Twitter – the new blogging, social revolution, or pointless chatter?
posted at 6:55 pm on June 10, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Howard Kurtz asked a question on Twitter yesterday about the nature of the relatively new communication network:
Q: Is Twitter just a fun hangout, or do you buy the Time-cover argument that it’s changing the way we communicate and get information?
Time’s managing editor Richard Stangel warned readers to avoid dismissing Twitter as a social phenomenon:
At 7:45 A.M. on June 4, Steven Johnson sent a tweet to his more than 500,000 followers on Twitter, informing them that he had written this week’s cover story about how Twitter is changing the way society communicates. That tweet is also this week’s cover image. I know this is all a bit meta and like trying to capture digital lightning in a jar, but we thought it was a way of illustrating how new platforms and social networks are changing the way we communicate and live. …
Historically, the most powerful new mediums have changed the way we perceive the world–and how we relate to one another. The telephone, television and Internet have done that in ways we are still processing. But technology itself is neutral. It’s a tool, neither good nor evil. It’s all in how we use it. Twitter itself may continue to rise or it may go away, but its characteristics–real-time conversation, instant links, groups of followers–will affect the platforms that come after. There’s a lesson in that for all of us in the media, for we must adapt to new technology, and not simply by putting the same old wine in new bottles.
I’ve been on Twitter for a short while now, and have almost 2500 followers, which barely makes a dent in the Twittersphere. It took me a while to enjoy Twitter, but I’ve grown to like it, and Howard’s question got me wondering what I found attractive about Twitter. For me, it fills a vacuum that home officing creates.
Two years ago, I left the corporate world and began working from home — which I love. No more commutes, lower insurance rates, a fill-up a month at the gas station, no bumper-to-bumper traffic — it’s almost all good. What I do miss is the opportunity to socialize with people at the office; in easy slang, to hang out at the water cooler. That socialization was fairly superficial, but we could exchange a few jokes, talk about current events, and let people know about breaking news, all in a short period of time every day. Home officing removed that easy, light interaction that I missed, until Twitter.
Many people now work outside of traditional office environments, and most of them probably miss that water-cooler conversation as much as I did. Now we can have it, just as we did at the office, with whomever is gathered around the Twitter water cooler at the moment. What’s more, the Twitter environment is more egalitarian than the corporate water cooler, where people stratified by rank. On Twitter, we’re all equals.
Does that make Twitter a communications revolution? Not really, but it does fill a niche in the modern economy. Twitter won’t replace blogs, news media, or even water coolers, but it does provide that social outlet for a distributed workforce that didn’t exist before.
Update: I got this comment on Twitter from Teresa:
Agree with you re Twitter as someone who is stay at home Mom. Most of my twit friends work at home. Love it as water cooler.
Hadn’t thought about it for stay-at-home moms. Great point.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
Pointless chatter.
t.ferg on June 10, 2009 at 6:56 PM
Twittering Tweets!!!!!!!
canopfor on June 10, 2009 at 6:57 PM
Ain’t got. Don’t want.
Limerick on June 10, 2009 at 6:57 PM
Like most, I hated Twitter before I even tried it. It grows on you big time…
jjraines on June 10, 2009 at 6:58 PM
“I just took a dump”
“Going to the grocery store”
Who gives a crap WHAT you’re doing?
I certainly don’t.
omnipotent on June 10, 2009 at 6:59 PM
I’ll go with pointless chatter for $200, Alex.
califcon on June 10, 2009 at 7:00 PM
Personally, I prefer Facebook.
jgapinoy on June 10, 2009 at 7:00 PM
Information seems to flow faster on Twitter. Since I’m a political junkie, I find so much valuable information following all my favorite conservative pundits and news people like Tapper.
Christina_M on June 10, 2009 at 7:00 PM
I find it a good source of breaking news, keeping up with certain blogs. Don’t use it for idle chatter.
JammieWearingFool on June 10, 2009 at 7:01 PM
Whats wrong with!
(… —…)!
canopfor on June 10, 2009 at 7:01 PM
Yeah but that’s not what most people post. It’s less about what you’re doing and more of a mini-blog of thoughts and relevant links.
jjraines on June 10, 2009 at 7:01 PM
I use Twitter to harass moonbats and promote blog posts from all over. I have IM for “chatter”.
