Rasmussen: Plurality wants Porkulus canceled
posted at 10:54 am on June 10, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
The American public has lost patience with the Democrats on Porkulus. According to the latest Rasmussen polling, a strong plurality of Americans want the stimulus spending canceled. A majority want the tax cuts extended:
Forty-five percent (45%) of Americans say the rest of the new government spending authorized in the $787-billion economic stimulus plan should now be canceled. A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that just 36% disagree and 20% are not sure.
According to news reports, only $36 billion of the stimulus plan had been spent as of late May.
Just 20% of adults say the tax cuts included in the stimulus plan should be canceled while 55% disagree. The stimulus plan includes $288 billion in tax cuts.
Why keep the tax cuts while dumping the spending? Tax cuts allow people to spend money themselves, instead of trusting Joe Biden to spend it for them. It also pushes capital back to the market, which creates jobs, rather than into government where it gets spent inefficiently and thus far hasn’t created anything except summer jobs and temp positions for the Census.
In the crosstabs, the demographics play out poorly for Obama, Pelosi, & Co. The 18-29 and 65-above demos are evenly split on the question, but all other age demographics favor canceling Porkulus spending. No group believes that Porkulus actually stimulated the economy or created jobs, almost four months after its passage. A majority believe that government spending is either bad for the economy or has no impact on it. Fifty-six percent of Democrats believe that Porkulus spending should continue, a pretty slim majority considering the central nature of the policy to the party, but independents favor killing it 44%-32%. Almost all income levels strongly favor cancellation, except for the under-$20K demographic, which splits on the question.
The Democrats have a great deal of political exposure on this question. Thanks to the political tone-deafness of Nancy Pelosi, Barack Obama allowed Democrats in Congress to railroad Porkulus while garnering only three Republican votes, one of whom is now a Democratic vote. Instead of allowing the GOP to participate in the bill’s creation and spreading the responsibility for its eventual failure on both parties, the Democrats own this like no other policy in Washington DC — and they’re about to reap a whirlwind as unemployment and the deficit both vault ever higher. Unless they start showing some real results — and not just the threadbare “saved or created” line the White House favors — 2010 will turn into a bloodbath for Democratic incumbents who voted for Porkulus.
Update: For some reason, WordPress ate my final draft and published an intermediate one.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
Add me to that plurality please
Zetterson on June 10, 2009 at 10:55 AM
“Add me to that plurality please”
Zetterson on June 10, 2009 at 10:55 AM
Ditto
GFW on June 10, 2009 at 10:57 AM
How’s that Hope-N-Change workin’ for ya?
itsnotaboutme on June 10, 2009 at 10:57 AM
ya think???
cmsinaz on June 10, 2009 at 10:57 AM
Me, too.
ElvenPhoenix on June 10, 2009 at 10:58 AM
Obama knew this was coming; hence, the recent push to spend the money before the country demands the “stimulus” shelved.
(“Stimulus”, you keep using that word. I do not think it means, what you think it means.)
LastRick on June 10, 2009 at 10:58 AM
Roll it all back.
AUINSC on June 10, 2009 at 10:59 AM
Ditto
journeyintothewhirlwind on June 10, 2009 at 10:59 AM
Canceling Porkulus would save or create 5 million jobs by the end of the year.
Ferris on June 10, 2009 at 10:59 AM
Yep, roll it back before it’s too late.
hollygolightly on June 10, 2009 at 10:59 AM
Burn, baby, burn! Now, when the next unemployment figures come out at over ten percent,… hell, this may even have some major ripple effect on the health care issue.
a capella on June 10, 2009 at 11:00 AM
Alternate headline:
Plurality knows more about economics than the Fresh Prince of Bill Ayers.
Daggett on June 10, 2009 at 11:00 AM
America’s chickens are comin’ home to roost!
PrincipledPilgrim on June 10, 2009 at 11:00 AM
I have to admit it’s getting better,
A little better all the time.
