At the brink: Ahmadinejad refuses to guarantee Mousavi’s safety
posted at 1:45 pm on June 14, 2009 by Allahpundit
In which Christiane Amanpour singlehandedly earns back some of the credibility lost in CNN’s news vacuum last night. There’s a print article about this at CNN.com too but the clip really must be seen to be believed. I can’t tell if it’s just a poor translation or a particularly eccentric example of Ahmadine-speak, but he’s so disjointed as to be almost incoherent. In fact, between this and his surreal dismissal of the growing street protests as “not important,” I wonder if the strain’s made him go goofy. Steve Clemons’s Iranian source predicted that Dinnerjacket would try to have Mousavi and Rafsanjani killed, but it’s one thing to eliminate your opponents and another thing to taunt millions of their outraged supporters by hinting about it on TV. Is this nut trying to provoke a civil war or has he finally gone completely around the bend?
I’m doing my best to stay on top of the Iran story in Headlines — the very latest is Mousavi formally calling for the election results to be voided — but honestly, it’s moving too fast even for that format. Your best bet is Twitter; see, e.g., this report of Arabic-speaking Iranian security forces now on patrol, the first of its kind that I’ve spotted anywhere. If you don’t want to sign up and follow the dispatches from Iranians in the streets, that’s okay: Just go here and keep refreshing or, if you’d rather have updates streamed to you, go to Twitterfall and check the box for #iranelection in the left-hand sidebar. (If it isn’t there when you read this, type #iranelection in the custom field and check the box there.) If you’re already on Twitter and looking for Iranians to follow, I recommend Change_for_Iran, StopAhmadi, iran09, TehranBureau, alirezasha, and jimsciuttoABC. There are others, of course; if you know of any good ones, share in the comments.
Before you watch, ponder a good question asked by a commenter in Headlines: Why is Khamenei so invested in an Ahmadinejad victory, especially if, as we’re forever being told, he holds the ultimate power to set policy in Iran? Mousavi’s no secularist or squish; he’s basically Ahmadinejad lite, duly vetted and approved by Iran’s Guardian Council as Islamic enough to lead the country. The New Yorker theorizes that Khamenei got nervous about how much youth support Mousavi was getting and decided to torpedo him lest he bring some fundie version of Hopenchange to the presidency. But why would Khamenei worry about that when the regime did such an effective job of containing Khatami’s reformist agenda 10 years ago? The safe play would have been to appease the kids by crowning Mousavi the winner, enacting a few token reforms, and then muddling along with the nuke kabuki until they have the bomb. Instead, he validated an electoral sham so brazen that it has the country inching towards revolution. Why? Occam’s Razor suggests that this is a true coup, with Ahmadinejad rigging the results himself and then somehow forcing Khamenei to bless them. But how could he manage that? What’s really going on here?
Exit question: How soon before Hezbollah and Hamas are ordered to attack Israel to distract the Iranian masses?










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 3 … 6 Next »
never fear: the nytimes, CNN, and msnbc are busy reporting about palin-letterman, the white house dog, and “who is the leader of the GOP?”.
Newsweek’s zakaria declared this week that Iran REALLY only wants nukes for electricity
Anything to keep the focus off of our “cool” leader’s indecision and weakness. Good thing you talked to Iran, Barry!!
battleoflepanto1571 on June 14, 2009 at 1:51 PM
This guy is whacked out…..If I lived in Israel I would be very very nervous!!!!!
marktarheel on June 14, 2009 at 1:51 PM
they’re saying the paramilitaries on bikes that you keep seeing are arabs (hezbollah arabs) brought in to do “what persian cops wouldn’t do”. everything’s a mess over there, lord knows who’s actually got control. if ahmadinejad really has control, will the whole army go along?
ernesto on June 14, 2009 at 1:52 PM
Huh? This is … silly.
