Quotes of the day

posted at 9:30 pm on June 13, 2009 by Allahpundit

“I use this chance to honor the emotions of the nation of Iran and remind them that Iran, this sacred being, belongs to them and not to the fraudulent. It is you who should stay alert. The traitors to the nation’s vote have no fear if this house of Persians burns in flames. We will continue with our green wave of rationality that is inspired by our religious learnings and our love for prophet Mohammad and will confront the rampage of lies that has appeared and marked the image of our nation.”

***
“One man passing by told her, ‘You wrote Mousavi, they read Ahmadinejad!’ She responded: ‘They’re illiterate and need to learn reading.’

Then a man in a car moving in the other direction rolled down his window and shouted at her in anger, ‘You whore! Why are you creating conflict between people?’ A basiji (a member of the volunteer paramilitary aligned with Ahmadinejad) charged at her from nowhere with a metal rod and was about to beat her when he was held down and beaten himself by five or six men streaming out of nearby cars.

‘I mean, just look at this! If Ahmadinejad won 25 million votes, which they claim, we should be celebrating, right?’ an onlooker commented.”

***
“One employee of the Interior Ministry, which carried out the vote count, said the government had been preparing its fraud for weeks, purging anyone of doubtful loyalty and importing pliable staff members from around the country.

‘They didn’t rig the vote,’ claimed the man, who showed his ministry identification card but pleaded not to be named. ‘They didn’t even look at the vote. They just wrote the name and put the number in front of it.’”

***
“Washington now faces a newly fractured Iranian polity ruled by a leadership that is willing to jettison its own institutions and legitimacy in its determination to retain absolute control. That does not bode well for Iran’s capacity to undertake serious talks and eventually engage in historic concessions on its nuclear program and support for terrorism. Obama has to be prepared to move forward with diplomacy despite the wholesale setback for Iran’s limited democracy. In the wake of this disastrous election, opportunities for progress on engagement may unexpectedly present themselves. But he should do so in full awareness of the farce that has been perpetrated with this Ahmadinejad ‘landslide’ and of the seething frustration of so many Iranians.”

***
“From a reader: ‘My next door neighbor is an Iranian immigrant who came here in 1977. He just received a SAT phone call from his brother in Tehran who reports that the rooftops of nighttime Tehran are filled with people shouting ‘Allah O Akbar’ in protest of the government and election results. The last time he remembers this happening is in 1979 during the Revolution. Says the sound of tens of thousands on the rooftops is deafening right now.’ It’s almost four in the morning in Iran.”

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4

If Mousavi is as radical or more… than Ahmadinejad why are we, of all people, surprised.
We have a more free system to get information out than the Iranians and look how we were duped.

katy on June 13, 2009 at 10:33 PM

Yes. I stand corrected. We already had standing governmental structures. I should not have included us, just because of the word of “revolution”. We didn’t take over, but broke free. Thanks for the correction, Count.

progressoverpeace on June 13, 2009 at 10:27 PM

Glad to be of service.

Count to 10 on June 13, 2009 at 10:34 PM

blatantblue on June 13, 2009 at 10:33 PM

I believe the correct military term is FUBAR.

Cindy Munford on June 13, 2009 at 10:34 PM

The French revolution eventually did, albeit after decades of the Terror

Nothing good came from the the revolution. The Constitution of 1791 never took hold. It was the Napoleonic Code, the fiat of a military leader, years later, that made modern France what it is today, rather than a despotic left wing dictatorship. In fact, France reverted back to a monarchy on two separate occasions after the revolution. But this did not matter because the Napoleonic Code is what defined France then and now, not the Jacobin revolution.

keep the change on June 13, 2009 at 10:35 PM

I believe the correct military term is FUBAR.

Cindy Munford on June 13, 2009 at 10:34 PM

No disagreements here.

blatantblue on June 13, 2009 at 10:35 PM

Counting the votes would have delayed announcing the Dinner Jacket’s landslide until after people went to bed.
__________________________________________________________
Chavez steals the vote he lost in Venezuela. World does nothing while media is quiet

Mugabe steals the vote he lost in Zimbabwe World does nothing while media is quiet

Ahmedinajad steals the vote he lost in Iran World will do nothing while media is quiet.

