Video: O’Reilly and Salon editor scream at each other over Tiller’s murder
posted at 9:32 pm on June 12, 2009 by Allahpundit
Both clips are good but it’s the second that’s must-see. The money line: “You know who has blood on their hands? You!” Walsh is the one who wrote the chief hit piece blaming O’Reilly for Tiller’s murder, so it’s not a little surreal to see them squaring off on the Factor. Bill goes for the throat early, accusing her of ducking the central moral issue here and of being a pro-abortion zealot — and darned if she doesn’t prove him right, downplaying the evidence that some late-term abortions are performed for convenience, not medical necessity, and confirming O’R's suspicions that she viewed Tiller as a “hero.” In fact, this is nothing so much as the torture debate by another name. Walsh has her facts — late-term abortions are always performed in life-threatening circumstances, just like waterboarding never, ever works — and when those facts are challenged, well, those challenges must be wrong. Why? Because we “live in two different worlds” or something, that’s why. Good work, Joan.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
This is my favorite quote today. It really needs to be embroidered. And hung in every liberal’s home and office.
Loxodonta on June 12, 2009 at 11:10 PM
I don’t see how Tiller could do those procedures. How could he sleep at night? How could all of those people who worked in his office? How could that church of his allow him to serve in any capacity? I have no problem with him attending church. Church should have been a good place for him. He should have been confronted with his immoral actions.
Voter from WA State on June 12, 2009 at 11:10 PM
You just spurred a thought. What happens when the US goes to Gov healthcare? Sure Obama will pay for late term abortions but what happens during future admins…. I wonder if the abortion supporters have thought through the possible implications of a single payer system…
TheBigOldDog on June 12, 2009 at 11:12 PM
I have no problem with O’Reilly. He is willing to take on a lot of issues others are afraid to tackle.
Voter from WA State on June 12, 2009 at 11:12 PM
Bill has been very passionate about any sort of abuse towards children – late term abortion, rape of an under age child, Jessica’s Law, assault on children, etc.
I am willing to bet that Bill was either a victim of or a witness to some form of physical abuse as a child. I say this as a crisis counselor for children/adolescents.
ny59giants on June 12, 2009 at 11:13 PM
Yeah, right. Women just ficklily change their mind about giving childbirth after seven months of pregnancy. Just, how stupid do you think women are, AP?
thuja on June 12, 2009 at 11:13 PM
How could that church of his allow him to serve in any capacity? I have no problem with him attending church. Church should have been a good place for him. He should have been confronted with his immoral actions.
Voter from WA State on June 12, 2009 at 11:10 PM
Uh, why didnt a bolt of lighting the size of an aircraft carrier hit that church while he was inside.
faol on June 12, 2009 at 11:13 PM
at the very least since Obambi & Co. demonized AIG execs for taking bonuses. tool
pfamis on June 12, 2009 at 11:17 PM
since when did it become OK to demonize someone performing something that is Legal?
Wasn’t George Tiller acquitted?
equality on June 12, 2009 at 9:56 PM
Tiller was acquitted for a single reason. The current HHS secretary and former KS governor. She pressed to have the felony charges dropped and the so-called prosecutor did a poor job on the remaining misdemeanor counts.
KS law requires an second examination by an independent doctor for a third term abortion. That wasn’t being done. The independent examination was done by a single physician who did nothing else associated with medicine. Aside from doing electrolysis, her income Tiller.
The simple fact is that abortions were performed when a birth DID NOT affect the life of the mother. He did perform abortions in violation of KS law and had the support of a lunatic pro-choice governor.
jack herman on June 12, 2009 at 11:19 PM
Just saw the replay.
Walsh offered the riduculous “I’m a pro-choice Catholic” line. She stands arm and arm with Pelosi, Biden, and other cafeteria Catholics.
Put up or shut up, lady. These late-term abortions are for ghouls.
BuckeyeSam on June 12, 2009 at 11:19 PM
I saw this. They sounded like a married couple with alot of problems going at it.
LtE126 on June 12, 2009 at 11:20 PM
More here.
(No pics..it’s safe)
aquaviva on June 12, 2009 at 11:22 PM
ALFRED
One day I found a child playing with
a ruby as big as a tangerine.
(shrugs)
The bandit had been throwing the
stones away.
WAYNE
So why was he stealing them?
ALFRED
Because he thought it was good sport.
Because some men aren’t looking for
anything logical, like money… they
can’t be bought, bullied, reasoned or
negotiated with.
(grave)
Some men just want to watch the world
burn.
Wayne stares at Alfred. Reaches for the bat-suit.
TheBigOldDog on June 12, 2009 at 11:22 PM
I apologize if this has been said before but I just watched this on cable rerun….here is my question. Didn’t Scott Peterson go to jail for killing TWO people? (one was a late term fetus) Guess it’s only a “person” unless it’s sucked out?
proudteadrinker on June 12, 2009 at 11:25 PM
A friend of mine had an abortion. It took her years to be able to get over it. The only thing that helped her get over it was when she finally asked God to forgive her. She now works in a crisis clinic counseling girls who are pregnant and unmarried. The clinic does a great job of helping these young women to make the right decision for them . . . adoption or learning how to deal with the challenges of single motherhood.
Voter from WA State on June 12, 2009 at 11:25 PM
Yeah, that is true lie of the far left pro-abortion groupies.
