PM

Iran’s citizenry needs a Second Amendment.
Or a vigorous introduction of smuggled arms.

Mister Ghost on June 14, 2009 at 8:21 PM

Can we officially announce that Obama is not the Lightworker that we were promised?

myrenovations on June 14, 2009 at 8:23 PM

“There’s something happening here,
What it is ain’t exactly clear…”

SteveMG on June 14, 2009 at 8:24 PM

It’s just a tiny country.

Greg Toombs on June 14, 2009 at 8:25 PM

this was the video up earlier from the face book page.

rob verdi on June 14, 2009 at 8:25 PM

I wonder if they are just afraid of seeming to cave to western pressure (by allowing Dinner-Jacket to be repudiated by the electorate).

Dinner-Jacket is the face of Iran, and having him go down would look bad–and they fear that might set off waves of “reform.”

mockmook on June 14, 2009 at 8:26 PM

Wonder if Obama’s speech caused the goons to be so blatant?

promachus on June 14, 2009 at 8:26 PM

Take a look a the recipients of the apologies Obama makes in our name.

You don’t apologize for me Obama, you cowardly jerk!

drunyan8315 on June 14, 2009 at 8:27 PM

This group of thugs are the people Obama wants to reason with…obviously very reasonable people. No way they would do something crazy with nuclear weapons when they get them.

AUINSC on June 14, 2009 at 8:27 PM

What lefty radicals pretend to be the problem with the US is the actual problem in Iran… it’s just easier to be brave with the US Constitution and your parent’s money.

mjbrooks3 on June 14, 2009 at 8:27 PM

Speak out Obama and speak out clearly!

Do you side with the Iranian people or with a fellow power grabber?

MB4 on June 14, 2009 at 8:27 PM

The poverty of realism in foreign policy-making is now being exposed.

Promoting stability is essentially a reactive policy, one that doesn’t know how to respond to events like this.

Thus the silence from our President.

And where the heck is he anyway?

SteveMG on June 14, 2009 at 8:27 PM

No problems! We see no difficulties!

There is nothing happening here! Stolen elections? What stolen elections?

Nothing to see here….move along!

Vntnrse on June 14, 2009 at 8:28 PM

Any word from our Dear Leader, other than he’s cool with whatever? I mean, certainly those uber tech-savvy kids he has in the WH follow twitter…I mean, they know what’s up. Anything? (crickets)

Mommypundit on June 14, 2009 at 8:29 PM

So, do we send a strongly worded letter now?

sybilll on June 14, 2009 at 8:30 PM

But…but.. don’t they understand “The One” is president, now? I’m sure everything will be FINE, after he talks to them.

Star20 on June 14, 2009 at 8:31 PM

Not much difference between this and what happened to Vince Foster. Either way, beating or shot, government thugs killed someone.

Jeff from WI on June 14, 2009 at 8:31 PM

As I said earlier, thank God Americans are armed and thank God for the genius of the Founding Fathers for making sure of it…

TheBigOldDog on June 14, 2009 at 8:31 PM

Thus the silence from our President.

And where the heck is he anyway?

SteveMG on June 14, 2009 at 8:27 PM

My “sources” tell me that he was last seen pulling a cartoon of Camels out of his White House oval office desk and then he went out the back door. My “sources” are not sure when he will be back.

MB4 on June 14, 2009 at 8:31 PM

BHO is probably impressed…

mjbrooks3 on June 14, 2009 at 8:32 PM

So, do we send a strongly worded letter now?

sybilll on June 14, 2009 at 8:30 PM

We’ll go all out , a live apology.

the_nile on June 14, 2009 at 8:32 PM

Hey, anyone remember how important national defence and international affairs were during the election and THEN there was that pesky economic meltdown? I want to say McCain would be a lot better at this point…

Mommypundit on June 14, 2009 at 8:32 PM

Speak out Obama and speak out clearly!

Do you side with the Iranian people or with a fellow power grabber?

MB4 on June 14, 2009 at 8:27 PM

Remember these are the people who believe Government should never let a good crisis goes to waste.

TheBigOldDog on June 14, 2009 at 8:33 PM

Can we officially announce that Obama is not the Lightworker that we were promised?

myrenovations on June 14, 2009 at 8:23 PM

He’s not only not a lightworker, he’s lightheaded. It’s as if the world he is commenting on bears no resemblance to the actual world, and I don’t think most Americans are going to be able to overlook that much longer. He is really starting to look quite unhinged.