(chorus)
Couldn’t get much worse…
Patrick S on June 10, 2009 at 11:00 AM
Yes, please cancel the Porkulus….
I told you so……
izoneguy on June 10, 2009 at 11:00 AM
Heh
Zetterson on June 10, 2009 at 11:00 AM
We’re on the brink of disaster. Add me to the plurality.. cancel it all and extend the tax cuts. Heck, add more tax cuts!
SueM on June 10, 2009 at 11:01 AM
Voters Hope we Change back.
As Obama himself said, “you can put lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig”. A very big, expensive pig.
Steve Z on June 10, 2009 at 11:01 AM
Too late, lemmings! You wanted his hope and change. Ya got it!
SouthernGent on June 10, 2009 at 11:01 AM
Dream on Americans, dream on. Obama and his Merry Band of Miscreants could care less what we want, they have an agenda and saving America is not high on that list.
johnsteele on June 10, 2009 at 11:02 AM
This would be encouraging, except I really don’t believe that the number of people that want it repealed actually know what it is.
That said, I hope we flush it.
jdfister on June 10, 2009 at 11:02 AM
Expect to see this poll on (MS)NBC, CBS, CNN, ABC in 5…4…3…2…1
:::crickets chirping:::
VibrioCocci on June 10, 2009 at 11:02 AM
obama : canceling porkulus will cost you 700 billion dollars
runner on June 10, 2009 at 11:02 AM
After months of disastrous daily news from this amateur administration, the tide is finally starting to turn. I hope it’s not already to late to save America.
Keyser-Soze on June 10, 2009 at 11:02 AM
plu⋅ral⋅i⋅ty
/plʊˈrælɪti/ Show Spelled [ploo-ral-i-tee]
–noun.
1. Everyone who knows what the stimulus is
2. Anyone with five brain cells or more
LibTired (KO) on June 10, 2009 at 11:03 AM
I think you’re lowballing that estimate though. If porkulus was cancelled we could save or create 900 Kazillion jobs. Sure thats alot more jobs than there are people but each person would be able to work hundreds of saved jobs.
Zetterson on June 10, 2009 at 11:03 AM
45% think it should be cancelled
36% disagree
20% not sure
That equals 101%. Was ACORN involved in this?
DOOF on June 10, 2009 at 11:03 AM
Porkulus has turned out to be about as stimulating as a Mike Farrell Film Festival on PBS. Let’s make like Wal-Mart and have a Rollback!
kingsjester on June 10, 2009 at 11:04 AM
Porkulus is ok now, PAYGO is coming. Obama is looking out for us. /sarc
WashJeff on June 10, 2009 at 11:04 AM
You guys crack me up. “Yeah, some random poll of the day gives my belief system a little affirmation!” I can survive another day.
For the love of God people, do you really think Obama gives a sheet? I am now convinced that he went to office to do as much damage to the traditional American system, and that the price would be a single term.
Hell I wish our side had a politician that would do that.
ClassicCon on June 10, 2009 at 11:04 AM
Wow! That means by Washington standards, 45% of Americans are far right-wing extremists!
I can’t remember any politician saying cancel the rest of the “stimulus” spending.
WannabeAnglican on June 10, 2009 at 11:05 AM
Nearly all of my idiot liberal friends, with the exception of the outright communists, have stopped talking about Ogabe in adulatory tones. It takes a lot of restraint on my part to not ‘see I told ya so’. The teachable moments are abundant and not wasted.
daesleeper on June 10, 2009 at 11:05 AM
Buyers remorse is setting in.
chromium on June 10, 2009 at 11:05 AM
Why do people want to repeal the stimulus? Hasn’t it saved or created hundreds of thousands of jobs?
Kidding…
Shock the Monkey on June 10, 2009 at 11:06 AM
Maybe a little off-topic, but Greta on Fox last night showed a video clip of Obama now wanting a “pay-as-you-go” law, which Greta said “looked silly” after Obama rushed a $787 billion stimulus plan through Congress that hasn’t been paid for, and Obama wants a trillion-dollar health-care plan and $600 billion cap-and-trade on top of that.