Here is where we break the pattern:

Obama steals the vote he loses in 2010 and 2012 World does nothing while media is thrilled another 46 cover pages for Obama in Newsweek and Evan Thomas announces that he was wrong to doubt before but now knows Obama actually is God

KW64 on June 13, 2009 at 10:36 PM

I’m very concerned about the Iranian people. They deserve democracy and liberty with the hope that their dangerous culture will improve. However, I do understand that their culture is currently quite theocratic and radical and they are likely to vote for radical Islamics who will continue to threaten the region and possibly the world. And that includes the opposition leader, Mousavi.

So, continued pressure on Iran is essential. Yet, Obama is appeasing them. This is bad.

Loxodonta on June 13, 2009 at 10:37 PM

TheBigOldDog on June 13, 2009 at 10:28 PM

I think our new friend was/is saying, there is little difference and I agree…
I haven’t been there in more than 35 years…
The old and the very young should join and show the middle aged a%%holes the door to hell.

jerrytbg on June 13, 2009 at 10:39 PM

I think the freedom in Iraq does influence young people.

the_nile on June 13, 2009 at 10:39 PM

Loxodonta on June 13, 2009 at 10:37 PM

The whole structure needs to be gotten rid of
the majlis
the supreme ayat’allah
council
etc etc

blatantblue on June 13, 2009 at 10:39 PM

Cindy Munford on June 13, 2009 at 10:34 PM

I am shocked at that comment!

Loxodonta on June 13, 2009 at 10:40 PM

Maybe, maybe not – the assumption worldwide is that popular elections confer legitimacy, which is a main reason why Iran and other essentially undemocratic regimes go through the motions.

True. But we all know that this is just a kabuki dance. The fact that others confer legitimacy on these jokes is a big problem. A huge problem.

A new regime constituted in the wake of a legitimacy crisis would likely be more authentically democratic and more secular, or at least under great pressure to become so if it hoped to gain recognition, aid, etc.

Well, this I’m not so sure about. The UN will confer legitimacy on anything that hurts the West (which is one of the main dangers Israel has in playing footsie with the Palestinians). Of course, I consider the UN to be totally illegitimate, even from a theoretical view, so I am quite at odds with “the world” on much of this.

But I still don’t see democratic processes blooming after an internal revolution. Especially not in that part of the world. I, myself, would not want to be betting on that outcome.

In the meantime, an Iran in turmoil would likely be an Iran less able to project power regionally, more vulnerable to sabotage and other measures aimed at de-railing its nuclear program.

That’s true, and one of the arguments in favor. But an Iran in chaos also makes it more dangerous, like a wounded animal.

People often talk about setting groups against each other in the middle east, to keep them occupied. Many Israelis thought that having Fatah and Hamas going at each other was a good thing. I am not of that mind, as it is impossible to keep arab/persian/muslim violence contained. The losing parties always resort to hitting third parties (remember how international terrorism started in the 60′s and 70′s). People these days forget how international terrorism was originally defined – it wasn’t just targeting civilians (everyone does that) it was targeting uninvolved civilians. e.g. spraying gunfire in the Rome airport in order to get attention for their “cause”.

That said, there’s a long distance between angry people shouting from the rooftops or getting into scuffles with the cops and a true revolutionary situation, and Moussavi-ism would be a rather flimsy vehicle for a revolutionary movement. None of us here knows – and few over there may know – what the real potential of the situation is.

CK MacLeod on June 13, 2009 at 10:20 PM

Very true.

progressoverpeace on June 13, 2009 at 10:40 PM

It looks like the Iranians are going back to the polls.

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/06/followup-on-earlier-posts.html

Lance Murdock on June 13, 2009 at 10:40 PM

Lance Murdock on June 13, 2009 at 10:40 PM

Crazy.

BallisticBob on June 13, 2009 at 10:41 PM

Perfect time for Israel to take out nuke sites?

BPD on June 13, 2009 at 10:42 PM

keep the change on June 13, 2009 at 10:35 PM

And I would add that France is currently in their FIFTH republic!! Fifth!

progressoverpeace on June 13, 2009 at 10:42 PM

AP: Where’s Hot Air’s coverage. Why do need to go the Huffington Post for all the updates?

Lance Murdock on June 13, 2009 at 10:12 PM

Maybe Allah has a hot date tonight!

