Letterman: When I joked about Palin’s daughter having sex, I meant Bristol, not Willow
posted at 8:41 pm on June 10, 2009 by Allahpundit
A sneak preview of tonight’s monologue from EW. He wasn’t joking about her 14-year-old daughter being a prostitute, silly. He was joking about her 18-year-old daughter being a prostitute. Perfectly legal. Whew!
“We were, as we often do, making jokes about people in the news and we made some jokes about Sarah Palin and her daughter [Bristol]… and now they’re upset with me…” Letterman says on tonight’s show. “These are not jokes made about her 14-year-old daughter. I would never, never make jokes about raping or having sex of any description with a 14-year-old girl…. Am I guilty of poor taste? Yes. Did I suggest that it was okay for her 14-year-old daughter to be having promiscuous sex? No.” Saying he hopes he’s “cleared part of this up,” Letterman extended an invitation to Palin to come on the show as a guest.
Don’t you see? He’d never condone statutorily raping a girl who’s underage. All he meant to do was goof on the idea that Palin’s eldest daughter, a single mother with a baby, is a whore. Everything cool now? Let’s move on.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 … 5 6 7 8 9 … 11 Next »
I still like Leno the best, I am sure he’s a lefty to but he at least seems aware that half the country has a different view.
Cindy Munford on June 11, 2009 at 12:14 AM
So that must mean the Obamas are not people in the news. What a pathetically lame excuse.
Letterman has no morals. The Left as a whole has very little in the way of morals. That’s precisely why those, like Sarah Palin, who try to live moral lives are so threatening and, more importantly, why people like the morally-defective Mr. Letterman have a vested interest in ripping those people to shreds.
PoodleSkirt on June 11, 2009 at 12:14 AM
SouthernGal is a new addition to my “do not reply” list.
Cindy Munford on June 11, 2009 at 12:15 AM
Letterman should be fired.
The Final Cut on June 11, 2009 at 12:16 AM
The left has adapted an ends justifies the means ideology, as long as they win, whatever they do to get there is totally acceptable.
In response to this many on the right are adopting a scorched earth policy. Consequently it is getting ugly and going to get a whole lot more ugly as the left gets more desperate.
doriangrey on June 11, 2009 at 12:18 AM
As a person who grew up in VA I can tell you it is most definitely the south. It was the CAPITAL of the south. Robert E Lee is everywhere. Civil War monuments ant parks are all over. They are south and proud. I’m not saying that is a good thing, but it’s the way it is.
Ampersand on June 11, 2009 at 12:19 AM
Everyone should be proud of where they are from. It’s home.
Cindy Munford on June 11, 2009 at 12:21 AM
There is an interesting thing going on with former Hillary supporters, and their disconnect with the ‘bambi party (yes, there is a difference between them and the Democrat Party). The PUMA’s are avid supporters of Sarah Palin. They are outraged over this with Letterman. Their comments match 1-1 exactly what is being said here tonight – all but for those by Obama’s cheerleaders. Seems SouthernGal and a couple of others are really out of the loop. There is a liberal movement out there that is starting to sound like the old blue dog Democrat Party. Actually, many are starting to sound just like conservatives.
Girlfriends, it’s time to move on and do some study on exactly how/why Hillary lost to ‘bambi. They are rabid vocalists against Letterman and the sickness that has invaded our country. Even more rabid against Obama’s hijacking of the party.
24K lady on June 11, 2009 at 12:25 AM
Screw you and the prius you rode in on Dave.
Hope you don’t have to clarify the jokes you tell about our coke head President Obama and his pervert inlaws or Biden and his coke head daughter.
OHH…that’s right.
Dave has his lips pressed so hard to Obama’s butt he can’t find anything to skewer him and his administration for.
Baxter Greene on June 11, 2009 at 12:28 AM
I agree! I’m from Richmond VA. It’s a great place, although I’m glad to have moved away to see something different. I just mean I’m not totally into the south as a lot of Virginians are. I do pride myself on having good southern manners though. I’m always surprised how many people are shocked to hear someone say “yes ma’am” when you aren’t in the south. But you’d never ever catch me wearing anything with a confederate flag on it…
Ampersand on June 11, 2009 at 12:32 AM
Letterman seems to have come unhinged about the same time as he caught harry wearing the old lady’s underpants.
