<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CQ: Sotomayor repeatedly made &#8220;wise woman&#8221;/&#8221;wise Latina&#8221; remarks in speeches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/04/cq-sotomayor-repeatedly-made-wise-womanwise-latina-remarks-in-speeches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/04/cq-sotomayor-repeatedly-made-wise-womanwise-latina-remarks-in-speeches/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 21:34:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friday&#8217;s Funnies: Sonia Sotomayor&#8217;s Supreme Court Judge Nomination Political Cartoons &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/04/cq-sotomayor-repeatedly-made-wise-womanwise-latina-remarks-in-speeches/comment-page-3/#comment-2378997</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday&#8217;s Funnies: Sonia Sotomayor&#8217;s Supreme Court Judge Nomination Political Cartoons &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=55136#comment-2378997</guid>
		<description>[...] To Extend To SCOTUS? Hot Air: Video: Sotomayor explains how men subconsciously discriminate and CQ: Sotomayor repeatedly made “wise woman”/”wise Latina” remarks in speeches and Gibbs warns: Be “exceedingly careful” in how you criticize Sotomayor and Top Senate aides: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] To Extend To SCOTUS? Hot Air: Video: Sotomayor explains how men subconsciously discriminate and CQ: Sotomayor repeatedly made “wise woman”/”wise Latina” remarks in speeches and Gibbs warns: Be “exceedingly careful” in how you criticize Sotomayor and Top Senate aides: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Hill&#8217;s Blog Briefing Room &#187; Hot Air</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/04/cq-sotomayor-repeatedly-made-wise-womanwise-latina-remarks-in-speeches/comment-page-3/#comment-2355254</link>
		<dc:creator>The Hill&#8217;s Blog Briefing Room &#187; Hot Air</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=55136#comment-2355254</guid>
		<description>[...] Air    @ 8:32 am by Eric Zimmermann  Allahpundit points out that Sotomayor had made a similar comment to her &quot;wise Latina woman&quot; remark previosuly&#8211;almost a decade before. Liz Cheney accuses Obama [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Air    @ 8:32 am by Eric Zimmermann  Allahpundit points out that Sotomayor had made a similar comment to her &#8220;wise Latina woman&#8221; remark previosuly&#8211;almost a decade before. Liz Cheney accuses Obama [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Let&#8217;s Talk About Sonia Sotomayor Like Grown-Ups &#124; Demockracy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/04/cq-sotomayor-repeatedly-made-wise-womanwise-latina-remarks-in-speeches/comment-page-3/#comment-2314104</link>
		<dc:creator>Let&#8217;s Talk About Sonia Sotomayor Like Grown-Ups &#124; Demockracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 06:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=55136#comment-2314104</guid>
		<description>[...] the money quote that some people are upset about: Whether born from experience or inherent physiological or cultural differences, a possibility I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the money quote that some people are upset about: Whether born from experience or inherent physiological or cultural differences, a possibility I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Voight: Against &#8220;False Prophet&#8221; Obama &#38; Democrat Party: &#8220;Everything Obama Has Recommended Has Turned Out to Be Disastrous&#8230; Breathtaking Speed to Marxism&#8221; &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/04/cq-sotomayor-repeatedly-made-wise-womanwise-latina-remarks-in-speeches/comment-page-3/#comment-2285929</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Voight: Against &#8220;False Prophet&#8221; Obama &#38; Democrat Party: &#8220;Everything Obama Has Recommended Has Turned Out to Be Disastrous&#8230; Breathtaking Speed to Marxism&#8221; &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 23:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=55136#comment-2285929</guid>
		<description>[...] stimulus is a scam Hot Air: Video: Jon Voight goes thermonuclear on “false prophet” Obama and CQ: Sotomayor repeatedly made “wise woman”/”wise Latina” remarks in speeches and Gibbs warns: Be “exceedingly careful” in how you criticize Sotomayor Andrew Breibart, Big [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] stimulus is a scam Hot Air: Video: Jon Voight goes thermonuclear on “false prophet” Obama and CQ: Sotomayor repeatedly made “wise woman”/”wise Latina” remarks in speeches and Gibbs warns: Be “exceedingly careful” in how you criticize Sotomayor Andrew Breibart, Big [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seven</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/04/cq-sotomayor-repeatedly-made-wise-womanwise-latina-remarks-in-speeches/comment-page-3/#comment-2279330</link>
		<dc:creator>seven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 14:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=55136#comment-2279330</guid>
		<description>Tell her to pay her dentist.  It is immoral and unethical to steal services which is what a 15,000 unpaid bill is.  
She is a bad woman.

