Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Bernanke’s deficit warning an opening for Obama?

posted at 3:55 pm on June 4, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

When Ben Bernanke warned Congress yesterday of the dangers in the escalating debt of the US, many took that as a rebuke to both Congress and the White House on their profligate spending.  However, James Pethokoukis sees an opportunity for Barack Obama rather than a warning.  Bernanke’s statements could give Obama sufficient cover to expand tax increases far beyond the limits he originally promised:

Chatter about budget deficits and fiscal responsibility is exactly what Team Obama needs right now. Here’s why: If you buy the theory of bond vigilantism — that credit markets will force interest rates higher in reaction to unsustainable national budget deficits — then you also have believe the White House will need to raise taxes sharply to pay for all its spending programs or risk a revolt. Indeed, plenty of White House folks, particularly if they worked for Bill Clinton, likely do believe in the theory. Recall that it was Clinton who chucked his investment agenda in favor of a “bond market strategy” to boost growth by persuading credit markets that the administration would balance the books. As Clinton nicely boiled it down, “You mean to tell me that the success of the program and my reelection hinges on the Federal Reserve and a bunch of [expletive] bond traders?”

… And today, Bernanke’s sharp warning contributed to that effort. So not only has Bernanke’s unprecedented monetary stimulus allowed Obama to focus on pushing forward his policy agenda rather than a pure stimulus effort (such as a suspension of payroll taxes), but the weight of his authority is now being used to help persuade Americans that the budget deficit is the Next Scary Problem. In short, Bernanke is “preparing the battlespace” for Obama tax initiatives to pay for Obamacare and who knows what else. What more could one Fed chairman do for a Democratic president?

It could also be that Bernanke wants to warn Congress about treading down the path of ObamaCare.  Reuters reported Bernanke’s comments on debt and long-term prospects for economic growth:

“We now are on a process of slow and gradual repair, both in the financial system and the economy,” he said. “We averted, I think, a very, very serious calamity.”

He said financial markets had improved, thanks in part to the Fed’s efforts to restore lending, but he also took note of the recent spike in yields on longer-term Treasury debt and fixed-rate mortgages, which some analysts worry could choke off an economic recovery.

“These increases appear to reflect concerns about large federal deficits but also other causes, including greater optimism about the economic outlook, a reversal of flight-to-quality flows, and technical factors related to the hedging of mortgage holdings,” Bernanke said.

Either way, the warning gives Obama a political opening for the use of the deficit to escalate tax rates across a broad swath of Americans, and not just the upper 5% as he promised during the campaign.  With deficits already projected at staggering levels and a downturn in revenues guaranteed to make them much worse than predicted, the US has to demonstrate that it can pay down the debt and provide return to bondholders without the inflationary device of printing money.  Obama could do that by scaling back federal spending, but he’s not about to do that after using the crisis to get Congressional approval for a wide range of liberal pet projects in the guise of a stimulus package.

Major tax increases will have to come.  The question will be whether Obama can hold off on them until 2011 and still maintain a market for Treasuries at reasonable yields.  He can’t impose the kinds of sweeping tax increases necessary to keep pace with the debt and expect to hold seats in Congress, so this year and 2010 are out.  If, though, Bernanke’s prediction about debt interfering with the recovery proves correct, Obama will have a miserable midterm election regardless.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages:

Yeah, it’s kind of like when Greenspan warned Clinton about deficit spending and thought that the raising of taxes was just as good of an option as cutting spending.

myrenovations on June 4, 2009 at 3:58 PM

Modus Operandi of democratic officials:

Although they always deny it.

Tax and Spend! He is just changing the order.

IlikedAUH2O on June 4, 2009 at 4:00 PM

Major tax increases will have to come. The question will be whether Obama can hold off on them until 2011 and still maintain a market for Treasuries at reasonable yields. He can’t impose the kinds of sweeping tax increases necessary to keep pace with the debt and expect to hold seats in Congress, so this year and 2010 are out. If, though, Bernanke’s prediction about debt interfering with the recovery proves correct, Obama will have a miserable midterm election regardless

Any record of Obama saying, “Read my lips. No new taxes”? Presidents who say that and raise taxes sometimes don’t get re-elected.