Voter from WA State on June 12, 2009 at 11:27 PM
The perverted logic, iirc, is that, if the mother was intending to have the baby, it was a person. Really…
TheBigOldDog on June 12, 2009 at 11:29 PM
Ms. Joan Walsh kept on saying that because it is legal in the State that Tiller was practicing, it was ok what he was doing. Hmmmmmmm……
Is she aware, as well as all the other Liberlas that use this pathetic line that it was legal to own slaves? That in Nazi Germany it was legal to murder Jews and anyone that was not party of the Aryan race? If we use Ms. Joan Walsh’s logic she also believes that while slavery was legal and when it was legal to murder Jews in Nazi Germany, it was ok to do.
Ms. Walsh should also be informed that you cannot be a Roman Catholic and be for abortion. That is an Oxymoron! Anyone in the Roman Catholic Church that promotes, supports, performs, or has an abortion is excommunicated, thus NOT a Roman Catholic.
Incredible how people are willing to justify the murder of human beings.
O’Reilly was 100% correct, Ms. Joan Walsh has blood in her hands!
Cpt. Kirk on June 12, 2009 at 11:30 PM
I can’t help but notice HA has this sudden rush of people who are so …(logic challenged) Last night there was the genius named southerngal and today you.
I think I have figured this out
You are all old ladys from NYC… Mid forties to upper fifties maybe single issue type Repubs if repubs at all or perhaps just O supporters posing as something else.
Ex hippies like to smoke a little happy weed.
I can tell you, this ain’t cutting it. Your emabarassing yourself by making these gaping hole type arguements
kangjie on June 12, 2009 at 11:33 PM
Maybe something like this. Or better. Speaking for myself-if it does comes to that, I certainly hope so.
GERMANY
Availability: On request
Gestational limit: 12 weeks
Conditions: The woman must receive proper counselling three days before the procedure. The state-regulated counselling is required to inform the woman that the unborn have a right to life and to try to convince her to continue her pregnancy.
The procedure is not covered by public health insurance except for women with low income. The law includes penalties for people who force a pregnant woman to obtain an abortion or who induce a pregnant woman to have an abortion by maliciously withholding support payments.
Dreadnought on June 12, 2009 at 11:35 PM
Killing babies is a montstrous, evil practice. I don’t see how anyone with a soul can, not only sit idly by while it happens in this country, but also ardently defend its practice. Evil. There can be no other accurate description of this practice and those who defend it. EVIL.
King of the Britons on June 12, 2009 at 11:36 PM
So I guess it’s ok for me to smoke where I want. I’m sure you oppose the FDA bill.
BacaDog on June 12, 2009 at 11:36 PM
Dont’t know if any one has addressed this yet, but I saw this earlier live on OR, but in the second clip at approx 1:39-while they are speaking over each other—Joan clearly states ” Don’t demonize me my friend you will be sorry“.
Wonder if Bill caught this–Sounds like a direct threat to me……
Ladywolfnl on June 12, 2009 at 11:38 PM
They deserve each other.
RobCon on June 12, 2009 at 11:40 PM
I kind of miss the days of excommunications. Is the Catholic Church so desparate for money that they have to allow women like her and Pelosi to speak for the church as Catholics? If you believe in abortion – and that’s your right – why cling to a religion that condemns it clearly. there’s no gray area here. Join a different church if you believe in abortion. But the bottom line is – if you consider a man who aborts late term babies because the mother-to-be has a headache (and that was one of the reasons he cited) – a hero? You’re kind of sick. You can say he was doing his job and it was legal – but a hero? He was rich because he provided a procedure that you could not get anywhere else.
.
No one rational who is pro-life supports murder – of any kind.
BrideOfRove on June 12, 2009 at 11:42 PM
Killing Jews happened a lot in Germany in the 1940′s.
But, dont judge them cause…um…it was legal.
The Final Cut on June 12, 2009 at 11:44 PM
Statistics say 1 in 4 women between the ages of 15-64 have had abortions. Factor in the number of friends/parents/boyfriends/husbands who have encouraged/pressured/helped them do it and you have a lot of guilt rolling around out there. Some turn the guilt in on themselves, like your friend and others turn it into anger and hatred towards anyone who makes them feel it. I have no doubt abortion is behind the insane hatred of Sarah Palin. I would lay money on David Letterman having secured an abortion or two explaining his deranged hatred of Sarah. I could be wrong, but I doubt it.
I pity these people. Can you even imagine the horror of knowing that is on your soul? That you willfully killed your own child? There just aren’t words…It is no wonder so many are either bitter and hateful and just messed up, or have finally turned to programs like Rachel’s Vineyard for help. The Planned Parenthood folks refuse to admit the emotional trama abortion causes, but if it isn’t real, why are Silent No More and Rachel’s Vineyard and the like growing?
I’m happy for your friend.
pannw on June 12, 2009 at 11:46 PM
The Left is drunk on its own power doing what it always does when it has such a favorable balance of power.
This is what we see happening every day on college campuses…
18-1 on June 12, 2009 at 11:48 PM
If a late term fetus has no rights when a woman doesn’t want her baby, then it also has no rights when a woman does want her baby. By example, if a late-term fetus dies from wrong meds administered by a doctor or nurse, there is no murder and the woman has no recourse to malpractice because the late-term fetus legally has no rights and is a non-entity.