BTW, Achmadhdhjad’s inability to guarantee Mousavi’s safety sounds just like The Precedent’s inability to guarantee that we wouldn’t have savage, third-world “truth commissions”, here, in order to jail the last administration.
progressoverpeace on June 14, 2009 at 1:55 PM
Personally, I think he’s doing exactly what he intended to do with regard to stoking public outrage. I think he wants it. I think he needs it.
Weight of Glory on June 14, 2009 at 1:55 PM
This is AWESOME coverage AP. Thanks for all the hard work.
John the Libertarian on June 14, 2009 at 1:56 PM
If I lived in Iran I would be even more nervous.
doriangrey on June 14, 2009 at 1:56 PM
Is i said in headlines comments, there may be no true coup against the Ayatollahs.
Rev. Guards were always the real power behind Islamic revolution, not the clerical counsil, and A-jad is in control, or at least in great favor of the Guards. Iran may in fact be military dictatorship, not theocracy. Just like NK.
Aristotle on June 14, 2009 at 1:56 PM
Schieffer & Stephanopolous both led off with Obamacare this morning. Schieffer didn’t talk about Iran *at all*, and George only got around to it very late, as one of several round table points.
Purple Fury on June 14, 2009 at 1:56 PM
And thank you for that, AP. The Press has just simply dropped the ball on this, and it is embarrassing.
Weight of Glory on June 14, 2009 at 1:57 PM
“Traffic rules”??????
W. T. F. is he talking about?
Purple Fury on June 14, 2009 at 1:57 PM
Props to Allah for the mini-twitter tutorial, too. I wasn’t even aware of the other wrapper apps that sit on top of twitter or the channels.
Thanks, PF
Purple Fury on June 14, 2009 at 1:58 PM
Yep I reckon that will be dinnerjackets next play. Either that or try and provoke some sort of incident in the gulf or Iraq.
Dreadnought223 on June 14, 2009 at 1:59 PM
Brit Hume is discussing this on FoxNews right now, and talking about the potential threat to Israel.
doriangrey on June 14, 2009 at 1:59 PM
I blame the left!
They are the cause of all those people who only wanted a free election getting killed.
They are the one’s who invite that dictator to speak in this country. They are the ones who allowed him to give the annual rebuttal to the Christmas Day Speech by the Queen on television.
Blake on June 14, 2009 at 2:03 PM
Bingo. He’s going to need an “Israeli” whipping boy.
Weight of Glory on June 14, 2009 at 2:04 PM
He’s a twittering maniac these days.
Blake on June 14, 2009 at 2:05 PM
Yeah, a coup! The War on WTF is doubly over! Iranian Muslims wont stand for having their democracy played with. Islam invented Democracy, did you know that?
BL@KBIRD on June 14, 2009 at 2:05 PM
His formal education is a PhD in traffic management. I kid you not.
keep the change on June 14, 2009 at 2:06 PM
Oh, and Netanyahu’s speech in less than one hour.
Blake on June 14, 2009 at 2:06 PM
He can’t tell a straight truth. It would be fatal to him.
Dr. Manhattan on June 14, 2009 at 2:07 PM
Iminthemoodfor Abigwhompinjihad is learning from our own Dear Leader……. and our “man” at 1600 is learning from every dictatorial power-mad maniac on the planet.
Why is anybody surprised at anything now ?
Cheers !
Kenny
Locked and loaded in South Flori-duh.
E T Cartman on June 14, 2009 at 2:07 PM
As soon as he has nukes, he is going to give Israel an f’n speeding ticket…
tommylotto on June 14, 2009 at 2:08 PM
Really, can a such a pedestrian looking man in a white Members Only jacket be so diabolical?
I guess so.
splink on June 14, 2009 at 2:08 PM
I thought I just saw on FOX that he finished his speech about thirty mins. ago. Is there another speech coming?
Weight of Glory on June 14, 2009 at 2:08 PM
Ahmadinejad is deliberately provoking the opposition so that it provides him with a pretext for a purge. The deliberately brazen nature of his behaviour is accentuated by his chief character flaws, megalomania and sadism.