Laura in Maryland on June 13, 2009 at 10:42 PM

You’re right, it could be. But I tend to think people on the rooftops and open protest on the streets is never a good sign for the ruling class. I’ve always hoped and prayed the youth in that country would pull the trigger on those crazy mullahs.

John the Libertarian on June 13, 2009 at 9:51 PM

If only they had a trigger to pull they probably would’ve already done so.

I’m all for getting a private group together to purchase guns for the would be Iranian Resistance movement.

Chaz706 on June 13, 2009 at 10:42 PM

It looks like the Iranians are going back to the polls.

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/06/followup-on-earlier-posts.html

Lance Murdock on June 13, 2009 at 10:40 PM

n/m old post. sorry everyone.

Lance Murdock on June 13, 2009 at 10:43 PM

The whole structure needs to be gotten rid of
the majlis
the supreme ayat’allah
council
etc etc

blatantblue on June 13, 2009 at 10:39 PM

And then there is the slight problem of the compatibility of Islam, democracy, freedom, tolerance of diversity, peace.

There’s not a really great record of that.

Loxodonta on June 13, 2009 at 10:43 PM

Maybe Allah has a hot date tonight!

Laura in Maryland on June 13, 2009 at 10:42 PM

lolHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHA

.

blatantblue on June 13, 2009 at 10:44 PM

Maybe Allah has a hot date tonight!

Laura in Maryland on June 13, 2009 at 10:42 PM

Nah. He’s on Twitter right now.

If you want follow what’s going on in Iran right now follow this guy http://twitter.com/tehranelection

As of 2 hrs ago he shut down, for security purposes, hopefully he’ll be back online soon.

Lance Murdock on June 13, 2009 at 10:45 PM

Lance Murdock on June 13, 2009 at 10:40 PM

Wow…

katy on June 13, 2009 at 10:47 PM

Lance Murdock on June 13, 2009 at 10:45 PM

Thanks.

Laura in Maryland on June 13, 2009 at 10:48 PM

Maybe Allah has a hot date tonight!

Laura in Maryland on June 13, 2009 at 10:42 PM
Nah. He’s on Twitter right now.

AP twitters on dates…. It’s sad…

katy on June 13, 2009 at 10:48 PM

aawwwwlll these mothafckin councils

too many

blatantblue on June 13, 2009 at 10:49 PM

blatantblue on June 13, 2009 at 10:44 PM

A reminder:

everyone love each other

blatantblue on June 13, 2009 at 10:33 PM

Now kiss and make up.

Loxodonta on June 13, 2009 at 10:49 PM

Now kiss and make up.

Loxodonta on June 13, 2009 at 10:49 PM

hey — i can love allah and not think he can get a date at the same time :D

blatantblue on June 13, 2009 at 10:50 PM

Then a man in a car moving in the other direction rolled down his window and shouted at her in anger, ‘You whore! Why are you creating conflict between people?’ A basiji (a member of the volunteer paramilitary aligned with Ahmadinejad) charged at her from nowhere with a metal rod and was about to beat her when he was held down and beaten himself by five or six men streaming out of nearby cars.

ACORN, the New Black Panthers and the Obama DoJ would object to this why, exactly?

ddrintn on June 13, 2009 at 10:52 PM

man — farkin threads are slow tonight

blatantblue on June 13, 2009 at 10:52 PM

AP twitters on dates…. It’s sad…

katy on June 13, 2009 at 10:48 PM

Saddest part of the whole thing is that most of them are either married or have b/f’s.

Lance Murdock on June 13, 2009 at 10:52 PM

No, no revolution. Over the years I’ve watched these crazies do this a dozen or more times and nothing permanent ever comes of it.

rplat on June 13, 2009 at 10:52 PM

RoofTops of Dissent!

Sounds like a plan!

No matter how far you look,coast to coast,whatever State
you live in,

Roof Top Tea Partys,”Don’t tread on me Flags”,along
side Ole’Faithful,’Bars and Stars!(A bit Sarc).

canopfor on June 13, 2009 at 10:53 PM

Well, I can go to bed this evening thankful that I don’t live in Iran.

scalleywag on June 13, 2009 at 10:54 PM

This was a landslide for Mousavi.
They have lost control of the election.
The youth of Iran wanted change and the rulers have lost their grip.