Just as bad as tax cheats.  Obama wants to tax the bejeebers out of the dentist and he can&#039;t get any traction if the Democrats don&#039;t pay their dentists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell her to pay her dentist.  It is immoral and unethical to steal services which is what a 15,000 unpaid bill is.<br />
She is a bad woman.</p>
<p>Just as bad as tax cheats.  Obama wants to tax the bejeebers out of the dentist and he can&#8217;t get any traction if the Democrats don&#8217;t pay their dentists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MSGTAS</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/04/cq-sotomayor-repeatedly-made-wise-womanwise-latina-remarks-in-speeches/comment-page-3/#comment-2279282</link>
		<dc:creator>MSGTAS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 14:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=55136#comment-2279282</guid>
		<description>White men contaminating La Rosa?  

Is the sir name Sotomayor ethnically pure Hispanic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>White men contaminating La Rosa?  </p>
<p>Is the sir name Sotomayor ethnically pure Hispanic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VinceP1974</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/04/cq-sotomayor-repeatedly-made-wise-womanwise-latina-remarks-in-speeches/comment-page-3/#comment-2277513</link>
		<dc:creator>VinceP1974</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 13:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=55136#comment-2277513</guid>
		<description>Oh and another thing you got wrong , ryandan ... 

Rush and the other conservatives you&#039;re complaingina bout, were the primary public advocates for voting for McCain and Palin.

They all knew the danger of the Obama. They were screaming Red Alert at the top of thier lungs.   They all said we have no choice but to vote for McCain .  I felt the same way.

Once I realized Obama was a Communist in Dec 07, I simply had to swallow my disgust the entire year of 2008 and do all i can to get people not to vote for Obama.

So what are you saying..no one had the right to criticize McCain?  McCain SUCKED . he was God awful candidate. 

He had so many opputunities to put Obama on the spot and he never did.  McCain got on that stage at the RNC and said Fight... Fight with me.. we&#039;ll never give up..

Well he never even started.  

When the banks collapsed in Sept and he started to attack Wall Street instead of the Democrat created Secondary Mortgage Market Architecture with the GSEs at its heart, i knew the idiot was doomed.

McCain defeated himself.

Where were your precious moderates?  Oh they were either publicaly proclaiming they were voting for Obama, or doing thier best to destroy Palin.

Everything you wrote is nonsense.  Your thinking is very poor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and another thing you got wrong , ryandan &#8230; </p>
<p>Rush and the other conservatives you&#8217;re complaingina bout, were the primary public advocates for voting for McCain and Palin.</p>
<p>They all knew the danger of the Obama. They were screaming Red Alert at the top of thier lungs.   They all said we have no choice but to vote for McCain .  I felt the same way.</p>
<p>Once I realized Obama was a Communist in Dec 07, I simply had to swallow my disgust the entire year of 2008 and do all i can to get people not to vote for Obama.</p>
<p>So what are you saying..no one had the right to criticize McCain?  McCain SUCKED . he was God awful candidate. </p>
<p>He had so many opputunities to put Obama on the spot and he never did.  McCain got on that stage at the RNC and said Fight&#8230; Fight with me.. we&#8217;ll never give up..</p>
<p>Well he never even started.  </p>
<p>When the banks collapsed in Sept and he started to attack Wall Street instead of the Democrat created Secondary Mortgage Market Architecture with the GSEs at its heart, i knew the idiot was doomed.</p>
<p>McCain defeated himself.</p>
<p>Where were your precious moderates?  Oh they were either publicaly proclaiming they were voting for Obama, or doing thier best to destroy Palin.</p>
<p>Everything you wrote is nonsense.  Your thinking is very poor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VinceP1974</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/04/cq-sotomayor-repeatedly-made-wise-womanwise-latina-remarks-in-speeches/comment-page-3/#comment-2277505</link>
		<dc:creator>VinceP1974</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 13:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=55136#comment-2277505</guid>
		<description>Since the Left hangs on every word Rush says, I think Rush is trying to inject doubt into the Left&#039;s confidence of Soto&#039;s abortion bonofides.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the Left hangs on every word Rush says, I think Rush is trying to inject doubt into the Left&#8217;s confidence of Soto&#8217;s abortion bonofides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryandan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/04/cq-sotomayor-repeatedly-made-wise-womanwise-latina-remarks-in-speeches/comment-page-3/#comment-2277471</link>
		<dc:creator>ryandan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 11:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=55136#comment-2277471</guid>
		<description>Rush is unreal saying he thinks Sotomayor would overturn Roe.