Snooper on June 10, 2009 at 7:01 PM
I like the chatter on here. I have no intentions of getting a Twitter thingdoodle.
SouthernGent on June 10, 2009 at 7:02 PM
I do not participate in Twitter, although I did open an account during one of Hugh Hewitt’s rants about how I was going to be left behind in during the Twitter Rapture.
I work at home too and used to have some pangs of need for socialization but I get that here now.
myrenovations on June 10, 2009 at 7:02 PM
Ugh,my lame attempt at morse code!
(…- – - …).
canopfor on June 10, 2009 at 7:03 PM
Pointless chatter.
Skywise on June 10, 2009 at 7:03 PM
Pointless chatter!
christene on June 10, 2009 at 7:03 PM
Pointless chatter.
elduende on June 10, 2009 at 7:05 PM
Did MySpace revolutionize our society? If not, then neither has Twitter. I’ll put my chips on the negative.
Black Yoshi on June 10, 2009 at 7:05 PM
i just watched Twitter’s intro video for the 1st time.
Pointless chatter.
jgapinoy on June 10, 2009 at 7:05 PM
Pointless chatter. Though I do have to admit I have an account but it’s only to follow and read up on some links.
Savrielle on June 10, 2009 at 7:05 PM
I just hope that Twitter will replace the loud obnoxious cell phone attached to the ear of rude people who seem to believe I have some overwhelming need to listen to their conversation.
Texas Gal on June 10, 2009 at 7:06 PM
Right now, there is no better source for real time breaking news than Twitter.
SnarkVader on June 10, 2009 at 7:06 PM
I use twitter to put out news story that dont always get place on the blogs here or I get to them first.
William Amos on June 10, 2009 at 7:06 PM
I absolutely love Twitter. I do get breaking news as fast as getting it in Drudge Report. You get links to interesting stories and get to discuss hot button issues in a pithy manner.
Plus it is always fun to read Jim Treacher’s tweets.
jencab on June 10, 2009 at 7:07 PM
I don’t even own a Twitter machine.
Bugler on June 10, 2009 at 7:09 PM
Well, I got here from Ed’s Twitter feed, so it must be good for something.
Jeff M (Formerly Jeff_McAwesome) on June 10, 2009 at 7:09 PM
DITTO.
I don’t “love” twitter, however, due to the intense spam-ho accounts, but I do find it very informative if/as time permits to read headlines/links and such (very useful, in fact, in that latter regard).
Lourdes on June 10, 2009 at 7:10 PM
Good points Ed. Well stated.
dedalus on June 10, 2009 at 7:10 PM
Interesting observation about it being a social substitute for the “distributed workforce”.
watson007 on June 10, 2009 at 7:11 PM
I also tend to find the chatter-accounts irritating but there’s always the scroll-on-by to deploy.
Lourdes on June 10, 2009 at 7:11 PM
I have not joined twitter yet. I only explore.
.
I will probably join someday but for now I view it like
E-mail with the function similar to CC forwarding all my friends my thoughts with the limitation of 140 characters.
Americannodash on June 10, 2009 at 7:11 PM
I joined on a lark and, to my surprise, I like it. I get access to information, links, news, etc. that I would never have time to find on my own – and that’s interesting to me (based on who I choose to follow).
http://www.twitter.com/redfoxbluestate
Check it out! ;-)
redfoxbluestate on June 10, 2009 at 7:13 PM
totally pointless chatter for the most part. Who cares if you just saw a firetruck drive by….
msh on June 10, 2009 at 7:14 PM
Darwin blames unintelligent design. God blame devolution.
MB4 on June 10, 2009 at 7:15 PM
Lord,why oh why did you intend to have me alive at this time in history. I’d of been so much happier to be dead at this date. Perhaps I could of been born 30 to 50 years earlier.
Then, as an adult, I could of driven truly great American cars. America would be the greatest nation of earth with a great economy. All would be right with the world. Women staying home taking care of their kids instead of working to pay strangers to raise them. TV shows were better, movies were better, women were sexier, and my Lord, men could be men. No stupid “sensitive” man garbage. Ahh..the good old days when a man could come home to a wife, in a dress, looking like a woman, supper ready to go, an artery clogging T-Bone with a baked potato, washed down with a beer and a Camel straight for desert.