Khamenei is in full agreement with Ahmadinejad and they are pursuing a very succesful political strategy: gradually increasing the extremism of their policies while demonstrating the impotence of the opposition. They aim to secure the regime by breaking their opponents’ will to resist. This they intend to achieve through demonstrations of the regime’s capacity for extremism, rather than extremist action itself.
Having intimidated the domestic opposition, Ahmadinejad and Khamenei will set about destroying Israel by means of a forced demographic collapse. This will be achieved by forcing Jews to immigrate thorugh fear of terrorist attacks and an implied nuclear threat, while securing the ‘right of return’ for Arabs. Success in this endeavour is overwhelmingly likely.
Archibald L on June 14, 2009 at 2:08 PM
Several possibilities:
Obama has reactivated the CIA and they’re destabilizing Iran. (Yeah I don’t believe that either)
Obama has clandestinely forged a pact with Mousavi (or Khameni thinks he has) and Khameni is adamant about not letting that progress.
Khameni and Ahmadinejad are deliberately trying to destablize Iran to weed out the opposition elements to forge a more “pure” Iran to pave the way for Allah… (Not AP)
I’m a little concerned that I can’t seem to logically rule out #3…
Skywise on June 14, 2009 at 2:11 PM
Maybe Amadinejad has spent his time in power effectively taking over the Revolutionary Guard. If they really function as Iran’s version of the Praetorian Guard, then if Amadinejad has them, the he has the power. He certainly has been their best friend.
AUINSC on June 14, 2009 at 2:12 PM
Everything about this election has been so blatant in its theft, I’m not surprised he is crowing about it to reporters now. I’m inclined to think he’s bluffing, but unfortunately it’s an effective bluff.
Realistically I don’t expect the rest of the world leaders to speak up, since Ahmadinejad would only use it to further rally his base, but shame on the media for ignoring this story or trying to turn it into another finger pointing game among Washington DCers. Look at the difference in coverage between us and them and wonder, how can they sit around and pat themselves on the back for being such journalistic heroes and feel sorry that those nasty bloggers are taking their ad money? I mean, how clueless are they?
Siobhan on June 14, 2009 at 2:12 PM
Agreed. Seems like we’ve got a lot of people proposing lots of theories based on lots of conjecture, a smattering of anecdotes, and not a whole of information.
I’m thinking Twitter may be a disease – an exponentiation of the “first reports” problem, multiplied by rumor-mongering, with high incentives to oversimplify and exaggerate, and zero opportunity to test the source. It makes the regular ol’ internet look reliable by comparison.
CK MacLeod on June 14, 2009 at 2:12 PM
It’s an analogy. In other words, if Mousavi “breaks the rules” (whatever they decide that means), the authorities will punish him just like any other ordinary citizen. So, if Mousavi gets too far out of line, trump up some charge of treason, arrest him, death sentence, etc. Hey, he broke the law, he’s held accountable just like anyone else, and Dinnerjacket is still everyone’s friend.
infidel4life on June 14, 2009 at 2:12 PM
I went from completely ignoring this to reading everything that comes down about it.
This sure has turned interesting.
I wonder if the Iranian people have been inspired by what is going on in Iraq? I mean, aside of our torturing people, murdering women and eating babies, maybe some good has come of it after all, and the Iranians see that.
Perhaps they’re at the end of the rope in living under tyrrany. Who woulda thunk that, huh?
12thMonkey on June 14, 2009 at 2:12 PM
Follow this twitter from Iran. He is in the middle of some of the police clashes and activity in the streets.
http://twitter.com/Change_for_Iran
katy on June 14, 2009 at 2:12 PM
I thought the New Yorker’s author’s name sounded familiar:
Iran’s George W. Bush
by Laura Secor
Can anyone beat Ahmadinejad in this week’s election?