Or maybe Obama thinks 2010 census fraud, a fawning media and union money from new card-check union dues will carry him through 2012, regardless of what he says or does.

Wethal on June 4, 2009 at 4:01 PM

Yea, he’s definitely right. This is exactly what this was. Bernanke has totally abandoned what the Fed was designed to be: Independent from the US govt. He’s doing Obama’s bidding for him, so he can come and say “the situation is so bad, if we don’t raise taxes, we’re going to hell in a handbasket”. It’s the alley for Obama to oop.

youngO on June 4, 2009 at 4:01 PM

treasury yields spiked again today…. the 2s10s spread hit another record high

BPD on June 4, 2009 at 4:01 PM

Bernanke’s statements could give Obama sufficient cover to expand tax increases far beyond the limits he originally promised

Watching the tax increase battle here in Illinois I say Bernanke’s statements to NOT provide cover for tax increases. Tax increases in this climate appear to political no-go zone. If Obama thinks he needs to go their soon. I say do it, so we can shorten his period that he has vast power.

WashJeff on June 4, 2009 at 4:01 PM

Alright people, get ready to simply send your entire paycheck to the U.S. Treasury for deposit. Redistribution of wealth . . . you haven’t seen anything yet.

rplat on June 4, 2009 at 4:01 PM

Good Lord, is Igor Panarin going to be right?

upinak on June 4, 2009 at 4:02 PM

Major tax increases will have to come. The question will be whether Obama can hold off on them until 2011 and still maintain a market for Treasuries at reasonable yields.

Without lifting a finger, he gets an across-the-board income tax increase when the Bush cuts expire at the end of this year. During the campaign, I think he stated that he’d let them expire on “the rich,” but he’d offer legislation to preserve them for everyone else. Somehow, I think he’s going to forget about that.

He better do something to fix the federal estate tax, because it disappears in 2010, only to reappear in 2011 at past levels. This needs some action.

BuckeyeSam on June 4, 2009 at 4:03 PM

Remember, it takes legislation to raise taxes so tighten the vice on those congressional politicians . . . no new taxes.

rplat on June 4, 2009 at 4:03 PM

More taxes will kill incentive, which will further economic contractions, which will yield less revenue to the Fed. Govt., which will make the deficit worse. So he’ll “need” to raise taxes, which will kill incentive, and on and on and on. Case and point.

Weight of Glory on June 4, 2009 at 4:04 PM

At this point in Obama’s ratings, I think if people asked him for food, he could scoop up some dirt in his hand and the people would cheer.

We are living in an age of insanity.

shick on June 4, 2009 at 4:04 PM

Bernanke’s statements could give Obama sufficient cover to expand tax increases far beyond the limits he originally promised:

Far worse. The Precedent and lunatic Congress are going to move far past taxes on income and right into the naked confiscation of wealth.

People still don’t realize where this fool is going. He talked about “spreading the wealth”, not “spreading the income”. Be warned.

progressoverpeace on June 4, 2009 at 4:05 PM

B-b-b-b-b-but he promised…..we wouldn’t see a dime in higher taxes!!!! You mean….he LIED???????

capejasmine on June 4, 2009 at 4:05 PM

He knows he’s going to lose congress which is why they have to have all their socialist garbage this year.

elduende on June 4, 2009 at 4:06 PM

He can’t impose the kinds of sweeping tax increases necessary to keep pace with the debt… –Ed

NO tax increase can keep pace with the debt, particularly once Obamacare kicks in. 100% tax on everybody might do it, but I’m doubtful even of that. We can’t even make the interest payments on the debt at this point. It’s officially impossible now.

aero on June 4, 2009 at 4:06 PM

Remember, it takes legislation to raise taxes so tighten the vice on those congressional politicians . . . no new taxes.

rplat on June 4, 2009 at 4:03 PM

Wrong. He’ll just appoint a Tax Czar.

Problem solved.

Knucklehead on June 4, 2009 at 4:06 PM

Obama will just use the same lame excuse about “sacrificing for our children” so he can do whatever he wants and the Obama MSM will drool, wag their tails, and defend their guy as if he is doing the best thing ever for the economy.