There’s more to this than we will see. The British and Candadian press will have more than we will. Watch the foreign press.

katy on June 13, 2009 at 10:54 PM

Lance Murdock on June 13, 2009 at 10:52 PM

oooooo…. that is sad…. ;(

katy on June 13, 2009 at 10:56 PM

Well, I can go to bed this evening thankful that I don’t live in Iran.

scalleywag on June 13, 2009 at 10:54 PM

LOL

In our paper on campus we have the “Glad I Don’t Live There” feature — Iran has been one lol!

blatantblue on June 13, 2009 at 10:57 PM

threads are slow tonight

blatantblue on June 13, 2009 at 10:52 PM

I’ve noticed that as well.

And coincidentally, did you notice Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet on the side, getting ready to kiss?!!!

Loxodonta on June 13, 2009 at 10:57 PM

The Red Army took care of Mao’s little problem. The Revolutionary Guard will take care of Dinnerjacket’s. Daughters and wives will be first. Hostages for compliance.

Watch, kiddies, as the real boogeymen operate………

Limerick on June 13, 2009 at 10:57 PM

Loxodonta on June 13, 2009 at 10:57 PM

Well, most HA readers are actually doing something tonight!

blatantblue on June 13, 2009 at 10:57 PM

I still say Nuke ‘em. Blame the fallout on the reactors in place. This whole exercise of do they/don’t they/Mousavi/AbaDinnerJack is futile.

Even chickens moult once a year.

EZnSF on June 13, 2009 at 10:59 PM

Reinstalling the Pahlavis would be the best possibility. But we know that’s not going to happen.

progressoverpeace on June 13, 2009 at 10:30 PM

You’re right on that one. Having Moussavi as ‘president’ would be worse off for Israel since this Anti-Semite hides his hatred for Jews and Israel better than Dinnerjacket. Plus having him as pres would give the West all the more reason to give Iran more time in ‘negotiations.’ But we can hope that the Mullah’s tick off the populous enough that we could have real reform and the end of a major state sponsor of Terrorism.

Lance Murdock on June 13, 2009 at 10:59 PM

AP just issue a new twitter to follow: http://twitter.com/Change_for_Iran

Lance Murdock on June 13, 2009 at 11:01 PM

blatantblue on June 13, 2009 at 10:57 PM

Name names.

Good night, sweet dreams everyone.

Cindy Munford on June 13, 2009 at 11:01 PM

In our paper on campus we have the “Glad I Don’t Live There” feature — Iran has been one lol!

blatantblue on June 13, 2009 at 10:57 PM

That could be a very long list, hope America never gets on it but with Obama in charge…

scalleywag on June 13, 2009 at 11:02 PM

Cindy Munford on June 13, 2009 at 11:01 PM

night woman

blatantblue on June 13, 2009 at 11:02 PM

Lance Murdock on June 13, 2009 at 10:52 PM

The even sadder thing is 90% of the time he’s turned down.

FontanaConservative on June 13, 2009 at 11:06 PM

Cindy Munford on June 13,2009 at 11:02PM.

Nite Nite Cindy,don’t let the bed bugs bite!!:)

canopfor on June 13, 2009 at 11:06 PM

Night CM

katy on June 13, 2009 at 11:08 PM

Rise of the Revolutionary Guard.
http://americanfootprints.com/drupal/node/4435

elduende on June 13, 2009 at 11:14 PM

blah i guess ill go to bed too!

blatantblue on June 13, 2009 at 11:19 PM

What’s oil futures looking like for Monday? Anyone know?

SouthernGent on June 13, 2009 at 11:20 PM

This is what B-HO describes as vigorous debate. Howz about vigorous fraud. Democrats know a lot about voter fraud.

Mojave Mark on June 13, 2009 at 11:24 PM

Maybe that’s because the American Revolution wasn’t a revolution so much as a provincial rebellion.

Count to 10 on June 13, 2009 at 10:18 PM

Oh yes it was. It was The Revolution. The mother of all revolutions. There is no greater political accord than the United States Constitution. Like no other nation, America was founded on a creed.