Post Date Monday, June 8, 2009
hmph
tru2tx on June 14, 2009 at 2:13 PM
Struggle for power between Raf and Khameini
blatantblue on June 14, 2009 at 2:13 PM
Yup. Use the crisis to flush out the “dissidents”. Then once the “purging”, both within the government and without, is finished, they will need something to “unify” and “heal” the rest around an external issue, to draw attention away from home and towards a common enemy. Which is why AP’s Exit question is spot on. Should we be looking for a “Night of the Long Knives” moment soon?
Weight of Glory on June 14, 2009 at 2:14 PM
OOps sorry, Didn’t read this twitter source was mentioned in the post.
katy on June 14, 2009 at 2:15 PM
I’ve been watching the #Iranelection channel over at Twitter all night and morning and I can tell you this begins to sound eerily like what happens in other countries before a bloody put-down by the military/police, or an outright take-down of the government. I heartily second Allahpundit’s suggestion above to stay tuned to Twitter because any other media channel/outlet you get into is way, way behind the story on the ground.
Check my blog out
mncons72 on June 14, 2009 at 2:15 PM
I’m 100% sure that change for Iran and stopping Ahmadinejad would be good things, but I don’t think I’d be going to those two for unbiased reporting.
CK MacLeod on June 14, 2009 at 2:15 PM
I’m with you except for that.
Ahmadinejad is going “all in” to keep power… You don’t bluff like this with your own people only to fight a war of “attrition” with Israel.
Skywise on June 14, 2009 at 2:16 PM
If we had a POTUS A Team, what would the A team be doing to help topple Iran’s theocracy. Will someone please come out and agree with me that Bush’s vision of a democratic Iraq is heavily influencing democratic yearnings in Iran. Why else would Iran have arranged such fierce terror tactics to keep Iraq from stabilizing.
.
Grown-ups like Bush/Cheney might be reinforcing troups in Iraq and announcing that any attack on Israel is an attack on the US. They would also signal with words, money and action that the US will support a democratic movement in Iran. Alas, we don’t have grown-ups in office that can see this as a huge opportunity to marginalize the Iranian radicals in power.
Mark30339 on June 14, 2009 at 2:17 PM
Oh, and yeah…
No reason for the Iranians not to have nuclear technology, right?
12thMonkey on June 14, 2009 at 2:18 PM
Nightmare scenario?
Simultaneous nuke attack on Israel from Iran and North Korea on the US, Venezuela shuts off oil supplies to the US, China steps in to “keep the peace” and Russia keeps the UK in check…
Skywise on June 14, 2009 at 2:19 PM
End of the week. I’d say after Friday sermons, er, instructions, and prayers.
Dr.Cwac.Cwac on June 14, 2009 at 2:19 PM
To Allahpundit
The AP who’s better then the AP
Defector01 on June 14, 2009 at 2:20 PM
Maybe Ahmadinejad has the Revolutionary Guard on his side. Not even Khamenei can ignore them. This might be a military coup. I can not imagine why else they would keep Ahmadinejad around. He has not done them any favors in the past.
Terrye on June 14, 2009 at 2:21 PM
It may not be very comfortable to “win” under these circumstances, not knowing if the Mullahs are really behind you and having to think about public reaction. Personal safety questions can’t be ignored even in a tightly ordered police state.
Cindy Munford on June 14, 2009 at 2:22 PM
And I don’t think an attack on Israel would distract the Iranian masses. They have other things on their minds right now, like what is happening right in front of them.
Terrye on June 14, 2009 at 2:22 PM
Why not replace puppet Dinnerjacket with puppet Mousavi? Balance pleasing Irans teenage hippity hopping twitterbugs or appear to remove Dinnerjacket so the world sees Iran as weak and compliant to world opinion as America is?
Making it obvious to the west that the election was foregone only reinforces that “f*ck you” quality of international diplomacy in it’s message.
BL@KBIRD on June 14, 2009 at 2:23 PM
I wonder how many friends Raf has in the Majlis
blatantblue on June 14, 2009 at 2:23 PM
Ugh! That’s a happy thought!