StimulateTHIS on June 11, 2009 at 12:33 AM
Real Clear Politics has a clip up of what that jackass said tonight – he’s trying to make it sound like the jokes were about Bristol notwithstanding the fact that she was never in NY!
I’m one of the many who called CBS, wrote to them and all of their sponsors and I pray to God that that letcher is fired. There is no way a reasonable person could mistake Willow for Bristol, he knew damn well who he was talking about.
theenforser on June 11, 2009 at 12:33 AM
I am an old lady who grew up watching the true comics, Lucille Ball, Sid Caesar and Imogene Coco, Carol Burnett, and others of their generation who were very capable of making us laugh without the vile mean spirited attacks that pass as “comedy” today. I could still watch Bill Cosby forever, the rest of the so-called “comics” who seem to thrive on the meanness, not at all.
And the children of politicians should definitely be off limits. I defended Chelsea Clinton when many on both the right and the left attacked her during the primaries, as I heard her speak at Penn, and she represented her mother’s views in a gracious, intelligent discourse with students, all by herself. A brave, intelligent, poised, well-spoken young lady whom I would be proud to call my daughter. The fact that she is the daughter of a Democrat in no way diminishes her confidence, poise and intelligence. Attacks on her, and other children of politicians, simply because of their parentage, truly diminish only those who choose to do the attacking.
oldoldbabs on June 11, 2009 at 12:43 AM
Eff this filthy piece of garbage.
Jaibones on June 11, 2009 at 12:43 AM
Agreed. Even though there are people who truly do not equate it with slavery, it’s just more trouble then it’s worth. So many other things of historical value that can just as easily be displayed or worn. I was in Williamsburg a couple of weeks ago (live in Florida now) and saw some beautiful prints of there and Glouester.
Cindy Munford on June 11, 2009 at 12:45 AM
I don’t think it makes any difference which child it was. What kind of person goes after young people?
Cindy Munford on June 11, 2009 at 12:47 AM
“OH Sarah, no, no, I was kidding about your ‘older’ daughter being a slut. Now please come on my show.”
Hey Dave, did you ever call Drew Barrymore a slut for pulling up her shirt on your show? You could call any of your Hollywood Starlet guests that come on your show sluts for thier behavior.
hawkdriver on June 11, 2009 at 12:47 AM
their…
hawkdriver on June 11, 2009 at 12:48 AM
Oh Sweet Mother of Jerome Philby. Jaibones said the Eff word. What’s this world coming to?
Effing effers.
hillbillyjim on June 11, 2009 at 12:50 AM
This has nothing to do with someone being a southern belle.
TTheoLogan on June 11, 2009 at 12:50 AM
Great point, Hawk. And great to hear from you.
I hope all is well. All of the good numbers to you, sir.
hillbillyjim on June 11, 2009 at 12:52 AM
Is Letterman even relevant anymore?
Babyhugger on June 11, 2009 at 12:52 AM
Well, now that I’ve thought it over… Letterman probably just didn’t have time to read the first joke after his weekly father-son NAMBLA retreat.
As far as the “prostitute” joke goes… obviously, he thinks any woman who has a baby out of wedlock is as much a whore as his own wife is. he’s just trying toapply his own experience to the real world.
If anybody finds these jokes offensive, I’ll consider making a non-apologetic excuse in a couple of days.
malclave on June 11, 2009 at 12:52 AM
Very true, but at least if it was the older, it wouldn’t be condoning an illegal act against a minor. I agree that any attacks on children of politicians are offensive and inappropriate. Letterthug is a letcherous, mysogonist pig. This is a man who lived w/ a woman out of wedlock, impregnated her and married her 5 years later. That tells us alot about what he thinks of women and his kid, doesn’t it?
theenforser on June 11, 2009 at 12:54 AM
Sarah Palin should go on Letterman’s show. That would be interesting.
Moesart on June 10, 2009 at 10:41 PM
Well, we all know that ain’t gonna happen unless Dave goes over to fox and lets murdoch pull his strings.
benny shakar on June 11, 2009 at 12:54 AM
Look, I didn’t say it, it’s boring.
Cindy Munford on June 11, 2009 at 12:55 AM
Letterman’s son should be very proud of his old man.
omnipotent on June 11, 2009 at 12:55 AM
I count no less than 5 times on page 5 that SouthernGal called Bristol a slut or slutty. It probably thought it was clever for working it in so many ways.
Surely so much work at lowering the level of discourse and name-calling deserves a hearty ban-hammer?