“Legally”, you cannot give “wrong” meds to something that has no rights to “right” meds, and you cannot bring harm to a non-entity. You can’t selectively declare fetuses to have or not have rights based on whether the mother wants it or not.
Or can you? Any lawyers out there want to explain the “legality” of non-rights for fetuses?
Btw, if fetuses have no rights and are non-entities, why is so much biomed R&D, health care, and funding dedicated to caring for them? And what status do non-entity, and without rights fetuses have under the new universal healthcare mantras? Or as “non-entities”, will they not qualify for medical rights and privileges under this same liberal way of thinking?
orville on June 12, 2009 at 11:50 PM
The first part got to me. My nephews widow kept in touch with me after he and their toddler son were killed in an accident. She eventually married again and got pregnant 3 times.
During her 3rd pregnancy she developed a brain tumor. The Doctors wanted to abort the baby but she refused. She had lost one child.. she said she was not going to let another one die. She had the child and it survived. She did not.
It took so much courage for her to make that decision to keep her baby. She knew what losing her first child had felt like, she knew life was precious and she gave her life up so her baby could live. I will never forget that about her.
GoodBoy on June 12, 2009 at 11:52 PM
hahahha – that’s who she reminded me of…hahahha
poppieseeds on June 12, 2009 at 11:52 PM
Pfamis, thankyou that was by far the funniest thing I have heard all day. Not to mention dead on LOL
LSUMama on June 12, 2009 at 11:52 PM
lol I saw this earlier when it happened and remember wondering why Bill O’Reilly feels it is necessary to get into shouting matches with people he strongly disagrees with. Perhaps it is his version of a tough interview although I suspect that all it does is to make him look like a brow beating bully.
Then again the woman he was interviewing was little better, resorting to making statements purely for shock value and at one point even threatening O’Rielly with some sort of activist payback if he didn’t back off.
All together a very entertaining exchange but very light on substance and another example of why Bill O’Reilly isn’t as good he thinks he is when it comes to his interview style as well as a clear demonstration of just how unhinged and unreasonable far left activists tend to be.
Hellrider on June 12, 2009 at 11:54 PM
Well fine. You take your legal and I’ll take my morals.
proudteadrinker on June 12, 2009 at 11:54 PM
I notice Salon is pushing Hispanic dominance at their site.
How do Hispanics feel about abortion JOAN?
RobCon on June 12, 2009 at 11:57 PM
I realize Hitler comparisons get thrown around a bit too much these days, but I feel it’s warranted here. I cannot fathom how anyone, even pro-choice, would ever think it’s okay to murder a late term fetus because the mother doesn’t want to be inconvenienced. That woman would have been right at home in the Third Reich, no question. The more I read about progressives, the more disgusted I become.
As for O’Reilly, I’m about 50/50 on him most of the time, but tonight- he gets a standing ovation from me.
alwaysright43 on June 12, 2009 at 11:58 PM
Slavery was legal JOAN!
RobCon on June 12, 2009 at 11:58 PM
GoodBoy –
Thank you for sharing. Life is precious and a gift beyond measure.
txmomof6 on June 13, 2009 at 12:01 AM
The data doesn’t back you up:
•71% — Woman didn’t recognize she was pregnant or misjudged gestation
•48% — Woman found it hard to make arrangements for abortion
•33% — Woman was afraid to tell her partner or parents
•24% — Woman took time to decide to have an abortion
•8% — Woman waited for her relationship to change
•8% — Someone pressured woman not to have abortion
•6% — Something changed after woman became pregnant
•6% — Woman didn’t know timing is important
•5% — Woman didn’t know she could get an abortion
•2% — A fetal problem was diagnosed late in pregnancy
•11% — Other
Fetal illness is listed infrequently as a reason, indicating that maybe these heart-wrenching stories are not typical. And saving the life or health of the mother wasn’t mentioned at all. Points for the pro-life side.
http://blog.beliefnet.com/stevenwaldman/2009/06/the-murder-of-george-tiller.html
Dreadnought on June 13, 2009 at 12:04 AM
http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2008/Jul/28/church-shooting-police-find-manifesto-suspects-car/
Red State State of Mind on June 13, 2009 at 12:05 AM
Yeah, verily, the “progressives” historically want to get rid of the “useless eaters”, and abortion is a means of population control, so is limiting health care for old folks,…and gulags
zekero on June 13, 2009 at 12:11 AM
I watched this segment and I have to say, I laughed out loud for most of it. It was hilarious. You just knew his head would pop at some moment and that she’d be some hateful, mindless, left-wing zombie with a list of Daily Kos talking points — all of which were useless.
At one point I walked into the back bedroom of the house and into the closet to grab some laundry and I could still hear them yelling at each other… it was gold, baby!
D2Boston on June 13, 2009 at 12:11 AM
O’Reilly was right on — he sounded like the old O’Reilly.
Those leftist creeps hide behind the legalisms they created as a substitute for morality, and O’Reilly didn’t let her get away with it.
Feedie on June 13, 2009 at 12:18 AM
<em>I notice Salon is pushing Hispanic dominance at their site.
How do Hispanics feel about abortion JOAN?