Rasmussen might have found out that this looks worse than “silly” to many voters–it’s downright scary, not to mention misleading.
Steve Z on June 10, 2009 at 11:07 AM
No. Christina Romar. She is great with numbers.
WashJeff on June 10, 2009 at 11:07 AM
I wonder how the media will spin (or ignore) this poll. I wonder how 52 million “registered” voters voted this sad sack into office.
oh but he has such great pecs…..
jbh45 on June 10, 2009 at 11:08 AM
What did the country expect? Obama had NO EXPERIENCE in anything except doing as he is told. The strings on the puppet are becoming clearer every day.
volsense on June 10, 2009 at 11:09 AM
Liberal trolls say: But without this massive debt, how will government save us from ourselves?
lorien1973 on June 10, 2009 at 11:09 AM
Hey..cmsinaz Don’t use the idiomatic expression “ya”. Don’t you know that the dems and some of the republicans might label you a hayseed, middle america loser. Ya is now second only to You Betcha as the most unacceptable term in the English language.
Dan Pet on June 10, 2009 at 11:10 AM
I’d much rather have The Precedency cancelled.
progressoverpeace on June 10, 2009 at 11:11 AM
Obama’s pig has swine flu!
We have to put major pressure on Congress to stop this!
Rush said yesterday he smells panic!
freeus on June 10, 2009 at 11:11 AM
New GM Chairman: Car? WTF is that? LOL!
lorien1973 on June 10, 2009 at 11:11 AM
Could it be that the public is finally recognizing the true agenda of this Marxist regime and its left wing bosses? Let’s hope so.
rplat on June 10, 2009 at 11:11 AM
You may be right but the little warrior’s Achilles’ Heel is a negative poll and falling approval ratings. He went to Washington with a big plan but a bigger ego. He will do whatever is necessary for a second term which may mean throwing the great unwashed a bone or two. We may not see it immediately but he has Axelrod and Rahm working on the dirty details.
sherry on June 10, 2009 at 11:12 AM
36% are Marxist fools, that’s too many, so most of them must just be ignorant fools.
kirkill on June 10, 2009 at 11:14 AM
It is properly pronounced “stick-it-to-us”
oldernwiser on June 10, 2009 at 11:14 AM
1121 cities are currently registered for the TEA party July 4th protest. I wonder how the media will spin the +2 million expected turnout. We all can’t be bible-thumping, gun toting, right-wing extremists. Many are dis-illusioned dems as well.
DC won’t get it until November 2010 when we THE VOTERS elect several freshman senators and congressmen to replace the old farts that have managed or at least attempted to destroy nearly every segment of our GREAT society.
jbh45 on June 10, 2009 at 11:14 AM
Yeah, that includes dead people.
Daggett on June 10, 2009 at 11:15 AM
Hey Dan Pet
LOL :-)
damn proud
cmsinaz on June 10, 2009 at 11:15 AM
It’s amazing that the polls are turning against The One, considering the cornucopia of apologists aligned with him, from teachers, to labor unions, to media outlets. Persistent failure is persuasive for all but the most hard core bots. I expect this trend to continue.
WordsMatter on June 10, 2009 at 11:16 AM
The likelihood that zerobama or Pelosi or whoever will cancel the rest of porkulus is slim to none.
What will happen to the rest of that money is going to be a huge game of hide the weenie. All of it will end up getting sucked up by grafty constituents, donors, and used to pay off favors. I’m surprised Murtha hasn’t stolen most of it already.
If they were to cancel it they’d have to spend a few minutes pretending to account for it. That’s not going to happen, but it a wonderful 2010 campaign issue. Hell, we may be able to watch the newsclips of half of congress and the senate getting booked by 2010 for stealing the cash.
Spiritk9 on June 10, 2009 at 11:16 AM
What that?… Do you hear it?…
…I think the country is finally waking up!