That is revolutionary.

atheling on June 13, 2009 at 11:26 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZ2V-GyRYvc&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fmichellemalkin%2Ecom%2F&feature=player_embedded

From Michell’s site. Riot – raw video. The youth are screaming “we want feedom. Mousavi”

katy on June 13, 2009 at 11:28 PM

katy on June 13, 2009 at 11:28 PM

At this point the students should dump the Mousavi facade and go for broke cause the reign of terror is coming.

elduende on June 13, 2009 at 11:35 PM

katy on June 13, 2009 at 11:28 PM
At this point the students should dump the Mousavi facade and go for broke cause the reign of terror is coming.

elduende on June 13, 2009 at 11:35 PM

I see many parallels to the US. Our youth chanted change and yes we can.

And look what we got…. Anything but…

katy on June 13, 2009 at 11:38 PM

No wonder Obama can “talk with Achmadinejad“… they’re the same type of politician.

Allahu Acorn!

profitsbeard on June 13, 2009 at 11:39 PM

katy on June 13, 2009 at 11:28 PM

At this point the students should dump the Mousavi facade and go for broke cause the reign of terror is coming.

elduende on June 13, 2009 at 11:35 PM

I see many parallels to the US. Our youth chanted change and yes we can.

And look what we got…. Anything but…

katy on June 13, 2009 at 11:38 PM

Yeah, scary… From Reign of Terror 1 to Reign of Terror 2… Didn’t the French Revolution have several different periods of different tyrants? Let’s hope our youth can learn what “Change,” really means.

Upstater85 on June 13, 2009 at 11:41 PM

katy on June 13, 2009 at 11:38 PM

ha. well the Obama sycophants got “change” but I think some of them are going to live to regret it.

Obama’s silence in this is shameful though. His Iranian foreign policy lies in ruins tonite. His credibility destroyed by the mullahs. I’ll never forget he came out all smug yesterday afternoon ready to claim the Mousavi victory for himself and whamo! Pepto Bismol time Barry!

elduende on June 13, 2009 at 11:45 PM

Upstater85 on June 13, 2009 at 11:41 PM

The Jacobins started the reign of terror.

elduende on June 13, 2009 at 11:46 PM

Upstater85 on June 13, 2009 at 11:41 PM
elduende on June 13, 2009 at 11:45 PM

The Spin-meisters are working feverishly though the night to have the perfect angle.

Key word…. crisis!

katy on June 13, 2009 at 11:52 PM

The Jacobins started the reign of terror.

elduende on June 13, 2009 at 11:46 PM

So Khameini would be what exactly (if this were the French Rev.)? A Jacobin?

Upstater85 on June 13, 2009 at 11:54 PM

The Spin-meisters are working feverishly though the night to have the perfect angle.

Key word…. crisis!

katy on June 13, 2009 at 11:52 PM

Is that in their paygrade?

Upstater85 on June 13, 2009 at 11:55 PM

katy on June 13, 2009 at 11:52 PM

Hah! By tmmw night the obama flunkies will tell us that 1) they actually expected this to happen in Iran and 2) that in order to prevent something so egregious from ever happening here ACORN would now be placed in charge of counting all US election results.

elduende on June 13, 2009 at 11:55 PM

Upstater85 on June 13, 2009 at 11:54 PM

No i guess they had to go through a few cycles of revolutionary fervor before the Jacobins decided they would begin targeting counter-revolutionaries (reactionaries i think they were called) enemies. I will tell you this though these “eruptions” usually follow a pattern. I suspect that soon we’ll see a little ultra violence in Iran and either a collapse of the opposition or a collapse of the security forces. Once that happens look to see the “reign of terror” period when one side begins to consolidate its hold. Maybe a Mousavi on TV “confessing” to his crimes etc. etc.

elduende on June 14, 2009 at 12:00 AM

aty on June 13, 2009 at 11:52 PM

How do we turn this into a plus for Barry?

If we can’t, how quickly can we get him out to Hawaii to show off his moobs?

Loxodonta on June 14, 2009 at 12:04 AM

AP twitters on dates…. It’s sad…

katy on June 13, 2009 at 10:48 PM

Yeah, well, so do his dates. :(

FloatingRock on June 14, 2009 at 12:05 AM

ACORN would now be placed in charge of counting all US election results.

elduende on June 13, 2009 at 11:55 PM

Are you kidding? Obama just fired ACORN and is now calling the IRGC to oversee future US elections.

katy on June 14, 2009 at 12:06 AM

Yeah, well, so do his dates. :(

FloatingRock on June 14, 2009 at 12:05 AM

HAAAAAAAAAAAA!

more sad…

katy on June 14, 2009 at 12:06 AM

Isn’t the current conservative movement reactionary?