ThereGoesTheNeighborhood on June 11, 2009 at 12:56 AM
What’s going on with you? Are there lots of new folks in your area?
Cindy Munford on June 11, 2009 at 12:56 AM
Ok, TT. I’ll bite. What, in your opinion, constitutes a genuine, honest to Gawd, Southern Belle?
One whose aristocratic blue-blood parents have the proper lineage? One who has gone through the rarified “cotillion” process of “proper introduction to genteel society?”
Do tell, since you can’t seem to leave it alone. Educate us poor serfs, Missa Logan.
hillbillyjim on June 11, 2009 at 12:56 AM
I think only her issuing a threat of bodily harm will get rid of her. Especially since she’s new.
Cindy Munford on June 11, 2009 at 12:57 AM
My god man. I didn’t say it did. Does posting incessantly about things that you don’t consider relevant to southern belles make you a southern belle?
Ampersand on June 11, 2009 at 12:58 AM
Yeah, it’s getting pretty crowded here.
hawkdriver on June 11, 2009 at 12:59 AM
I called CBS from work today, got the switchboard, told the woman I wanted to comment on Letterman, but she said the line was closed until 2 o’clock and gave me the direct number to call at that time. She sounded a little harried, so I made a comment that it sounded like they might be getting a lot of calls, and her reply was “You betcha”!
oldoldbabs on June 11, 2009 at 12:59 AM
OK folks, help me out here. Someone was on the cover of Newsweek recently and you people had an absolute fit because they hadn’t airbrushed her moustache.
I don’t think it was the First Lady… can anybody remember who it was?
Thanks in advance.
benny shakar on June 11, 2009 at 1:03 AM
Don’t remember anything like that… Obama’s grandmother, maybe? Hillary Clinton?
malclave on June 11, 2009 at 1:05 AM
Do you have everything you need? Can’t wait to have a thread with all those funny “I am so short…….” sayings.
Cindy Munford on June 11, 2009 at 1:07 AM
He could just untie them from Soros? No?
ClassicCon on June 11, 2009 at 1:08 AM
Good to see you living down to expectations, Beanie. So are you defending Letterman, or just changing the subject? Keep digging.
Jaibones on June 11, 2009 at 1:09 AM
You cannot be outraged at the treatment of the Palin family and then in the same thread be mean spirited and attack Sasha and Malia, and even MO, period. That’s what the Democrats do, and we rightfully call them hypocrites. Let’s be different, please, let’s be different.
oldoldbabs on June 11, 2009 at 1:13 AM
Since you’ve been posting, I haven’t been giving you shout outs. And I don’t want to interrupt your conversations with others. But I do remember you and your company every day in my prayers. So, please do take care.
Loxodonta on June 11, 2009 at 1:14 AM
Hey Hawk! You and yours over there are in our prayers! Take care and be safe, Hero!
HornetSting on June 11, 2009 at 1:16 AM
So that means you were pure as the driven snow when you got married?
So that means any woman who has sex and not married is a slut?
Interesting, are you sure your mom isn’t in that category? Very high standards….ummmmm, now about your husband or boyfriend, when was it that he first had sex? It had to be you on the wedding night…or was it?
right2bright on June 11, 2009 at 1:18 AM
It was Rosie…your dream girl…
right2bright on June 11, 2009 at 1:20 AM
Someone needs to get on the someecard for “Sorry about that tasteless joke about raping your child. What are you doing on Friday night?”
alliebobbitt on June 11, 2009 at 1:20 AM
This reminds me of H.L. Mencken’s definition of misogyny, or when men hate women as much as women hate each other. Any guess as to how many teeth Southern Gal has?
alliebobbitt on June 11, 2009 at 1:24 AM
I don’t think I can remember ever even looking at Newsweek on a magazine rack. It bores me that much.
alliebobbitt on June 11, 2009 at 1:26 AM
The same as southerngal’s number of braincells: One and a half.
HornetSting on June 11, 2009 at 1:27 AM
Forgot to tell you that I am glad you got some new medication and that you are feeling better. Now seriously I am going to bed.
Cindy Munford on June 11, 2009 at 1:29 AM
Thanks Cindy. I feel about a hundred times better, but I think the infection is fighting a good fight.
Now, go to bed sleepy head.
HornetSting on June 11, 2009 at 1:30 AM
Ohhh. Now I get it!
Joke Fail.
brennan251 on June 11, 2009 at 1:32 AM
I don’t care what he says, his show isn’t worth watching and he isn’t worth paying any attention to.