Daddy-O on June 10, 2009 at 11:17 AM
Photoshop alert.
Obama and his minions tilting against windmills.
Speakup on June 10, 2009 at 11:17 AM
Pork must be cooked thoroughly. Don’t bitch now that you Hope & Changers got Brain worms from the raw porkulus…
portlandon on June 10, 2009 at 11:17 AM
This is kind of good news, but I can’t for the life of me figure out why that # is not in the 80 percentile range. What’s wrong with people? I’m no economist but good grief, this stupid plan never did make sense. The best thing to come out of porkulus is that maybe, just MAYBE, we’ll finally be rid of Pelosi/Reid & Company.
STOP. SPENDING. NOW.
scalleywag on June 10, 2009 at 11:18 AM
{in front of the curtain}…When we get in office…well, there will be challenges. And it will look like we’re doing the wrong thing but you have to just trust us. Ya see? Just trust us.
{behind the curtain}…I cannot believe they fell for that. What rubes!!
Thunderstorm129 on June 10, 2009 at 11:18 AM
Par for the course.
javamartini on June 10, 2009 at 11:18 AM
Plurality? But Obama won!
gwelf on June 10, 2009 at 11:19 AM
Obama is looking more and more like a one term President. I’m not sure whether to hope for more disaster to seal his fate or not.
First things first, vote them bums who voted for this “stimulus” out of Congress.
I hope you’re right Ed, I hope it will be a Dem bloodbath in 2010. It’s certainly looks like that’s the way the ball is rolling now.
Geronimo on June 10, 2009 at 11:19 AM
Why is god angry?
And what does god need with a starship?
lorien1973 on June 10, 2009 at 11:20 AM
Stimulus isn’t working. Stimulus is not ever going to work (for the economy, but it works well for Dem special interests). Stimulus needs to be rolled back.
2010 should require a promise from anyone seeking office that they will vote to roll it back.
myrenovations on June 10, 2009 at 11:20 AM
Not just that, but if they cancelled it, they’d have to explain how they rammed it through without letting anyone even examine it. And the slobbering press will also have to explain how they fully participated in this frontal attack on America.
progressoverpeace on June 10, 2009 at 11:21 AM
Just another sign that the “Obama popularity bubble” is about to burst and plunge him into the exact opposite of the worship he’s getting currently.
And when that happens… Like all tyrants, especially petulant ones like Obama… get really mean, ugly and nasty.
And that’s when the GOP needs to push back.
wildcat84 on June 10, 2009 at 11:21 AM
Won’t happen. face the reality that both democrats and republicans want to rule your life. Their reasons differ; that is all.
lorien1973 on June 10, 2009 at 11:21 AM
Yet another sign the age of Obama is beginning to wane?
Advocate For Change on June 10, 2009 at 11:22 AM
Rescinding the porkulus should be the mantra of the next wave of tea parties.
promachus on June 10, 2009 at 11:22 AM
lorien1973 on June 10, 2009 at 11:20 AM
Please, lorien, don’t make starfleet_dude reappear from whatever galaxy he transported to. Heh.
kingsjester on June 10, 2009 at 11:23 AM
Shudder…. I’m half afraid that Biden is going to buy some magic beans or something. Or maybe the TV that Jesus Himself watched whilst in Capernaum…..
mjk on June 10, 2009 at 11:23 AM
Well honestly, compared to how these numbers were oriented just a few months ago, this is pretty significant “change.” Most people polled do not follow the news as closely as, I assume, you do. I’d be willing to bet that most people paid little to no attention to economic data until the latest unemployment news was released this week. All they did was see that number and and that was all the info they needed to understand this was not working. Give it a few more months and watch the numbers shift even further in our direction.
Zetterson on June 10, 2009 at 11:23 AM
The European tree fell to the right and pointed directly at the White House. How appropriate.
LibTired (KO) on June 10, 2009 at 11:23 AM
We’re getting very close to the point where that won’t matter anymore, at least with the populace. If Obama behaves arrogantly and petulantly past that point, you are going to see 65% disapproval in polls.
