Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Durbin cashed out on inside information: Sun-Times

posted at 12:15 pm on June 13, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

Dick Durbin managed to do all right during the stock collapse.  The senior Senator from Illinois and the Democrats’ number-two man in the upper chamber bailed out of the mutual funds that would shortly take a beating, moving his investments into Democratic contributor Warren Buffett’s fund, Berkshire Hathaway, just before the storm hit on Wall Street.  The Chicago Sun-Times and Bloomberg report today that the timing was no coincidence:

As U.S. stock markets plummeted last September, the Senate’s No. 2 Democrat, Dick Durbin, sold more than $115,000 worth of stocks and mutual-fund shares and used much of the money to invest in Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc.

The Illinois senator’s 2008 financial disclosure statement shows he sold mutual-fund shares worth $42,696 on Sept. 19, the day after then-Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke urged congressional leaders in a closed meeting to craft legislation to help financially troubled banks. The same day, he bought $43,562 worth of Berkshire Hathaway’s Class B stock, the disclosure shows.

Altogether, Durbin sold investments worth $116,000 in September. By Oct. 2, he had invested $98,046 in Omaha, Neb.-based Berkshire Hathaway, the form shows.

The Standard & Poor’s 500 index plunged 4.7 percent last Sept. 15 after the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and Bank of America Corp.’s government-engineered takeover of Merrill Lynch & Co. By the end of October, the index had fallen 22.6 percent.

Durbin’s spokesman says that the September meeting revealed nothing of an insider nature, and that Durbin traded along with the market as the storm clouds gathered.  I wonder if the SEC would consider that a compelling alibi if it had been a Wall Street regulator who met with Paulson and traded like this the next day.  The Democrats in Congress would be screaming for his head in the latter example, but will surely remain silent as the graveyard about Durbin’s suspicious trading.

Chris Dodd also showed a remarkable talent for appreciating assets in a collapsing global economy:

A new appraisal of the Irish cottage owned by Sen. Christopher Dodd concludes that it is worth about three times as much as Dodd has been reporting on his financial disclosure forms.

The new value of the cottage, located on Inishnee in Galway County, is $658,000, according to Dodd’s 2008 financial disclosure form released today.

The appraisal was done by the same person who did the original one in 2002 when the 1,200 square-foot cottage was evaluated at about $190,000.

Dodd has been criticized for low-balling the worth of the cottage in his disclosure forms. Questions also have been raised about his original purchase of the cottage with a Kansas City businessman William Kessinger, who he met through long-time campaign contributor Edward Downe.

Michelle points out the trouble in this new evaluation by quoting Judicial Watch, which has pursued this matter:

Judicial Watch’s complaint alleges that Senator Dodd appeared at a hearing on behalf of Edward Downe, Jr. in 1993 to help Downe obtain a reduced sentence for violations involving tax and securities laws. In 2001, Dodd ultimately helped Downe secure a full presidential pardon for his crimes on President Clinton’s last day in office bypassing the normal pardon vetting process. In 2002, Dodd allegedly received a significantly reduced, below-market sales price, for a two-thirds interest in a property located in County Galway, Ireland, from Downe’s associate, William Kessinger. (Dodd already owned a one-third interest in the property.) Downe’s signature appears on the property transfer documents. He is listed as a witness.

(Judicial Watch has sought additional documents about this property from government authorities in Ireland.)

According to the complaint, Senator Dodd, Chairman of the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee, allegedly failed to report the gift in 2002 and may have filed inaccurate Senate Financial Disclosure forms related to the property ever since, in violation of the 1978 Ethics in Government Act. The penalty for filing false financial disclosure forms is $50,000 and up to one year in prison.