Hispanics by and large are conservative and anti-abortion, this is why it’s stupid for Repblicans(like Mike Murphy)spew forth about how ” the party needs to embrace immigration reform,and suck up to Hispanics, blah,blah blah…”
If McCain had made Obammy’s views on abortion more well known, I would bet the “Hispanic” vote would have not have been so skewed.
zekero on June 13, 2009 at 12:20 AM
In some countries, beating a woman if she disobeys you is legal. Let’s pass the hat and send Joan on a trip so she can see just how important legality really is.
Jim Treacher on June 13, 2009 at 12:23 AM
Right on. Good News is so appreciated these days!
Not right on. Edith, it is true, was a dimwit at times – but Archie’s better half had a heart of gold.
Best damn Orville moment since the Wright Bros. took flight.
Yes… the “progressives” call us to help them sweep the
childcrap under the rug, not offer “win-win” solutions like adoption (which works wonderfully well for the children).T J Green on June 13, 2009 at 12:25 AM
O’Reilly is a Drama Queen buffoon. An embarrassment. Acts like this so he can stretch this segment into next week’s “Body Language” segment (“Now look what I’m doing here”) and replay this segment endlessly so Meghan can tell him what she thinks of him.
Marcus on June 13, 2009 at 12:33 AM
Bwahahahaha, O’Reilly makes me smile…that was awesome!
CheeksMagee on June 13, 2009 at 12:35 AM
That’s true not only of hispanics, but of moderates in general.
Consider how leftwing CA voted on Prop 8 (gay marriage) and leftwing MA voted on Prop 1 (taxes).
Also consider Obama talked a lot about how he was going to give money away and raise taxes on “the rich”, he didn’t talk much about his support for 4th trimester abortions and he still publicly opposes gay marriage.
18-1 on June 13, 2009 at 12:40 AM
Hey, Walsh.
What O’Reilly does is LEGAL.
So by your standard, there’s nothing wrong here.
J.E. Dyer on June 13, 2009 at 12:51 AM
Liberals always cling to the legal argument when it suits their purpose. It’s the old German argument slightly modified. “I was only following Hitler’s orders and, besides, killing Jews was legal.” When liberals are legally outvoted, then the result is “unconstitutional” to be henceforth overturned by some misguided judge or legislator.
Not even rats living in a city dump kill their own young. Only liberals.
MaiDee on June 13, 2009 at 1:06 AM
Late-term abortions, ahhh so dear to my heart, since my daughter was a micropreemie, 24 weeks, 1 pound 5 oz, but hey, please keep on offing her brethen of third-trimester younglings just because they are “unwanted”
thebrokenrattle on June 13, 2009 at 1:35 AM
Walsh is a scumbag who defends a scumbag murderer of innocents.
Tiller is no different than Josef Mengele, Eduard Wirths or Aribert Heim, all NAZIs who performed experiments on late-term fetuses.
If Mengele, Wirths or Heim had been assassinated in 1940, the assassin would have been a world-wide hero.
I don’t advocate assassination but I have to admit, I did a little dance in joy when I heard that Tiller the Baby Killer has been killed, just as i would have if Mengele, Wirths or Heim had been killed.
Has anyone noticed, that giving FACTS to the public now makes one an accessory to murder, according to these nutroot leftists?
nelsonknows on June 13, 2009 at 1:48 AM
“Don’t Demonized me, you’ll be sorry”. Yikes. Sounds like a threat.
stackedeck on June 13, 2009 at 2:02 AM
By Dr. Tiller’s own testimony, he performed 350-400 late term abortions in 2003, at a cost of $6000 each. Methinks he was helping himself a whole lot more than he was “helping women”.
oldoldbabs on June 13, 2009 at 2:21 AM
But why don’t they hold the mothers responsible?
I didn’t hear either of them lay the blame on the mothers – who are paying big bucks to do this.
What’s up with that?
AprilOrit on June 13, 2009 at 2:29 AM
But here’s my problem with this – he doesn’t lay the blame where it rightfully belongs – at the mother’s feet.
To hear him speak you would think Tiller was hunting women down to eradicate their babies.
No no no, it was the other way around, they sought him out for his services, they contracted him to do the deed.
What say you Bill – to these women?
It’s like he doesn’t have the balls to go to the real source.
It’s like the drug problem in America. People tend to blame the dealers – and not the idiots paying for the drugs and keeping them in business.
If people wouldn’t buy the drugs the dealers would be out of business.
Or the same goes for these tabloids like the Enquirer or The Globe. If the public wouldn’t buy theese dirt sheets, they would disappear.
The same applies to Tiller and the others who do this.
The women hold most of the responsibility.
O’Reilly should man up and call a spade a spade.
AprilOrit on June 13, 2009 at 2:40 AM
I keep hearing (and reading here) about what Dr. tiller was doing is legal. The truth is if he was performing late term abortions for flimsy reasons then it was not legal even in Kansas. Just because he was not convicted of a crime does not make his actions legal. Just because you rob a bank or do drugs but are never convicted does not make your actions legal. From everything I have read on the case in Kansas there was a lot of political pressure to insure that he was not convicted. That does not absolve him of having committed criminal acts it just means he was connected to the right people.