This is the make or break time for Obama, whether he will be able to somehow generate more smoke for his mirrors, or will he follow in Jimmy Carter’s path and be dispatched via landslide in 2010 and 2012?
wildcat84 on June 10, 2009 at 11:24 AM
Secretary Giethner: See to it that some money makes its way to the 20% who are unsure.
Sincerely,
Spender in Chief
DOOF on June 10, 2009 at 11:24 AM
Ugh, between this guy and the 31 year old mail clerk, GM/chrysler/etc will be in tip top shape come next year!!! Actually they’ll probably be out of business…
mjk on June 10, 2009 at 11:25 AM
whew! finally registered today after a long long wait. hello everyone, i will try not to be a troll (whatever that is LOL)
porkulus is the liberal’s best friend. keep our country poor and in debt, therefore the “little people” will be so very thankful for the largess from the “ONE”. that’s all this administration is after, all of US in debt to the “ONE”.
dprin339 on June 10, 2009 at 11:26 AM
It’s going to be a long 3.5 years no matter how you cut it, but that time’s going to seem like an eternity to Obama once everyone stops kissing his @$$.
He’s incredibly thin-skinned, so he’s going to completely crack when the heat is turned up over his failed policies and he’s getting hit hard by all sides. At that point, he’ll be Charlie Brown from the old song whining “Why’s everybody always picking on me?!?”
teke184 on June 10, 2009 at 11:27 AM
This man knows about the polls b/cause the dems live and die by them but instead of listening to us he instead does the assinine like saying yesterday we have to hurry up and increase the taxes! I don’t think he has a clue,somebody is pulling his strings.
ohiobabe on June 10, 2009 at 11:27 AM
Face it, the Democrats are so out of touch with the real world that they will most likely take all this anger against Porkulus as just another example of racism against a black President and just pish-posh all the criticism….until next year, when the majority of them are soundly trounced out of office and the balance of power in Congress shifts dramatically.
At which point, B.O. will once again become nothing less than an empty suit with less than two years in office.
pilamaye on June 10, 2009 at 11:27 AM
Porkulus was never meant as Keynesian stimulus, even leftists know the theory is a joke.
Porkulus is a slush fund for the Democrat elections in 2010 and 2012.
We need a congress that knows the government accounting equivalent of disarming a ticking bomb. If we don’t repeal this fat pig, the conservative party is dead for a generation or more.
Who will be Senator Jack Bauer?
jeff_from_mpls on June 10, 2009 at 11:29 AM
But if they cancel it, who’ll pay my mortgage?
Jeff, all we need is a Congress that defends the Constitution.
Steven on June 10, 2009 at 11:31 AM
Another addition to the plurality here. How come I never get polled for these things?
jeanie on June 10, 2009 at 11:31 AM
It’s the possibility of seeing this that gets me up in the morning.
tru2tx on June 10, 2009 at 11:32 AM
This is what happens when you shove crap down peoples throats. It may have tasted good to some going down,but not so good when it comes back up. It was crap when it passed and its worse than crap now. Choke on that regurgitation Dems. 2010 cant come fast enough.
canditaylor68 on June 10, 2009 at 11:33 AM
Ed, can you explain WHY in Gods name do Americans have to lose patience about something that was evident to a child with a 7th grade education?
csdeven on June 10, 2009 at 11:33 AM
Yes, and it must be cancelled quickly. As quickly as it was passed.
Brat on June 10, 2009 at 11:33 AM
There really is no point in this but i hope these kinds of polls keep coming.
Obama and his genius cohorts are acting not in our interest but in their own. People are only just beginning to get it.
ORconservative on June 10, 2009 at 11:33 AM
I’ll take Jack or Tony any day of the week:) Jon Voight would not be bad either!
ohiobabe on June 10, 2009 at 11:33 AM
Because these “tax cuts” aren’t really tax cuts? Unlike the Bush tax credits, much of it was wealth-redistributionist welfare payments to people who don’t pay taxes. And much of it will be taxable income – for instance for people who have more than one job and have had taxes withheld by both employers.