“This seems a straight-up quid pro quo. Dodd helped his apparently crooked friend and seems to have received a cut-rate real estate deal on a property in Ireland in exchange. Moreover, it appears Dodd attempted to cover up the gift by failing to disclose it on his financial disclosure forms. To put it mildly, this type of behavior clearly does not reflect well on the United States Senate. We hope the Senate Ethics Committee does a thorough and speedy investigation. Federal prosecutors also need to take a look at this, as knowingly filing false financial forms is a crime,” stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

There seems to be more than one Democrat enriching himself through public service.  Of course, the Democrats did run on the “culture of corruption,” but ever since have been culturing and cultivating it.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Didn’t Martha Stewart get thrown in the slammer for that?

Get a lawyer, little Dick!

jeff_from_mpls on June 13, 2009 at 12:18 PM

The senior Senator from Illinois and the Democrats’ number-two man in the upper chamber bailed out of the mutual funds that would shortly take a beating, moving his investments into Democratic contributor Warren Buffett’s fund, Berkshire Hathaway, just before the storm hit on Wall Street.

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

ddrintn on June 13, 2009 at 12:18 PM

tear down the ‘priviledged class’ – they’re a bunch of crooks pointing across the room yelling ‘hey, there’s the boogie man!’

gatorboy on June 13, 2009 at 12:20 PM

I thought members of Congress had to put their assets in blind trusts. Obviously I was wrong but good grief everything they do is insider information.

Cindy Munford on June 13, 2009 at 12:20 PM

I was going to say the same thing about Martha. Didn’t she do time for the exact same thing?

Tasha on June 13, 2009 at 12:20 PM

Down the Memory Hole in a couple of days though.

ddrintn on June 13, 2009 at 12:21 PM

Chicago politics and politicians

William Amos on June 13, 2009 at 12:22 PM

Frog march this p.o.s. right off the Senate chamber floor.

E T Cartman on June 13, 2009 at 12:23 PM

All things considered, the GOP should be steamrolling the heck out of these corrupt Dem’s!

IT IS BEYOND TIME TO PLAY DIRTY!

anniekc on June 13, 2009 at 12:24 PM

I was born in Illinois. It used to be a fine, friendly midwestern state. How did it become the stinking cesspool it is today? You can’t blame it all on Chicago…or can you?

SKYFOX on June 13, 2009 at 12:24 PM

The most corrupt government in US history.

faraway on June 13, 2009 at 12:25 PM

“Do as I say, not as I do.” Typical Congresscritter

coyoterex on June 13, 2009 at 12:26 PM

What a Dick.

NoFanofLibs on June 13, 2009 at 12:26 PM

Chicago politics and politicians

William Amos on June 13, 2009 at 12:22 PM

Exactly. The corrupt Chicago machine is now running the country, ruining the country, and personally profiting from it.

Loxodonta on June 13, 2009 at 12:27 PM

I was going to say the same thing about Martha. Didn’t she do time for the exact same thing?

Tasha on June 13, 2009 at 12:20 PM

IIRC, her jail time related to her response(or lack) to inquiries regarding insider trading, not the trading itself. Turban Durbin is undoubtably more accomplished at lying than Martha, and Holder is the AG(wink, wink)

a capella on June 13, 2009 at 12:28 PM

Hell with it, I’m running for office, why man an oar when you can whip the slaves instead and get rich doing it?

Mord on June 13, 2009 at 12:28 PM

Oh, I am sure it’s all very innocent.

Merely good luck and coincidences. The Dems would never do anything so underhanded and blatently obvious, come on.

tru2tx on June 13, 2009 at 12:28 PM

SKYFOX on June 13, 2009 at 12:24 PM

Yes We Can! (says the Wisconsinite)

:)

PimFortuynsGhost on June 13, 2009 at 12:29 PM

I still hold to the fact, that Democrats deliberately sent the market into a tailspin. With their “progressive” tactics, of pushing for houses, to those who didn’t have jobs, and could hardly afford them. They knew it was coming. Look at Soros. He made a bundle off of the market during the economic fall. I have no doubts he was complicit in the fall, and took advantage of it as well.

capejasmine on June 13, 2009 at 12:29 PM

Didn’t mean to use the word fact.