People will be busy watching “I’m a Celebrity…” to pay attention.

jencab on June 4, 2009 at 4:08 PM

Wrong. He’ll just appoint a Tax Czar.

Problem solved.

Knucklehead on June 4, 2009 at 4:06 PM

ugh!

upinak on June 4, 2009 at 4:08 PM

Dems and the Media have this down to a fine art form.

Cut taxes and people will starve, houses will burn, prisons will be empty.

the 100’s of thousands of government workers/retirees not much change.

Step 2. 100’s of AP stories on the meta-theme…can an advanced nation really have people starving in the street????

r keller on June 4, 2009 at 4:09 PM

An interesting comment from a financial site:

Open Letter to Mr. Benjamin Shalom Bernanke. 3-Jun-09 03:09 pm
Ben. Benny. Benjamin. Helicopter Ben. The Benmiester. Printing money.

I noticed your lips and eyes were twitching during the 60 Minutes interview. That is some nervous twitch you’ve got going there! I would be nervous too if I were you. Aren’t you a republican appointee? Well then why would you risk your career and reputation to save a democrat’s presidency? Obama came into office like a communist bat out of hell, complained about the deficit he inherited and then turned around and TRIPLED IT. Where on earth will he get the money? He thinks sending out that moron geithner to convince the Chinese their assets are safe will work? They laughed at him. Who’s gonna buy those treasuries when foreign demand dries up?

You? But why? I don’t understand. Everytime a country has printed money it has led to inflation. This will be no different. In fact, if you continue on this trend, inflation will be so bad that you will be put on trial.

The trial will be televised. And you will have to explain why you printed so much money.

Is it worth it? Look where the money went. It went to keep people in houses they couldn’t afford anyway. It went to banks who lent those people the money to “buy” those houses. It went to car companies so full of business majors that they don’t even know how to produce cars anymore, at least at a profit anyway. Is it worth it? This economy will collapse because money is being stolen from competent workers and showered on criminally incompetent leeches.

Is that what you want your legacy to be? Why? Why are you trying to suppress rates? Just let them rise. Let people who were responsible own those houses. Let incompetent firms go away. It’s called creative destruction. It’s called moral hazard. Have you never heard these terms? Stop enabling this government to destory this country and destroy the dollar.

You stated you will be buying treasuries and MBSs. WHY? MBSs are worthless. They are JUNK. Ben, you have a choice. If you continue to expand your balance sheet with worthless junk you will either be put on trial or sent to an insane asylum. Do you feel like the walls are closing in sometimes? Is it hard to catch your breath? Do you feel someday people will wake up and realize the CPI and unemployment numbers are rigged and will revolt? They will realize it was because of YOU that they are living in a third world country. That’s right Ben. The clock is ticking.

JiangxiDad on June 4, 2009 at 4:10 PM

Bernanke’s statements could give Obama sufficient cover to expand tax increases far beyond the limits he originally promised

Cover? Right, because nobody’s going to remember that it was Obama who insisted on the trillion dollars ($800 billion plus interest) of worthless pork spending in the non-stimulus “stimulus” bill that got us into this mess, and nobody’s going to remember that Barry promised that only “the rich” would be paying more taxes.

I almost hope Barry does succeed in raising taxes after 2010 — and lots of them. It means we’ll be getting rid of him in 2012, and that can only be for the good.

AZCoyote on June 4, 2009 at 4:10 PM

I think Bernanke’s statement was meant more for bond market than anything else.

And the message is this: If you continue to help fund the spending, future tax increases will crash the entire market. IOW, raise the bond rates. Now.

BobMbx on June 4, 2009 at 4:11 PM

So he promises the 95% that he won’t tax them. Then he spends so ridiculously that he has no choice but to tax them. But then they vote for him in 2012 anyway.

ctmom on June 4, 2009 at 4:12 PM

BobMbx on June 4, 2009 at 4:11 PM

That could well be true, Bob. The only thing that can stop this junta are the markets.

progressoverpeace on June 4, 2009 at 4:12 PM

Alright people, get ready to simply send your entire paycheck to the U.S. Treasury for deposit. Redistribution of wealth . . . you haven’t seen anything yet.

rplat on June 4, 2009 at 4:01 PM

I have already fired myself. I don’t pay taxes.
I have invested most of my money in brass & lead.

izoneguy on June 4, 2009 at 4:13 PM

Ideology trumps reality in the Obama administration.

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on June 4, 2009 at 4:13 PM

Look, a wise latina!

LibTired (KO) on June 4, 2009 at 4:14 PM

BARACK OBAMA: MESSIAH ANGEL OF DEBT.

Dr. Charles G. Waugh on June 4, 2009 at 4:14 PM

I really don’t think taxes can be raised enough to cover Obama’s spending. That won’t keep him from trying, however.

zmdavid on June 4, 2009 at 4:17 PM

PLEASE tell me that no regular reader of this site thought for more than three seconds that Obama was not going to raise taxes to rates unseen since Carter…

Once again, the underpants gnomes have ventured from the White House caves with a detailed plan for where all this money will come from…

BKeyser on June 4, 2009 at 4:17 PM

Look, a wise latina!

LibTired (KO) on June 4, 2009 at 4:14 PM

I SEE HER!!! I SEE HER DOUBLE CHIN!!!! AND SHE IS SMARTER THAN A WHITE MAN BECAUSE OF HER EXPERIENCE ALONE!!!!!!

Ghoul aid on June 4, 2009 at 4:17 PM

Oil soars to new high for ‘09. $68.81/gal. Gasoline in NY is nearly $3/gal.

Gold soars to new high in ‘09, rapidly approaching $1000/0z.

We’re gonna get high unemployment,and inflation, and high taxes, and the sooner the better to turn the people against Pharaoh Hussein, and start putting our economy back in order.

JiangxiDad on June 4, 2009 at 4:18 PM

If, though, Bernanke’s prediction about debt interfering with the recovery proves correct, Obama will have a miserable midterm election regardless.

No he won’t. He’s interfereing now and his voters don’t care. A good friend of mine wants him to do more… AND raise taxes.

FDR was a disaster and won re-election three times. In 1936 things had gotten worse and there was little improvement by 1940. “Hope” is a very powerful drug.

mankai on June 4, 2009 at 4:18 PM

How about everyone file an extension for 2009 – so the tax coffers suffer between April – August…

Odie1941 on June 4, 2009 at 4:18 PM

In short, Bernanke is “preparing the battlespace” for Obama tax initiatives to pay for Obamacare and who knows what else.

“Never let a serious crisis go to waste. What I mean by that is it’s an opportunity to do things you couldn’t do before.”

– Rahm Emmanuel, November 2008

Cicero43 on June 4, 2009 at 4:18 PM

Oh, this is rich.

but the weight of his authority is now being used to help persuade Americans that the budget deficit is the Next Scary Problem.

The out of control budget deficit exists because government f–ked up the LAST Scary Problem (credit implosion) which existed because government f–ked up the PREVIOUS Scary Problem (not enough housing for poor people).

Daggett on June 4, 2009 at 4:18 PM

It’s Congress that increases taxes, not the President. At least in theory. So there’s one more step before the tax increases, and it has to be taken by people who probably don’t want to be blamed by the voters.

Attila (Pillage Idiot) on June 4, 2009 at 4:19 PM

Look, a wise latina!

LibTired (KO) on June 4, 2009 at 4:14 PM

Look! Royalty going to a Broadway show!

Daggett on June 4, 2009 at 4:20 PM

Oh, this is rich.

but the weight of his authority is now being used to help persuade Americans that the budget deficit is the Next Scary Problem.

The out of control budget deficit exists because government f–ked up the LAST Scary Problem (credit implosion) which existed because government f–ked up the PREVIOUS Scary Problem (not enough housing for poor people).

Daggett on June 4, 2009 at 4:18 PM

It’s the politicians that have caused the problem. And most of them have a (D) by their name.

izoneguy on June 4, 2009 at 4:20 PM

Raise taxes NOW!!!

What’s the difference between slavery and debt you can never repay.

tarpon on June 4, 2009 at 4:21 PM

If he raises taxes, HIS multi-trillion stimulus package has FAILED.

There’s no other answer.

Skywise on June 4, 2009 at 4:21 PM

Honestly if he is going spend this much, he should raise taxes. The morons who voted for this man should pay the bill for his outrageous spending, not our children and our children’s children.

Americans should be able to see the cost of what they want from this man. There is no free lunch and no one seems to get that.

brandozilla on June 4, 2009 at 4:23 PM

A lot of people are out of work or have just had to cut back drastically. I don’t think they are going to tolerate all these tax increases. It’s just no the feds, but the state and local government. And there are a million ways to tax you by increasing the cost of everything. And on top of that he wants to soak us for his b.s. healthcare plan?

Blake on June 4, 2009 at 4:24 PM

Although diminished, still plenty of available wealth in 401k plans. Low hanging fruit. Isn’t that a route Peron took? It has to happen, sooner or later,..probably sooner at the rate things are falling apart.

a capella on June 4, 2009 at 4:24 PM

Odie1941 on June 4, 2009 at 4:18 PM

Ya know, that’s not a bad idea. Thinking about it.

PappaMac on June 4, 2009 at 4:27 PM

Obama has been hinting at tax increases for a while. There can be no mystery here. Look at Deval Patrick in Taxacoosits if you want a model.

JAW on June 4, 2009 at 4:27 PM

I just LOVE how the liberals think taxing more is the answer when spending is at such a level that it has (or soon will) eclipse all the spending in this country’s history.

I don’t believe for a minute this SOB is patriotic. You don’t send your country into a permanent fiscal crapper and put it’s security and future at risk if you have even half a care about it’s future existence.

He’s a traitor. Plain and simple.

Spiritk9 on June 4, 2009 at 4:28 PM

Oh, this is rich.

but the weight of his authority is now being used to help persuade Americans that the budget deficit is the Next Scary Problem.

The out of control budget deficit exists because government f–ked up the LAST Scary Problem (credit implosion) which existed because government f–ked up the PREVIOUS Scary Problem (not enough housing for poor people).

Daggett on June 4, 2009 at 4:18 PM

Obama replaces cluster-bomb with cluster-f**k.

Dr. Charles G. Waugh on June 4, 2009 at 4:30 PM

a capella on June 4, 2009 at 4:24 PM

There was a presentation given to a group of Dem House members last fall. I think it was a Harvard economist (figures). Theory was to get rid of the tax benefits for all IRAs and 401(k)s. Offer a government pension plan that would guarantee 5% return. When you died, half of it would go to your heirs. The other half….

Wethal on June 4, 2009 at 4:30 PM

This is like a hideous car crash. Everything is moving in slow motion before my eyes, and I know that the outcome isn’t going to be good.

PappaMac on June 4, 2009 at 4:31 PM

GDP growth is already going to lag Obama’s 4% growth estimates because of a fundamental change in the consumer. Tax increases will further reduce consumer spending and result in more layoffs and businesses closing.

On the other hand investors are poised to increase US borrowing costs if the budget isn’t addressed. Oh well, Treasury is probably going to make a nice return from their bank investments.

dedalus on June 4, 2009 at 4:31 PM

If he raises taxes in a way that affects small-medium businesses, then businesses will cut back and unemployment will skyrocket.

Twenty-percent unemployment will become the Next Scary Problem After This One.

Daggett on June 4, 2009 at 4:32 PM

dedalus on June 4, 2009 at 4:31 PM

Great minds.

Daggett on June 4, 2009 at 4:33 PM

PappaMac on June 4, 2009 at 4:27 PM

Perfectly legal – and in masse – would devastate the federal gov spending. Though I fear our soldiers would be screwed.

Perhaps TurboTax would like to get back at Geitner for destroying their brand – and offer the service for $10…

Odie1941 on June 4, 2009 at 4:33 PM

This is like a hideous car crash. Everything is moving in slow motion before my eyes, and I know that the outcome isn’t going to be good.
PappaMac on June 4, 2009 at 4:31 PM

No worries, we are all destined to die hideously in car crashes when we’re forced to buy GuvMotor Deathtrap GT’s.

Bishop on June 4, 2009 at 4:35 PM

There is no free lunch and no one seems to get that.

brandozilla on June 4, 2009 at 4:23 PM

I agree in principle, except for that we are approaching that very dangerous level when nearly half the country pays no federal taxes – about as close to a free lunch as you can get.

redfoxbluestate on June 4, 2009 at 4:38 PM

I agree in principle, except for that we are approaching that very dangerous level when nearly half the country pays no federal taxes – about as close to a free lunch as you can get.

Their children will pay, its not as though the rich are footing the bill for the entire budget. They what, 1.8 billion short?

brandozilla on June 4, 2009 at 4:40 PM

I still think this is all deliberate. Create a total economic meltdown – the ultimate “crisis.”

Obama gets to “rescue” it with his socialist utopia.

Soros gets a fecesload of money by selling the dollar short.

It’s a win-win strategy for all the crooks. It’s called the Cloward-Piven strategy.

Daggett on June 4, 2009 at 4:43 PM

The out of control budget deficit exists because government f–ked up the LAST Scary Problem (credit implosion) which existed because government f–ked up the PREVIOUS Scary Problem (not enough housing for poor people).

Daggett on June 4, 2009 at 4:18 PM

In a dense forest, there was lake. All the animals used to drink water from the lake. The water of this lake was so sweet that many fish lived there for long time. In this lake there lived a crab. The crab’s best friend was a swan. That swan was in the same lake. They were happy in the company of each other. Their happiness lasted until one day a snake made its home near the lake.

Every day the swan laid an egg. The snake would come and eat it up. “I have to find a way to save my eggs,” thought the swan.

One day, he went to the crab and said, “Please help me, dear friend. My eggs are under threat. That cruel snake eats all the eggs in the nest. What can I do?”

The crab decided to help its best friend. The crab thought for a while. Then he said, “I have an idea. Let us catch some fish from this lake and scatter them from the snake’s house till the mongoose house.” That mongoose lived in the nearby tree.

Then, the crab and the swan caught some fish and dropped them from the mongoose’s house all the way to the snake’s house. Then both of them hid behind a tree and watched. They waited for some time. After a long time, the mongoose came out. He saw the fish and was overjoyed. “Mymm! Fish right outside my own house!” he said, smacking his lips. He happily ate all of them one by one. As he ate he kept following the fish trail to the snake’s house. Finally, the mongoose reached the house of the snake. Both the crab and the swan were watching all these events, waiting behind the tree.

When the snake saw the mongoose, he thought, “That mongoose is here to attack me. I had better fight with it.” After some time, the snake started to fight with the mongoose. They fought for some time. After a fierce battle, the mongoose killed the snake.

Watching this behind the tree, the swan and the crab heaved a sigh of relief. But her joy was short-lived. The next day, the mongoose, looking for more fish, came upon the swan’s nest. There the mongoose found more eggs of the swan. He immediately ate all of them. The swan and the crab now felt helpless. They had brought this new threat upon themselves. They did not know that the mongoose was the dangerous helper. “Our thoughtlessness has got us a new enemy. Even more dangerous than the previous enemy,” cried the two friends.

After few days, they decided to form one more plan to get rid of the dangerous helper – mongoose. It is must to be careful while fighting with an enemy.

Joe Caps on June 4, 2009 at 4:44 PM

They what, 1.8 billion short?

brandozilla on June 4, 2009 at 4:40 PM

Trillion. $1.8 trillion short for 2009 alone, and that’s before Obamacare.

How much is a trillion? One trillion seconds is 31,688 years.

aero on June 4, 2009 at 4:53 PM

Trillions in debt? You can damned well bet that Barry and Friends are going to have a hard time in 2010 and 2012. Because the economy will be SCREWED!

GarandFan on June 4, 2009 at 5:07 PM

Look! Royalty going to a Broadway show!

Daggett on June 4, 2009 at 4:20 PM

Look, Hussein! No, really you can look this time!

LibTired (KO) on June 4, 2009 at 5:15 PM

I took as a vindication for the Tea Parties.

rob verdi on June 4, 2009 at 5:28 PM

The last time Democrats hiked taxes was 1993. 1994 they were wiped out.

Raise them.

Chuck Schick on June 4, 2009 at 5:33 PM

Oh and just a little perspective- cutting out just the tax hikes for the rich will be just over $60 billion a year- by Obama’s incredibly rosy projections. More realistic projections have them around $40-50B.

He ran up another $1.2 trillion in spending by week #3- every cent of it borrowed.

There’s no possible way out of this without taxing the masses beyond just repealing the Bush tax cuts. He knows this, which is why they have to wait until November 2013 for the bulk of them.

Investors and the rich will come soon and retard the recovery significantly. As “evil” as the rich are, they provide the jobs.

Chuck Schick on June 4, 2009 at 5:38 PM

Of course this is part of the taxaton without representation strategy.

It’s gonna be huge.

notagool on June 4, 2009 at 5:48 PM

What is that you say? Debts must be paid? Says who?

Terrye on June 4, 2009 at 6:02 PM

Bring it on. Once the electorate finds out that they really have to pay for all this stuff, you’ll see them making hard choices very quickly. And Obama is the casualty in that.

PersonalLiberty on June 4, 2009 at 6:05 PM

Chuck Schick on June 4, 2009 at 5:33 PM

A) That is not entirely true.

2) When was the last time the inmates had this much power?

3) And oh, I never heard a liberal advocate tax increases no matter the time or topic.

IlikedAUH2O on June 4, 2009 at 6:06 PM

The Dems think that it will NOT cost them. After all, most of them cheat or live on the DC gravy train.

IlikedAUH2O on June 4, 2009 at 6:09 PM

Snack taxes, pop taxes, plastic bag taxes, cap and trade, Obamacare, stimulus, bailouts, Government Motors…I don’t really think this is what people had in mind when they signed on for Hope and Change.

But they asked for it, now they are gonna get it.

Terrye on June 4, 2009 at 6:10 PM

That’s why Obama’s deficits today are best thought of as generation theft.

If we’re right (see the link for the tool and numbers behind it), the maximum personal income tax rate will need to increase from 35% today to 70% by 2010 or no later than 2011, but could be lowered to 65-66% in the longer term, provided economic growth follows what the trustees of Social Security have forecast. If not, then expect higher tax rates.

Alternatively, the government could keep income tax rates lower than that 70% level by imposing other taxes aimed more at those earning between $20,000 and $70,000 (that’s the income range where most of the money is in the U.S.).

And yes, people at the Fed and within the policy writing arms of the government do read the things we write.

ironman on June 4, 2009 at 6:11 PM

If obama has ever heard of the laffer curve, or has any common sense, he will know that tax rate increases do not increase revenue. We are already at, or quickly approaching, the point of diminishing returns. Increased tax rates will actually generate less tax revenue.

There is no way out. The printing presses will be used.

keep the change on June 4, 2009 at 6:18 PM

Bernanke did NOT suggest new taxes in any way. He would probably be the first one to say that new taxes will cripple the economy. Obama and the dems have no cover in all of this. There is just not enough money to go around.

Welcome to California’s problem!

Freddy on June 4, 2009 at 10:04 PM

All of this is part of a choreographed process to raise taxes and add more government control. Obama has already said that “We can’t live beyond our means” even though he is the one that took us to new heights of that phrase. This is more of the “don’t let a crisis go to waste”. I believe his intent from the beginning was to run up huge deficits to set the foundation for tax increases and further gov’t. regulation. Notice how he continually links changes in health care to the deficit without any shred of evidence that the current health system is causing the economic problems or why is Europe suffering the same problems. Before this is over I predict the suggestion (at a minimum) of a wealth tax will surface in the name of “fairness”.

mrveritas on June 5, 2009 at 12:14 PM

lets see, what will bambi do? more stimulus, health care, amnesty, as long as timmy g can print money BO will continue to spend.

la.rt.wngr on June 5, 2009 at 2:30 PM

Comment pages:


You must be logged in to post a comment.