Keep the Bush tax cuts, expand on them with deep corporate tax cuts, and ditch Barry’s faux tax cuts.
Buy Danish on June 10, 2009 at 11:34 AM
Heh. I think Rahm and Axelrod snuck out and felled that tree. Why? Photo op for 0bama family to plant a new one.
Distract! Distract! Distract!
Brat on June 10, 2009 at 11:38 AM
Of course tax cuts work. That’s why the Dems hate them. The Dems continue to believe that Joe Biden is brighter than the average citizen. I happen to agree with them to some extent, since it was average citizen that elected the most corrupt and inept government in US history. You get what you elect.
Suffer, because they are not listening and will probably get elected for another term.
Hening on June 10, 2009 at 11:40 AM
Lest anyone doubt my assertions:
WASHINGTON (AP) — Millions of Americans enjoying their small windfall from President Barack Obama’s “Making Work Pay” tax credit are in for an unpleasant surprise next spring…But new tax withholding tables issued by the IRS could cause millions of taxpayers to get hundreds of dollars more than they are entitled to under the credit, money that will have to be repaid at tax time.
At-risk taxpayers include a broad swath of the public: married couples in which both spouses work; workers with more than one job; retirees who have federal income taxes withheld from their pension payments and Social Security recipients with jobs that provide taxable income…
Read the whole thing to see how many suckas this faux “tax cut” affects.
Buy Danish on June 10, 2009 at 11:43 AM
You know, I think you’re absolutely right. I read way too much news so sometimes I’m amazed that people aren’t stomping their feet about this administration. It’s because they aren’t paying any attention to it. sad.
welcome dprin339 on June 10, 2009 at 11:26 AM
A troll is someone who belongs at the Huffington Post but comes here instead with the sole purpose of antagonizing and taunting HA commentors. Accurate enough? I encourage people to ignore them until they get tired of nobody listening and go back under their rock.
scalleywag on June 10, 2009 at 11:43 AM
Honeymoon over?
Hell, it’s looking like a divorce.
Yakko77 on June 10, 2009 at 11:46 AM
The Issue is the fact that No One knew what Obama was all about during the campaign. We are finding out now. All we have to rely on is his sense of urgency in pushing his agenda, his rush to get bad spending bills through Congress and his ability to be disingenuous about borrowing and spending.
I want to see :
* Complete files and schedules of his years as an Illinois state senator from 1997 to 2004
* Obama’s client list from during his time in private practice with the Chicago law firm of Davis, Miner, Barnhill and Gallard
* Illinois State Bar Association records
* Baptism records
* Obama/Dunham marriage license
* Obama/Dunham divorce documents
* Soetoro/Dunham marriage license
* Adoption records
All of which are guarded as State Secrets. Transparency my @ss.
old trooper2 on June 10, 2009 at 11:46 AM
How come I have a sneaking suspicion that the MSM will never allow the number to be 10% or over? I think we’ll see it reported as 9.9% for several years in a row no matter how high it really is.
DrAllecon on June 10, 2009 at 11:46 AM
My former boss — an otherwise VERY intelligent man (who happens to be Jewish) voted for Obama. He campaigned diligently, spending many of his weekends going door to door. Two days after the election, he and I spent the day traveling to another city and I gently began to quiz him on his knowledge of his candidate’s stated positions and comments. Frankly, I was shocked when, after all the time he spent devoted to Obama’s election, he seemed not to know about some of the comments made by Obama — including his stance on late term abortion and other high profile and scary stuff. We no longer work together, but I want to ask him — how’s that HopeNChange working out?
lovedinthekeys on June 10, 2009 at 11:48 AM
DrAllecon on June 10, 2009 at 11:46 AM
And if they do, it will be labeled a problem that OBama inherited and caused by Bush’s failed policies.
scalleywag on June 10, 2009 at 11:49 AM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »