Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


The opportunity on Sotomayor, part II

posted at 5:35 pm on June 3, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

Last week, I wrote that the Republicans have an opportunity with the Sonia Sotomayor nomination not to conduct filibusters or fire-breathing sermons, but to calmly and dispassionately demonstrate that neither she nor Barack Obama represent the opinions of the majority of Americans on identity politics.  A new Quinnipiac poll underscores that opportunity.  A majority of voters across a wide swath of demographics oppose affirmative action and race- and gender-based setasides in government, education, and academia:

American voters say 55 – 36 percent that affirmative action should be abolished, and disagree 71 – 19 percent with Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayer’s ruling in the New Haven firefighters’ case, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released today.

More than 70 percent of voters say diversity is not a good enough reason to give minorities preferential treatment in competition for government or private sector jobs, the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pe-ack) University survey of more than 3,000 voters finds.

This poll brings good news to those who want to see a color-blind society.  For the most part, all demographics favor protections for the disabled, but not for ethnicity and gender:

  • Support 55 – 39 percent affirmative action for the disabled in hiring, promotions and college admissions. Protestants and Catholics support it, 49 – 46 percent and 49 – 47 percent, respectively. Jews also support it 59 – 25 percent;
  • Oppose 70 – 25 percent giving some racial groups preference for government jobs to increase diversity. Black voters support it 49 – 45 percent while Hispanic voters are opposed 58 – 38 percent;
  • Oppose 74 – 21 percent giving some racial groups preference for private sector jobs to increase diversity. Voters in every racial and religious group oppose this;
  • Oppose 64 – 29 percent affirmative action for Hispanics in hiring, promotion and college entry. Black voters support it 59 – 30 percent while Hispanics split 47 – 48 percent;
  • Oppose 61 – 33 percent affirmative action for blacks in hiring, promotion and college entry. Black voters support this 69 – 26 percent, as do Hispanics 51 – 46 percent;
  • Oppose 62 – 32 percent affirmative action for white women in hiring, promotion and college entry. Women oppose this 58 – 35 percent but blacks support it 55 – 37 percent.

This puts Sotomayor and Obama in a narrow group that still favors preferential treatment and outcome-based policies.  Republicans should see this as the real goal of the confirmation hearings – to communicate this to the entire electorate.  As the poll demonstrates, it entails almost no risk and a large potential upside.

But in order to make that argument, they need to stick to rational arguments based on Sotomayor’s own words and her decisions, especially on Ricci.  The GOP needs to avoid the inflammatory personal insults and the demand for obstructionism and focus on the fight they can win.  Most Americans will agree that a President has the prerogative to get his judicial appointments a fair vote, at the very least.  That doesn’t mean Republicans have to vote to confirm Sotomayor, but a filibuster won’t work, and a failed attempt will make the GOP look even more impotent.

In this case, Republicans represent the majority of Americans.  They have a great opportunity to use the confirmation hearings as a stage to demonstrate that, as well as demonstrate their readiness not just to oppose Obama but to prove themselves trustworthy enough for leadership in DC.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages:

Ms. Sotomayor, can you tell this panel why you said the same thing, twice, years apart, and then state that you had simply misspoken?

OhEssYouCowboys on June 3, 2009 at 5:38 PM

Ah, so maybe the whole “do not judge a man by the color of his skin, but by the content of his character” dream will be realized.

Funny how the lefties are the ones standing in the way of that goal.

Joe Caps on June 3, 2009 at 5:40 PM

“In this case, Republicans represent the majority of Americans.”

But do they have the courage, integrity and will?

Star20 on June 3, 2009 at 5:41 PM

This is very good strategy. This is what Newt’s brain should be focused on. How to make sure the public sees the direction Obama is leading us.

Newt brought us the contract with America… I don’t like his style too much but I recognize his brain.

We are desperate for leadership that makes sense. We are correct on our politics. We just need to stand up for what is right.

petunia on June 3, 2009 at 5:43 PM

But do they have the courage, integrity and will?

Star20 on June 3, 2009 at 5:41 PM

No, they do not. Look for some weak platitudes but no real dialogue or points made.

catlady on June 3, 2009 at 5:44 PM

is that Rosanne Barr in that picture ?

redrock on June 3, 2009 at 5:46 PM

Wish we had someone in the Senate that would grow some ba@@s. My senator John Cornyn has just been rolling over. Kay Bailey Hutchinson is going to run for governor, so she is taking no chance with the hispanic vote here. Too sad…

catlady on June 3, 2009 at 5:48 PM

Ask the American public why the Justice statues across America have her blindfolded?