So the same Rush who beat up McCain for years is now giving the benefit of the doubt to a marxist like Sotomayor who has known the dem establishment for 20 years and they know she is not pro life.

This is too much.  Rush who destroyed McCain and caused hundreds of thousands of conservative purist voters to stay home in Indiana is now saying Sotomayor is pro life.

Yeah McCain was so bad he would have had Fred Thompson picking his supreme court justices.  McCain was a leader in getting Harriet Miers to get withdrawn.

These so called conservative purists complain about sotomayor when they stayed home in mass because McCain didn&#039;t meet their purity test.

So we have permanent affirmative action because of these conservative purists.  Hard working firefighters get the PC reverse discrimination because of these conservative purists who put their own mind games ahead of the country&#039;s well fare.

Yes lets stay home because McCain didn&#039;t vote the way we liked.

If you can&#039;t have some one who isn&#039;t perfect it is better to have a marxist.

Oh their argument was that conservatism would be so strong if only McCain lost.  Only if McCain lost then could republicans succeed in the senate.

Someone forgot to tell these purists that Olympia snowe and Susan Collins would then hold the balance and you needed McCain to veto the bills.

Conservatives have zero power with snowe as the 60th vote.

So much for McCain losing and conservatives having more power in congress.

And the other argument that with McCain losing conservatism would be so strong again like after carter.

Well Carter didn&#039;t pick any supreme court justices.

Try getting conservatives fired up for future elections after Obama has stacked the supreme court for the next 25 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rush is unreal saying he thinks Sotomayor would overturn Roe.</p>
<p>So the same Rush who beat up McCain for years is now giving the benefit of the doubt to a marxist like Sotomayor who has known the dem establishment for 20 years and they know she is not pro life.</p>
<p>This is too much.  Rush who destroyed McCain and caused hundreds of thousands of conservative purist voters to stay home in Indiana is now saying Sotomayor is pro life.</p>
<p>Yeah McCain was so bad he would have had Fred Thompson picking his supreme court justices.  McCain was a leader in getting Harriet Miers to get withdrawn.</p>
<p>These so called conservative purists complain about sotomayor when they stayed home in mass because McCain didn&#8217;t meet their purity test.</p>
<p>So we have permanent affirmative action because of these conservative purists.  Hard working firefighters get the PC reverse discrimination because of these conservative purists who put their own mind games ahead of the country&#8217;s well fare.</p>
<p>Yes lets stay home because McCain didn&#8217;t vote the way we liked.</p>
<p>If you can&#8217;t have some one who isn&#8217;t perfect it is better to have a marxist.</p>
<p>Oh their argument was that conservatism would be so strong if only McCain lost.  Only if McCain lost then could republicans succeed in the senate.</p>
<p>Someone forgot to tell these purists that Olympia snowe and Susan Collins would then hold the balance and you needed McCain to veto the bills.</p>
<p>Conservatives have zero power with snowe as the 60th vote.</p>
<p>So much for McCain losing and conservatives having more power in congress.</p>
<p>And the other argument that with McCain losing conservatism would be so strong again like after carter.</p>
<p>Well Carter didn&#8217;t pick any supreme court justices.</p>
<p>Try getting conservatives fired up for future elections after Obama has stacked the supreme court for the next 25 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ted c</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/04/cq-sotomayor-repeatedly-made-wise-womanwise-latina-remarks-in-speeches/comment-page-3/#comment-2276793</link>
		<dc:creator>ted c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 23:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=55136#comment-2276793</guid>
		<description>One would hope that a wise white man would pay back his debts in better fashion than this latina.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One would hope that a wise white man would pay back his debts in better fashion than this latina.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Repeated Bias: Sotomayor Has Made &#8216;Wise Latina/Better Decisions&#8217; Remark Several Times &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/04/cq-sotomayor-repeatedly-made-wise-womanwise-latina-remarks-in-speeches/comment-page-3/#comment-2276520</link>
		<dc:creator>Repeated Bias: Sotomayor Has Made &#8216;Wise Latina/Better Decisions&#8217; Remark Several Times &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 19:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=55136#comment-2276520</guid>
		<description>[...] reading: GayPatriot: Do We REALLY Need Identity Politics To Extend To SCOTUS? Hot Air: CQ: Sotomayor repeatedly made “wise woman”/”wise Latina” remarks in speeches and Gibbs warns: Be “exceedingly careful” in how you criticize Sotomayor and Top Senate aides: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reading: GayPatriot: Do We REALLY Need Identity Politics To Extend To SCOTUS? Hot Air: CQ: Sotomayor repeatedly made “wise woman”/”wise Latina” remarks in speeches and Gibbs warns: Be “exceedingly careful” in how you criticize Sotomayor and Top Senate aides: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Wise Doughy Leg&#8221; Endorses Sotomayor &#171; Chris Matthew&#8217;s Leg</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/04/cq-sotomayor-repeatedly-made-wise-womanwise-latina-remarks-in-speeches/comment-page-3/#comment-2276407</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Wise Doughy Leg&#8221; Endorses Sotomayor &#171; Chris Matthew&#8217;s Leg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 17:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=55136#comment-2276407</guid>
		<description>[...] is why The Leg gave its most vigorous endorsement to Sonia Sotomayor for SCOTUS today. &#8220;I think the President (may his name be lauded) made a brilliant choice,&#8221; The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is why The Leg gave its most vigorous endorsement to Sonia Sotomayor for SCOTUS today. &#8220;I think the President (may his name be lauded) made a brilliant choice,&#8221; The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maverick muse</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/04/cq-sotomayor-repeatedly-made-wise-womanwise-latina-remarks-in-speeches/comment-page-3/#comment-2275864</link>
		<dc:creator>maverick muse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 12:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=55136#comment-2275864</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;she owes in excess of $400,000 to various creditors&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The obligatory implications that influence her decisions can&#039;t be dismissed. No falling back to reference coming from poverty only to abuse credit when earning sufficient to pay her own way. This person is sick. Owing $400K does influence one&#039;s perspective regarding bail-outs, let alone cases against the credit industry.

Outrageous up to date. Insufferable from the SCOTUS.

Her wise ass reference to female wisdom is a cheap advertisement to creditors: 

&lt;strong&gt;Sotomayor judgments are all on lien.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>she owes in excess of $400,000 to various creditors</p></blockquote>
<p>The obligatory implications that influence her decisions can&#8217;t be dismissed. No falling back to reference coming from poverty only to abuse credit when earning sufficient to pay her own way. This person is sick. Owing $400K does influence one&#8217;s perspective regarding bail-outs, let alone cases against the credit industry.</p>
<p>Outrageous up to date. Insufferable from the SCOTUS.</p>
<p>Her wise ass reference to female wisdom is a cheap advertisement to creditors: </p>
<p><strong>Sotomayor judgments are all on lien.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JellyToast</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/04/cq-sotomayor-repeatedly-made-wise-womanwise-latina-remarks-in-speeches/comment-page-3/#comment-2275778</link>
		<dc:creator>JellyToast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 08:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=55136#comment-2275778</guid>
		<description>She looks mad even when she&#039;s smiling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She looks mad even when she&#8217;s smiling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: petunia</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/04/cq-sotomayor-repeatedly-made-wise-womanwise-latina-remarks-in-speeches/comment-page-3/#comment-2275753</link>
		<dc:creator>petunia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 05:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=55136#comment-2275753</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;• Lin v. U.S. Department of Justice, 2007: Dissented as a majority rejected bids for asylum from men whose spouses were subjected in China to forced abortion or sterilization. Sotomayor said the court departed from precedent when it tied an applicant&#039;s eligibility for asylum to persecution suffered &quot;personally.&quot; She said, &quot;The majority clings to the notion that the persecution suffered is physically visited upon only one spouse, but this simply ignores the question of whom exactly the government was seeking to persecute. ...&lt;strong&gt; The harm is clearly directed at the couple. ... The termination of a wanted pregnancy under a coercive population-control program can only be devastating to any couple, akin, no doubt, to the killing of a child.&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ah Hah!!!! The above ruling was written by Sotomayor! Notice that she is at least capable of admitting that abortion can be considered &lt;strong&gt;&quot;akin...to the killing of a child.&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;
She is racially motivated in many ways, no doubt. But she is not the end of the world as a Supreme Court pick.  She has the makings of another vote for the Pro-life cause. This also seems to indicate an admission that men have an emotional stake in abortion!