I still hold to my belief. :)

capejasmine on June 13, 2009 at 12:29 PM

Martha Stewart goes to prison, Dick Durbin goes back once again to represent the “people”.

jimmy2shoes on June 13, 2009 at 12:30 PM

Yawn… So what.

faol on June 13, 2009 at 12:30 PM

Obi Wan Kenobi, please pick up the white courtesy phone.

More “these aren’t the ‘droids you’re looking for” needed on Capitol Hill.

Gator Country on June 13, 2009 at 12:31 PM

I need more information-

Did Durbin a) go to the meeting B) start trading immediately at opening bell the next day c) did they go public the next day before opening bell or did they delay the news til later in the day?

If all those things happened I believe Durbin and any others who were at that meeting who did this should go to jail.

journeyintothewhirlwind on June 13, 2009 at 12:32 PM

So who’s going to prosecute these too crooks? Or is it all okay because they’re lefties.

petefrt on June 13, 2009 at 12:32 PM

Hmmmm. Uncle Sugah must be wanting Dick Durbin and Chris Dodd out.

That’s how it goes in Chicagojesusland! He should pick on Pelosi.

Key West Reader on June 13, 2009 at 12:33 PM

I forgot. Is his first name Dick…Oh wait! Yes it is!!!

Mr. Grump on June 13, 2009 at 12:34 PM

They knew it was coming. Look at Soros. He made a bundle off of the market during the economic fall. I have no doubts he was complicit in the fall, and took advantage of it as well.

capejasmine on June 13, 2009 at 12:29 PM

Now it’s time to find out where all that “stimulus” cash went. Right? I’m thinking most of it went to Kenya or Saudi Arabia. But, we’ll never know. We’re too stupid to know.
/

Key West Reader on June 13, 2009 at 12:35 PM

The SunTimes is clearly inciting you right wing zealots to treachery.

faraway on June 13, 2009 at 12:35 PM

I forgot. Is his first name Dick…Oh wait! Yes it is!!!

Mr. Grump on June 13, 2009 at 12:34 PM

Or as I have affectionately called him for years….

The APTLY named Dick Durbin.

Jvette on June 13, 2009 at 12:37 PM

Where’s the proof that this wasn’t just a shrewd move on Durbin’s part?

AnninCA on June 13, 2009 at 12:37 PM

Politician with a ‘D’ after his name? No story here. Move along wingnuts.

Hey Steele, it’d probably be a good idea for you to keep notes on this and bring it up in September of 2010.

You can’t retreat any further. You have to go on offense.
Everyweek you should have a youtube address. If twelve year olds are doing it, a Hopkins man like you should have no problem.

Iblis on June 13, 2009 at 12:38 PM

Where’s the proof that this wasn’t just a shrewd move on Durbin’s part?

AnninCA on June 13, 2009 at 12:37 PM

I think some of us think its wrong to use your political office for finaincial gain when you know others will lose alot of money.

William Amos on June 13, 2009 at 12:38 PM

Pitchforks.Heads.Not Kidding.

SouthernGent on June 13, 2009 at 12:39 PM

The SunTimes is clearly inciting you right wing zealots to treachery.

faraway on June 13, 2009 at 12:35 PM

I’ll forgive that remark, since you obviously like being STUCK ON STUPID!!!

capejasmine on June 13, 2009 at 12:41 PM

Altogether, Durbin sold investments worth $116,000 in September. By Oct. 2, he had invested $98,046 in Omaha, Neb.-based Berkshire Hathaway

So, he bought one share?

cntrlfrk on June 13, 2009 at 12:41 PM

Where’s the proof that this wasn’t just a shrewd move on Durbin’s part?

AnninCA on June 13, 2009 at 12:37 PM

Oh it was shrewd alright! Just like that shrewd move Ken Lay made selling off his Enron stock.

conservnut on June 13, 2009 at 12:41 PM

Durbin HAS to be censured by the Senate IMMEDIATLY! It is not possible to have such a high committee head meeting in secret and gaining any information that leads directly, or even indirectly, to his own personal gain.

Even if Durbin had a sell order pending, he needed to stop it once he was made aware of the situation in that meeting.

