Comments on: Bonnie Erbe: That Playboy “hate f***” piece was wrong but Malkin sort of deserved it

By: Carrie Prejean, on Being Fired by Miss California Pageant, ‘I Was Speechless’ | Sean Hannity Exclusive Video Interview « Frugal Café Blog Zone

Fri, 12 Jun 2009 22:09:06 +0000

[...] point of view Hot Air: It’s official: Playboy is a hate site; Update: Playboy pulled it and Bonnie Erbe: That Playboy “hate f***” piece was wrong but Malkin sort of deserved it and Video: Megyn Kelly unloads on Playboy The New Agenda: Playboy: Now With More Misogyny! [...]

By: Leaning Straight Up » My take on the Letterman/Palin feud, with Palin’s shocking defender

Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:18:57 +0000

[...] Parker’s blame the victim comments: Via Gateway Pundit, an uncannily similar reprise of Bonnie Erbe’s shot at Michelle, with Parker in the Erbe role and Palin standing in for MM. Yes indeed, says Parker, Letterman’s [...]

By: Hot Air » Blog Archive » Kathleen Parker: Palin kind of asked for those nasty Letterman jokes, didn’t she?

Thu, 11 Jun 2009 20:46:03 +0000

[...] Gateway Pundit, an uncannily similar reprise of Bonnie Erbe’s shot at Michelle, with Parker in the Erbe role and Palin standing in for MM. Yes indeed, says Parker, [...]

By: “She Was Asking for It.” | Little Miss Attila

“She Was Asking for It.” | Little Miss Attila — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 23:38:42 +0000

[...] AllahP, who strikes just the right note in defending his employer against a rather monstrous [...]

By: Public’s ‘Right to Know’ Censored: AOL Fires Writer Tommy Christopher for Reporting Sexist Hate-Rape Playboy Article « Frugal Café Blog Zone

Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:58:16 +0000

[...] Christopher; Why? Hot Air: It’s official: Playboy is a hate site; Update: Playboy pulled it and Bonnie Erbe: That Playboy “hate f***” piece was wrong but Malkin sort of deserved it The New Agenda: Playboy: Now With More Misogyny! Caleb’s Blog, RedState: The Playboy Article [...]

By: Bravo, Elisabeth… Elisabeth Hasselbeck Goes After Playboy for Disgusting ‘Hate-Rape of Top 10 Conservative Women’ Article (video) « Frugal Café Blog Zone

Fri, 05 Jun 2009 05:03:20 +0000

[...] Conservative Women Hot Air: It’s official: Playboy is a hate site; Update: Playboy pulled it and Bonnie Erbe: That Playboy “hate f***” piece was wrong but Malkin sort of deserved it The New Agenda: Playboy: Now With More Misogyny! Michelle Malkin: This is what feminism looks like [...]

By: Al in St. Lou

Al in St. Lou — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:54:48 +0000

Erbe makes me want to puke. (Or is it the stale coffee I just drank?)

By: Callie C.

Callie C. — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 18:03:58 +0000

Nothing Michelle has ever said or written can come close to being described as venom or venomous.

darwin on June 3, 2009 at 5:18 PM

You’re absolutely right. Michelle has a strong point of view, which I happen to agree with, but she is never hurtful or mean-spirited, like Olberman who has a permanent scowl on his face. I guess liberals define “venomous” as anything they disagree with especially when it comes from a non-white person who is supposed to be on their side (yeah right).

By: Jaibones

Jaibones — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 16:44:16 +0000

Just answering your question without commenting on the rest the answer is: her name is Noelle Hancock

TASS71 on June 3, 2009 at 6:17 PM

Oooohhhh…

By: Jaibones

Jaibones — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 16:41:55 +0000

As a nonpartisan, pro-abortion, liberal Democrat

peacenprosperity on June 4, 2009 at 7:20 AM

Uh…just so there is no confusion, I believe that Allah is quoting a comment on the U.S. News web site, paraphrasing the idiot author. That statement is not from the author herself.

I know, because it’s my comment. Sorry if it gave you the wrong impression.

By: MSGTAS

MSGTAS — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 14:09:52 +0000

Venom is hate speech. Let’s get our terms straight, hate is a word that simply implies a great dislike for something. Venom is a substance that is deadly when injected into a living being.

By association, equating the speech of Michelle Malkin as venomous is to imply she is an animal capable of delivering venom. Those following this tact are also calling her a snake or reptile which she is not and shows the lack of depth in their personality and ability to think critically.

By: KendraWilder

KendraWilder — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 13:52:18 +0000

Democratic Party & Many Liberals/Progressives:

Unless you toe their party line and drink the Kool Aid, then intolerance is their modus operandi.

Funny how the MSM, that bastion of self-appointed public watchdogs, turns a blind eye when it’s convenient, as in this totally outrageous instance. But that’s also how the general public, too busy working jobs and trying to raise families, is kept in the dark as to the true agenda of the Dems/Libs/Progs.

The MSM’s blackouts of specific newsworthy items, lately, smacks of outright journalistic malpractice. One would hope that at the rate they’re losing viewership/subscriptions, the implosions will be happening fast enough so that they can’t significantly impact the 2010 mid-terms.

By: peacenprosperity

peacenprosperity — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 11:20:34 +0000

As a nonpartisan, pro-abortion, liberal Democrat

That is about as funny a statement I’ve heard in a long time but it is definitively illustrative of the the delusional postmodern mind.