Being a non-catholic I am confused by one statement though and maybe you all can translate. What exactly is a pro choice catholic? From what little I know about the Catholic Church is not being pro choice a big no no? So wouldn’t a pro choice Catholic be an oxymoron?
JKotthoff on June 13, 2009 at 2:58 AM
Thanks for playing, but your weak minded feeble attempts at making any sort of logical point have been throughly refuted.
LOL@YOU
(I will say that I am impressed that you actually spelled “equality” correctly for your username. Bravo Einsten.)
StockOption on June 13, 2009 at 3:34 AM
The best part was when she says, “don’t you demonize me, or you’ll be sorry!”
What’s she going to do? Write another hit piece?
jonezee on June 13, 2009 at 3:48 AM
Sometimes the animals know better.
Feedie on June 13, 2009 at 4:00 AM
Late term abortion is legal in EVERY state so long as the reason for the abortion meet the test of “the mothers health” is in jeopardy.
What look odd with Teller is the woman had to pay him $6000.00 fort an abortion that would be free in every state so long as the mothers health” is in jeopardy.
If the reason for the late term abortion is real, is true then why pay Tiller $6K for something that is free?
DSchoen on June 13, 2009 at 5:20 AM
I got a kick at her trying to be some crusader against hate and trying to “police” Bill’O for calling out what Tiller did and she comes right out and threatens him. The left doesn’t even try anymore do they?
Rbastid on June 13, 2009 at 5:23 AM
I have to hand it to Walsh (unlike most left wingers, she doesn’t take pot shots and then hides) for showing up on O’Reilly for what was sure to be a contentious interview.
It took her long enough to concede the obvious, that she wants late term abortions available everywhere and for any reason and Tiller was just going (a secular) God’s work. There is no moral bar – as long as it meets the legal bar we pro-lifers should live and let…um…die…and just shut up.
CarolynM on June 13, 2009 at 6:36 AM
This lady says that lefties do not inpsire violence.
What about the Muslim who killed the soldier? If you listen to what he said it was obvious he was reacting to stories about soldiers abusing Iraqis. What about all the acts of violence perpetrated by environmentalist radicals? Arson can kill people too. And with Al Gore out there telling them that the human race is a goner if we do not change our ways..how do we know he did not inspire some of that?
And you know what? I think that a lot of the suicide bombings in places like Iraq have been egged on by people like Michael Moore who have given terrorists reason to believe that violence works.
I think it is interesting that every time a Democrat in the White House we see this kind of stuff. I think of Waco and I wonder what would have happened if Bush had given an order that got 87 Americans killed right here in the US.
Terrye on June 13, 2009 at 7:10 AM
I mean really, what if some guy shoots O’Reilley, can we blame this woman? Using her logic he is the menace, and yet what he is doing is perfectly legal. What is more it is legal in every state, not just 13 of them.
Terrye on June 13, 2009 at 7:14 AM
Me, I’m wondering what happens under 0bamacare when you want to have a baby who’s been diagnosed with Downs or Cystic Fibrosis or some other condition that will be expensive for your government healthcare plan.
Gee, could that be because it doesn’t improve the mother’s health one iota to kill the baby instead of letting it live? (Speaking here as a woman with a health problem that required delivery of a preemie – and hey, we BOTH made it.)
Quisp on June 13, 2009 at 7:24 AM
My Lutheran approach would be different. I would argue natural law, the law God has written upon the hearts of all human beings, including non-believers. Unless they really have undergone a moral lobotomy they should be open to this story: Down in Wichita, Kansas, there is a physician by the name of George Tiller. On his website he boasts that he has already performed 60,000 abortions, mostly late-term, and week after week he is killing 100 more unborn babies.
Dr. Tiller does not think of these fetuses as clusters of cancerous cells. He knows they are human because he baptizes some of them before he incinerates them in his own crematorium. You don’t baptize non-humans. Dr. Tiller knows that. He is a practicing Lutheran. His former congregation, Holy Cross of the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod, excommunicated him as an unrepentant sinner. But the Lutheran Church of the Reformation, which belongs to the ELCA, communes him. Did I mention that he kills 100 human beings every week and has already done away with 60.000? Sixty thousand! In Nuremberg they hanged some fiends for murdering less than 60 — zero point one percent of Tiller’s toll.
Perhaps this little tale will give even non-believers pause if they have not discarded their conscience, known to Christians as the law God has written upon every man’s heart. One day, of this I am certain, this will indeed result in collective shame – and God knows what other horrible consequences.
OmahaConservative on June 13, 2009 at 7:40 AM
http://www.dr-tiller.com/rites.htm
OmahaConservative on June 13, 2009 at 7:46 AM
well, what he was doing was no “legal” he just had a liberal governor that would not prosecute him
Donut on June 13, 2009 at 7:49 AM
She has different stories. She lies.
Substantial and ireversible harm. This diagnosis was done by Tillerman looking up at the mother thru the stirrups. He is not a Psych.
This woman has irreversible ignorance. killing 60,000 is as bad as it gets. Killing babies is brutal.
seven on June 13, 2009 at 8:22 AM
He spent millions putting her in office with Morrison a sex convicted Attorney General. Sebelious would refuse to sign a bill to clean up abortuaries to the inspected standards veterinarians have.
seven on June 13, 2009 at 8:23 AM
The term Pro-choice Catholic is an oxymoron.