Weight of Glory on June 14, 2009 at 2:23 PM
Has anyone heard what BHO’s take on this is?
farright on June 14, 2009 at 2:24 PM
No the attack on Israel occurs AFTER a successful crackdown here. (If this is just cover for a purge of dissenters)
Skywise on June 14, 2009 at 2:24 PM
The most insane thing about this whole situation is that the Obama administration is planning to ‘talk’ to Dinnerjacket no matter what!!!
It makes sense I guess. The more chaotic the world is, the more excuses Obama has to consolidate executive power. That’s what he wants. Power.
Lance Murdock on June 14, 2009 at 2:24 PM
thanks for your great coverage and for the twitterfall tip, AP!
homesickamerican on June 14, 2009 at 2:25 PM
Methinks you’ve read one to many Tom Clancy novels.
BallisticBob on June 14, 2009 at 2:26 PM
If this doesn’t settle down by the end of the week don’t be surprised of a Hezbollah attack soon after. Hezbollah needs Iran to stay in power.
Lance Murdock on June 14, 2009 at 2:29 PM
The Iranians have employed an Arab brute squad of Lebanese and Palestinians for years. This is not a new development.
Mike Honcho on June 14, 2009 at 2:30 PM
What little Obama has said is typically confused, weak and yet self-aggrandizing:
http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/06/13/the-iranian-elections-and-the-loser-in-chief/
His Rosegarden statement from the above link:
On the one hand, he seems to be OK with whatever DinnerJacket does to stay in power…on the other hand, he seems to think his Cairo speech may have triggered the opposition and that Mousavi may be modeled on him and his hopenchange.
AUINSC on June 14, 2009 at 2:32 PM
Or more likely – dying under tyranny at the end of a rope.
when you have nothing to lose but your life then fighting for it is worthwhile.
izoneguy on June 14, 2009 at 2:32 PM
Just watched Bibi live on Fox live feed. If I had to guess Imadinnerjacket was kept because Bibi just handed Obama his head on a platter, and IF a moderate the youth supported was elected as “supreme leader”, (who J.B. thinks is the ruler of Iran), then Iran could be in trouble and the radical beliefs to wipe Israel off the map would be endangered.
Bibi just proposed the PA would have to acknowledge Israel as a Jewish nation and not just a Jewish state, that the PA would have to demilitarize, and that he was not going to stop the settlements. All of which they will not agree to. He also asked for the PA to come to the table without pre-conditions, and for the Arabs to assume economic responsibilities for Palestine which would lead to less terrorism. I think the Likud party should like it, but who knows?
freeus on June 14, 2009 at 2:33 PM
I love how clueless the Kossacks are. They are so pathetic: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/6/14/742359/-Iran,-Elections-And-Obama
And evil.
Lance Murdock on June 14, 2009 at 2:35 PM
Kind of makes you wonder if the word from the White House to USPravda is, “just lead with healthcare but keep talk about Iran to a minimum.”
Anyone remember how fortuitous it was that the economy took a nose dive *gasp* just when McCain/Palin took the lead? How convenient that we were just focusing on the threats abroad when suddenly the markets tanked and we were “IN THE GREATEST ECOMONIC CRISIS SINCE THE GREAT DEPRESSION!!!!!”
Mommypundit on June 14, 2009 at 2:38 PM
Revolutionary Guard, which is now more & more in control of Iran & its institutions as well as the commanding heights of its economy. Ahmadinejad is their candidate, they are the only ones who could REALLY challenge the supreme leader through a coup using the military, nothing happens in Iran today that is not to the taste of the Rev. Guards..
The notion that these students could overthrow Iran seems highly dubious without a component to challenge the guards (internal or perhaps external), it makes for gripping headlines & tweets but sadly I believe no more, wish I am to be proved quite wrong.. But doubt that very much.
Nice job AP, you dominated the memeorandum imho with your post last night.
saus on June 14, 2009 at 2:40 PM
From Change for Iran…
Very NOT good.
And Dear Leader wants to ‘work’ with an Iran led by him…?
Yikes!
CPT. Charles on June 14, 2009 at 2:41 PM
I would agree that they are either Syrians or Lebanese. Their dialect of Arabic would probably give away where they are from. “Arabic” is very different from one region to another. They could even be henchmen of Sadr from Iraq.
Iraqi Arabic is different from Lebanese Arabic.
crosspatch on June 14, 2009 at 2:41 PM
Clearly Obama needs to talk with him more.
eforhan on June 14, 2009 at 2:41 PM
The leftys in the UK were overjoyed that the dinner jacket was claiming victory. Whey would Schieffer, Stephanopolous, and the rest of the MSM feel any differently? The last thing they want is for Obama to actually have to deal with a crisis.
Blake on June 14, 2009 at 2:43 PM
It’s much the same position Bibi had before his last Prime ministership. The problem is that it depends on many things that will never happen the way Bibi is envisaging. For instance, Bibi wants a Palestinian entity that does not have total control of the airspace (a key point of Bibi’s position form the 90′s and a reasonable sounding one), but that will never happen. The minute the Pals think they have enough control, they will petition the UN for status as a state, which they will get, and then the UN will just declare that the pal state has all the rights of any other state, including full air rights. That will spell an existential threat to Israel.
All of Bibi’s other ideas suffered from the same problem. They would just turn out to be broken promises (from the pals and the rest of the world) as we have seen happen for all these decades. The pals can never be counted on to be controlled by any document or agreement and the word of pals is absolutely worthless.
Bibi’s declaration to not expand existing settlements (other than building on existing land) also gave away far too much, for nothing. Bibi is trying to negotiate reasonably with the unreasonable (the pals, The Precedent, and the world) and that always has a bad end.
I liked the feeling behind his speech but found it wanting in its details and lack of realism.
progressoverpeace on June 14, 2009 at 2:43 PM
Yeah, he does sound whacked out. But no more so than usual. The man has clearly been a raving loon for years.
ProfessorMiao on June 14, 2009 at 2:46 PM
I think the supreme mullahs got caught by suprise by stating that wide of spread in the elections. Dinner jacket was going to win regardless but not by such a large margin. The social upheaval is a result of the margin. Neither candidate is in favor of peace, the only reform Mousey offered was women with exposed faces or economic opportunities.
fourdeucer on June 14, 2009 at 2:46 PM
That’s why he sees every problem as a traffic violation.
the_nile on June 14, 2009 at 2:48 PM
Unofficial news – [sources]- reports leaked results from [Iran’s] Interior Ministry:
Geezer on June 14, 2009 at 2:54 PM
That’s right up there with “There are no US tanks in Baghdad.”
Instead of Baghdad Bob, can we now call this guy Teheran Teddy?
JohnGalt23 on June 14, 2009 at 2:55 PM
This Q&A clip’s funny. Ahmadinejad must think he’s doing stand-up comedy. Or, his teleprompter that good!
ConScribe on June 14, 2009 at 2:57 PM
“Teheran Teddy”
full of win!
Buckaroo on June 14, 2009 at 2:59 PM
Watershed event for Twitter…..
TheBigOldDog on June 14, 2009 at 2:59 PM
“ConScribe on June 14, 2009 at 2:57 PM”
zero has ‘prompter envy now …
:-)
Buckaroo on June 14, 2009 at 2:59 PM
That’s the point. If the palis are never going to honor any agreement, there is no sense for Israel to commit to anything.
Blake on June 14, 2009 at 3:00 PM
“TheBigOldDog on June 14, 2009 at 2:59 PM”
yep — at a minimum, kills the “is twitter dying?” stories for at least a few weeks …
[!!]