Alana on June 14, 2009 at 8:33 PM

Voters don’t like it when elections are rigged.

infidel4life on June 14, 2009 at 8:34 PM

Why are those that have such bumper stickers as “There is only one race The human race” tell us to butt out of such inhumanity ? Are we not one world….only when it suits them I guess.

CWforFreedom on June 14, 2009 at 8:35 PM

I’ve read multiple tweets from Iranians today claiming that some of these goons have been heard speaking Arabic, not Farsi, suggesting that they’re actually Hezbollah troops shipped in from Lebanon to help with the crackdown.

I have read tweets that they are not only Hezbollah but Palestinian thugs working for the Basij.

Which interestingly points to a well planned coup de main that has been in the works for a while and used the election as cover and not a “stolen election” as the morons in the media and this administration think it is.

elduende on June 14, 2009 at 8:35 PM

My God what a mess. I wonder if this is the Obama effect they were all talking about.

Terrye on June 14, 2009 at 8:35 PM

Time to start setting some preconditions.

Jim Treacher on June 14, 2009 at 8:35 PM

I’ll go out on a limb (not really) and boldly predict that tomorrow morning Barry will issue a statement deploring the violence and urging all sides to exercise restraint.

AZCoyote on June 14, 2009 at 8:36 PM

Wonder if that’s part of the ‘healthy debate’ Obama was talking about?

GarandFan on June 14, 2009 at 8:15 PM

When Odumbo said that, I couldn’t believe what I heard. I was like when the hell have they ever openly talk about anything except extermination of American and the Jeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeew’s

Lisa on June 14, 2009 at 8:37 PM

elduende on June 14, 2009 at 8:35 PM

Given their role in training them, there may just always happen to be a large number available at anytime…

TheBigOldDog on June 14, 2009 at 8:37 PM

Time to start setting some preconditions.

Well, if he’s going to throw Ahmadinejad under the bus, now you’re talking.

Yeah, yeah, the “under the bus” line has just about had it.

SteveMG on June 14, 2009 at 8:37 PM

Obama can’t comment now, he doesn’t know which side of this robust debate to come down on yet. And it appears the debate just keeps getting more “robust”. Twitterfall is fascinating. TKS for the tip AP.

califdreamnred on June 14, 2009 at 8:38 PM

Speak out Obama and speak out clearly!

Do you side with the Iranian people or with a fellow power grabber?

MB4 on June 14, 2009 at 8:27 PM

Unfortunately, I think he sides with the latter. He seems to share the same traits. As do Pelosi, Reid, Dodd, Franks, Schumer. Sad days in America right now.

capejasmine on June 14, 2009 at 8:39 PM

Dinnerjacket will soon go on tv and say this is all just a distraction from the important work that he needs to do. Then he will take a few of his wives to see a Broadway show.

pedestrian on June 14, 2009 at 8:39 PM

Time to start setting some preconditions.

Jim Treacher on June 14, 2009 at 8:35 PM

Why? Obama’s cool. The US cannot be arrogant and judge this kind of thing anymore. Different strokes for different folks after all.

AUINSC on June 14, 2009 at 8:39 PM

This is like a traffic problem, you see? People coming from a soccer match, then they run a stop sign, blah, blah, blah…

Johnson on June 14, 2009 at 8:39 PM

TheBigOldDog on June 14, 2009 at 8:37 PM

Great point.

elduende on June 14, 2009 at 8:40 PM

Obama will send over ACORN to study how this second term victory was organized.

the_nile on June 14, 2009 at 8:40 PM

Thus the silence from our President.
And where the heck is he anyway?

SteveMG on June 14, 2009 at 8:27 PM

I think he’s waiting to express outrage over an abortionist being murdered by a right wing conspiracy, fostered by right wind talk radio haters.

Am I wrong, or are these kids being beaten and killed for a belief that Mousavi was going to bring “hopenchange”, when in reality he’d probably be just the same puppet that the Ayatollahs want?

TugboatPhil on June 14, 2009 at 8:40 PM

Time to start setting some preconditions.

Jim Treacher on June 14, 2009 at 8:35 PM

Preconditions disappeared. Just like the W’s on the keyboards.

sybilll on June 14, 2009 at 8:41 PM

Obama can’t comment now, he doesn’t know which side of this robust debate to come down on yet. And it appears the debate just keeps getting more “robust”. Twitterfall is fascinating. TKS for the tip AP.

califdreamnred on June 14, 2009 at 8:38 PM

That is so the truth! It takes him ages to decide what to say on things!