Jason58 on June 13, 2009 at 8:30 AM
It may be demonization but it is LEGAL! This is AMERICA you do not demonize people doing something LEGAL (like demonization) that you oppose.
Geochelone on June 13, 2009 at 8:38 AM
In some countries, it is legal to beat your wife to a pulp or have sex with children. It would be a weak argument to say that those who do such things are good people just because they are in conformity with horrible laws.
Claudin on June 13, 2009 at 8:40 AM
From the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America website:
http://www.elca.org/What-We-Believe/Social-Issues/Social-Statements/Abortion.aspx
“I. Our Unity and Diversity in Christ
C. Talking about Our Differences
A developing life in the womb does not have an absolute right to be born,…
II. Convictions of our Faith
Some basic faith convictions undergird our judgments on abortion:
“Human life in all phases of its development is God-given and, therefore, has intrinsic value, worth, and dignity.
III. The Church as a Community Supportive of Life
Because we believe that God is the creator of life, the number of induced abortions is a source of deep concern to this church.
This church encourages and seeks to support adoption as a positive option to abortion.
B. Ending a Pregnancy
Although abortion raises significant moral issues at any stage of fetal development, the closer the life in the womb comes to full term the more serious such issues become.[F] When a child can survive outside a womb, it becomes possible for other people, and not only the mother, to nourish and care for the child. This church opposes ending intrauterine life when a fetus is developed enough to live outside a uterus with the aid of reasonable and necessary technology. If a pregnancy needs to be interrupted after this point, every reasonable and necessary effort should be made to support this life, unless there are lethal fetal abnormalities indicating that the prospective newborn will die very soon.
Because of our conviction that both the life of the woman and the life in her womb must be respected by law, this church opposes:
* the total lack of regulation of abortion;
* laws that are primarily intended to harass those contemplating or deciding for an abortion.
…this church supports legislation that prohibits abortions that are performed after the fetus is determined to be viable, except when the mother’s life is threatened or when lethal abnormalities indicate the prospective newborn will die very soon.
Beyond these situations, this church neither supports nor opposes laws prohibiting abortion.
Abortion is not acceptable later than the first trimester.”
The ELCA is just another social club that meets in a building which sports a steeple. Dr. Tiller was a member in good standing in spite of the fact that his “church” was well aware of his activities.
oldleprechaun on June 13, 2009 at 8:42 AM
http://www.getreligion.org/?p=13316
Tiller’s missing excommunication
“Last Sunday, late-term abortion doctor George Tiller was gunned down in the foyer of his Lutheran church, where he served as an usher. As anyone with even a cursory understanding of Lutheranism in America could surmise, that church was a member of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America. Of the various Lutheran church bodies in America, the ELCA is the most mainline and has the most supportive position on legalized abortion.
As soon as the terrible news about Tiller’s murder hit the wire, many bloggers and liberal pundits noted that Tiller’s active church membership was at odds with the stereotype of how abortion and religion are related. It didn’t take long for that same meme to make it to the mainstream media stories.
What none of these stories have explained is that Tiller had previously been excommunicated by a Lutheran congregation on account of his lack of repentance about and refusal to stop his occupation. That Lutheran congregation was a member of my church body, the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod. Excommunication doesn’t happen terribly frequently in this day and age but it’s not unheard of. I don’t know any of the specifics about his past congregation or what led to the discipline and anticipated learning more about it when it was covered by the mainstream media. Unfortunately, that hasn’t happened.
When the news broke, I had many people who know that I’m Lutheran ask how it was possible that his church had not disciplined him or otherwise encouraged him to stop performing abortions. I had hoped that there would be stories exploring Tiller’s religious beliefs and church membership and that the stories would explain the difference between the ELCA and the LCMS. There is obviously quite a difference between a church body that would discipline a practicing abortion doctor and one that would welcome him in membership.
While we did get some stories about his religious views, none of them seemed to have any clue about his religious history. Note, for instance, this piece from the Salt Lake Tribune that was written Religion News Service’s Lindsay Perna and Tiffany Stanley:
Dr. George Tiller’s murder last Sunday morning in the lobby of his Lutheran church counters the secular image of a late-term abortion provider, pinning him more as a churchgoing “martyr” than a godless murderer.
Shot and killed while passing out bulletins in the lobby of his Wichita, Kan., church as his wife sat in the choir, Tiller is already challenging popular perceptions of both abortion providers and the abortion-rights movement.
“It shows a dimension of the movement that a lot of people don’t know about,” said the Rev. Carlton Veazey, president of the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice. “This man was castigated for what he did — but he was a faithful member of the Lutheran church and that gives a different view of him and his work.”
Veazey sees the face of Tiller as more of “a martyr in the same sense that Dr. [Martin Luther] King was.”
The story goes on to quote various people about how Tiller’s church membership changes the dynamics of the abortion debate. How can they not mention that he was previously excommunicated for his abortion work? It’s such an interesting and significant part of the story! That’s just a huge hole.
Also, the pro-life people who are quoted in the story are of the Randall Terry variety. With the typical pro-choice activists and typical pro-life activists quoted, the story remains in the muck of “bumper sticker” rhetoric. It’s disappointing. (Robin Abcarian’s piece in the Los Angeles Times dealt solely with the Tiller funeral, which means its sympathetic tone is more appropriate. It also took the ‘Tiller busts stereotypes’ approach.)