It seems from this poll that the GOP has an upperbound on the black vote at ~25% and ~45% with the Hispanics.

WashJeff on June 3, 2009 at 5:48 PM

I hate to say it, but I think Rosanne looks better….

catlady on June 3, 2009 at 5:48 PM

It is simple; No more, No less.
We just treat her just like any other candidate.
Bork, Estrada, Meirs, Thomas, Pickering, Roberts.
We just calmly go about the business of congress, following the precedent, and let her answer the same question, in the same tone as the other candidates.
No more…No less…equality, treat her the same.

right2bright on June 3, 2009 at 5:49 PM

The GOP needs to avoid the inflammatory personal insults and the demand for obstructionism and focus on the fight they can win

Hear, hear.

Some people think that we can win by tossing bombs. We need to persuade people.

Gingrich could have made the same point without using the racism charge. Just repeat her words, again and again and again.

The public will make the connection.

Besides, we know the press won’t let us pull 1/3 the stuff that the left does. Face it, that’s the environment we have to operate in.

SteveMG on June 3, 2009 at 5:51 PM

right2bright on June 3, 2009 at 5:49 PM

Yeah, that is how it should go, but will it? I am very cynical right now, so I have a deep distrust of the current set of circumstances. All the polls in the world will not change these arrogant “public servants” we have in the White House. They continue to push the boundaries and will do so for a long time to come.

catlady on June 3, 2009 at 5:52 PM

Ask the American public why the Justice statues across America have her blindfolded?

It seems from this poll that the GOP has an upperbound on the black vote at ~25% and ~45% with the Hispanics.

WashJeff on June 3, 2009 at 5:48 PM

And 80% of them, after admitting that they didn’t know she was blindfolded, would say that she is blind to the racism, sexism and hatred that has been perpetrated, by white males, upon women and persons-of-color … oh, and upon the gender-in-question.

OhEssYouCowboys on June 3, 2009 at 5:53 PM

For those of you who know that the GOP members of Congress have been pathetic in drawing the lines in the sand, there is one man who is responsible for the decline in support for Sotomayor: Rush Limbaugh.

technopeasant on June 3, 2009 at 5:55 PM

No more…No less…equality, treat her the same.

right2bright on June 3, 2009 at 5:49 PM

But, that is not fair.

Johan Klaus on June 3, 2009 at 5:57 PM

catlady on June 3, 2009 at 5:48 PM

But only by a smidgen…

ladyingray on June 3, 2009 at 5:59 PM

The Republicans currently being paid to protect this nation, the American way of life and make it a better place are self serving idiots. They are so worried about their own butts that they could care less about a strategy to keep extremists from power.

Hening on June 3, 2009 at 6:01 PM

Last week, I wrote that the Republicans have an opportunity with the Sonia Sotomayor nomination not to conduct filibusters or fire-breathing sermons, but to calmly and dispassionately demonstrate that neither she nor Barack Obama represent the opinions of the majority of Americans on identity politics.

“Calm” doesn’t work. This situation calls for fire. The fire of pure, unvarnished truth. They need to be called exactly what they are, because they represent the greatest threat this nation has seen. The threat that put an absolute imbecile with no talent, no eligibility, and a chip on his shoulder the size of … the US and the West, in the Oval Office where he is taking this nation apart at a breakneck speed.

No, calm is exactly the wrong approach. Fire is needed.

progressoverpeace on June 3, 2009 at 6:01 PM

I hate to say it, but I think Rosanne looks better….

catlady on June 3, 2009 at 5:48 PM

Her looks are relevant.

The Race Card on June 3, 2009 at 6:05 PM

She’s got a 2002 speech to Berkley that’s worse than anything she’s said recently. Go google it and prepare to gag.

TheUnrepentantGeek on June 3, 2009 at 6:08 PM

This puts Sotomayor and Obama in a narrow group that still favors preferential treatment and outcome-based policies.