Alana on June 14, 2009 at 8:42 PM

This is like a traffic problem, you see? People coming from a soccer match, then they run a stop sign, blah, blah, blah…

Johnson on June 14, 2009 at 8:39 PM

And then another guy gets run over by a bus.

It’s all traffic problems.

the_nile on June 14, 2009 at 8:43 PM

TugboatPhil on June 14, 2009 at 8:40 PM

That’s the sickest cruelest irony in this whole thing. Mousavi was selected by the mullahs to run. He’s a creature of the Islamic revolution and a nasty customer in his own right.

elduende on June 14, 2009 at 8:43 PM

Obama really can’t speak out about it because he may have to do the same thing one day…though, it would be with a very heavy heart, of course.

AUINSC on June 14, 2009 at 8:43 PM

Quick! Malia…do something “cute” so the media can cover it!

SouthernGent on June 14, 2009 at 8:44 PM

Speak out Obama and speak out clearly!

Do you side with the Iranian people or with a fellow power grabber?

MB4 on June 14, 2009 at 8:27 PM

I second this motion.

The American people don’t remain silent or equivocate when we witness ruthless brutality by tyrants against their own people.

Why are you silent, President Obama?
Why does your administration equivocate, President Obama?
Whose side are you on, President Obama?

Loxodonta on June 14, 2009 at 8:44 PM

AUINSC on June 14, 2009 at 8:43 PM

Yes, and it will be how he doesn’t WANT to do it, but he has to do it.

Alana on June 14, 2009 at 8:44 PM

I am reluctant to post on this subject because I don’t think I could be more confused. On CNN this afternoon their experts (as good as any other experts I guess) said that the Supreme Council is split as is the military, with supports of both candidates in their ranks. Paranoia is probably in abundant supply in Iran.

Cindy Munford on June 14, 2009 at 8:46 PM

Obama will send over ACORN to study how this second term victory was organized.

the_nile on June 14, 2009 at 8:40 PM

Funny how they think we have problems. The left is deranged.

And yes I know you are being sarcastic but it is not a bad idea.

CWforFreedom on June 14, 2009 at 8:46 PM

That’s Obama’s idea of healthy debate, ACORN style.

BottomLine5 on June 14, 2009 at 8:46 PM

Obama really can’t speak out about it because he may have to do the same thing one day…though, it would be with a very heavy heart, of course.

AUINSC on June 14, 2009 at 8:43 PM

Sometimes it takes a robust debate to convince people you’re right, you give them an offer they wont refuse.
Just community organizing the Chicago way.

the_nile on June 14, 2009 at 8:47 PM

Speak out Obama and speak out clearly!

Do you side with the Iranian people or with a fellow power grabber?

MB4 on June 14, 2009 at 8:27 PM

Ha! But of course if he does speak out he will be admitting that his original policy towards Iran was a failure and it will indict his whole foreign policy approach. No doubt his sycophants are trying to figure out a way where he can have it both ways and he can’t. The mullahs have made a play that has cornered him.

Obama’s Iran policy is in tatters tonight.

elduende on June 14, 2009 at 8:47 PM

I am reluctant to post on this subject because I don’t think I could be more confused. On CNN this afternoon their experts (as good as any other experts I guess) said that the Supreme Council is split as is the military, with supports of both candidates in their ranks. Paranoia is probably in abundant supply in Iran.

Cindy Munford on June 14, 2009 at 8:46 PM

Hopefully it opens doors for Israel.

the_nile on June 14, 2009 at 8:48 PM

That’s Obama’s idea of healthy debate, ACORN style.

BottomLine5 on June 14, 2009 at 8:46 PM

Perfect!

This is Obama’s idea of a ‘healthy debate’. He said so.

AUINSC on June 14, 2009 at 8:48 PM

AP you keep looking at this as if they are a government for the long term. They believe all they have to do is hang on till they get their nuclear weapons and then bring about apocalypse.

Jdripper on June 14, 2009 at 8:48 PM

Meanwhile, after devoting a few hard hours of thought to it since my last post, I’m more puzzled than ever as to why Khamenei would side with Ahmadinejad by endorsing such patently fraudulent results. How does the benefit to him outweigh the cost?

What cost?

Jim Treacher on June 14, 2009 at 8:49 PM

I’m more puzzled than ever as to why Khamenei would side with Ahmadinejad by endorsing such patently fraudulent results.