Today were talking about… Twitter
Jeff from WI on June 10, 2009 at 7:15 PM
Mostly pointless. Same when the telegraph was invented. 99% of what we read on there has no bearing on our lives.
foucaultsvac on June 10, 2009 at 7:17 PM
I just joined yesterday to follow the irrepressible Jim Treacher. I also went ahead and started following Governor Palin. But since I just joined, it will take time for me to really get into it. I’m a Facebooker.
XWing5 on June 10, 2009 at 7:17 PM
Pointless chatter for $200.
tarpon on June 10, 2009 at 7:21 PM
The Facebook revolution totally passed me by as well. Never understood it.
myrenovations on June 10, 2009 at 7:21 PM
I don’t even understand half of the garbled crap that gets posted to Twitter.
Watcher on June 10, 2009 at 7:21 PM
I see nothing that is mutually exclusive, so I guess I’d answer that question, “Yes.”
EconomicNeocon on June 10, 2009 at 7:22 PM
Glenn Reynolds approves this blogpost.
LastRick on June 10, 2009 at 7:22 PM
Whn thy gt dwn t 24 chctrs mybe
profitsbeard on June 10, 2009 at 7:23 PM
Use TweetDeck and keep tabs on both.
LastRick on June 10, 2009 at 7:23 PM
I joined FB for the ability to reconnect w/ old HS friends, but I stayed for the fun of having a home page you share with your friends.
jgapinoy on June 10, 2009 at 7:25 PM
Pointless chatter. I’d rather have Facebook.
bryan2369 on June 10, 2009 at 7:26 PM
Chatroom 2.0
hillbillyjim on June 10, 2009 at 7:26 PM
I use Twitter to post what’s on my mind – it’s more for me than anyone else. I do like to read what other people are saying, be it politics or parenting.
Makes me wish I had more people in my real world life to talk to, though.
Anna on June 10, 2009 at 7:26 PM
The website is a passing fad and will disappear in 12-24 months.
Remember AIM?
faraway on June 10, 2009 at 7:30 PM
During my short time there, I just found the twitterers ran rampant with irrelevent nonsense. It mostly seemed popular because celebs posted their every thought and movement, and people were entralled by that.
I don’t much care what my neighbor is doing right now. Or right now. Or now. Or now, either.
I find texting on my phone to be better for the “watercooler” chatter. I can at least have something remotely approaching a conversation. Twitter is just one-way ego stroking, to let everyone know what you’re up to and what you’re thinking.
12thMonkey on June 10, 2009 at 7:31 PM
I um signed up. I have no idea why or what I signed up for. I’m going to get around to figuring it out one day. Every so often I get an email that someone added me to their list. I find that creepy. I guess they get me out of people’s email contact lists. I haven’t tweeted once. Nor have I read a tweet. I think.
petunia on June 10, 2009 at 7:33 PM
A report from Harvard Business Review revealed that most Twitter users are passive, with 10% of all users accounting for 90% of the overall number of tweets. Now, Hubspot’s report, based on some 4.5 million Twitter accounts, pretty much confirms this. Here are some of the highlights:
* 79.79% failed to provide a homepage URL
* 75.86% of users have not entered a bio in their profile
* 68.68% have not specified a location
* 55.50% are not following anyone
* 54.88% have never tweeted
* 52.71% have no followers
Read it here.
Twitter is just a 140-character limit instant messaging service between people with shared interests.
Most followers never click on a link in your Tweet.
++++++++++++
To see some eye-opening stats on your Twitter account, go to http://twitteranalyzer.com/ and plug in your Twitter name. Check out the links clicked and RTs stats. Depressing.
Checked out “EdMorrissey” at twitteranalyzer.com and only a couple people click on each of your links. The most was 14. 14 out of 2,500 followers click on your links? Hmmm…not good.
And Percent Of Messages RTed: 0%.
Most people on Twitter are just talking to themselves.
I used to be one of them, too.
albill on June 10, 2009 at 7:33 PM
When I first signed up for twitter–right after its launch–I pretty much just watched it for several months. Now I check it every day. It’s a great way to keep in touch with what people are doing, mundane or otherwise.
So I would say it’s all of the above.
Bob's Kid on June 10, 2009 at 7:35 PM
Odd, because it also says that Michelle doesn’t have any retweets, and I’ve retweeted her myself several times this week. I wouldn’t trust this analysis at all.
Ed Morrissey on June 10, 2009 at 7:37 PM
I’m still a newbie. What is this TweetDeck of which you speak?
XWing5 on June 10, 2009 at 7:39 PM
I am Switzerland on Twitter, it is not something I am interested in taking on. People have posted twits from people they are following on HA and it makes me uncomfortable and feels intrusive. I realize that it all about personal freedom. That said it might be nice to remember that if you are going to be snarky about people and those same people have access to said snarkiness, there are feelings that will be hurt. I guess to me it just seems cowardly.
Cindy Munford on June 10, 2009 at 7:39 PM
I really enjoy Twitter. Great place for me to vent about everything from Obama to the Yankees. I’ve met some good people there too. And how cool is it to be able to follow the awesome @michellemalkin?
DarkKnight3565 on June 10, 2009 at 7:42 PM
I have to admit, it made my day when, after I clicked to follow Karl Rove, a few hours later I got an email saying he was following me. It was good for a joke with my husband about being “followed” by someone so evil. :)
Anna on June 10, 2009 at 7:45 PM
Ed -
To double check how many people click on links in your Tweets, set up an account at http://www.bit.ly .
It is a URL shortening website like TinyURL.
If you set up an account you can then get statistics on how many people click on the links, RT of the link, where and when people of clicking on the links.
I have over 1,500 followers on Twitter and I usually get around 20 clicks on links. (Not good.) When the Tweets are RTed and then the click numbers averaged out, again it is about 20 clicks per link per Tweeter.
Every Tweeter that has checked out their link clicks- I recommend it regularly in my Tweetings- is shocked at how few people are actually clicking on their links.
Truth is most people have a list of 20-30 people they really follow regularly. The rest are just, as I call them, “Filler Followers”. They fill out one’s list of followers.
albill on June 10, 2009 at 7:45 PM
i dont like the layout of twitter, its confusing to see who is posting what
offroadaz on June 10, 2009 at 7:50 PM
Tweetdeck would be a dynamite app if it didn’t crash alla time.
Bob's Kid on June 10, 2009 at 7:54 PM
Pointless chatter. In other words, the new blogging and a social revolution.
LibTired (KO) on June 10, 2009 at 7:57 PM
It’s mostly crap. If you really want to get constant one liners from people you like, join up and follow them.
I use Facebook every day. I check Twitter once every couple of months and then wonder why I did.
One of these days I might find a use….so far, not much.
Asher on June 10, 2009 at 7:59 PM
“Is Twitter just a fun hangout, or do you buy the Time-cover argument that it’s changing the way we communicate and get information?”
So, let me get this straight. A guy posts this question on Twitter of other users of Twitter, whom I assume will all respond on Twitter?
So, I’m guessing that by “we,” he’s referring to some larger “we” than simply his little circle of gossipy schoolgirl note-passers?
notropis on June 10, 2009 at 7:59 PM
I joined Twitter a couple of months ago to research it as a communication tool for work and it sucked me right in! I downloaded Tweetie for the iPhone and Tweetdeck to categorize. I use Facebook to stay connected with true friends as I live so far away from them.
I use Twitter as my political playground, following bloggers and politicians. I have a few hundred FB friends but only personally know a handful of Twitter followers. I like it this way. I’m looking for an exchange of ideas and political humor and not all my friends are as politically minded (or interested) as I am.
I had withdrawal during vacation but separation is good. When I live closer to family and friends, I probably won’t use social media as much. In this mobile society, however, you can at least feel connected, even if you’re really not.
I click on most all links and try not to post many tweets without them. Most tweets I read are informative and/or opinionated. Not many people actually say what they’re doing (unlike FB, where more people seem to just be taking stupid quizzes).
ajj on June 10, 2009 at 8:04 PM
Buncha twits.
NoFanofLibs on June 10, 2009 at 8:08 PM
Fixed it for ya’ Ed.
Blake on June 10, 2009 at 8:27 PM
Twitter is not useless chatter in that people use it to waste time which it does rather effectively.
It is as useless as 90% of all cellphone conversations. And the idea that it can be used for political networking is silly since it is often down for one reason or another and especially when it is overloaded. So, come election time, it will be overloaded all the time.
Blake on June 10, 2009 at 8:30 PM
pointless chatter
corona on June 10, 2009 at 8:53 PM
The water cooler! that’s the perfect analogy! And I HAVE to admit that when I first started hearing of Twitter & “microblogging” I thought “lame!”
I tried it out bc a friend did (friend dropped off the radar – stuck w/FB – which I find to be a waste of time), and took to it like a duck to water. It’s only as good as your wisdom of follow choices. I only follow people who I will enjoy their points of view…not inane announcements of “I’m going to walk my dog now”…know your interests, pick people to follow who fit that…and viola! It is a GREAT thing for a news/punditry junkie like me! Literally news uplined in my veins! :)
Minorcan Maven on June 10, 2009 at 8:55 PM
Twitter is to Facebook like People magazine is to National Enquirer.
davidk on June 10, 2009 at 9:02 PM
I like Twitter. I work from home, and I can check it now and then to see what my favorite web sites/blogs are talking about. Only have 2 family members on, but I’m also on FaceBook with them. I follow political sites and political people, and the Barack’s Teleprompter tweets. I think I’ve tweeted maybe twice in the time I’ve been on.
I don’t know that it’s changing anything in a big way, but I enjoy it.
It sure was a kick to “follow” Karl Rove and get a message back that he wanted to “follow” me!
TeeDee on June 10, 2009 at 9:05 PM
Pointless chatter…. I will never tweet and will not by HDTV until a gun is pointed at my head….. and then, come to think of it, not even then. You want real imagery? walk outside, nimrods.
MNDavenotPC on June 10, 2009 at 9:29 PM
I love it for connecting with people with similar views. Although, it has a “preaching to the choir” element that can be frustrating. I LOVE it for breaking news and for turning me on to sources I never heard of.
I don’t like it because it is difficult to reach people with opposite views. A majority that get their info from MSM or not at all because MSM scares them too much. EVen sheeple should know the truth.
AmeriKeith on June 10, 2009 at 9:39 PM
My television died 4 months ago. I may have to take the plunge and buy a televison. They are almost all HD and there are very few tube models for sale.
Blake on June 10, 2009 at 10:02 PM
No twitter, myspace, facebook or any of that other stuff for me. I’m self-employed, work at home and just keeping up with news and a couple of political blogs is enough of a time sucking distraction from actual work. I understand the allure but I know it would kill my productivity.
Monica on June 10, 2009 at 10:12 PM
This is how I used Twitter…
As a new Twitter, I used a search command to track twits on the [AF Flt 447] disaster and I noticed a twitter’s twits that I believe to be an employee at the Rio de Janeiro/Galeão – Antônio Carlos Jobim International Airport writing a twitt saying that on the day AF Flight 447 went missing, there was a bomb threat, a terminal was closed down, traffic blocked, this airport worker was not happy, and then said they are keeping this very low key and will not discuss further.
luckybogey on June 10, 2009 at 10:12 PM
have one, still don’t get it.
yeageorge on June 10, 2009 at 10:13 PM
“Twit friends.” Heh. Indeed.
Paul_in_NJ on June 10, 2009 at 10:28 PM
Amen times ten thousand.
I’d rather have drilled to ‘duck and cover’ and put up with the hippy movement. Instead I get born in time to watch my nation get suckerpunched on 9/11, drawn into Vietnam 2 & 3, and elect a dumb@$$ Marxist snob for POTUS. And those are just the biggies.
Dark-Star on June 10, 2009 at 10:30 PM
Maybe if I get a fancier phone, I’ll twit. Until then, no.
I tend to get the freebie phones, though, so it may be awhile. *haha
AnninCA on June 10, 2009 at 10:30 PM
Pointless chatter for many.
As a now disabled and retired person who lives on the edge of wilderness five miles from the nearest town, you’d think that Twitter would be ideal for me to get that “socializing fix” that seems to be a human necessity.
Nope. I prefer chat forums that are specialized, or live e-mail chats with known friends and acquaintances. Faceless nameless people have always been the bane of Internet life, as I found out about fifteen years ago when some man “befriended” me in an old newsgroup where I used to hang out, back when I had my health and a career.