Buckaroo on June 14, 2009 at 3:01 PM
NBC offices in Tehran raided, cameras and Equipment confiscated. BBC told to get out Iran immediately. Cell/internet shut down
TheBigOldDog on June 14, 2009 at 3:01 PM
Angry calls from Iranian authorities to Twitter. Block function not working. http://tr.im/osWV #IranElection
TheBigOldDog on June 14, 2009 at 3:02 PM
Election day, on one of the news reports they should all these women waiting in line to vote. However, they were all wearing the big black trash bags. I thought Iran was a bit more relaxed about it in that the women could wear the pants and the long tunic with a scarf.
Blake on June 14, 2009 at 3:03 PM
NBC offices in Tehran raided, cameras and Equipment confiscated. BBC told to get out Iran immediately. Cell/internet shut down
TheBigOldDog on June 14, 2009 at 3:01 PM
The broken clock thing.
artist on June 14, 2009 at 3:04 PM
“TheBigOldDog on June 14, 2009 at 3:02 PM”
betcha twitter shows way more stones that microsoft or yahoo here …
Buckaroo on June 14, 2009 at 3:04 PM
Thanks for the great coverage, AP!
Other good follows:
http://twitter.com/WOTN
http://twitter.com/jadi
http://twitter.com/azarnoush
jd nyc on June 14, 2009 at 3:05 PM
Anyone who thinks the mullahs and Ahmadhinjad didn’t take advantage of Obama’s weak Cairo speech is fooling themselves into delusion.
I put up some news on the diplomacy fall-out from this, such as it is. No surprise there. It will make things difficult for the US diplomatic efforts.
Nawwww…. Really??? Geez, the mainstream media must think we’re all a bunch of dumb hicks…
mncons72 on June 14, 2009 at 3:06 PM
What’s the name of that guy in the well again………?
Seven Percent Solution on June 14, 2009 at 3:06 PM
I think A-jad is saying that Mousavi was arrested for violating traffic rules, no? Minor pretense, off to the gulag.
I also think A-jad, the true believer, outfoxed the mullahs who care mostly about money these days. A-jad leads the other true believers in the government and military.
PattyJ on June 14, 2009 at 3:07 PM
I’ve found it’s a bit easier to keep up with at Twazzup’s Iran page if you’re not following directly on Twitter.
zerosheep on June 14, 2009 at 3:07 PM
Quick everyone raise their hands who feel more safe and secure now that the messiah is in the oval office.
Come on raise your hands. Just one hand. OK? Come on how about just a thumbs up? Anyone? Michelle how about a thumbs up for the messiah?
Hello?
Jdripper on June 14, 2009 at 3:08 PM
The Twitterfall is like drinking from a fire hydrant!
TheBigOldDog on June 14, 2009 at 3:09 PM
Look, the nut job has to go. He has repeatedly threatened Israel and has mangaged to run his nations economy into the ground. How much more can the nation take. That takes care of Obama, next post I will analyis Iran.
bigtexmex on June 14, 2009 at 3:11 PM
Its the Iranian version of the 1979 Solidarity protests.
When the Communists were called out as unfair by a LABOR union it really delegitimized their whole “We stand for the working man” spin.
Oddly that same year 1979 Iranian students stormed the American embassey and took hostages.
When the very people who put you in power turn against you then it delegitimizes you.
William Amos on June 14, 2009 at 3:12 PM
All it took was Jimmy Carter 2.0 (The bad patch version) to make us return to the bad days of 1979.I guess Hugo is the Nicaruagans of this era.
William Amos on June 14, 2009 at 3:13 PM
Thats a telling indicator… Ahmanutjob is losing control…
dogsoldier on June 14, 2009 at 3:13 PM
There’s a good interview over on “The Nation” suggesting that this is a
coup by Ahmadinejad against the mullahs.
I read elsewhere that Khamenei is somewhat more progressive than Ahmadinejad. The mullahs have all the power on paper but Mahmoud seems to have his fingers in all the right places through the revolutionary guard.
gh on June 14, 2009 at 3:14 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 3 … 6 Next »