After Dr. Tiller’s murder, some pundits were confused about how people who see abortion as the unjust killing of babies could also oppose the murder of someone who killed those babies. Here was one such essay written by a fellow libertarian. I saw one letter to the editor written by clergymen in my church body that addressed just that issue:
There is an old saying: Two wrongs don’t make a right. This does not appear in the Bible but it certainly reflects a scriptural idea. This concept, that two wrongs don’t make a right, is certainly true in the case of the murder of Dr. George Tiller.
Dr. Tiller was an infamous abortionist, who was one of the very few in the country who would perform late-term abortions. The Lutheran Church – Missouri Synod is strongly pro-life, and condemns the practice of abortion. Dr. Tiller, a former member of a Missouri Synod congregation, was excommunicated by that congregation for his abortion practice. (The congregation he was currently attending is part of another Lutheran body.) We stand by that action. Our sister congregation acted properly in disciplining Dr. Tiller. Such action is always intended to lead a person to see their sins and come to repentance. Excommunication is never intended to bring that person harm.
While we condemn Dr. Tiller’s actions as an abortionist, we just as strongly condemn the actions of the person who took his life. Murder, even of a murderer, is never acceptable. God teaches us in Romans 13 and other places, that the government is in place to enforce justice. We are never to take private vengeance. This is simply not given to private individuals. Murder in any circumstances is a grievous sin. It was our utmost desire that Dr. Tiller come to repentance, and perhaps in time he may have. We do not know. Only God sees all ends. Sadly, because of this heinous act of violence, Dr. Tiller no longer has that opportunity.
I can’t help but think that some enterprising reporter should look at how the two Lutheran church bodies handled Dr. Tiller’s occupation differently. It’s disappointing to read that RNS story in light of this rather dramatic back story.”
OmahaConservative on June 13, 2009 at 8:51 AM
Thanks, Dreadnought, for the rational response. I don’t mean to sound snide when I tell you should read more carefully the article you site. It was well worth the read! The basic point of the article was the choices actually confronted on women who abort in the third trimester. The article claims that the frequent reason is that if the fetus is born, the baby will have a short painful life. I don’t blame a woman one bit for making such a decision. And Tiller is a saint for helping women in such situations at risk to his own life. As far as the statistics you cite go, they are old and they include the far more frequent second trimester abortions. Thus, they don’t really tell us anything about third trimester abortions.
The last sentence from http://blog.beliefnet.com/stevenwaldman/2009/06/the-murder-of-george-tiller.html is the most relevant if we ever want consensus on the issue of third trimester abortions:
“Perhaps the lesson from this renewed wave of attention to late term abortions is that we might want to understand what’s actually happening before we attack the other side.”
thuja on June 13, 2009 at 8:58 AM
Pro-abortion Ten Commandments:
1. Until birth, or sometime thereafter, the baby is a “fetus”, devoid of life, identity and/or rights, just like a wart or a fingernail.
2. The woman’s reproductive rights are unassailable and limitless.
3. Once pregnant, a woman has zero responsibilities, just freedoms.
4. No man has any right to have any say in the pregnancy of any woman, ever, unless he is aborting the fetus.
5. If it’s legal, there is no debate. (This is part of a bigger discussion, as morality has been killed, and has nothing to do with the law. Since laws don’t have to be morals-based, they can be based on anything or nothing, so anything can be made legal by legislators or, preferably and unconstitutionally, the courts. This is how Hitler made the Holocaust, which was legal in Germany at the time, happen.)
6. The right to abortion is sacrosanct, unquestionable and cannot be limited. It’s in the Constitution. Somewhere. Trust me, the Supreme Court found it. Just don’t read the thing, it’s in there, honest. Any rights that are really in the Constitution and don’t have to be “discovered” by people wiser than us, well, they’re not really so important. Free speech, the right to bear arms, limiting the size and power of the Federal government, well, forget all that nonsense. The Constitution is a living document, remember?
7. We aren’t “pro-abortion”. We are “pro-choice”. Just so long as the only choice is abortion.
8. Abortion doctors are heroes. The US military, police, people who shoot criminals, pharmaceutical companies that create miracle drugs, priests, ministers, and Ronald Reagan are worse than Hitler.
9. Abortion was legalized to eliminate all those back-alley abortions. There were literally hundreds of deaths from back-alley abortions before Roe v Wade out of tens of thousands of illegal abortions annually in the US. The result of Roe v Wade: 49,551,703 abortions in the US! That’s a great tradeoff!
10. Anyone questioning abortion rights is a fascist.
stonemeister on June 13, 2009 at 9:36 AM
+100
bluelightbrigade on June 13, 2009 at 9:45 AM
O’Reilly is an ass, but he nailed her there. She showed her true colors.
Stickeehands on June 13, 2009 at 9:48 AM
1850, or thereabouts. (Antebellum) Then again in the 1950′s & 60s (Civil Rights in the South).
Dissent is patriotism.
Or did u forget that?
bluelightbrigade on June 13, 2009 at 9:49 AM
Christ, it’s like these trolls sleep through history and only wake up in time for their Greenpeace meetings.
bluelightbrigade on June 13, 2009 at 9:51 AM
Sometimes there are conflicts between what the majority of Americans want and what the Vatican wants. An American Catholic has to deal with both.