This is a major violation of public trust and it cannot ever be forgiven. This cannot be ‘business as usual’ for anyone in the US Senate.

Freddy on June 13, 2009 at 12:41 PM

Where’s the proof that this wasn’t just a shrewd move on Durbin’s part?

AnninCA on June 13, 2009 at 12:37 PM

Why am I not surprised that you don’t know how insider trading works? The allegation is that Durbin was given information from “someone” that advised him to sell out before everyone else. It’s bad. It’s illegal. People go to jail for that. Ask Martha Stewart.

Then again, since you don’t actually know how health insurance works, I’m not surprised you don’t know anything about any other business practises.

mjk on June 13, 2009 at 12:42 PM

I think some of us think its wrong to use your political office for finaincial gain when you know others will lose alot of money.

You mean, because he saw the way the wind was blowing? That’s not the same as insider trading.

I often wonder if we all wouldn’t be better off with stronger libel laws in this country.

It would sure tone down the rhetoric. That’s awful to accuse someone of this without proof.

AnninCA on June 13, 2009 at 12:43 PM

Altogether, Durbin sold investments worth $116,000 in September. By Oct. 2, he had invested $98,046 in Omaha, Neb.-based Berkshire Hathaway

So, he bought one share?

cntrlfrk on June 13, 2009 at 12:41 PM

He bought BRK-B

zmdavid on June 13, 2009 at 12:43 PM

Why am I not surprised that you don’t know how insider trading works? The allegation is that Durbin was given information from “someone” that advised him to sell out before everyone else. It’s bad. It’s illegal. People go to jail for that. Ask Martha Stewart.

I absolutely understand insider trading and how it works. And I understand you have to have proof that information was used.

I always thought Martha Stewart was wrongly accused of that, and she was not, in fact, convicted of it, either. She was convicted of lying to a federal agent.

And that was bullhockey, too.

AnninCA on June 13, 2009 at 12:44 PM

If you take a trade that is fortuitous as “evidence” of insider trading, then you’re going to have to go after all shareholder trades on the day of any major announcment.

*jeesh*

This is stupid.

AnninCA on June 13, 2009 at 12:45 PM

Where’s the proof that this wasn’t just a shrewd move on Durbin’s part?

AnninCA on June 13, 2009 at 12:37 PM

If Durbin was a Republican, this news wouldn’t be released until Monday, and the lead video would be of him being frog marched from the Senate in handcuffs.

Since it’s Durbin the Democrat, it gets an off-hand mention over the weekend that will be quickly forgotten, and the lead story on Monday will be about how the color of Sarah Palin’s toenail polish is really a secret code expressing her solidarity with neo-Nazi groups.

I see that The Force is already strong with this one.

Gator Country on June 13, 2009 at 12:46 PM

I often wonder if we all wouldn’t be better off with stronger libel laws in this country.

AnninCA on June 13, 2009 at 12:43 PM

Ann is on the talking points today. All who oppose the Marxists on the Left are radical right wing terrorists. People like Ann will be loading us into rail cars soon.

faraway on June 13, 2009 at 12:46 PM

Durbin HAS to be censured by the Senate IMMEDIATLY! It is not possible to have such a high committee head meeting in secret and gaining any information that leads directly, or even indirectly, to his own personal gain.

Show the minutes of the meeting, what was discussed, when the trade was executed……then we’ll talk.

Until then, this is nothing more than National Enquirer junk.

AnninCA on June 13, 2009 at 12:47 PM

Why not put a (D) next to this pawns name in the headline?

Jed1899 on June 13, 2009 at 12:48 PM

You mean, because he saw the way the wind was blowing? That’s not the same as insider trading.

I often wonder if we all wouldn’t be better off with stronger libel laws in this country.

It would sure tone down the rhetoric. That’s awful to accuse someone of this without proof.

AnninCA on June 13, 2009 at 12:43 PM

What in this paragraph confuses you dear? “The Illinois senator’s 2008 financial disclosure statement shows he sold mutual-fund shares worth $42,696 on Sept. 19, the day after then-Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke urged congressional leaders in a closed meeting to craft legislation to help financially troubled banks. The same day, he bought $43,562 worth of Berkshire Hathaway’s Class B stock, the disclosure shows.”

He has a meeting, where it’s forewarned this is coming, and Congress needs to act. A meeting he attended. The next day, he goes out, and pulls the old presto chango, and makes out fine. How in the world is this so confusing???

capejasmine on June 13, 2009 at 12:48 PM

I always thought Martha Stewart was wrongly accused of that, and she was not, in fact, convicted of it, either. She was convicted of lying to a federal agent.

And that was bullhockey, too.

It ain’t the crime, its the coverup.

Those July 4th tea parties can’t happen soon enough

Iblis on June 13, 2009 at 12:48 PM

Show the minutes of the meeting, what was discussed, when the trade was executed……then we’ll talk.

AnninCA on June 13, 2009 at 12:47 PM

So, you too, would like to see this investigated?

faraway on June 13, 2009 at 12:48 PM

Martha Stewart goes to prison, Dick Durbin goes back once again to represent the “people”.

jimmy2shoes on June 13, 2009 at 12:30 PM

OR, OR, Barry will offer him a job.

Upstater85 on June 13, 2009 at 12:49 PM

Laws don’t apply to our democrat party overlords.

It seems some folks need to be reeducated.

Rebar on June 13, 2009 at 12:49 PM

When are you people going to realize that a big time Lib can do no wrong .They are always above the law and not subject to the law that we surfs are.

thmcbb on June 13, 2009 at 12:50 PM

Until then, this is nothing more than National Enquirer junk.

AnninCA on June 13, 2009 at 12:47 PM

Sorry Ann… it would appear National Enquirer is correct now about 50% of the time…

Upstater85 on June 13, 2009 at 12:50 PM

In the language of troll:

Think

“Enron!!!”

“Martha Stewart!!!”

“Madoff!!!”

Upstater85 on June 13, 2009 at 12:51 PM

What’s the big deal. We’re talking Democrat politicians. They could kill a bus load of kids in cold blood and their idiot supporters would make up excuses for them. They’re all crooks.But the media & DEM voters don’t care.It’s another non-news item.

Jeff from WI on June 13, 2009 at 12:51 PM

I was born in Illinois. It used to be a fine, friendly midwestern state. How did it become the stinking cesspool it is today? You can’t blame it all on Chicago…or can you?

SKYFOX on June 13, 2009 at 12:24 PM

no, you can blame it on the deranged democrats. and people named kookeneisha who vote for them thinking they will get free gas cards and food coupons while they sit on their ass all day making babies with 6 different fathers while somehow finding time in the day to praise preachers like rev wright.

THAT IS WHO YOU BLAME IT ON!

Ghoul aid on June 13, 2009 at 12:52 PM

Since “He” won, there’s nothing to see here. Move along, rubes. The adults are in charge.

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on June 13, 2009 at 12:52 PM

Unfortunately, Durbin sold on the 19th, after the collapse of Bear Stearns. While it might be nice to see him do the Frog March, you would have had to see him do some stock sales prior to the collapse of Bear to get him on insider trading, imho.

While some of the Concern Trolls are trying to spank us about this, I have no doubt that the Sun-Times published this story because it was “smoke”. There’s much more to this story, I suspect.

I have no doubt that Durbin is a crook, like most people who come out of the Daley machine. But when you get as far as the U.S. Senate, you’re a polished crook, and you learn how to do these things right so you don’t embarrass the Chicago Democratic Organization. Durbin wouldn’t be stupid enough to be like John Gotti and openly insider trade in a way that would be obvious to someone from Justice. When you’re a Senator, you have a battery of attorneys from the best law firms in Chicago and K Street (who are attached to the DNC) who will tell you how best to arrange your stock portfolio so you are not caught.

There are different standards for Democrats.

victor82 on June 13, 2009 at 12:53 PM

So, you too, would like to see this investigated?

Sure. I worked with top executives on this issue. Let me tell you, they don’t mess around with this law. That’s the one place where the SEC has always been vicious in prosecution.

Rightfully so.

There are minutes of committee meetings. And that’s what’s needed. If he did do anything.

If it was just water cooler talk? Forget it. That’s not insider trading.

AnninCA on June 13, 2009 at 12:53 PM

Sorry Ann… it would appear National Enquirer is correct now about 50% of the time…

Good one. You’re right. :)

AnninCA on June 13, 2009 at 12:53 PM

Ghoul aid on June 13, 2009 at 12:52 PM

People named kookeneisha don’t always vote…

There’s some well to do individuals to blame here too.

Upstater85 on June 13, 2009 at 12:53 PM

Sorry Ann… it would appear National Enquirer is correct now about 50% of the time…

Upstater85 on June 13, 2009 at 12:50 PM

Darn, that gives them a better track record than the MSM.

coyoterex on June 13, 2009 at 12:54 PM

Until then, this is nothing more than National Enquirer junk.

AnninCA on June 13, 2009 at 12:47 PM

This is the Chicago Sun Times, and Bloomberg reporting. Not LAT, or NYT, honey!

capejasmine on June 13, 2009 at 12:54 PM

Laws don’t apply to our democrat party overlords.

It seems some folks need to be reeducated.

Rebar on June 13, 2009 at 12:49 PM

Sometimes two feet are better than four.

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on June 13, 2009 at 12:54 PM

Good one. You’re right. :)

AnninCA on June 13, 2009 at 12:53 PM

Sad, but starting to become more true.

Now, if you had said Rolling Stones or Playboy, then they really do have no credibility.

Upstater85 on June 13, 2009 at 12:54 PM

Sorry Ann… it would appear National Enquirer is correct now about 50% of the time…

Upstater85 on June 13, 2009 at 12:50 PM

Tru dat. Remember how they were way out in front on the Silky Pony baby daddy story?

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on June 13, 2009 at 12:55 PM

Darn, that gives them a better track record than the MSM.

coyoterex on June 13, 2009 at 12:54 PM

Why do you think the MSM looks down on them?

Upstater85 on June 13, 2009 at 12:55 PM

Tru dat. Remember how they were way out in front on the Silky Pony baby daddy story?

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on June 13, 2009 at 12:55 PM

Yeah, they still make some mistakes though…

That’s why they only get a 50% versus the 25% score for the network television stations…

Upstater85 on June 13, 2009 at 12:57 PM

Honest politicians take the loss

– U.S. senators including Republicans Jon Kyl of Arizona and Orrin Hatch of Utah suffered losses in their personal portfolios as the federal government moved to bailout the floundering financial industry last year.

Hatch reported holding from $50,000 to $100,000 worth of Charlotte, North Carolina-based Wachovia Corp. stock in 2007. By the time the bank was taken over by San Francisco-based Wells Fargo & Co., his holdings were worth no more than $30,000, according to a 2008 financial disclosure form released yesterday.

Kyl sold 150 shares of New York-based American International Group Inc. on Oct. 17, taking a $4,144 loss. He also lost $5,019 after selling 330 shares of Freddie Mac and $3,775 after selling 200 shares of Fannie Mae. Kyl sold his shares of Washington- based Fannie and McLean, Virginia-based Freddie two weeks after the U.S. took control of the two mortgage giants.

“Like many Americans with IRAs or other retirement accounts, Senator Kyl holds a variety of investments as part of a broadly diversified portfolio independently managed by a financial adviser,” said Ryan Patmintra, a spokesman for him.

The wife of Massachusetts Democratic Senator John Kerry, Teresa Heinz Kerry, sold all of her stock in AIG, a transaction valued at between $475,000 and $1.3 million.

The last sale occurred Sept. 18, two days after the company ceded majority control to the government in exchange for an $85 billion loan. Kerry reported last year that his wife owned more than $2 million in AIG stock.

William Amos on June 13, 2009 at 12:57 PM

The insider trade laws are very specific. This shouldn’t be hard to nail down.

What’s up with the NY TIMES on this?

This is just a matter of rushing a story to print!

AnninCA on June 13, 2009 at 12:58 PM

There are different standards for Democrats.

victor82 on June 13, 2009 at 12:53 PM

I think the Democrats have openly said this…

The only reason they come down on the Republicans is because they are the “party of morals.”

I think I once saw Stewart babbling on about this /sarc

Upstater85 on June 13, 2009 at 12:59 PM

This is the Chicago Sun Times, and Bloomberg reporting. Not LAT, or NYT, honey!

Ohhhhhhhhhhhh! You’re right.

Got it, now.

AnninCA on June 13, 2009 at 12:59 PM

Most ethical congress never

NeverLiberal on June 13, 2009 at 12:59 PM

The National Enquirer has my utmost respect. CBS, NBC, ABC, and all the others(including newspapers) that refused to report on silky pony……not so much.

Ghoul aid on June 13, 2009 at 1:00 PM

The insider trade laws are very specific. This shouldn’t be hard to nail down.

What’s up with the NY TIMES on this?

This is just a matter of rushing a story to print!

AnninCA on June 13, 2009 at 12:58 PM

They’re confused. Should they root for Ahmadinejad or the people causing violence in the streets…

Upstater85 on June 13, 2009 at 1:01 PM

Show the minutes of the meeting, what was discussed, when the trade was executed……then we’ll talk.

Until then, this is nothing more than National Enquirer junk.

AnninCA on June 13, 2009 at 12:47 PM

Ann,

Durbin is, more than likely, a fellow who got an inside tip after it was too late to sell his stocks. So he invested in Berkshire-Hathaway after talking with Buffet’s people.

Look, you’re one of those people who instantly defends a Democrat no matter how much they stink to high heaven. That’s your prerogative. Durbin came out of the Chicago Outfit-there’s nothing wrong with that, but I suspect that there’s precious little that’s right with it, either.

Dick Durbin got his job from the Outfit because he was a reliable stooge for the Machine. Obama got his because he was much better than Durbin. You can pretend that these people are clean as the hound’s tooth, but I would strongly advise against that-as the brewing Americorps imbroglio is making painfully clear.

My advice? Be an adult and deal with politicians as they are, not as you wish they were.

victor82 on June 13, 2009 at 1:02 PM

If it’s true, it’s time to go. Durbin better hope it’s unsubstantiated rumor because he wouldn’t survive it.

jdflorida on June 13, 2009 at 1:04 PM

So, is San Fran Nan going to use Porkulus funds to complete the “swamp draining” she promised when she became speaker?

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on June 13, 2009 at 1:06 PM

AnninCA on June 13, 2009 at 12:47 PM

ann, i’d also suggest living in the sate of Illinois/city of Chicago. then you could get a feel of all the slimy, sewer ridden shenanighans that go on daily here. why, by just breathing the air here, you can tatse it.

you can tatse it Ann. it’s that thick baby!

Ghoul aid on June 13, 2009 at 1:06 PM

I think the Democrats have openly said this…

The only reason they come down on the Republicans is because they are the “party of morals.”

I think I once saw Stewart babbling on about this /sarc

Upstater85 on June 13, 2009 at 12:59 PM

Well, sarcasm aside, it’s somewhat true.

When 90% of the press are members of one political party, how can one expect the press to cover political events fairly?

Answer: you don’t. This is one of the reasons the press is losing its cachet as independent arbiter of the facts of the day. People know they are being rooked by a partisan media.

People over the long run won’t believe that the fox can protect the hen house. Liberals who control the media don’t get this simple thing. The Chicago media probably know all about Durbin’s crookedness and are covering for him. They probably know the inside story about Obama, too.

However, there’s a gnawing sense among Americans that the press has taken sides, even though Obama has maintained his personal popularity throughout the first six months of his Administration.

That cannot help but undermine the “State Run Media” in the long run.

victor82 on June 13, 2009 at 1:08 PM

Let’s see,

Illinois Democrat – check
Partisan hack – check
Corrupt practices – check

OK folks, move along, nothing to see here.

SeniorD on June 13, 2009 at 1:11 PM

Where’s the proof that this wasn’t just a shrewd move on Durbin’s part?

In prosecuting insider information cases, one must conduct an investigation to get evidence, then successfully present that evidence in court to get a conviction.

Investigation first. Prosecution second. Trial third.

There is no investigation being undertaken of Senator Durbin, even though his trading activities are suspiciously similar to someone on Wall Street after just attending a meeting at which inside information was disclosed. Therefore, there will be no “proof.”

Very convenient for Senator Durbin and his supporters, isn’t it?

Loxodonta on June 13, 2009 at 1:12 PM

Are we now being run by the Chicago Mafia?

Where is the media with their “Culture of Corruption”?

hawkdriver on June 13, 2009 at 1:16 PM

Where is the media with their “Culture of Corruption”?

hawkdriver on June 13, 2009 at 1:16 PM

Serving the hors d’œuvre.

Loxodonta on June 13, 2009 at 1:20 PM

And, as usual, nothing will happen to Durbin because he has a “D” after his name. Oh, and he will get re-elected because the Chicago machine wants him re-elected.

johnsteele on June 13, 2009 at 1:28 PM

Term limits…

d1carter on June 13, 2009 at 1:29 PM

The senior Senator from Illinois and the Democrats’ number-two man in the upper chamber bailed out of the mutual funds that would shortly take a beating, moving his investments into Democratic contributor Warren Buffett’s fund, Berkshire Hathaway, just before the storm hit on Wall Street.

Hmmmmmmmmm is right!!
Throw his ass in jail.

izoneguy on June 13, 2009 at 1:33 PM

Wake me when the Republicans start to act like Pelosi did and rush to any microphone and holler about all this corruption.

moonsbreath on June 13, 2009 at 1:38 PM

It would sure tone down the rhetoric. That’s awful to accuse someone of this without proof.

AnninCA on June 13, 2009 at 12:43 PM

What did Durbin know and when did he know it?

TN Mom on June 13, 2009 at 1:43 PM

I miss Halliburton

deedtrader on June 13, 2009 at 1:43 PM

Chicago machine. Sounds legendary, but horrendous. Sort of invariably gets its way and that just cannot be helped by the poor on-lookers. Who are these guys?

ConScribe on June 13, 2009 at 1:50 PM

The Illinois senator’s 2008 financial disclosure statement shows he sold mutual-fund shares worth $42,696 on Sept. 19, the day after then-Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke urged congressional leaders in a closed meeting to craft legislation to help financially troubled banks. The same day, he bought $43,562 worth of Berkshire Hathaway’s Class B stock, the disclosure shows.

Did Durbin share this information-gained from a closed meeting- with ALL the good people of Illinois? Nah, Democrats don’t care about the little people…

TN Mom on June 13, 2009 at 1:54 PM

I’m sure it’s fine. Durbin’s a Democrat from Chicago; he wouldn’t do anything wrong.

Kensington on June 13, 2009 at 1:58 PM

President TelePrompter will issue a press release any moment now, condeming Durbin’s greedy ill-gotten gains made in the market…

*chirp*

TN Mom on June 13, 2009 at 2:05 PM

I miss W

faraway on June 13, 2009 at 2:07 PM

Elected officials should be forced…yes forced…by law, to own only GM and Chrysler stock. Keep it all in the family.

Limerick on June 13, 2009 at 2:10 PM

I was born in Illinois. It used to be a fine, friendly midwestern state. How did it become the stinking cesspool it is today? You can’t blame it all on Chicago…or can you?

SKYFOX on June 13, 2009 at 12:24 PM

Someone’s probably beat me to it, but YES WE CAN!

zeebeach on June 13, 2009 at 2:13 PM

Comment pages: 1 2


You must be logged in to post a comment.