Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Frank Gaffney: Hey, maybe Obama’s a Muslim

posted at 10:01 pm on June 9, 2009 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

The funniest part is that he tosses it out there, almost stream-of-consciousness, replete with Hitler analogy and then walks it back by saying it doesn’t much matter if he is or isn’t. As if the president of the United States conspiring to suppress information about his deepest beliefs is a theory to advance idly in the course of a larger foreign-policy critique. Hey, Frank? He can’t be Muslim. As I’ve told you many times, my president is atheist.

Consider this an object lesson in how to instantly discredit your own otherwise cogent op-ed:

This is not to say, necessarily, that Mr. Obama actually is a Muslim any more than Mr. Clinton actually is black. After his five months in office, and most especially after his just-concluded visit to Saudi Arabia and Egypt, however, a stunning conclusion seems increasingly plausible: The man now happy to have his Islamic-rooted middle name featured prominently has engaged in the most consequential bait-and-switch since Adolf Hitler duped Neville Chamberlain over Czechoslovakia at Munich.

With Mr. Obama’s unbelievably ballyhooed address in Cairo Thursday to what he calls “the Muslim world” (hereafter known as “the Speech”), there is mounting evidence that the president not only identifies with Muslims, but actually may still be one himself. Consider the following indicators…

In the final analysis, it may be beside the point whether Mr. Obama actually is a Muslim. In the Speech and elsewhere, he has aligned himself with adherents to what authoritative Islam calls Shariah — notably, the dangerous global movement known as the Muslim Brotherhood — to a degree that makes Mr. Clinton’s fabled affinity for blacks pale by comparison.

“The following indicators” are examples of rhetorical pandering to Muslims in Obama’s Cairo speech, from referring to the Koran as the “holy Koran” to following a mention of Jesus and Mohammed with “peace upon be them.” Secret code words betraying his true religious affiliation? Or … Obama being Obama by trying to find “common ground” with his audience in clumsy, heavy-handed ways? Who even knows if Obama’s responsible for those passages of the speech? Doubtless a whole team of White House wordsmiths worked on it.

Even so, I know that as leader of the Democratic Party he’s conservative enemy number one and always a viable suspect no matter how goofy the charge, so have at it in the comments. Exit question via Karl: I thought our big problem with The One was that he spent far too long subscribing to Rev. Wright’s nutbar Black Liberation Theology. Which is he, a radical Muslim or a radical Christian?


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 ... 3 4 5

Also, YZZ, as to what the distortion should be – I tri-folded a paper to match the COLB and put circles on the page to match where the circles were on the COLB. I held the paper at the angle necessary to get the left edge of the paper to match up with the left edge of the paper on the photo, and then I photographed it with my son’s digital camera. The distortion on the bottom was enough that it actually looked almost square in the photo.

I believe in scientific principles for analysis. I challenge you to reproduce those precise shapes – top and bottom – and angle of the paper’s edges on a single sheet of paper photographed. If you can do it, let me know.

Ron Polarik’s analysis is much, much more detailed and precise. He digitally cut and pasted the “seal” over an actual circle. The “seal” was just barely more tall than wide when compared with an exact circle – which is the wrong type of distortion. Any real distortion would have made the “seal” flatter.

Ron Polarik was able to reproduce exactly what is seen on the COLB by using well-known forgery techniques. If you are able to reproduce exactly what is there by using a real sheet of paper, let me know.

justincase on June 11, 2009 at 12:19 AM

Obama isn’t a Muslim, he’s the anti-Christ.

Jeff from WI on June 11, 2009 at 7:46 AM

Comment pages: 1 ... 3 4 5


You must be logged in to post a comment.