In many ways the American Revolution was motivated by distrust of the Vatican and the perception that laws like the Quebec Act would increase the influence of the Pope in the US and reduce religious freedom.
The issue of divided loyalty for Catholics was still enough of an issue in 1960 that JFK had to assert that his priority was the “national interest” and his oath as a public servant was to to the Constitution.
dedalus on June 13, 2009 at 9:58 AM
At 3:24 in the second video,
The mother? The definition of mother is “a female parent.” The definition of parent is one that begets or brings forth offspring; a person who brings up and cares for another.”
So, I ask again. The mother? How can those on the left justify using such language when they often refer to the fetus as a parasite? If the fetus is a parasite, then the woman it is inside is just a “host.” Mother’s raise, nurture, and protect their children. Mother’s don’t kill their children, because it will prevent her from playing sports. Joan Walsh is disgusting.
Stickeehands on June 13, 2009 at 10:05 AM
Uh, you guys did the same thing th Bush for 8 years. When did he ever break the law?
BTW, getalife called looking for you. Her diaper needs changing again.
Del Dolemonte on June 13, 2009 at 10:12 AM
Two points. First, doesn’t lefty women look particularily ugly. Second, feel sorry for this ugly bag, she’ll be roasting in a hotter place forever.
Jeff from WI on June 13, 2009 at 10:15 AM
Yes, They always do…
OmahaConservative on June 13, 2009 at 10:21 AM
Bill definitely went overboard on her, but she asked for it. Especially when she used the vapid “it’s legal” argument. I’m sure she held Bill Clinton’s felony perjury to be above the law. All feminists did, even though he had already had his Justice Dept. successfully prosecute a woman Federal employee for lying under oath about sex the same way he did.
I’m sure she’ll write in Salon that she cleaned his clock, but since their stock price is about the same as the NY Times who cares?
Del Dolemonte on June 13, 2009 at 10:24 AM
I was screaming at the TV. Using HER logic, she must of approved of SLAVERY before the Emancipation Proclamation since slavery was LEGAL.
Jeff from WI on June 13, 2009 at 10:29 AM
Those who castigate O’Reilly for being a blowhard are only helping the pro-abort Obama lovers.
They are missing the point that O’Reilly should be hailed and celebrated for breaking the Media Code of Silence – the complete censorship on the truth of abortion, a blackout carried out since the time of Roe v Wade.
BOR exposed the entire culture of death and defended Tiller’s unborn victims by stating facts that have not seen the light of day in the media in 36 years.
Namely, Tiller was a baby killer; that these unborn children do have rights and that THEIR BLOOD is on Walsh’s hands because she promotes this atrocity, while claiming to be a “pro-choice Catholic”. Sorry, but that is a contradiction in terms. No such thing.
To my knowlege, no one on television has ever told the truth about abortion as Bill O’Reilly has regarding Tiller.
I hope he will also discover the power of the image in showing what aborted babies actually look like. Most people have no mental image whatsoever. This is normal; abortion is not a natural act and is not something we can visualize. However, we should know. Knowledge is power. When we saw what happened in Hitler’s death camps it brought many to justice at Nuremburg.
There are some powerful images (be prepared) at priestsforlife.org
tigerlily on June 13, 2009 at 10:41 AM
I think this is why the left are so hateful, and demeaning, and angry all the time.
Living with pent up guilt over their “beliefs”, and trying desperately to get everyone to agree with those beliefs, to alleviate that guilt.
Why is it, when a pregnant woman is murdered, and her unborn baby dies as well, that constitutes a double homicide. But aborting late term, just because mommy decides she doesn’t want to change diapers, isn’t murder? The warped mind is the only mind that can rationalize this.
capejasmine on June 13, 2009 at 10:41 AM
OmahaConservative
What you wrote was great-but just one clarification.
Tiller’s church was Reformation Lutheran Church-which is a part of ELCA.
the Lutheran church of the Reformation on the other hand-is an off-shoot of the Missouri Synod and is VERY conservative.
My best friend is in the LCR and she’s further to the right than I am.
annoyinglittletwerp on June 13, 2009 at 10:47 AM
Never. Why are you so easy to give up your morality? Shutting up only enables more abortions. Rather the law changes or not, by people continuing to air their moral views options are brought to the woman who has been given the right of choice. All options need to available and never …. just shut up. NEVER!
Wade on June 13, 2009 at 10:50 AM
Perhaps by similar logic we could come to view slavery as wrong, but when we change the law not punish people who had held slaves while it was legal.
dedalus on June 13, 2009 at 10:51 AM
This skank would have made a great Nazi.
bill30097 on June 13, 2009 at 10:54 AM
It took O’Reilly berating until she told the truth of her beliefs. She never would have come clean without O’Reilly taking her down the path to the truth. Kinda like the movie “A Few Good Men”. Had to uncover a lot of bullshit to uncover the truth. Bill owned her.
Wade on June 13, 2009 at 10:58 AM
My daughter was six to seven weeks early. Tiller would have had no issue with aborting her if my wife felt she was having mental issues.
keyboarddude on June 13, 2009 at 11:04 AM
Why don’t you confront the mothers??
AprilOrit on June 13, 2009 at 11:07 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 Next »