That asked, I don’t know… Is Mousavi a reactionary? Well… what do you guys think?

Upstater85 on June 14, 2009 at 12:07 AM

No, no revolution. Over the years I’ve watched these crazies do this a dozen or more times and nothing permanent ever comes of it.

rplat on June 13, 2009 at 10:52 PM

No second amendment.

FloatingRock on June 14, 2009 at 12:08 AM

moobs?

Loxodonta on June 14, 2009 at 12:04 AM

That word makes me feel dirty…..

Obama will call for a World Summit on the Iranian elections.

Watch…

katy on June 14, 2009 at 12:09 AM

The one thing I have learned about all this Iranian stuff is that they are Persians, and not Arabs in the sense of Saudi Arabians. I think many people lump all of the Middle East in one Muslim basket, and do not recall from our history books that all Middle Eastern countries translate to being Arab countries. Therefore, it would make sense the people of Iran may not be so inclined to join the “death to Amerika” crowd, but they probably are not so inclined to join the “death to Israel” crowd either.

I do worry how Iranians are going to feel if some die when Israel takes out the nukes.
___________________________________________________________________________

freeus on June 13, 2009 at 9:50 PM

i like you.

Mommypundit on June 13, 2009 at 10:00 PM

Thank you. I like you too. Hope you had a good date night, and the “crunchies” are at a minimum next week. LOL!

freeus on June 14, 2009 at 12:10 AM

Obama’s Amazing Effect on Iranian Public Opinion

According to a new poll, 29 percent of Iranians hold a positive view toward the United States, down from 34 percent in February 2008.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090608/ap_on_re_mi_ea/us_iran_poll

Hope and change.

Are you kidding? Obama just fired ACORN and is now calling the IRGC to oversee future US elections.

katy on June 14, 2009 at 12:06 AM

Lol! Maybe we can get Obama a turban and a beard to round it all out.

Isn’t the current conservative movement reactionary?

That asked, I don’t know… Is Mousavi a reactionary? Well… what do you guys think?

Upstater85 on June 14, 2009 at 12:07 AM

I think all this noise about Mousavi obscures one important thing. He was selected by the Mullahs to stand for election. I wonder does anyone think that he was selected because he was warm and fuzzy? No. He’s a creature of the Islamic revolution. He would be no better for us or his people I think people support him because he is not Ajad.

I read somewhere today that Mousavi has had a “history” with the supreme ruler Iyatollah Khameni and that they have been feuding for a couple of decades.

elduende on June 14, 2009 at 12:17 AM

I think many people lump all of the Middle East in one Muslim basket, and do not recall from our history books that all Middle Eastern countries translate to being Arab countries.

This is why I term that side the arab/persian/muslim world. There are many moving parts and different cultures involved, but one must keep in mind that islam is just the formalization fo desert arab culture, with an attached mythology, so arab culture seeps into all. But they all hate each other (just as most arabs hate each other) though they are happy to partner together anytime they think they can kill infidels. There is no such thing as “goodwill” in that world. Just the alliance of the day.

Therefore, it would make sense the people of Iran may not be so inclined to join the “death to Amerika” crowd,

Unfortunately, the persians were the original “Death to America” crowd and the islamic revolution in iran is what set the stage for the meteoric rise of islamic violence we see today. The traditional arab terrorism had a part, but when islam took over control of the state power of iran, everything changed.

but they probably are not so inclined to join the “death to Israel” crowd either.

It’s difficult to know. Israel is not the number one problem on Iranian minds, as they despise the Sunni arabs. Of course, that hasn’t stopped the mullahs from supporting Hamas … but that all goes to what I said about the nonexistence of goodwill in the arab/persian/muslim world. Just the alliance of today.

I do worry how Iranians are going to feel if some die when Israel takes out the nukes.

freeus on June 14, 2009 at 12:10 AM

I don’t. And, if Israel were smart, they’d take the Iranian oil and gas fields at the same time.

progressoverpeace on June 14, 2009 at 12:21 AM

I think all this noise about Mousavi obscures one important thing. He was selected by the Mullahs to stand for election. I wonder does anyone think that he was selected because he was warm and fuzzy? No. He’s a creature of the Islamic revolution. He would be no better for us or his people I think people support him because he is not Ajad.