Spiritk9 on June 11, 2009 at 1:33 AM
The bottom line is – if someone you don’t know or even do know said something like that about your daughter, how would you feel?
Travis1 on June 11, 2009 at 1:36 AM
No idea what Mr. Limbaugh said about Chelsea. Referring to a young child as a “house pet” is a reflection on the parents, and how they treat their child, not on the child him/herself; using the metaphor as attacks/indicts the parents only. Implying a 13- or 14-year-old is sexually promiscuous, or receptive to sexual advances, is [also] an attack on the child.
I don’t see you losing any sleep over the difference between the two. Or am I wrong?
RD on June 11, 2009 at 1:40 AM
I’m guessing the answer requires a decimal point.
Ronnie on June 11, 2009 at 1:41 AM
Meh. He’s making a joke his audience will enjoy. What’s the problem? It really says more about him and his audience than about the Palins.
Let the cretins be cretins. It’s that what freedom is all about?
Aquateen Hungerforce on June 11, 2009 at 1:43 AM
I wonder if SouthernGal refers to her friends and family members who have sex outside of marriage as sluts as well.
Remember what is good for the goose is good for the gander.
And if you try to deny that none of your friends have or are currently having sex outside of marriage then you should appear on Letterman yourself so America can have a guffaw.
technopeasant on June 11, 2009 at 1:43 AM
Chelsea was never what you’d call beautiful. She’s grown into herself, but when she went through her ugly duckling phase, it sure was ugly.
alliebobbitt on June 11, 2009 at 1:46 AM
Ahem. He was referring to Willow — by default — since she was the only daughter at the game. The fact that he didn’t *know* he was referring to her can be debated or discussed. What can’t be rewritten was the fact that, whether he knew it or not, he was referring to her.
Whether or not Letterman knew is an interesting question, but the ‘act’ of not realizing you’re referring to someone is not the same as “not referring to” them. Learn the difference, please, *before* you try to formulate some sort of point about the issue.
RD on June 11, 2009 at 1:47 AM
Seriously, I get pretty sick of the sanctimony of some righties.
Being right-wing to me means loving freedom. Loving freedom to me means letting other people be free. Be free to do as they wish, say what they want, and make themselves what they want to be (of course, as long as what they do doesn’t infornge on the liberties of others). If they happen to make themselves into a cretin, so be it.
Know that Letterman is scum. Don’t watch him. If it pleases you, don’t patronize the companies that advertise on his show. But don’t call for him to be fired. Don’t pretend that this is the end of the world. Don’t try to make him, through any sort of collective action, be what he is not.
Aquateen Hungerforce on June 11, 2009 at 1:47 AM
I don’t think the cretins should be freely encouraged to rape children. It’s all fun and games…
alliebobbitt on June 11, 2009 at 1:48 AM
The media knows no limit in the tools they use to present Conservatives in the worst possible light. They use aspect ratio in photo-setting to make Katie Couric look slender and the same to make Ann Coulter look like a cartoon character. The cover with Palin was just another cheap shot used to cut her down a notch. It’s all the “intelligent” libs are blogging about around the web.
I can’t wait to kick you people after you’re the ones who are down. And make no mistake, it’s coming. It’s happening already.
No quarter.
hawkdriver on June 11, 2009 at 1:49 AM
Re-reading that, does it really make sense to you?
I love Rush as much as the next right-wing extremist, but making fun of little girls is always in bad taste. Defend it at your peril.
Aquateen Hungerforce on June 11, 2009 at 1:49 AM
Why not call for him to be fired? It’s a free country. Who’s to say he’s not a pedophile when he makes icky jokes about it?
alliebobbitt on June 11, 2009 at 1:50 AM
Wow. Take a step back. Letterman is many bad things, but an encourager of child-rape is simply not one of them.
Aquateen Hungerforce on June 11, 2009 at 1:50 AM
Hello N.O.W…..hello….hmmmmm….silence…go figure…
It’s time to bury CBS with phone calls…and his biggest advertiser…call them…
He needs to be fired…period…the moron…
areseaoh on June 11, 2009 at 1:53 AM
Well, then you’ve picked an awfully peculiar place to spend some of your free time.
RD on June 11, 2009 at 1:53 AM
I think I’m good now that I have some magazines for my ammo, Cindy. (Hope and Change) ;-)
hawkdriver on June 11, 2009 at 1:53 AM
Yes.
RD on June 11, 2009 at 1:54 AM
It depends. Chelsea Clinton was an ugly little girl. Not that bad taste, but her parents didn’t have to worry about anyone wanting to have sex with her. Imus and the basketball team, now that was offensive, and he deserved to be fired. Same for Letterman; jokes about raping children is just not cool.
alliebobbitt on June 11, 2009 at 1:54 AM
Sure he did. Even if the NYT scrubbed the transcript, he said it on national TV.
alliebobbitt on June 11, 2009 at 1:56 AM
If it is truly a free country, then he should be able to hold his job as long as people will pay to watch him, no matter what he does (again, caveat that it doesn’t infringe on the liberties of others).
By all means, if you want him to be fired, don’t watch his show or patronize his advertisers. Ask your friends and family not to as well. But don’t demand that he be fired when others want to watch him. Just avoid him yourself, and know what type of people like his show. Easy-peasy.
Aquateen Hungerforce on June 11, 2009 at 1:57 AM
That whole freedom thing always seems to end right around the time conservatives start using it.
Ronnie on June 11, 2009 at 1:57 AM
FIFY
Ronnie on June 11, 2009 at 2:00 AM
Not so much. I like a lot of the commenters here.
Look, I don’t think either reference is acceptable, be it Bristol or Willow, but if he honestly believed he was referencing Bristol, why would it be a fact that he was referencing Willow? I’m not defending him, I just thought that was an extremely weird thing to say.
And are you in the habit of telling ugly little girls they are ugly?
He said he supported child rape? I find that incredibly hard to believe.
Aquateen Hungerforce on June 11, 2009 at 2:02 AM
Sure. Glad you could set us all straight, sport.
RD on June 11, 2009 at 2:03 AM
So if you made an off color joke at the workplace, I’m sure you’d be happy to have the PC police call for you to be fired, right?
No one is stopping you from calling for his firing. I’d just point out that your calling for him to be fired because he said something you don’t like is a very un-freedom loving thing to do.
Flip the script. Would you back a leftist call for Rush to be fired for some of the more off-color things he has said?
Aquateen Hungerforce on June 11, 2009 at 2:05 AM
Aquateen Hungerforce on June 11, 2009 at 1:47 AM
If you genuinely “love freedom” then you should have no problem with any of those here expressing their dissatisfaction with Letterman to his network, his show’s sponsors, to whomever.
What you interpret as “making fun” may constitute something besides your idea of “fun” to targets such as Bristol or Willow. Broadcasting is a licensed privilege; not a right. Those who cross the line are subject to losing that privilege. Those who use that venue to slander children should expect and endure redress. Letterman has crossed that line.
viking01 on June 11, 2009 at 2:06 AM
Why is it that I always get called on my happy fingers? Yes, I make typos. Is that a problem? Is that the worst thing wrong with my posts? OK then!
Aquateen Hungerforce on June 11, 2009 at 2:08 AM
-
And she should go… Walk on, slap him face, call him a pig, tell him Tod is out back if he wants to continue the interview… and then walk off.
-
RalphyBoy on June 11, 2009 at 2:08 AM
No, if it is a truly free country, then the network will fire him if enough people can convince them he deserves it.
Are you in the habit of telling little girls they should be raped and that it would be funny?
You could have fooled me.
Making light of it is tacit endorsement.
alliebobbitt on June 11, 2009 at 2:12 AM
This was not a workplace joke. That premise is faulty.
Letterman got too cute for his doltish self on broadcast television using public property airwaves to disparage a citizen below the age of majority. To hint at a manner of her molestation. Personal freedom ends where the rights of another begins. That is unless you subscribe a the defective logic one standard of freedom for Letterman but a lesser one for Willow Palin. Freedom has costs. One of those costs is responsibility.
viking01 on June 11, 2009 at 2:13 AM
I would think that any rational person would expect to have the disciplinary ball rolling if they joked about the boss’s daughter getting raped, yes.
Telling people not to call for his firing seems un-freedom-loving to me. Protest is unpatriotic?
They do, and I really don’t care, but then I’m a freedom-loving person.
Ronnie on June 11, 2009 at 2:13 AM
I’m a believer that as soon as comedy is constrained by what’s offensive it’ll cease to be funny. My problem with Letterman is that he isn’t funny and he’s about as far from clever as humanly possible. I’m not offended that he called Sarah Palin a slut or Bristol Palin a whore, I’m offended that he thinks that that’s funny. Where’s the reveal? What the hell is supposed to be clever about that? It’s like he hired Carlos Mencia and Seth Meyers as his writers.
galenrox on June 11, 2009 at 2:14 AM
I think taking Letterman down would be quite a coup for the right, and there should be a serious movement. It’s time to flip the script and take the fight to the media enablers and their “winning the culture war.”
alliebobbitt on June 11, 2009 at 2:15 AM
I never said that Letterman’s remarks were “making fun” or that that “fun” would no be hurtful to the targets.
OK. That is like saying if I am truly freedom loving then I shouldn’t have a problem with people taking collective action to enforce X,Y,Z. Depending on what you put in for X,Y,Z, I may certainly have a problem with it. I don’t like people who’s sensibilities have been offended forcing a change in someone else’s life, including employment. Think about it for a while, and I’m sure you can come up with a hypotheical where this type of action would offend you. Again, do you think people should agitate for Rush to be fired because he says things they don’t like?
Yes, but is it a privilege due to the ability to broadcast, or a priviledge because the government lets you do so?
Aquateen Hungerforce on June 11, 2009 at 2:16 AM
You can and should be fired for sexual harassment. Even the President of the US was once taught that lesson.
alliebobbitt on June 11, 2009 at 2:17 AM
(Old stand-by troll tool. Cite Rush Limbaugh for things he’s never said) You obviously never listen to Rush and you don’t read what people write here.
Rush never called for any adolescent to be raped and that’s what offends the folks here on HA.
A freaking new batch of care trolls. Great!
hawkdriver on June 11, 2009 at 2:18 AM
Letterman was not just making a disagreeable comment. He was joking about child rape, even if he says he confused the two daughters and their ages. (The excuse is even creepier, just digging a deeper hole.)
alliebobbitt on June 11, 2009 at 2:20 AM
There’s a big difference between comedy and nationally televised slander of a child. I’m sure See-BS legal staff will be reminding washed-up Dave of those details later on today.
Which reminds me of that email I still need to send to Moonves suggesting now is the golden opportunity to dump doltish-Dave and upgrade Craig Ferguson. If Moonves is smart enough to make that move.
viking01 on June 11, 2009 at 2:21 AM
What Letterman did was a crime. He should be sued for defamation.
Ronnie on June 11, 2009 at 2:22 AM
When they feign concern, you’ve really got them rattled. I’d be surprised if ATHF wasn’t a Letterman writer afraid of the funemployment line.
alliebobbitt on June 11, 2009 at 2:22 AM
You mean like when Obama called for Imus to be fired?
Playing nice doesn’t get us anywhere. I don’t know if we could ever truly sink to the libs’ level, but just taking the high road doesn’t work.
I don’t see anything wrong with pointing out how hypocritical the Left is, and calling for them to follow the same standards they demand of us.
malclave on June 11, 2009 at 2:27 AM
Exactly. My point is that one should go about this by doing personally what one can i.e. not watch and not buy from the advertisers. One should not write letters demanding his firing. Maybe it’s simply stylistic, but I’d leave his employment to the market.
Um, no. But you said that Chelsea was ugly, and that was justification for Rush saying it.
So, by that logic, the Left has a point in the Fairness Doctrine, no?
Heh. You see the circle, no?
Well then, I guess you’re fine wih any interest group/mob denying you, me or anyone else of something they enjoy because it offends their sensibilities.
Aquateen Hungerforce on June 11, 2009 at 2:27 AM
Sarah Palin should send Dave a complimentary set of samurai swords and a small note:
“There are not letter openers.”
profitsbeard on June 11, 2009 at 2:28 AM
It just sounds like another troll whose only function in life is to point out that “Rush says things on the radio too so what are we upset about”.
Watch, this one will turn every thread into an anti-Limbaugh rant.
hawkdriver on June 11, 2009 at 2:28 AM
Aquateen Hungerforce on June 11, 2009 at 2:16 AM
Broadcasting is licensed in accordance with known rules and regulations. Those finding themselves outside those rules are subject to losing those privileges. Janet Jackson excepted, of course.
I’ve been involved in major market broadcasting for over twenty years. Perhaps there’s a different subject of which you have at least minimally adequate knowledge that you want to discuss?
viking01 on June 11, 2009 at 2:28 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 … 5 6 7 8 9 … 11 Next »