As with any man at the time attracted to me online, I insisted on slowly building friendship and rapport before any romantic consideration, and only romantic consideration after a -real life- meeting afforded the opportunity for something significant in real life to be sparked.
Turns out that “man” was a woman who also frequented that newsgroup, who thought I was too good to be true, and was determined to get an inventory of e-mails from me to prove I was nothing more than a slut hitting on the men in the group behind the scenes.
Boy, was her face ever red when her determined efforts kept coming up with boots out of my life. Eventually she fessed up and apologized.
I never again trusted seemingly innocent and sincere Internet contacts, and expanded my “real life meeting” rule to include both male and female friendships as well as potential suitors.
Twitter is just another place where things can go terribly wrong between people who have no contact other than text messages. No thanks.
KendraWilder on June 10, 2009 at 10:35 PM
Pointless chatter, emphasis on pointless!
The Twitter crowd reminds me of nothing so much as a bunch of vapid gray-haired biddies with an old-fashioned party line, with portable handsets on the user end.
Yakkety-yak yabber jabber blah blah llama rama ding dang dong all day long…accomplishing nothing useful whatsoever.
Dark-Star on June 10, 2009 at 10:42 PM
COULD BE BOTH- COULD BE NEITHER….
8-track-vinyl on June 10, 2009 at 11:35 PM
Most of those who dismiss it have never tried it.
Twitterphobia.
Ortzinator on June 10, 2009 at 11:41 PM
Twitter may just be a fad … kind of like that blogging thing, that getting our news from the computer thing or that Internets thing.
In addition to adding some “water cooler” chatter for those working at home (read: alone in our bunkers), I’ve found Twitter is in many ways replacing RSS. I find more and more that my Web reading springs from Twitter than from anywhere else.
Sure, there’s a lot of pointless chatter. But there’s a lot of pointless chatter on blogs, newscasts and in newspapers, too. The key is ignoring the noise, just as with anything else.
What’s more, it’s fun.
rockmycar on June 10, 2009 at 11:46 PM
I might get interested in Twitter once it becomes a dinosaur… That’s about the way I roll. I JUST started reading blogs, and I don’t keep up with the one I started. Never did RSS feeds. I’m just a boring old fart.
BoomJunkie on June 11, 2009 at 12:01 AM
Twitter is so 2007.
All the really with it folks are using Flutter.
Harpazo on June 11, 2009 at 12:08 AM
I started so I could follow jtlol (back when he was just little ol’ jim treacher), and lileks Also, posts about hot-dogs.
fronclynne on June 11, 2009 at 12:41 AM
Pointless chatter.
alliebobbitt on June 11, 2009 at 1:32 AM
Completely and totally useless.
I had a twitter account for about 26 hours. I couldn’t stand it and deleted it. Why do I care if you are…
busy peeling an apple
painting your toenails
trying to figure out what that lump on your anus is
or if you’re Meghan McCain, DOES HE KNOW WHO I AM?????
It’s all retarded mush. I think twitter is the result of someone that just ran out of ideas.
Spiritk9 on June 11, 2009 at 1:51 AM
10 reasons Terminators destroy ‘Twitter-brains’
Rae on June 11, 2009 at 3:57 AM
Twitter is like CBs for people who can type. It can function similarly to a blog feed, except it’s being run by actual human minds, rather than a computer just dumping information willy-nilly on you.
I’m really interested in connoisseur-level tea, and on Twitter I found I could connect up with other people with my niche interest. One can find some extremely knowledgeable writers, many of whom have very intriguing blogs of their own or are involved in the industry in some way. I’ll write– and bear with me, because the example that follows is intended to show how niche interests can find this a good tool. If you find it boring, well, that’s the point, isn’t it? I don’t expect you to be interested in tea. But people who are have found a way of connecting via Twitter.
The example: I open up my Twitter account, using Twhirl software. I find someone “retweeting,” which means republishing, a short note (or tweet) by an Indian tea marketer, who lives in Darjeeling. Darjeeling is a region whose teas intensely interest me, because they are intense, bright, ascerbic, complex, and can be mind-blowing. I then click on this Twitterer’s name to read his tweets for the past few weeks, and I decide to become a follower– a reader of his Twitter publications. He writes about how there is a drought in Darjeeling, which is causing the first-flush teas (the Spring harvest) to be very late. Links to longer comments on his blog.
I strike up a conversation with this man in Darjeeling, India about what he expects from the harvest of teas this year, and he responds back and tells me he expects the first-flush teas to come in (due to the rains that finally have appeared, hallelujah), but in very limited amounts. Buy some while it’s available! Sure enough, I see some of the best, affordable Darjeelings are out of stock already.
So my new Darjeeling friend decides to follow me, as well, to facilitate dialog. Other people who are searching for the term, “tea,” can see the back-and-forth between us and can chime in with ideas and advice. I discover new people who are tea connoisseurs, who can teach and inform me about this obsession of mine.
Eventually, several online tea merchants (including my Indian friend) send me teas, which they would like me to review on my blog. Suddenly, I am drinking absolutely fresh Darjeelings and Chinese Dragon Well teas, and on and on, that have been plucked only weeks ago, and are at their peak.
Also, there is a feedback loop with other forms of social networking and self-publishing. As I mentioned before, I can read short clips of longer blog posts and decide whether I want to follow up and read more. Also, people link to other posts of interest. In addition, Twitter can feed into Facebook. Indeed, Twitter is like the “update” on a Facebook account, but it can be read by anyone, not just your closest friends.
Indeed, as I write this, my Indian friend posted a Tweet (It’s the middle of the day in Darjeeling, though night time here), with a link talking about the brand-new, second-flush teas that are just arriving on the market in Darjeeling but aren’t available yet here in the U.S. (his blog post is, http://www.darjeelingcuppa.com/2009/06/arya-sftgfop1-second-flush-darjeeling-tea-2009/ ) Now i know that my beloved second-flush teas are going to be a bit of a challenge to get this year, as well; and I should get ready to do some early purchasing online to get what I need.
The effect of Internet networking (via Facebook, blogs, corporate and personal Web sites, Twitter, and so on) on the emerging tea culture in the United States and elsewhere is very well written up by “corax” on the Cha Dao web site: http://chadao.blogspot.com/2009/04/tea-and-internet.html
So, that’s one use for Twitter. Connecting up with others who share a niche interest (whether it be tea, technology, or politics, or a particular religious viewpoint) can be facilitated there. It doesn’t all have to be Rosie O’Donnell’s navel gazing.
slknoerr on June 11, 2009 at 4:12 AM
Plus, Lileks is on Twitter. What more do you need?
http://twitter.com/lileks
slknoerr on June 11, 2009 at 4:34 AM
Twitter is an amazing waster of time. I have seen a couple of people on Twitter that have over 25,000 messages they have written.
Figure around 30 seconds of writing per message, that is 12,500 minutes (208 hours). Using a 40-hour work week that is the equivalent of 5 weeks out of the year writing messages on Twitter. 5 weeks!
I wrote one of these 25,000-messages Tweeters and asked if he ever got any business from all his Tweeting of his business. Answer: A few leads, but he is having fun!
I wrote back and asked if he ever thought of spending 5 weeks making real sales calls on the phone and in person instead of trolling for business via Twitter.
No reply. He unfollowed me. :-)
albill on June 11, 2009 at 7:38 AM
Wow, ten paragraphs about your fascination with tea. If this “exciting” story is an example of Twitter, then may respectfully say, thank God I’m too old and not with it to spend time on something this boring. Honestly, I thought I was going to fall asleep. Sorry.
Jeff from WI on June 11, 2009 at 7:40 AM
Useful I guess from that perspective. But, have trouble seeing it as a substitute for face to face relationships where one has to learn to read facial expressions and body language et al. Still, it’s a new world and this is an experiment in it. Does anyone recall that old sci fi novelette where the folks in it no longer met face to face, just appeared to each other as a hologram because of germs or something? I can’t recall the title or author.
jeanie on June 11, 2009 at 8:17 AM
I’ve grown to hate the entity. Now, I turn on the television cable news shows and they’re telling me what they’re reading on twitter and I go to blogs who are forwarding to me what they’re reading on twitter. Good lord, I know you guys like it, but it’s almost the same thing as facebook – can you imagine going to ace of spades and him typing posts about what he’s seeing on Facebook?
Please, keep the Twitter stuff on your PC, guys (mostly you, CNN). Enough!
rjwest21 on June 11, 2009 at 8:58 AM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »