Smart car gets highest score in crash tests

sesquipedalian on June 4, 2009 at 7:48 AM

Yeah! 100% fatalities.

andycanuck

Alright, you cowards, I’ll bite (left my dignity at the unemployment office).
I’m thinking…Depends, with just a hint of trout.

passenger side at 45 miles an hour the driver passenger

or

passenger driver side at 45 miles an hour the driver

When I am stunned by the intellectual laziness of liberals my brain works faster then my fingers.

please try! but read this first:
sesquipedalian on June 4, 2009 at 7:48 AM

Man, you liberals don’t know how to be thorough. You find a sentence that fits your needs and extrapolate absolute conclusions. That is why liberalism is a nonsense philosophy. Look at barry, his views are so totally knee jerk that they often contradict each other. You might have continued reading instead of getting all giddy and wet,

The tests, released Wednesday, show how well vehicles stack up against others of similar size and weight. The institute noted that the front-end test scores can’t be compared across weight classes, meaning a small car that earns a good rating isn’t considered safer than a large car that did not earn the highest rating.

The article does not give the number of cars in it’s class or list specifically what cars are considered in it’s class. Doesn’t that make you wonder? When was the last time you read an article about a certain model that did not compare it specifically with another car? My guess is that the number of cars in this cars class that it was compared with was…zero. I’ve taken a close look at these cars up close and personal. If an expedition or suv of equal size hit this car on the passenger side at 45 miles an hour the driver would likely die instantly of massive head injuries. If this car got tangled up with a semi on a highway at 70 miles an hour they would have to vacuum the occupants remains out of the ball of shredded metal and glass.

now I just run through them in my new Acura TL

Defector01 on June 3, 2009 at 10:23 PM

So that’s what the TL’s grill-o-tine is for!

Seriously, these cars were all over Amsterdam in 2001. I tried to bring one home but it wouldn’t quite fit in the overhead compartment.

Of course I will never do that because I am older and mature now.

They look slightly different — more like this, actually — but the salient fact remains that I could total one of them by taking a running start and diving into the hood.

please try! but read this first:

Smart car gets highest score in crash tests
Size may be less of an issue in potential urban accidents — study

The new HopenChange EGO Mobile.

1. Union Goon sales guy will make you an offer you can’t refuse.
2. It only turns left.
3. Dual Cup Holders for Koolaid
4. Tires have proper inflation so we don’t need to drill for oil.
5. Plenty of trunk space for Illegal Aliens.
6. Black on the outside White on the inside.
7. Huge Vanity Mirror.
8. Radio has one channel locked on NPR.
9. You won’t get pulled over by the thought Police.
10. “Rules for Radicals” in glove Box.
11. No gun rack allowed.
12. Floor Mats are prayer rugs
13. Obama/Biden 2012 bumper sticker permanently affixed

http://www.caribbeanriders.com/

Repeats already?

Knucklehead on June 3, 2009 at 9:59 PM

Perhaps it’s a government paid-for public service message. Eventually, we should see 6 to 8 repeats of this ad daily here and on all US websites.

We missed this when it was originally produced, but Allah has recycled it for our pleasure. It is now the Clip of the Day(s)™.

Not one Republican is going to be remembered or blamed for the disaster that likely awaits us when the best laid plans of …

The Pelosi-mobile’s headlights (no pun) are always on high beam. The Pelosiac Staremaster.

It’s all been done before.

What would the survival ratio be per crash, for this vehicle? Example: 3 to 1. 3 crashes in this vehicle till you die. I don’t know I’m just trying to break the ice….

Of course all the credit to that Prophet of the Plains, Iowahawk.