Are they patently fraudulent? Nothing I’ve read so far has struck me as particularly convincing. I respect your opinion. Please explain why you’re convinced this election was stolen.

Infidoll on June 14, 2009 at 8:49 PM

Those death squads are “robust”

mjbrooks3 on June 14, 2009 at 8:49 PM

As to where our new fearless leader is and what his statement will be…….It’s been my belief that he held his statement on the death of the soldier at the recruiting center because it happened before his great speech to the Muslim World and he was afraid to ruffle feathers. Since I don’t think as highly of his intelligence as the MSM I think he’s trying to figure if he should sh!t or go blind right about now.

Cindy Munford on June 14, 2009 at 8:50 PM

Doesnt look like the Persians are gonna settle down on this one. Maybe we could loan them 300 Geeks.

faol on June 14, 2009 at 8:50 PM

It 1937,crap,I mean 1979,double crap,

I mean 2009,and the Brown shirts are

running amuck,clean-up if you

will,of enforcing Hope and Change!(Sarc)
—————————————

Kinda looks like what the,

‘Civilian National Security Forces’

would be envolved in!!!Ahem.

canopfor on June 14, 2009 at 8:50 PM

Ahmadinejad’s smirking response: “We won.”

ReagansRight on June 14, 2009 at 8:51 PM

The Iranians know Obama will make things worse for them in many ways and especially by legitimizing Ahmadinejad.
They may see this as their last chance for revolution.

katy on June 14, 2009 at 8:52 PM

That is so the truth! It takes him ages to decide what to say on things!

Alana on June 14, 2009 at 8:42 PM

C’mon now. He’s very busy picking out his tie, kerchief, sock combo for tomorrow. LOL

capejasmine on June 14, 2009 at 8:52 PM

Cindy Munford on June 14, 2009 at 8:46 PM

Cindy these so called experts a) don’t live there b) have an agenda c)are really clueless with regards to what is going on because you’ll notice this administration has been caught flatfooted in the worst way and they have the cash and time and buildings filled with intelligence people that get paid to “analyze” and know this stuff. They didn’t and that’s why Obama’s Iran policy is in ruins tonite.

elduende on June 14, 2009 at 8:52 PM

Iran’s citizenry needs a Second Amendment.
Or a vigorous introduction of smuggled arms.

Mister Ghost on June 14, 2009 at 8:21 PM

Time for a little Israeli influence?

Benjamin9 on June 14, 2009 at 8:53 PM

the_nile on June 14, 2009 at 8:48 PM

In my favorite spy world the Israelis, knowing where the nuclear facilities are, will take this opportunity to blow to hell. Then if could forever be thought to be an inside job and another reaction to the rigged election. I live to dream and then Iran can have it’s own Truthers, which as we know all societies are better for.

Cindy Munford on June 14, 2009 at 8:53 PM

If you wonder why Obama wants gun control – this is why !! Never (even tho I don’t have a gun)

HerseyK on June 14, 2009 at 8:53 PM

I wonder what the proper Liberal term
would be,so that its easier for a lefty
to watch said video,and have a good sleep!

A Political Opponent Abortion maybe,

or Man Made on Man Political Disaster!

canopfor on June 14, 2009 at 8:54 PM

This is why Obama wants GUN CONTROL and why NEVER !!

(and I don’t have gun )

HerseyK on June 14, 2009 at 8:55 PM

Our glorious president Barack Hussien Obama from the temple of “God damn America” can surely be a calming factor in this political agitation between his fellow anti-American & anti-Semites.

Teebone3 on June 14, 2009 at 8:55 PM

This is another reason why, among a hundred-and-one other reasons, we simply can’t allow these unstable regimes to acquire nuclear weapons.

Succession problems, instability, et cetera.

It is so easy for Chris Matthews in particular to advocate doing nothing. Doing nothing about Iraq, about Iran and on and on….

The “We’ll just respond if they attack” or “They’ll never risk destruction” arguments are useless.

SteveMG on June 14, 2009 at 8:55 PM

Bambi is too busy getting ready for his AMA speech Monday. Since most DR’s would seem to be more intelligent than the mass of Yobamamanics he has to rehearse how to tell them he is putting them out of business without them realizing it.

faol on June 14, 2009 at 8:55 PM

What cost?

Jim Treacher on June 14, 2009 at 8:49 PM

There aren’t enough cells in the country to hold all the dissenters. So, I guess that brutal suppression, terrorist tactics and summary executions will take place. There will be significant disruption within the academic and professional sectors, that may cost the whole economy dearly.

But, as long as the mullahs maintain power, these are insignificant costs to them. For, other than their own lives, power and comfort, what costs are too high for brutal tyrants?

Loxodonta on June 14, 2009 at 8:56 PM

Cindy Munford on June 14, 2009 at 8:50 PM

Perhaps he’s holding off to make sure he doesn’t make the same mistake he made during the Georgian/Russian conflict last fall.
After all there arewosides to every conflict… on the other hand….both sides need to show restraint….on the other hand…

katy on June 14, 2009 at 8:56 PM

are two sides =After all there arewosides

katy on June 14, 2009 at 8:57 PM

I’m more puzzled than ever as to why Khamenei would side with Ahmadinejad by endorsing such patently fraudulent results. How does the benefit to him outweigh the cost?

AP,
I am not sure that the premise of your question is entirely on-target. You are projecting Western cost-benefit analysis on a regime that clearly does not think in Western terms of political calculation. For me, the more pressing and germane questions are: With all of the attention of the world being brought to bear on Iran currently, what will Iran do to avert the eyes of the world? Will they influence Kim Jong-Il to do more than saber rattle? Will they order Hezbollah to attack Israel? Will they cause some sort of distraction in Iraq? These are important because the now agitated energies of Iranian youth could easily be turned in a nationalistic sense toward the West. They may choose to blame the West (including Israel) of tampering, collusion, or both. This may have the effect of solidifying an entire or at least a majority of the population against a common enemy and, to turn a phrase, kick the domestic strife can down the road.

alohapundit on June 14, 2009 at 8:57 PM

I wonder what these brave Iranian students would think of their “inspiration” Obama if they knew he considers them an “unfortunate distraction” from his plan to socialize medicine and get Sotomayor confirmed?

elduende on June 14, 2009 at 8:58 PM

Obama will send over ACORN to study how this second term victory was organized.

the_nile on June 14, 2009 at 8:40 PM

I was thinking the same thing. Obama is probably jealous that someone else can agitate crowds better than he can.

Felonious Monk on June 14, 2009 at 8:58 PM

elduende on June 14, 2009 at 8:52 PM

Although I am sure that everything you are saying is absolutely true, I must in fairness point out that these weren’t government “experts” in case I gave the wrong impression. I can’t find his name but they have a gentleman from the Mid-East that has a show on Sunday. The only high point in this whole mess for me is that yesterday Mr. Obama was almost bragging about the hopeychangey thing he had brought with his speech.

Cindy Munford on June 14, 2009 at 8:58 PM

AP; you are wrong, of course!

“where you’ll find the Basij — essentially Iran’s answer to the Nazi SA..”

Actally, the “Basij” are Iran’s answer to Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s (PBUH)(SWT)(SAW) ACORN/Americorps…..

Dale in Atlanta on June 14, 2009 at 9:01 PM

katy on June 14, 2009 at 8:56 PM

So far I can think of a single idea he has had, foreign or domestic, that I have thought was good. And considering the outcomes I am sticking with my instincts that he is clueless. Now if only he would realize it, the world would be a better place.

Cindy Munford on June 14, 2009 at 9:01 PM

The only high point in this whole mess for me is that yesterday Mr. Obama was almost bragging about the hopeychangey thing he had brought with his speech.

Cindy Munford on June 14, 2009 at 8:58 PM

He’s simply doing what he normally does…covering his a$$ from both directions.

AUINSC on June 14, 2009 at 9:02 PM

And Obama wants to talk to these bastards.

thmcbb on June 14, 2009 at 9:03 PM

Cindy Munford on June 14, 2009 at 8:58 PM

No I understood your point but the gentleman you are thinking about is named Fareed Zakaria and is an active supporter of Obama. So look at anything said on his show from the prism that it will cheerlead for Obama. They are busy trying to put lipstick on this pig and there is no way to do it without impugning Obama’s original Iran policy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fareed_Zakaria

elduende on June 14, 2009 at 9:04 PM

The only high point in this whole mess for me is that yesterday Mr. Obama was almost bragging about the hopeychangey thing he had brought with his speech.

Cindy Munford on June 14, 2009 at 8:58 PM

There was one other: Joe Biden, today.

Together, these two demonstrate just how narcissistically Obamacentric and incompetent this administration’s foreign policy has become.

Smart power indeed.

Loxodonta on June 14, 2009 at 9:04 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3