Obama and his O-bots are fringe. Something the gutless GOP doesn’t seem to realize.

ddrintn on June 3, 2009 at 6:10 PM

I hate to say it, but I think Rosanne looks better….

catlady on June 3, 2009 at 5:48 PM

Her looks are relevant.

The Race Card on June 3, 2009 at 6:05 PM

They are when it’s a conservative.

ddrintn on June 3, 2009 at 6:12 PM

Last week, I wrote that the Republicans have an opportunity with the Sonia Sotomayor nomination not to conduct filibusters or fire-breathing sermons, but to calmly and dispassionately demonstrate that neither she nor Barack Obama represent the opinions of the majority of Americans on identity politics.

Why not do both?

Calmly and dispassionately probably first, then fire-breathing mostly after that.

Combined arms.

MB4 on June 3, 2009 at 6:14 PM

We are desperate for leadership that makes sense. We are correct on our politics. We just need to stand up for what is right.

petunia on June 3, 2009 at 5:43 PM

I agree with your whole post, and Ed’s. We need Republican spokespeople who are calm, mature, reasonable, and base their discussions on verifiable facts, to further our agenda. I do believe this will demonstrate that our values are American values, and liberal values are not.

However, I still think it’s okay for us to be at least a little bit crazy on blog posting boards.

After all, I would hope that wise conservative blog commentators with the richness of our experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than any liberal politician who hasn’t lived that life.

Loxodonta on June 3, 2009 at 6:17 PM

I hate to say it, but I think Rosanne looks better….

catlady on June 3, 2009 at 5:48 PM

Her looks are relevant.

The Race Card on June 3, 2009 at 6:05 PM

There should be a law against a woman being that ugly. In fact she should be attested on multiple counts of crimes against humanity.

Tuco on June 3, 2009 at 6:20 PM

Why not do both?

Calmly and dispassionately probably first, then fire-breathing mostly after that.

Combined arms.

MB4 on June 3, 2009 at 6:14 PM

I’m hoping that with more exposure, public support for Sotomayor will erode further. And with any luck, Sotomayor or Democrats in the Senate will sound wacky enough that the whole nomination will unravel before Republican fire-breathing or filibuster is needed.

But even if that doesn’t happen, the comparison between adult Republicans, calming asking questions, and Democrats playing silly children’s games with words, will help us in 2010. We must get at least several more conservative Republicans in the Senate, and preferably a majority, so we can slow down Obama’s erosion of our liberties, economy and national security.

We must keep our eyes on the prize: the 2010 Senate elections.

Loxodonta on June 3, 2009 at 6:32 PM

I still want Sotomayor pressed for evidence of her theory – standardized tests and the scores – and she should HAVE to say which Latin country the US should try to emulate. It will take fire to get this out of her. It will take fire to not let her slink away, hiding under the liberal rock until it blows over.

progressoverpeace on June 3, 2009 at 6:33 PM

is that Rosanne Barr in that picture ?

I hate to say it, but I think Rosanne looks better…

But only by a smidgen…

There should be a law against a woman being that ugly

More keen political insight from the hotair gang.

benny shakar on June 3, 2009 at 6:33 PM

More keen political insight from the hotair gang.

benny shakar on June 3, 2009 at 6:33 PM

She was nominated for her superficial physical characteristics, being Hispanic and a female, so there is nothing wrong with her being criticized for other superficial physical characteristics.

She isn’t there because of her intelligence. That’s what the “empathy” covers for.

progressoverpeace on June 3, 2009 at 6:38 PM

She’s got a 2002 speech to Berkley that’s worse than anything she’s said recently. Go google bing it and prepare to gag.

TheUnrepentantGeek on June 3, 2009 at 6:08 PM

FIFY :)

ihasurnominashun on June 3, 2009 at 6:40 PM

TheUnrepentantGeek on June 3, 2009 at 6:08 PM

OMG….could she have said it any clearer?

Judge Cedarbaum nevertheless believes that judges must transcend their personal sympathies and prejudices and aspire to achieve a greater degree of fairness and integrity based on the reason of law. Although I agree with and attempt to work toward Judge Cedarbaum’s aspiration, I wonder whether achieving that goal is possible in all or even in most cases.

I further accept that our experiences as women and people of color affect our decisions. The aspiration to impartiality is just that — it’s an aspiration because it denies the fact that we are by our experiences making different choices than others.

http://open.salon.com/blog/susanthur/2009/06/01/sotomayor_2001_berkley_speechread_it_here

This stuff has got to get out there!!

ihasurnominashun on June 3, 2009 at 6:50 PM

She isn’t there because of her intelligence. That’s what the “empathy” covers for.
progressoverpeace on June 3, 2009 at 6:38 PM

More keen (and hilarious) political insight from the hotair gang.

benny shakar on June 3, 2009 at 6:50 PM

benny shakar on June 3, 2009 at 6:33 PM

yes, troll, they’re crass. You’re much worse: You’re a worthless lying mouthpiece for idiot-leftist groups and for Obama

Go back to Huffpo……..

Janos Hunyadi on June 3, 2009 at 6:53 PM

benny shakar on June 3, 2009 at 6:50 PM

Okay, benny. Hit me with an example of her sterling intellect. Let’s see that brilliance. Some original idea of hers floating around somewhere.

I’ve already seen many examples of her stupidity, it would be nice to see something else. Let’s see the brilliance. After so many years on the bench, her great wisdom must have been displayed once or twice, at least.

progressoverpeace on June 3, 2009 at 7:27 PM

Ef nice! Bork the B….!
I’m sick and damn tired of nice. I want to see fur fly and racist traitors called racist affirmative action traitors from the CIC and his puppet master Emmanuel to the Latino affirmative action Judge.

The left does it to us it’s wayyyy past time in Juan McAmnestys’ words to fight fight fight. Something McCain and a bunch of other RINO’s traded in years ago for Pander, Pander, Pander.

I sent the lastest RNC Census Survey back with no dough and a note. No money till they act like they mean it. Until then Sarahpac gets my spare change. Screw the nicey nicey republican crap, it’s lost our country over to a bunch of Marxists led by a Muslim bent on destroying our contitution and socializing our economy. Wake up and fight.

dhunter on June 3, 2009 at 7:33 PM

Looking at the poll numbers, I’m amazed and saddened to see that blacks in America have such incredibly low self-esteem that they don’t feel they can get ahead without the gummit holding their hands.

Is it that the schools they attend are so horrible that they don’t feel that they can learn enough to make a decent living and compete with other people of color and the people of no color? What, exactly, is going on?

disa on June 3, 2009 at 7:44 PM

Anytime, benny …

progressoverpeace on June 3, 2009 at 8:12 PM

Okay, benny. Hit me with an example of her sterling intellect.

progressoverpeace on June 3, 2009 at 7:27 PM

Fuggedaboudit. I’m still waiting for benny to show me some proof of Obama’s constitutional scholarship.

ddrintn on June 3, 2009 at 8:56 PM

“Calm” doesn’t work. This situation calls for fire. The fire of pure, unvarnished truth. They need to be called exactly what they are, because they represent the greatest threat this nation has seen. … No, calm is exactly the wrong approach. Fire is needed.

If the fire comes from the examiners, it will discredit the examiners. It is essential that the pure, unvarnished truth be exposed with calm and reason, so that when it bursts into flame like white phosphorus nobody will be able to claim that it was lit by the examiners, but all will have to see it for what it is: toxic, hazardous, and destructive.

njcommuter on June 3, 2009 at 10:06 PM

I don’t see how Red Sonia can get a fair confirmation hearing from all those white male senators. There aren’t enough “wise latinas” to reach a good result.

Obama evidently plans to turn the Supreme Court into a permanent episode of “The View”, one opinionated dolt at a time.

virgo on June 4, 2009 at 12:30 AM

Excellent post, Ed!

Republican Senators on the Judiciary Committee need to question Sotomayor on the Ricci case, and also on the Kelo case.

They could also ask Sotomayor hypothetical questions like, “If a Hispanic applicant sued for discrimination after a non-Hispanic applicant received a job for which he/she was better qualified by impartial criteria, would you vote to uphold the discrimination suit?”. If Sotomayor answers yes, follow up with, “Do you realize that this view is opposed by 60 to 70% of the American people?”

Due to the current composition of the Senate, Sotomayor will probably be confirmed anyway, but the Republicans need to make the point that judges in America are supposed to ensure, as stated in the Pledge of Allegiance, “liberty and justice for ALL”, not just certain ethnic groups.

Steve Z on June 4, 2009 at 9:41 AM

Comment pages:


You must be logged in to post a comment.