At this point we shouldn&#039;t be making so much noise that Obama withdraws her!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>• Lin v. U.S. Department of Justice, 2007: Dissented as a majority rejected bids for asylum from men whose spouses were subjected in China to forced abortion or sterilization. Sotomayor said the court departed from precedent when it tied an applicant&#8217;s eligibility for asylum to persecution suffered &#8220;personally.&#8221; She said, &#8220;The majority clings to the notion that the persecution suffered is physically visited upon only one spouse, but this simply ignores the question of whom exactly the government was seeking to persecute. &#8230;<strong> The harm is clearly directed at the couple. &#8230; The termination of a wanted pregnancy under a coercive population-control program can only be devastating to any couple, akin, no doubt, to the killing of a child.&#8221;</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Ah Hah!!!! The above ruling was written by Sotomayor! Notice that she is at least capable of admitting that abortion can be considered <strong>&#8220;akin&#8230;to the killing of a child.&#8221;</strong><br />
She is racially motivated in many ways, no doubt. But she is not the end of the world as a Supreme Court pick.  She has the makings of another vote for the Pro-life cause. This also seems to indicate an admission that men have an emotional stake in abortion!</p>
<p>At this point we shouldn&#8217;t be making so much noise that Obama withdraws her!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geochelone</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/04/cq-sotomayor-repeatedly-made-wise-womanwise-latina-remarks-in-speeches/comment-page-3/#comment-2275748</link>
		<dc:creator>Geochelone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 05:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=55136#comment-2275748</guid>
		<description>La Raza is a Hispanic front group that foments hatred against Whitey and Blacks and Asians. La Raza is a stealth racists organization that walks a tight line. They get what they want by political strong arming; as opposed to outright lynching like the KKK did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>La Raza is a Hispanic front group that foments hatred against Whitey and Blacks and Asians. La Raza is a stealth racists organization that walks a tight line. They get what they want by political strong arming; as opposed to outright lynching like the KKK did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mankai</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/04/cq-sotomayor-repeatedly-made-wise-womanwise-latina-remarks-in-speeches/comment-page-3/#comment-2275360</link>
		<dc:creator>mankai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 01:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=55136#comment-2275360</guid>
		<description>Id like a definition of &quot;white.&quot; Ive asked for it for over 20 years... and I&#039;ve yet to get a good answer.

I think Scalia and Alito would be surprised to find that they were Anglo-Saxons. What? They&#039;re not &quot;ethnic&quot; enough for her? Spanish descendants are somehow less European than Italian descendants?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Id like a definition of &#8220;white.&#8221; Ive asked for it for over 20 years&#8230; and I&#8217;ve yet to get a good answer.</p>
<p>I think Scalia and Alito would be surprised to find that they were Anglo-Saxons. What? They&#8217;re not &#8220;ethnic&#8221; enough for her? Spanish descendants are somehow less European than Italian descendants?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mankai</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/04/cq-sotomayor-repeatedly-made-wise-womanwise-latina-remarks-in-speeches/comment-page-3/#comment-2275350</link>
		<dc:creator>mankai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 01:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=55136#comment-2275350</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;    They’re “Uncle Todds.”

    mankai on June 5, 2009 at 11:18 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

We need to popularize that term so there is a negative stigma attached to it. The power of ridicule is underestimated.

moonbat monitor on June 5, 2009 at 11:21 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&quot;Uncle Todds&quot; TM

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<blockquote><p>    They’re “Uncle Todds.”</p>
<p>    mankai on June 5, 2009 at 11:18 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>We need to popularize that term so there is a negative stigma attached to it. The power of ridicule is underestimated.</p>
<p>moonbat monitor on June 5, 2009 at 11:21 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8220;Uncle Todds&#8221; TM</p>
<p>:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cybergeezer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/04/cq-sotomayor-repeatedly-made-wise-womanwise-latina-remarks-in-speeches/comment-page-3/#comment-2274898</link>
		<dc:creator>Cybergeezer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 22:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=55136#comment-2274898</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;This woman has such outstanding intelligence and is so elevated in common sense and logic, how can she stand to be associated with such a dunce as Obama?&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>This woman has such outstanding intelligence and is so elevated in common sense and logic, how can she stand to be associated with such a dunce as Obama?</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Driefromseattle</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/04/cq-sotomayor-repeatedly-made-wise-womanwise-latina-remarks-in-speeches/comment-page-3/#comment-2274803</link>
		<dc:creator>Driefromseattle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 22:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=55136#comment-2274803</guid>
		<description>&quot;White Men?  We don&#039;t need no stinking white men!!&quot;  

There is NOTHING about the liberal left that is wise!  To declare one the wisest of them all because of race or gender is exceedingly unwise!  There is always a great number of people who will come along and prove one wrong!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;White Men?  We don&#8217;t need no stinking white men!!&#8221;  </p>
<p>There is NOTHING about the liberal left that is wise!  To declare one the wisest of them all because of race or gender is exceedingly unwise!  There is always a great number of people who will come along and prove one wrong!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daggett</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/04/cq-sotomayor-repeatedly-made-wise-womanwise-latina-remarks-in-speeches/comment-page-3/#comment-2274701</link>
		<dc:creator>Daggett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 21:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=55136#comment-2274701</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I thought she was supposed to be smart? Who keeps 30 grand in a bank account? Has she never heard of stocks, bonds, or CDs?

Vashta.Nerada on June 5, 2009 at 12:59 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Maybe she knows something we don&#039;t know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I thought she was supposed to be smart? Who keeps 30 grand in a bank account? Has she never heard of stocks, bonds, or CDs?</p>
<p>Vashta.Nerada on June 5, 2009 at 12:59 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Maybe she knows something we don&#8217;t know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sen. Orrin Hatch Questions Sonia Sotomayor&#8217;s Activist Statements (videos) &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/04/cq-sotomayor-repeatedly-made-wise-womanwise-latina-remarks-in-speeches/comment-page-3/#comment-2274543</link>
		<dc:creator>Sen. Orrin Hatch Questions Sonia Sotomayor&#8217;s Activist Statements (videos) &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 20:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=55136#comment-2274543</guid>
		<description>[...] to Gun Rights, Scholar Says Greg Gutfeld, Big Hollywood: Daily Gut: The Reign of Race Hot Air: CQ: Sotomayor repeatedly made “wise woman”/”wise Latina” remarks in speechesand Gibbs warns: Be “exceedingly careful” in how you criticize Sotomayor and The Opportunity on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to Gun Rights, Scholar Says Greg Gutfeld, Big Hollywood: Daily Gut: The Reign of Race Hot Air: CQ: Sotomayor repeatedly made “wise woman”/”wise Latina” remarks in speechesand Gibbs warns: Be “exceedingly careful” in how you criticize Sotomayor and The Opportunity on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warning Signs about Sonia Sotomayor, from Andrew Breitbart &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/04/cq-sotomayor-repeatedly-made-wise-womanwise-latina-remarks-in-speeches/comment-page-3/#comment-2274535</link>
		<dc:creator>Warning Signs about Sonia Sotomayor, from Andrew Breitbart &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 20:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=55136#comment-2274535</guid>
		<description>[...] reading: Hot Air: CQ: Sotomayor repeatedly made “wise woman”/”wise Latina” remarks in speeches and Gibbs warns: Be “exceedingly careful” in how you criticize Sotomayor and Top Senate aides: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reading: Hot Air: CQ: Sotomayor repeatedly made “wise woman”/”wise Latina” remarks in speeches and Gibbs warns: Be “exceedingly careful” in how you criticize Sotomayor and Top Senate aides: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dogsoldier</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/04/cq-sotomayor-repeatedly-made-wise-womanwise-latina-remarks-in-speeches/comment-page-2/#comment-2274207</link>
		<dc:creator>dogsoldier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=55136#comment-2274207</guid>
		<description>How much proof is required before a person identifies themselves as a toxic bigot?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much proof is required before a person identifies themselves as a toxic bigot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: philwynk</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/04/cq-sotomayor-repeatedly-made-wise-womanwise-latina-remarks-in-speeches/comment-page-2/#comment-2273694</link>
		<dc:creator>philwynk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 17:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=55136#comment-2273694</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;1. Is this just another example of failed vetting?

gobblemom on June 5, 2009 at 10:02 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

She was vetted completely. Sotomayor is most likely a repeat of Obama: a hard-core, neo-Marxist intent on bringing full socialism to America, masquerading as a moderate Democrat in order to achieve a position of real power. I have little doubt that Obama knows who most of those people are, and is looking for every opportunity to appoint one to any top position available.

Ideological purity is the primary qualification they&#039;re looking for. Judicial quality only appears on the list of qualifications as a means of slipping her past the Senate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>1. Is this just another example of failed vetting?</p>
<p>gobblemom on June 5, 2009 at 10:02 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>She was vetted completely. Sotomayor is most likely a repeat of Obama: a hard-core, neo-Marxist intent on bringing full socialism to America, masquerading as a moderate Democrat in order to achieve a position of real power. I have little doubt that Obama knows who most of those people are, and is looking for every opportunity to appoint one to any top position available.</p>
<p>Ideological purity is the primary qualification they&#8217;re looking for. Judicial quality only appears on the list of qualifications as a means of slipping her past the Senate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
