Video: Blogger forced to defend tool who smeared his site just last week

… abortion providers have been targeted and murdered in the past. And the world is full of lunatics, as we all know.

Infidoll on June 1, 2009 at 11:29 PM

There has been a total of approximately eight abortionists targeted or attacked or killed in the past 30 years since Roe v Wade, yet the Media and uninformed individuals, including abortion choicers, exaggerate the danger and the “violence” and choose to paint Right to Life advocates/choicers as evil, violent terrorists who hate women and want to force women to have babies against their will.

Right! That’s why Right to Lifers have “Force women to have babies against their will” clinics throughout the world, millions of them, and that is why Right to Life choicers kidnap thousands of women per day and rape them and force them to become pregnant and have babies and raise babies, all against their will.

The entire idea is absurd, and a false claim made by misguided, uninformed abortion choicers, baby inside the womb haters, selfish individuals who think that their personal comfort and convenience is more important than the life of an innocent human being, one whose right to live is stolen with the simple act of hire a hitman, the abortionist and his staff, to slaughter a person before they have a chance to live and love, and without proper legal rights to defend him or herself against their cruel, unjust execution.

No, Right to Lifers are not violent, dangerous individuals, and not all of the small cases of violence targeting abortionists has been executed by “Pro-lifers,” another myth perpetrated by the sleeping-on-the job media who don’t even check their facts before shooting off their foul mouths, spewing their diarrhea of the mouth, stinking up the place.

If we were so violent, there would not be a single abortuary standing, not a stone standing upon a stone, and not a single abortionist or abortion clinic staff member alive today, nor would there be a “journalist” working for any media outlet who distorts the Right to Life point of view while favoring the abortion choicers’ point of view, who would be alive today. In fact, there wouldn’t be a single Hollywood-entertainment industry pro-abort loud mouth, comedian, rapper, musician, etc., who would be drawing breath today had the Pro-life movement been violent.

With millions of pro-lifers there are virtually zero cases of violence, yet the media and leftists and pro-aborts capitalize on any and all cases they can dig up and exaggerate that in their presentation of “news” to the people.

In the mean time, numerous of cases of violence against women inside abortuaries is ignored, as are the cases of coerced abortions in which women are forced against their will to abort, and women are harassed, beaten, and even murdered if they do not abort.

Of course there is more, such as abortuary personnel running down pro-lifers with their cars, abortion advocates attacking and beating senior citizens who are protesting abortion, and more.

No, the abortion clinics have a great deal of blood on their hands to go with their lies, distortions, and hatred.

Let’s not forget the millions of innocent babies butchered via chemical abortions, in which they are burned alive, or abortions in which the baby is cut to pieces, pulled apart, or even induced to birth and slaughtered on the way out of the womb.

This is the abortion industry, violent, dishonest, and hate filled, but you’d never know it based on the Main Stream Media’s selective and bias treatment of the issue.

Let’s be honest and change the word from “abortion providers” to “killers of innocent, defenseless babies.”

Thank you.

William2006 on June 2, 2009 at 8:20 AM

The 1000s of late term abortions Tiller committed are okay.
But the post-term abortion of Tiller himself was not sanctioned by the courts.

TheSitRep on June 2, 2009 at 7:38 AM

It is like the “Infidels” who are not worthy of life unless they convert to Islam or pay the Jizya (Religious tax) in order to submit to Islam as Dihmmies and live. Of the Jews who are considered monkeys, dogs, and pigs, or cousins of monkeys, dogs, and pigs.

It is similar to German propaganda painting Jews as vermin crawling out of the sewer, striking fear and hatred into the hearts of the German population who consequently abandoned any semblance of respect for other human beings who were considered “Jews,” but considered them righteous targets for their insecurities and hatred.

It is like the people who, in the 1930s in Germany, were considered “subhuman,” and “lives unworthy of life.”

It is like the Aborigine of Australia, dark skinned blacks on Continental Africa, and dark skinned Asian of India who were considered not fully human by Darwinists-evolutionists due to their dark skin, showing that they were less “Evolved” from their lower life form cousins.

It is like the Dred Scott v Sanford case, AKA the Dred Scott decision, in which black slaves in the US were considered not fully human, not worthy of rights, not free, but only property.

Of course then we can look back at Mao’s China and the Cultural Revolution in which the educated, professors, physicians, and shop keepers-merchants, were dispensable in order for those more worthy to take control and manifest their destiny. It was nothing for a mob of a few hundred to a few thousand youth to run over to Wong Seen Sang’s Market and take him out and butcher him in the street, or lock up the Ob/Gyns, college professors, and other learned men in prison and barely feed them of offer them drink.

Throughout recent history we can see how absurd previous actions and thoughts were, yet this is continued today in classifying an entire segment of the human race as not worthy of life, not human, or not human enough, all scientifically false, and inaccurate claims, yet worthy and deserving of being discarded and even butchered, exterminated, via abortion, all painted as a sacred right.

There are so many precedents.

Will people ever learn and show respect, or will people continue to call the slaughter of one’s offspring a “Reproductive Right,” when, clearly, killing one’s offspring is not reproductive, but counter to reproduction in that one has already reproduced and they are not complicit in killing their offspring?

William2006 on June 2, 2009 at 8:44 AM