I read somewhere today that Mousavi has had a “history” with the supreme ruler Iyatollah Khameni and that they have been feuding for a couple of decades.

elduende on June 14, 2009 at 12:17 AM

Yeah, this is where I’m leaning… One could try to argue that

The traitors to the nation’s vote have no fear if this house of Persians burns in flames.

is a reactionary statement, but then Barack Obama’s call for fiscal responsibility may be too (HAAAA…)

Further, if the above statement is reactionary, then many European Conservatives would probably be called reactionary. They may or may not be. One thing is certain. European Conservatism is a completely different beast than American Conservatism… I don’t even know if I’d call it “rightist.”

Upstater85 on June 14, 2009 at 12:23 AM

The one thing I have learned about all this Iranian stuff is that they are Persians, and not Arabs freeus on June 14, 2009 at 12:10 AM

The real kicker is that the Persians are only 51% of Iran. The other groups in Iran have been severely oppressed by the Persian mullahs. If the mullahs were to lose power the uprising against the “Persians” would result in a bloodbath.

Persians 51%, Azeris 24%, Gilakis and Mazandaranis 8%, Kurds 7%, Arabs 3%, Lurs 2%, Baloch 2%, Turkmen 2%, other 1%.

elduende on June 14, 2009 at 12:25 AM

I don’t. And, if Israel were smart, they’d take the Iranian oil and gas fields at the same time.

progressoverpeace on June 14, 2009 at 12:21 AM

How in the hell could they do that?

BallisticBob on June 14, 2009 at 12:26 AM

elduende on June 14, 2009 at 12:25 AM

Heh… Joe Biden could rile up the Kurds…

Upstater85 on June 14, 2009 at 12:27 AM

Upstater85 on June 14, 2009 at 12:27 AM

He would then ask why he’s being asked to address the cottage cheese industry at such a critical time in the middle east.

katy on June 14, 2009 at 12:31 AM

Heh… Joe Biden could rile up the Kurds…

Upstater85 on June 14, 2009 at 12:27 AM

Hah. good ol Joe could def rile them up.

elduende on June 14, 2009 at 12:33 AM

All these past eight years we have been told over and over again how the evil American cons put the Shah in power and this is what sparked the Islamist revolution. We deserved their hated. We supported a cruel dictator and it is no wonder why they yell ‘Death to America’.

Fast forward to 2009. Barry and the Crew will go about their business with Dinnerjacket. They will parley, and dine, but in the end the Barry Government will shake their hands and pat them on the head. Now how many Iranians will hate America? The shoe stinks, doesn’t it libtards? Your glorious new leader is going to support the Islamofacists and to hell with all those people you have been crying about.

Limerick on June 14, 2009 at 12:33 AM

How in the hell could they do that?

BallisticBob on June 14, 2009 at 12:26 AM

The same way they held Sinai.

I know Israel would never even think of doing this, but they should. There is going to be a run for the gulf fields, eventually, as the US is now out of the game.

And the fact is that all threats from the arab/persian/muslim world start and stop with the control of the gulf oil fields.

progressoverpeace on June 14, 2009 at 12:34 AM

If these reports are true, why are they complaining about a rigged election when their whole democracy is a sham anyway? Even if the election were run perfectly, it’s for a largely figurehead position in an openly acknowledged theocracy. So what’s the point?

jwolf on June 14, 2009 at 12:36 AM

That word makes me feel dirty…..

Obama will call for a World Summit on the Iranian elections.

Watch…

katy on June 14, 2009 at 12:09 AM

When there’s any possibility of that image of His Moobs being linked to, I refuse to click!

Loxodonta on June 14, 2009 at 12:37 AM

When there’s any possibility of that image of His Moobs being linked to, I refuse to click!