How come no one has investigated this playboy writer? The left would have been all over this guy by now? I read the piece, there was nothing funny about it, there wasn’t even any indication he was trying to be funny. Why can’t the nonliberal groups in this country investigate this guy and his motivations and reveal them publicly? That, in my opinion, is fair. My bet is that this guy is a very active member of his grenwich village neighborhood social scene. What not reveal the true hatred and dysfunction that lies under the surface of that neurosis.

By: Venusian Visitor

Venusian Visitor — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 09:22:54 +0000

Michelle is a brave, beautiful lady. She is unique in her forthrightness, conviction, and refusal to be intimidated. Only scum would entertain such perverse and revolting thoughts about her. Only monsters would publish such thoughts as “entertainment.” And, make no mistake, this was not even intended to be entertainment: it was an incitement. The thought begets the deed. American soldiers have been portrayed as detestable for years. Eventually, someone takes action, but it’s a non-event because, after all, they deserved it. That is what Playboy’s permission to hate set Michelle up for, no more and no less.

Never forget: we are fighting scum, we are battling monsters. Don’t let them distract or intimidate you with allegations of racism or with personal attacks. Michelle doesn’t. That’s why they fear her so.

By: ThereGoesTheNeighborhood

ThereGoesTheNeighborhood — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 04:26:51 +0000

But….. she’s conservative! Do we really need to prove anything else?!

By: UltimateBob

UltimateBob — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 04:25:56 +0000

Just like Nazi’s, Klansmen, and the Taliban…they are not progressive as they are not moving forward, learning from errors and sins of the past. They are “regressives”, and should be labeled such at every opportunity.

Harry Schell on June 3, 2009 at 6:58 PM

+1000

Harry, I’ve been saying this for years, but mainly in reference to the taxation policies of the left. They want to take us back to a time when kings and tyrants ruled, the government had limitless powers and the people had very limited rights.

We need to make this point at every opportunity. The left are Regressives.

By: keyboarddude

keyboarddude — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 03:52:48 +0000

So, I see…because Miss Malkin doesn’t speak in the same liberal accepted language as expected, (you DO realize you’re a minority woman, don’t you?!? Will you start acting like the frail weak chick they expect for the love of god???) she’s deserving of being violently raped.

Uh, yeah.

That makes perfect sense.

Morons.

By: Did I say feminists were nutty? « The Daley Gator

Did I say feminists were nutty? « The Daley Gator — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 03:04:35 +0000

[...] Tolerance Liberal Style! Explore posts in the same categories: Left-Wing Hate [...]

By: ddrintn

ddrintn — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 02:26:08 +0000

Del Dolemonte on June 3, 2009 at 10:11 PM

I can’t be bothered to look it up, but isn’t she one of the PBS leeches?

By: Del Dolemonte

Del Dolemonte — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 02:11:31 +0000

Just read Erbe’s background story. A mind is a terrible thing to waste.

By: TheBigOldDog

TheBigOldDog — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 02:04:39 +0000

Laura can pound them 2-4 hours a day coast-to-coast, 5 days a week. She can flood them with email and calls. She can get people to drop their subscriptions. She can get shopkeepers to stop stocking it. In short, Laura has a big megaphone and a big megaphone = power.

By: TheBigOldDog

TheBigOldDog — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 01:55:45 +0000

I don’t get why MM was the only one singled out, though. Wasn’t Laura Ingraham, who’s as fearless as anyone in confronting the left, also on the Playboy list?

MM doesn’t have the megaphone Laura has.

By: CarolynM

CarolynM — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 01:36:42 +0000

If they get to rape Malkin

Can I punch Jane Fonda?

blatantblue on June 3, 2009 at 5:28 PM
You can have Fonda. I’ll take Garofalo.

UltimateBob on June 3, 2009 at 5:31 PM

OH so i suppose you think it’s O’k to stick me with Bahar, thanks a bunch.

heshtesh on June 3, 2009 at 8:03 PM

All of you, stop it. You’re all better than this.

ladyingray on June 3, 2009 at 8:35 PM

You’re right, you’re right, we are all better than this but can’t I at least get Ashley Judd in a headlock? Just once?

By: ddrintn

ddrintn — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 01:31:03 +0000

After all this time and effort by women to be treated as equals and these “feminists” are now the ones using the “she asked for it” excuse.

The Opinionator on June 3, 2009 at 9:03 PM

Well, if you’ll remember, it came in handy when Clinton was in office too. The Left has no principles.

The Left will tolerate any evil as long as the “right” people are getting hurt.

Harry Schell on June 3, 2009 at 6:58 PM

Exactly right.

By: mad scientist

mad scientist — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 01:30:44 +0000

The elephant in the room that everyone is ignoring is that the article says “hate-****” when they are too cowardly to say what they really mean which is “execute or imprison until death”. Libtards threw parties when Reagan passed; they produced books and movies fantasizing about the asassination of Bush; there’s a lot of self-renewing hate out there (sounds more like a pathology than a political party).
Look at what has happened in other societies that have gone down the tolitarian/marxist/communist by any other name path (Russia, Cuba, Venezuela) and you will see that ostracization/ridicule/imprisonment for political reasons has happened repeatedly (and is still happening).
We as a society need to ensure that ALL opinions are heard and free speech is not the equivalent to painting a target on ones-self.
I’m not surprised that feminists have abandoned all of their principles in an effort to retain power; they see the political reality and are adjusting to it. A moral compass is a liability to a Liberal, kind of like garlic to a vampire.