Loxodonta on June 14, 2009 at 12:37 AM

That reminds me, Lox… You’ve missed your hourly treatment of Scarf de la Femme-Donk:

I think this one was just precious… Wonder if the Revolutionaries will dig the Red.
http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/0chi9OwfY79B5/340x.jpg

Pure confidence tingles up my leg with this one…
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_rW-OJ48AJBU/RhPn7x366RI/AAAAAAAAAuY/EWcQPyTL0Ec/s320/scarf.bmp

Now Hillary shows these Eritreans how to fear Allah…
http://www.chicagotribune.com/media/photo/2008-02/36092493.jpg

Upstater85 on June 14, 2009 at 12:47 AM

Bwahahahahahahahahha

The great creator of Islamofacism offers his two cents:

Former US president Jimmy Carter said he expected no major change in Iran’s policies with Mr Ahmadinejad’s reelection.

“I think this election has bought out a lot of opposition to his policies in Iran, and I’m sure he’ll listen to those opinions and hopefully moderate his position,”

TelegraphUK

Limerick on June 14, 2009 at 12:49 AM

Loxodonta on June 14, 2009 at 12:37 AM
.
What about Mich O’s inkidinky? No motion pictures either.
.
No more links please unless they’re more Harpo.
.

Americannodash on June 14, 2009 at 12:50 AM

Limerick on June 14, 2009 at 12:49 AM

Bwahahahahahahahahha

*start crying…*

He really is crazy… Too all trolls, think of him as your “version” of Nancy Reagan.

Upstater85 on June 14, 2009 at 12:50 AM

Upstater85 on June 14, 2009 at 12:47 AM

I want you to know that that first picture made me jerk so much that I knocked some papers off my desk and hurt myself.

I’m not clicking any more of your images!

Loxodonta on June 14, 2009 at 12:51 AM

No more links please unless they’re more Harpo.
.

Americannodash on June 14, 2009 at 12:50 AM

Harpo?

Upstater85 on June 14, 2009 at 12:51 AM

I want you to know that that first picture made me jerk so much that I knocked some papers off my desk and hurt myself.

I’m not clicking any more of your images!

Loxodonta on June 14, 2009 at 12:51 AM

Well, if it makes you feel better, your response was priceless :)

Upstater85 on June 14, 2009 at 12:52 AM

I think this one was just precious… Wonder if the Revolutionaries will dig the Red.
http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/0chi9OwfY79B5/340x.jpgUpstater85 on June 14, 2009 at 12:47 AM

Wow! I’ve noticed she loves to wear red kinda like Chavez.

Well look at the time its almost 9 am in Tehran let me see what news has hit the interwebs about the students.

I think this election has bought out a lot of opposition to his policies in Iran, and I’m sure he’ll listen to those opinions and hopefully moderate his position,”

TelegraphUK

Limerick on June 14, 2009 at 12:49 AM

Holy crap! That really is unbelievable! WTF is wrong with these people? Which reminds me of why the Mullahs feel comfortable being so blatant…Obama…is Carter on Steroids. They know they can get away with anything now.

elduende on June 14, 2009 at 12:56 AM

progressoverpeace on June 14, 2009 at 12:34 AM

Sinai= Iran?

Wow….

BallisticBob on June 14, 2009 at 12:58 AM

BallisticBob on June 14, 2009 at 12:58 AM

Oil Fields = Iran?

Wow.

What’s your point, Bob?

progressoverpeace on June 14, 2009 at 1:02 AM

“…the settlement of the Czechoslovakian problem, which has now been achieved is, in my view, only the prelude to a larger settlement in which all Europe may find peace. This morning I had another talk with the German Chancellor, Herr Hitler, and here is the paper which bears his name upon it as well as mine (waves paper to the crowd – receiving loud cheers and “Hear Hears”). Some of you, perhaps, have already heard what it contains but I would just like to read it to you (proceeds to read the agreement). [...] We regard the agreement signed last night and the Anglo-German Naval Agreement, as symbolic of the desire of our two peoples never to go to war with one another again.”-Neville Chamberlain

“Chamberlain seemed such a nice old gentleman that I thought I would give him my autograph.”-Adolph Hitler

“I think this election has bought out a lot of opposition to his policies in Iran, and I’m sure he’ll listen to those opinions and hopefully moderate his position,” – Jimmy Carter

The grandfather of the Democratic Party is a real piece of work.

Limerick on June 14, 2009 at 1:03 AM

The grandfather of the Democratic Party is a real piece of work.

Limerick on June 14, 2009 at 1:03 AM

How do you think the kiddies got the way they are?

Upstater85 on June 14, 2009 at 1:04 AM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4